Identifying the parathyroids is compulsory for success of parathyroidectomy for parathyroid adenoma. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of PTeye™ and FLUOBEAM® LX in identifying parathyroid adenomas. Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy due to a parathyroid adenoma were enrolled prospectively in this study and were randomly included to Group A (PTeye™) or Group B (FLUOBEAM® LX). After intraoperative identification of parathyroid adenomas and before tissue dissection (minute 0), we evaluated the efficacy of both devices in confirming the adenomas. We re-evaluated devices' efficacy in minutes 1, 3 and 5 during tissue dissection and before adenoma excision. All PAs were confirmed and identified with PTeye™, while FLUOBEAM® LX could not identify 3/20 adenomas (15%). PTeye™ confirmed parathyroid tissue in less than 1 min in 13 cases (65%), in < 3 min in 7 (35%), whereas FLUOBEAM® LX identified 4 adenomas in < 3 min (20%), in < 5 min 9 adenomas (60%) and > 5 min in 4 (20%). PTeye™ and FLUOBEAM® LX are both useful tools in confirming parathyroid tissue intraoperatively. PTeye™ confirmed the suspected adenoma earlier before tissue dissection, while FLUOBEAM® LX demands tissue dissection as it identifies the normal parathyroid tissue.
{"title":"Assessment of PTeye™ versus FLUOBEAM® LX for parathyroid adenomas: a pilot case-control study.","authors":"Theodosios Papavramidis, Angeliki Chorti, Sohail Bakkar","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02334-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02334-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying the parathyroids is compulsory for success of parathyroidectomy for parathyroid adenoma. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of PTeye™ and FLUOBEAM® LX in identifying parathyroid adenomas. Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy due to a parathyroid adenoma were enrolled prospectively in this study and were randomly included to Group A (PTeye™) or Group B (FLUOBEAM® LX). After intraoperative identification of parathyroid adenomas and before tissue dissection (minute 0), we evaluated the efficacy of both devices in confirming the adenomas. We re-evaluated devices' efficacy in minutes 1, 3 and 5 during tissue dissection and before adenoma excision. All PAs were confirmed and identified with PTeye™, while FLUOBEAM® LX could not identify 3/20 adenomas (15%). PTeye™ confirmed parathyroid tissue in less than 1 min in 13 cases (65%), in < 3 min in 7 (35%), whereas FLUOBEAM® LX identified 4 adenomas in < 3 min (20%), in < 5 min 9 adenomas (60%) and > 5 min in 4 (20%). PTeye™ and FLUOBEAM® LX are both useful tools in confirming parathyroid tissue intraoperatively. PTeye™ confirmed the suspected adenoma earlier before tissue dissection, while FLUOBEAM® LX demands tissue dissection as it identifies the normal parathyroid tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2555-2558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12630192/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144745136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robotic surgery has significantly advanced over the last decade, proving to be a safe and feasible technique in minimally invasive surgery. The latest innovation in robotic-assisted surgery is the da Vinci single-port (SP®) by Intuitive, designed for greater precision and ergonomic efficiency. This report is supposed to be the first Spanish case of robot-assisted cholecystectomy performed using the da Vinci SP® system, detailing system specifications, docking configurations, and surgical outcomes. The procedure was completed without complications or technical failures, with an operative time of 38 min and a docking time of 10 min. The patient was discharged the following day, demonstrating the system's efficacy in routine cholecystectomy procedures.
{"title":"Robot‑assisted cholecystectomy with the new da Vinci SP<sup>®</sup> surgical system: first report in Spain with video.","authors":"Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Valentina Ferri, Riccardo Caruso","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02275-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02275-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic surgery has significantly advanced over the last decade, proving to be a safe and feasible technique in minimally invasive surgery. The latest innovation in robotic-assisted surgery is the da Vinci single-port (SP<sup>®</sup>) by Intuitive, designed for greater precision and ergonomic efficiency. This report is supposed to be the first Spanish case of robot-assisted cholecystectomy performed using the da Vinci SP<sup>®</sup> system, detailing system specifications, docking configurations, and surgical outcomes. The procedure was completed without complications or technical failures, with an operative time of 38 min and a docking time of 10 min. The patient was discharged the following day, demonstrating the system's efficacy in routine cholecystectomy procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2191-2194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144620744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-28DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02367-y
Rossella Melcarne, Chiara Eberspacher, Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Pietro Quaglino, Rebecca Senetta, Arcangelo Picciariello, Leonardo Vincenti, Daniela Rega, Paolo Delrio, Corrado Caracò, Mariarosaria Portinaio, Stefano Arcieri, Giovanni Paolino, Santo Raffaele Mercuri, Carmen Cantisani, Chiara Scorziello, Tal Deborah Engel, Laura Giacomelli, Marco Biffoni, Domenico Mascagni
Background: Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy, often misdiagnosed due to its clinical resemblance to benign anorectal conditions. Early diagnosis remains challenging, with a poor prognosis and high rates of metastasis at presentation.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 21 patients diagnosed with AM between 2013 and 2023 across four high-volume Italian surgical centers. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether AM was suspected at initial evaluation (Group A) or incidentally diagnosed after surgery for presumed benign disease (Group B). Clinical, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data were analyzed.
