Barbara M Masser, Kyle S Jensen, Marijke Welvaert, Eamonn Ferguson, Rachel Thorpe, Aaron Akpu Philip
Background: Blood collection agencies are shifting to gender-neutral risk assessment for donor eligibility. Pre-implementation data on donor eligibility and acceptance rates are essential to understand the likely impact of these changes locally.
Study design and methods: A cross-sectional online survey was emailed to current Australian blood donors (donated in the last 12 months). Consistent with the recommendations of the United Kingdom's For the Assessment of Individualised Risk (FAIR) project and the United States of America (USA) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gender-neutral screening criteria, participants were asked about sexual behaviors in the last 3 months (multiple partners, new partners, anal sex) and whether being asked about these would deter them from donating. Demographic characteristics and behavioral responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.
Results: Of 7938 respondents (11.3% response rate), only 0.6% (95% CI 0.4-0.8) would be ineligible under gender-neutral criteria (0.7%, 95% CI 0.2-1.8 of those who donated in the last 3 months). Those potentially ineligible were younger and less likely to identify as heterosexual. While tolerance for screening questions was generally high (≥70.0% indicated questions would not stop them donating), 12.7% (95% CI 12.0-13.4) indicated that one or more of the questions asked of all would stop or be quite likely to stop them attempting to donate. Some variation in tolerance was observed by demographic categories.
Discussion: Implementation of gender-neutral screening criteria in Australia would result in minimal donor loss due to ineligibility. While questions would be generally tolerated, careful implementation considering demographic variations is warranted.
背景:采血机构正在转向对献血者资格进行性别中立的风险评估。关于捐助者资格和接受率的实施前数据对于了解这些变化在当地可能产生的影响至关重要。研究设计和方法:通过电子邮件向当前的澳大利亚献血者(过去12个月内捐献的)发送横断面在线调查。根据英国个体化风险评估(FAIR)项目和美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)性别中立筛查标准的建议,参与者被问及最近3个月内的性行为(多伴侣、新伴侣、肛交),以及被问及这些行为是否会阻止他们捐赠。采用描述性统计和卡方检验分析人口统计学特征和行为反应。结果:在7938名受访者(11.3%的回复率)中,只有0.6% (95% CI 0.4-0.8)不符合性别中立标准(0.7%,95% CI 0.2-1.8)。那些可能不符合条件的人更年轻,不太可能认为自己是异性恋者。虽然对筛查问题的容错度通常很高(≥70.0%表示问题不会阻止他们捐赠),但12.7% (95% CI 12.0-13.4)表示,对所有人提出的一个或多个问题会阻止或很可能阻止他们尝试捐赠。根据人口统计类别,耐受性有一些差异。讨论:在澳大利亚实施性别中立的筛查标准将使因不合格而造成的供体损失最小化。虽然问题一般是可以容忍的,但考虑到人口的变化,有必要仔细执行。
{"title":"Gender-neutral assessment in Australia: Acceptance and eligibility among current donors.","authors":"Barbara M Masser, Kyle S Jensen, Marijke Welvaert, Eamonn Ferguson, Rachel Thorpe, Aaron Akpu Philip","doi":"10.1111/trf.70097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood collection agencies are shifting to gender-neutral risk assessment for donor eligibility. Pre-implementation data on donor eligibility and acceptance rates are essential to understand the likely impact of these changes locally.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was emailed to current Australian blood donors (donated in the last 12 months). Consistent with the recommendations of the United Kingdom's For the Assessment of Individualised Risk (FAIR) project and the United States of America (USA) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gender-neutral screening criteria, participants were asked about sexual behaviors in the last 3 months (multiple partners, new partners, anal sex) and whether being asked about these would deter them from donating. Demographic characteristics and behavioral responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7938 respondents (11.3% response rate), only 0.6% (95% CI 0.4-0.8) would be ineligible under gender-neutral criteria (0.7%, 95% CI 0.2-1.8 of those who donated in the last 3 months). Those potentially ineligible were younger and less likely to identify as heterosexual. While tolerance for screening questions was generally high (≥70.0% indicated questions would not stop them donating), 12.7% (95% CI 12.0-13.4) indicated that one or more of the questions asked of all would stop or be quite likely to stop them attempting to donate. Some variation in tolerance was observed by demographic categories.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation of gender-neutral screening criteria in Australia would result in minimal donor loss due to ineligibility. While questions would be generally tolerated, careful implementation considering demographic variations is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Indira Guleria, Laura S Connelly-Smith, Asawari Bapat, Monica Klein, Hassan Alkhateeb, Eapen K Jacob, Simran Mahanta, Annabelle J Anandappa, Wanxing Cui, Ronit Reich-Slotky, Christina Celluzzi, Thomas R Spitzer
