首页 > 最新文献

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon最新文献

英文 中文
Stripping Massage and Literature Review in Post-Thoracoscopic Chest Pain Management. 胸腔镜术后胸痛治疗中的剥离按摩和文献综述。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI: 10.1055/a-2137-9035
Jiun Hsu, Sheng-Pin Yu, Chien-Te Pan, Pei-Ming Huang

The aim of this randomized study was to investigate whether stripping massage (SM) of myofascial trigger points in the lower rhomboid muscle could alleviate chest pain in patients following thoracoscopic surgery. In addition, a literature review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of various pain management techniques. Sixty adult patients who reported a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 4 or higher were randomly assigned to receive conventional analgesics alone (conventional group) or combined with SM twice daily for 2 weeks (SM group). VAS scores and the use of additional analgesics were evaluated on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30. Using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, a review of current pain management techniques was carried out up to January 31, 2022. A subgroup analysis was also performed to examine the treatment effect during different surgical periods and techniques. Results showed that the SM group had significantly lower VAS scores on postoperative days 3, 7, 14, and 30 (p < 0.001), as well as a shorter hospitalization duration and reduced need for additional analgesics (p < 0.001). The literature review included a total of 20 studies (2,342 cases of chest pain relief after thoracoscopic surgery), which indicated that serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks were commonly used as a perioperative approach to reduce pain and opioid consumption. SM and SAP can both serve as adjuvant treatments for chest pain in patients following thoracoscopic surgery, with SM being a safe and noninvasive pain control option after hospital discharge.

这项随机研究旨在探讨对斜方肌下部的肌筋膜触发点进行剥离按摩(SM)能否缓解胸腔镜手术后患者的胸痛。此外,还进行了文献综述,以评估各种疼痛治疗技术的有效性。60 名报告视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分为 4 分或更高的成年患者被随机分配到单独接受常规止痛药(常规组)或结合 SM 每天两次,持续 2 周(SM 组)。术后第 1、3、7、14 和 30 天对 VAS 评分和额外镇痛药的使用情况进行评估。利用 PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,对截至 2022 年 1 月 31 日的当前疼痛治疗技术进行了回顾。同时还进行了分组分析,以研究不同手术时期和技术的治疗效果。结果显示,SM 组在术后第 3 天、第 7 天、第 14 天和第 30 天的 VAS 评分明显较低(P P
{"title":"Stripping Massage and Literature Review in Post-Thoracoscopic Chest Pain Management.","authors":"Jiun Hsu, Sheng-Pin Yu, Chien-Te Pan, Pei-Ming Huang","doi":"10.1055/a-2137-9035","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2137-9035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this randomized study was to investigate whether stripping massage (SM) of myofascial trigger points in the lower rhomboid muscle could alleviate chest pain in patients following thoracoscopic surgery. In addition, a literature review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of various pain management techniques. Sixty adult patients who reported a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 4 or higher were randomly assigned to receive conventional analgesics alone (conventional group) or combined with SM twice daily for 2 weeks (SM group). VAS scores and the use of additional analgesics were evaluated on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30. Using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, a review of current pain management techniques was carried out up to January 31, 2022. A subgroup analysis was also performed to examine the treatment effect during different surgical periods and techniques. Results showed that the SM group had significantly lower VAS scores on postoperative days 3, 7, 14, and 30 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as a shorter hospitalization duration and reduced need for additional analgesics (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The literature review included a total of 20 studies (2,342 cases of chest pain relief after thoracoscopic surgery), which indicated that serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks were commonly used as a perioperative approach to reduce pain and opioid consumption. SM and SAP can both serve as adjuvant treatments for chest pain in patients following thoracoscopic surgery, with SM being a safe and noninvasive pain control option after hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"465-475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10047116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Single LIMA-LAD Bypass Appropriate for OPCAB Training? 单个 LIMA-LAD 分流术适合用于 OPCAB 培训吗?
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI: 10.1055/a-2260-5218
Shiho Naito, Hermann Reichenspurner, Björn Sill

Background:  A significant impact of surgeons' experience on outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) has been recognized through previous large-scale studies. However, a safe, effective, and concrete OPCAB training was yet to be identified. We evaluate a safety of our OPCAB training model with single left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-left anterior descending artery (LAD) as a reasonable first step.