Results: Only 24% of patients had AM suspected at first presentation. These patients were younger (median age 49 vs. 70 years) and had larger, more readily identifiable tumors. However, nodal and distant metastases were equally frequent in both groups (lymph node metastases: 52.4%; distant metastases: 19%). Most patients underwent wide local excision (71.4%), while only one required abdominoperineal resection. Postoperative recurrence occurred in 47.6% of cases. Median survival was 11 months in Group A and 24 months in Group B. In 90.5% of cases, previous specialist consultations had failed to achieve timely diagnosis, highlighting missed diagnostic opportunities.
Conclusions: AM is frequently overlooked due to its rarity and non-specific presentation. Earlier recognition alone may not improve outcomes, but systematic histopathological assessment, targeted biopsy, and multidisciplinary management remain essential. Conservative surgery with early use of systemic therapy should be prioritized when feasible.
{"title":"Consider the unexpected! An overlooked, elusive, rare but dramatic diagnosis: anorectal melanoma.","authors":"Rossella Melcarne, Chiara Eberspacher, Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Pietro Quaglino, Rebecca Senetta, Arcangelo Picciariello, Leonardo Vincenti, Daniela Rega, Paolo Delrio, Corrado Caracò, Mariarosaria Portinaio, Stefano Arcieri, Giovanni Paolino, Santo Raffaele Mercuri, Carmen Cantisani, Chiara Scorziello, Tal Deborah Engel, Laura Giacomelli, Marco Biffoni, Domenico Mascagni","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02367-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02367-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy, often misdiagnosed due to its clinical resemblance to benign anorectal conditions. Early diagnosis remains challenging, with a poor prognosis and high rates of metastasis at presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 21 patients diagnosed with AM between 2013 and 2023 across four high-volume Italian surgical centers. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether AM was suspected at initial evaluation (Group A) or incidentally diagnosed after surgery for presumed benign disease (Group B). Clinical, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 24% of patients had AM suspected at first presentation. These patients were younger (median age 49 vs. 70 years) and had larger, more readily identifiable tumors. However, nodal and distant metastases were equally frequent in both groups (lymph node metastases: 52.4%; distant metastases: 19%). Most patients underwent wide local excision (71.4%), while only one required abdominoperineal resection. Postoperative recurrence occurred in 47.6% of cases. Median survival was 11 months in Group A and 24 months in Group B. In 90.5% of cases, previous specialist consultations had failed to achieve timely diagnosis, highlighting missed diagnostic opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AM is frequently overlooked due to its rarity and non-specific presentation. Earlier recognition alone may not improve outcomes, but systematic histopathological assessment, targeted biopsy, and multidisciplinary management remain essential. Conservative surgery with early use of systemic therapy should be prioritized when feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2375-2384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12630238/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144970423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-03-23DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02156-7
O H Elbanna, A Salah Eldine, A M Sayed, A K Mousa
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to be beneficial for improving the wound healing process and reducing flap complications. However, the ideal NPWT settings, especially the pressure levels and application modes, are still debatable. This study examines the efficacy and safety of NPWT at different pressure gradients, namely, high (HNPWT) and low (LNPWT), to determine the optimal conditions for improving flap outcomes and minimizing complications. Over a 30-month period, 65 patients who underwent flap reconstruction were randomly assigned to three groups: HNPWT (75-125 mmHg, continuous mode), LNPWT (50-75 mmHg, intermittent mode), and conventional wound dressing (CWD). Patients were evaluated prospectively for post-operative complications, flap viability, infection, edema, and wound dehiscence. Complications were more common in the CWD group than in the HNPWT group, while the HNPWT group had the highest incidence of flap ischemia (41%). NPWT significantly reduced post-operative edema (P = 0.003) and lower infection and dehiscence rates than the CWD group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.029, respectively). Compared