{"title":"Chimerism and a framework for clinical practice: A report from the Cellular Therapies Section Coordinating Committee (CTSCC) of Association for Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB).","authors":"Indira Guleria, Laura S Connelly-Smith, Asawari Bapat, Monica Klein, Hassan Alkhateeb, Eapen K Jacob, Simran Mahanta, Annabelle J Anandappa, Wanxing Cui, Ronit Reich-Slotky, Christina Celluzzi, Thomas R Spitzer","doi":"10.1111/trf.70095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70095","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jacob W Roden-Foreman, Michael E Johnston, Nicole Lunardi, Pamela J Jensen, Tanya Robohm, Michael Cheung, Philip Edmundson, Brian Tibbs
Background: Use of low-titer O+ whole blood (LTOWB) in civilian trauma has increased in recent years. This project evaluated multiple patient-centered and resource-related outcomes related to the initiation of our facility's LTOWB program in November 2020.
Study design and methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients receiving component therapy versus LTOWB within 4 h of arrival to our trauma center in November 2018 to 2022. Females were excluded due to ineligibility. After 1:1 matching, double-robust estimation was used to model outcomes.
Results: A total of 218 patients were included. LTOWB was associated with equivalent or better outcomes for all variables assessed. Overall mortality was similar between groups (hazard ratio = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.65-1.68). Emergency department mortality was lower in patients receiving LTOWB (12.7% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.006). Among survivors, lengths of stay were non-significantly shorter with LTOWB (13 ± 14 days vs. 17 ± 29 days, p = 0.096). Among non-survivors, patients who received LTOWB survived longer before succumbing (1.3 ± 3.1 days vs. 0.2 ± 0.6 days, p = 0.012). Total massive transfusion volumes, including LTOWB, were 40% lower with LTOWB (rate ratio = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.85).
Discussion: This evaluation of our LTOWB program indicates many outcomes are similar with LTOWB and component therapy. However, LTOWB patients survived longer during initial resuscitation and had lower massive transfusion requirements. This represents an opportunity to conserve blood products and provides opportunities for surgical rescue in severely injured patients.
背景:近年来,低滴度O+全血(LTOWB)在平民创伤中的应用有所增加。该项目评估了与2020年11月启动的LTOWB项目相关的以患者为中心和与资源相关的多项结果。研究设计和方法:本回顾性队列研究调查了2018年11月至2022年到达创伤中心后4小时内接受成分治疗与LTOWB的患者。女性因不合格而被排除在外。1:1匹配后,采用双稳健估计对结果进行建模。结果:共纳入218例患者。LTOWB与所有评估变量的相同或更好的结果相关。两组间的总死亡率相似(风险比= 1.05,95% CI = 0.65-1.68)。接受LTOWB治疗的患者急诊科死亡率较低(12.7%比20.9%,p = 0.006)。在幸存者中,LTOWB组的住院时间无显著缩短(13±14天vs. 17±29天,p = 0.096)。在非幸存者中,接受LTOWB治疗的患者存活时间更长(1.3±3.1天vs. 0.2±0.6天,p = 0.012)。包括LTOWB在内的总大量输血量,LTOWB组比LTOWB组低40%(率比= 0.60,95% CI = 0.43-0.85)。讨论:对我们LTOWB项目的评估表明,许多结果与LTOWB和成分治疗相似。然而,LTOWB患者在初始复苏期间存活时间更长,大量输血需求更低。这为保存血液制品提供了机会,并为重伤员的外科抢救提供了机会。
{"title":"Equivalent and resource-saving: Whole blood versus component therapy for trauma resuscitation.","authors":"Jacob W Roden-Foreman, Michael E Johnston, Nicole Lunardi, Pamela J Jensen, Tanya Robohm, Michael Cheung, Philip Edmundson, Brian Tibbs","doi":"10.1111/trf.70100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of low-titer O+ whole blood (LTOWB) in civilian trauma has increased in recent years. This project evaluated multiple patient-centered and resource-related outcomes related to the initiation of our facility's LTOWB program in November 2020.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined patients receiving component therapy versus LTOWB within 4 h of arrival to our trauma center in November 2018 to 2022. Females were excluded due to ineligibility. After 1:1 matching, double-robust estimation was used to model outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 patients were included. LTOWB was associated with equivalent or better outcomes for all variables assessed. Overall mortality was similar between groups (hazard ratio = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.65-1.68). Emergency department mortality was lower in patients receiving LTOWB (12.7% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.006). Among survivors, lengths of stay were non-significantly shorter with LTOWB (13 ± 14 days vs. 17 ± 29 days, p = 0.096). Among non-survivors, patients who received LTOWB survived longer before succumbing (1.3 ± 3.1 days vs. 0.2 ± 0.6 days, p = 0.012). Total massive transfusion volumes, including LTOWB, were 40% lower with LTOWB (rate ratio = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.85).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This evaluation of our LTOWB program indicates many outcomes are similar with LTOWB and component therapy. However, LTOWB patients survived longer during initial resuscitation and had lower massive transfusion requirements. This represents an opportunity to conserve blood products and provides opportunities for surgical rescue in severely injured patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Evan Baines, Jamison Geracci, Eric Kretz, Spencer Knierim, Alexander Bowers, Ricky Ditzel, Christopher Jackson, Noah Taylor, Joshua Lowe, Donald Jenkins
