Pub Date : 2024-08-13DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.007
Omar Albanyan, Hany Elmariah, Denise Kalos, Jongphil Kim, Rawan Faramand, David Sallman, Asmita Mishra, Kendra Sweet, Lia Perez, Jose Ochoa-Bayona, Michael Nieder, Rami Komrokji, Jeffery Lancet, Hugo Fernandez, Taiga Nishihori, Joseph Pidala, Claudio Anasetti, Nelli Bejanyan
Fludarabine (Flu) and melphalan (Mel) reduced-intensity conditioning is frequently used for allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, there is limited evidence on the impact of Mel dosing on toxicities and clinical outcomes of allo-HCT. We retrospectively compared 8/8 HLA-matched donor allo-HCT outcomes of 345 patients with AML or MDS receiving total Mel dose of 100 mg/m2 (Mel-100, n = 62) versus 140 mg/m2 (Mel-140, n = 283) in combination with Flu. Median age at allo-HCT was 66 years and median follow-up was 36.5 months. For Mel-100 versus Mel-140 groups, any grade gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity rates were 40.3% versus 67.8% (P < .001), day 100 grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rates were 21.0% versus 43.1% (P = .001) and 2-year chronic GVHD rates were 17.4% versus 27.1% (P = .033). In multivariable analysis, Mel-140 resulted in higher risks of GI toxicity (HR = 1.83, P = .013), grade II to IV acute GVHD (HR=2.35, P = .003), and moderate/severe chronic GVHD (HR = 3.13, P = .007). Total Mel dose had no independent impact on oral mucositis, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. While independent validation of our observation is warranted, our findings support using Mel-100 in combination with Flu to minimize allo-HCT toxicities and morbidities related to GVHD.
{"title":"Melphalan Dose in Combination With Fludarabine Affects Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Allogeneic Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes.","authors":"Omar Albanyan, Hany Elmariah, Denise Kalos, Jongphil Kim, Rawan Faramand, David Sallman, Asmita Mishra, Kendra Sweet, Lia Perez, Jose Ochoa-Bayona, Michael Nieder, Rami Komrokji, Jeffery Lancet, Hugo Fernandez, Taiga Nishihori, Joseph Pidala, Claudio Anasetti, Nelli Bejanyan","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fludarabine (Flu) and melphalan (Mel) reduced-intensity conditioning is frequently used for allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, there is limited evidence on the impact of Mel dosing on toxicities and clinical outcomes of allo-HCT. We retrospectively compared 8/8 HLA-matched donor allo-HCT outcomes of 345 patients with AML or MDS receiving total Mel dose of 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (Mel-100, n = 62) versus 140 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (Mel-140, n = 283) in combination with Flu. Median age at allo-HCT was 66 years and median follow-up was 36.5 months. For Mel-100 versus Mel-140 groups, any grade gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity rates were 40.3% versus 67.8% (P < .001), day 100 grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rates were 21.0% versus 43.1% (P = .001) and 2-year chronic GVHD rates were 17.4% versus 27.1% (P = .033). In multivariable analysis, Mel-140 resulted in higher risks of GI toxicity (HR = 1.83, P = .013), grade II to IV acute GVHD (HR=2.35, P = .003), and moderate/severe chronic GVHD (HR = 3.13, P = .007). Total Mel dose had no independent impact on oral mucositis, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. While independent validation of our observation is warranted, our findings support using Mel-100 in combination with Flu to minimize allo-HCT toxicities and morbidities related to GVHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-08DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.005
<div><div>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the sole curative treatment for most patients with hematologic malignancies. A well-matched donor (related or unrelated) remains the preferred donor for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT; however, a large number of patients rely on alternative donor choices of mismatched related (haploidentical) or unrelated donors to access HCT. In this retrospective study, we investigated outcomes of patients who underwent mismatched donor (related or unrelated) HCT with a radiation-based myeloablative conditioning MAC regimen in combination with fludarabine, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as higher-intensity graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We retrospectively assessed HCT outcomes in 155 patients who underwent mismatched donor HCT (related/haploidentical versus unrelated [MMUD]) with fractionated-total body irradiation (fTBI) plus fludarabine and PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis at City of Hope from 2015 to 2021. Diagnoses included acute lymphoblastic leukemia (46.5%), acute myelogenous leukemia (36.1%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (6.5%). The median age at HCT was 38 years, and 126 patients (81.3%) were an ethnic