Methods:  Between January 2010 and June 2019, 180 patients with an isolated single coronary bypass of the LAD using LIMA as an in situ graft via median sternotomy fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Coronary arterial bypass under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), utilizing other graft material, minimal invasive direct coronary arterial bypass through left-sided thoracotomy, and multiple diseased coronary artery disease were excluded. The primary outcome is an early postoperative outcome (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]: myocardial infarction, coronary re-revascularization, stroke, acute renal failure, and all causes of death) between residents in training under supervision (group 1: n = 63) and experienced surgeons (group 2: n = 117). Trainees were already experienced in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Results:  Preoperative variables were comparable. There was no significant difference in the rate of MACCEs between the two groups including hospital mortality (p = 1.000), perioperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.246), stroke (p = 0.655), and acute renal failure (p = 0.175).

Conclusion:  The early postoperative outcome of off-pump LIMA to the LAD performed by trainees was comparable to those by experienced surgeons. Single LIMA-LAD was safely performed by trainees under supervision without CPB. In order to master OPCAB technique, single LAD bypass might be a reasonable first step to get into touch with the technical characteristics of this special procedure.

背景:通过之前的大规模研究,人们已经认识到外科医生的经验对体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)的结果有重要影响。然而,安全、有效和具体的 OPCAB 培训尚未确定。作为合理的第一步,我们评估了单条 LIMA-LAD OPCAB 培训模式的安全性:方法:2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月间,180 例经胸骨正中切口使用 LIMA 作为原位移植的 LAD 孤立单支冠状动脉搭桥术患者符合纳入标准。心肺旁路下冠状动脉搭桥术、使用其他移植物材料、通过左侧胸廓切开术进行微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术、多支冠状动脉病变等均不在纳入之列。主要结果是在指导下接受培训的住院医师(第一组:63 人)和经验丰富的外科医生(第二组:117 人)之间的术后早期结果(MACCE:心肌梗死、冠状动脉再通、中风、急性肾功能衰竭和所有死亡原因)。受训者在体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术方面经验丰富:结果:术前变量具有可比性。结果:术前变量具有可比性,两组间的 MACCE 事件发生率无明显差异,包括住院死亡率(P=1.000)、围术期心肌梗死(P=0.246)、中风(P=0.655)和急性肾功能衰竭(P=0.175):结论:由受训者实施的LIMA-LAD泵术后早期疗效与经验丰富的外科医生相当。在没有心肺旁路的情况下,受训者可在监护下安全地进行单次LIMA-LAD手术。为了掌握 OPCAB 技术,单一 LAD 旁路可能是了解这种特殊手术技术特点的合理的第一步。
{"title":"Is Single LIMA-LAD Bypass Appropriate for OPCAB Training?","authors":"Shiho Naito, Hermann Reichenspurner, Björn Sill","doi":"10.1055/a-2260-5218","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2260-5218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> A significant impact of surgeons' experience on outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) has been recognized through previous large-scale studies. However, a safe, effective, and concrete OPCAB training was yet to be identified. We evaluate a safety of our OPCAB training model with single left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-left anterior descending artery (LAD) as a reasonable first step.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Between January 2010 and June 2019, 180 patients with an isolated single coronary bypass of the LAD using LIMA as an in situ graft via median sternotomy fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Coronary arterial bypass under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), utilizing other graft material, minimal invasive direct coronary arterial bypass through left-sided thoracotomy, and multiple diseased coronary artery disease were excluded. The primary outcome is an early postoperative outcome (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCEs]: myocardial infarction, coronary re-revascularization, stroke, acute renal failure, and all causes of death) between residents in training under supervision (group 1: <i>n</i> = 63) and experienced surgeons (group 2: <i>n</i> = 117). Trainees were already experienced in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Preoperative variables were comparable. There was no significant difference in the rate of MACCEs between the two groups including hospital mortality (<i>p</i> = 1.000), perioperative myocardial infarction (<i>p</i> = 0.246), stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.655), and acute renal failure (<i>p</i> = 0.175).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The early postoperative outcome of off-pump LIMA to the LAD performed by trainees was comparable to those by experienced surgeons. Single LIMA-LAD was safely performed by trainees under supervision without CPB. In order to master OPCAB technique, single LAD bypass might be a reasonable first step to get into touch with the technical characteristics of this special procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"458-462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139672757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Five-Year Survival of Patients Treated with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB) Compared with the General Swiss Population. 采用微创冠状动脉直接搭桥术 (MIDCAB) 治疗的患者与瑞士普通人群的五年生存率比较。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-12 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768035
Oliver Reuthebuch, Alina Stein, Luca Koechlin, Brigitta Gahl, Denis Berdajs, David Santer, Friedrich Eckstein

Background:  To evaluate the midterm follow-up and 5-year survival outcome of the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedure compared with the survival of the general Swiss population.

