Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-30DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70115
Md Moniruzzaman, Ayesha Shah, Thomas Fairlie, Simon Keely, Grace L Burns, Nicholas Talley, Gerald Holtmann
Background and objectives: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic liver disease with aberrant immune dysregulation and bile duct fibrosis. It is often associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially ulcerative colitis, raising questions about distinct immune activation in these conditions. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review and compare immune activation patterns in patients with PSC and IBD (without PSC), which may provide deeper insights into PSC pathophysiology.
Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched until July 2024 for relevant studies reporting immune cell profiles, cytokine levels, and gene expression patterns in patients with PSC. Reference articles of patients with IBD were then added to compare the immune profile of patients with PSC (with or without IBD) and patients with IBD-only.
Results: Twenty-three articles studying 638 PSC and 557 non-PSC non-IBD subjects were included. PSC patients showed various degrees of immune activation in the systemic circulation, biliary fluid, and liver tissue, most notably regarding integrin β7+ gut-homing T cells, IL-2, and IL-10 compared to their respective controls. Compared with patients with IBD, patients with PSC had reduced Tregs in the systemic circulation. When comparing tissue-based immune markers, PSC-livers had increased Th17 cells, IL-1β, and TNF-α and reduced levels of B cells, IL-2, and IL-10 than the IBD-mucosa.
Conclusions: Patients with PSC and patients with IBD without PSC can be differentiated by a distinct immune activation pattern with upregulation of Th17 and downregulation of Treg functions in PSC while other immune parameters do not allow a differentiation of these conditions.
{"title":"Immune Activation in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Review and Comparative Analysis With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.","authors":"Md Moniruzzaman, Ayesha Shah, Thomas Fairlie, Simon Keely, Grace L Burns, Nicholas Talley, Gerald Holtmann","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70115","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic liver disease with aberrant immune dysregulation and bile duct fibrosis. It is often associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially ulcerative colitis, raising questions about distinct immune activation in these conditions. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review and compare immune activation patterns in patients with PSC and IBD (without PSC), which may provide deeper insights into PSC pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched until July 2024 for relevant studies reporting immune cell profiles, cytokine levels, and gene expression patterns in patients with PSC. Reference articles of patients with IBD were then added to compare the immune profile of patients with PSC (with or without IBD) and patients with IBD-only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three articles studying 638 PSC and 557 non-PSC non-IBD subjects were included. PSC patients showed various degrees of immune activation in the systemic circulation, biliary fluid, and liver tissue, most notably regarding integrin β7+ gut-homing T cells, IL-2, and IL-10 compared to their respective controls. Compared with patients with IBD, patients with PSC had reduced Tregs in the systemic circulation. When comparing tissue-based immune markers, PSC-livers had increased Th17 cells, IL-1β, and TNF-α and reduced levels of B cells, IL-2, and IL-10 than the IBD-mucosa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with PSC and patients with IBD without PSC can be differentiated by a distinct immune activation pattern with upregulation of Th17 and downregulation of Treg functions in PSC while other immune parameters do not allow a differentiation of these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1740-1753"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12605952/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70111
Robert C Verdonk
{"title":"Acute Biliary Pancreatitis During Pregnancy: Time to Step Up Our Efforts!","authors":"Robert C Verdonk","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70111","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70111","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1674-1675"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606044/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145259195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-07DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70092
Maya Granot, Uri Kopylov, Yael Talmor, Nurit Nachum, Alexander Krauthammer, Tal Berger, Chaya Mushka Abitbol, Arad Dotan, Elhanan Borenstein, Shomron Ben-Horin, Batia Weiss, Yael Haberman
Background and aims: Elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients (age ≥ 60 at diagnosis) have unique characteristics that require special consideration. Using a real-life registry-based cohort, we compared disease phenotypes and treatment exposures between adult-onset (18 ≤ age < 60 years) and elderly-onset IBD patients.
Methods: Demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment were compared between adult- and elderly-onset IBD patients diagnosed during 2000-2022 with ≥ 12 months follow-up.