minority. The Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index was ≥3 in 36.1% of the patients, and 29% had a Disease Risk Index (DRI) of high/very high. The donor type was haploidentical in 67.1% of cases and MMUD in 32.9%. At 2 years post-HCT, disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.4% and overall survival (OS) was 80.6% for all subjects. Donor type did not impact OS (hazard ratio [HR], .72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .35 to 1.49; <em>P</em> = .37) and DFS (HR, .78; 95% CI, .41 to 1.48; <em>P</em> = .44), but younger donors was associated with less grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 6.60; 95% CI, 1.80 to 24.19; <em>P</em> = .004) and less moderate or severe chronic GVHD (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.70 to 7.34; <em>P</em> < .001), with a trend toward better survival (<em>P</em> = .099). The use of an MMUD was associated with significantly faster neutrophil recovery (median, 15 days versus 16 days; <em>P</em> = .014) and platelet recovery (median, 18 days versus 24 days; <em>P</em> = .029); however, there was no difference in GVHD outcomes between the haploidentical donor and MMUD groups. Nonrelapse mortality (HR, .86; 95% CI, .34 to 2.20; <em>P</em> = .76) and relapse risk (HR, .78; 95% CI, .33 to 1.85; <em>P</em> = .57) were comparable in the 2 groups. Patient age <40 years and low-intermediate DRI showed a DFS benefit (<em>P</em> = .004 and .029, respectively). High or very high DRI was the only predictor of increased relapse (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.34; <em>P</em> = .008). In conclusion, fludarabine/fTBI with PTCy was well-tolerated in mismatched donor HCT, regardless of donor relationship to the patient, provided promising results, and increased access to HCT for patients without a matched donor, especially patients from ethnic minorities and patien
{"title":"Total Body Irradiation and Fludarabine with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Mismatched Related or Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the sole curative treatment for most patients with hematologic malignancies. A well-matched donor (related or unrelated) remains the preferred donor for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT; however, a large number of patients rely on alternative donor choices of mismatched related (haploidentical) or unrelated donors to access HCT. In this retrospective study, we investigated outcomes of patients who underwent mismatched donor (related or unrelated) HCT with a radiation-based myeloablative conditioning MAC regimen in combination with fludarabine, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as higher-intensity graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We retrospectively assessed HCT outcomes in 155 patients who underwent mismatched donor HCT (related/haploidentical versus unrelated [MMUD]) with fractionated-total body irradiation (fTBI) plus fludarabine and PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis at City of Hope from 2015 to 2021. Diagnoses included acute lymphoblastic leukemia (46.5%), acute myelogenous leukemia (36.1%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (6.5%). The median age at HCT was 38 years, and 126 patients (81.3%) were an ethnic minority. The Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index was ≥3 in 36.1% of the patients, and 29% had a Disease Risk Index (DRI) of high/very high. The donor type was haploidentical in 67.1% of cases and MMUD in 32.9%. At 2 years post-HCT, disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.4% and overall survival (OS) was 80.6% for all subjects. Donor type did not impact OS (hazard ratio [HR], .72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .35 to 1.49; <em>P</em> = .37) and DFS (HR, .78; 95% CI, .41 to 1.48; <em>P</em> = .44), but younger donors was associated with less grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 6.60; 95% CI, 1.80 to 24.19; <em>P</em> = .004) and less moderate or severe chronic GVHD (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.70 to 7.34; <em>P</em> < .001), with a trend toward better survival (<em>P</em> = .099). The use of an MMUD was associated with significantly faster neutrophil recovery (median, 15 days versus 16 days; <em>P</em> = .014) and platelet recovery (median, 18 days versus 24 days; <em>P</em> = .029); however, there was no difference in GVHD outcomes between the haploidentical donor and MMUD groups. Nonrelapse mortality (HR, .86; 95% CI, .34 to 2.20; <em>P</em> = .76) and relapse risk (HR, .78; 95% CI, .33 to 1.85; <em>P</em> = .57) were comparable in the 2 groups. Patient age <40 years and low-intermediate DRI showed a DFS benefit (<em>P</em> = .004 and .029, respectively). High or very high DRI was the only predictor of increased relapse (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.34; <em>P</em> = .008). In conclusion, fludarabine/fTBI with PTCy was well-tolerated in mismatched donor HCT, regardless of donor relationship to the patient, provided promising results, and increased access to HCT for patients without a matched donor, especially patients from ethnic minorities and patien","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141914087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.023
Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is widely used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to prevent graft failure and severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We developed a rATG-targeted dosing strategy based on the optimal areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of active rATG. This study compared the outcomes of the optimal AUC arm with nonoptimal AUC arm to assess the effect of the rATG-targeted dosing strategy. Eighty patients (median age: 32 years) with hematological malignancies who received their first haplo-PBSCT were enrolled successively. With rATG-targeted dosing, the AUC values of 60 patients (75%, optimal AUC arm) fell within the optimal range (100-148.5 UE/mL/day) and 20 fell beyond this range (nonoptimal AUC arm). In the historical control group of 102 haplo-PBSCT patients who received a fixed dose of rATG (10 mg/kg), less patients fell within the optimal range (57.8%, P = .016). Looking at the nonoptimal AUC arms in both groups, lower cumulative incidence of CMV was noted in the targeted dosing group compared with the historical control group(50.0%, 95% CI, 30.8%-72.9% versus 81.4%, 95% CI, 68.6%-91.3%; P = .004). The cumulative incidences of EBV, relapse, overall survival and disease-free survival tended to be superior in the nonoptimal AUC arm in the targeted dosing group compared with the historical control. In the targeted dosing group, the cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation on day +180 tended to be lower in the optimal AUC arm (30.0%, 95% CI, 20.1%-43.3%) compared with the nonoptimal AUC arm (50.0%, 95% CI, 30.8%-72.9%, P = .199) without statistical difference. There were no significant differences of acute or chronic GVHD, relapse, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, disease-free survival or lymphocyte reconstitution between the two arms. In conclusion, the rATG-targeted dosing strategy made the exposure of active rATG in more patients with the optimal AUC range. Even patients who fell beyond this range would still benefit from the strategy.
{"title":"Patients Beyond the Optimal Range of rATG-AUC Still Benefit from the Targeted Dosing Strategy in Unmanipulated Haplo-PBSCT","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is widely used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to prevent graft failure and severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We developed a rATG-targeted dosing strategy based on the optimal areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of active rATG. This study compared the outcomes of the optimal AUC arm with nonoptimal AUC arm to assess the effect of the rATG-targeted dosing strategy. Eighty patients (median age: 32 years) with hematological malignancies who received their first haplo-PBSCT were enrolled successively. With rATG-targeted dosing, the AUC values of 60 patients (75%, optimal AUC arm) fell within the optimal range (100-148.5 UE/mL/day) and 20 fell beyond this range (nonoptimal AUC arm). In the historical control group of 102 haplo-PBSCT patients who received a fixed dose of rATG (10 mg/kg), less patients fell within the optimal range (57.8%, <em>P</em> = .016). Looking at the nonoptimal AUC arms in both groups, lower cumulative incidence of CMV was noted in the targeted dosing group compared with the historical control group(50.0%, 95% CI, 30.8%-72.9% versus 81.4%, 95% CI, 68.6%-91.3%; <em>P</em> = .004). The cumulative incidences of EBV, relapse, overall survival and disease-free survival tended to be superior in the nonoptimal AUC arm in the targeted dosing group compared with the historical control. In the targeted dosing group, the cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation on day +180 tended to be lower in the optimal AUC arm (30.0%, 95% CI, 20.1%-43.3%) compared with the nonoptimal AUC arm (50.0%, 95% CI, 30.8%-72.9%, <em>P</em> = .199) without statistical difference. There were no significant differences of acute or chronic GVHD, relapse, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, disease-free survival or lymphocyte reconstitution between the two arms. In conclusion, the rATG-targeted dosing strategy made the exposure of active rATG in more patients with the optimal AUC range. Even patients who fell beyond this range would still benefit from the strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141902993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.027
