Pub Date : 2026-03-22DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111079
Federico Ferraris, Jay Raman, Fabian Yaber
{"title":"Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: still an indication?","authors":"Federico Ferraris, Jay Raman, Fabian Yaber","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111079","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147504818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-22DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111076
Nick J Lee, Federico Polverino, Leonardo Quarta, Maximilian Filzmayer, Michele Petix, Jordan A Goyal, Nicola Longo, Gennaro Musi, Felix K H Chun, Alberto Briganti, Shahrokh F Shariat, Fred Saad, Pierre I Karakiewicz
Background: Current guidelines recommend trimodal therapy (TMT) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer when complete visible transurethral resection is feasible, but no specific tumor size cutoff is defined. We evaluated the impact of tumor size on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in T2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer treated with TMT.
Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2022), pT2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with TMT were identified. Sequential testing of tumor size cutoffs of 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm were applied. Propensity score matching and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were used.
Results: Among 3,014 included pT2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with TMT, tumor size ranged from 0.3 to 10.0 cm (median 4.0 cm). In multivariable CRR models, each tested cutoff independently predicted higher CSM, except for at 3 cm. Multivariable CRR-derived hazard ratios (HR) for cutoffs of 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm were respectively 1.23, 1.28, 1.72, and 2.22 (all P < 0.05). Applying established and recommended noninferiority margins in oncology trials of up to 30% suggests that tumor size cutoff of 6 cm (HR 1.72) could represent a clinically meaningful criterion used in patient selection for TMT. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of data on comorbidities and treatment specifics.
Conclusion: Tumor size is directly proportional to CSM rate in pT2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer treated with TMT. A tumor size cutoff of 6 cm (HR 1.72) could represent a clinically meaningful criterion used in patient selection for TMT when the intent of avoiding excess CSM represents the endpoint of interest.
{"title":"Tumor size effect on cancer-specific mortality in T2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer treated with trimodal therapy.","authors":"Nick J Lee, Federico Polverino, Leonardo Quarta, Maximilian Filzmayer, Michele Petix, Jordan A Goyal, Nicola Longo, Gennaro Musi, Felix K H Chun, Alberto Briganti, Shahrokh F Shariat, Fred Saad, Pierre I Karakiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend trimodal therapy (TMT) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer when complete visible transurethral resection is feasible, but no specific tumor size cutoff is defined. We evaluated the impact of tumor size on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in T2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer treated with TMT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2022), pT2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with TMT were identified. Sequential testing of tumor size cutoffs of 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm were applied. Propensity score matching and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,014 included pT2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with TMT, tumor size ranged from 0.3 to 10.0 cm (median 4.0 cm). In multivariable CRR models, each tested cutoff independently predicted higher CSM, except for at 3 cm. Multivariable CRR-derived hazard ratios (HR) for cutoffs of 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm were respectively 1.23, 1.28, 1.72, and 2.22 (all P < 0.05). Applying established and recommended noninferiority margins in oncology trials of up to 30% suggests that tumor size cutoff of 6 cm (HR 1.72) could represent a clinically meaningful criterion used in patient selection for TMT. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of data on comorbidities and treatment specifics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tumor size is directly proportional to CSM rate in pT2N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer treated with TMT. A tumor size cutoff of 6 cm (HR 1.72) could represent a clinically meaningful criterion used in patient selection for TMT when the intent of avoiding excess CSM represents the endpoint of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111076"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147504785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous malignancy marked by considerable variability in tumor biology and treatment response. Traditional 2-dimensional (2D) cell culture models have provided valuable insights into RCC, but their limitations in replicating the tumor microenvironment and complex cellular interactions necessitate more advanced platforms. Three-dimensional (3D) culture systems - particularly patient-derived organoids (PDOs) - have emerged as promising tools to model RCC with enhanced physiological relevance. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current methodologies for generating RCC PDOs, including Matrigel-based cultures, air-liquid interface (ALI) systems, and microfluidic organ-on-a-chip technologies. We explore the critical factors influencing successful organoid development, such as tissue sourcing, culture media composition, and the incorporation of tumor microenvironment components. The applications of RCC PDOs span drug screening, modeling tumorigenesis and metastasis, immunotherapy studies, and basic research into RCC biology. Notably, organoids have shown potential for predicting individual patient responses to therapy, advancing the vision of personalized medicine. Despite their promise, challenges remain in terms of long-term culture stability, standardization of protocols, and comprehensive microenvironment replication. Future directions include refining bioengineering techniques, integrating multi-omics analyses, and enhancing immunocompetency in organoid systems. In conclusion, RCC PDOs represent a transformative advance in preclinical modeling, with growing utility in translational and precision oncology.
