Pub Date : 2025-06-07DOI: 10.1186/s40794-025-00250-7
Colin Musara, Frank Kapungu
Leptospirosis is a zoonosis of global distribution. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has designated leptospirosis a nationally notifiable disease. There is need to raise awareness of the burden of leptospirosis among health care givers and policy makers in Africa. The aim of this review was to highlight the current situation of leptospirosis in Africa and suggest a One Health approach of addressing its status as a leading zoonosis. In tropical regions, the nonspecific symptoms of fever, myalgia and arthralgia result in misdiagnosis of leptospirosis with malaria, yellow fever, typhoid fever, dengue fever, brucellosis, rickettsiosis, and babesiosis. Urinalysis presents an inexpensive diagnostic aid for leptospirosis. Humans with leptospirosis exhibit proteinuria, glucosuria, pyuria, haematuria and granular casts resulting from acute kidney injury. Therapeutic guidelines for empirical treatment of febrile patients should be considered. Febrile patients who test negative for malaria and yellow fever can benefit from doxycycline, which also treats brucellosis, rickettsiosis and typhoid fever. Control of leptospirosis should also address Leptospira infection in domestic animal reservoirs through vaccination of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and dogs in endemic areas. Treatment of sick animals with streptomycin eliminates the carrier status, curbing leptospiruria and spread of infection. Rodents are important in transmission of Leptospira to humans in urban slums and rural settings therefore rodent control strategies help in reducing transmission of leptospirosis. Indirect transmission of Leptospira occurs through contact with water, vegetation, or soil contaminated with infected urine. Drinking water should be drawn from protected sources or chlorinated before household use.
{"title":"Addressing the burden of leptospirosis in Africa.","authors":"Colin Musara, Frank Kapungu","doi":"10.1186/s40794-025-00250-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40794-025-00250-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leptospirosis is a zoonosis of global distribution. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has designated leptospirosis a nationally notifiable disease. There is need to raise awareness of the burden of leptospirosis among health care givers and policy makers in Africa. The aim of this review was to highlight the current situation of leptospirosis in Africa and suggest a One Health approach of addressing its status as a leading zoonosis. In tropical regions, the nonspecific symptoms of fever, myalgia and arthralgia result in misdiagnosis of leptospirosis with malaria, yellow fever, typhoid fever, dengue fever, brucellosis, rickettsiosis, and babesiosis. Urinalysis presents an inexpensive diagnostic aid for leptospirosis. Humans with leptospirosis exhibit proteinuria, glucosuria, pyuria, haematuria and granular casts resulting from acute kidney injury. Therapeutic guidelines for empirical treatment of febrile patients should be considered. Febrile patients who test negative for malaria and yellow fever can benefit from doxycycline, which also treats brucellosis, rickettsiosis and typhoid fever. Control of leptospirosis should also address Leptospira infection in domestic animal reservoirs through vaccination of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and dogs in endemic areas. Treatment of sick animals with streptomycin eliminates the carrier status, curbing leptospiruria and spread of infection. Rodents are important in transmission of Leptospira to humans in urban slums and rural settings therefore rodent control strategies help in reducing transmission of leptospirosis. Indirect transmission of Leptospira occurs through contact with water, vegetation, or soil contaminated with infected urine. Drinking water should be drawn from protected sources or chlorinated before household use.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144249776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-03DOI: 10.1186/s40794-025-00255-2
Maria I Otto, Klaske J Vliegenthart-Jongbloed, Jaap J van Hellemond, Perry Jj van Genderen
Background: The spleen plays a vital role in combating Plasmodium infections, particularly during the erythrocytic stage of the infection. Asplenia may notably affect disease progression and parasite clearance dynamics. More insight is needed as to whether asplenic malaria patients - beyond considerations of parasite load - also face a higher burden of disease caused by malaria-specific manifestations of organ dysfunction and/or metabolic deterioration.
Methods: A case-control study was conducted comparing splenectomized malaria patients with non-splenectomized individuals at comparable parasitemia levels. Control subjects were sourced from the Rotterdam Malaria Cohort Study. Due to the cohort's limited asplenic cases, a systematic literature review identified 13 additional asplenic malaria cases. Each case was matched for age and P. falciparum parasitemia level with 3 control subjects resulting in 45 case-control paired observations.
Findings: The study included a total of 60 P.falciparum malaria patients, comprising 15 splenectomized patients (cases) and 45 non-splenectomized patients (controls). Eleven of 15 cases (73%) met WHO criteria for severe disease, in contrast to 21 of 45 (47%) matched controls. Cases had significantly longer median duration of hospitalizations (10 versus 5.5 days) and higher rates of hemodynamic instability. Splenectomized malaria patients had a significantly 3-fold higher odds of experiencing WHO-defined severe disease malaria (OR 3.14 (95% CI 1.30-7.60)) than matched controls.
