Pub Date : 2026-01-02DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.001
Andrey Bazarkin, Mark Taratkin, Stanislav Vovdenko, Aleksandr Androsov, Maria Balashova, Andrey Morozov, Alina Itskevich, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Evgenii Bezrukov, Nirmish Singla, Leonid Rapoport, Evgenii Shpot, Petr Glybochko
Introduction: Until recently, the widespread use of genetic markers in prostate cancer (PCa) has been limited by the complexities and cost of genomic data analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI), due to its ability to process large volumes of unstructured data, holds the potential to play a transformative role in the future of medical genetics.
Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review using the Medline citation database and the Google Scholar search engine to evaluate the feasibility of AI applications in PCa diagnostics and disease progression prediction. We selected articles that presented data on the use of AI to identify genetic markers and/or their association with clinical data in patients with confirmed or suspected prostate cancer, without applying any time restriction. In total, 15 articles were included in the final analysis.
Results: Studies investigating the application of AI in prostate cancer diagnosis have demonstrated that machine learning (ML) methods can be effectively used to identify novel cancer-related genes from genetic databases. Additionally, ML algorithms have shown potential in predicting clinical risk in PCa. By analyzing miRNAs, mRNAs, lncRNAs, and patterns of gene upregulation and alteration, AI has been able to predict adverse clinical outcomes such as metastatic progression, biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy, reduced survival, and elevated serum PSA levels. Moreover, AI tools have been utilized to predict genitourinary complications after radiation therapy through genome-wide data analysis, to identify cell line phenotypes resistant to antiandrogen therapy and to detect novel signaling pathways that may be targeted by emerging systemic treatments.
Conclusion: AI-based methods appear to be promising tools for the identification of new genetic biomarkers in PCa, offering potential for improvements in disease detection, prognosis, and prediction of treatment response, including the identification of actionable therapeutic targets. However, their clinical implementation remains limited due to a lack of clinical validation and practical benefit uncertainties.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive genomic biomarkers for prostate cancer: Ready for prime time?","authors":"Andrey Bazarkin, Mark Taratkin, Stanislav Vovdenko, Aleksandr Androsov, Maria Balashova, Andrey Morozov, Alina Itskevich, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Evgenii Bezrukov, Nirmish Singla, Leonid Rapoport, Evgenii Shpot, Petr Glybochko","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Until recently, the widespread use of genetic markers in prostate cancer (PCa) has been limited by the complexities and cost of genomic data analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI), due to its ability to process large volumes of unstructured data, holds the potential to play a transformative role in the future of medical genetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review using the Medline citation database and the Google Scholar search engine to evaluate the feasibility of AI applications in PCa diagnostics and disease progression prediction. We selected articles that presented data on the use of AI to identify genetic markers and/or their association with clinical data in patients with confirmed or suspected prostate cancer, without applying any time restriction. In total, 15 articles were included in the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies investigating the application of AI in prostate cancer diagnosis have demonstrated that machine learning (ML) methods can be effectively used to identify novel cancer-related genes from genetic databases. Additionally, ML algorithms have shown potential in predicting clinical risk in PCa. By analyzing miRNAs, mRNAs, lncRNAs, and patterns of gene upregulation and alteration, AI has been able to predict adverse clinical outcomes such as metastatic progression, biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy, reduced survival, and elevated serum PSA levels. Moreover, AI tools have been utilized to predict genitourinary complications after radiation therapy through genome-wide data analysis, to identify cell line phenotypes resistant to antiandrogen therapy and to detect novel signaling pathways that may be targeted by emerging systemic treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-based methods appear to be promising tools for the identification of new genetic biomarkers in PCa, offering potential for improvements in disease detection, prognosis, and prediction of treatment response, including the identification of actionable therapeutic targets. However, their clinical implementation remains limited due to a lack of clinical validation and practical benefit uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"110965"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.017
Iqra Anwar, Arshad A Pandith, Shayaq Ul Abeer Rasool, Usma Manzoor, Khurshid I Mir, Iqbal M Lone, Nazia M Walvir, Tawseef A Lone, Mohammad S Wani
Introduction: The human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) upregulation is a common feature in many cancers. While telomerase activity is often linked to gene expression, the relationship between promoter methylation and hTERT levels can be complex. This study aimed to investigate the association between hTERT promoter hypermethylation and its expression for prognosis and pathogenesis of bladder cancer.
