Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-04-17DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70025
Vladyslav Dovhalyuk, Fan Yang, Sara Nikolic, Miroslav Vujasinovic, J-Matthias Löhr, Daniel Globisch
Background: Chronic pancreatitis is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis that is primarily characterized by its immune mediate etiology, clinically resembling pancreatic cancer, yet uniquely responsive to steroid treatment.
Objective: Early and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis is vital for effective treatment and patient prognosis, for which new diagnostic tools are urgently required. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been identified to correlate with the development of pancreatic diseases, which provides new opportunities for the discovery of disease biomarkers.
Methods: We utilized a mass spectrometric global metabolomics investigation of patient autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis fecal samples, investigating microbiome, dietary and human metabolism.
Results: We discovered a series of newly identified metabolic signatures between both patient groups including enterolactone, 4-guanidinobutanoic acid, and methylthioadenosine sulfoxide. Additionally, the analysis revealed significant differences in several metabolic pathways such as fatty acids, alkaloids, amino acids and peptides.
Conclusion: Our observations provide novel insights into important metabolic human pathways and microbiome-derived metabolites to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis. These findings reveal systemic metabolic responses and the identified metabolites may be developed into potential biomarkers for future diagnosis to distinguish between autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.
{"title":"Differences in the Fecal Metabolome of Autoimmune Pancreatitis Patients.","authors":"Vladyslav Dovhalyuk, Fan Yang, Sara Nikolic, Miroslav Vujasinovic, J-Matthias Löhr, Daniel Globisch","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pancreatitis is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis that is primarily characterized by its immune mediate etiology, clinically resembling pancreatic cancer, yet uniquely responsive to steroid treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis is vital for effective treatment and patient prognosis, for which new diagnostic tools are urgently required. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been identified to correlate with the development of pancreatic diseases, which provides new opportunities for the discovery of disease biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized a mass spectrometric global metabolomics investigation of patient autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis fecal samples, investigating microbiome, dietary and human metabolism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We discovered a series of newly identified metabolic signatures between both patient groups including enterolactone, 4-guanidinobutanoic acid, and methylthioadenosine sulfoxide. Additionally, the analysis revealed significant differences in several metabolic pathways such as fatty acids, alkaloids, amino acids and peptides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our observations provide novel insights into important metabolic human pathways and microbiome-derived metabolites to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis. These findings reveal systemic metabolic responses and the identified metabolites may be developed into potential biomarkers for future diagnosis to distinguish between autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1560-1570"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529019/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144034035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-07-24DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70082
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
{"title":"Professor Lars Aabakken: A Visionary in GI Endoscopy and Medical Education.","authors":"Mário Dinis-Ribeiro","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70082","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70082","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1597-1599"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S4"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496560/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S7-S188"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496558/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S1539-S1558"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-05-06DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70044
Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Akitoshi Hakoda, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Jun Matsuno, Yuki Uba, Mitsuki Tomita, Nobuhiro Hattori, Junichi Nakamura, Kimi Bessho, Taro Iwatsubo, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Ahmad F Aboelezz, Hiroki Nishikawa
Objectives: A novel partially self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) with an anti-migration system has recently become available during Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) but requires tract dilation. No previous study has compared the performance of dilation devices during EUS-HGS. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the technical success rate of tract dilation between a balloon catheter and drill dilator technique during EUS-HGS prior to insertion of SEMS with an anti-migration system.
Methods: A single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the balloon dilation and drill dilator techniques for first-line tract dilation during EUS-HGS. The primary outcome was the initial technical success rate of tract dilation for each technique during EUS-HGS. The secondary outcome was adverse events associated with the procedures.
Results: Of 54 randomized patients who underwent EUS-HGS at our center, there were 27 in the balloon dilation group and 27 in the drill dilation group. The initial technical success rate was 92.6% (25/27) in the balloon dilation group and 100% (27/27) in the drill dilation group (p = 0.1495). The technical success rate of stent delivery system insertion was significantly higher in the balloon dilation group (88%, 22/25) than in the drill dilation group (45%, 13/27; p = 0.0013). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the balloon dilation group (mean, 9.7 min) than in the drill dilation group (mean, 14.0 min; p = 0.047). Adverse events were more frequent in the drill dilation group (7.4% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.038).
