Transplantation and Cellular Therapy最新文献

Cellular and Gene Therapy product (CGT product) manufacturers are required by regulations to qualify sites performing cell collection and processing as part of their manufacturing processes. The use of audits to qualify a site is part of the traditional supplier quality models for drug products. Due to the rapid growth of the CGT industry in recent years, healthcare institutions and manufacturers are finding it difficult to manage the increasing workload and resources needed to support audits when they are applied to the provision of Cellular Starting Material (CSM) collection from patients/subjects for the purpose of manufacturing. To alleviate this audit burden, several manufacturers have applied risk-based approaches to determine the needs and scope of audits. The authors of this commentary recommend that all manufacturers utilize a risk-based assessment program when appropriate and explain the use of tools created to facilitate a risk-based approach to streamline and reduce duplicative audits. This approach and tools, created by The NextGen Industry Working Group (IWG) site certification workstream with representation from pharmaceutical and biotech companies, health care institutions, accrediting organizations, and other stakeholders, is aligned with proposals from other multistakeholder groups, including the ASTCT 80/20 Task Force. The tools aim to streamline the site qualification processes performed by each manufacturer, offering a standardized approach to audits or gap analysis assessments. Offering an abbreviated audit model for sites that have already attained accreditation through agencies such as the AABB (Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies) and FACT (Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy), helping the manufacturer to focus on product-specific requirements rather than re-evaluating systems that have already been audited in great detail by other parties.

The Third Annual Workshop of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) and National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) ACCESS Initiative occurred on July 23 and 24, 2024. Content from the workshop is provided to inform the hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapy (CT) ecosystem about progress and direction of the collaborative. Highlights from the meeting are reviewed, including the inaugural Corporate Roundtable and Advocacy Day, new partnerships with non-profit organizations, and updates on projects from the Awareness, Poverty and Race and Ethnicity Inequity Committees. In addition, the Junior Faculty and Trainee Immersion Program-sponsored efforts in workforce diversity and physician advocacy are presented. Lastly, continued education was provided on patient and caregiver participation as well as community engagement. As it enters its third year, the ASTCT-NMDP ACCESS Initiative will transition from foundation building as a grass roots collaborative to intentional impact in reducing barriers and improving outcome disparities for all patients in need of HCT/CT. Enthusiasm for and participation in the ACCESS Initiative remain high. Both are needed to sustain progress in achieving its goal in enabling all patients in need to receive HCT/CT.

In vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) using alemtuzumab decreases the risk of Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD) in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). However, this approach increases the risk of infections post-allo-HSCT, including Cytomegalovirus (CMV). Letermovir is approved for the use in CMV prophylaxis post-allo-HSCT. Few studies have investigated the efficacy of letermovir in patients receiving alemtuzumab. This is a single-center retrospective study describing our institutional experience using letermovir in recipients of alemtuzumab TCD allo-HSCT from unrelated donors (URD). The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of significant CMV infection (defined as viremia leading to preemptive antiviral therapy or CMV disease) within 100 days post-transplant. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative incidence of acute GvHD (grade ≥ 2), the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GvHD, and overall survival. A total of 84 alemtuzumab TCD URD allo-HSCT recipients were included in the analysis, 30 of whom received letermovir (letermovir group) and 54 who did not receive letermovir (control group). The median age was 59 years (range: 26-75 years) and 55.5 years (range: 20-73 years) in the letermovir and control group, respectively. Most recipients (66.7%) in both groups received unrelated matched allografts, and myeloid neoplasms were the most common indication for allo-HSCT. A significantly lower cumulative incidence of significant CMV infection within 100 days was seen in the letermovir group compared to the control group (10.0% [95% CI: 2.5-23.9%] versus 55.6% [95% CI: 41.2-67.8%], P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of acute GvHD (grade ≥ 2) or overall survival between the 2 groups. However, lower rates of extensive chronic GvHD were noted in the letermovir group (10.5% [95% CI: 2.6-24.9%] versus. 36.5% [95% CI: 23.6-49.5%], P = .0126). These results demonstrate the efficacy of letermovir in decreasing the rates of clinically significant CMV infection in patients undergoing alemtuzumab T-cell depleted allo-HSCT.

