Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2023-04-12DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768035
Oliver Reuthebuch, Alina Stein, Luca Koechlin, Brigitta Gahl, Denis Berdajs, David Santer, Friedrich Eckstein
Background: To evaluate the midterm follow-up and 5-year survival outcome of the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedure compared with the survival of the general Swiss population.
Methods: Retrospective study on preoperative data, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcome of patients who underwent MIDCAB surgery between June 2010 and February 2019. To assess validity of this surgical therapy, outcomes were compared with survival data of a gender- and age-matched cohort of the general Swiss population taken from the database of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office.
Results: A total of 88 patients were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR[) age was 66 (56-75) years, and 27% (n = 24) were female. The median (IQR) length of the in-hospital stay was 7 (6-8) days. No postoperative stroke occurred. The 30-day mortality was 1.1% (n = 1). Reintervention for failed left internal mammary artery was needed in 1.1% (n = 1). The median (IQR) ejection fraction was 58% (47-60) preoperatively and remained stable during follow-up. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 3 (1.1-5.2) years. Five years postoperatively, 83% (confidence interval, 69-91) of the patients were alive, showing an overlap with the range of survival of the matched subcohort of the general Swiss population (range, 84-100%).
Conclusion: Though suffering from coronary heart disease, patients after MIDCAB show almost equal survival rates as an equivalent subcohort corresponding to the general Swiss population matched on age and gender. Thus, our data show this treatment to be safe and beneficial.
{"title":"Five-Year Survival of Patients Treated with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB) Compared with the General Swiss Population.","authors":"Oliver Reuthebuch, Alina Stein, Luca Koechlin, Brigitta Gahl, Denis Berdajs, David Santer, Friedrich Eckstein","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768035","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1768035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> To evaluate the midterm follow-up and 5-year survival outcome of the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedure compared with the survival of the general Swiss population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Retrospective study on preoperative data, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcome of patients who underwent MIDCAB surgery between June 2010 and February 2019. To assess validity of this surgical therapy, outcomes were compared with survival data of a gender- and age-matched cohort of the general Swiss population taken from the database of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 88 patients were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR[) age was 66 (56-75) years, and 27% (<i>n</i> = 24) were female. The median (IQR) length of the in-hospital stay was 7 (6-8) days. No postoperative stroke occurred. The 30-day mortality was 1.1% (<i>n</i> = 1). Reintervention for failed left internal mammary artery was needed in 1.1% (<i>n</i> = 1). The median (IQR) ejection fraction was 58% (47-60) preoperatively and remained stable during follow-up. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 3 (1.1-5.2) years. Five years postoperatively, 83% (confidence interval, 69-91) of the patients were alive, showing an overlap with the range of survival of the matched subcohort of the general Swiss population (range, 84-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Though suffering from coronary heart disease, patients after MIDCAB show almost equal survival rates as an equivalent subcohort corresponding to the general Swiss population matched on age and gender. Thus, our data show this treatment to be safe and beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"404-412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9295468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-23DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787843
Shiho Naito, Hermann Reichenspurner, Björn Sill
{"title":"Reply to Letter to the Editor.","authors":"Shiho Naito, Hermann Reichenspurner, Björn Sill","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787843","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1787843","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2023-09-29DOI: 10.1055/a-2184-6624
Jiang Lianyong, Gao Pengkai, Zhang Xuefeng, Ding Fangbao, Liu Hao
Background: The best surgical treatment strategy for coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) and lung cancer (LC) remains controversial. This study analyzed the safety and efficacy of a simultaneous minimally invasive procedure for patients with CAD and LC.
Methods: Patients who underwent simultaneous minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and lung resection from January 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure was performed in the fourth intercostal space through a small left anterolateral minithoracotomy. Harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and sewing of the anastomoses were performed under direct vision. Lung resections were performed with or without the assistance of a thoracoscope.
Results: Sixteen patients were included with a mean age of 67.13 ± 10.61 years. Procedural success occurred in all patients with a mean operative time of 366.88 ± 94.48 minutes. All patients received at least one coronary artery bypass LIMA graft. Pneumonectomy, lobectomy, segment resection, and wedge resection were performed in one (6.25%), eight (50%), two (12.5%), and five (31.25%) patients, respectively. There were no perioperative deaths or new myocardial infarctions. Complications included one case of postoperative bleeding, two lung infections, two cases of atelectasis, one case of pleural effusion, and one case of cardiac arrhythmia. All the patients were followed up for 1 to 57 months, cancer recurrence occurred in two patients, and one patient died. The remaining patients showed no evidence of tumor recurrence or myocardial infarction.