{"title":"Patient-derived organoids in renal cell carcinoma: A review of methodologies and applications.","authors":"Filippo Gavi, Giuseppe Pallotta, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Daniele Fettucciari, Enrico Panio, Simone Assumma, Pierluigi Russo, Domenico Sanesi, Antonio Silvestri, Roberto Iacovelli, Chiara Ciccarese, Mauro Ragonese, Nazario Foschi, Angelo Totaro, Riccardo Bientinesi, Pamela Bielli, Camilla Nero, Claudio Sette, Bernardo Rocco","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous malignancy marked by considerable variability in tumor biology and treatment response. Traditional 2-dimensional (2D) cell culture models have provided valuable insights into RCC, but their limitations in replicating the tumor microenvironment and complex cellular interactions necessitate more advanced platforms. Three-dimensional (3D) culture systems - particularly patient-derived organoids (PDOs) - have emerged as promising tools to model RCC with enhanced physiological relevance. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current methodologies for generating RCC PDOs, including Matrigel-based cultures, air-liquid interface (ALI) systems, and microfluidic organ-on-a-chip technologies. We explore the critical factors influencing successful organoid development, such as tissue sourcing, culture media composition, and the incorporation of tumor microenvironment components. The applications of RCC PDOs span drug screening, modeling tumorigenesis and metastasis, immunotherapy studies, and basic research into RCC biology. Notably, organoids have shown potential for predicting individual patient responses to therapy, advancing the vision of personalized medicine. Despite their promise, challenges remain in terms of long-term culture stability, standardization of protocols, and comprehensive microenvironment replication. Future directions include refining bioengineering techniques, integrating multi-omics analyses, and enhancing immunocompetency in organoid systems. In conclusion, RCC PDOs represent a transformative advance in preclinical modeling, with growing utility in translational and precision oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147504744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-20DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111061
Umberto Anceschi, Eugenio Bologna, Daniele Amparore, Rocco Simone Flammia, Aldo Brassetti, Leslie Claire Licari, Flavia Proietti, Alfredo Maria Bove, Gabriele Tuderti, Riccardo Mastroianni, Maria Consiglia Ferriero, Antonio Tufano, Giuseppe Spadaro, Silvia Cartolano, Maddalena Iori, Federico Piramide, Alexandru Turcan, Salvatore Guaglianone, Costantino Leonardo, Cristian Fiori, Michele Gallucci, Francesco Porpiglia, Giuseppe Simone
Background: The role of redo minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (rMIPN) for single ipsilateral renal cancer recurrences (RCRs) after prior nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) remains debated. rMIPN offers the potential for renal preservation but carries substantial surgical complexity and perioperative risk. This dual-institutional study compared perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of rMIPN versus redo minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (rMIRN) for solitary ipsilateral RCRs.
Methods: From January 2004 to October 2024, 2 prospectively maintained renal cancer databases were queried for patients with solitary, localized RCRs treated with rMIPN (n = 63) or rMIRN (n = 41). Baseline demographics, operative data, renal function, and pathologic findings were retrospectively extracted. Kaplan-Meier analysis tested overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression to stage ≥ 3b chronic kidney disease (CKD), with log-rank test comparisons.