Conclusion: The findings of this case-control study suggest that - at comparable levels of parasitemia - P. falciparum malaria infections in asplenic individuals may run a more severe course as compared with individuals who have not undergone splenectomy.
背景:脾脏在对抗疟原虫感染中起着至关重要的作用,特别是在感染的红细胞阶段。脾虚可能显著影响疾病进展和寄生虫清除动力学。需要更深入地了解,除了寄生虫负荷的考虑之外,无脾疟疾患者是否也面临由疟疾特有的器官功能障碍和/或代谢恶化的表现引起的更高的疾病负担。方法:采用病例对照研究的方法,对疟疾脾切除患者和未脾切除患者进行比较。对照对象来自鹿特丹疟疾队列研究。由于该队列的无脾病例有限,系统的文献回顾确定了另外13例无脾疟疾病例。每个病例的年龄和恶性疟原虫水平与3名对照受试者相匹配,产生45例病例-对照配对观察。结果:本研究共纳入60例恶性疟患者,其中脾切除术患者(病例)15例,未脾切除术患者(对照组)45例。15例中有11例(73%)符合世卫组织的严重疾病标准,而45例中有21例(47%)符合对照。病例的中位住院时间明显更长(10天对5.5天),血流动力学不稳定的发生率更高。脾切除疟疾患者经历世卫组织定义的重症疟疾的几率(OR 3.14 (95% CI 1.30-7.60))比匹配对照组显著高出3倍。结论:这项病例对照研究的结果表明,在寄生虫血症水平相当的情况下,无脾个体的恶性疟原虫疟疾感染可能比未接受脾切除术的个体更严重。
{"title":"Plasmodium falciparum malaria runs a more severe course in splenectomized patients at comparable levels of parasitemia: a retrospective matched case-control study.","authors":"Maria I Otto, Klaske J Vliegenthart-Jongbloed, Jaap J van Hellemond, Perry Jj van Genderen","doi":"10.1186/s40794-025-00255-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40794-025-00255-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spleen plays a vital role in combating Plasmodium infections, particularly during the erythrocytic stage of the infection. Asplenia may notably affect disease progression and parasite clearance dynamics. More insight is needed as to whether asplenic malaria patients - beyond considerations of parasite load - also face a higher burden of disease caused by malaria-specific manifestations of organ dysfunction and/or metabolic deterioration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study was conducted comparing splenectomized malaria patients with non-splenectomized individuals at comparable parasitemia levels. Control subjects were sourced from the Rotterdam Malaria Cohort Study. Due to the cohort's limited asplenic cases, a systematic literature review identified 13 additional asplenic malaria cases. Each case was matched for age and P. falciparum parasitemia level with 3 control subjects resulting in 45 case-control paired observations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The study included a total of 60 P.falciparum malaria patients, comprising 15 splenectomized patients (cases) and 45 non-splenectomized patients (controls). Eleven of 15 cases (73%) met WHO criteria for severe disease, in contrast to 21 of 45 (47%) matched controls. Cases had significantly longer median duration of hospitalizations (10 versus 5.5 days) and higher rates of hemodynamic instability. Splenectomized malaria patients had a significantly 3-fold higher odds of experiencing WHO-defined severe disease malaria (OR 3.14 (95% CI 1.30-7.60)) than matched controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this case-control study suggest that - at comparable levels of parasitemia - P. falciparum malaria infections in asplenic individuals may run a more severe course as compared with individuals who have not undergone splenectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131750/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144209627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1186/s40794-025-00249-0
Daniel Begemann, Cristina Alonso, Samantha Bates, Edward T Ryan, Allison T Walker, Barry Keppard, Ann Marie Kissel, Flor Amaya, Sowmya R Rao, Tyler S Brown, Amir M Mohareb, Julie H Levison, Regina C LaRocque
Airports may be high-risk sites for the spread of infectious diseases, including novel respiratory pathogens. While many studies have evaluated the higher burden of COVID-19 among essential workers, few studies have specifically analyzed the links between airport workers and surrounding communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used GPS-derived mobility data to estimate work- and travel-related visits from approximately 5000 Boston-area census block groups to Logan International Airport between January 2020 and August 2021. We stratified origin census block groups by their census tract-level Social Vulnerability Index and compared temporal trends and work-related airport visits across Social Vulnerability Index quartiles. Work-related visits to Boston Logan International Airport were more likely to originate from socially vulnerable communities (i.e., in the highest Social Vulnerability Index quartile), including cities that experienced disproportionately high rates of COVID-19 infection early during the COVID-19 pandemic (East Boston, Revere and Chelsea, Massachusetts). These differences persisted across the duration of the observation period. Our findings highlight higher social vulnerability and strong work-related mobility connections with an international travel hub as important overlapping risk factors in these urban communities. Protecting airport workers and their home communities from imported infectious diseases merits further attention as a public health priority.