with HNPWT, LNPWT showed superior safety and efficacy, with fewer ischemic events, lower pain scores, faster wound healing times, and better esthetic and function outcomes. Although NPWT offers benefits over conventional wound dressing in flap reconstructions, pressure settings should be carefully adjusted. LNPWT is safer and has more satisfactory outcomes than HNPWT, with reduced ischemia and better overall healing. These findings suggest that LNPWT in the intermittent mode is most favorable for improving flap viability and minimizing adverse effects.Registration identification number NCT06080958- July 22, 2024. "Retrospectively registered" URL for the registry: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of different negative-pressure wound therapy gradients on flaps outcomes.","authors":"O H Elbanna, A Salah Eldine, A M Sayed, A K Mousa","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02156-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02156-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to be beneficial for improving the wound healing process and reducing flap complications. However, the ideal NPWT settings, especially the pressure levels and application modes, are still debatable. This study examines the efficacy and safety of NPWT at different pressure gradients, namely, high (HNPWT) and low (LNPWT), to determine the optimal conditions for improving flap outcomes and minimizing complications. Over a 30-month period, 65 patients who underwent flap reconstruction were randomly assigned to three groups: HNPWT (75-125 mmHg, continuous mode), LNPWT (50-75 mmHg, intermittent mode), and conventional wound dressing (CWD). Patients were evaluated prospectively for post-operative complications, flap viability, infection, edema, and wound dehiscence. Complications were more common in the CWD group than in the HNPWT group, while the HNPWT group had the highest incidence of flap ischemia (41%). NPWT significantly reduced post-operative edema (P = 0.003) and lower infection and dehiscence rates than the CWD group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.029, respectively). Compared with HNPWT, LNPWT showed superior safety and efficacy, with fewer ischemic events, lower pain scores, faster wound healing times, and better esthetic and function outcomes. Although NPWT offers benefits over conventional wound dressing in flap reconstructions, pressure settings should be carefully adjusted. LNPWT is safer and has more satisfactory outcomes than HNPWT, with reduced ischemia and better overall healing. These findings suggest that LNPWT in the intermittent mode is most favorable for improving flap viability and minimizing adverse effects.Registration identification number NCT06080958- July 22, 2024. \"Retrospectively registered\" URL for the registry: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2643-2651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12630174/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143692997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-24DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02216-y
Max Schneider, Agata Dukaczewska, Dirk-Jan van Beek, Klaas Van Den Heede, Gunjan Sharma, Martin Almquist
Since 2004, the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) has hosted biennial congresses as a platform for presenting key research. However, the publication rate of abstracts presented at these congresses is unknown. We searched for full publications using titles and authors of abstracts presented orally or as posters at ESES congresses from 2004 to 2018. Abstract factors, such as type of study and number of patients, were investigated in relation to publication rate, journal impact factor, and citation rates of published studies. Out of 733 abstracts presented at ESES during this period, 207 (28%) were presented orally and 528 (72%) as a poster, Overall, 456 of the abstracts (62%) were published, with a median time of 11.4 months from the ESES congress to publication [range - 64.5 to 156]. The median number of citations per published abstract was 21 [range 0-821], the average annual citation rate was 2.3 [0-54], and the median journal impact factor was 2.2 [0-21.3]. The median number of patients included per study was small, accounting for 71.5 [range 1-22,580]. While factors predicting higher chances for publication were oral format (OR 5), 2006 and 2008 ESES congresses (OR 21 and 12.6, respectively), larger sample sizes, oral presentation format, native English authorship, and randomized trials had higher annual citation rates. While the publication rates of ESES congress abstracts are high, collaborative efforts to conduct multicentric prospective studies could increase the publication rate of abstracts and enhance the overall scientific impact of the ESES congresses.