Results: Baseline demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. rMIPN was associated with longer hospital stay (median 3 vs. 2 days), higher complication rates (22.2% vs. 4.9%), and greater transfusion requirements (7.9% vs. 0%; all P < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 47.5 months [IQR 22.2-75], OS, CSS, and CKD progression did not differ significantly between rMIPN and rMIRN (all P > 0.05).
Conclusions: rMIPN provides oncologic and functional outcomes comparable to rMIRN but at the cost of higher perioperative morbidity. Surgical selection should be individualized, weighing the potential benefits of nephron preservation against the higher surgical risks.
{"title":"Redo partial or radical nephrectomy for solitary renal recurrence after previous nephron-sparing surgery: Is functional preservation always justified?","authors":"Umberto Anceschi, Eugenio Bologna, Daniele Amparore, Rocco Simone Flammia, Aldo Brassetti, Leslie Claire Licari, Flavia Proietti, Alfredo Maria Bove, Gabriele Tuderti, Riccardo Mastroianni, Maria Consiglia Ferriero, Antonio Tufano, Giuseppe Spadaro, Silvia Cartolano, Maddalena Iori, Federico Piramide, Alexandru Turcan, Salvatore Guaglianone, Costantino Leonardo, Cristian Fiori, Michele Gallucci, Francesco Porpiglia, Giuseppe Simone","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of redo minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (rMIPN) for single ipsilateral renal cancer recurrences (RCRs) after prior nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) remains debated. rMIPN offers the potential for renal preservation but carries substantial surgical complexity and perioperative risk. This dual-institutional study compared perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of rMIPN versus redo minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (rMIRN) for solitary ipsilateral RCRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2004 to October 2024, 2 prospectively maintained renal cancer databases were queried for patients with solitary, localized RCRs treated with rMIPN (n = 63) or rMIRN (n = 41). Baseline demographics, operative data, renal function, and pathologic findings were retrospectively extracted. Kaplan-Meier analysis tested overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression to stage ≥ 3b chronic kidney disease (CKD), with log-rank test comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. rMIPN was associated with longer hospital stay (median 3 vs. 2 days), higher complication rates (22.2% vs. 4.9%), and greater transfusion requirements (7.9% vs. 0%; all P < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 47.5 months [IQR 22.2-75], OS, CSS, and CKD progression did not differ significantly between rMIPN and rMIRN (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>rMIPN provides oncologic and functional outcomes comparable to rMIRN but at the cost of higher perioperative morbidity. Surgical selection should be individualized, weighing the potential benefits of nephron preservation against the higher surgical risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147493926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-19DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111063
Andrew Harper, Momtafin Khan, Kellie R Imm, Robert L Grubb, Eric H Kim, Graham A Colditz, Kathleen Y Wolin, Adam S Kibel, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Lin Yang
Introduction: To examine the association of presurgical physical activity with urinary and sexual function following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Methods: Participants were recruited from 2011 to 2014 at 2 US institutions and provided self-reported urinary and sexual functions using the modified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC, scale from 0 to 100) at baseline (presurgery) and 5-week, 6-month, and 12-month after surgery. Moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) was assessed using the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors and classified into 3 categories. We evaluated changes in function pre- and postsurgery by linear generalized estimating equation (GEE) models and recovery in function after surgery by logistic GEE models.
Results: Among 401 eligible participants, 38.4%, 35.2% and 26.4% engaged in low, medium, and high MVPA before surgery. Urinary function did not vary by MVPA at baseline or during recovery. For sexual function, patients with high MVPA had better sexual function (p = 0.008) at baseline than those with low or medium levels of MVPA. During the recovery phase, this difference disappeared at 5-week postsurgery but returned by 6-month (p = 0.035) and persisted up to 12-month postsurgery (p = 0.004). A suggestive higher likelihood of sexual function recovery was observed by 12-month postsurgery among participants with high versus low MVPA (OR: 2.42; 95% CI: 0.96-6.08; p = 0.060).