{"title":"Blood as a strategic resource: Lessons from Iwo Jima for civilian and military transfusion in large-scale combat operations.","authors":"Evan Baines, Jamison Geracci, Eric Kretz, Spencer Knierim, Alexander Bowers, Ricky Ditzel, Christopher Jackson, Noah Taylor, Joshua Lowe, Donald Jenkins","doi":"10.1111/trf.70073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70073","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: D-negative blood donors are rare (0.3%) in Thailand. Patients with Asian DEL are D-seronegative but can receive D-positive blood without anti-D alloimmunization. To improve blood management, this study aimed to determine screening methods for detecting RHD variant alleles in serologic D-negative Thai patients.
Study design and methods: Serologic D-negative blood samples were subjected to adsorption/elution for the DEL phenotype. The Hybrid Rhesus box, RHD exon 4, and RHD1227A were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing for RHD1227A. For inconclusive results, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted. Genetic variants on RHD and RHCE genes were confirmed using deletion-spanning PCR and Sanger sequencing.
Results: Among 80 patients, 57 (71.3%) cases of total RHD gene deletion, 20 (25.0%) of Asian DEL hemizygosity, two (2.5%) of novel genetic variants, and one (1.2%) with an inconclusive result were identified. Two patients had a novel RHD exon 3 frameshift variant, c.441delG p.V147fs, producing a truncated protein. Serology of all patients with novel variants showed D-negative. The adsorption/elution testing showed 34.8% false positive and 9.4% false negative rates for Asian DEL.
Discussion: Our study suggests that PCR and Sanger sequencing for Asian DEL is helpful for serologic D-negative Thai patients, while adsorption/elution is unreliable. WGS, if available, is useful to identify rare and new variants, whereas its cost is not worth for routine testing in the Asian population.
{"title":"Analysis of RHD variant alleles in serologically D-negative Thai patients: Prevalence and novel discoveries.","authors":"Thunnakhon Sinwatcharaphirom, Pattarin Tangtanatakul, Tuangrat Kumar, Patrawadee Pitakpolrat, Suwanna Mekprasan, Manon Boonbangyang, Chureerat Phokaew, Phandee Watanaboonyongchareon, Ponlapat Rojnuckarin","doi":"10.1111/trf.70090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>D-negative blood donors are rare (0.3%) in Thailand. Patients with Asian DEL are D-seronegative but can receive D-positive blood without anti-D alloimmunization. To improve blood management, this study aimed to determine screening methods for detecting RHD variant alleles in serologic D-negative Thai patients.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Serologic D-negative blood samples were subjected to adsorption/elution for the DEL phenotype. The Hybrid Rhesus box, RHD exon 4, and RHD1227A were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing for RHD1227A. For inconclusive results, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted. Genetic variants on RHD and RHCE genes were confirmed using deletion-spanning PCR and Sanger sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 80 patients, 57 (71.3%) cases of total RHD gene deletion, 20 (25.0%) of Asian DEL hemizygosity, two (2.5%) of novel genetic variants, and one (1.2%) with an inconclusive result were identified. Two patients had a novel RHD exon 3 frameshift variant, c.441delG p.V147fs, producing a truncated protein. Serology of all patients with novel variants showed D-negative. The adsorption/elution testing showed 34.8% false positive and 9.4% false negative rates for Asian DEL.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study suggests that PCR and Sanger sequencing for Asian DEL is helpful for serologic D-negative Thai patients, while adsorption/elution is unreliable. WGS, if available, is useful to identify rare and new variants, whereas its cost is not worth for routine testing in the Asian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gülsüm Kadıoğlu Şimşek, Betül Siyah Bilgin, Orhun Kerem Kalaycı, Metehan Yaşar Tekin, Zeliha Güzelküçük, H Gözde Kanmaz Kutman
Background: This retrospective study investigated blood product transfusions and neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm infants with birth weights <1500 g and gestational ages <32 weeks.