Since the introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has become a real alternative for patients who lack other eligible donors. The standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after PTCy has been a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (up to day +35), but promising results with sirolimus (with or without MMF) and single-agent tacrolimus have been published recently. This multicenter retrospective study compared the outcomes of 372 adult haploSCT recipients who received conditioning with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF), PTCy, and additional GVHD prophylaxis with 1 of 3 strategies: cohort A, single-agent tacrolimus (n = 222); cohort B, CNI + MMF (n = 49); or cohort C, sirolimus + MMF (n = 101). No differences among the 3 cohorts were found in terms of grade II-IV acute GVHD (20% in cohort A, 25% in cohort B, and 30% in cohort C) or grade III-IV acute GVHD (9%, 6%, and 15%, respectively) at 100 days; however, cohort A had the lowest incidence of overall chronic GVHD (24%, 47%, and 52%, respectively; P = .001) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD (13%, 35%, and 33%, respectively; P = .001). There were no differences in 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse among the 3 cohorts. Overall, our study suggests that single-agent tacrolimus, CNI + MMF, and sirolimus + MMF GVHD prophylaxis lead to similar outcomes following haploSCT with TBF and PTCy, with a low incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, although possible differences in chronic GVHD require further investigation.
{"title":"Comparison of Three Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Strategies after T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Hematopoietic Transplantation: Tacrolimus versus Calcineurin Inhibitors + Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Sirolimus + Mycophenolate Mofetil","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.027","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.027","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has become a real alternative for patients who lack other eligible donors. The standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after PTCy has been a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (up to day +35), but promising results with sirolimus (with or without MMF) and single-agent tacrolimus have been published recently. This multicenter retrospective study compared the outcomes of 372 adult haploSCT recipients who received conditioning with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF), PTCy, and additional GVHD prophylaxis with 1 of 3 strategies: cohort A, single-agent tacrolimus (n = 222); cohort B, CNI + MMF (n = 49); or cohort C, sirolimus + MMF (n = 101). No differences among the 3 cohorts were found in terms of grade II-IV acute GVHD (20% in cohort A, 25% in cohort B, and 30% in cohort C) or grade III-IV acute GVHD (9%, 6%, and 15%, respectively) at 100 days; however, cohort A had the lowest incidence of overall chronic GVHD (24%, 47%, and 52%, respectively; <em>P</em> = .001) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD (13%, 35%, and 33%, respectively; <em>P</em> = .001). There were no differences in 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse among the 3 cohorts. Overall, our study suggests that single-agent tacrolimus, CNI + MMF, and sirolimus + MMF GVHD prophylaxis lead to similar outcomes following haploSCT with TBF and PTCy, with a low incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, although possible differences in chronic GVHD require further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141907811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.004
Recent evidence has indicated that measurable residual disease (MRD) markedly affects the prognosis of patients with acute leukemia post-transplantation. However, the prognostic relevance of complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi) before transplantation has not been extensively explored. In this single-center, longitudinal study, we assessed the outcomes of 466 MRD-negative acute leukemia patients who underwent single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation (sUCBT), including 117 patients with CRi. We observed that acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with CRi had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of both neutrophil (90.8% versus 96.5%) and platelet engraftment (67.2% versus 85.3%) and experienced increased transplant-related mortality (TRM) (100-day TRM: 14.2% versus 5.3%; 1-year TRM: 20.6% versus 11.3%; P = .024 and .063, respectively), mainly due to infection-related deaths, compared to those in complete remission (CR). Multivariate analysis revealed that CRi was an independent adverse predictor of both neutrophil and platelet engraftment and increased 100-day TRM in AML patients. However, CRi status did not affect relapse or reduce 5-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), or GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) in the AML cohort. Conversely, for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), CRi did not impact engraftment, TRM, relapse or survival after sUCBT. Our findings underscore that CRi status before sUCBT portends poorer engraftment outcomes and a greater TRM in AML patients, although it does not significantly affect the prognosis of ALL patients.
