首页 > 最新文献

Transplant Infectious Disease最新文献

英文 中文
Sulfonamide allergy label and the risk of opportunistic infections in solid organ transplant recipients - A retrospective matched cohort study. 磺胺过敏标签与实体器官移植受者发生机会性感染的风险--一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14355
Taha Al-Shaikhly, Sarah Al-Obaydi, Timothy J Craig, Maria P Henao

Background: While a penicillin allergy label has been linked to various negative clinical outcomes, limited studies have specifically characterized the implication of sulfonamide allergy labels (SAL) on clinical outcomes. We examined the impact of SAL on clinical outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients.

Methods: In this retrospective matched cohort study, we utilized the TriNetX US collaborative Network, a multicenter de-identified US database, and identified solid organ transplant recipients with and without SAL. The 1-year probability of developing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), toxoplasmosis, and nocardiosis was estimated and contrasted between the two study groups. The hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) quantified the strength and direction of the association between SAL and these outcomes.

Results: When comparing 1571 solid organ transplant recipients with SAL to an equal number of matched controls, patients with SAL had a higher probability of developing nocardiosis (HR 3.85; 95% CI, 1.44-10.30; p = .004; corrected p = .04), and toxoplasmosis (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.10-3.17; p = .019; corrected p = .19), but no difference in the risk of developing PJP (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.68-3.95; p = .27). There was no mortality difference (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.99-1.75; p = .061; corrected p = .6). SAL influenced antibiotic prescription with overutilization of dapsone, atovaquone, and pentamidine and underutilization of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole.

Conclusion: SAL is associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections following solid organ transplantation. Measures to evaluate and de-label sulfonamide allergy prior to transplantation or desensitizing shortly after transplantation are advisable.

背景:虽然青霉素过敏标签与各种不良临床结果有关,但专门描述磺胺过敏标签(SAL)对临床结果影响的研究却很有限。我们研究了磺胺过敏标签对实体器官移植受者临床结果的影响:在这项回顾性匹配队列研究中,我们利用美国多中心去标识化数据库 TriNetX US collaborative Network,确定了有 SAL 和无 SAL 的实体器官移植受者。我们估算了两组受者一年内罹患肺孢子虫肺炎(PJP)、弓形虫病和诺卡氏菌病的概率,并进行了对比。危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)量化了SAL与这些结果之间关联的强度和方向:结果:将 1571 例患有 SAL 的实体器官移植受者与同等数量的匹配对照组进行比较,发现患有 SAL 的患者罹患诺卡氏菌病的概率更高(HR 3.85; 95% CI, 1.44-10.30;p = .004;校正后 p = .04)和弓形虫病(HR,1.87;95% CI,1.10-3.17;p = .019;校正后 p = .19),但患 PJP 的风险没有差异(HR,1.64;95% CI,0.68-3.95;p = .27)。死亡率没有差异(HR,1.31;95% CI,0.99-1.75;p = .061;校正后 p = .6)。SAL对抗生素处方有影响,多用了达帕酮、阿托伐醌和喷他脒,而少用了三甲双胍和磺胺甲噁唑:结论:SAL 与实体器官移植后机会性感染风险增加有关。建议在移植前采取磺胺过敏评估和脱敏措施,或在移植后短期内进行脱敏治疗。
{"title":"Sulfonamide allergy label and the risk of opportunistic infections in solid organ transplant recipients - A retrospective matched cohort study.","authors":"Taha Al-Shaikhly, Sarah Al-Obaydi, Timothy J Craig, Maria P Henao","doi":"10.1111/tid.14355","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While a penicillin allergy label has been linked to various negative clinical outcomes, limited studies have specifically characterized the implication of sulfonamide allergy labels (SAL) on clinical outcomes. We examined the impact of SAL on clinical outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective matched cohort study, we utilized the TriNetX US collaborative Network, a multicenter de-identified US database, and identified solid organ transplant recipients with and without SAL. The 1-year probability of developing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), toxoplasmosis, and nocardiosis was estimated and contrasted between the two study groups. The hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) quantified the strength and direction of the association between SAL and these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing 1571 solid organ transplant recipients with SAL to an equal number of matched controls, patients with SAL had a higher probability of developing nocardiosis (HR 3.85; 95% CI, 1.44-10.30; p = .004; corrected p = .04), and toxoplasmosis (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.10-3.17; p = .019; corrected p = .19), but no difference in the risk of developing PJP (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.68-3.95; p = .27). There was no mortality difference (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.99-1.75; p = .061; corrected p = .6). SAL influenced antibiotic prescription with overutilization of dapsone, atovaquone, and pentamidine and underutilization of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAL is associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections following solid organ transplantation. Measures to evaluate and de-label sulfonamide allergy prior to transplantation or desensitizing shortly after transplantation are advisable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141971852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel intervention based on an individualized bundle of care to decrease infection in kidney transplant recipients. 基于个性化护理包的新型干预措施,减少肾移植受者的感染。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14354
Lucía de Jorge-Huerta, José Tiago Silva, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Isabel Rodríguez-Goncer, M Asunción Pérez-Jacoiste Asín, Tamara Ruiz-Merlo, Carlos Heredia-Mena, Esther González-Monte, Natalia Polanco, Rafael San Juan, Amado Andrés, José María Aguado, Francisco López-Medrano