Methods: A total of 50 histologically confirmed bladder cancer tissue samples and matched adjacent normal controls were evaluated in a single-center prospective study. Promoter methylation was assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR) targeting the CpG-rich hTERT promoter region, while protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using standardized scoring criteria. For validation, TCGA-BLCA data were analyzed for TERT mRNA expression, promoter methylation (TSS1500 and gene body regions), copy-number alterations (CNA), and survival outcomes. Correlation analyses and Kaplan-Meier plots were used for integrative assessment.
Results: Promoter hypermethylation of hTERT was detected in 90% of bladder cancers, with 80% showing high hTERT protein expression. A strong positive association between promoter hypermethylation and high protein expression was observed (P = 0.04). This was corroborated by TCGA data showing a significant upregulation of TERT mRNA in bladder tumors. The expression of hTERT was at its strongest at stage IV, though this trend was not significant in the larger TCGA cohort (P = 0.256) The large-scale survival analysis revealed no significant association between TERT expression with OS (P = 0.76), PFS (0.95), DFS (P = 0.88) and pan-cancer analysis. TERT amplification was linked to markedly higher expression levels, but weak correlation between methylation and expression at selected CpG loci and methylation at TSS1500 or gene body regions and expression CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that hTERT promoter hypermethylation is paradoxically associated with increased protein expression in bladder cancer, possibly through disruption of repressor binding within the THOR region. Although hTERT expression lacks prognostic value, its consistent upregulation suggests potential use as a screening biomarker and supports exploration of telomerase-targeted therapeutic strategies.
{"title":"Promoter hypermethylation drives a paradoxical up regulation of hTERT with prognostic implications in bladder cancer.","authors":"Iqra Anwar, Arshad A Pandith, Shayaq Ul Abeer Rasool, Usma Manzoor, Khurshid I Mir, Iqbal M Lone, Nazia M Walvir, Tawseef A Lone, Mohammad S Wani","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) upregulation is a common feature in many cancers. While telomerase activity is often linked to gene expression, the relationship between promoter methylation and hTERT levels can be complex. This study aimed to investigate the association between hTERT promoter hypermethylation and its expression for prognosis and pathogenesis of bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 histologically confirmed bladder cancer tissue samples and matched adjacent normal controls were evaluated in a single-center prospective study. Promoter methylation was assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR) targeting the CpG-rich hTERT promoter region, while protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using standardized scoring criteria. For validation, TCGA-BLCA data were analyzed for TERT mRNA expression, promoter methylation (TSS1500 and gene body regions), copy-number alterations (CNA), and survival outcomes. Correlation analyses and Kaplan-Meier plots were used for integrative assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Promoter hypermethylation of hTERT was detected in 90% of bladder cancers, with 80% showing high hTERT protein expression. A strong positive association between promoter hypermethylation and high protein expression was observed (P = 0.04). This was corroborated by TCGA data showing a significant upregulation of TERT mRNA in bladder tumors. The expression of hTERT was at its strongest at stage IV, though this trend was not significant in the larger TCGA cohort (P = 0.256) The large-scale survival analysis revealed no significant association between TERT expression with OS (P = 0.76), PFS (0.95), DFS (P = 0.88) and pan-cancer analysis. TERT amplification was linked to markedly higher expression levels, but weak correlation between methylation and expression at selected CpG loci and methylation at TSS1500 or gene body regions and expression CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that hTERT promoter hypermethylation is paradoxically associated with increased protein expression in bladder cancer, possibly through disruption of repressor binding within the THOR region. Although hTERT expression lacks prognostic value, its consistent upregulation suggests potential use as a screening biomarker and supports exploration of telomerase-targeted therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"110963"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145889667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.003
Prisca Mbonu, Jacqueline Mersch, Jana Heady, Samuel Newman, Jolonda C Bullock, Kyle Seymour, David E Gerber, Kalyani Narra
Background: Germline genetic testing and genetic counseling have become integral aspects of prostate cancer management. In 2018, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) broadened testing recommendations to identify more at-risk individuals based on tumor characteristics and family cancer history. We assessed genetic counseling referrals and outcomes in relation to this expansion in a large safety-net population.
Methods: We analyzed cases of prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed in 2016 to 2023 at JPS Health Network (JPS), a safety-net provider in Texas. Demographic and clinical data including genetic counseling referrals and testing results were obtained from cancer registries and electronic health records. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression model.