Conclusion: This simultaneous minimally invasive procedure is safe and effective for selected patients with CAD and LC.
{"title":"Simultaneous Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Lung Resection.","authors":"Jiang Lianyong, Gao Pengkai, Zhang Xuefeng, Ding Fangbao, Liu Hao","doi":"10.1055/a-2184-6624","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2184-6624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The best surgical treatment strategy for coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) and lung cancer (LC) remains controversial. This study analyzed the safety and efficacy of a simultaneous minimally invasive procedure for patients with CAD and LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients who underwent simultaneous minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and lung resection from January 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure was performed in the fourth intercostal space through a small left anterolateral minithoracotomy. Harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and sewing of the anastomoses were performed under direct vision. Lung resections were performed with or without the assistance of a thoracoscope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Sixteen patients were included with a mean age of 67.13 ± 10.61 years. Procedural success occurred in all patients with a mean operative time of 366.88 ± 94.48 minutes. All patients received at least one coronary artery bypass LIMA graft. Pneumonectomy, lobectomy, segment resection, and wedge resection were performed in one (6.25%), eight (50%), two (12.5%), and five (31.25%) patients, respectively. There were no perioperative deaths or new myocardial infarctions. Complications included one case of postoperative bleeding, two lung infections, two cases of atelectasis, one case of pleural effusion, and one case of cardiac arrhythmia. All the patients were followed up for 1 to 57 months, cancer recurrence occurred in two patients, and one patient died. The remaining patients showed no evidence of tumor recurrence or myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This simultaneous minimally invasive procedure is safe and effective for selected patients with CAD and LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"435-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41149190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2023-09-06DOI: 10.1055/a-2168-9081
Yifei Wang, Qi Sun, Yiling Huang, Qinghua Yang, Rong Chen, Xianwei Zhang, Xuewei Zhao, Mingdong Wang
Background: There are few studies on continuous intercostal nerve block after single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery, that is, two-port thoracoscopic surgery.
Objective: To evaluate the analgesic effect of continuous intercostal nerve block after thoracoscopic surgery.
Methods: A total of 80 patients who underwent single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery in our hospital between September 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled and divided into two groups. Based on basic analgesia, an intercostal catheter was placed during the operation for continuous intercostal block analgesia after the operation in the experimental group (group A, n = 40). The control group (group B, n = 40) was treated with sufentanil intravenous analgesia after surgery, which is namely "basic analgesia." The postoperative pain scores, restlessness during the recovery period, effect on reducing opioid use, postoperative chest complications, patient satisfaction, etc., were compared between the two groups.
Results: The pain scores of patients in group A were significantly lower compared with those in group B at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery (3.325 ± 1.163 vs. 4.550 ± 1.176, 2.650 ± 1.001 vs. 4.000 ± 1.038, 2.325 ± 0.917 vs. 3.700 ± 0.966, and 1.775 ± 1.050 vs. 3.150 ± 1.075, p < 0.001, respectively). Sufentanil consumption in group A was significantly lower than in group B at 48 hours after surgery (98.625 ± 4.158 vs. 106.000 ± 7.228, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Multimodal analgesia is ideal for early pain control after thoracotomy. A continuous intercostal nerve block can effectively reduce postoperative pain in patients.