Background: Infection remains a relevant complication after kidney transplantation (KT). A well-established strategy in modern medicine is the application of bundles of evidence-based practice in clinical settings. The objective of this study is to explore the application of a personalized bundle of measures aimed to reduce the incidence of infection in the first 12 months after KT.

Methods: A single-center prospective cohort of 148 patients undergoing KT between February 2018 and September 2019 that received an individualized infection prevention strategy was compared to a preintervention cohort (n = 159). The bundle comprised a review of the patient's immunization history, infection risk by country of origin, screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), antimicrobial prophylaxis, and immunological assessment. Individualized recommendations were accordingly provided at a scheduled visit at day +30 after transplantation.

Results: The intervention cohort showed a higher compliance rate with the recommended vaccine schedule, screening for geographically restricted infections and LTBI, and intravenous immunoglobulin and vitamin D supplementation (p values <.001). The 1-year incidence rate of infection was lower in the intervention cohort (42.6% vs. 57.9%; p value = .037), as was the rate of infection-related hospitalization (17.6% vs. 32.1%; p value = .003) and the incidence of severe bacterial infection. There were no differences in graft rejection or mortality rates between groups.

Conclusions: A multifaceted intervention, including a bundle of evidence-based practices, enhanced compliance with recommended preventive measures and was correlated with a reduction in the 12-month incidence of infection after KT.

背景:感染仍是肾移植(KT)术后的一个相关并发症。现代医学中一项行之有效的策略是在临床环境中应用循证实践捆绑措施。本研究的目的是探讨如何应用个性化的捆绑措施来降低 KT 术后头 12 个月的感染率:在 2018 年 2 月至 2019 年 9 月期间,148 名接受 KT 的患者接受了个性化感染预防策略,与干预前队列(n = 159)进行了比较。捆绑策略包括审查患者的免疫史、原籍国感染风险、潜伏结核感染(LTBI)筛查、抗菌药物预防和免疫学评估。因此,在移植后第 +30 天的预定访问中提供了个性化建议:结果:干预组群对推荐的疫苗接种计划、地域限制性感染和迟发性肺结核筛查以及静脉注射免疫球蛋白和补充维生素 D 的依从性更高(P 值 结论:干预组群对推荐的疫苗接种计划、地域限制性感染和迟发性肺结核筛查以及静脉注射免疫球蛋白和补充维生素 D 的依从性更高(P 值):包括一系列循证实践在内的多方面干预措施提高了对推荐预防措施的依从性,并与 KT 移植后 12 个月感染发生率的降低相关。
{"title":"Novel intervention based on an individualized bundle of care to decrease infection in kidney transplant recipients.","authors":"Lucía de Jorge-Huerta, José Tiago Silva, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Isabel Rodríguez-Goncer, M Asunción Pérez-Jacoiste Asín, Tamara Ruiz-Merlo, Carlos Heredia-Mena, Esther González-Monte, Natalia Polanco, Rafael San Juan, Amado Andrés, José María Aguado, Francisco López-Medrano","doi":"10.1111/tid.14354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14354","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection remains a relevant complication after kidney transplantation (KT). A well-established strategy in modern medicine is the application of bundles of evidence-based practice in clinical settings. The objective of this study is to explore the application of a personalized bundle of measures aimed to reduce the incidence of infection in the first 12 months after KT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center prospective cohort of 148 patients undergoing KT between February 2018 and September 2019 that received an individualized infection prevention strategy was compared to a preintervention cohort (n = 159). The bundle comprised a review of the patient's immunization history, infection risk by country of origin, screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), antimicrobial prophylaxis, and immunological assessment. Individualized recommendations were accordingly provided at a scheduled visit at day +30 after transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention cohort showed a higher compliance rate with the recommended vaccine schedule, screening for geographically restricted infections and LTBI, and intravenous immunoglobulin and vitamin D supplementation (p values <.001). The 1-year incidence rate of infection was lower in the intervention cohort (42.6% vs. 57.9%; p value = .037), as was the rate of infection-related hospitalization (17.6% vs. 32.1%; p value = .003) and the incidence of severe bacterial infection. There were no differences in graft rejection or mortality rates between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multifaceted intervention, including a bundle of evidence-based practices, enhanced compliance with recommended preventive measures and was correlated with a reduction in the 12-month incidence of infection after KT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141971898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A call to address penicillin allergy labels in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants: How to avoid rash decisions. 呼吁解决造血干细胞移植患者青霉素过敏标签问题:如何避免草率决定。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14350
Ami P Belmont, Cosby A Stone, Autumn C Guyer, E Jennifer Edelman, Jason A Trubiano