Results: Among 543 patients, 46% were Black, 27% were Hispanic, and 40% had metastatic disease. Overall, 132 patients (24%) were referred for genetic counseling, of whom 102 (77%) completed the visits. Rates of referrals increased from 4% in 2017 to 9% in 2019 to 28% in 2023. A multivariate logistic regression determined that patients with stage 3 or 4 cancers were more likely than stage 1 to be referred (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01 respectively). Genetic testing was completed for 78 patients (76%) with 8 (10%) having 9 positive results in BRCA1 (n = 1), BRCA2 (n = 1), CHEK2 (n = 3), MSH2 (n = 2), PALB2 (n = 1), and PMS2 (n = 1).
Conclusion: Following guideline changes, genetic testing referrals for patients with prostate cancer increased approximately 7-fold in a safety-net setting. Over three-fourths of referred patients completed testing and 10% had positive results, demonstrating the feasibility and importance of genetic testing in underserved populations.
{"title":"Prostate cancer-related genetic counseling in a safety-net healthcare setting.","authors":"Prisca Mbonu, Jacqueline Mersch, Jana Heady, Samuel Newman, Jolonda C Bullock, Kyle Seymour, David E Gerber, Kalyani Narra","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Germline genetic testing and genetic counseling have become integral aspects of prostate cancer management. In 2018, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) broadened testing recommendations to identify more at-risk individuals based on tumor characteristics and family cancer history. We assessed genetic counseling referrals and outcomes in relation to this expansion in a large safety-net population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed cases of prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed in 2016 to 2023 at JPS Health Network (JPS), a safety-net provider in Texas. Demographic and clinical data including genetic counseling referrals and testing results were obtained from cancer registries and electronic health records. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 543 patients, 46% were Black, 27% were Hispanic, and 40% had metastatic disease. Overall, 132 patients (24%) were referred for genetic counseling, of whom 102 (77%) completed the visits. Rates of referrals increased from 4% in 2017 to 9% in 2019 to 28% in 2023. A multivariate logistic regression determined that patients with stage 3 or 4 cancers were more likely than stage 1 to be referred (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01 respectively). Genetic testing was completed for 78 patients (76%) with 8 (10%) having 9 positive results in BRCA1 (n = 1), BRCA2 (n = 1), CHEK2 (n = 3), MSH2 (n = 2), PALB2 (n = 1), and PMS2 (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following guideline changes, genetic testing referrals for patients with prostate cancer increased approximately 7-fold in a safety-net setting. Over three-fourths of referred patients completed testing and 10% had positive results, demonstrating the feasibility and importance of genetic testing in underserved populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"110967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.002
Hamed Ahmadi, Tarik Benidir, Alon Lazarovich, Lynn Anson-Cartwright, Martin O'Malley, Scott E Eggener, Robert J Hamilton, Siamak Daneshmand
Background and objective: The preferred management of clinical stage I (CS1) germ cell tumor (GCT) is surveillance. Standard surveillance imaging protocols expose young patients to potential radiation-related consequences and have financial implications. We evaluated the safety of omitting routine pelvic imaging.
Methods: Patients with CS1 GCT electing surveillance at 3 major referral centers were included. "Pelvis only" recurrence was defined as those detectable solely on pelvic imaging below the bifurcation of common iliac vessels. Any inguinal recurrence detected on pelvic imaging was considered an "inguinal recurrence." Standard surveillance imaging protocols were used to estimate radiation dose reduction and cost saving per patient.
Results: A total of 285 patients were included. Forty-three patients (15%) had pelvic/inguinal nodal recurrence and 16/43 (37%) were detectable by imaging alone. However, in 11/16 (69%), pelvic/inguinal nodal disease was either visible on CT abdomen cuts (3) or there was simultaneous retroperitoneal recurrence (8). Only 5/285 (1.7%) patients had pelvis/inguinal recurrence only detectable on CT pelvis. Only 3/220 (1.3%) patients with no prior cryptorchidism or inguinal/scrotal surgery had pelvis only recurrence. The estimated reduction in radiation dose ranged between 2.31 and 3.46 mSv over 5 years with cost savings of 700 to 800 USD per patient. A limitation of the study includes variability in imaging protocols amongst the centers.