Methods:  Retrospective study on preoperative data, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcome of patients who underwent MIDCAB surgery between June 2010 and February 2019. To assess validity of this surgical therapy, outcomes were compared with survival data of a gender- and age-matched cohort of the general Swiss population taken from the database of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office.

Results:  A total of 88 patients were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR[) age was 66 (56-75) years, and 27% (n = 24) were female. The median (IQR) length of the in-hospital stay was 7 (6-8) days. No postoperative stroke occurred. The 30-day mortality was 1.1% (n = 1). Reintervention for failed left internal mammary artery was needed in 1.1% (n = 1). The median (IQR) ejection fraction was 58% (47-60) preoperatively and remained stable during follow-up. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 3 (1.1-5.2) years. Five years postoperatively, 83% (confidence interval, 69-91) of the patients were alive, showing an overlap with the range of survival of the matched subcohort of the general Swiss population (range, 84-100%).

Conclusion:  Though suffering from coronary heart disease, patients after MIDCAB show almost equal survival rates as an equivalent subcohort corresponding to the general Swiss population matched on age and gender. Thus, our data show this treatment to be safe and beneficial.

背景:评估微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术(MIDCAB)的中期随访和5年生存率:评估微创冠状动脉直接搭桥术(MIDCAB)的中期随访和5年生存结果,并与瑞士普通人群的生存情况进行比较:方法:对2010年6月至2019年2月期间接受MIDCAB手术的患者的术前数据、术中数据和术后结果进行回顾性研究。为评估该手术疗法的有效性,将结果与瑞士联邦统计局数据库中性别和年龄匹配的瑞士普通人群的生存数据进行了比较:结果:共纳入 88 名患者。年龄中位数(四分位数间距[IQR])为66(56-75)岁,27%(n = 24)为女性。住院时间中位数(IQR)为7(6-8)天。术后未发生中风。30天死亡率为1.1%(n = 1)。1.1%(n = 1)的患者因左乳内动脉手术失败而需要再次手术。术前射血分数中位数(IQR)为 58% (47-60),随访期间保持稳定。中位(IQR)随访时间为 3 (1.1-5.2) 年。术后五年,83%(置信区间,69-91)的患者存活,与瑞士普通人群中匹配子群的存活率范围(84%-100%)相吻合:结论:尽管患有冠心病,但接受 MIDCAB 手术的患者的存活率几乎与年龄和性别匹配的瑞士普通人群中的同等亚群存活率相同。因此,我们的数据表明这种治疗方法是安全和有益的。
{"title":"Five-Year Survival of Patients Treated with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB) Compared with the General Swiss Population.","authors":"Oliver Reuthebuch, Alina Stein, Luca Koechlin, Brigitta Gahl, Denis Berdajs, David Santer, Friedrich Eckstein","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768035","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1768035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> To evaluate the midterm follow-up and 5-year survival outcome of the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedure compared with the survival of the general Swiss population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Retrospective study on preoperative data, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcome of patients who underwent MIDCAB surgery between June 2010 and February 2019. To assess validity of this surgical therapy, outcomes were compared with survival data of a gender- and age-matched cohort of the general Swiss population taken from the database of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 88 patients were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR[) age was 66 (56-75) years, and 27% (<i>n</i> = 24) were female. The median (IQR) length of the in-hospital stay was 7 (6-8) days. No postoperative stroke occurred. The 30-day mortality was 1.1% (<i>n</i> = 1). Reintervention for failed left internal mammary artery was needed in 1.1% (<i>n</i> = 1). The median (IQR) ejection fraction was 58% (47-60) preoperatively and remained stable during follow-up. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 3 (1.1-5.2) years. Five years postoperatively, 83% (confidence interval, 69-91) of the patients were alive, showing an overlap with the range of survival of the matched subcohort of the general Swiss population (range, 84-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Though suffering from coronary heart disease, patients after MIDCAB show almost equal survival rates as an equivalent subcohort corresponding to the general Swiss population matched on age and gender. Thus, our data show this treatment to be safe and beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"404-412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9295468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comments on "Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting". 关于 "非体外循环与体外循环心脏搏动性冠状动脉置换术的比较 "的评论。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI: 10.1055/a-2267-8640
Christos Voucharas, Georgios Tagarakis
{"title":"Comments on \"Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting\".","authors":"Christos Voucharas, Georgios Tagarakis","doi":"10.1055/a-2267-8640","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2267-8640","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139736250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to Letter to the Editor. 回复致编辑的信。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-23 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787843
Shiho Naito, Hermann Reichenspurner, Björn Sill
{"title":"Reply to Letter to the Editor.","authors":"Shiho Naito, Hermann Reichenspurner, Björn Sill","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787843","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1787843","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simultaneous Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Lung Resection. 同时进行微创冠状动脉搭桥术和肺切除术。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.1055/a-2184-6624
Jiang Lianyong, Gao Pengkai, Zhang Xuefeng, Ding Fangbao, Liu Hao