{"title":"The Clinical Influence of Complete Remission With Incomplete Count Recovery (CRi) on Single-Unit Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation in Patients With Acute Leukemia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent evidence has indicated that measurable residual disease (MRD) markedly affects the prognosis of patients with acute leukemia post-transplantation. However, the prognostic relevance of complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi) before transplantation has not been extensively explored. In this single-center, longitudinal study, we assessed the outcomes of 466 MRD-negative acute leukemia patients who underwent single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation (sUCBT), including 117 patients with CRi. We observed that acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with CRi had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of both neutrophil (90.8% versus 96.5%) and platelet engraftment (67.2% versus 85.3%) and experienced increased transplant-related mortality (TRM) (100-day TRM: 14.2% versus 5.3%; 1-year TRM: 20.6% versus 11.3%; <em>P</em> = .024 and .063, respectively), mainly due to infection-related deaths, compared to those in complete remission (CR). Multivariate analysis revealed that CRi was an independent adverse predictor of both neutrophil and platelet engraftment and increased 100-day TRM in AML patients. However, CRi status did not affect relapse or reduce 5-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), or GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) in the AML cohort. Conversely, for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), CRi did not impact engraftment, TRM, relapse or survival after sUCBT. Our findings underscore that CRi status before sUCBT portends poorer engraftment outcomes and a greater TRM in AML patients, although it does not significantly affect the prognosis of ALL patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141903015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-03DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.026
Current consensus recommends hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with myelofibrosis with intermediate or high-risk disease and age of less than 70 years. However, a higher chronological age should not be prohibitive for the eligibility decision in general, acknowledging that current life expectancy for the general population aged 70 years is ∼15 years, and current numbers of patients transplanted at 70 years or older is steadily increasing. The following study aimed to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of HCT in 115 myelofibrosis patients aged 70 years or older. This is a retrospective multicenter study, using the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (DRST). Adult myelofibrosis patients were included who received HCT up until 2021. Patients with secondary leukemia were excluded. Main endpoints were HCT demographics over time and outcomes after HCT (including overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival). Numbers of HCT increased over the past decade, with a significant spike since 2019. Comorbidity status of transplanted patients improved over time, while reduced-intensity conditioning was the preferred HCT platform, especially in most recent years. The 3-year overall survival was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-65%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 7% (95% CI, 3%-13%) and the 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 22% (95% CI, 14%-31%). The 3-year graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 27%-47%). Driver mutation genotype (in particular, non-CALR/MPL genotype) appeared to be the only variable that was significantly and independently associated with better survival in multivariable analysis, whereas neither comorbidity index nor dose intensity of pre-transplant conditioning appeared to influence outcome. This study demonstrated feasibility of curative treatment with HCT for myelofibrosis aged 70 or older, with significant increases in HCT numbers and improved fitness of older adults over recent years.