Conclusion: Isolated pelvic/inguinal recurrence in CS1 GCT is rare and routine pelvic imaging appears to have limited value. Omitting CT pelvis could also reduce radiation exposure and offers cost-saving.
{"title":"Safety of omitting pelvic imaging in patients with stage I germ cell tumor (GCT) on surveillance: A multi-institutional study.","authors":"Hamed Ahmadi, Tarik Benidir, Alon Lazarovich, Lynn Anson-Cartwright, Martin O'Malley, Scott E Eggener, Robert J Hamilton, Siamak Daneshmand","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The preferred management of clinical stage I (CS1) germ cell tumor (GCT) is surveillance. Standard surveillance imaging protocols expose young patients to potential radiation-related consequences and have financial implications. We evaluated the safety of omitting routine pelvic imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CS1 GCT electing surveillance at 3 major referral centers were included. \"Pelvis only\" recurrence was defined as those detectable solely on pelvic imaging below the bifurcation of common iliac vessels. Any inguinal recurrence detected on pelvic imaging was considered an \"inguinal recurrence.\" Standard surveillance imaging protocols were used to estimate radiation dose reduction and cost saving per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 285 patients were included. Forty-three patients (15%) had pelvic/inguinal nodal recurrence and 16/43 (37%) were detectable by imaging alone. However, in 11/16 (69%), pelvic/inguinal nodal disease was either visible on CT abdomen cuts (3) or there was simultaneous retroperitoneal recurrence (8). Only 5/285 (1.7%) patients had pelvis/inguinal recurrence only detectable on CT pelvis. Only 3/220 (1.3%) patients with no prior cryptorchidism or inguinal/scrotal surgery had pelvis only recurrence. The estimated reduction in radiation dose ranged between 2.31 and 3.46 mSv over 5 years with cost savings of 700 to 800 USD per patient. A limitation of the study includes variability in imaging protocols amongst the centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Isolated pelvic/inguinal recurrence in CS1 GCT is rare and routine pelvic imaging appears to have limited value. Omitting CT pelvis could also reduce radiation exposure and offers cost-saving.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"110966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Our aim was to examine a diverse patient population to identify any sociodemographic factors, specifically lack of health care coverage, that may worsen aggressiveness of disease on presentation and negatively impact outcomes in testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT).
Methods: Patients who were diagnosed and treated for TGCT at both a SNH (Safety-Net Hospital) and TCH (Tertiary Care Hospital) covered by the same institution and physicians were retrospectively reviewed to assess any disparities in outcomes. We evaluated whether insurance coverage affected the severity of disease on presentation based on International Germ Cell Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification.
Results: Between January 2009 and December 2020, 144 patients were considered underinsured compared to 82 patients that were fully insured. Underinsured patients were more likely to be treated at SNH (85.4% vs. 7.3% P < 0.01), more likely to be Hispanic (73.6% vs. 17.1%, P < 0.01) and more likely to present with advanced disease (P = 0.01). IGCCG risk at presentation was worse for underinsured vs. insured including 19 patients (23.8%) vs. 3 patients (8.1%) with intermediate risk disease and 22 patients (27.5%) vs. 5 patients (13.5%) with poor risk disease (P < 0.01). Although recurrence after first line chemotherapy was similar between underinsured and insured (P = 0.38), the CSS outcomes were worse in those patients without insurance (P = 0.02). Patients with worse presentation of disease (IGCCCG risk group) also demonstrated worse CSS outcomes (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Insurance status can be associated with a worse prognostic disease presentation of TGCT and may have implications on treatment options and survival. These findings underscore the necessity of community outreach and educational interventions targeting populations in SNHs to improve earlier access to care or increase availability of salvage options in rare cases to mitigate these disparities.