{"title":"Work-related connectivity between Boston Logan international airport and urban communities with high social vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Daniel Begemann, Cristina Alonso, Samantha Bates, Edward T Ryan, Allison T Walker, Barry Keppard, Ann Marie Kissel, Flor Amaya, Sowmya R Rao, Tyler S Brown, Amir M Mohareb, Julie H Levison, Regina C LaRocque","doi":"10.1186/s40794-025-00249-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40794-025-00249-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Airports may be high-risk sites for the spread of infectious diseases, including novel respiratory pathogens. While many studies have evaluated the higher burden of COVID-19 among essential workers, few studies have specifically analyzed the links between airport workers and surrounding communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used GPS-derived mobility data to estimate work- and travel-related visits from approximately 5000 Boston-area census block groups to Logan International Airport between January 2020 and August 2021. We stratified origin census block groups by their census tract-level Social Vulnerability Index and compared temporal trends and work-related airport visits across Social Vulnerability Index quartiles. Work-related visits to Boston Logan International Airport were more likely to originate from socially vulnerable communities (i.e., in the highest Social Vulnerability Index quartile), including cities that experienced disproportionately high rates of COVID-19 infection early during the COVID-19 pandemic (East Boston, Revere and Chelsea, Massachusetts). These differences persisted across the duration of the observation period. Our findings highlight higher social vulnerability and strong work-related mobility connections with an international travel hub as important overlapping risk factors in these urban communities. Protecting airport workers and their home communities from imported infectious diseases merits further attention as a public health priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126863/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144192289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Malaria during pregnancy poses significant risks to both the mother and the developing fetus. For pregnant women, the infection can result in severe illness and even death. Parasite sequestration in the placenta can cause maternal anemia and increase the risk of mortality both during and after childbirth. Malaria is also a major contributor to stillbirths and preterm births. Infected placental tissue can impede fetal growth, resulting in low birth weight, which is linked to delayed growth and cognitive development in the child. Furthermore, malaria during pregnancy remains a major contributor to perinatal, neonatal, and infant mortality.
Objectives: To review the epidemiological patterns of malaria in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and neonatal health, and to analyze the availability and effectiveness of drug treatment options.
Methods: Relevant articles published only in English were searched using electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Pro-Quest. Keywords including "'malaria in pregnancy", "placental malaria", "congenital malaria", "treatment options", and "nutrition intervention and intermittent preventive treatment" were used in combination. Of the total of 4,486 articles identified, 139 articles were ultimately included. Whereas, others were excluded due to duplication, irrelevant abstract, title, and quality assessment.
Results: From 139 included studies, 47 focused on epidemiology of malaria in pregnancy, 58 on its impact and 16 on treatment options and 18 on nutrition intervention and intermittent treatment. Plasmodium falciparum is the leading cause of complications in pregnant women and is primarily found in Africa, while P.vivax is recognized as an emerging global threat, and causing serious consequences. Other species, such as P.knowlesi, P.ovale, and P.malariae are less common. Malaria prevalence in pregnancy can reach 60% in sub-Saharan Africa and 36% globally, with placental malaria affecting up to 28% of cases. The disease causes serious complications such as maternal anemia, premature birth, and low birth weight, severe anemia and increased maternal and infant mortality. Prevention strategies like intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp), insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and Indoor residual spray (IRS) are essential. Early diagnosis and treatment can reverse adverse effects on placental and congenital function. Artesunate is recommended for severe malaria in all trimesters. Even resistance to chloroquine reported in some areas, it is the drug of choice for uncomplicated P.vivax infections.