Results: Of 3307 adult IBD patients, 290 (9%) were elderly-onset. This group exhibited a higher prevalence of colon-only involvement, with higher rates of ulcerative colitis (UC, 38.3% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.02) and more colonic L2 Crohn's Disease (CD, 21% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) then adult-onset group. Elderly-onset CD also showed less ileocolonic L3 disease (14% vs. 29%, p < 0.001), less penetrating B3 phenotype (7.4% vs. 19%, p < 0.001), and less perianal involvement (10% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Elderly-onset CD and UC patients received more 5-ASA (36% vs. 17%, p < 0.001 in CD and 75% vs. 63%, p = 0.02 in UC). In contrast, these patients were exposed to considerably less biologics and/or JAK inhibitors (37% vs. 56% for CD and 20% vs. 35% for UC, p < 0.001), with higher 15-year biologic-free survival among elderly-onset IBD. First-line biological choices also substantially differed, with adult-onset receiving more anti-TNFs and elderly-onset receiving more Vedolizumab. We did not observe higher rates of IBD-related surgeries and steroid use between the groups.
Conclusions: Elderly-onset IBD shows higher prevalences of colon-only IBD (UC and L2 CD). Treatment strategies in elderly-onset IBD favor 5-ASA and show reduced biological use, with preferences for Vedolizumab over anti-TNFs.
{"title":"Elderly-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease Has Distinct Disease Characteristics and Treatment Patterns.","authors":"Maya Granot, Uri Kopylov, Yael Talmor, Nurit Nachum, Alexander Krauthammer, Tal Berger, Chaya Mushka Abitbol, Arad Dotan, Elhanan Borenstein, Shomron Ben-Horin, Batia Weiss, Yael Haberman","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70092","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients (age ≥ 60 at diagnosis) have unique characteristics that require special consideration. Using a real-life registry-based cohort, we compared disease phenotypes and treatment exposures between adult-onset (18 ≤ age < 60 years) and elderly-onset IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment were compared between adult- and elderly-onset IBD patients diagnosed during 2000-2022 with ≥ 12 months follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3307 adult IBD patients, 290 (9%) were elderly-onset. This group exhibited a higher prevalence of colon-only involvement, with higher rates of ulcerative colitis (UC, 38.3% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.02) and more colonic L2 Crohn's Disease (CD, 21% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) then adult-onset group. Elderly-onset CD also showed less ileocolonic L3 disease (14% vs. 29%, p < 0.001), less penetrating B3 phenotype (7.4% vs. 19%, p < 0.001), and less perianal involvement (10% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Elderly-onset CD and UC patients received more 5-ASA (36% vs. 17%, p < 0.001 in CD and 75% vs. 63%, p = 0.02 in UC). In contrast, these patients were exposed to considerably less biologics and/or JAK inhibitors (37% vs. 56% for CD and 20% vs. 35% for UC, p < 0.001), with higher 15-year biologic-free survival among elderly-onset IBD. First-line biological choices also substantially differed, with adult-onset receiving more anti-TNFs and elderly-onset receiving more Vedolizumab. We did not observe higher rates of IBD-related surgeries and steroid use between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly-onset IBD shows higher prevalences of colon-only IBD (UC and L2 CD). Treatment strategies in elderly-onset IBD favor 5-ASA and show reduced biological use, with preferences for Vedolizumab over anti-TNFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1754-1764"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606012/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144800395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-08DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70107
Francesca Manza, Mohamed G Shiha, Martina Müller, Reena Sidhu
{"title":"Waiting for Perfection or Acting on Reality? Burnout in Gastroenterology Needs Action Now.","authors":"Francesca Manza, Mohamed G Shiha, Martina Müller, Reena Sidhu","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70107","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70107","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1840-1841"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12605946/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145024281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-06DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70108
Juha Taavela, Mohamed G Shiha
{"title":"Abdominal Bloating and Distension: Common Symptoms but Limited Evidence.","authors":"Juha Taavela, Mohamed G Shiha","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70108","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70108","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1668-1669"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606036/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145008478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-21DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70123
Enrico Palmeri, Sebastian Stefanovic, Emine Gökce, Velio Ascenti, Andrea Anderloni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Frédéric Prat, George Webster, Deepak Joshi, Jonathan Potts, Terence Wong, Kofi Oppong, Martin James, Matthew Huggett, Jim Portal, Pieter Jan de Jonge, Mark Ellrichmann, Juan J Vila, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Wim Laleman, Jan Werner Poley, Petko Karagyozov, Frans van der Heide, Jan J Koornstra, Emad S Aljahdli, Christian Gerges, Rogier P Voermans, George Goodchild, Akin Inderson, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Marco J Bruno, David M de Jong, Pieter Hindryckx
Background and aim: Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication-specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy.