{"title":"Impact of insurance status on testicular cancer outcomes: A single-institution, dual-site study.","authors":"Ifeanyi Chidera Ibezue, Zine-Eddine Khene, Raj Bhanvadia, Yair Lotan, Vitaly Margulis, Solomon Woldu, Xiaosong Meng, Aditya Bagrodia, Waddah Arafat, Jue Wang, Farrukh Awan, Kris Gaston, Isamu Tachibana","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our aim was to examine a diverse patient population to identify any sociodemographic factors, specifically lack of health care coverage, that may worsen aggressiveness of disease on presentation and negatively impact outcomes in testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were diagnosed and treated for TGCT at both a SNH (Safety-Net Hospital) and TCH (Tertiary Care Hospital) covered by the same institution and physicians were retrospectively reviewed to assess any disparities in outcomes. We evaluated whether insurance coverage affected the severity of disease on presentation based on International Germ Cell Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2009 and December 2020, 144 patients were considered underinsured compared to 82 patients that were fully insured. Underinsured patients were more likely to be treated at SNH (85.4% vs. 7.3% P < 0.01), more likely to be Hispanic (73.6% vs. 17.1%, P < 0.01) and more likely to present with advanced disease (P = 0.01). IGCCG risk at presentation was worse for underinsured vs. insured including 19 patients (23.8%) vs. 3 patients (8.1%) with intermediate risk disease and 22 patients (27.5%) vs. 5 patients (13.5%) with poor risk disease (P < 0.01). Although recurrence after first line chemotherapy was similar between underinsured and insured (P = 0.38), the CSS outcomes were worse in those patients without insurance (P = 0.02). Patients with worse presentation of disease (IGCCCG risk group) also demonstrated worse CSS outcomes (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insurance status can be associated with a worse prognostic disease presentation of TGCT and may have implications on treatment options and survival. These findings underscore the necessity of community outreach and educational interventions targeting populations in SNHs to improve earlier access to care or increase availability of salvage options in rare cases to mitigate these disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"110969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Doublet therapy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) or triplet therapy of ADT with docetaxel and ARSI represent possible treatment options in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSCaP). However, real-world data comparing these 2 treatments are lacking. Our objective was to compare prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics between doublet and triplet therapy in patients with mCSCaP.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed systemic treatment-naïve mCSCaP patients treated in Japan between 2018 and 2024. The patients received either doublet or triplet therapy. PSA nadir (≤ 0.02 ng/ml) and PSA response rates (≥ 90%, ≥ 99% reduction from baseline at 3 months) were assessed. Propensity score matching (2:1 ratio) was used to balance patient characteristics.
Results: After matching 768 patients with mCSCaP, 188 patients were included in the doublet and 94 in the triplet therapy groups. At 12 months, the proportion of patients achieving PSA ≤ 0.02 ng/ml was significantly higher in the triplet group than in the doublet group (P < 0.05), particularly among those with high-volume disease. PSA response ≥ 99% at 3 months was comparable between the 2 groups (P = 0.08). Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥ 3 were more frequent with triplet therapy.
Conclusions: Triplet therapy may offer superior PSA decline in patients with high-volume disease, however, this benefit comes at the cost of increased toxicity. Treatment choice should consider disease volume and patient tolerability.
{"title":"Comparison of prostate-specific antigen kinetics between androgen receptor signaling inhibitor doublet therapy and androgen receptor signaling inhibitor with docetaxel triplet therapy in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.","authors":"Tsuyoshi Morita, Yutaka Yamamoto, Saizo Fujimoto, Mamoru Hashimoto, Takafumi Minami, Wataru Fukuokaya, Fumihiko Urabe, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Akihito Takeuchi, Ryoichi Maenosono, Takuya Tsujino, Hirofumi Morinaka, Kiyoshi Takahara, Kazumasa Komura, Teruo Inamoto, Haruhito Azuma, Takahiro Kimura, Kazutoshi Fujita","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doublet therapy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) or triplet therapy of ADT with docetaxel and ARSI represent possible treatment options in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSCaP). However, real-world data comparing these 2 treatments are lacking. Our objective was to compare prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics between doublet and triplet therapy in patients with mCSCaP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed systemic treatment-naïve mCSCaP patients treated in Japan between 2018 and 2024. The patients received either doublet or triplet therapy. PSA nadir (≤ 0.02 ng/ml) and PSA response rates (≥ 90%, ≥ 99% reduction from baseline at 3 months) were assessed. Propensity score matching (2:1 ratio) was used to balance patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching 768 patients with mCSCaP, 188 patients were included in the doublet and 94 in the triplet therapy groups. At 12 months, the proportion of patients achieving PSA ≤ 0.02 ng/ml was significantly higher in the triplet group than in the doublet group (P < 0.05), particularly among those with high-volume disease. PSA response ≥ 99% at 3 months was comparable between the 2 groups (P = 0.08). Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥ 3 were more frequent with triplet therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triplet therapy may offer superior PSA decline in patients with high-volume disease, however, this benefit comes at the cost of increased toxicity. Treatment choice should consider disease volume and patient tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"110968"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.006
Mengnan Qu, Jinchang Wei, Jiazhi Mo, Jiayuan Chen, Xiaowen Wu, Huayan Xu, Li Zhou, Juan Li, Xieqiao Yan, Chuanliang Cui, Lu Si, Zhihong Chi, Jun Guo, Xinan Sheng
Background: The relative clinical value of disitamab vedotin (RC48) monotherapy versus its combination with a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor remains unclear in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LA/mUC). Identifying patients who truly benefit from immunotherapy intensification is therefore critical to guide personalized treatment and avoid overtreatment.
Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of RC48 monotherapy versus its combination with a PD-1 inhibitor in pretreated patients with LA/mUC. To address potential confounders, multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety assessment.
Results: The median follow-up for the 195 patients was 10.3 months. No significant difference in OS was observed between combination therapy and monotherapy (median OS, 16.7 vs. 22.0 months; HR 1.09; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI], 0.67-1.78; P = 0.73). PFS, ORR, and DCR did not differ significantly between groups. In exploratory analyses, patients with HER2-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors showed improved outcomes with combination therapy (OS HR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.86; P = 0.03; PFS HR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.89; P = 0.02). PFS benefit was also observed in those with nondivergently differentiated histology (HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98; P = 0.04).
Conclusion: While RC48 combined with a PD-1 inhibitor did not confer survival advantage in the overall population, patients with HER2-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors, as well as those without divergent histologic differentiation, may derive additional benefit from combination therapy. Safety findings were consistent with prior experience.
背景:在先前接受过局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌(LA/mUC)治疗的患者中,地西他麦维多汀(RC48)单药治疗与与程序性细胞死亡蛋白1 (PD-1)抑制剂联合治疗的相对临床价值尚不清楚。因此,确定真正受益于免疫强化治疗的患者对于指导个性化治疗和避免过度治疗至关重要。患者和方法:我们进行了一项回顾性分析,比较了RC48单药治疗与PD-1抑制剂联合治疗前LA/mUC患者的临床结果。为了解决潜在的混杂因素,采用了多重归算和处理加权逆概率(IPTW)。主要终点是总生存期(OS);次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和安全性评估。结果:195例患者的中位随访时间为10.3个月。联合治疗和单药治疗的OS无显著差异(中位OS, 16.7 vs. 22.0个月;HR 1.09; 95%可信区间[95% CI], 0.67-1.78; P = 0.73)。PFS、ORR、DCR组间差异无统计学意义。在探索性分析中,her2阳性和pd - l1阴性肿瘤患者在联合治疗后表现出改善的结果(OS HR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.86; P = 0.03; PFS HR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.89; P = 0.02)。非分化组织学患者也可获得PFS益处(HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98; P = 0.04)。结论:虽然RC48联合PD-1抑制剂并不能在总体人群中获得生存优势,但her2阳性和pd - l1阴性肿瘤患者,以及那些没有不同组织学分化的患者,可能从联合治疗中获得额外的益处。安全性调查结果与先前的经验一致。
{"title":"Disitamab vedotin with or without PD-1 inhibitors in pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Identifying patients who derive additional benefit from immune combination therapy.","authors":"Mengnan Qu, Jinchang Wei, Jiazhi Mo, Jiayuan Chen, Xiaowen Wu, Huayan Xu, Li Zhou, Juan Li, Xieqiao Yan, Chuanliang Cui, Lu Si, Zhihong Chi, Jun Guo, Xinan Sheng","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relative clinical value of disitamab vedotin (RC48) monotherapy versus its combination with a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor remains unclear in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LA/mUC). Identifying patients who truly benefit from immunotherapy intensification is therefore critical to guide personalized treatment and avoid overtreatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of RC48 monotherapy versus its combination with a PD-1 inhibitor in pretreated patients with LA/mUC. To address potential confounders, multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up for the 195 patients was 10.3 months. No significant difference in OS was observed between combination therapy and monotherapy (median OS, 16.7 vs. 22.0 months; HR 1.09; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI], 0.67-1.78; P = 0.73). PFS, ORR, and DCR did not differ significantly between groups. In exploratory analyses, patients with HER2-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors showed improved outcomes with combination therapy (OS HR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.86; P = 0.03; PFS HR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.89; P = 0.02). PFS benefit was also observed in those with nondivergently differentiated histology (HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98; P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While RC48 combined with a PD-1 inhibitor did not confer survival advantage in the overall population, patients with HER2-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors, as well as those without divergent histologic differentiation, may derive additional benefit from combination therapy. Safety findings were consistent with prior experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"110970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-27DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.008
{"title":"Featured SUO fellow: Jiping Zeng, MD","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"44 2","pages":"Page 109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-20DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.013