Background:  The best surgical treatment strategy for coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) and lung cancer (LC) remains controversial. This study analyzed the safety and efficacy of a simultaneous minimally invasive procedure for patients with CAD and LC.

Methods:  Patients who underwent simultaneous minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and lung resection from January 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure was performed in the fourth intercostal space through a small left anterolateral minithoracotomy. Harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and sewing of the anastomoses were performed under direct vision. Lung resections were performed with or without the assistance of a thoracoscope.

Results:  Sixteen patients were included with a mean age of 67.13 ± 10.61 years. Procedural success occurred in all patients with a mean operative time of 366.88 ± 94.48 minutes. All patients received at least one coronary artery bypass LIMA graft. Pneumonectomy, lobectomy, segment resection, and wedge resection were performed in one (6.25%), eight (50%), two (12.5%), and five (31.25%) patients, respectively. There were no perioperative deaths or new myocardial infarctions. Complications included one case of postoperative bleeding, two lung infections, two cases of atelectasis, one case of pleural effusion, and one case of cardiac arrhythmia. All the patients were followed up for 1 to 57 months, cancer recurrence occurred in two patients, and one patient died. The remaining patients showed no evidence of tumor recurrence or myocardial infarction.

Conclusion:  This simultaneous minimally invasive procedure is safe and effective for selected patients with CAD and LC.

背景:癌症与冠状动脉疾病并存的最佳手术治疗策略仍然存在争议。本研究分析了同时微创手术治疗冠心病和肺癌癌症患者的安全性和有效性。方法:对2016年1月至2021年12月同时接受微创非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术和肺切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。手术在第四肋间通过小的左前外侧小切口进行。左胸内动脉(LIMA)的采集和吻合口的缝合在直视下进行。肺切除术是在有或没有胸腔镜辅助下进行的。结果:纳入16例患者,平均年龄67.13±10.61岁。所有患者的手术均取得成功,平均手术时间为366.88±94.48分钟。所有患者均接受了至少一次冠状动脉搭桥LIMA移植物。分别对1例(6.25%)、8例(50%)、2例(12.5%)和5例(31.25%)患者进行了肺切除、肺叶切除、节段切除和楔形切除。无围手术期死亡或新发心肌梗死。并发症包括术后出血1例,肺部感染2例,肺不张2例,胸腔积液1例,心律失常1例。术后随访1~57个月,癌症复发2例,死亡1例。其余患者没有肿瘤复发或心肌梗死的迹象。结论:同时微创手术对选择冠心病和肺癌癌症患者是安全有效的。
{"title":"Simultaneous Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Lung Resection.","authors":"Jiang Lianyong, Gao Pengkai, Zhang Xuefeng, Ding Fangbao, Liu Hao","doi":"10.1055/a-2184-6624","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2184-6624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The best surgical treatment strategy for coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) and lung cancer (LC) remains controversial. This study analyzed the safety and efficacy of a simultaneous minimally invasive procedure for patients with CAD and LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients who underwent simultaneous minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and lung resection from January 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure was performed in the fourth intercostal space through a small left anterolateral minithoracotomy. Harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and sewing of the anastomoses were performed under direct vision. Lung resections were performed with or without the assistance of a thoracoscope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Sixteen patients were included with a mean age of 67.13 ± 10.61 years. Procedural success occurred in all patients with a mean operative time of 366.88 ± 94.48 minutes. All patients received at least one coronary artery bypass LIMA graft. Pneumonectomy, lobectomy, segment resection, and wedge resection were performed in one (6.25%), eight (50%), two (12.5%), and five (31.25%) patients, respectively. There were no perioperative deaths or new myocardial infarctions. Complications included one case of postoperative bleeding, two lung infections, two cases of atelectasis, one case of pleural effusion, and one case of cardiac arrhythmia. All the patients were followed up for 1 to 57 months, cancer recurrence occurred in two patients, and one patient died. The remaining patients showed no evidence of tumor recurrence or myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This simultaneous minimally invasive procedure is safe and effective for selected patients with CAD and LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"435-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41149190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Continuous Analgesia with Intercostal Catheterization after Thoracoscopy. 胸腔镜检查后肋间置管持续镇痛。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-06 DOI: 10.1055/a-2168-9081
Yifei Wang, Qi Sun, Yiling Huang, Qinghua Yang, Rong Chen, Xianwei Zhang, Xuewei Zhao, Mingdong Wang