Among patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants, infections, particularly multidrug-resistant infections, pose a grave threat. In this setting, penicillin allergy labels are both common and harmful. Though the majority of patients who report penicillin allergy can actually tolerate penicillin, penicillin allergy labels are associated with use of alternative antibiotics, which are often more broad spectrum, less effective, and more toxic. In turn, they are associated with more severe infections, multidrug-resistant infections, Clostridium difficile, and increased mortality. Evaluating penicillin allergy labels can immediately expand access to preferred therapeutic options, which are critical to care in patients with recent hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Point-of-care assessment and clinical decision tools now exist to aid the nonallergist in assessment of penicillin allergy. This can aid in expanding use of other beta-lactam antibiotics and assist in risk-stratifying patients to determine a testing strategy. In patients with low-risk reaction histories, direct oral challenges can be employed to efficiently delabel patients across clinical care settings. We advocate for multidisciplinary efforts to evaluate patients with penicillin allergy labels prior to transplantation.

在造血干细胞移植患者中,感染,尤其是耐多药感染,构成了严重威胁。在这种情况下,青霉素过敏标签既常见又有害。虽然大多数报告青霉素过敏的患者实际上都能耐受青霉素,但青霉素过敏标签与使用替代抗生素有关,而替代抗生素通常更广谱、更无效、毒性更大。反过来,这些抗生素又会导致更严重的感染、耐多药感染、艰难梭菌感染以及死亡率上升。评估青霉素过敏标签可立即扩大首选治疗方案的使用范围,这对近期接受造血干细胞移植的患者的护理至关重要。现在已有护理点评估和临床决策工具,可帮助非过敏学家评估青霉素过敏。这有助于扩大其他β-内酰胺类抗生素的使用范围,并协助对患者进行风险分级,以确定检测策略。对于有低风险反应史的患者,可采用直接口服挑战法在不同的临床护理环境中有效地对患者进行分层。我们提倡多学科合作,在移植前对带有青霉素过敏标签的患者进行评估。
{"title":"A call to address penicillin allergy labels in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants: How to avoid rash decisions.","authors":"Ami P Belmont, Cosby A Stone, Autumn C Guyer, E Jennifer Edelman, Jason A Trubiano","doi":"10.1111/tid.14350","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants, infections, particularly multidrug-resistant infections, pose a grave threat. In this setting, penicillin allergy labels are both common and harmful. Though the majority of patients who report penicillin allergy can actually tolerate penicillin, penicillin allergy labels are associated with use of alternative antibiotics, which are often more broad spectrum, less effective, and more toxic. In turn, they are associated with more severe infections, multidrug-resistant infections, Clostridium difficile, and increased mortality. Evaluating penicillin allergy labels can immediately expand access to preferred therapeutic options, which are critical to care in patients with recent hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Point-of-care assessment and clinical decision tools now exist to aid the nonallergist in assessment of penicillin allergy. This can aid in expanding use of other beta-lactam antibiotics and assist in risk-stratifying patients to determine a testing strategy. In patients with low-risk reaction histories, direct oral challenges can be employed to efficiently delabel patients across clinical care settings. We advocate for multidisciplinary efforts to evaluate patients with penicillin allergy labels prior to transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cytomegalovirus surveillance after antiviral prophylaxis in CMV mismatched transplant patients: Does recurrent cytomegalovirus DNAemia impact patient survival? 巨细胞病毒错配移植患者抗病毒预防后的巨细胞病毒监测:复发性巨细胞病毒 DNA 血症会影响患者生存吗?
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14292
Oscar A Fernández-García, Cristina Hernandez, Mark Robbins, Dima Kabbani, Karen Doucette, Carlos Cervera