Xiaoyi Zhang, Na Xiao, Hao Liang, Peixin Li, Yaozhong Zhang, Shijie Zhang, Bin Zhou, Shengwen Yao, Zizhuo Yang, Jun Chen
Prostate cancer remains a major global burden; diagnostic pathways rely on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and histopathology but face false positives, interobserver variability, and risk of overtreatment. We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed human studies (2015-February 2025; PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar) on artificial intelligence (AI) across imaging and digital pathology. Evidence shows that assistive AI can match or exceed expert performance while improving workflow. In a large international paired confirmatory study (PI-CAI), an MRI-based AI system achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.91 versus 0.86 for 62 radiologists, detected 6.8% more Grade Group (GG) ≥2 cancers at matched specificity, and yielded ∼50% fewer false positives and 20% fewer indolent (GG1) detections at matched sensitivity. Risk tools configured for high-sensitivity rule-out (90%-95%) report high negative predictive value (NPV) 97.5% to 98.0% and enable meaningful biopsy avoidance. In digital pathology, independent assessments of Paige Prostate report 97.7% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity on core biopsies, while real-world deployments reduce immunohistochemistry requests, second-opinion rates, and reporting time. Collectively, these data support deploying AI as a second-reader/triage with standardized acquisition and quality assurance, local calibration, and drift monitoring. Priority evidence needs include multicenter prospective studies and pragmatic real-world evidence (RWE) reporting patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness, with continued attention to fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance.
前列腺癌仍然是一个主要的全球负担;诊断途径依赖于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)和组织病理学,但存在假阳性、观察者之间的差异和过度治疗的风险。我们对同行评审的人类研究(2015- 2025年2月;PubMed, Web of Science, b谷歌Scholar)进行了一项关于人工智能(AI)在成像和数字病理学方面的叙述性回顾。有证据表明,辅助人工智能可以在改善工作流程的同时达到或超过专家的表现。在一项大型国际配对验证性研究(PI-CAI)中,基于mri的AI系统在62名放射科医生中获得的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.91,而不是0.86,在匹配的特异性下检测到的分级组(GG)≥2级癌症多6.8%,在匹配的敏感性下产生的假阳性和惰性(GG1)检测减少了约50%。配置为高灵敏度排除(90%-95%)的风险工具报告高阴性预测值(NPV)为97.5%至98.0%,并能够避免有意义的活检。在数字病理学中,独立评估Paige前列腺癌对核心活检的敏感性为97.7%,特异性为99.3%,而真实世界的部署减少了免疫组织化学要求、第二意见率和报告时间。总的来说,这些数据支持将人工智能部署为具有标准化采集和质量保证、本地校准和漂移监测的第二阅读器/分类器。优先证据需求包括多中心前瞻性研究和实用现实世界证据(RWE)报告患者结果和成本效益,并持续关注公平性、隐私性和法规遵从性。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-driven prostate cancer diagnosis: Enhancing accuracy and personalizing patient care.","authors":"Xiaoyi Zhang, Na Xiao, Hao Liang, Peixin Li, Yaozhong Zhang, Shijie Zhang, Bin Zhou, Shengwen Yao, Zizhuo Yang, Jun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer remains a major global burden; diagnostic pathways rely on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and histopathology but face false positives, interobserver variability, and risk of overtreatment. We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed human studies (2015-February 2025; PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar) on artificial intelligence (AI) across imaging and digital pathology. Evidence shows that assistive AI can match or exceed expert performance while improving workflow. In a large international paired confirmatory study (PI-CAI), an MRI-based AI system achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.91 versus 0.86 for 62 radiologists, detected 6.8% more Grade Group (GG) ≥2 cancers at matched specificity, and yielded ∼50% fewer false positives and 20% fewer indolent (GG1) detections at matched sensitivity. Risk tools configured for high-sensitivity rule-out (90%-95%) report high negative predictive value (NPV) 97.5% to 98.0% and enable meaningful biopsy avoidance. In digital pathology, independent assessments of Paige Prostate report 97.7% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity on core biopsies, while real-world deployments reduce immunohistochemistry requests, second-opinion rates, and reporting time. Collectively, these data support deploying AI as a second-reader/triage with standardized acquisition and quality assurance, local calibration, and drift monitoring. Priority evidence needs include multicenter prospective studies and pragmatic real-world evidence (RWE) reporting patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness, with continued attention to fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-20DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.018
Matthew L Hung, Robin Wang, Cathy Yu, Julie Kim, Alexander M Vezeridis, Andrew C Picel, Andrew J Gunn, Nishita Kothary
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of sequential transarterial embolization and percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses > 3 cm.
