{"title":"Comment on \"Global, regional, and National lifetime risks of developing and dying from urolithiasis: a population-based systematic analysis from 1990 to 2021\".","authors":"Zhe Li, YuXin Zhu, ShengJie Wang, WenJun Li, YiFei Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01888-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01888-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145452891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01886-y
Hüsnü Tokgöz, Özlem Tokgöz
{"title":"Comment on: The effect of endoscopic renal and ureteral stone surgeries on renal blood flow in children: a prospective trial.","authors":"Hüsnü Tokgöz, Özlem Tokgöz","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01886-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01886-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145439172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01884-0
Wen Shi, Enhui Chen, Dongrong Yu
{"title":"Letter to the editor: variants of unknown significance are common in brushite stone formers undergoing genetic testing for nephrolithiasis.","authors":"Wen Shi, Enhui Chen, Dongrong Yu","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01884-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01884-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145439164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01879-x
S O'Meara, P Rohan, O Cullivan, F J O'Brien, A O'Shea, N F Davis
Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is a mainstay in the diagnosis of urolithiasis, with multiple markers on NCCT used to predict the likelihood of stone passage and to assist in pre-operative planning. Ureter wall thickness (UWT) is one such parameter, however studies evaluating inter-observer agreement and comparing to native ureteral tissue are lacking. We aim to provide the first comparison of UWT from healthy human ureters with UWT measured on NCCT; and to evaluate for inter-observer variability on NCCT measurement. Human ureters were collected from consenting adults at the time of radical nephrectomy. The pathological UWT (pUWT) was compared to the median radiological UWT (rUWT) of three independent blinded observers. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test, intraclass correlation co-efficient and Bland-Altmann analysis. Samples from 23 patients were compared with a mean pUWt 2.1mm (range: 0.89-4.11mm) and rUWT of 1.30mm (range: 1-3.52mm). There was significant variation between median rUWT and pUWT (1.3mm vs 2.1mm, p=0.0005) with rUWT underestimating pUWT by a mean of 0.72mm. The intraclass correlation co-efficient of <0.50 suggests poor intra-reader reliability with limits of agreement on Bland-Altmann analysis of 2.5mm. This study represents the first comparison of pathological and radiological UWT in human ureteric tissue. There is a significant variation in pathological and radiological measurements, with high interobserver variability.
非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)是诊断尿石症的主要方法,NCCT上的多个标记物用于预测结石通过的可能性并协助术前计划。输尿管壁厚度(UWT)就是这样一个参数,然而评估观察者间一致性和比较输尿管原生组织的研究缺乏。我们的目标是提供健康人类输尿管UWT与NCCT测量的UWT的首次比较;并评估NCCT测量的观察者间变异性。人类输尿管收集自同意的成年人在根治性肾切除术时。将病理学UWT (pUWT)与三位独立盲法观察者的中位放射UWT (rUWT)进行比较。统计学分析采用Wilcoxon配对对符号秩检验、类内相关系数和Bland-Altmann分析。23例患者的平均pUWt为2.1mm(范围:0.89-4.11mm), rUWT为1.30mm(范围:1-3.52mm)。中位rUWT和pUWT之间存在显著差异(1.3mm vs 2.1mm, p=0.0005), rUWT平均低估pUWT 0.72mm。的类内相关系数
{"title":"Pathological and radiological evaluation of ureteral wall thickness measurement in urolithiasis.","authors":"S O'Meara, P Rohan, O Cullivan, F J O'Brien, A O'Shea, N F Davis","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01879-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01879-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is a mainstay in the diagnosis of urolithiasis, with multiple markers on NCCT used to predict the likelihood of stone passage and to assist in pre-operative planning. Ureter wall thickness (UWT) is one such parameter, however studies evaluating inter-observer agreement and comparing to native ureteral tissue are lacking. We aim to provide the first comparison of UWT from healthy human ureters with UWT measured on NCCT; and to evaluate for inter-observer variability on NCCT measurement. Human ureters were collected from consenting adults at the time of radical nephrectomy. The pathological UWT (pUWT) was compared to the median radiological UWT (rUWT) of three independent blinded observers. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test, intraclass correlation co-efficient and Bland-Altmann analysis. Samples from 23 patients were compared with a mean pUWt 2.1mm (range: 0.89-4.11mm) and rUWT of 1.30mm (range: 1-3.52mm). There was significant variation between median rUWT and pUWT (1.3mm vs 2.1mm, p=0.0005) with rUWT underestimating pUWT by a mean of 0.72mm. The intraclass correlation co-efficient of <0.50 suggests poor intra-reader reliability with limits of agreement on Bland-Altmann analysis of 2.5mm. This study represents the first comparison of pathological and radiological UWT in human ureteric tissue. There is a significant variation in pathological and radiological measurements, with high interobserver variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145427135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Brushite nephrolithiasis and the overinterpretation of genetic variants.","authors":"Noor-Ul-Eman Haider, Mehwish Amjad, Talha Imran, Aashir Bin Asad, Sadaf Khan","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01882-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01882-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145422750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01871-5
Mert Başaranoğlu, Oktay Kuş, Mesut Tek, Erdem Akbay
This prospective study evaluated the impact of normalized energy utilization on clinical outcomes and complications in endourological stone surgery. Between January 2024 and April 2025, 478 consecutive patients undergoing holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy were enrolled. Stone characteristics, energy parameters, operative outcomes, and complications were prospectively recorded. Normalized energy values (J/mm³) were calculated as total energy divided by stone volume. The primary endpoint was complication development. Mean normalized energy was 22.5 ± 13.1 J/mm³ (range: 5.8-72.4). High-density stones (> 1000 HU) and lower calyceal locations required significantly higher energy (p < 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively). ROC analysis identified 25 J/mm³ as the optimal threshold for predicting complications (AUC = 0.792, sensitivity 75.8%, specificity 70.5%). Energy utilization above 25 J/mm³ increased complication risk 4.25-fold (95% CI: 2.05-8.82, p < 0.001), while energy above 30 J/mm³ significantly increased severe papillary damage risk (68.5% vs. 25.3%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, normalized energy > 25 J/mm³ (OR: 4.25, p < 0.001), prolonged operative time (OR: 1.02, p = 0.018), and high stone density (OR: 2.54, p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for complications. Overall stone-free rate was 83.7%. This study establishes evidence-based energy thresholds for safe laser lithotripsy, demonstrating that normalized energy monitoring can guide surgical decision-making and reduce complications in endourological stone surgery.
本前瞻性研究评估了规范化能量利用对泌尿道结石手术临床结果和并发症的影响。在2024年1月至2025年4月期间,478名连续接受钬激光碎石术的患者入组。前瞻性记录结石特征、能量参数、手术结果和并发症。归一化能量值(J/mm³)计算为总能量除以石材体积。主要终点是并发症的发生。平均归一化能量为22.5±13.1 J/mm³(范围:5.8-72.4)。高密度结石(bbb1000 HU)和较低的萼部位置需要明显更高的能量(p 25 J/mm³)(OR: 4.25, p
{"title":"The impact of normalized energy utilization on clinical outcomes and complications in endourological stone surgery: a prospective study.","authors":"Mert Başaranoğlu, Oktay Kuş, Mesut Tek, Erdem Akbay","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01871-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01871-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective study evaluated the impact of normalized energy utilization on clinical outcomes and complications in endourological stone surgery. Between January 2024 and April 2025, 478 consecutive patients undergoing holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy were enrolled. Stone characteristics, energy parameters, operative outcomes, and complications were prospectively recorded. Normalized energy values (J/mm³) were calculated as total energy divided by stone volume. The primary endpoint was complication development. Mean normalized energy was 22.5 ± 13.1 J/mm³ (range: 5.8-72.4). High-density stones (> 1000 HU) and lower calyceal locations required significantly higher energy (p < 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively). ROC analysis identified 25 J/mm³ as the optimal threshold for predicting complications (AUC = 0.792, sensitivity 75.8%, specificity 70.5%). Energy utilization above 25 J/mm³ increased complication risk 4.25-fold (95% CI: 2.05-8.82, p < 0.001), while energy above 30 J/mm³ significantly increased severe papillary damage risk (68.5% vs. 25.3%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, normalized energy > 25 J/mm³ (OR: 4.25, p < 0.001), prolonged operative time (OR: 1.02, p = 0.018), and high stone density (OR: 2.54, p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for