{"title":"Unveiling publishing patterns in the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons congress abstracts: a retrospective multicentric publication analysis.","authors":"Max Schneider, Agata Dukaczewska, Dirk-Jan van Beek, Klaas Van Den Heede, Gunjan Sharma, Martin Almquist","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02216-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02216-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2004, the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) has hosted biennial congresses as a platform for presenting key research. However, the publication rate of abstracts presented at these congresses is unknown. We searched for full publications using titles and authors of abstracts presented orally or as posters at ESES congresses from 2004 to 2018. Abstract factors, such as type of study and number of patients, were investigated in relation to publication rate, journal impact factor, and citation rates of published studies. Out of 733 abstracts presented at ESES during this period, 207 (28%) were presented orally and 528 (72%) as a poster, Overall, 456 of the abstracts (62%) were published, with a median time of 11.4 months from the ESES congress to publication [range - 64.5 to 156]. The median number of citations per published abstract was 21 [range 0-821], the average annual citation rate was 2.3 [0-54], and the median journal impact factor was 2.2 [0-21.3]. The median number of patients included per study was small, accounting for 71.5 [range 1-22,580]. While factors predicting higher chances for publication were oral format (OR 5), 2006 and 2008 ESES congresses (OR 21 and 12.6, respectively), larger sample sizes, oral presentation format, native English authorship, and randomized trials had higher annual citation rates. While the publication rates of ESES congress abstracts are high, collaborative efforts to conduct multicentric prospective studies could increase the publication rate of abstracts and enhance the overall scientific impact of the ESES congresses.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2205-2216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12630310/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02285-z
Vladimir Tverskov, Ory Wiesel, Samantha Schiller, Idan Carmeli, Nir Tsur, Hanoch Kashtan, Daniel Solomon
Benign esophageal perforations present a significant clinical challenge due to their high morbidity and potential for fatal outcomes. The complex nature of these perforations demands prompt diagnosis and effective management to mitigate the associated risks. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of various management strategies for esophageal perforations, focusing on the effectiveness of organ-preserving approaches. We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with benign esophageal perforation between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who underwent resection and those who did not. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients managed initially without resection to assess the success of organ-preserving strategies (successful organ preservation, SOP) vs. either salvage resection or death (unsuccessful organ preservation, UOP). Forty-two patients were included: 22 underwent esophageal resection, while 20 were managed non-operatively. The overall 90-day mortality rate was 26%, with higher mortality observed in the resection group. In patients managed initially without resection, 62.1% had successful outcomes, while 37.9% required salvage esophagectomy or died within 90 days. The Pittsburgh Severity Score (PSS) did not significantly predict the need for resection. Distal perforations underwent resection more frequently (p < .001). Overall 90-day mortality was high both among patients who underwent initial resection (5/13, 38.5%) and salvage esophagectomy (3/8, 37.5%). Twenty-nine patients did not initially undergo resection, of which n = 18 (62.1%) were categorized as SOP and n = 11 (37.9%) as UOP. Among the latter, n = 3 (10.3%) died within 90 days and n = 8 (27.6%) underwent salvage esophagectomy. On subgroup analysis on initially unresected patients, delayed diagnosis ≥ 24 h was higher among UOP than SOP patients (n = 5, 45.5% vs. n = 2, 11.1%, p = 0.49). Our findings underscore the importance of early diagnosis and the feasibility of a step-up approach in a select group of patients presenting with favorable variables.