{"title":"Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis Aged 70 Years or Older: A Study from the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.026","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.026","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current consensus recommends hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with myelofibrosis with intermediate or high-risk disease and age of less than 70 years. However, a higher chronological age should not be prohibitive for the eligibility decision in general, acknowledging that current life expectancy for the general population aged 70 years is ∼15 years, and current numbers of patients transplanted at 70 years or older is steadily increasing. The following study aimed to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of HCT in 115 myelofibrosis patients aged 70 years or older. This is a retrospective multicenter study, using the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (DRST). Adult myelofibrosis patients were included who received HCT up until 2021. Patients with secondary leukemia were excluded. Main endpoints were HCT demographics over time and outcomes after HCT (including overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival). Numbers of HCT increased over the past decade, with a significant spike since 2019. Comorbidity status of transplanted patients improved over time, while reduced-intensity conditioning was the preferred HCT platform, especially in most recent years. The 3-year overall survival was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-65%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 7% (95% CI, 3%-13%) and the 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 22% (95% CI, 14%-31%). The 3-year graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 27%-47%). Driver mutation genotype (in particular, non-<em>CALR/MPL</em> genotype) appeared to be the only variable that was significantly and independently associated with better survival in multivariable analysis, whereas neither comorbidity index nor dose intensity of pre-transplant conditioning appeared to influence outcome. This study demonstrated feasibility of curative treatment with HCT for myelofibrosis aged 70 or older, with significant increases in HCT numbers and improved fitness of older adults over recent years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663672400558X/pdfft?md5=681ce573fd5fe6cef8dee39cc77e3221&pid=1-s2.0-S266663672400558X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-03DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.024
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is commonly included in post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). In the non-PTCy setting, higher MMF dose/kg has been shown to reduce rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). When used in conjunction with PTCy, MMF is dosed at 15 mg/kg three times daily up to a maximum dose of 3 g/day. Thus, patients who weigh ≥67 kg receive 3 g/day and a variable dose/kg of MMF. We investigated the impact of MMF dose/kg on clinical outcomes following haploidentical PBSCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. All consecutive adult patients with hematologic malignancies receiving haploidentical T cell replete peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) with PTCy/MMF and either tacrolimus or sirolimus at the Moffitt Cancer Center or City of Hope between April 2014-August 2020 were included. For analyses, MMF dose relative to patient actual body weight (mg/kg/day), was stratified into categories of low (<29 mg/kg/day), low intermediate (29-34 mg/kg/day), high intermediate (35-41 mg/kg/day), and high (>41 mg/kg/day). Three hundred eighty-six patients were included. Of these, 54 patients received low dose, 73 low intermediate, 137 high intermediate and 122 high dose MMF by relative weight exposure. In multivariate analysis, low MMF dose exposure was associated with reduced rates of relapse in comparison to the high dose group (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.94, P = .03). This led to superior PFS among patients with low compared to high MMF dose exposure (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.99, P = .045). MMF relative dose exposure was not associated with engraftment, GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, or OS. In this study of patients receiving haploidentical PBSCT with PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis, low MMF dose/kg was associated with improved rates of relapse and PFS. Future prospective studies should investigate optimal dosing strategies of MMF when given with the PTCy regimen.
{"title":"Lower Weight-Based Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing is Associated with Superior Outcomes after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplant with Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.024","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.024","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is commonly included in post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). In the non-PTCy setting, higher MMF dose/kg has been shown to reduce rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). When used in conjunction with PTCy, MMF is dosed at 15 mg/kg three times daily up to a maximum dose of 3 g/day. Thus, patients who weigh ≥67 kg receive 3 g/day and a variable dose/kg of MMF. We investigated the impact of MMF dose/kg on clinical outcomes following haploidentical PBSCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. All consecutive adult patients with hematologic malignancies receiving haploidentical T cell replete peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) with PTCy/MMF and either tacrolimus or sirolimus at the Moffitt Cancer Center or City of Hope between April 2014-August 2020 were included. For analyses, MMF dose relative to patient actual body weight (mg/kg/day), was stratified into categories of low (<29 mg/kg/day), low intermediate (29-34 mg/kg/day), high intermediate (35-41 mg/kg/day), and high (>41 mg/kg/day). Three hundred eighty-six patients were included. Of these, 54 patients received low dose, 73 low intermediate, 137 high intermediate and 122 high dose MMF by relative weight exposure. In multivariate analysis, low MMF dose exposure was associated with reduced rates of relapse in comparison to the high dose group (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.94, <em>P</em> = .03). This led to superior PFS among patients with low compared to high MMF dose exposure (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.99, <em>P</em> = .045). MMF relative dose exposure was not associated with engraftment, GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, or OS. In this study of patients receiving haploidentical PBSCT with PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis, low MMF dose/kg was associated with improved rates of relapse and PFS. Future prospective studies should investigate optimal dosing strategies of MMF when given with the PTCy regimen.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.025
High-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) remains a viable consolidation strategy for a subset of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphomas. BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) is widely recognized as the predominant conditioning regimen due to its satisfactory efficacy and tolerability. Nevertheless, shortages of carmustine and melphalan have compelled clinicians to explore alternative conditioning regimens. The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and transplant outcomes following BEAM, CBV (carmustine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide), BuMel (busulfan, melphalan), and BendaEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). We retrospectively analyzed data from 213 patients (CBV 65, BuMel 42, BEAM 68, BendaEAM 38) with R/R lymphomas undergoing AHCT between 2014 and 2020. Multivariate models were employed to evaluate toxicity and transplant outcomes based on conditioning type. Among grade III to IV toxicities, oral mucositis was more frequently observed with BuMel (45%) and BendaEAM (24%) compared to BEAM (15%) and CVB (6%, P ≤ .001). Diarrhea was more common with BendaEAM (42%) and less frequent with BuMel (7%, P = .01). Acute kidney injury was only found after BendaEAM (11%). Febrile neutropenia and infectious complications were more frequent following BendaEAM. Frequencies of other treatment-related toxicities did not significantly differ according to conditioning type. BendaEAM (odds ratio [OR] 3.07, P = .014) and BuMel (OR 4.27, P = .002) were independently associated with higher grade III to IV toxicity up to D+100. However, there were no significant differences in relapse/progression, nonrelapse mortality, progression-free survival, or overall survival among the four regimens. BuMel and BendaEAM were associated with a higher rate of grade III to IV toxicity. Carmustine-based regimens appeared to be less toxic and safer; however, there were no significant differences in transplant outcomes. The utilization of alternative preparative regimens due to drug shortages may potentially lead to increased toxicity after AHCT for lymphoma.
{"title":"Early Toxicity and Efficacy of Four Different Conditioning Regimens for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Lymphoma: Impact of Drug Shortages in a Resource-Constrained Country","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.025","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.025","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) remains a viable consolidation strategy for a subset of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphomas. BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) is widely recognized as the predominant conditioning regimen due to its satisfactory efficacy and tolerability. Nevertheless, shortages of carmustine and melphalan have compelled clinicians to explore alternative conditioning regimens. The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and transplant outcomes following BEAM, CBV (carmustine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide), BuMel (busulfan, melphalan), and BendaEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). We retrospectively analyzed data from 213 patients (CBV 65, BuMel 42, BEAM 68, BendaEAM 38) with R/R lymphomas undergoing AHCT between 2014 and 2020. Multivariate models were employed to evaluate toxicity and transplant outcomes based on conditioning type. Among grade III to IV toxicities, oral mucositis was more frequently observed with BuMel (45%) and BendaEAM (24%) compared to BEAM (15%) and CVB (6%, <em>P</em> ≤ .001). Diarrhea was more common with BendaEAM (42%) and less frequent with BuMel (7%, <em>P</em> = .01). Acute kidney injury was only found after BendaEAM (11%). Febrile neutropenia and infectious complications were more frequent following BendaEAM. Frequencies of other treatment-related toxicities did not significantly differ according to conditioning type. BendaEAM (odds ratio [OR] 3.07, <em>P</em> = .014) and BuMel (OR 4.27, <em>P</em> = .002) were independently associated with higher grade III to IV toxicity up to D+100. However, there were no significant differences in relapse/progression, nonrelapse mortality, progression-free survival, or overall survival among the four regimens. BuMel and BendaEAM were associated with a higher rate of grade III to IV toxicity. Carmustine-based regimens appeared to be less toxic and safer; however, there were no significant differences in transplant outcomes. The utilization of alternative preparative regimens due to drug shortages may potentially lead to increased toxicity after AHCT for lymphoma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.002
{"title":"Inspiration From Leaders Who Dare To Care","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.003
{"title":"How to Run a Successful Transplant Program in Older Patients with Myeloid Malignancies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号