Background:  There are few studies on continuous intercostal nerve block after single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery, that is, two-port thoracoscopic surgery.

Objective:  To evaluate the analgesic effect of continuous intercostal nerve block after thoracoscopic surgery.

Methods:  A total of 80 patients who underwent single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery in our hospital between September 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled and divided into two groups. Based on basic analgesia, an intercostal catheter was placed during the operation for continuous intercostal block analgesia after the operation in the experimental group (group A, n = 40). The control group (group B, n = 40) was treated with sufentanil intravenous analgesia after surgery, which is namely "basic analgesia." The postoperative pain scores, restlessness during the recovery period, effect on reducing opioid use, postoperative chest complications, patient satisfaction, etc., were compared between the two groups.

Results:  The pain scores of patients in group A were significantly lower compared with those in group B at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery (3.325 ± 1.163 vs. 4.550 ± 1.176, 2.650 ± 1.001 vs. 4.000 ± 1.038, 2.325 ± 0.917 vs. 3.700 ± 0.966, and 1.775 ± 1.050 vs. 3.150 ± 1.075, p < 0.001, respectively). Sufentanil consumption in group A was significantly lower than in group B at 48 hours after surgery (98.625 ± 4.158 vs. 106.000 ± 7.228, p < 0.001).

Conclusion:  Multimodal analgesia is ideal for early pain control after thoracotomy. A continuous intercostal nerve block can effectively reduce postoperative pain in patients.