Methods: Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre-procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds.
Results: Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty-two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted.
Conclusion: Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.
{"title":"European Consensus Recommendations for Direct Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy Using a Modified Delphi Process.","authors":"Enrico Palmeri, Sebastian Stefanovic, Emine Gökce, Velio Ascenti, Andrea Anderloni, Vincenzo Cennamo, Frédéric Prat, George Webster, Deepak Joshi, Jonathan Potts, Terence Wong, Kofi Oppong, Martin James, Matthew Huggett, Jim Portal, Pieter Jan de Jonge, Mark Ellrichmann, Juan J Vila, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Wim Laleman, Jan Werner Poley, Petko Karagyozov, Frans van der Heide, Jan J Koornstra, Emad S Aljahdli, Christian Gerges, Rogier P Voermans, George Goodchild, Akin Inderson, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Marco J Bruno, David M de Jong, Pieter Hindryckx","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70123","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication-specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre-procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty-two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication-specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1652-1667"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606045/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145337669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-05DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70105
Jee Hoon Kim, Kyuho Lee, Sung Jin Lee, Galam Leem, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Namo Kim, Moon Jae Chung
Background: Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.
Objective: We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.
Methods: Patients scheduled for ERCP were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or the propofol group. They received 0.1 mg kg-1 remimazolam or 1.0 mg kg-1 propofol, with bolus injections of either 2 mg remimazolam or 20 mg propofol added as required, according to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen reserve depletion, defined as an ORi reduction to 0.00.
Results: Among the 102 patients, oxygen reserve depletion was more frequent in the propofol group (70.6% vs. 41.2%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003). The time from sedative injection to endoscope insertion, length of stay in the recovery room, and overall procedure time were comparable between the groups. Patients in the remimazolam group reported a lower incidence of procedural recall, fewer complaints of inadequate sedation, and higher satisfaction scores than those in the propofol group.
Conclusions: Remimazolam effectively preserved the oxygen reserve compared with propofol, lowering the risk of hypoxia during sedation. Remimazolam was also associated with more favorable recovery profiles for patients undergoing ERCP, making it a safe and preferred sedative for this procedure.
{"title":"Remimazolam Preserves Oxygen Reserve and Improves Sedation Safety Compared to Propofol in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.","authors":"Jee Hoon Kim, Kyuho Lee, Sung Jin Lee, Galam Leem, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Namo Kim, Moon Jae Chung","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70105","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for ERCP were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or the propofol group. They received 0.1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> remimazolam or 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol, with bolus injections of either 2 mg remimazolam or 20 mg propofol added as required, according to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen reserve depletion, defined as an ORi reduction to 0.00.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 102 patients, oxygen reserve depletion was more frequent in the propofol group (70.6% vs. 41.2%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003). The time from sedative injection to endoscope insertion, length of stay in the recovery room, and overall procedure time were comparable between the groups. Patients in the remimazolam group reported a lower incidence of procedural recall, fewer complaints of inadequate sedation, and higher satisfaction scores than those in the propofol group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam effectively preserved the oxygen reserve compared with propofol, lowering the risk of hypoxia during sedation. Remimazolam was also associated with more favorable recovery profiles for patients undergoing ERCP, making it a safe and preferred sedative for this procedure.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06359834.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1730-1739"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606023/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145006689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70118
Martin Lovecek, Esra Dirimtekin, Ingrid Garajová, Giulia Gasparini, Stefano Crippa, Elisa Giovannetti, Dana Sochorova, Carmen Mota Reyes, Ihsan Ekin Demir, Pinar Uysal-Onganer
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, mainly due to its aggressive nature, early metastasis, diagnosis at late stages, and limited response to systemic anticancer therapy. Perineural invasion (PNI), defined as the infiltration of neoplastic cells along nerve fibers and within nerve sheaths, is emerging as a critical determinant of PDAC aggressiveness. This position paper by the TRANSPAN PNI Group on Perineural Invasion synthesizes current evidence on the molecular features and clinical implications of PNI in PDAC, compares its prognostic significance in other malignancies, and describes novel biomarker strategies including potential therapeutic interventions.