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatched, donor IgG-positive/recipient IgG-negative, solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high risk of CMV invasive disease. Post-prophylaxis disease is an issue in this population. Some programs employ surveillance after prophylaxis (SAP) to limit the incidence of post-prophylaxis disease.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study that included all CMV mismatched SOTRs from 2003 to 2017. Patients underwent SAP with weekly CMV plasma viral load for 12 weeks. The subjects were classified into three post-prophylaxis DNAemia patterns: no DNAemia, one episode of DNAemia, and multiple episodes of DNAemia. We calculated the cumulative incidence of each DNAemia pattern. We also determined 5-year mortality based on DNAemia pattern stratified by organ transplant type.

Results: Post-prophylaxis recurrent DNAemia occurred in 63% of lung recipients and 32% of non-lung recipients (p =  .003). Tissue invasive CMV disease was diagnosed in 3% of the population and CMV syndrome was diagnosed in 33%. Recurrent DNAemia was not associated with 5-year mortality.

Conclusion: In this cohort, undergoing SAP tissue invasive disease was uncommon and CMV DNAemia recurrence did not have an impact on long-term mortality.

背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV)不匹配、供体 IgG 阳性/受体 IgG 阴性的实体器官移植受者(SOTRs)患 CMV 传染性疾病的风险很高。预防后疾病是这类人群的一个问题。一些项目采用预防后监测(SAP)来限制预防后疾病的发生率:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2003 年至 2017 年期间所有 CMV 不匹配的 SOTR。患者接受了为期12周的SAP治疗,每周检测一次CMV血浆病毒载量。受试者被分为三种预防后DNA血症模式:无DNA血症、一次DNA血症和多次DNA血症。我们计算了每种 DNA 血症模式的累积发病率。我们还根据器官移植类型的DNA血症模式确定了5年死亡率:结果:63%的肺部受者和32%的非肺部受者在预防后复发DNA血症(p = .003)。3%的受者被诊断为组织侵袭性 CMV 病,33%的受者被诊断为 CMV 综合征。复发性DNA血症与5年死亡率无关:在该队列中,接受SAP治疗的组织浸润性疾病并不常见,CMV DNA血症复发对长期死亡率没有影响。
{"title":"Cytomegalovirus surveillance after antiviral prophylaxis in CMV mismatched transplant patients: Does recurrent cytomegalovirus DNAemia impact patient survival?","authors":"Oscar A Fernández-García, Cristina Hernandez, Mark Robbins, Dima Kabbani, Karen Doucette, Carlos Cervera","doi":"10.1111/tid.14292","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatched, donor IgG-positive/recipient IgG-negative, solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high risk of CMV invasive disease. Post-prophylaxis disease is an issue in this population. Some programs employ surveillance after prophylaxis (SAP) to limit the incidence of post-prophylaxis disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study that included all CMV mismatched SOTRs from 2003 to 2017. Patients underwent SAP with weekly CMV plasma viral load for 12 weeks. The subjects were classified into three post-prophylaxis DNAemia patterns: no DNAemia, one episode of DNAemia, and multiple episodes of DNAemia. We calculated the cumulative incidence of each DNAemia pattern. We also determined 5-year mortality based on DNAemia pattern stratified by organ transplant type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-prophylaxis recurrent DNAemia occurred in 63% of lung recipients and 32% of non-lung recipients (p =  .003). Tissue invasive CMV disease was diagnosed in 3% of the population and CMV syndrome was diagnosed in 33%. Recurrent DNAemia was not associated with 5-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort, undergoing SAP tissue invasive disease was uncommon and CMV DNAemia recurrence did not have an impact on long-term mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140903954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cefiderocol utilization in lung transplant recipients at a single center. 单个中心肺移植受者对头孢羟氨苄的使用情况。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14319
Purnadeo N Persaud, Xhilda Xhemali, Kristen Neuhaus, Marie Budev, Jessica Lum