Conclusion: Physically active prostate cancer patients had better sexual function before and after surgery, with a suggestive though statistically non-significant clinical recovery after surgery. These findings support the potential for exercise prehabilitation to improve side effects associated with radical prostatectomy.
{"title":"Association between presurgical physical activity and urinary and sexual function in prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Andrew Harper, Momtafin Khan, Kellie R Imm, Robert L Grubb, Eric H Kim, Graham A Colditz, Kathleen Y Wolin, Adam S Kibel, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Lin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To examine the association of presurgical physical activity with urinary and sexual function following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from 2011 to 2014 at 2 US institutions and provided self-reported urinary and sexual functions using the modified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC, scale from 0 to 100) at baseline (presurgery) and 5-week, 6-month, and 12-month after surgery. Moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) was assessed using the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors and classified into 3 categories. We evaluated changes in function pre- and postsurgery by linear generalized estimating equation (GEE) models and recovery in function after surgery by logistic GEE models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 401 eligible participants, 38.4%, 35.2% and 26.4% engaged in low, medium, and high MVPA before surgery. Urinary function did not vary by MVPA at baseline or during recovery. For sexual function, patients with high MVPA had better sexual function (p = 0.008) at baseline than those with low or medium levels of MVPA. During the recovery phase, this difference disappeared at 5-week postsurgery but returned by 6-month (p = 0.035) and persisted up to 12-month postsurgery (p = 0.004). A suggestive higher likelihood of sexual function recovery was observed by 12-month postsurgery among participants with high versus low MVPA (OR: 2.42; 95% CI: 0.96-6.08; p = 0.060).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physically active prostate cancer patients had better sexual function before and after surgery, with a suggestive though statistically non-significant clinical recovery after surgery. These findings support the potential for exercise prehabilitation to improve side effects associated with radical prostatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147491852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-14DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111060
Yepeng Guo, Zijian Cai, Antonio Augusto Ornellas, Christian Schwentner, Jiun-Hung Geng, Desi Chen, Gaowei Huang, Bonan Chen, Xueqi Zhang, Xin Jiang, Jingjin Liu, Yumeng Tang, Zhaohui Chen, Zaishang Li
Purpose: Currently, no standardized predictive model is widely adopted in clinical practice for assessing outcome and lymph node metastasis (LNM). This study aimed at predicting inguinal lymph node involvement and mortality in patients suffering penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) by developing a simple and clinically applicable scoring system.
Methods: Clinical and histopathological data from 11 centers, collected between 2000 and 2021, were reclassified (the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual). Data from 8 centers (517 patients) were randomized into training and internal validation cohorts (7:3), and data from the remaining 3 centers contributed 201 patients for external validation. A dual-outcome prediction model was established with univariate and multivariate logistic regression for LNM prediction, and Cox regression for outcome assessment. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn to estimate the disease-specific survival (DSS), alongside the log-rank test conducted on the difference in survival. Model performance was evaluated through the AUC, calibration plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, along with decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: The study enrolled 718 patients with penile cancer aged at 55 years (IQR: 46-65). Perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor grade and T stage were independently associated with both LNM and survival (all P < 0.05). For LNM prediction, the scoring system achieved AUCs of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.84), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.86) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.83) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. For 3-year DSS prediction, the time-dependent AUCs were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.91), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75-0.92), and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.94) in respective cohorts. The scoring system was adopted to categorize patients into different risk groups for both LNM and 3-year DSS (Log-rank P < 0.05). Calibration plots revealed a strong consistency between predicted and actual probabilities for both LNM and 3-year DSS across all cohorts. DCA confirmed the favorable predictive accuracy of the scoring system for both inguinal lymph node involvement and mortality in PSCC.
Conclusion: This simple scoring system demonstrates robust predictive accuracy for inguinal LNM and DSS in PSCC, which practically benefits the risk stratification and personalized management decisions in penile cancer care.