{"title":"Perineural Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Recapitulating Its Importance and Defining Future Directions.","authors":"Martin Lovecek, Esra Dirimtekin, Ingrid Garajová, Giulia Gasparini, Stefano Crippa, Elisa Giovannetti, Dana Sochorova, Carmen Mota Reyes, Ihsan Ekin Demir, Pinar Uysal-Onganer","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70118","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, mainly due to its aggressive nature, early metastasis, diagnosis at late stages, and limited response to systemic anticancer therapy. Perineural invasion (PNI), defined as the infiltration of neoplastic cells along nerve fibers and within nerve sheaths, is emerging as a critical determinant of PDAC aggressiveness. This position paper by the TRANSPAN PNI Group on Perineural Invasion synthesizes current evidence on the molecular features and clinical implications of PNI in PDAC, compares its prognostic significance in other malignancies, and describes novel biomarker strategies including potential therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1678-1689"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606004/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145114294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-04DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70121
Dorottya Tarján, Eszter Ágnes Szalai, Bálint Erőss, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Vasile Liviu Drug, Serge Chooklin, Michael Hirth, Gabriel Sandblom, Vanessa Sandblom, Åsa Edergren, Ahmed Tlili, Sami Fendri, Simon Sirtl, Daniel de la Iglesia Gracía, Floreta Kurti, Dong Wu, Adriana Gherbon, Łukasz Nawacki, Alexandru Constantinescu, Natalia V Shirinskaya, Alexander N Zolotov, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Tsukasa Ikeura, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Louise Rasmussen, Bodil Andersson, Ahmed Bouzid, Ahmed Saidani, Nándor Ács, Zoltán Sipos, Nelli Farkas, Balázs Tihanyi, Brigitta Teutsch, Johan Nilsson, Alexandra Mikó, Péter Hegyi
Background: Biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) during pregnancy is a challenging situation, and current guidelines for AP, pregnancy care, and surgery do not specifically address its management. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy in AP.
Methods: This international retrospective multicenter cohort study encompassed questions related to demographic information, clinical presentation, management strategies, timing of cholecystectomy, approaches to the procedure, complications, and outcomes. Continuous variables were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons used Welch's t-test, Pearson's chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests.
Results: A total of 101 cases from 14 countries and 19 centers were enrolled. Cholecystectomy after mild AP during pregnancy had a lower rate of readmission due to recurrent AP or other gallstone-related complications compared with those who did not undergo surgery after a mild AP during pregnancy (0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027). Cholecystectomy performed during pregnancy was associated with a low surgical complication rate, identical to that seen in postpartum procedures (12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999). Preterm birth occurred in 7.1% (n = 1/14) of patients with cholecystectomy versus 11% (n = 5/45) without. Fetal loss after surgery occurred only in the first trimester (n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49). No difference was seen in readmission (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138), fetal loss (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138) and preterm birth (6%, n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p > 0.999) between the surgical and ERCP groups. The fetal loss (9.1%, n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618) and preterm birth rates (5.9%, n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677) did not significantly differ between patients with and without ERCP during pregnancy.
