Transfusion最新文献

Background: Unnecessary group and screens (G&S) can lead to unnecessary antibody investigations, use of technologist time, and laboratory resources.

Local problem: A baseline audit at our institution identified that 25% of G&S from the cancer center were unnecessary. We aimed to reduce the ratio of monthly G&S to CBC samples processed from the cancer center by 10% (from 0.034 to 0.031) by January 2024.

Methods: This represents an interrupted time series design from November 2022 to January 2024. Using Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles, we aimed to increase the use of an existing reflex testing system, termed "do not test." When this option is selected, the blood bank will only process the G&S sample if specific CBC criteria are met (e.g., hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL). Educational sessions increased awareness of this feature and sought feedback from end-users on its usability. With feedback, the design was updated to include a modifiable hemoglobin threshold for G&S testing, automatic re-selection of the "do not test" feature for future G&S orders, and aesthetic changes to make the feature more visible.

Results: The percentage of samples with "do not test" selected increased from 7.2% to 63.0% (p < .0001) and the ratio of G&S to CBC specimens improved from 0.034 to 0.028, exceeding the target of 0.031. We noted an improvement in the appropriateness of G&S orders from 75% at baseline (n = 20) to 97.5% (n = 80) post intervention (p = .003).

Conclusions: We describe an effective strategy to improve G&S utilization at our institution's cancer center using a reflex testing system.

Background: Despite prophylactic platelet transfusions, hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia is associated with bleeding; historical risk factors include hematocrit (HCT) $\le$ 25%, activated partial thromboplastin time $\ge$ 30 s, international normalized ratio $\ge$ 1.2, and platelets $\le$ 5000/μL.

Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of bleeding outcomes and risk factors in participants with hematologic malignancy and hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia enrolled in the American Trial to Evaluate Tranexamic Acid Therapy in Thrombocytopenia (A-TREAT) and randomized to receive either tranexamic acid (TXA) or placebo.

Results: World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2+ bleeding occurred in 46% of 330 participants, with no difference between the TXA (44%) and placebo (47%) groups (p = 0.66). Overall, the most common sites of bleeding were oronasal (18%), skin (17%), gastrointestinal (11%), and genitourinary (11%). Among participants of childbearing potential, 28% experienced vaginal bleeding. Platelets ≤5000/μL and HCT < 21% (after adjusting for severe thrombocytopenia) were independently associated with increased bleeding risk (HR 3.78, 95% CI 2.16-6.61; HR 2.67, 95% CI 1.35-5.27, respectively). Allogeneic stem cell transplant was associated with nonsignificant increased risk of bleeding versus chemotherapy alone (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.94-1.91).

Discussion: The overall rate of WHO grade 2+ bleeding was similar to previous reports, albeit with lower rates of gastrointestinal bleeding. Vaginal bleeding was common in participants of childbearing potential. Platelets ≤5000/μL remained a risk factor for bleeding. Regardless of platelet count, bleeding risk increased with HCT < 21%, suggesting a red blood cell transfusion threshold above 21% should be considered to mitigate bleeding. More investigation is needed on strategies to reduce bleeding in this population.

Background: Group AB plasma does not contain anti-A or anti-B antibodies and is therefore considered universal but is in limited supply (4% of the population). There is currently no licensed universal plasma available, and therefore current clinical guidelines for transfusion require the donor and recipient to be blood group compatible. We sought to understand the benefits of universal plasma to hospitals in England, to inform R&D priorities going forward.

Study design and methods: To understand the benefits of universal plasma (cryoprecipitate included), we distributed two surveys to hospitals (267 in total) in England.

Results: Safety was the perceived top benefit of universal plasma (95%), with cost identified as the main barrier to adoption (82%), although the majority of respondents were willing to pay more for universal components. Ninety-five respondents felt they would replace all or part of their stock holding with universal plasma, with 91% anticipating that their overall stock holding of plasma would reduce as well as there will be a reduction in their plasma wastage (by up to 25%). Hospitals (56%) thought that the availability of universal plasma would support more rapid provision of plasma for transfusion, particularly in emergency situations, with the emergency/trauma department deemed to be the area that would see the greatest benefit from these universal blood components.

Discussion: The response to both the potential clinical and operational benefits of a universal plasma and cryoprecipitate was positive.