{"title":"A simple scoring system for predicting inguinal lymph node involvement and survival in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Yepeng Guo, Zijian Cai, Antonio Augusto Ornellas, Christian Schwentner, Jiun-Hung Geng, Desi Chen, Gaowei Huang, Bonan Chen, Xueqi Zhang, Xin Jiang, Jingjin Liu, Yumeng Tang, Zhaohui Chen, Zaishang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Currently, no standardized predictive model is widely adopted in clinical practice for assessing outcome and lymph node metastasis (LNM). This study aimed at predicting inguinal lymph node involvement and mortality in patients suffering penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) by developing a simple and clinically applicable scoring system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and histopathological data from 11 centers, collected between 2000 and 2021, were reclassified (the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual). Data from 8 centers (517 patients) were randomized into training and internal validation cohorts (7:3), and data from the remaining 3 centers contributed 201 patients for external validation. A dual-outcome prediction model was established with univariate and multivariate logistic regression for LNM prediction, and Cox regression for outcome assessment. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn to estimate the disease-specific survival (DSS), alongside the log-rank test conducted on the difference in survival. Model performance was evaluated through the AUC, calibration plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, along with decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 718 patients with penile cancer aged at 55 years (IQR: 46-65). Perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor grade and T stage were independently associated with both LNM and survival (all P < 0.05). For LNM prediction, the scoring system achieved AUCs of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.84), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.86) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.83) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. For 3-year DSS prediction, the time-dependent AUCs were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.91), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75-0.92), and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.94) in respective cohorts. The scoring system was adopted to categorize patients into different risk groups for both LNM and 3-year DSS (Log-rank P < 0.05). Calibration plots revealed a strong consistency between predicted and actual probabilities for both LNM and 3-year DSS across all cohorts. DCA confirmed the favorable predictive accuracy of the scoring system for both inguinal lymph node involvement and mortality in PSCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This simple scoring system demonstrates robust predictive accuracy for inguinal LNM and DSS in PSCC, which practically benefits the risk stratification and personalized management decisions in penile cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147463847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Over the past 2 decades, risk stratification in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has evolved considerably, progressing from simple clinico-pathologic scoring systems to sophisticated, molecular, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven frameworks. This review summarizes evidence from peer-reviewed studies that evaluate prognostic models incorporating clinical, pathological, molecular, radiomic, or AI-derived variables to predict recurrence, progression, or response to BCG. Although traditional models, such as the EORTC and CUETO tables, are widely used, they demonstrate modest discrimination and limited calibration in contemporary cohorts. Molecular systems, including the 12-gene PCR score and the UROMOL21 classifier, offer deeper biological insight and improved prognostic accuracy. However, they require specialized platforms and lack prospective demonstration of clinical utility. More recent AI-based approaches, including machine learning applied to clinico-pathologic data, deep learning from whole-slide images, and MRI radiomics, have been shown to consistently outperform historical risk tables. These approaches offer improved patient stratification. However, challenges remain regarding reproducibility, interpretability, and integration into clinical pathways. Overall, no single prognostic tool currently fulfills all criteria for broad adoption. Future progress will depend on the development of rigorously validated, multimodal models that integrate clinical, molecular, imaging, and digital pathology data to enable more precise surveillance and treatment decisions for patients with NMIBC.
