Transplant Infectious Disease最新文献

The Middle East presents a complex landscape for organ transplantation, marked by diversity yet hindered by challenges. Countries such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Iran have made significant advancements, particularly in living donor kidney transplants. The editorial aims to critically evaluate the current state of organ transplantation in the Middle East, focusing on the progress made by key countries like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Iran, while also addressing the ongoing challenges that hinder comprehensive organ donation systems. It seeks to highlight the necessity for a unified approach that includes coordinated policy implementation, enhanced data-sharing mechanisms, increased public awareness, and sustainable funding. Ultimately, the editorial advocates for the establishment of a digital platform to streamline organ transplant procedures and promote equitable healthcare across the region.

Background: Expected and unexpected donor-derived infections (DDI) are a rare event in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients but are potentially associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To assure the microbial safety of transplantation, both national guidelines and the current, regional, and local epidemiology of infectious diseases must be considered.

Methods: In the present paper the strategies adopted by the Italian National Center for Transplantation (CNT) since 2003 and their evolution to guarantee the safety of organ transplantation are reported. Starting in 2012 mandatory reporting to the CNT of all adverse reactions was started. The number and type of DDI reported to the CNT are currently being analyzed.

Results: The infectious diseases second opinion has written and updated the guidelines on the safety of organs for transplantation and supported the Italian transplant network for the use of organs from donors with suspected or documented potentially transmissible infections.

Conclusion: A transplant safety network was developed in Italy in 2003 and has been updated according to the evolving knowledge and the changing epidemiology. This is an evolving field, and a continuous update of the recommendation is needed.

The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network focuses on issues related to the transmission of disease through organ transplantation. Providing a review of potential cases of transmission, translating aggregate data into actionable education and guidance for the transplant community, and providing input for policy development, DTAC aims to improve the safety of organ transplantation through a reduction in donor-derived transmission events. Through its nearly 20-year history, DTAC has provided education, guidance, and policy, addressed numerous emerging infections, and continuously focused on the community's understanding of risk assessment related to donor-derived transmission. By updating the DTAC mission to both decrease transmission and safely expand the donor pool with additional guidance to safely use organs previously not considered for transplantation due to transmission concerns, the Committee's role will remain critical.

This paper is an educationally focused article discussing how transplant infectious diseases (TID) providers balance the risks of accepting or rejecting an organ and have pushed barriers in organ transplantation. We emphasize the role TID providers play in the transplantation process as critical players on the transplant team. We discuss various donor-derived infections that were previously deemed unacceptable for donation due to concerns for transmission. Advances in medical knowledge have changed some of these situations. We discuss the critical role TID providers have in closing the gap between the thousands of patients on organ waitlists and the organ deficit faced each day. We believe TID providers have a unique opportunity to expand the donor pool by increasing education, expanding acceptable organ definitions, and expanding the boundaries of what we can do with potentially transmissible infections in organ transplantation.

Donor-derived infection is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Accurate and timely identification of unexpected infectious disease transmission events has implications not only for the recipient(s) experiencing infection, but also other recipients of organs or tissues from the same donor who may require additional testing or risk mitigation, as well as the broader organ transplant regulatory framework. This narrative review synthesizes data from published reports of symptomatic unexpected donor-derived infections in SOT recipients to provide clinicians with a systematic approach to the evaluation of undifferentiated illnesses that may be of donor origin. Key reasons to consider donor-derived infection include certain microbiologically proven infections in the recipient, especially early after transplant, characteristics of the donor or their management that suggest potential exposure to or infection with specific pathogens prior to organ procurement, and select clinical syndromes that occur in the post-transplant period. Syndromes for which expedited consideration and evaluation of donor-derived infection may be warranted include central nervous system infection, graft or perigraft complications developing in the absence of typical risk factors, and unexplained critical illness/sepsis syndrome in the early post-transplant period. When embarking on an investigation of a suspected donor-derived infection, clinicians should apply knowledge of the entire continuum of the organ procurement and transplant process to ensure unbiased and comprehensive data collection that will facilitate appropriate adjudication of these uncommon but high-consequence events.

It is impossible to eliminate the potential for transmission of donor-derived infections (DDI) when using medical products of human origin (MPHO). However, a thoughtful and systematic approach to donor evaluation can mitigate the risk. Prevention is a key issue, and physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion and remain vigilant in evaluating MPHO donors or recipients, as well as stay current on emerging infections. Biovigilance is the systematic monitoring of serious adverse reactions and events (SARE) that ensures the quality and safety of MPHO in transplantation. The Notify Library with its 2808 references is an available didactic tool that could support physicians in donor or recipient evaluation, inform biovigilance activity, and benefit the international scientific community. It provides free access to a large collection of many different types of SARE, identified mainly through the review of published articles and case reports from national or regional surveillance programs. The Notify Library includes many well-documented records of SARE in the field of DDI, representing a useful tool for assessing SARE associated with transplantation. It is continuously updated with new records, especially when a new type of incident is first reported. All types of described incidents may have educational value while guiding detection, investigation, or risk management. Sharing the lessons learned from these incidents represents an important educational opportunity that can help improve organ donation processes and achieve higher standards of quality and safety.

This review describes the risks and benefits of expanding screening for transmissible pathogens in deceased organ donors. The focus is on the experience and procedure in Germany to make a decision on how to proceed with a possible donor. Three issues are of interest in how screening policies impact the process with the aim of mitigating unexpected transmission risks: (1) Should we add universal or targeted nucleic acid testing to serological tests for common blood-borne viruses (BBVs; HIV, HBV, and HCV)? (2) Which tests should be added for screening in a geographically restricted region beyond testing for these BBVs? (3) Being faced with changes (e.g., climate and population) in the own geographically restricted region, what strategies are needed before implementing new tests, and which considerations apply for proper indication to do this? Testing may only be effective when during donor characterization the appropriate conclusions are drawn from the existing findings and screening tests are initiated. This statement overlaps the need to implement universal screening for a pathogen or targeted screening based on the risk that the donor has acquired the transmissible pathogen or is not as possible to identify by current methods of clinical judgment and/or specific tests.

Preservation techniques that maintain the viability of an organ graft between retrieval from the donor and implantation into the recipient remain a critical aspect of solid organ transplantation. While traditionally preservation is accomplished with static cold storage, advances in ex vivo dynamic machine perfusion, both hypothermic and normothermic, have allowed for prolongation of organ viability and recovery of marginal organs effectively increasing the usable donor pool. However, the use of these novel machine perfusion technologies likely exposes the recipient to additional infectious risk either through clonal expansion of pathogens derived during organ recovery or de novo exogenous acquisition of pathogens while the organ remains on the machine perfusion circuit. There is a paucity of high-quality studies that have attempted to quantify infection risk, although it appears that prolonging the time on the machine perfusion circuit and normothermic parameters increases the risk of infection. Conversely, the use of ex vivo machine perfusion unlocks new opportunities to detect and treat donor-derived infections before implantation into the recipient. This review seeks to reveal how the use of ex vivo machine perfusion strategies may augment the risk of infection in the organ recipient as well as outline ways that this technology could be leveraged to enhance our ability to manage donor-derived infections.