Materials and methods: Forty six patients underwent sequential transarterial embolization and percutaneous cryoablation of a renal mass > 3 cm (31 patients with mass > 4 cm) at two tertiary academic medical centers between 2014 and 2024. Primary efficacy was defined as the percentage of target tumors with no evidence of residual enhancement following the initial procedure. Secondary efficacy included tumors that underwent successful repeat ablation after identifying local tumor progression. Adverse events were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to determine progression-free survival rates.
Results: The median tumor diameter was 4.5 cm (IQR 3.5-5.3 cm). Primary and secondary efficacy rates for T1a lesions were 93% and 100%, respectively. Primary and secondary efficacy rates for T1b lesions were 81% and 87%, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 94% and 87%, respectively, after a median imaging follow-up period over 1.6 years (IQR 0.9-3.1). The overall adverse event rate was 13% (6/46) and the severe adverse event rate was 4% (2/46). Both severe adverse events were related to post-procedural hemorrhage.
Conclusion: Sequential transarterial embolization and percutaneous cryoablation is a technically feasible and effective treatment option with a low severe adverse event rate for renal masses > 3 cm.
目的:探讨经动脉序贯栓塞和经皮冷冻消融治疗肾肿物的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:2014年至2024年,在两个三级学术医疗中心,46例患者接受了连续经动脉栓塞和经皮冷冻消融肾肿块bbb3cm(31例为> 4cm)。初始疗效定义为在初始手术后没有残留增强证据的目标肿瘤的百分比。次要疗效包括在确定局部肿瘤进展后成功进行重复消融的肿瘤。不良事件按照介入放射学会的标准进行分类。Kaplan-Meier生存分析用于确定无进展生存率。结果:肿瘤中位直径4.5 cm (IQR 3.5 ~ 5.3 cm)。T1a病变的一次和二次有效率分别为93%和100%。T1b病变的原发性和继发性有效率分别为81%和87%。中位影像学随访时间超过1.6年(IQR 0.9-3.1), 1年和2年无进展生存率分别为94%和87%。总不良事件发生率为13%(6/46),严重不良事件发生率为4%(2/46)。两种严重不良事件均与术后出血有关。结论:序贯动脉栓塞加经皮冷冻消融术是治疗肾肿块技术上可行、有效且严重不良事件发生率低的方法。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of sequential transarterial embolization and cryoablation of renal masses greater than 3 cm.","authors":"Matthew L Hung, Robin Wang, Cathy Yu, Julie Kim, Alexander M Vezeridis, Andrew C Picel, Andrew J Gunn, Nishita Kothary","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the efficacy and safety of sequential transarterial embolization and percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses > 3 cm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty six patients underwent sequential transarterial embolization and percutaneous cryoablation of a renal mass > 3 cm (31 patients with mass > 4 cm) at two tertiary academic medical centers between 2014 and 2024. Primary efficacy was defined as the percentage of target tumors with no evidence of residual enhancement following the initial procedure. Secondary efficacy included tumors that underwent successful repeat ablation after identifying local tumor progression. Adverse events were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to determine progression-free survival rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median tumor diameter was 4.5 cm (IQR 3.5-5.3 cm). Primary and secondary efficacy rates for T1a lesions were 93% and 100%, respectively. Primary and secondary efficacy rates for T1b lesions were 81% and 87%, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 94% and 87%, respectively, after a median imaging follow-up period over 1.6 years (IQR 0.9-3.1). The overall adverse event rate was 13% (6/46) and the severe adverse event rate was 4% (2/46). Both severe adverse events were related to post-procedural hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sequential transarterial embolization and percutaneous cryoablation is a technically feasible and effective treatment option with a low severe adverse event rate for renal masses > 3 cm.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}