{"title":"Refining prognostication in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: From clinical models to artificial intelligence.","authors":"Céline Mardelli, Théophile Bertail, Isamu Tachibana, Grégory Verhoest, Romain Mathieu, Benjamin Pradere, Evanguelos Xylinas, Morgan Roupret, Vitaly Margulis, Karim Bensalah, Yair Lotan, Zine-Eddine Khene","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past 2 decades, risk stratification in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has evolved considerably, progressing from simple clinico-pathologic scoring systems to sophisticated, molecular, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven frameworks. This review summarizes evidence from peer-reviewed studies that evaluate prognostic models incorporating clinical, pathological, molecular, radiomic, or AI-derived variables to predict recurrence, progression, or response to BCG. Although traditional models, such as the EORTC and CUETO tables, are widely used, they demonstrate modest discrimination and limited calibration in contemporary cohorts. Molecular systems, including the 12-gene PCR score and the UROMOL21 classifier, offer deeper biological insight and improved prognostic accuracy. However, they require specialized platforms and lack prospective demonstration of clinical utility. More recent AI-based approaches, including machine learning applied to clinico-pathologic data, deep learning from whole-slide images, and MRI radiomics, have been shown to consistently outperform historical risk tables. These approaches offer improved patient stratification. However, challenges remain regarding reproducibility, interpretability, and integration into clinical pathways. Overall, no single prognostic tool currently fulfills all criteria for broad adoption. Future progress will depend on the development of rigorously validated, multimodal models that integrate clinical, molecular, imaging, and digital pathology data to enable more precise surveillance and treatment decisions for patients with NMIBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147460465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-13DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111048
Bachviet Nguyen, Miles Mannas, Gurwinder Sidhu, Amandeep Ghuman, Astrid-Jane Williams
Prostate cancer is the fourth most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide. Since the inception of ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (IPAA) in 1978, the clinical situation of prostate cancer in the setting of an IPAA has arisen. We aimed to examine and synthesize the literature on oncologic, urologic and pouch outcomes after prostatectomy in patients with a pre-existing IPAA. We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar for studies published from inception to June 2025. Studies not written in English or unable to be accessed were excluded. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient demographics, surgical details, characteristics of prostate cancer, and treatment outcomes. Eight retrospective studies were included, consisting of 93 male patients with a median follow-up of 9 months (range 1-174 months) postprostatectomy. Prostate cancer grade group 2 disease was most common. Prostatic adhesions and scarring were frequently encountered during surgery. Normal pouch function was preserved in 83.9% (78/93) of patients following prostatectomy and pouch failure occurred in 5.4% of cases postoperatively (5/93). Erectile function and urinary continence were preserved in 62.5% (10/16) and 88.2% (30/34) of patients respectively at the time of last follow-up. Most patients did not experience biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (92.5%; 62/67). Prostatectomy can be considered when deciding to treat patients with a pre-existing IPAA who develop prostate cancer. There remains a need for prospective research to provide additional evidence on the effectiveness and safety of prostatectomies in this unique population.