complications. Overall stone-free rate was 83.7%. This study establishes evidence-based energy thresholds for safe laser lithotripsy, demonstrating that normalized energy monitoring can guide surgical decision-making and reduce complications in endourological stone surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145410190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Age-dependent predictive limitations of the MAP score in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Serkan Gonultas, Sina Kardas, Mucahit Gelmis, Dogan Altay, Okan Gurkan, Burak Arslan","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01867-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01867-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145378830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-27DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01881-3
Taylor Crook, Ian Ong, Yezan Hadidi, Aymon Ali, John M Hollingsworth, Mary K Oerline, Vahakn B Shahinian, Sara Best, Ryan S Hsi, Joseph J Crivelli, Ralph V Clayman
This retrospective study investigated the impact of metformin initiation on 24-hour urine parameters in patients with diabetes with urolithiasis. Utilizing the Medicare-Litholink database, we analyzed 427 patients who started metformin between two 24-hour urine collections conducted less than 18 months apart. To isolate the effect of metformin on urinary parameters as a surrogate marker of stone growth, we excluded patients taking other oral hypoglycemics or medications known to alter urine composition. Our longitudinal analysis revealed no statistically significant changes in key urinary parameters, including supersaturation of calcium oxalate, supersaturation calcium phosphate, and supersaturation of uric acid. Urine volume showed a significant, albeit clinically minor, increase (2.1 to 2.2 L/day, p = 0.0074). Time-dependent analysis comparing short-term (< 100 days) and long-term (> 296 days) metformin use also showed no significant impact on urine chemistry. Similarly, when controlling dosage of metformin ([Formula: see text]1000 mg/day or > 1000 mg/day) we found no significant impact on urine chemistry. These findings suggest that metformin use is not significantly associated with reduced urinary stone risk factors in patients with diabetes and urolithiasis, thus, failing to support its use among urolithiasis patients with new onset diabetes.
{"title":"Comparison of 24-Hour urine parameters before and after initiation of Metformin in patients with diabetes and urolithiasis: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Taylor Crook, Ian Ong, Yezan Hadidi, Aymon Ali, John M Hollingsworth, Mary K Oerline, Vahakn B Shahinian, Sara Best, Ryan S Hsi, Joseph J Crivelli, Ralph V Clayman","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01881-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01881-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study investigated the impact of metformin initiation on 24-hour urine parameters in patients with diabetes with urolithiasis. Utilizing the Medicare-Litholink database, we analyzed 427 patients who started metformin between two 24-hour urine collections conducted less than 18 months apart. To isolate the effect of metformin on urinary parameters as a surrogate marker of stone growth, we excluded patients taking other oral hypoglycemics or medications known to alter urine composition. Our longitudinal analysis revealed no statistically significant changes in key urinary parameters, including supersaturation of calcium oxalate, supersaturation calcium phosphate, and supersaturation of uric acid. Urine volume showed a significant, albeit clinically minor, increase (2.1 to 2.2 L/day, p = 0.0074). Time-dependent analysis comparing short-term (< 100 days) and long-term (> 296 days) metformin use also showed no significant impact on urine chemistry. Similarly, when controlling dosage of metformin ([Formula: see text]1000 mg/day or > 1000 mg/day) we found no significant impact on urine chemistry. These findings suggest that metformin use is not significantly associated with reduced urinary stone risk factors in patients with diabetes and urolithiasis, thus, failing to support its use among urolithiasis patients with new onset diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559097/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145378962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Construction and validation of a nomogram to predict urosepsis in patients with symptomatic ureterolithiasis after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.","authors":"Qiao Qi, Jie Yu, Shuchen Liu, Yuexian Xu, Qingfeng Huang, Zongyao Hao","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01853-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01853-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145368788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01878-y