Background: Multidrug-resistant organisms are increasing and are a significant cause of mortality among lung transplant recipients (LTRs). To assist with this issue, novel pharmacotherapies are being developed. This study describes the utilization of a novel antibiotic, cefiderocol (FDC), in LTRs where limited data exists in the current literature. We primarily assessed the clinical indications, duration of therapy, resistance, and adverse effects.

Methods: Conducted as a single-center retrospective review, this study included adult LTRs who received FDC for at least 24 h. Data, extracted from electronic medical records, encompassed patient demographics, transplant history, antimicrobial dosing, adverse effects, bacterial cultures, and outcomes. The research protocol received institutional review board approval.

Results: FDC exhibited effectiveness against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with 26% 30-day mortality and microbiological clearance observed in nine out of 13 cases. Notably, FDC was used in diverse clinical settings, including for prophylaxis, empiric, and targeted treatment.

Conclusion: Further studies are needed to evaluate optimal clinical indications for FDC use in LTRs.

背景:耐多药生物日益增多,是肺移植受者(LTR)死亡的一个重要原因。为解决这一问题,目前正在开发新型药物疗法。本研究介绍了新型抗生素头孢克洛(FDC)在肺移植受者中的应用情况,目前文献中的数据有限。我们主要评估了临床适应症、疗程、耐药性和不良反应:本研究以单中心回顾性研究的形式进行,纳入了接受 FDC 治疗至少 24 小时的成年 LTR 患者。数据来自电子病历,包括患者人口统计学、移植史、抗菌药物剂量、不良反应、细菌培养和结果。研究方案获得了机构审查委员会的批准:结果:FDC对耐多药性铜绿假单胞菌有效,30天死亡率为26%,13例中有9例观察到微生物清除。值得注意的是,FDC 可用于不同的临床环境,包括预防性治疗、经验性治疗和针对性治疗:结论:需要进一步研究以评估 FDC 用于 LTR 的最佳临床适应症。
{"title":"Cefiderocol utilization in lung transplant recipients at a single center.","authors":"Purnadeo N Persaud, Xhilda Xhemali, Kristen Neuhaus, Marie Budev, Jessica Lum","doi":"10.1111/tid.14319","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14319","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug-resistant organisms are increasing and are a significant cause of mortality among lung transplant recipients (LTRs). To assist with this issue, novel pharmacotherapies are being developed. This study describes the utilization of a novel antibiotic, cefiderocol (FDC), in LTRs where limited data exists in the current literature. We primarily assessed the clinical indications, duration of therapy, resistance, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted as a single-center retrospective review, this study included adult LTRs who received FDC for at least 24 h. Data, extracted from electronic medical records, encompassed patient demographics, transplant history, antimicrobial dosing, adverse effects, bacterial cultures, and outcomes. The research protocol received institutional review board approval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FDC exhibited effectiveness against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with 26% 30-day mortality and microbiological clearance observed in nine out of 13 cases. Notably, FDC was used in diverse clinical settings, including for prophylaxis, empiric, and targeted treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further studies are needed to evaluate optimal clinical indications for FDC use in LTRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141331857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies on outcomes of COVID-19 infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant and chimeric antigen receptor therapy recipients. COVID-19单克隆抗体对造血干细胞移植和嵌合抗原受体疗法受者COVID-19感染结果的影响。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14322
Elizabeth H Hahn, Hong Li, Craig S Sauter, Sherif B Mossad

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) recipients are at higher risk of serious complications of COVID-19 infection than the general population. Though there is evidence that monoclonal antibodies (MCA) against COVID-19 reduce the risk of death and hospitalization in the general population, data regarding their efficacy in HSCT and CAR-T recipients remains scarce.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of HSCT and CAR-T recipients to compare 30-day outcomes between patients who did and did not receive MCA after their first episode of COVID-19 between May 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022. Outcomes were defined as the most severe complication experienced out of the following: 30-day emergency department visit, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and death after COVID-19 infection.