Conclusion: Cholecystectomy is effective and safe in pregnant patients during the second or third trimester in cases of mild biliary pancreatitis. ERCP is safe in any trimester.
背景:妊娠期胆道性急性胰腺炎(AP)是一个具有挑战性的情况,目前的AP、妊娠护理和手术指南没有专门针对其管理。本研究调查了ap妊娠期胆囊切除术和内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的安全性和有效性。方法:这项国际回顾性多中心队列研究包括与人口统计学信息、临床表现、管理策略、胆囊切除术时机、手术方法、并发症和结局相关的问题。连续变量概括为四分位数范围的中位数,分类变量概括为频率和百分比。组间比较采用韦尔奇t检验、皮尔逊卡方检验或费雪精确检验。结果:共有来自14个国家19个中心的101例病例入组。与妊娠期轻度AP后未行手术的患者相比,妊娠期轻度AP后行胆囊切除术的患者因复发性AP或其他胆结石相关并发症再入院率较低(0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027)。妊娠期胆囊切除术的手术并发症发生率较低,与产后手术相同(12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999)。早产儿发生率为7.1% (n = 1/14),而未行胆囊切除术的早产儿发生率为11% (n = 5/45)。手术后胎儿丢失仅发生在妊娠早期(n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49)。手术组和ERCP组在再入院(5%,n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138)、胎儿丢失(5%,n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138)和早产(6%,n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p = 0.0.999)方面均无差异。妊娠期有无ERCP患者的胎儿丢失(9.1%,n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618)和早产率(5.9%,n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677)无显著差异。结论:对妊娠中晚期轻度胆源性胰腺炎患者行胆囊切除术是安全有效的。ERCP在任何妊娠期都是安全的。
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Cholecystectomy and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Biliary Pancreatitis During Pregnancy: BORN Study.","authors":"Dorottya Tarján, Eszter Ágnes Szalai, Bálint Erőss, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Vasile Liviu Drug, Serge Chooklin, Michael Hirth, Gabriel Sandblom, Vanessa Sandblom, Åsa Edergren, Ahmed Tlili, Sami Fendri, Simon Sirtl, Daniel de la Iglesia Gracía, Floreta Kurti, Dong Wu, Adriana Gherbon, Łukasz Nawacki, Alexandru Constantinescu, Natalia V Shirinskaya, Alexander N Zolotov, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Tsukasa Ikeura, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Louise Rasmussen, Bodil Andersson, Ahmed Bouzid, Ahmed Saidani, Nándor Ács, Zoltán Sipos, Nelli Farkas, Balázs Tihanyi, Brigitta Teutsch, Johan Nilsson, Alexandra Mikó, Péter Hegyi","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70121","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) during pregnancy is a challenging situation, and current guidelines for AP, pregnancy care, and surgery do not specifically address its management. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy in AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international retrospective multicenter cohort study encompassed questions related to demographic information, clinical presentation, management strategies, timing of cholecystectomy, approaches to the procedure, complications, and outcomes. Continuous variables were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons used Welch's t-test, Pearson's chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 cases from 14 countries and 19 centers were enrolled. Cholecystectomy after mild AP during pregnancy had a lower rate of readmission due to recurrent AP or other gallstone-related complications compared with those who did not undergo surgery after a mild AP during pregnancy (0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027). Cholecystectomy performed during pregnancy was associated with a low surgical complication rate, identical to that seen in postpartum procedures (12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999). Preterm birth occurred in 7.1% (n = 1/14) of patients with cholecystectomy versus 11% (n = 5/45) without. Fetal loss after surgery occurred only in the first trimester (n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49). No difference was seen in readmission (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138), fetal loss (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138) and preterm birth (6%, n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p > 0.999) between the surgical and ERCP groups. The fetal loss (9.1%, n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618) and preterm birth rates (5.9%, n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677) did not significantly differ between patients with and without ERCP during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cholecystectomy is effective and safe in pregnant patients during the second or third trimester in cases of mild biliary pancreatitis. ERCP is safe in any trimester.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1803-1811"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606018/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145228299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}