Conclusions: Malaria during pregnancy significantly impacts maternal and fetal health, leading to anemia, growth restriction, preterm birth, and neonatal death. Infants born to mothers with malaria are more likely to contract the disease. Further research and improved treatment strategies are
背景:怀孕期间的疟疾对母亲和发育中的胎儿都有重大风险。对于孕妇来说,这种感染会导致严重的疾病甚至死亡。胎盘中寄生虫的隔离会导致母体贫血,并增加分娩期间和分娩后的死亡风险。疟疾也是造成死产和早产的一个主要因素。受感染的胎盘组织可阻碍胎儿生长,导致出生体重过低,这与儿童生长和认知发育迟缓有关。此外,怀孕期间的疟疾仍然是围产期、新生儿和婴儿死亡的一个主要原因。目的:审查妊娠期疟疾的流行病学模式及其对孕产妇和新生儿健康的影响,并分析药物治疗方案的可得性和有效性。方法:使用PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Pro-Quest等电子数据库检索相关英文文献。关键词包括“孕期疟疾”、“胎盘疟疾”、“先天性疟疾”、“治疗方案”、“营养干预与间歇预防治疗”。在确定的4486篇文章中,最终纳入了139篇文章。然而,由于重复、不相关的摘要、标题和质量评估,其他文献被排除。结果:139项纳入的研究中,47项关注妊娠期疟疾流行病学,58项关注其影响,16项关注治疗方案,18项关注营养干预和间歇性治疗。恶性疟原虫是孕妇并发症的主要原因,主要在非洲发现,而间日疟原虫被认为是一种新出现的全球威胁,并造成严重后果。其他种类,如诺氏疟原虫、卵形疟原虫和疟疾疟原虫不太常见。妊娠期疟疾流行率在撒哈拉以南非洲可达60%,在全球可达36%,其中胎盘疟疾影响的病例高达28%。该病引起严重并发症,如产妇贫血、早产、低出生体重、严重贫血和母婴死亡率增加。间歇性预防治疗(IPTp)、驱虫蚊帐(ITNs)和室内残留喷雾(IRS)等预防策略至关重要。早期诊断和治疗可逆转对胎盘和先天性功能的不良影响。建议在所有妊娠期使用青蒿琥酯治疗严重疟疾。甚至在一些地区报告了对氯喹的耐药性,它是治疗无并发症间日疟原虫感染的首选药物。结论:妊娠期疟疾显著影响孕产妇和胎儿健康,导致贫血、生长受限、早产和新生儿死亡。患有疟疾的母亲所生的婴儿更有可能感染这种疾病。需要进一步的研究和改进的治疗策略来有效地解决这一问题。
{"title":"Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review.","authors":"Awoke Minwuyelet, Delenasaw Yewhalaw, Melkamu Siferih, Getnet Atenafu","doi":"10.1186/s40794-025-00248-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40794-025-00248-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria during pregnancy poses significant risks to both the mother and the developing fetus. For pregnant women, the infection can result in severe illness and even death. Parasite sequestration in the placenta can cause maternal anemia and increase the risk of mortality both during and after childbirth. Malaria is also a major contributor to stillbirths and preterm births. Infected placental tissue can impede fetal growth, resulting in low birth weight, which is linked to delayed growth and cognitive development in the child. Furthermore, malaria during pregnancy remains a major contributor to perinatal, neonatal, and infant mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the epidemiological patterns of malaria in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and neonatal health, and to analyze the availability and effectiveness of drug treatment options.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant articles published only in English were searched using electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Pro-Quest. Keywords including \"'malaria in pregnancy\", \"placental malaria\", \"congenital malaria\", \"treatment options\", and \"nutrition intervention and intermittent preventive treatment\" were used in combination. Of the total of 4,486 articles identified, 139 articles were ultimately included. Whereas, others were excluded due to duplication, irrelevant abstract, title, and quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 139 included studies, 47 focused on epidemiology of malaria in pregnancy, 58 on its impact and 16 on treatment options and 18 on nutrition intervention and intermittent treatment. Plasmodium falciparum is the leading cause of complications in pregnant women and is primarily found in Africa, while P.vivax is recognized as an emerging global threat, and causing serious consequences. Other species, such as P.knowlesi, P.ovale, and P.malariae are less common. Malaria prevalence in pregnancy can reach 60% in sub-Saharan Africa and 36% globally, with placental malaria affecting up to 28% of cases. The disease causes serious complications such as maternal anemia, premature birth, and low birth weight, severe anemia and increased maternal and infant mortality. Prevention strategies like intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp), insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and Indoor residual spray (IRS) are essential. Early diagnosis and treatment can reverse adverse effects on placental and congenital function. Artesunate is recommended for severe malaria in all trimesters. Even resistance to chloroquine reported in some areas, it is the drug of choice for uncomplicated P.vivax infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Malaria during pregnancy significantly impacts maternal and fetal health, leading to anemia, growth restriction, preterm birth, and neonatal death. Infants born to mothers with malaria are more likely to contract the disease. Further research and improved treatment strategies are","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096600/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144120940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-15DOI: 10.1186/s40794-025-00246-3
Kesaobaka Batisani
The emergence of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines has marked a seminal shift in the field of immunization, heralding an era characterized by unprecedented speed and efficacy in the face of infectious diseases. The global crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the rapid development and deployment of two leading mRNA vaccines, Comirnaty and SpikeVax, showcasing not only the technological promise of mRNA, but also its transformative potential in public health strategies. This study seeks to provide an in-depth exploration of the foundational elements of mRNA vaccine technology, elucidate its unique advantages over traditional vaccine platforms, analyze the existing challenges that public health officials face, and envision future applications that extend far beyond current expectations. Through this exploration, we advocate for the integration of mRNA technology into existing public health frameworks to enhance global health security and adaptability in the face of emerging infectious threats.