{"title":"A systematic review of outcomes after prostatectomy in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.","authors":"Bachviet Nguyen, Miles Mannas, Gurwinder Sidhu, Amandeep Ghuman, Astrid-Jane Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer is the fourth most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide. Since the inception of ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (IPAA) in 1978, the clinical situation of prostate cancer in the setting of an IPAA has arisen. We aimed to examine and synthesize the literature on oncologic, urologic and pouch outcomes after prostatectomy in patients with a pre-existing IPAA. We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar for studies published from inception to June 2025. Studies not written in English or unable to be accessed were excluded. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient demographics, surgical details, characteristics of prostate cancer, and treatment outcomes. Eight retrospective studies were included, consisting of 93 male patients with a median follow-up of 9 months (range 1-174 months) postprostatectomy. Prostate cancer grade group 2 disease was most common. Prostatic adhesions and scarring were frequently encountered during surgery. Normal pouch function was preserved in 83.9% (78/93) of patients following prostatectomy and pouch failure occurred in 5.4% of cases postoperatively (5/93). Erectile function and urinary continence were preserved in 62.5% (10/16) and 88.2% (30/34) of patients respectively at the time of last follow-up. Most patients did not experience biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (92.5%; 62/67). Prostatectomy can be considered when deciding to treat patients with a pre-existing IPAA who develop prostate cancer. There remains a need for prospective research to provide additional evidence on the effectiveness and safety of prostatectomies in this unique population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147460391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-13DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111042
Parth U Thakker, Daniel Sidhom, Francis Asamoah, Cynthia Cahya, Kate Adaniya, Clint Cary, Timothy Masterson, David Agarwal, Omar Ishaq, Chandru Sundaram, Ronald Boris
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has increased in incidence due to the frequent cross-sectional imaging. While surgical extirpation is the standard of care, some patients are poor surgical candidates. For these patients, active surveillance is the most prudent choice, however, some patients desire treatment, nonetheless. Percutaneous ablation has been established as a reasonable alternative with acceptable oncologic efficacy and safety. Recent phase II trials have demonstrated the feasibility of sterotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for renal masses in nonsurgical candidates. To delineate which modality should be preferred as second-line therapy, we sought to compare the complication profile, renal function changes, and oncologic efficacy for both treatment options in nonsurgical candidates with localized RCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing percutaneous ablation or SABR for localized RCC from 2017 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were deemed nonoperative candidates at the discretion of the treatment team based on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA, and absolute requirement of anticoagulation or antiplatelet status. Primary outcomes were postprocedural complications. Secondary outcomes included renal/GI toxicities, renal function changes, progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Variables were compared using Wilcox-rank sum and Fischer's exact tests where applicable. Oncologic outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients underwent SABR, and 139 had percutaneous ablation of localized RCC. The median age (76 vs. 75 years, P = 0.77), body mass index (32.8 vs. 29.9, P = 0.39), and CCI (6 vs. 6, P = 0.59) were similar between the groups. Renal mass size was larger in the SABR group (4.3 vs. 2.4 cm, P < 0.01). The median radiation dose delivered was 42 Gy in 3 fractions. The SABR group (6/17) had a higher overall complication rate compared to the ablation group (18/139) (35.5% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.04), driven by mild gastrointestinal complications. No difference in median follow-up was found (18.6 vs. 20.6 months, P = 0.72). Grade 1 renal/GI toxicity occurred in 23.5% of SABR patients and 17.3% of ablation patients. No higher-grade toxicities were noted in either group. Grade 1 GI toxicity occurred in 3 (17.6%) patients, and grade 2 GI toxicity occurred in 1 (5.9%) patient in the thermal ablation group. The 2-year RFS (100% vs. 94%, P = 0.31) and PFS (100% vs. 96%, P = 0.43) were similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first single-center study evaluating the comparative efficacy of SABR and percutaneous ablation for RCC in nonsurgical candidates. While demonstrating a higher, albeit minor, complication rate and similar short-term oncologic outcomes, SABR appears to offer a feasible