{"title":"Continuous Analgesia with Intercostal Catheterization after Thoracoscopy.","authors":"Yifei Wang, Qi Sun, Yiling Huang, Qinghua Yang, Rong Chen, Xianwei Zhang, Xuewei Zhao, Mingdong Wang","doi":"10.1055/a-2168-9081","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2168-9081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> There are few studies on continuous intercostal nerve block after single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery, that is, two-port thoracoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To evaluate the analgesic effect of continuous intercostal nerve block after thoracoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A total of 80 patients who underwent single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery in our hospital between September 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled and divided into two groups. Based on basic analgesia, an intercostal catheter was placed during the operation for continuous intercostal block analgesia after the operation in the experimental group (group A, <i>n</i> = 40). The control group (group B, <i>n</i> = 40) was treated with sufentanil intravenous analgesia after surgery, which is namely \"basic analgesia.\" The postoperative pain scores, restlessness during the recovery period, effect on reducing opioid use, postoperative chest complications, patient satisfaction, etc., were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The pain scores of patients in group A were significantly lower compared with those in group B at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery (3.325 ± 1.163 vs. 4.550 ± 1.176, 2.650 ± 1.001 vs. 4.000 ± 1.038, 2.325 ± 0.917 vs. 3.700 ± 0.966, and 1.775 ± 1.050 vs. 3.150 ± 1.075, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). Sufentanil consumption in group A was significantly lower than in group B at 48 hours after surgery (98.625 ± 4.158 vs. 106.000 ± 7.228, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Multimodal analgesia is ideal for early pain control after thoracotomy. A continuous intercostal nerve block can effectively reduce postoperative pain in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"476-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10169386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2023-07-28DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771358
Arne Eide, Jill Jussli-Melchers, Christine Friedrich, Assad Haneya, Georg Lutter, Jochen Cremer, Jan Schoettler
<p><strong>Background: </strong> Composite T-grafts between left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and radial artery (RA) are a common concept in complete arterial myocardial revascularization. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the use of the great saphenous vein (SV) instead of RA leads to comparably good results in terms of outcome in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients who underwent myocardial revascularization with a T-graft using RA or a segment of SV to the right coronary artery or circumflex artery between the beginning of 2014 and the end of 2019 at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel were included. To minimize surgical variation, only patients were observed by a single senior surgeon in the department. Exclusion criteria were previous cardiac surgery, preoperative extracorporeal circulatory support, off-pump surgery, additional aortocoronary bypasses, and cardiac combination procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 115 patients were studied. In 55 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and SV, and in 60 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and RA. Patients in the SV group were older (70.6 ± 7.8 vs. 58.5 ± 10.0 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001), suffered more frequently from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (12.7 vs. 1.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.027), arterial hypertension (83.6 vs. 61.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.009), and atrial fibrillation (18.2 vs. 1.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.003). They were less likely to be active smokers (16.4 vs. 38.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and less likely to have a history of variceal surgery (0 vs. 15.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.003). Calcification of the ascending aorta was also found more frequently in the saphenous group (18.2 vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Operative times and number of distal anastomoses did not differ significantly between the two groups. Postoperative deliriums (16.7 vs. 5.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.043) were observed more frequently in venous patients. Wound healing disorders of the leg (11.1 vs. 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.011) did only occur in SV group and wound infections of the arm only in the RA group. Complete follow-up was achieved in 74.8% of cases. Median follow-up was 60.3 (39.6; 73.2) months. Serious adverse cardiac-cerebral events (19.0 vs. 22.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.675) and mortality (14.5 vs. 6.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.167) did not differ significantly between the groups at follow-up. Myocardial infarction (0 vs. 2.5%; <i>p</i> = 1.000) and stroke (0 vs. 7.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.245) were observed exclusively in RA group. Percutaneous coronary intervention was required in single patients of RA group (0 vs. 15.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.028). No patient from either group underwent repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The patients of SV group had angiographically competent grafts and open anastomoses. Graft failure was noted in a single patient in RA group, in which case both grafts and native coronary vessels were stented. Kaplan