{"title":"The role of mRNA vaccines in infectious diseases: a new era of immunization.","authors":"Kesaobaka Batisani","doi":"10.1186/s40794-025-00246-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-025-00246-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines has marked a seminal shift in the field of immunization, heralding an era characterized by unprecedented speed and efficacy in the face of infectious diseases. The global crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the rapid development and deployment of two leading mRNA vaccines, Comirnaty and SpikeVax, showcasing not only the technological promise of mRNA, but also its transformative potential in public health strategies. This study seeks to provide an in-depth exploration of the foundational elements of mRNA vaccine technology, elucidate its unique advantages over traditional vaccine platforms, analyze the existing challenges that public health officials face, and envision future applications that extend far beyond current expectations. Through this exploration, we advocate for the integration of mRNA technology into existing public health frameworks to enhance global health security and adaptability in the face of emerging infectious threats.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079950/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144080121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-07DOI: 10.1186/s40794-025-00245-4
Olivia Nieves Echevarria, John Pickering, Valorie A Crooks, Jeremy Snyder, Trudie Milner
Background: Sexually transmitted infections are on the rise in older populations globally, including among older travellers. International retirement migrants are older people who have retired from the workforce and travel abroad seasonally, typically during the winter months in their home countries. The transnational nature of this practice may challenge public health efforts to control the spread of sexually transmitted infection and encourage treatment. This study focuses on Yuma, Arizona, a popular destination for Canadian international retirement migrants who winter in the United States, to examine the sexual health risks associated with their seasonal travel.
Methods: Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, this research involved semi-structured interviews conducted remotely with key informants in Yuma (n = 10) who held various health care and administrative roles. Participants provided insights into sexual health risks based on their extensive interactions with Canadian seasonal migrants and their knowledge of the social dynamics within retirement communities. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded using NVivo software, and thematically analyzed to identify risk factors for sexually transmitted infections among Canadian international retirement migrants wintering in Yuma.
Results: Findings revealed three main risks that may contribute to exposure to sexually transmitted infections and potential transmission: social dynamics within tight-knit retirement migrant communities that facilitate unsafe sexual practices (i.e., risky practices); barriers to accessing diagnostic services, such as costs and lack of established local care (i.e., risky care access); and challenges in following standard treatment and public health protocols due to logistical difficulties in ensuring follow-up (i.e., risky treatment decisions). Key informants noted that lifestyle choices, including the use of alcohol and drugs, can exacerbate these risks. Health care access barriers driven by travel health insurance and mobility limitations further complicate the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections for Canadian international retirement migrants while abroad.
Conclusions: This study highlights the complex interplay of social behaviours and health care barriers that heighten the risk of sexually transmitted infection transmission among Canadian retirement migrants in the transnational context of Yuma. Extended diagnostic and treatment services, comprehensive sexual health education in pre- and post-travel consultations, as well as inclusive travel health insurance coverage could significantly improve the sexual health outcomes for this population.
{"title":"\"Are they going to recollect who they need to contact?\": understanding sexually transmitted infection transmission risks among older Canadians who winter in the United States.","authors":"Olivia Nieves Echevarria, John Pickering, Valorie A Crooks, Jeremy Snyder, Trudie Milner","doi":"10.1186/s40794-025-00245-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40794-025-00245-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexually transmitted infections are on the rise in older populations globally, including among older travellers. International retirement migrants are older people who have retired from the workforce and travel abroad seasonally, typically during the winter months in their home countries. The transnational nature of this practice may challenge public health efforts to control the spread of sexually transmitted infection and encourage treatment. This study focuses on Yuma, Arizona, a popular destination for Canadian international retirement migrants who winter in the United States, to examine the sexual health risks associated with their seasonal travel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, this research involved semi-structured interviews conducted remotely with key informants in Yuma (n = 10) who held various health care and administrative roles. Participants provided insights into sexual health risks based on their extensive interactions with Canadian seasonal migrants and their knowledge of the social dynamics within retirement communities. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded using NVivo software, and thematically analyzed to identify risk factors for sexually transmitted infections among Canadian international retirement migrants wintering in Yuma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed three main risks that may contribute to exposure to sexually transmitted infections and potential transmission: social dynamics within tight-knit retirement migrant communities that facilitate unsafe sexual practices (i.e., risky practices); barriers to accessing diagnostic services, such as costs and lack of established local care (i.e., risky care access); and challenges in following standard treatment and public health protocols due to logistical difficulties in ensuring follow-up (i.e., risky treatment decisions). Key informants noted that lifestyle choices, including the use of alcohol and drugs, can exacerbate these risks. Health care access barriers driven by travel health insurance and mobility limitations further complicate the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections for Canadian international retirement migrants while abroad.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the complex interplay of social behaviours and health care barriers that heighten the risk of sexually transmitted infection transmission among Canadian retirement migrants in the transnational context of Yuma. Extended diagnostic and treatment services, comprehensive sexual health education in pre- and post-travel consultations, as well as inclusive travel health insurance coverage could significantly improve the sexual health outcomes for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057024/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144034217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01DOI: 10.1186/s40794-025-00247-2
Khalid Hajissa, Mutiat Hammed-Akanmu, Hussain Omar Alfaqih, Ahmad A Alshehri, Mohammed Dauda Goni, Maha Al-Asmakh
Background: Mosquito-borne viral (MBV) infections caused by dengue virus (DENV), Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), West Nile virus (WNV), and chikungunya virus (CHIKV) pose a significant global public health concern. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the reported prevalence data for these viruses in Gulf countries.