目的:肾细胞癌(RCC)的诊断率随着横断显像的频繁而增加。虽然手术切除是标准的治疗方法,但有些患者不适合手术。对于这些患者,主动监测是最谨慎的选择,然而,一些患者仍然希望治疗。经皮消融术是一种合理的替代方法,具有可接受的肿瘤疗效和安全性。最近的II期试验已经证明了立体定向消融放疗(SABR)对非手术候选人肾肿块的可行性。为了确定哪一种治疗方式是首选的二线治疗,我们试图比较两种治疗方案对局限性肾细胞癌非手术患者的并发症、肾功能改变和肿瘤疗效。材料和方法:回顾性分析2017年至2023年接受经皮消融或SABR治疗局限性RCC的患者。根据Charlson合并症指数(CCI)、ASA和抗凝或抗血小板状态的绝对要求,治疗团队将所有患者视为非手术候选者。主要结局为术后并发症。次要结局包括肾/胃肠道毒性、肾功能改变、无进展生存期(PFS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。变量比较使用Wilcox-rank和和Fischer精确检验(如适用)。使用Kaplan-Meier分析确定肿瘤预后,并使用log-rank检验进行比较。结果:17例患者行SABR, 139例行局部RCC经皮消融术。两组患者的中位年龄(76岁比75岁,P = 0.77)、体重指数(32.8比29.9,P = 0.39)和CCI(6比6,P = 0.59)相似。SABR组肾肿块尺寸更大(4.3 vs 2.4 cm, P < 0.01)。中位放射剂量为42 Gy,分3次给予。由于轻微的胃肠道并发症,SABR组(6/17)的总并发症发生率高于消融组(18/139)(35.5% vs 12.9%, P = 0.04)。中位随访时间无差异(18.6个月vs 20.6个月,P = 0.72)。1级肾/胃肠道毒性发生在23.5%的SABR患者和17.3%的消融患者中。两组均未见更高级别的毒性反应。热消融组3例(17.6%)患者出现1级胃肠道毒性,1例(5.9%)患者出现2级胃肠道毒性。两组间2年RFS (100% vs 94%, P = 0.31)和PFS (100% vs 96%, P = 0.43)相似。结论:据我们所知,这是第一个评估SABR和经皮消融治疗RCC非手术患者比较疗效的单中心研究。虽然SABR的并发症发生率较高,但发生率较小,短期肿瘤预后相似,但SABR似乎是经皮消融的可行替代方案。SABR可能特别适用于不能耐受麻醉或需要体位的患者,那些肾肿块过大而不能消融的患者,以及那些肿瘤位置不利而不能消融的患者。
{"title":"Sterotactic ablative radiotherapy vs. thermal ablation of localized renal cell carcinoma: Is there a preferred second-line management option?","authors":"Parth U Thakker, Daniel Sidhom, Francis Asamoah, Cynthia Cahya, Kate Adaniya, Clint Cary, Timothy Masterson, David Agarwal, Omar Ishaq, Chandru Sundaram, Ronald Boris","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has increased in incidence due to the frequent cross-sectional imaging. While surgical extirpation is the standard of care, some patients are poor surgical candidates. For these patients, active surveillance is the most prudent choice, however, some patients desire treatment, nonetheless. Percutaneous ablation has been established as a reasonable alternative with acceptable oncologic efficacy and safety. Recent phase II trials have demonstrated the feasibility of sterotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for renal masses in nonsurgical candidates. To delineate which modality should be preferred as second-line therapy, we sought to compare the complication profile, renal function changes, and oncologic efficacy for both treatment options in nonsurgical candidates with localized RCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing percutaneous ablation or SABR for localized RCC from 2017 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were deemed nonoperative candidates at the discretion of the treatment team based on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA, and absolute requirement of anticoagulation or antiplatelet status. Primary outcomes were postprocedural complications. Secondary outcomes included renal/GI toxicities, renal function changes, progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Variables were compared using Wilcox-rank sum and Fischer's exact tests where applicable. Oncologic outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients underwent SABR, and 139 had percutaneous ablation of localized RCC. The median age (76 vs. 75 years, P = 0.77), body mass index (32.8 vs. 29.9, P = 0.39), and CCI (6 vs. 6, P = 0.59) were similar between the groups. Renal mass size was larger in the SABR group (4.3 vs. 2.4 cm, P < 0.01). The median radiation dose delivered was 42 Gy in 3 fractions. The SABR group (6/17) had a higher overall complication rate compared to the ablation group (18/139) (35.5% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.04), driven by mild gastrointestinal complications. No difference in median follow-up was found (18.6 vs. 20.6 months, P = 0.72). Grade 1 renal/GI toxicity occurred in 23.5% of SABR patients and 17.3% of ablation patients. No higher-grade toxicities were noted in either group. Grade 1 GI toxicity occurred in 3 (17.6%) patients, and grade 2 GI toxicity occurred in 1 (5.9%) patient in the thermal ablation group. The 2-year RFS (100% vs. 94%, P = 0.31) and PFS (100% vs. 96%, P = 0.43) were similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first single-center study evaluating the comparative efficacy of SABR and percutaneous ablation for RCC in nonsurgical candidates. While demonstrating a higher, albeit minor, complication rate and similar short-term oncologic outcomes, SABR appears to offer a feasible ","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147459425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111050
Kishankumar Mahida, Snehal Rajendra Jagtap
{"title":"Comment on \"Surgical operation duration as a predictor of venous thromboembolism risk after radical cystectomy\".","authors":"Kishankumar Mahida, Snehal Rajendra Jagtap","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.111050","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":"111050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147370125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}