Results: We identified 166 patients comprised of 53.6% allogeneic HSCT, 35.5% autologous HSCT, and 10.8% CAR-T recipients; 107 had received a COVID-19 vaccine >2 weeks prior to testing positive, and 40 were treated with MCA. After adjusting for age, presence of symptoms at the initial positive test, and COVID-19 vaccination status, patients who did not receive MCA were five times more likely to develop complications after COVID-19 infection (adjusted odds ratio 5.0 [95% CI, 1.9-12.8], p = .001).

Conclusion: HSCT and CAR-T recipients who received MCA following COVID-19 infection were far less likely to develop COVID-related complications than those who did not receive MCA, regardless of vaccination status. This underscores the potential benefit of developing novel MCA with efficacy against circulating COVID-19 strains.

背景:造血干细胞移植(HSCT)和嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法(CAR-T)受者出现COVID-19感染严重并发症的风险高于普通人群。尽管有证据表明针对 COVID-19 的单克隆抗体(MCA)可降低普通人群的死亡和住院风险,但有关其在造血干细胞移植和 CAR-T 受者中疗效的数据仍然很少:我们对造血干细胞移植和CAR-T受者进行了回顾性研究,比较了2020年5月1日至2022年12月31日期间首次出现COVID-19后接受和未接受MCA的患者的30天预后。结果定义为下列情况中最严重的并发症:感染 COVID-19 后的 30 天急诊就诊、住院、入住重症监护室和死亡:我们确定了 166 名患者,其中异基因造血干细胞移植患者占 53.6%,自体造血干细胞移植患者占 35.5%,CAR-T 受者占 10.8%;107 人在检测结果呈阳性前 2 周以上接种过 COVID-19 疫苗,40 人接受了 MCA 治疗。在对年龄、首次检测阳性时是否出现症状以及COVID-19疫苗接种情况进行调整后,未接种MCA的患者在感染COVID-19后出现并发症的几率是未接种MCA患者的五倍(调整后的几率比为5.0 [95% CI, 1.9-12.8],P = .001):结论:COVID-19感染后接受MCA的造血干细胞移植和CAR-T受者发生COVID相关并发症的几率远远低于未接受MCA的受者,与疫苗接种情况无关。这凸显了开发具有抗循环COVID-19菌株疗效的新型MCA的潜在益处。
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies on outcomes of COVID-19 infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant and chimeric antigen receptor therapy recipients.","authors":"Elizabeth H Hahn, Hong Li, Craig S Sauter, Sherif B Mossad","doi":"10.1111/tid.14322","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14322","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) recipients are at higher risk of serious complications of COVID-19 infection than the general population. Though there is evidence that monoclonal antibodies (MCA) against COVID-19 reduce the risk of death and hospitalization in the general population, data regarding their efficacy in HSCT and CAR-T recipients remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of HSCT and CAR-T recipients to compare 30-day outcomes between patients who did and did not receive MCA after their first episode of COVID-19 between May 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022. Outcomes were defined as the most severe complication experienced out of the following: 30-day emergency department visit, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and death after COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 166 patients comprised of 53.6% allogeneic HSCT, 35.5% autologous HSCT, and 10.8% CAR-T recipients; 107 had received a COVID-19 vaccine >2 weeks prior to testing positive, and 40 were treated with MCA. After adjusting for age, presence of symptoms at the initial positive test, and COVID-19 vaccination status, patients who did not receive MCA were five times more likely to develop complications after COVID-19 infection (adjusted odds ratio 5.0 [95% CI, 1.9-12.8], p = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HSCT and CAR-T recipients who received MCA following COVID-19 infection were far less likely to develop COVID-related complications than those who did not receive MCA, regardless of vaccination status. This underscores the potential benefit of developing novel MCA with efficacy against circulating COVID-19 strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Induction immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with HIV: To deplete or not to deplete? 艾滋病毒肾移植受者的诱导免疫抑制:消耗还是不消耗?
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14299
Akansha Agrawal, Valentina Stosor
{"title":"Induction immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with HIV: To deplete or not to deplete?","authors":"Akansha Agrawal, Valentina Stosor","doi":"10.1111/tid.14299","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14299","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141493576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anal dysplasia and anal cancer in liver transplant recipients: An urgent call for action for anal cancer screening and further research. 肝移植受者的肛门发育不良和肛门癌:关于肛门癌筛查和进一步研究的紧急呼吁。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14306
Helen Cristina Stankiewicz Karita, Cristina Elena Brickman, Peter Chin-Hong
{"title":"Anal dysplasia and anal cancer in liver transplant recipients: An urgent call for action for anal cancer screening and further research.","authors":"Helen Cristina Stankiewicz Karita, Cristina Elena Brickman, Peter Chin-Hong","doi":"10.1111/tid.14306","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14306","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Yield of repeat blood cultures in acute myeloid leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia and bacteremia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. 同种异体造血干细胞移植后发热性中性粒细胞减少症和菌血症的急性髓性白血病患者重复血液培养的结果。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14345
Michael Sheu, Sofia Molina Garcia, Gautam Shrivastava, Meera Patel, Ali Mushtaq, Thomas Crilley, Faiz Anwer, Aneela Majeed

