Translational gastroenterology and hepatology最新文献

Background: Patients with cirrhosis have a high risk for morbidity and mortality in relation to abdominal surgery. Despite improvements in surgical techniques and intensive care, major abdominal surgery still remains a challenge. Major factors determining short- and long-term survival and perioperative complications in this patient population include severity of liver dysfunction, degree of portal hypertension (PHTN), and the presence of related complications such as ascites. Elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement prior to surgery has been reported to improve perioperative outcomes, but available data is limited to case reports and small case series. We aimed to determine the impact of elective TIPS placement on perioperative outcomes after abdominal-pelvic surgeries in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent elective TIPS and compared these patients with a cohort of cirrhotic patients who underwent any abdominal surgeries without TIPS placement. The primary outcomes were mortality at 30 days and 1 year following surgery. Other post-operative outcomes compared between the two groups, included: blood loss, worsening ascites, wound leak, infections, encephalopathy, liver decompensation, and length of hospitalization.

Results: Among 38 patients with cirrhosis who underwent abdominal surgery, 20 patients underwent pre-operative elective TIPS placement. Demographic characteristics of the two groups were comparable including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). The median age was 62 years with a male predominance (62.5%). Both groups had similar etiologies of cirrhosis with hepatitis C virus (HCV) (34.2%) being most common. The most frequent indications for surgery were strangulated hernia (50%) in the TIPS group and acute cholecystitis (55.6%) in the non-TIPS group. Mean pre-TIPS hepato-venous portal gradient (HVPG) was 16.5 mmHg and mean post-TIPS HVPG was 7.0 mmHg. Mortality at 1 month was not statistically different between the groups (20% vs. 5.6%, respectively, P=0.19). The 1-year mortality was also not statistically different between the two groups (20% vs. 11.1%, P=0.36).

Conclusions: We found no statistically significant difference in mortality or rate of post-operative complications between patients who received pre-operative TIPS and those who did not in our age-matched cohort.

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the world's most prevalent chronic liver disease. In advanced stages, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and scoring panels Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) are useful noninvasive alternatives to liver biopsy for fibrosis staging. Our study aimed to determine how well MRE corresponds with both FIB-4 and NFS at different stages of fibrosis.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients age ≥18 with NAFLD as their only known liver disease who underwent MRE within six months of a lab draw. MRE stratified patients into fibrosis stages using kPa values. FIB-4 categorized patients as Advanced Fibrosis Excluded, Further Investigation Needed or Advanced Fibrosis Likely. NFS categorized them as F0-2, Indeterminate or F3-4. MRE fibrosis staging was compared to FIB-4 and NFS for both ruling out advanced fibrosis and identifying advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis.

Results: Overall, 193 patients met inclusion criteria. Our statistical analysis included calculating positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs), which are the proportions of positive and negative fibrosis screening results that correspond to positive and negative MRE results respectively. NPV for FIB-4 (0.84) and NFS (0.89) in the 'rule out advanced fibrosis' category signify that 84% and 89% of respective biomarker scores correspond to MRE in early stage disease. The PPV for FIB-4 and NFS in the 'identify advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis' category signify 63% and 72% of respective biomarker scores correspond to MRE in late stage disease.

Conclusions: FIB-4 and NFS scores indicating little to no fibrosis correspond extremely well with MRE, while scores suggesting advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis correspond less convincingly. MRE shows promise as an effective alternative to liver biopsy, however our study suggests FIB-4 and NFS alone may be sufficient for fibrosis staging, particularly in early stage NAFLD.

Major advancements in surgery for patients suffering proctocolitis from ulcerative colitis (UC) or selected patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have emerged in a relatively short time. Historically, patients underwent a proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, however, a restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) was introduced in the late 1970s in the United Kingdom and gave patients the opportunity to avoid a permanent stoma. Initially designed as a hand-sewn "S" shaped pouch, with the invention of the linear stapler, a "J" shaped pouch was described in Japan, and subsequent advances in the United States largely contributed to the pelvic pouch's evolution to the standard of care in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The procedure was then divided into different stages depending on the medical condition of the patient and minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic & robotic surgery) have continued to advance the success of the operation. Unfortunately, pouch complications occur, and seem to be occurring at an increasing frequency with the adoption of minimally invasive surgery. The field of reoperative pouch surgery has emerged to offer patients the opportunity to restore their quality of life (QOL) without the need for a permanent ostomy. Many patients with signs of pouch failure such as pouchitis, fistulae, pain and obstruction are diagnosed with Crohn's of the pouch, but many have mechanical complications that can be corrected with surgery, rather than offering pouch excision with a permanent ostomy (continent or traditional). Patients with Crohn's may be offered an IPAA but they will not have success if they, like patients with UC, have mechanical complications leading to their pouch failure. Patients who undergo reoperative pouch surgery do well with an acceptable QOL.