背景:左乳内动脉(LIMA)和桡动脉(RA)之间的复合 T 型移植物是完全动脉心肌血运重建的常见概念。本研究旨在探讨在这种情况下使用大隐静脉(SV)代替 RA 是否会带来相当好的疗效:方法:纳入2014年初至2019年底期间在基尔校区石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因大学医院心血管外科使用RA或一段SV至右冠状动脉或环状动脉进行T移植的心肌血管重建术患者。为尽量减少手术差异,只有一名资深外科医生对患者进行了观察。排除标准包括既往接受过心脏手术、术前体外循环支持、非泵手术、额外的主动脉冠状动脉搭桥术和心脏联合手术:共有 115 名患者接受了研究。55例患者的T型血管移植物被置于LIMA和SV之间,60例患者的T型血管移植物被置于LIMA和RA之间。SV 组患者年龄较大(70.6 ± 7.8 岁 vs. 58.5 ± 10.0 岁;P = 0.027)、动脉高血压(83.6% vs. 61.7%;P = 0.009)和心房颤动(18.2% vs. 1.7%;P = 0.003)。他们较少主动吸烟(16.4% 对 38.3%;P = 0.009),较少有静脉曲张手术史(0 对 15.0%;P = 0.003)。大隐静脉组的升主动脉钙化发生率也更高(18.2% 对 3.3%,P = 0.009)。两组的手术时间和远端吻合次数没有显著差异。静脉患者术后谵妄的发生率更高(16.7% 对 5.0%;P = 0.043)。腿部伤口愈合障碍(11.1% 对 0%;p = 0.011)仅发生在 SV 组,而手臂伤口感染仅发生在 RA 组。74.8%的病例实现了完全随访。中位随访时间为 60.3 (39.6; 73.2) 个月。随访期间,严重不良心脑事件(19.0 vs. 22.7%; p = 0.675)和死亡率(14.5 vs. 6.7%; p = 0.167)在各组间无显著差异。心肌梗死(0 对 2.5%;p = 1.000)和中风(0 对 7.5%;p = 0.245)仅见于 RA 组。只有 RA 组患者需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(0 对 15.0%;P = 0.028)。两组患者均未再次接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。SV 组患者的移植物血管造影合格,吻合口开放。RA 组有一名患者出现移植物失败,在这种情况下,移植物和原生冠状血管都被植入了支架。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与RA组相比,SV组的存活率没有明显劣势:结论:在 LIMA 和一段 SV 之间进行复合 T 型移植物的 CABG 与在 LIMA 和 RA 之间进行复合 T 型移植物的搭桥手术效果相当。就中期观察期的发病率和死亡率而言,这可能是真实的。我们的研究结果提出了一个假设,即决定不进行主动脉旁路吻合术可能比选择移植材料更重要。
{"title":"Surgical Myocardial Revascularization with a Composite T-graft from the Left Internal Mammary Artery-Comparison of the Great Saphenous Vein with the Radial Artery.","authors":"Arne Eide, Jill Jussli-Melchers, Christine Friedrich, Assad Haneya, Georg Lutter, Jochen Cremer, Jan Schoettler","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771358","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771358","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Composite T-grafts between left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and radial artery (RA) are a common concept in complete arterial myocardial revascularization. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the use of the great saphenous vein (SV) instead of RA leads to comparably good results in terms of outcome in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients who underwent myocardial revascularization with a T-graft using RA or a segment of SV to the right coronary artery or circumflex artery between the beginning of 2014 and the end of 2019 at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel were included. To minimize surgical variation, only patients were observed by a single senior surgeon in the department. Exclusion criteria were previous cardiac surgery, preoperative extracorporeal circulatory support, off-pump surgery, additional aortocoronary bypasses, and cardiac combination procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 115 patients were studied. In 55 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and SV, and in 60 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and RA. Patients in the SV group were older (70.6 ± 7.8 vs. 58.5 ± 10.0 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001), suffered more frequently from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (12.7 vs. 1.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.027), arterial hypertension (83.6 vs. 61.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.009), and atrial fibrillation (18.2 vs. 1.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.003). They were less likely to be active smokers (16.4 vs. 38.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and less likely to have a history of variceal surgery (0 vs. 15.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.003). Calcification of the ascending aorta was also found more frequently in the saphenous group (18.2 vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Operative times and number of distal anastomoses did not differ significantly between the two groups. Postoperative deliriums (16.7 vs. 5.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.043) were observed more frequently in venous patients. Wound healing disorders of the leg (11.1 vs. 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.011) did only occur in SV group and wound infections of the arm only in the RA group. Complete follow-up was achieved in 74.8% of cases. Median follow-up was 60.3 (39.6; 73.2) months. Serious adverse cardiac-cerebral events (19.0 vs. 22.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.675) and mortality (14.5 vs. 6.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.167) did not differ significantly between the groups at follow-up. Myocardial infarction (0 vs. 2.5%; <i>p</i> = 1.000) and stroke (0 vs. 7.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.245) were observed exclusively in RA group. Percutaneous coronary intervention was required in single patients of RA group (0 vs. 15.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.028). No patient from either group underwent repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The patients of SV group had angiographically competent grafts and open anastomoses. Graft failure was noted in a single patient in RA group, in which case both grafts and native coronary vessels were stented. Kaplan","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"413-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10246332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-23DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787842
Christos Voucharas, Georgios Tagarakis
{"title":"Comments on \"Is Single LIMA-LAD Bypass Appropriate for OPCAB Training?\"","authors":"Christos Voucharas, Georgios Tagarakis","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787842","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0044-1787842","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2023-12-13DOI: 10.1055/a-2228-7104
Suk Ho Sohn, Yoonjin Kang, Ji Seong Kim, Eun-Ah Park, Whal Lee, Ho Young Hwang
Background: This study was conducted to evaluate whether myocardial viability assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) affected long-term clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP).