Study design and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 291 preterm infants admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit between January 2020 and December 2022. Data were collected on transfusion exposure, including packed red blood cells (RBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets. Clinical outcomes included mortality and major neonatal morbidities: bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Univariate analyses were performed, followed by multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding factors including birth weight and gestational age.
Results: 80% of infants received RBC transfusion, 37.8% received FFP, and 16.1% received platelets. Transfused infants had lower gestational ages and birth weights. RBC, FFP, and platelet transfusions were associated with higher rates of BPD, IVH, NEC, and mortality in univariate analyses. In multivariable analysis, birth weight alone predicted mortality, suggesting extreme prematurity and illness severity were primary drivers. RBC transfusion independently predicted NEC and BPD, while FFP and platelet transfusions were linked to BPD. Total transfusions correlated with higher BPD, NEC, and mortality rates. Early transfusions were linked to impaired survival.
Discussion: These findings suggest transfusions may not be independently associated with mortality, but may instead reflect underlying illness severity. However, they remain associated with serious morbidities in extremely preterm infants. The results emphasize the importance of judicious transfusion practices, evidence-based thresholds, and research to clarify potential causal relationships.
{"title":"Transfusion of blood products and neonatal outcomes in preterm infants: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Gülsüm Kadıoğlu Şimşek, Betül Siyah Bilgin, Orhun Kerem Kalaycı, Metehan Yaşar Tekin, Zeliha Güzelküçük, H Gözde Kanmaz Kutman","doi":"10.1111/trf.70064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This retrospective study investigated blood product transfusions and neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm infants with birth weights <1500 g and gestational ages <32 weeks.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 291 preterm infants admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit between January 2020 and December 2022. Data were collected on transfusion exposure, including packed red blood cells (RBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets. Clinical outcomes included mortality and major neonatal morbidities: bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Univariate analyses were performed, followed by multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding factors including birth weight and gestational age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80% of infants received RBC transfusion, 37.8% received FFP, and 16.1% received platelets. Transfused infants had lower gestational ages and birth weights. RBC, FFP, and platelet transfusions were associated with higher rates of BPD, IVH, NEC, and mortality in univariate analyses. In multivariable analysis, birth weight alone predicted mortality, suggesting extreme prematurity and illness severity were primary drivers. RBC transfusion independently predicted NEC and BPD, while FFP and platelet transfusions were linked to BPD. Total transfusions correlated with higher BPD, NEC, and mortality rates. Early transfusions were linked to impaired survival.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest transfusions may not be independently associated with mortality, but may instead reflect underlying illness severity. However, they remain associated with serious morbidities in extremely preterm infants. The results emphasize the importance of judicious transfusion practices, evidence-based thresholds, and research to clarify potential causal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pawan Acharya, Timothy Hurson, Chandler Annesi, Christine Carico, Daniel Lammers, N Clay Mann, Matthew Levy, Molly P Jarman, Jeffrey D Kerby, Jan O Jansen, John B Holcomb, Zain G Hashmi
Background: Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of preventable traumatic deaths, with many fatalities occurring before hospital arrival. Although geographic differences in prehospital time (PHT) are recognized, contemporary national estimates and their implications for resuscitation readiness are not well defined. This study aimed to characterize geographic variation in PHT among trauma patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock to inform strategies for earlier intervention.