Methods: A web search in four electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) was conducted, and forty-four eligible studies were fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in this study. The Pooled prevalence of MBVs was estimated using a random-effects model. The heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q test and I2 test, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test.
Results: Using meta-analysis of proportions, the pooled prevalence of MBVs in Gulf countries among 34,367 human and 19,062 Animal samples was estimated to be 22.5% (95% CI: 13.7-31.4) and 11.6% (95% CI: 0.5 - 22.7%), respectively. In human, DENV was the most predominant virus reported in 19 studies, with an overall pooled prevalence of 32.4%, followed by RVFV in 9 studies, with an infection rate of 10.1%, while WNV and CHIKV were only reported in two studies, with overall prevalence rates of 6.4% and 2.4%, respectively. On the other hand, the overall prevalence of WNV and RVFV in animals was estimated to be 27.7% and 1.5%, respectively.
Conclusion: This review revealed that MBVs are highly prevalent among humans in Gulf countries but relatively low in animals. As a result, additional therapeutic and preventive measures are required. However, the study highlights the need for further studies and surveillance to precisely monitor the burden of these viruses in the region.
{"title":"Current epidemiological status of mosquito-borne arboviruses in Gulf countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Khalid Hajissa, Mutiat Hammed-Akanmu, Hussain Omar Alfaqih, Ahmad A Alshehri, Mohammed Dauda Goni, Maha Al-Asmakh","doi":"10.1186/s40794-025-00247-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-025-00247-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mosquito-borne viral (MBV) infections caused by dengue virus (DENV), Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), West Nile virus (WNV), and chikungunya virus (CHIKV) pose a significant global public health concern. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the reported prevalence data for these viruses in Gulf countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web search in four electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) was conducted, and forty-four eligible studies were fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in this study. The Pooled prevalence of MBVs was estimated using a random-effects model. The heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q test and I<sup>2</sup> test, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using meta-analysis of proportions, the pooled prevalence of MBVs in Gulf countries among 34,367 human and 19,062 Animal samples was estimated to be 22.5% (95% CI: 13.7-31.4) and 11.6% (95% CI: 0.5 - 22.7%), respectively. In human, DENV was the most predominant virus reported in 19 studies, with an overall pooled prevalence of 32.4%, followed by RVFV in 9 studies, with an infection rate of 10.1%, while WNV and CHIKV were only reported in two studies, with overall prevalence rates of 6.4% and 2.4%, respectively. On the other hand, the overall prevalence of WNV and RVFV in animals was estimated to be 27.7% and 1.5%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review revealed that MBVs are highly prevalent among humans in Gulf countries but relatively low in animals. As a result, additional therapeutic and preventive measures are required. However, the study highlights the need for further studies and surveillance to precisely monitor the burden of these viruses in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044787/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144043654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-30DOI: 10.1186/s40794-024-00244-x
Achim Burrer, Tobias R Spiller, Jose Marie Koussemou, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Philipp Homan, Steffi Weidt, Erich Seifritz, Stefan Vetter, Stephan T Egger
Background: Travel-related psychiatric disorders range from anxiety disorders to mood disorders, substance abuse, and psychosis. Various travel-associated factors such as dehydration, time shifts, changes in social structures or stress factors are discussed for these disorders. There is a lack of knowledge concerning the quality and outcome of psychiatric treatment in travelers hospitalized abroad. This study is the first to compare outcome of treatment in psychiatric travelers to domestic patients.
Methods: We analyzed electronic health records of travelers in the Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich from January 2013 to December 2020. Each traveler was matched with one Swiss national and one migrant using propensity score matching.
Results: Travelers showed inferior CGI-I scores at discharge (F(2,969) = 5.72; p = 0.003). The length of stay was shorter (F(2,969) = 38.74:p < 0.001) for travelers (9.69 ± 14.31) than for Swiss nationals (24.69 ± 29.42) and migrants (24.74 ± 28.62). The transfer rate to another hospital was higher (X2(2,972) = 50.85: p < 0.001) for travelers (79, 29.4%) than for Swiss nationals (25, 7.7%) or migrants (26, 8.0%).