背景: 关于单孔胸腔镜手术后连续肋间神经阻滞的研究较少,即两口胸腔镜手术。目标: 评价胸腔镜手术后肋间神经连续阻滞的镇痛效果。方法: 在2020年9月至2021年6月期间,共有80名患者在我院接受了单孔胸腔镜手术,并将其分为两组。实验组在基础镇痛的基础上,术中放置肋间导管,术后持续肋间阻滞镇痛(A组,n = 40)。对照组(B组,n = 40)术后应用舒芬太尼静脉镇痛,即“基础镇痛”。比较两组术后疼痛评分、恢复期躁动、减少阿片类药物使用的效果、术后胸部并发症、患者满意度等。结果: A组患者在12、24、36和48岁时的疼痛评分明显低于B组 手术后数小时(3.325 ± 1.163对4.550 ± 1.176、2.650 ± 1.001对4.000 ± 1.038、2.325 ± 0.917对3.700 ± 0.966和1.775 ± 1.050对3.150 ± 1.075,p p 结论: 多模式镇痛是开胸术后早期疼痛控制的理想方法。持续的肋间神经阻滞可以有效地减轻患者的术后疼痛。
{"title":"Continuous Analgesia with Intercostal Catheterization after Thoracoscopy.","authors":"Yifei Wang, Qi Sun, Yiling Huang, Qinghua Yang, Rong Chen, Xianwei Zhang, Xuewei Zhao, Mingdong Wang","doi":"10.1055/a-2168-9081","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2168-9081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> There are few studies on continuous intercostal nerve block after single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery, that is, two-port thoracoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To evaluate the analgesic effect of continuous intercostal nerve block after thoracoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A total of 80 patients who underwent single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery in our hospital between September 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled and divided into two groups. Based on basic analgesia, an intercostal catheter was placed during the operation for continuous intercostal block analgesia after the operation in the experimental group (group A, <i>n</i> = 40). The control group (group B, <i>n</i> = 40) was treated with sufentanil intravenous analgesia after surgery, which is namely \"basic analgesia.\" The postoperative pain scores, restlessness during the recovery period, effect on reducing opioid use, postoperative chest complications, patient satisfaction, etc., were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The pain scores of patients in group A were significantly lower compared with those in group B at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery (3.325 ± 1.163 vs. 4.550 ± 1.176, 2.650 ± 1.001 vs. 4.000 ± 1.038, 2.325 ± 0.917 vs. 3.700 ± 0.966, and 1.775 ± 1.050 vs. 3.150 ± 1.075, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). Sufentanil consumption in group A was significantly lower than in group B at 48 hours after surgery (98.625 ± 4.158 vs. 106.000 ± 7.228, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Multimodal analgesia is ideal for early pain control after thoracotomy. A continuous intercostal nerve block can effectively reduce postoperative pain in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"476-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10169386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical Myocardial Revascularization with a Composite T-graft from the Left Internal Mammary Artery-Comparison of the Great Saphenous Vein with the Radial Artery. 使用左乳内动脉复合 T 型移植进行心肌血管重建手术--大隐静脉与桡动脉的比较
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771358
Arne Eide, Jill Jussli-Melchers, Christine Friedrich, Assad Haneya, Georg Lutter, Jochen Cremer, Jan Schoettler
<p><strong>Background: </strong> Composite T-grafts between left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and radial artery (RA) are a common concept in complete arterial myocardial revascularization. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the use of the great saphenous vein (SV) instead of RA leads to comparably good results in terms of outcome in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients who underwent myocardial revascularization with a T-graft using RA or a segment of SV to the right coronary artery or circumflex artery between the beginning of 2014 and the end of 2019 at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel were included. To minimize surgical variation, only patients were observed by a single senior surgeon in the department. Exclusion criteria were previous cardiac surgery, preoperative extracorporeal circulatory support, off-pump surgery, additional aortocoronary bypasses, and cardiac combination procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 115 patients were studied. In 55 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and SV, and in 60 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and RA. Patients in the SV group were older (70.6 ± 7.8 vs. 58.5 ± 10.0 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001), suffered more frequently from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (12.7 vs. 1.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.027), arterial hypertension (83.6 vs. 61.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.009), and atrial fibrillation (18.2 vs. 1.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.003). They were less likely to be active smokers (16.4 vs. 38.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and less likely to have a history of variceal surgery (0 vs. 15.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.003). Calcification of the ascending aorta was also found more frequently in the saphenous group (18.2 vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Operative times and number of distal anastomoses did not differ significantly between the two groups. Postoperative deliriums (16.7 vs. 5.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.043) were observed more frequently in venous patients. Wound healing disorders of the leg (11.1 vs. 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.011) did only occur in SV group and wound infections of the arm only in the RA group. Complete follow-up was achieved in 74.8% of cases. Median follow-up was 60.3 (39.6; 73.2) months. Serious adverse cardiac-cerebral events (19.0 vs. 22.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.675) and mortality (14.5 vs. 6.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.167) did not differ significantly between the groups at follow-up. Myocardial infarction (0 vs. 2.5%; <i>p</i> = 1.000) and stroke (0 vs. 7.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.245) were observed exclusively in RA group. Percutaneous coronary intervention was required in single patients of RA group (0 vs. 15.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.028). No patient from either group underwent repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The patients of SV group had angiographically competent grafts and open anastomoses. Graft failure was noted in a single patient in RA group, in which case both grafts and native coronary vessels were stented. Kaplan
