United European Gastroenterology Journal最新文献

JAK inhibitors are pivotal in treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease. However, emerging safety concerns warrant careful evaluation. A recent analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) revealed that RA patients using JAK inhibitors face nearly double the risk of gastrointestinal perforations (GIPs) compared to those on biologics, particularly with concurrent steroid or NSAID use. Additionally, the FDA's ORAL Surveillance study linked tofacitinib with higher rates of cancer and cardiovascular events, prompting regulatory restrictions. These findings highlight the importance of balancing JAK inhibitors' therapeutic benefits with potential risks, emphasizing the need for patient-centred risk assessment and vigilant monitoring to optimize outcomes.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) still has a relatively high complication rate, underscoring the importance of high-quality training. Despite existing guidelines, real-world data on training conditions remain limited. This pan-European survey aims to systematically explore the perceptions surrounding ERCP training.

Methods: A survey was distributed through the friends of United European Gastroenterology (UEG) Young Talent Group network to physicians working in a UEG member or associated states who regularly performed ERCPs.

Results: Of 1035 respondents from 35 countries, 649 were eligible for analysis: 228 trainees, 225 trainers, and 196 individuals who regularly performed ERCP but were neither trainees nor trainers. The mean age was 43 years, with 72.1% identifying as male, 27.6% as female, and 0.3% as non-binary. The majority (80.1%) agreed that a structured training regimen is desirable. However, only 13.7% of trainees and 28.4% of trainers reported having such a structured program in their institutions. Most respondents (79.7%) supported the concept of concentrating training in centers meeting specific quality metrics, with 64.1% suggesting a threshold of 200 annual ERCPs as a prerequisite. This threshold revealed that 36.4% of trainees pursued training in lower-volume centers performing <200 ERCPs annually. As many as 70.1% of trainees performed <50 annual ERCPs, whereas only 5.0% of trainers performed <50 ERCPs annually. A low individual trainee caseload (<50 ERCPs annually) was more common in lower-volume centers than in higher-volume centers (82.9% vs. 63.4%).

Conclusions: The first pan-European survey investigating ERCP training conditions reveals strong support for structured training and the concentration of training efforts within centers meeting specific quality metrics. Furthermore, this survey exposes the low availability of structured training programs with many trainees practicing at lower-volume centers and 71% of all trainees having little hands-on exposure. These data should motivate to standardize ERCP training conditions further and ultimately improve patient care throughout Europe.

The incidence and prevalence of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are steadily increasing. These tumors are highly heterogeneous, with treatment options ranging from observation to surgery, and various medical therapies. The choice of treatment is influenced by factors such as tumor stage, grade (proliferative activity), and the presence of hormone-related syndromes. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is becoming increasingly valuable for assessing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, offering detailed morphological, vascular, and functional information through techniques such as contrast enhancement and elastography. It also allows biopsies that are useful for both histopathological and molecular analyses. These tumors are highly heterogeneous, with treatment options ranging from observation to various medical therapies and surgery. Recent data suggest that small, non-functioning PanNENs with low proliferation rates may be safely monitored, whereas more aggressive or functioning tumors typically require surgery. EUS-guided ablation is a promising alternative for patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms who are unsuitable for surgery, although randomized trials are needed. In non-resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, treatment options include somatostatin analogs, targeted therapies (e.g., everolimus, sunitinib), chemotherapy, and radioligand therapy. This review discusses key factors in planning personalized treatment strategies for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranks among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite advances in precision oncology in other malignancies, treatment of PDAC still largely relies on conventional chemotherapy. Given the dismal prognosis and heterogeneity in PDAC, there is an urgent need for personalized therapeutic strategies to improve treatment response. Organoids, generated from patients' tumor tissue, have emerged as a powerful tool in cancer research. These three-dimensional models faithfully recapitulate the morphological and genetic features of the parental tumor and retain patient-specific heterogeneity. This review summarizes existing precision oncology approaches in PDAC, explores current applications and limitations of organoid cultures in personalized medicine, details preclinical studies correlating in vitro organoid prediction and patient treatment response, and provides an overview of ongoing organoid-based clinical trials.