{"title":"First impressions, second chances in esophageal perforations: treatment pathways and outcome prediction.","authors":"Vladimir Tverskov, Ory Wiesel, Samantha Schiller, Idan Carmeli, Nir Tsur, Hanoch Kashtan, Daniel Solomon","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02285-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02285-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Benign esophageal perforations present a significant clinical challenge due to their high morbidity and potential for fatal outcomes. The complex nature of these perforations demands prompt diagnosis and effective management to mitigate the associated risks. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of various management strategies for esophageal perforations, focusing on the effectiveness of organ-preserving approaches. We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with benign esophageal perforation between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who underwent resection and those who did not. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients managed initially without resection to assess the success of organ-preserving strategies (successful organ preservation, SOP) vs. either salvage resection or death (unsuccessful organ preservation, UOP). Forty-two patients were included: 22 underwent esophageal resection, while 20 were managed non-operatively. The overall 90-day mortality rate was 26%, with higher mortality observed in the resection group. In patients managed initially without resection, 62.1% had successful outcomes, while 37.9% required salvage esophagectomy or died within 90 days. The Pittsburgh Severity Score (PSS) did not significantly predict the need for resection. Distal perforations underwent resection more frequently (p < .001). Overall 90-day mortality was high both among patients who underwent initial resection (5/13, 38.5%) and salvage esophagectomy (3/8, 37.5%). Twenty-nine patients did not initially undergo resection, of which n = 18 (62.1%) were categorized as SOP and n = 11 (37.9%) as UOP. Among the latter, n = 3 (10.3%) died within 90 days and n = 8 (27.6%) underwent salvage esophagectomy. On subgroup analysis on initially unresected patients, delayed diagnosis ≥ 24 h was higher among UOP than SOP patients (n = 5, 45.5% vs. n = 2, 11.1%, p = 0.49). Our findings underscore the importance of early diagnosis and the feasibility of a step-up approach in a select group of patients presenting with favorable variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2245-2254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144498111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-04-09DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02169-2
Wenlong Qiu, Cheng Zhou, Wei Zhao, Shiwen Mei, Qian Liu
Local advanced rectal cancer (LARC) carries high recurrence risks, especially with lateral lymph node (LLN) involvement. This study aims to evaluate the role of ICG-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with clinical negative LLNs (maximum diameter < 7 mm), potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries and associated complications in patients with LARC. A retrospective analysis of 301 consecutive patients with lower LARC who underwent fluorescent lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy (FL-SLNB) or conventional LLND at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Clinical and pathological data were collected, and the patients were grouped into FL-SLNB and non-SLNB groups. Postoperative complications, recurrence rates, and survival outcomes were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models. FL-SLNB (173 patients) showed better perioperative outcomes than non-SLNB (128 patients), with shorter hospital stays (7 vs. 10 days, P = 0.027), less blood loss (150 vs. 180 mL, P = 0.032), and fewer complications: intraoperative bleeding (2.9% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.041), anastomotic leakage (1.7% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.045), and urinary dysfunction (3.5% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.039). No significant differences were observed in survival or recurrence rates (P > 0.05). pN stage was a significant predictor of distant metastasis (HR 1.953, P = 0.037). ICG-guided SLNB enhanced surgical precision and reduced unnecessary LLND in lower LARC with clinically negative LLNs, and improved surgical decision-making and minimizes postoperative complications.
局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)具有很高的复发风险,特别是与外侧淋巴结(LLN)累及。本研究旨在评估icg引导前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)在临床阴性LLNs患者中的作用(最大直径2试验、Mann-Whitney U试验、Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox比例风险模型)。FL-SLNB(173例)围手术期预后优于非slnb(128例),住院时间短(7天vs 10天,P = 0.027),出血量少(150 mL vs 180 mL, P = 0.032),并发症少:术中出血(2.9% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.041),吻合口漏(1.7% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.045),尿功能障碍(3.5% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.039)。两组生存率、复发率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。pN分期是远处转移的重要预测因子(HR 1.953, P = 0.037)。icg引导下的SLNB提高了手术精度,减少了临床阴性lln的下LARC的不必要LLND,改善了手术决策,最大限度地减少了术后并发症。
{"title":"ICG fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy for decision-making in lateral lymph node dissection in local advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study.","authors":"Wenlong Qiu, Cheng Zhou, Wei Zhao, Shiwen Mei, Qian Liu","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02169-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02169-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Local advanced rectal cancer (LARC) carries high recurrence risks, especially with lateral lymph node (LLN) involvement. This study aims to evaluate the role of ICG-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with clinical negative LLNs (maximum diameter < 7 mm), potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries and associated complications in patients with LARC. A retrospective analysis of 301 consecutive patients with lower LARC who underwent fluorescent lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy (FL-SLNB) or conventional LLND at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Clinical and pathological data were collected, and the patients were grouped into FL-SLNB and non-SLNB groups. Postoperative complications, recurrence rates, and survival outcomes were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using χ<sup>2</sup> tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models. FL-SLNB (173 patients) showed better perioperative outcomes than non-SLNB (128 patients), with shorter hospital stays (7 vs. 10 days, P = 0.027), less blood loss (150 vs. 180 mL, P = 0.032), and fewer complications: intraoperative bleeding (2.9% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.041), anastomotic leakage (1.7% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.045), and urinary dysfunction (3.5% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.039). No significant differences were observed in survival or recurrence rates (P > 0.05). pN stage was a significant predictor of distant metastasis (HR 1.953, P = 0.037). ICG-guided SLNB enhanced surgical precision and reduced unnecessary LLND in lower LARC with clinically negative LLNs, and improved surgical decision-making and minimizes postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2355-2363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144041799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-13DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02404-w