Background: Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of mortality, accounting for 25% of all deaths among individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). There is a lack of evidence-based laboratory and clinical risk stratification guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ACS.

Study design and methods: To better understand physician practices for the management of ACS in the United States, we created an ACS Working Group including hematology and transfusion medicine physicians from four different SCD treatment centers in the United States. The working group created a physician survey that included physician demographics and ACS diagnostic criteria that they had to rate. The survey also included three case scenarios to assess physician attitudes about the management of ACS. Management options included supportive and preventive strategies in addition to transfusion therapy options.

Results: Out of 455 physicians who received the survey, 195 responded (response rate = 43%). The respondents were primarily hematology/oncology physicians. The responses showed wide variability among physicians in how diagnostic criteria for ACS are used and how physicians risk-stratify ACS patients in their practice. The responses also reflected variability in the use of transfusions for ACS.

Discussion: Based on our results, we conclude that ACS is diagnosed and managed inconsistently among expert physicians, especially in their transfusion practices due to a lack of consensus on risk stratification criteria. Our data suggest an urgent need for well-designed prospective studies to provide evidence-based guidelines and minimize management variability among physicians who care for individuals with SCD and ACS.

Background: Massive transfusion with citrated blood products causes hypocalcemia, which is associated with mortality. Recognition of this problem has led to increased calcium administration; however, the optimal dosing is still unknown.

Study design and methods: This retrospective, single-center study included level 1 trauma patients in 2019 and 2020 who underwent an operation within 12 h of arrival and received a transfusion. Preoperative and intraoperative administrations were totaled to calculate the ratio of administered calcium to the number of blood transfusions for each patient. The citrate content of each blood component was estimated to calculate a second ratio, the ratio of administered calcium to administered citrate. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were performed on both ratios to determine the optimal cutoff values for predicting severe hypocalcemia (ionized calcium <0.9 mmol/L) and hypercalcemia (>1.35 mmol/L) at the end of the intraoperative period.

Results: A total of 506 trauma activations were included, receiving a mean of 17.4 citrated blood products and 16.3 mmol of calcium (equivalent to 2400 mg of calcium chloride). No ratio was statistically significant in differentiating severely hypocalcemic patients from the rest. A calcium to blood ratio of 0.903 mmol of administered calcium per citrated blood product differentiated hypercalcemic patients from the rest.

Discussion: Quantifying received calcium and citrated blood products was insufficient to predict severe hypocalcemia, suggesting other contributions to hypocalcemia. We demonstrated an upper-limit ratio for calcium administration in traumatic hemorrhage; however, further studies are required to determine what calcium dosing regimen results in the best outcomes.

Background: Pediatric patients from minoritized racial and ethnic groups receive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions more frequently while undergoing major surgical procedures. Our objective was to identify the contribution of preoperative anemia to racial and ethnic differences in RBC transfusion rates in adolescent spine surgery.

Study design and methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database, 2016 to 2021 for patients in the United States and Canada.

Results: Adolescents identifying as non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other race/ethnicity presented with higher rates of preoperative anemia than non-Hispanic White adolescents (16.3%, 10.6%, and 9.9%, vs. 7.8%, respectively; p < .0001) and were transfused at higher rates (14.4%, 11.9%, 16.5%, vs. 10.0%, respectively; p < .0001). Minoritized groups demonstrated higher adjusted odds of RBC transfusion compared with non-Hispanic Whites (non-Hispanic Black: aOR 1.45 95% CI 1.26-1.65, Hispanic: aOR 1.17 95% CI 0.96-1.41, other race/ethnicity: aOR 1.63 95% CI 1.26-2.09). Of the total effect of minoritized race and/or ethnicity on RBC transfusion, 13.9% was attributed to the indirect effect through preoperative anemia.

Discussion: In this cohort study, patients from minoritized racial and ethnic groups received RBC transfusions at a higher rate than non-Hispanic White patients, and the difference was partially mediated by preoperative anemia. Future efforts to minimize transfusions and improve health equity should target this modifiable risk factor alongside other sources of disparity and discrimination.