Conclusions: Psychiatric treatments of hospitalized travelers showed a lower symptom improvement while presenting a more severe overall condition at discharge. Length of stay was shorter compared to domestic patients. Admission of travelers was initiated involuntarily more frequently. This most closely reflects the theory that travelers are typically hospitalized in severe emergencies and are promptly discharged or repatriated after an initial treatment response has been achieved.
{"title":"Psychiatric treatment outcomes of travelers admitted to a psychiatric hospital: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Achim Burrer, Tobias R Spiller, Jose Marie Koussemou, Georgios Schoretsanitis, Philipp Homan, Steffi Weidt, Erich Seifritz, Stefan Vetter, Stephan T Egger","doi":"10.1186/s40794-024-00244-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-024-00244-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Travel-related psychiatric disorders range from anxiety disorders to mood disorders, substance abuse, and psychosis. Various travel-associated factors such as dehydration, time shifts, changes in social structures or stress factors are discussed for these disorders. There is a lack of knowledge concerning the quality and outcome of psychiatric treatment in travelers hospitalized abroad. This study is the first to compare outcome of treatment in psychiatric travelers to domestic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed electronic health records of travelers in the Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich from January 2013 to December 2020. Each traveler was matched with one Swiss national and one migrant using propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Travelers showed inferior CGI-I scores at discharge (F(2,969) = 5.72; p = 0.003). The length of stay was shorter (F(2,969) = 38.74:p < 0.001) for travelers (9.69 ± 14.31) than for Swiss nationals (24.69 ± 29.42) and migrants (24.74 ± 28.62). The transfer rate to another hospital was higher (X<sup>2</sup>(2,972) = 50.85: p < 0.001) for travelers (79, 29.4%) than for Swiss nationals (25, 7.7%) or migrants (26, 8.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychiatric treatments of hospitalized travelers showed a lower symptom improvement while presenting a more severe overall condition at discharge. Length of stay was shorter compared to domestic patients. Admission of travelers was initiated involuntarily more frequently. This most closely reflects the theory that travelers are typically hospitalized in severe emergencies and are promptly discharged or repatriated after an initial treatment response has been achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143996936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Thailand, a major tourist destination, exhibits variations in sanitation and food safety practices that can lead to cases of travelers' diarrhea (TD) caused by a plethora of pathogens. This systematic review synthesizes data on the pathogens associated with TD in Thailand, providing valuable insights into pathogen diversity and distribution, traveler profiles, and geographical regions of concern.
Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022346014). A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Journals@Ovid databases. The search included terms related to "diarrhea," "travelers," and "Thailand," without restrictions on publication date. Eligible studies focused on travelers to Thailand who developed diarrhea with identified specific pathogens. Data was extracted and synthesized using a narrative approach. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist.
Results: A total of 15 studies met the eligibility criteria, identifying that pathogens related to TD in Thailand were bacteria, particularly enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) (80%), followed by Campylobacter jejuni (33.3%) and Salmonella spp. (40%). Viral pathogens such as rotavirus and norovirus were also notable, with Giardia spp. being the most identified parasite. Pathogen distribution varied across different regions of Thailand, with tourism hubs such as Bangkok, Chiang Mai, Phuket, and Krabi reporting a broader range of infections.
Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the diverse range of pathogens associated with TD in Thailand, with bacterial pathogens, specifically ETEC, being the predominant cause in most studies. The findings underscore the importance of preventive measures, such as improved hygiene practices and food safety awareness, especially in high-risk tourist areas. Further research is needed to understand better the risk factors contributing to TD and to develop targeted interventions for prevention.