Background and objective: Colonoscopy is an ever-growing procedure, being the primary diagnostic and therapeutic modality to manage lower gastrointestinal pathologies. It has a decades-old history with significant successive endoscopic innovations that eventually led to the development of the current colonoscope, as we know it today.

Methods: We reviewed multiple databases in non-systemic fashion using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library to shed light on historic timeline of advancements and groundbreaking landmark achievements currently underway.

Key content and findings: Initially starting off as a rudimentary rigid, device that utilized candles as a light source, the primitive colonoscope was adapted to a semi-rigid framework to allow better maneuverability. Improved lenses allowed better viewing quality and the development of video capabilities with the capability of performing both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions transformed the colonoscope completely into a modern interventional device. Its utility started gaining attention in the late 90s when multiple guidelines were published, supporting its impact on survival for colorectal screening. Over the years, the therapeutic component of colonoscopy has evolved further allowing it to be used as a treatment modality for several lower gastrointestinal pathologies including control of lower gastrointestinal bleeds, management of large bowel perforation, foreign body removal and dilatation of colonic stenosis. With improving technological advances, success rates of colonoscopic interventions continue to rise and new therapeutic modalities underway further enhancing their role. Multiple developments are underway including use of artificial intelligence (AI) with as endocuff vision, amplify EYE and G-EYE among others that hold great promise for the future of colonoscopy.

Conclusions: With our review, we hope to further the understanding clinicians about the colonoscope and help contribute towards its further developments.

Background: Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which can result in hepatic inflammation and injury that varies from mild to severe and potentially acute fulminant liver injury, may be associated with poor outcomes. Our aims were to: (I) assess baseline clinical and demographic characteristics in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who did and did not have abnormalities in liver chemistries [alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and total bilirubin (Tbili)] and (II) evaluate associations between abnormalities in liver chemistries and the primary outcomes of in-hospital death, intubation, and hospital length of stay (LOS).

Methods: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study of 14,138 patients, we analyzed associations between abnormalities in liver chemistries (ALT, AST, ALP, and Tbili) and mortality, intubation, and prolonged hospital LOS in patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. We used Pearson's chi-squared tests to detect significant differences in categorical variables for patients with and without abnormal liver chemistries. Welch's two-sample t-tests were used to make comparisons of liver chemistry (ALT, AST, ALP, Tbili) and serum albumin results. All other continuous variables were analyzed using independent samples t-tests. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Propensity score matching demonstrated that abnormalities in liver chemistries at admission are significantly associated with increased risk for mortality (RR 1.70) and intubation (RR 1.44) in patients with COVID-19. Elevated AST is the liver chemistry abnormality associated with the highest risk for mortality (RR 2.27), intubation (RR 2.12), and prolonged hospitalization (RR 1.19). Male gender, pre-existing liver disease, and decreased serum albumin are also significantly associated with severe outcomes and death in COVID-19.

Conclusions: Routine liver chemistry testing should be implemented and used for risk stratification at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis.

Background: Immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) often has a good response to initial steroid therapy, but a high relapse rate during follow-up. Knowledge about the predictors and treatment strategy of relapsing IgG4-SC is of great significance.

Case description: In this paper, we reported that a 57-year-old male was diagnosed with IgG4-SC accompanied by type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) at the first onset of his diseases and had a good response to steroid therapy. However, during low-dose steroids maintenance therapy, IgG4-SC relapsed with clinical presentations related to severe bile duct stricture, but improved rapidly after re-administration of full-dose steroids, accompanied by resolution of jaundice, improvement of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stricture, and gradual recovery of liver function. At the last follow-up in December 2021, he was still stable with methylprednisolone tablets at 4 mg/day.