Conclusions: Balloon dilation appears more suitable than drill dilation for PCSEMS with 8.5 Fr stent delivery system deployment.
Clinical trial registration number: University Hospital Medical Information Network 000049550.
{"title":"Balloon Catheter Versus Drill Dilator for EUS-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Stent Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Akitoshi Hakoda, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Jun Matsuno, Yuki Uba, Mitsuki Tomita, Nobuhiro Hattori, Junichi Nakamura, Kimi Bessho, Taro Iwatsubo, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Ahmad F Aboelezz, Hiroki Nishikawa","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A novel partially self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) with an anti-migration system has recently become available during Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) but requires tract dilation. No previous study has compared the performance of dilation devices during EUS-HGS. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the technical success rate of tract dilation between a balloon catheter and drill dilator technique during EUS-HGS prior to insertion of SEMS with an anti-migration system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the balloon dilation and drill dilator techniques for first-line tract dilation during EUS-HGS. The primary outcome was the initial technical success rate of tract dilation for each technique during EUS-HGS. The secondary outcome was adverse events associated with the procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 54 randomized patients who underwent EUS-HGS at our center, there were 27 in the balloon dilation group and 27 in the drill dilation group. The initial technical success rate was 92.6% (25/27) in the balloon dilation group and 100% (27/27) in the drill dilation group (p = 0.1495). The technical success rate of stent delivery system insertion was significantly higher in the balloon dilation group (88%, 22/25) than in the drill dilation group (45%, 13/27; p = 0.0013). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the balloon dilation group (mean, 9.7 min) than in the drill dilation group (mean, 14.0 min; p = 0.047). Adverse events were more frequent in the drill dilation group (7.4% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilation appears more suitable than drill dilation for PCSEMS with 8.5 Fr stent delivery system deployment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>University Hospital Medical Information Network 000049550.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1429-1437"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144050297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) in adult patients with chronic constipation.
Design: Consecutive patients who met the Rome IV criteria for chronic constipation were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the taVNS group or the sham-taVNS group. Treatment consisted of 30 min of therapy twice a day for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the response rate at week 1-4, defined as the proportion of patients with a weekly complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) of ≥ 3 and weekly excessive use of rescue medication ≤ 3 times. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous bowel movements, anxiety and depression scores, abdominal symptoms, and adverse events.
Results: The study was terminated due to lack of efficacy revealed by the interim analysis. A total of 106 patients were randomized, with 52 participants in the taVNS group and 54 participants in the sham-taVNS group. After 4 weeks of treatment, the response rates were 17% (9/52) in the taVNS group and 19% (10/54) in the sham-taVNS group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.30-2.80, p = 1) or in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Our study did not support the effectiveness of 4-week 25 Hz taVNS for the treatment of adult chronic constipation patients.
目的:探讨经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)治疗成人慢性便秘的疗效。设计:连续招募符合慢性便秘罗马IV标准的患者,并随机分配到taVNS组或假taVNS组。治疗为每次30分钟,每天2次,连续4周。主要终点是第1-4周的缓解率,定义为每周完全自发排便(CSBM)≥3次和每周过度使用抢救药物≤3次的患者比例。次要结局包括自发排便、焦虑和抑郁评分、腹部症状和不良事件。结果:由于中期分析显示缺乏疗效,本研究终止。106例患者被随机分组,其中52例为taVNS组,54例为假taVNS组。治疗4周后,taVNS组有效率为17%(9/52),假taVNS组有效率为19%(10/54)。两组在意向治疗(ITT)分析(RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.30-2.80, p = 1)或按方案(PP)分析中无显著差异。无严重不良事件报告。结论:我们的研究不支持4周25 Hz taVNS治疗成人慢性便秘患者的有效性。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov号码:NCT05723731。
{"title":"Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Chronic Constipation: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Tangyi Liu, Zeyu Wang, Yunling Li, Xiaoyu Kang, Xiangping Wang, Gui Ren, Yong Lv, Jing Li, Yaling Liu, Shuhui Liang, Xin Wang, Xiaojun Huang, Xiaoyin Zhang, Jun Wang, Yongzhan Nie, Hui Luo, Jinbo Sun, Wei Qin, Ying Han, Yanglin Pan","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70041","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) in adult patients with chronic constipation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Consecutive patients who met the Rome IV criteria for chronic constipation were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the taVNS group or the sham-taVNS group. Treatment consisted of 30 min of therapy twice a day for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the response rate at week 1-4, defined as the proportion of patients with a weekly complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) of ≥ 3 and weekly excessive use of rescue medication ≤ 3 times. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous bowel movements, anxiety and depression scores, abdominal symptoms, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was terminated due to lack of efficacy revealed by the interim analysis. A total of 106 patients were randomized, with 52 participants in the taVNS group and 54 participants in the sham-taVNS group. After 4 weeks of treatment, the response rates were 17% (9/52) in the taVNS group and 19% (10/54) in the sham-taVNS group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.30-2.80, p = 1) or in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study did not support the effectiveness of 4-week 25 Hz taVNS for the treatment of adult chronic constipation patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT05723731.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1550-1559"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529053/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144050136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70088