{"title":"Evidence of pathogens associated with travelers' diarrhea in Thailand: a systematic review.","authors":"Wanida Mala, Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui, Frederick Ramirez Masangkay, Kinley Wangdi, Polrat Wilairatana, Manas Kotepui","doi":"10.1186/s40794-024-00243-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-024-00243-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thailand, a major tourist destination, exhibits variations in sanitation and food safety practices that can lead to cases of travelers' diarrhea (TD) caused by a plethora of pathogens. This systematic review synthesizes data on the pathogens associated with TD in Thailand, providing valuable insights into pathogen diversity and distribution, traveler profiles, and geographical regions of concern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022346014). A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Journals@Ovid databases. The search included terms related to \"diarrhea,\" \"travelers,\" and \"Thailand,\" without restrictions on publication date. Eligible studies focused on travelers to Thailand who developed diarrhea with identified specific pathogens. Data was extracted and synthesized using a narrative approach. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies met the eligibility criteria, identifying that pathogens related to TD in Thailand were bacteria, particularly enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) (80%), followed by Campylobacter jejuni (33.3%) and Salmonella spp. (40%). Viral pathogens such as rotavirus and norovirus were also notable, with Giardia spp. being the most identified parasite. Pathogen distribution varied across different regions of Thailand, with tourism hubs such as Bangkok, Chiang Mai, Phuket, and Krabi reporting a broader range of infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review highlights the diverse range of pathogens associated with TD in Thailand, with bacterial pathogens, specifically ETEC, being the predominant cause in most studies. The findings underscore the importance of preventive measures, such as improved hygiene practices and food safety awareness, especially in high-risk tourist areas. Further research is needed to understand better the risk factors contributing to TD and to develop targeted interventions for prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036122/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144049998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-15DOI: 10.1186/s40794-024-00240-1
Harry César Kayembe, Germain Kapour, Papy Ansobi, Aymen Jarboui, Alexis Kalimba Bantu, Glodi Elumbu, Nicodème Nkutu, Eric Mbuyi, Abraham Moyo, Vincent Mbatu, Archilène Nto, Marc Ngondu, Benito Muhindo, Serge Lukunku, Orman Mboyolo, Traoré Ibrahima Sory, Didier Bompangue
Background: Vaccination against COVID-19 has been the primary public health measure implemented to limit the spread of the disease. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement in vaccine coverage, particularly in sub-Saharan African countries. The factors influencing the acceptance or reluctance of the COVID-19 vaccine have been widely studied, but there is a gap in the literature with regard to dynamic populations, particularly travelers, who are one of the priority target groups for vaccination. This study assessed the perceptions, attitudes and practices regarding the COVID-19 vaccine, and explored factors associated with vaccination status among travelers.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at several points of entry (PoEs) selected for six survey sites (N'djili airport, Ngobila beach, Lufu, Boma, Moanda, and Kananga), located in three provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Kinshasa, Kongo Central and Kasaï Central), from February 20 to March 05, 2023. The data were summarized and logistic regression models were performed to assess factors associated with vaccination status.
Results: A total of 2742 travelers were included in this survey. Of these, 54% had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that that several factors were significantly associated with vaccination status. These included age (under 60 years), marital status (single), occupation (other than healthcare worker), mode of travel (other than airplane), and poor perceptions of the vaccine. The most frequently cited reasons for vaccination among respondents who had received the vaccine were the prevention of COVID-19 infection and the ease of travel. In contrast, unvaccinated participants expressed greater concern about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, as well as vaccine-related side effects. Furthermore, travel disruption and inappropriate vaccination sites have been identified as significant obstacles to the acceptance of vaccination at the PoEs.
Conclusions: It is essential that awareness initiatives address concerns and misconceptions about vaccine safety and effectiveness. The influence of social media platforms may be harnessed for the dissemination of accurate information from the most trusted information sources, including healthcare professionals, to the target population. In addition, accompanying measures should be considered to facilitate vaccination compliance at different PoEs.
{"title":"Perceptions, attitudes, practices, and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination among travelers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.","authors":"Harry César Kayembe, Germain Kapour, Papy Ansobi, Aymen Jarboui, Alexis Kalimba Bantu, Glodi Elumbu, Nicodème Nkutu, Eric Mbuyi, Abraham Moyo, Vincent Mbatu, Archilène Nto, Marc Ngondu, Benito Muhindo, Serge Lukunku, Orman Mboyolo, Traoré Ibrahima Sory, Didier Bompangue","doi":"10.1186/s40794-024-00240-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-024-00240-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccination against COVID-19 has been the primary public health measure implemented to limit the spread of the disease. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement in vaccine coverage, particularly in sub-Saharan African countries. The factors influencing the acceptance or reluctance of the COVID-19 vaccine have been widely studied, but there is a gap in the literature with regard to dynamic populations, particularly travelers, who are one of the priority target groups for vaccination. This study assessed the perceptions, attitudes and practices regarding the COVID-19 vaccine, and explored factors associated with vaccination status among travelers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted at several points of entry (PoEs) selected for six survey sites (N'djili airport, Ngobila beach, Lufu, Boma, Moanda, and Kananga), located in three provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Kinshasa, Kongo Central and Kasaï Central), from February 20 to March 05, 2023. The data were summarized and logistic regression models were performed to assess factors associated with vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2742 travelers were included in this survey. Of these, 54% had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that that several factors were significantly associated with vaccination status. These included age (under 60 years), marital status (single), occupation (other than healthcare worker), mode of travel (other than airplane), and poor perceptions of the vaccine. The most frequently cited reasons for vaccination among respondents who had received the vaccine were the prevention of COVID-19 infection and the ease of travel. In contrast, unvaccinated participants expressed greater concern about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, as well as vaccine-related side effects. Furthermore, travel disruption and inappropriate vaccination sites have been identified as significant obstacles to the acceptance of vaccination at the PoEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is essential that awareness initiatives address concerns and misconceptions about vaccine safety and effectiveness. The influence of social media platforms may be harnessed for the dissemination of accurate information from the most trusted information sources, including healthcare professionals, to the target population. In addition, accompanying measures should be considered to facilitate vaccination compliance at different PoEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998446/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144000408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}