Background: COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) remains a treatment option for immunocompromised patients; however, the current FDA qualification threshold of ≥200 BAU/mL of spike antibody appears to be relatively low. We evaluated the levels of binding (bAb) and neutralizing antibodies (nAb) on serial samples from repeat blood donors who were vaccinated and/or infected to inform criteria for qualifying CCP from routinely collected plasma components.

Methods: Donors were categorized into four groups: (1) infected, then vaccinated, (2) vaccinated then infected during the delta, or (3) omicron waves, (4) vaccinated without infection. IgG Spike and total Nuclecapsid bAb were measured, along with S variants and nAb titers using reporter viral particle neutralization.

Results: Mean S IgG bAb peaks after infection alone were lower than after primary and booster vaccinations, and higher after delta and omicron infection in previously vaccinated donors. Half-lives for S IgG ranged from 34 to 66 days after first infection/vaccination events and up to 108 days after second events. The levels of S IgG bAb and nAb were similar across different variants, except for omicron, which were lower. Better correlations of nAb with bAb were observed at higher levels (hybrid immunity) than at the current FDA CCP qualifying threshold.

Discussion: Routine plasma donations from donors with hybrid immunity had high S bAb and potent neutralizing activity for 3-6 months after infection. In donations with high (>4000 BAU/mL) S IgG, >95% had high nAb titers (>500) against ancestral and variant S, regardless of COVID-19 symptoms. These findings provide the basis for test-based criteria for qualifying CCP from routine blood donations.

Background: China's significant population affected by HIV poses a substantial threat to blood transfusion safety. Despite advancements in blood testing techniques, a residual risk of HIV transmission persists. Accurately assessing HIV epidemic and the residual risk is vital for monitoring blood supply safety and evaluating the effectiveness of new screening tests.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of HIV detection results among voluntary blood donors from 2003 to 2022. The study included data on HIV-confirmed positive donors, HIV prevalence, infection risk factors, and an incidence-window period mathematical model to estimate the residual risk of HIV.

Results: Between 2003 and 2022, HIV prevalence among blood donors in Guangzhou showed a peak-shaped trend, initially increasing before declining. The overall HIV prevalence was 18.9 infections per 100,000 donations. Male donors had a significantly higher prevalence compared with female donors. Donors aged 26-35 years had the highest prevalence. Ethnic minority donors had a higher prevalence compared with Han donors. Repeat donors had a lower prevalence compared with first-time donors. Donors from other provinces had a higher prevalence compared with local donors. During the period of 2003 to 2022, the residual risk of HIV in Guangzhou steadily decreased, reaching a notable 1 in 526,316 donations in the past two years.

Conclusion: The HIV epidemic among blood donors in Guangzhou remains severe, but the residual risk of HIV is decreasing. Novel detection methods have proven advantageous in reducing this residual risk. Implementing additional effective measures is imperative to ensure blood safety and curb the spread of HIV.

Background: Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) screening has been implemented in many blood establishments to help prevent transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV), including from donors with occult HBV infection (OBI). We review HBV screening algorithms across blood establishments globally and their potential effectiveness in reducing transmission risk.

Materials and methods: A questionnaire on HBV screening and follow-up strategies was distributed to members of the International Society of Blood Transfusion working party on transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases. Screening data from 2022 were assimilated and analyzed.

Results: A total of 30 unique responses were received from 25 countries. Sixteen respondents screened all donations for anti-HBc, with 14 also screening all donations for HBV DNA. Anti-HBc prevalence was 0.42% in all blood donors and 1.19% in new donors in low-endemic countries; however, only 44% of respondents performed additional anti-HBc testing to exclude false reactivity. 0.68% of anti-HBc positive, HBsAg-negative donors had detectable HBV DNA. Ten respondents did universal HBV DNA screening without anti-HBc, whereas four respondents did not screen for either. Deferral strategies for anti-HBc positive donors were highly variable. One transfusion-transmission from an anti-HBc negative donor was reported.

Discussion: Anti-HBc screening identifies donors with OBI but also results in the unnecessary deferral of a significant number of donors with resolved HBV infection and donors with false-reactive anti-HBc results. Whilst confirmation of anti-HBc results could be improved to reduce donor deferral, transmission risks associated with anti-HBc negative OBI donors must be considered. In high-endemic areas, highly sensitive HBV DNA testing is required to identify infectious donors.