{"title":"Correction to \"Esophageal and Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Clinical Recommendations From the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70088","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70088","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1607"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144761384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S189-S802"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70061
Daniel de la Iglesia, Belén Agudo-Castillo, Marco Galego-Fernández, Alberto Rama-Fernández, J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz
Introduction: Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) results from a reduction in pancreatic secretion of enzymes, leading to malabsorption of nutrients, intestinal symptoms, nutritional deficiencies and related comorbidities. The diagnosis of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency should be based on digestive tests, mainly the coefficient of fat absorption (CFA), based on the quantification of 72 h fecal fat excretion (FFE). However, this test is rarely performed in clinical practice. Fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) is a simple and widely used alternative. This meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of fecal elastase-1 for the diagnosis of PEI diagnosed by CFA or 72h-FFE.
Methods: A systematic search of databases was performed to identify studies evaluating fecal elastase-1 and CFA/FFE for the diagnosis of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Inclusion criteria required original studies with data on sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic metrics. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared tests.
Results: Thirteen studies with 888 patients were included. Fecal elastase-1 at a cut-off of 200 μg/g showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 and 0.69, respectively, with a DOR of 35.27. Lowering the cut-off to 100 μg/g improved specificity to 0.82 but decreased sensitivity to 0.88. Subgroup analyses showed different diagnostic performance in different clinical contexts, with higher sensitivity in cystic fibrosis (0.98) and higher specificity in chronic pancreatitis (0.81). The positive and negative predictive values are limited in situations with low and high probability of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, respectively.
Conclusions: Fecal elastase-1 is a sensitive and moderately specific diagnostic tool for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and is suitable for initial screening in high-risk populations. However, its moderate specificity requires careful interpretation in lower risk settings.
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Elastase-1 Test for Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Daniel de la Iglesia, Belén Agudo-Castillo, Marco Galego-Fernández, Alberto Rama-Fernández, J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70061","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) results from a reduction in pancreatic secretion of enzymes, leading to malabsorption of nutrients, intestinal symptoms, nutritional deficiencies and related comorbidities. The diagnosis of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency should be based on digestive tests, mainly the coefficient of fat absorption (CFA), based on the quantification of 72 h fecal fat excretion (FFE). However, this test is rarely performed in clinical practice. Fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) is a simple and widely used alternative. This meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of fecal elastase-1 for the diagnosis of PEI diagnosed by CFA or 72h-FFE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of databases was performed to identify studies evaluating fecal elastase-1 and CFA/FFE for the diagnosis of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Inclusion criteria required original studies with data on sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic metrics. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies with 888 patients were included. Fecal elastase-1 at a cut-off of 200 μg/g showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 and 0.69, respectively, with a DOR of 35.27. Lowering the cut-off to 100 μg/g improved specificity to 0.82 but decreased sensitivity to 0.88. Subgroup analyses showed different diagnostic performance in different clinical contexts, with higher sensitivity in cystic fibrosis (0.98) and higher specificity in chronic pancreatitis (0.81). The positive and negative predictive values are limited in situations with low and high probability of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fecal elastase-1 is a sensitive and moderately specific diagnostic tool for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and is suitable for initial screening in high-risk populations. However, its moderate specificity requires careful interpretation in lower risk settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1571-1582"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529004/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144508443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}