Introduction: This study explored the efficacy of repeat blood cultures in bacteremic acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods: This was a retrospective study of AML patients who experienced febrile neutropenia (FN) and bacteremia following HSCT at the Taussig Cancer Center from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of positive repeat blood cultures following initial positive blood culture.

Results: Fifty patients were included in the study. There were 50 occurrences of FN with positive initial blood cultures that were diagnosed following HSCT. Fifty initial sets of blood cultures and 96 sets of repeat blood cultures were drawn between the 50 occurrences of FN. Twelve of 96 (12.5%) repeat blood culture sets were positive for a pathogen, which occurred over nine of 50 (18.0%) episodes of FN. Three of 96 (3.2%) repeat blood culture sets grew a pathogen that differed from the pathogen that grew in the preceding positive blood culture.

Conclusion: Among bacteremic AML patients in the post-HSCT period, the yield of repeat blood cultures for detecting previously detected and new pathogens was low.

简介:本研究探讨了异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后菌血症急性髓性白血病(AML)患者重复血液培养的疗效:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2019年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在陶西格癌症中心接受造血干细胞移植后出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)和菌血症的AML患者。主要终点是初次血培养阳性后重复血培养阳性率:研究共纳入 50 名患者。造血干细胞移植后确诊初次血培养阳性的 FN 有 50 例。在这 50 例 FN 患者之间,共进行了 50 次初始血培养和 96 次重复血培养。在 96 套重复血培养中,有 12 套(12.5%)的病原体呈阳性,这发生在 50 次 FN 中的 9 次(18.0%)。在96套重复血培养中,有3套(3.2%)培养出的病原体与前一次阳性血培养中培养出的病原体不同:结论:在接受造血干细胞移植后的急性髓细胞性白血病患者中,重复血培养检测以前检测出的病原体和新病原体的成功率很低。
{"title":"Yield of repeat blood cultures in acute myeloid leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia and bacteremia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.","authors":"Michael Sheu, Sofia Molina Garcia, Gautam Shrivastava, Meera Patel, Ali Mushtaq, Thomas Crilley, Faiz Anwer, Aneela Majeed","doi":"10.1111/tid.14345","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14345","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of repeat blood cultures in bacteremic acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of AML patients who experienced febrile neutropenia (FN) and bacteremia following HSCT at the Taussig Cancer Center from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of positive repeat blood cultures following initial positive blood culture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were included in the study. There were 50 occurrences of FN with positive initial blood cultures that were diagnosed following HSCT. Fifty initial sets of blood cultures and 96 sets of repeat blood cultures were drawn between the 50 occurrences of FN. Twelve of 96 (12.5%) repeat blood culture sets were positive for a pathogen, which occurred over nine of 50 (18.0%) episodes of FN. Three of 96 (3.2%) repeat blood culture sets grew a pathogen that differed from the pathogen that grew in the preceding positive blood culture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among bacteremic AML patients in the post-HSCT period, the yield of repeat blood cultures for detecting previously detected and new pathogens was low.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changing the culture of blood cultures: Opportunities for diagnostic stewardship in febrile neutropenia. 改变血培养文化:发热性中性粒细胞减少症的诊断管理机遇。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14346
Emily A Rosen, Erica J Stohs
{"title":"Changing the culture of blood cultures: Opportunities for diagnostic stewardship in febrile neutropenia.","authors":"Emily A Rosen, Erica J Stohs","doi":"10.1111/tid.14346","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tid.14346","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403720/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1