Conclusions: IgG4-SC is likely to relapse in patients who have high serum IgG4 level at initial onset and receive low-dose steroids maintenance treatment. The predictors of disease relapse also include steroids interruption, more severe bile duct stricture, long duration from diagnosis to treatment, history of allergy, and high serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) levels. Re-administration or up-dose of steroids, immunosuppressors, and rituximab are effective for treating relapsing disease.

Crohn's disease (CD) in humans and Johne's disease (JD) in ruminants share numerous clinical and pathologic similarities. As Mycobacteria avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) is known to fulfill Koch's postulates as the cause of JD, there has been considerable debate over the past century about whether MAP also plays a role in CD. With recent advances in MAP identification techniques, we can now demonstrate a higher presence of MAP in CD patients compared to the general population. However, it remains unclear if MAP is playing a bystander role or is directly pathogenic in these patients. Studies have shown that there may be an immune response targeting MAP in these patients, which may underlie a pathologic role in CD. Clinical studies have yielded conflicting results as to whether anti-MAP therapy improves clinical outcomes in CD, leading to the lack of its inclusion within evidence-based clinical guidelines. Additionally, many of these studies have been small case series, with only a few randomized controlled trials published to date. In this article, we will discuss the historical context of MAP in CD, review clinical and laboratory data surrounding detection of MAP and possible pathogenesis in human disease, and suggest future directions which may finally provide some clarity to this debate.

Background: Small intestinal Dieulafoy's lesion (DL) is a rare cause of life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding. Based on previous case reports, the diagnostic approaches for DL located in jejunum and ileum are different. In addition, there is no available consensus regarding the treatment of DL, and previous case reports suggest that surgery is the preferable choice for small intestinal DL compared to endoscopic treatment. Notably, our case report indicates that double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) should be an effective diagnostic and therapeutic approach for small intestinal DL.

Case description: A 66-year-old female was transferred to the Department of Gastroenterology due to hematochezia and abdominal distension and pain for more than 10 days. She had a history of diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, mitral insufficiency, and acute cerebral infarction. Conventional diagnostic approaches, including gastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, and even angiogram, did not show any definite source of bleeding, and then a capsule endoscopy was performed and suggested that the bleeding may be located in ileum. Finally, she was successfully treated by hemostatic clips under DBE via anal route. And there is no recurrence after endoscopic treatment was observed in our case during a 4-month follow-up.

Conclusions: Although small intestinal DL is rare and difficult to be detected by conventional approaches, DL still needs to be considered as a differential diagnosis for gastrointestinal bleeding. In addition, DBE should be considered as a preferred choice for the diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal DL due to lower invasiveness and cost as compared to surgery.

Background and objective: This narrative review discusses Barrett's esophagus management in the context of perceived deficiencies or controversies. Barrett's adenocarcinoma incidence has not clearly been impacted by Barrett's screening and surveillance.

Methods: The following report was derived from articles using PubMed and Google searches. The search was concentrated on Barrett's esophagus screening and management guidelines.

Key content and findings: Comprehensive literature searches that highlight potential deficiencies or controversies regarding the current approach to Barrett's esophagus were employed. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence is rapidly increasing and this malignancy usually presents in an advanced and unresectable state. This is despite the significant expenditure of resources and time in endoscopic screening for and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. Thus, more widespread screening for Barrett's esophagus may be considered. In addition, there are apparent inefficiencies and precision lack in the performance of endoscopic surveillance. This relates mainly to the lack of endoscopic cues for dysplasia. On the other hand, relatively low-risk subjects have frequent screening or surveillance procedures increasing cost. Lastly, endoscopic ablation for Barrett's with dysplasia has moderately good efficacy, especially for eradication of dysplasia, but mandates intensive post-therapy endoscopic surveillance. There is some concern for subsurface development of advanced Barrett's lesions. Fortunately, there is intense research in improving Barrett's esophagus diagnosis and treatment. Our narrative review will delineate deficiencies and potential measures to remedy them.

Conclusions: In conclusion, screening for Barrett's esophagus and surveillance in Barrett's subjects have minimal established benefits, but proposed changes in screening practices and innovations in Barrett's esophagus endoscopic surveillance and dysplasia therapy have great promise.