背景:左乳内动脉(LIMA)和桡动脉(RA)之间的复合 T 型移植物是完全动脉心肌血运重建的常见概念。本研究旨在探讨在这种情况下使用大隐静脉(SV)代替 RA 是否会带来相当好的疗效:方法:纳入2014年初至2019年底期间在基尔校区石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因大学医院心血管外科使用RA或一段SV至右冠状动脉或环状动脉进行T移植的心肌血管重建术患者。为尽量减少手术差异,只有一名资深外科医生对患者进行了观察。排除标准包括既往接受过心脏手术、术前体外循环支持、非泵手术、额外的主动脉冠状动脉搭桥术和心脏联合手术:共有 115 名患者接受了研究。55例患者的T型血管移植物被置于LIMA和SV之间,60例患者的T型血管移植物被置于LIMA和RA之间。SV 组患者年龄较大(70.6 ± 7.8 岁 vs. 58.5 ± 10.0 岁;P = 0.027)、动脉高血压(83.6% vs. 61.7%;P = 0.009)和心房颤动(18.2% vs. 1.7%;P = 0.003)。他们较少主动吸烟(16.4% 对 38.3%;P = 0.009),较少有静脉曲张手术史(0 对 15.0%;P = 0.003)。大隐静脉组的升主动脉钙化发生率也更高(18.2% 对 3.3%,P = 0.009)。两组的手术时间和远端吻合次数没有显著差异。静脉患者术后谵妄的发生率更高(16.7% 对 5.0%;P = 0.043)。腿部伤口愈合障碍(11.1% 对 0%;p = 0.011)仅发生在 SV 组,而手臂伤口感染仅发生在 RA 组。74.8%的病例实现了完全随访。中位随访时间为 60.3 (39.6; 73.2) 个月。随访期间,严重不良心脑事件(19.0 vs. 22.7%; p = 0.675)和死亡率(14.5 vs. 6.7%; p = 0.167)在各组间无显著差异。心肌梗死(0 对 2.5%;p = 1.000)和中风(0 对 7.5%;p = 0.245)仅见于 RA 组。只有 RA 组患者需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(0 对 15.0%;P = 0.028)。两组患者均未再次接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。SV 组患者的移植物血管造影合格,吻合口开放。RA 组有一名患者出现移植物失败,在这种情况下,移植物和原生冠状血管都被植入了支架。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与RA组相比,SV组的存活率没有明显劣势:结论:在 LIMA 和一段 SV 之间进行复合 T 型移植物的 CABG 与在 LIMA 和 RA 之间进行复合 T 型移植物的搭桥手术效果相当。就中期观察期的发病率和死亡率而言,这可能是真实的。我们的研究结果提出了一个假设,即决定不进行主动脉旁路吻合术可能比选择移植材料更重要。
{"title":"Surgical Myocardial Revascularization with a Composite T-graft from the Left Internal Mammary Artery-Comparison of the Great Saphenous Vein with the Radial Artery.","authors":"Arne Eide, Jill Jussli-Melchers, Christine Friedrich, Assad Haneya, Georg Lutter, Jochen Cremer, Jan Schoettler","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771358","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771358","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt; Composite T-grafts between left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and radial artery (RA) are a common concept in complete arterial myocardial revascularization. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the use of the great saphenous vein (SV) instead of RA leads to comparably good results in terms of outcome in this context.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt; Patients who underwent myocardial revascularization with a T-graft using RA or a segment of SV to the right coronary artery or circumflex artery between the beginning of 2014 and the end of 2019 at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel were included. To minimize surgical variation, only patients were observed by a single senior surgeon in the department. Exclusion criteria were previous cardiac surgery, preoperative extracorporeal circulatory support, off-pump surgery, additional aortocoronary bypasses, and cardiac combination procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt; A total of 115 patients were studied. In 55 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and SV, and in 60 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and RA. Patients in the SV group were older (70.6 ± 7.8 vs. 58.5 ± 10.0 years; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001), suffered more frequently from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (12.7 vs. 1.7%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.027), arterial hypertension (83.6 vs. 61.7%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.009), and atrial fibrillation (18.2 vs. 1.7%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.003). They were less likely to be active smokers (16.4 vs. 38.3%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.009) and less likely to have a history of variceal surgery (0 vs. 15.0%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.003). Calcification of the ascending aorta was also found more frequently in the saphenous group (18.2 vs. 3.3%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.009). Operative times and number of distal anastomoses did not differ significantly between the two groups. Postoperative deliriums (16.7 vs. 5.0%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.043) were observed more frequently in venous patients. Wound healing disorders of the leg (11.1 vs. 0%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.011) did only occur in SV group and wound infections of the arm only in the RA group. Complete follow-up was achieved in 74.8% of cases. Median follow-up was 60.3 (39.6; 73.2) months. Serious adverse cardiac-cerebral events (19.0 vs. 22.7%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.675) and mortality (14.5 vs. 6.7%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.167) did not differ significantly between the groups at follow-up. Myocardial infarction (0 vs. 2.5%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 1.000) and stroke (0 vs. 7.5%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.245) were observed exclusively in RA group. Percutaneous coronary intervention was required in single patients of RA group (0 vs. 15.0%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.028). No patient from either group underwent repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The patients of SV group had angiographically competent grafts and open anastomoses. Graft failure was noted in a single patient in RA group, in which case both grafts and native coronary vessels were stented. Kaplan","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"413-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10246332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comments on "Is Single LIMA-LAD Bypass Appropriate for OPCAB Training?" 关于 "单条 LIMA-LAD 搭桥术是否适合 OPCAB 训练?
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-23 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787842
Christos Voucharas, Georgios Tagarakis
{"title":"Comments on \"Is Single LIMA-LAD Bypass Appropriate for OPCAB Training?\"","authors":"Christos Voucharas, Georgios Tagarakis","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787842","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1787842","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Myocardial Viability on Long-term Outcomes after Surgical Revascularization. 心肌活力对手术血管重建后长期疗效的影响
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-13 DOI: 10.1055/a-2228-7104
Suk Ho Sohn, Yoonjin Kang, Ji Seong Kim, Eun-Ah Park, Whal Lee, Ho Young Hwang