Despite the use of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) for almost 40 years and its persistence as standard of care in transplantation-eligible patients with MM even after the advent of novel agents, AHCT remains underutilized, especially in racial and ethnic minority populations. As part of a multipronged effort to quantify disparities in AHCT utilization in MM by race and ethnicity and over time in our own cancer center, we conducted an institutional review of all new patients seen at an academic transplant center for consultation for MM between 2012 and 2022, to calculate AHCT utilization and investigate the factors associated with AHCT utilization. Race and ethnicity were self-reported. Baseline characteristics were analyzed in 3 groups: non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Others. Reasons for not undergoing AHCT in the EHR were recorded. Multivariate analyses evaluated the effect of group on AHCT utilization, controlling for covariates related to patients not undergoing AHCT by overall cohort and consult period. Of the 1266 patients, 13.4% were NHB. The median age at consult was 66 (IQR, 23-97) years overall, 66 (IQR, 23-97) years for NHWs, 63 (IQR, 25-85) years for NHBs, and 59.5 (IQR, 31-79) years for Others (P < .01). AHCT utilization was 76% overall, 64.7% in NHBs, 76.8% in Others, and 77.8% in NHWs (P < .01). Age, cytogenetics, stage, comorbidities, and time from diagnosis to consult were associated with receipt of AHCT. From 2012-2017 to 2018-2022, NHB AHCT utilization increased from 57.5% to 69.8% (P = .10). For those who did not receive AHCT, patient preference, older age, comorbidity, early mortality, and lack of caregiver support were the most frequently documented reasons. The NHW group had greater AHCT utilization compared to the NHB group (odds ratio [OR], 3.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.17-5.08; P < .0001). Absent cardiac (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.35-2.62; P = .0002) or renal comorbidity (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.03-5.15; P < .0001) was associated with receipt of AHCT. Older age at consult (OR, .89; 95% CI, .87-.90; P < .0001) and longer time from diagnosis to consult (OR, .97; 95% CI, .95-.98; P < .0001) were associated with lower AHCT utilization. While AHCT utilization increased from 2012-2017 to 2018-2022 in NHBs compared to NHWs, it remained significantly lower. Racial and ethnic AHCT underutilization has improved over time, but disparities persist. Younger age at consult, shorter time from diagnosis to consult, and lack of cardiac and renal comorbidities also are associated with AHCT utilization.

Despite the established potentially curative role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in managing myelofibrosis (MF), the choice of alternative donors for patients lacking matched donors remains a challenge, and the optimal graft source in this disease entity continues to be an ongoing debate. We aimed to evaluate the impact of donor type: umbilical cord blood transplant supported with CD34+ selected haploidentical donor (haplo-cord) versus adult matched related donor (MRD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) in 40 adult patients with primary or secondary MF, including those progressing to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP), who underwent their first allo-HCT. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the impact of stem cell source on primary endpoints of overall survival (OS), graft-versus-host disease, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Median follow-up for all alive patients was 53 months (range 0.3-63 months). Nine patients (22.5%) underwent an MRD allo-HCT, 15 patients (37.5%) underwent a MUD allo-HCT, and 16 patients (40%) underwent a haplo-cord allo-HCT. Four patients died without neutrophil engraftment: 3 (19%) in haplo-cord group and one (4%) in MRD/MUD group. The cumulative incidence of absolute neutrophil engraftment by day 60 was 80% (95% CI 45-94) in the haplo-cord group and 92% (95% CI 65-98) in the MRD/MUD group (P = .09). The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment by day 60 was 59% (95% CI 27-81) in haplo-cord group and 75% (95% CI 51-88) in MRD/MUD group (P = .4). OS was 62% at 1 year (95% CI 49-79) and 34% at 3 years (95% CI 21-55). The 3-year OS was similar between the haplo-cord group and the MRD/MUD (37% versus 32%, P = .9). The 1-year OS for AP/BP patients was 50% (95% CI 27-93) in the haplo-cord group, compared to 40% (95% CI 19-86) in the MRD/MUD. The 1-year OS for chronic phase CP patients was 83% (95% CI 58-100) in the haplo-cord group, compared to 79% (95% CI 60-100) in the MRD/MUD group. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years in the haplo-cord group was 13% (95% CI 1.8-34), and in the MRD/MUD group was 28% (95% CI 10-49) (P = .36). One-year NRM was 38% (95% CI 15-61) in the haplo-cord group and 33% (95% CI 15-52) in the MRD/MUD group. Three-year NRM was 48% (95% CI 19-72) in the haplo-cord group and 54% (95% CI 29-73) in MRD/MUD group (P = .95). We showed no significant difference in OS, relapse, and NRM outcomes after haplo-cord transplant compared to adult matched donors' grafts (MRD or MUD) in MF patients. However, there were more graft failures in patients transplanted with a haplo-cord transplants and delayed engraftments with inadequate haplo myeloid bridges. Despite the small sample size in our study, considering our findings and the availability of other alternative donors, using haplo-cord platforms may no longer be justified for MF unless the UCB engraftment dynamics can be optimized.