Cem Tuğrul Gezmiş, Nusret Can Çilesiz, Serdar Turan, Mustafa Satılmışoğlu, Ali Eroğlu, Mustafa Bahadır Can Balcı
This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) success in patients with proximal ureteral stones. We retrospectively analyzed 216 patients who underwent ESWL for isolated proximal ureteral stones between March 2020 and May 2025. Demographic and radiological parameters, including stone size, stone density, skin-to-stone distance, and MAP score, were recorded. The MAP score was calculated using non-contrast computed tomography by assessing posterior perinephric fat thickness and perinephric fat stranding. Treatment success was defined as no ureteral stone; residual fragments ≤ 4 mm were permitted only if located in the kidney after the ESWL procedure at 3-month follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of ESWL success. The overall ESWL success rate was 63%. Patients with a MAP score < 3 achieved significantly higher success rates than those with a MAP score ≥ 3 (76.9% vs. 45.3%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, stone size > 10 mm (odds ratio [OR] 0.340, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.179-0.647), MAP score ≥ 3 (OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.140-0.507), and a prolonged interval between computed tomography and ESWL (OR 0.956, 95% CI 0.927-0.985) were identified as independent predictors of reduced success. A higher MAP score, larger stone size, and longer pre-treatment interval are associated with lower ESWL success in proximal ureteral stones. MAP scoring provides a simple, reproducible, imaging-based tool that may assist in patient selection and support treatment planning.
本研究旨在评估Mayo粘连概率(MAP)评分对输尿管近端结石患者体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)成功的预测价值。我们回顾性分析了2020年3月至2025年5月期间接受ESWL治疗孤立性输尿管近端结石的216例患者。记录人口统计学和放射学参数,包括结石大小、结石密度、皮肤到结石的距离和MAP评分。MAP评分采用非对比计算机断层扫描,通过评估后肾周脂肪厚度和肾周脂肪搁浅来计算。治疗成功定义为无输尿管结石;在3个月的随访中,ESWL手术后仅允许在肾脏中发现≤4 mm的残留碎片。进行逻辑回归分析以确定ESWL成功的独立预测因素。ESWL总体成功率为63%。MAP评分为10 mm(优势比[OR] 0.340, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.179-0.647)、MAP评分≥3 (OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.140-0.507)、计算机断层扫描和ESWL间隔时间过长(OR 0.956, 95% CI 0.927-0.985)的患者被确定为降低成功率的独立预测因素。较高的MAP评分、较大的结石大小和较长的预处理间隔与输尿管近端结石ESWL成功率较低相关。MAP评分提供了一个简单的、可重复的、基于成像的工具,可以帮助患者选择和支持治疗计划。
{"title":"Impact of the Mayo adhesive probability score on ESWL outcomes for proximal ureteral stones.","authors":"Cem Tuğrul Gezmiş, Nusret Can Çilesiz, Serdar Turan, Mustafa Satılmışoğlu, Ali Eroğlu, Mustafa Bahadır Can Balcı","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01878-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00240-025-01878-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) success in patients with proximal ureteral stones. We retrospectively analyzed 216 patients who underwent ESWL for isolated proximal ureteral stones between March 2020 and May 2025. Demographic and radiological parameters, including stone size, stone density, skin-to-stone distance, and MAP score, were recorded. The MAP score was calculated using non-contrast computed tomography by assessing posterior perinephric fat thickness and perinephric fat stranding. Treatment success was defined as no ureteral stone; residual fragments ≤ 4 mm were permitted only if located in the kidney after the ESWL procedure at 3-month follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of ESWL success. The overall ESWL success rate was 63%. Patients with a MAP score < 3 achieved significantly higher success rates than those with a MAP score ≥ 3 (76.9% vs. 45.3%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, stone size > 10 mm (odds ratio [OR] 0.340, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.179-0.647), MAP score ≥ 3 (OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.140-0.507), and a prolonged interval between computed tomography and ESWL (OR 0.956, 95% CI 0.927-0.985) were identified as independent predictors of reduced success. A higher MAP score, larger stone size, and longer pre-treatment interval are associated with lower ESWL success in proximal ureteral stones. MAP scoring provides a simple, reproducible, imaging-based tool that may assist in patient selection and support treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145347550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}