Methods: Preoperative CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed in 103 patients (64.9 ± 10.1 years, male:female = 82:21) with 3-vessel disease and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤ 0.35). Transmural extent of LGE was evaluated on a 16-segment model, and transmurality was graded on a 5-point scale: grades-0, absence; 1, 1 to 25%; 2, 26 to 50%; 3, 51 to 75%; 4, 76 to 100%. Median follow-up duration was 65.5 months (interquartile range = 27.5-95.3 months). Primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure.
Results: Operative mortality was 1.9%. During the follow-up, all-cause mortality and readmission for congestive heart failure occurred in 29 and 8 patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was 31.3 and 46.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the number of segments with LGE grade 4 was a significant risk factor (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.83, p = 0.007) for the primary endpoint among the variables assessed by CMR. Other risk factors included age, dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and EuroSCORE II.
Conclusion: The number of myocardial segments with transmurality of LGE >75% might be a prognostic factor associated with the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure after CABG in patients with 3-vessel disease and ICMP.
{"title":"Impact of Myocardial Viability on Long-term Outcomes after Surgical Revascularization.","authors":"Suk Ho Sohn, Yoonjin Kang, Ji Seong Kim, Eun-Ah Park, Whal Lee, Ho Young Hwang","doi":"10.1055/a-2228-7104","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2228-7104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> This study was conducted to evaluate whether myocardial viability assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) affected long-term clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Preoperative CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed in 103 patients (64.9 ± 10.1 years, male:female = 82:21) with 3-vessel disease and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤ 0.35). Transmural extent of LGE was evaluated on a 16-segment model, and transmurality was graded on a 5-point scale: grades-0, absence; 1, 1 to 25%; 2, 26 to 50%; 3, 51 to 75%; 4, 76 to 100%. Median follow-up duration was 65.5 months (interquartile range = 27.5-95.3 months). Primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Operative mortality was 1.9%. During the follow-up, all-cause mortality and readmission for congestive heart failure occurred in 29 and 8 patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was 31.3 and 46.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the number of segments with LGE grade 4 was a significant risk factor (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.83, <i>p</i> = 0.007) for the primary endpoint among the variables assessed by CMR. Other risk factors included age, dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and EuroSCORE II.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The number of myocardial segments with transmurality of LGE >75% might be a prognostic factor associated with the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure after CABG in patients with 3-vessel disease and ICMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"441-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138802301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed via three different techniques, conventional, on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBHCAB), or off-pump CABG (OPCAB), data are limited to compare ONBHCAB with OPCAB.
Methods: We retrospectively investigated the postoperative cardiac biomarkers, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and troponin I (cTnI), and early and late outcomes in 806 patients undergoing isolated ONBHCAB or OPCAB between February 2008 and September 2022. To eliminate the bias between different groups, propensity score matching was conducted to validate the findings.
Results: After matching, the number of each study group totaled 270 patients. In both complete and matched cohorts, early outcomes, including morbidities and mortalities, were similar. However, cTnI and CK-MB levels were significantly higher after ONBHCAB than after OPCAB with median peak cTnI of 9.85 versus 4.60 ng/mL and median peak CK-MB of 48.45 versus 17.10 ng/mL in the matched cohort, which were quite low, below the threshold for values defining perioperative myocardial infarction. At follow-up of 73 ± 45 months, the overall actuarial survival rates were similar between the ONBHCAB and OPCAB patients (86 vs. 87% at 5 years and 64 vs. 68% at 10 years, respectively, in the matched cohort).
Conclusion: ONBHCAB may be a comparable alternative to OPCAB with similar early and late outcomes, despite higher elevation of postoperative cardiac biomarkers. ONBHCAB provides more efficient hemodynamic support, providing a better surgical visual field, than OPCAB while reducing the risk of incomplete revascularization.