Yinzhe Xu, Zhiming Zhao, Xuan Zhang, Shaoke Sun, Zhaohai Wang, Xianglong Tan, Zhuzeng Yin, Minggen Hu, Shichun Lu, Rong Liu
Robotic-assisted hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery is increasingly adopted in high-volume centers. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and technical characteristics of the Toumai® robotic system in HPB surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 160 consecutive patients who underwent HBP surgery using the Toumai® system at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital between November 2024 and June 2025. Procedures included liver resection (92 cases: 32 lobectomies/segmentectomies and 60 local resections), pancreatic surgery (23 cases: 2 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 9 distal pancreatectomies, 11 tumor resections, 1 pancreatic duct incision and pancreaticojejunostomy), and biliary surgery (37 cases: 3 radical resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, 23 biliary explorations and stone removals, 6 gallbladder cancer resections, 3 choledochojejunostomies, and 2 cholecystectomies). Of the cohort, 46 patients (28.8%) had prior abdominal surgery. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 3 cases (1.9%). Postoperatively, one patient developed pancreatic fistula managed with percutaneous drainage; no other Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications or in-hospital deaths were observed. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 days (range, 1-27 days). Toumai® robotic-assisted surgery demonstrates preliminary feasibility and safety across a spectrum of HPB procedures. With technical refinements and device iterations, broader adoption may enhance the accessibility and affordability of robotic surgery in resource-variable settings..
{"title":"Robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery using the Toumai® system: initial experience and technical considerations from a single center.","authors":"Yinzhe Xu, Zhiming Zhao, Xuan Zhang, Shaoke Sun, Zhaohai Wang, Xianglong Tan, Zhuzeng Yin, Minggen Hu, Shichun Lu, Rong Liu","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02404-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02404-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic-assisted hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery is increasingly adopted in high-volume centers. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and technical characteristics of the Toumai® robotic system in HPB surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 160 consecutive patients who underwent HBP surgery using the Toumai® system at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital between November 2024 and June 2025. Procedures included liver resection (92 cases: 32 lobectomies/segmentectomies and 60 local resections), pancreatic surgery (23 cases: 2 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 9 distal pancreatectomies, 11 tumor resections, 1 pancreatic duct incision and pancreaticojejunostomy), and biliary surgery (37 cases: 3 radical resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, 23 biliary explorations and stone removals, 6 gallbladder cancer resections, 3 choledochojejunostomies, and 2 cholecystectomies). Of the cohort, 46 patients (28.8%) had prior abdominal surgery. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 3 cases (1.9%). Postoperatively, one patient developed pancreatic fistula managed with percutaneous drainage; no other Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications or in-hospital deaths were observed. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 days (range, 1-27 days). Toumai® robotic-assisted surgery demonstrates preliminary feasibility and safety across a spectrum of HPB procedures. With technical refinements and device iterations, broader adoption may enhance the accessibility and affordability of robotic surgery in resource-variable settings..</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2183-2189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145281192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-13DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02438-0
Yifang Zhu, Jialin Chen, Jianan Chen
Accurate preoperative evaluation of lymph-node metastasis (LNM) in patients with pathological T1 (pT1) colon cancer is essential for determining the appropriate extent of colectomy and lymphadenectomy. This study aimed to identify clinical and pathological predictors of LNM and to develop a practical tool for individualized risk assessment. Patients with pT1 colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. After applying exclusion criteria-including distant metastases, multiple primaries, missing key clinical data, and incomplete records-2700 cases were included. LNM status was compared across baseline variables using Chi-square and t tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of LNM, reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A nomogram was constructed based on significant variables and validated internally using 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Model performance was evaluated through area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision-curve analysis (DCA). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). LNM was present in 12.8% (n = 345) of cases. Patients with LNM were younger and more likely to present with sigmoid tumors, high-grade histology, perineural invasion, tumor deposits, and surgical delays. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with LNM included younger age, Black race (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08-2.20), sigmoid location (OR 1.70, 1.30-2.23), higher histological grade, surgical delay beyond 14 days, perineural invasion (OR 4.93, 2.24-10.77), and presence of tumor deposits (OR 4.70, 1.86-11.56). The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination (corrected AUC = 0.664) and calibration, with favorable net benefit at threshold probabilities below 20%. Five-year CSS was modestly lower in the LNM group (94.7 vs. 96.8%, P = 0.019), while OS showed no significant difference (P = 0.36). LNM is not uncommon in pT1 colon cancer. Several clinical and pathological features can help predict LNM risk. The proposed nomogram offers a useful, evidence-based tool to guide surgical decision-making and patient counseling. External validation is needed before routine clinical application.