Study design and methods: We analyzed 2020-2023 data from the National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Information System (NEMSIS) and included trauma patients aged ≥16 years at risk of hemorrhagic shock, defined as shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) ≥1 at the scene. PHT was defined as the interval from dispatch to hospital arrival and compared across urbanicity (urban, suburban, rural, wilderness) and transport mode (ground or air).
Results: Among 939,335 eligible encounters, the median prehospital time (PHT) differed significantly across urbanicity categories, increasing progressively from urban to wilderness regions (urban 39 min [IQR 30-51], suburban 45 [32-63], rural 50 [34-71], wilderness 56 [37-78]; p < .001). All three components of PHT-system response, scene, and transport time-were longer in rural and wilderness. Total PHTs remained stable, with only minor year-to-year variation. Air PHT was consistently longer than ground PHT (p < .001) and showed no temporal improvement across 2020-2023.
Discussion: National EMS data show persistently prolonged prehospital times for trauma patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock, especially in rural and wilderness areas. Bringing transfusion capability closer to patients through prehospital blood programs may be critical to reducing time-dependent mortality.
{"title":"Unequal access to timely care: Geographic variation in prehospital time among injured patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock.","authors":"Pawan Acharya, Timothy Hurson, Chandler Annesi, Christine Carico, Daniel Lammers, N Clay Mann, Matthew Levy, Molly P Jarman, Jeffrey D Kerby, Jan O Jansen, John B Holcomb, Zain G Hashmi","doi":"10.1111/trf.70086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of preventable traumatic deaths, with many fatalities occurring before hospital arrival. Although geographic differences in prehospital time (PHT) are recognized, contemporary national estimates and their implications for resuscitation readiness are not well defined. This study aimed to characterize geographic variation in PHT among trauma patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock to inform strategies for earlier intervention.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We analyzed 2020-2023 data from the National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Information System (NEMSIS) and included trauma patients aged ≥16 years at risk of hemorrhagic shock, defined as shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) ≥1 at the scene. PHT was defined as the interval from dispatch to hospital arrival and compared across urbanicity (urban, suburban, rural, wilderness) and transport mode (ground or air).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 939,335 eligible encounters, the median prehospital time (PHT) differed significantly across urbanicity categories, increasing progressively from urban to wilderness regions (urban 39 min [IQR 30-51], suburban 45 [32-63], rural 50 [34-71], wilderness 56 [37-78]; p < .001). All three components of PHT-system response, scene, and transport time-were longer in rural and wilderness. Total PHTs remained stable, with only minor year-to-year variation. Air PHT was consistently longer than ground PHT (p < .001) and showed no temporal improvement across 2020-2023.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>National EMS data show persistently prolonged prehospital times for trauma patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock, especially in rural and wilderness areas. Bringing transfusion capability closer to patients through prehospital blood programs may be critical to reducing time-dependent mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146030934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Constantine E Kanakis, Laura O'Shaughnessy, Skyler Zur, Johnathon Pugh, Patricia Bochey, Ricardo Sumugod, Jacob Nieb, Louanne Carabini, Paul F Lindholm, Glenn Ramsey
{"title":"A BASIC study: A review of blood product shortage preparedness evaluation and recommendations for Chicagoland transfusion services.","authors":"Constantine E Kanakis, Laura O'Shaughnessy, Skyler Zur, Johnathon Pugh, Patricia Bochey, Ricardo Sumugod, Jacob Nieb, Louanne Carabini, Paul F Lindholm, Glenn Ramsey","doi":"10.1111/trf.70093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70093","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A novel missense variant c.674T>C (p.Leu225Pro) underlies the A<sub>el</sub> phenotype in a Chinese blood donor.","authors":"Jue Hou, Xuemei Zhang, Han Yang, Xue Chen","doi":"10.1111/trf.70075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70075","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher M Wend, Matthew J Levy, Holly O'Byrne, Donald Jenkins, Jon R Krohmer, John B Holcomb
{"title":"Rethinking the hemorrhagic shock chain of survival: The role, importance, and impact of prehospital blood administration.","authors":"Christopher M Wend, Matthew J Levy, Holly O'Byrne, Donald Jenkins, Jon R Krohmer, John B Holcomb","doi":"10.1111/trf.70082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70082","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}