{"title":"Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.","authors":"Kazuki Matsuhashi, Yoshiyuki Takami, Atsuo Maekawa, Koji Yamana, Kiyotoshi Akita, Kentaro Amano, Yasushi Takagi","doi":"10.1055/a-2239-1810","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2239-1810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed via three different techniques, conventional, on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBHCAB), or off-pump CABG (OPCAB), data are limited to compare ONBHCAB with OPCAB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We retrospectively investigated the postoperative cardiac biomarkers, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and troponin I (cTnI), and early and late outcomes in 806 patients undergoing isolated ONBHCAB or OPCAB between February 2008 and September 2022. To eliminate the bias between different groups, propensity score matching was conducted to validate the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> After matching, the number of each study group totaled 270 patients. In both complete and matched cohorts, early outcomes, including morbidities and mortalities, were similar. However, cTnI and CK-MB levels were significantly higher after ONBHCAB than after OPCAB with median peak cTnI of 9.85 versus 4.60 ng/mL and median peak CK-MB of 48.45 versus 17.10 ng/mL in the matched cohort, which were quite low, below the threshold for values defining perioperative myocardial infarction. At follow-up of 73 ± 45 months, the overall actuarial survival rates were similar between the ONBHCAB and OPCAB patients (86 vs. 87% at 5 years and 64 vs. 68% at 10 years, respectively, in the matched cohort).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> ONBHCAB may be a comparable alternative to OPCAB with similar early and late outcomes, despite higher elevation of postoperative cardiac biomarkers. ONBHCAB provides more efficient hemodynamic support, providing a better surgical visual field, than OPCAB while reducing the risk of incomplete revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"449-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139106711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Bronchoplastic resections are now widely used as a surgical treatment for resectable central lung cancer. However, bronchial dehiscence is one of the most life-threatening complications, making it important to identify its risk factors to separate patients who require more attention during the postoperative period.
Methods: The data of 285 patients who underwent bronchoplasty from 2006 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We collected demographic characteristics, history of neoadjuvant therapy, preoperative assessment, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications to investigate different variables as risk factors for bronchial dehiscence by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: Bronchial dehiscence was diagnosed in 12 patients (4.2%) with a mean presentation on postoperative day 10 (range: 1-24 days). By multivariate analysis, current smoking (odds ratio [OR]: 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-20.1, p = 0.032), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; OR: 6.5, 95% CI: 1.2-33.8, p = 0.027), bronchoplastic right lower lobectomy (OR: 12.9, 95% CI: 2.4-69.7, p = 0.003), and upper sleeve bilobectomy with segmentectomy S6 by performing an anastomosis between right main bronchus (RMB) and bronchus of basal pyramid (BP) (OR: 30.4, 95% CI: 3.4-268.1, p = 0.002) were confirmed as relevant risk factors for developing bronchial dehiscence.
Conclusion: Current smoking, COPD, bronchoplastic right lower lobe, and upper l with segmentectomy S6 by performing an anastomosis between RMB and bronchus of BP were identified with the occurrence of bronchial dehiscence after sleeve resection.
{"title":"Evaluation of Risk Factors for Early Insufficiency after Bronchial Sleeve Resections.","authors":"Evgeny Levchenko, Viktoriia Shabinskaya, Nikita Levchenko, Alexander Mikhnin, Oleg Mamontov, Stepan Ergnyan","doi":"10.1055/a-2382-8087","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2382-8087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Bronchoplastic resections are now widely used as a surgical treatment for resectable central lung cancer. However, bronchial dehiscence is one of the most life-threatening complications, making it important to identify its risk factors to separate patients who require more attention during the postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The data of 285 patients who underwent bronchoplasty from 2006 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We collected demographic characteristics, history of neoadjuvant therapy, preoperative assessment, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications to investigate different variables as risk factors for bronchial dehiscence by univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Bronchial dehiscence was diagnosed in 12 patients (4.2%) with a mean presentation on postoperative day 10 (range: 1-24 days). By multivariate analysis, current smoking (odds ratio [OR]: 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-20.1, <i>p</i> = 0.032), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; OR: 6.5, 95% CI: 1.2-33.8, <i>p</i> = 0.027), bronchoplastic right lower lobectomy (OR: 12.9, 95% CI: 2.4-69.7, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and upper sleeve bilobectomy with segmentectomy S6 by performing an anastomosis between right main bronchus (RMB) and bronchus of basal pyramid (BP) (OR: 30.4, 95% CI: 3.4-268.1, <i>p</i> = 0.002) were confirmed as relevant risk factors for developing bronchial dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Current smoking, COPD, bronchoplastic right lower lobe, and upper l with segmentectomy S6 by performing an anastomosis between RMB and bronchus of BP were identified with the occurrence of bronchial dehiscence after sleeve resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141907772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}