病理T1 (pT1)结肠癌患者术前淋巴结转移(LNM)的准确评估对于确定结肠切除术和淋巴结切除术的合适范围至关重要。本研究旨在确定LNM的临床和病理预测因素,并开发个体化风险评估的实用工具。从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定2010年至2015年间诊断的pT1结肠腺癌患者。采用排除标准(包括远处转移、多发原发、缺少关键临床资料、记录不完整),纳入2700例病例。采用卡方检验和t检验比较不同基线变量的LNM状态。多变量逻辑回归用于确定LNM的独立预测因子,报告为95%置信区间(ci)的比值比(ORs)。基于显著变量构建nomogram,并在内部使用1000个bootstrap样本进行验证。通过曲线下面积(AUC)、校准和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估模型的性能。Kaplan-Meier方法用于估计癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和总生存期(OS)。12.8% (n = 345)的病例存在LNM。LNM患者更年轻,更容易出现乙状结肠肿瘤、高级别组织学、神经周围浸润、肿瘤沉积和手术延迟。在多变量分析中,与LNM独立相关的因素包括年轻、黑人(OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08-2.20)、乙状结肠位置(OR 1.70, 1.30-2.23)、较高的组织学分级、手术延迟超过14天、神经周围浸润(OR 4.93, 2.24-10.77)和肿瘤沉积的存在(OR 4.70, 1.86-11.56)。nomogram表现出良好的辨别能力(校正AUC = 0.664)和校准能力,在阈值概率低于20%时具有良好的净效益。LNM组5年CSS较低(94.7 vs 96.8%, P = 0.019), OS组差异无统计学意义(P = 0.36)。LNM在pT1结肠癌中并不罕见。一些临床和病理特征可以帮助预测LNM的风险。所建议的nomogram为指导手术决策和患者咨询提供了一个有用的、基于证据的工具。常规临床应用前需进行外部验证。
{"title":"Identification of clinical and pathological risk factors for lymph-node metastasis in T1 stage colon cancer: a population-based study.","authors":"Yifang Zhu, Jialin Chen, Jianan Chen","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02438-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13304-025-02438-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate preoperative evaluation of lymph-node metastasis (LNM) in patients with pathological T1 (pT1) colon cancer is essential for determining the appropriate extent of colectomy and lymphadenectomy. This study aimed to identify clinical and pathological predictors of LNM and to develop a practical tool for individualized risk assessment. Patients with pT1 colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. After applying exclusion criteria-including distant metastases, multiple primaries, missing key clinical data, and incomplete records-2700 cases were included. LNM status was compared across baseline variables using Chi-square and t tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of LNM, reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A nomogram was constructed based on significant variables and validated internally using 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Model performance was evaluated through area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision-curve analysis (DCA). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). LNM was present in 12.8% (n = 345) of cases. Patients with LNM were younger and more likely to present with sigmoid tumors, high-grade histology, perineural invasion, tumor deposits, and surgical delays. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with LNM included younger age, Black race (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08-2.20), sigmoid location (OR 1.70, 1.30-2.23), higher histological grade, surgical delay beyond 14 days, perineural invasion (OR 4.93, 2.24-10.77), and presence of tumor deposits (OR 4.70, 1.86-11.56). The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination (corrected AUC = 0.664) and calibration, with favorable net benefit at threshold probabilities below 20%. Five-year CSS was modestly lower in the LNM group (94.7 vs. 96.8%, P = 0.019), while OS showed no significant difference (P = 0.36). LNM is not uncommon in pT1 colon cancer. Several clinical and pathological features can help predict LNM risk. The proposed nomogram offers a useful, evidence-based tool to guide surgical decision-making and patient counseling. External validation is needed before routine clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2321-2330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145287111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}