Background:  This study was conducted to evaluate whether myocardial viability assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) affected long-term clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP).

Methods:  Preoperative CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed in 103 patients (64.9 ± 10.1 years, male:female = 82:21) with 3-vessel disease and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤ 0.35). Transmural extent of LGE was evaluated on a 16-segment model, and transmurality was graded on a 5-point scale: grades-0, absence; 1, 1 to 25%; 2, 26 to 50%; 3, 51 to 75%; 4, 76 to 100%. Median follow-up duration was 65.5 months (interquartile range = 27.5-95.3 months). Primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

Results:  Operative mortality was 1.9%. During the follow-up, all-cause mortality and readmission for congestive heart failure occurred in 29 and 8 patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was 31.3 and 46.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the number of segments with LGE grade 4 was a significant risk factor (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.83, p = 0.007) for the primary endpoint among the variables assessed by CMR. Other risk factors included age, dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and EuroSCORE II.

Conclusion:  The number of myocardial segments with transmurality of LGE >75% might be a prognostic factor associated with the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure after CABG in patients with 3-vessel disease and ICMP.

研究背景本研究旨在评估心脏磁共振评估的心肌活力是否会影响缺血性心肌病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后的长期临床预后:方法:对103例(64.9±10.1岁,男女比例为82:21)患有三支血管疾病和左心室功能障碍(射血分数≤0.35)的患者进行术前心脏磁共振晚期钆增强(LGE)检查。LGE的透壁范围在16段模型上进行评估,透壁性按5级评分:0级,无;1级,1%-25%;2级,26%-50%;3级,51%-75%;4级,76%-100%。中位随访时间为 65.5 个月(四分位间范围 = 27.5-95.3 个月)。主要终点为全因死亡率或因充血性心力衰竭住院的复合终点:结果:手术死亡率为1.9%。随访期间,分别有29名和8名患者因全因死亡和充血性心力衰竭再次入院。5年和10年后,主要终点的累积发生率分别为31.3%和46.8%。多变量分析表明,在心脏磁共振评估的变量中,LGE 4 级的节段数是主要终点的重要风险因素(危险比 1.42,95% 置信区间 1.10-1.83,P =.007)。其他风险因素包括年龄、透析、慢性阻塞性肺病和EuroSCORE II:结论:LGE透射率大于75%的心肌节段数量可能是与三血管疾病和缺血性心肌病患者接受CABG手术后全因死亡或因充血性心力衰竭住院的综合结果相关的预后因素。
{"title":"Impact of Myocardial Viability on Long-term Outcomes after Surgical Revascularization.","authors":"Suk Ho Sohn, Yoonjin Kang, Ji Seong Kim, Eun-Ah Park, Whal Lee, Ho Young Hwang","doi":"10.1055/a-2228-7104","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2228-7104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> This study was conducted to evaluate whether myocardial viability assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) affected long-term clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Preoperative CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed in 103 patients (64.9 ± 10.1 years, male:female = 82:21) with 3-vessel disease and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤ 0.35). Transmural extent of LGE was evaluated on a 16-segment model, and transmurality was graded on a 5-point scale: grades-0, absence; 1, 1 to 25%; 2, 26 to 50%; 3, 51 to 75%; 4, 76 to 100%. Median follow-up duration was 65.5 months (interquartile range = 27.5-95.3 months). Primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Operative mortality was 1.9%. During the follow-up, all-cause mortality and readmission for congestive heart failure occurred in 29 and 8 patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was 31.3 and 46.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the number of segments with LGE grade 4 was a significant risk factor (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.83, <i>p</i> = 0.007) for the primary endpoint among the variables assessed by CMR. Other risk factors included age, dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and EuroSCORE II.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The number of myocardial segments with transmurality of LGE >75% might be a prognostic factor associated with the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure after CABG in patients with 3-vessel disease and ICMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"441-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138802301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1