Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-04DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70121
Dorottya Tarján, Eszter Ágnes Szalai, Bálint Erőss, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Vasile Liviu Drug, Serge Chooklin, Michael Hirth, Gabriel Sandblom, Vanessa Sandblom, Åsa Edergren, Ahmed Tlili, Sami Fendri, Simon Sirtl, Daniel de la Iglesia Gracía, Floreta Kurti, Dong Wu, Adriana Gherbon, Łukasz Nawacki, Alexandru Constantinescu, Natalia V Shirinskaya, Alexander N Zolotov, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Tsukasa Ikeura, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Louise Rasmussen, Bodil Andersson, Ahmed Bouzid, Ahmed Saidani, Nándor Ács, Zoltán Sipos, Nelli Farkas, Balázs Tihanyi, Brigitta Teutsch, Johan Nilsson, Alexandra Mikó, Péter Hegyi
Background: Biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) during pregnancy is a challenging situation, and current guidelines for AP, pregnancy care, and surgery do not specifically address its management. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy in AP.
Methods: This international retrospective multicenter cohort study encompassed questions related to demographic information, clinical presentation, management strategies, timing of cholecystectomy, approaches to the procedure, complications, and outcomes. Continuous variables were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons used Welch's t-test, Pearson's chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests.
Results: A total of 101 cases from 14 countries and 19 centers were enrolled. Cholecystectomy after mild AP during pregnancy had a lower rate of readmission due to recurrent AP or other gallstone-related complications compared with those who did not undergo surgery after a mild AP during pregnancy (0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027). Cholecystectomy performed during pregnancy was associated with a low surgical complication rate, identical to that seen in postpartum procedures (12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999). Preterm birth occurred in 7.1% (n = 1/14) of patients with cholecystectomy versus 11% (n = 5/45) without. Fetal loss after surgery occurred only in the first trimester (n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49). No difference was seen in readmission (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138), fetal loss (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138) and preterm birth (6%, n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p > 0.999) between the surgical and ERCP groups. The fetal loss (9.1%, n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618) and preterm birth rates (5.9%, n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677) did not significantly differ between patients with and without ERCP during pregnancy.
Conclusion: Cholecystectomy is effective and safe in pregnant patients during the second or third trimester in cases of mild biliary pancreatitis. ERCP is safe in any trimester.
背景:妊娠期胆道性急性胰腺炎(AP)是一个具有挑战性的情况,目前的AP、妊娠护理和手术指南没有专门针对其管理。本研究调查了ap妊娠期胆囊切除术和内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的安全性和有效性。方法:这项国际回顾性多中心队列研究包括与人口统计学信息、临床表现、管理策略、胆囊切除术时机、手术方法、并发症和结局相关的问题。连续变量概括为四分位数范围的中位数,分类变量概括为频率和百分比。组间比较采用韦尔奇t检验、皮尔逊卡方检验或费雪精确检验。结果:共有来自14个国家19个中心的101例病例入组。与妊娠期轻度AP后未行手术的患者相比,妊娠期轻度AP后行胆囊切除术的患者因复发性AP或其他胆结石相关并发症再入院率较低(0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027)。妊娠期胆囊切除术的手术并发症发生率较低,与产后手术相同(12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999)。早产儿发生率为7.1% (n = 1/14),而未行胆囊切除术的早产儿发生率为11% (n = 5/45)。手术后胎儿丢失仅发生在妊娠早期(n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49)。手术组和ERCP组在再入院(5%,n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138)、胎儿丢失(5%,n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138)和早产(6%,n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p = 0.0.999)方面均无差异。妊娠期有无ERCP患者的胎儿丢失(9.1%,n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618)和早产率(5.9%,n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677)无显著差异。结论:对妊娠中晚期轻度胆源性胰腺炎患者行胆囊切除术是安全有效的。ERCP在任何妊娠期都是安全的。
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Cholecystectomy and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Biliary Pancreatitis During Pregnancy: BORN Study.","authors":"Dorottya Tarján, Eszter Ágnes Szalai, Bálint Erőss, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Vasile Liviu Drug, Serge Chooklin, Michael Hirth, Gabriel Sandblom, Vanessa Sandblom, Åsa Edergren, Ahmed Tlili, Sami Fendri, Simon Sirtl, Daniel de la Iglesia Gracía, Floreta Kurti, Dong Wu, Adriana Gherbon, Łukasz Nawacki, Alexandru Constantinescu, Natalia V Shirinskaya, Alexander N Zolotov, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Tsukasa Ikeura, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Louise Rasmussen, Bodil Andersson, Ahmed Bouzid, Ahmed Saidani, Nándor Ács, Zoltán Sipos, Nelli Farkas, Balázs Tihanyi, Brigitta Teutsch, Johan Nilsson, Alexandra Mikó, Péter Hegyi","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70121","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) during pregnancy is a challenging situation, and current guidelines for AP, pregnancy care, and surgery do not specifically address its management. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy in AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international retrospective multicenter cohort study encompassed questions related to demographic information, clinical presentation, management strategies, timing of cholecystectomy, approaches to the procedure, complications, and outcomes. Continuous variables were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons used Welch's t-test, Pearson's chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 cases from 14 countries and 19 centers were enrolled. Cholecystectomy after mild AP during pregnancy had a lower rate of readmission due to recurrent AP or other gallstone-related complications compared with those who did not undergo surgery after a mild AP during pregnancy (0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027). Cholecystectomy performed during pregnancy was associated with a low surgical complication rate, identical to that seen in postpartum procedures (12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999). Preterm birth occurred in 7.1% (n = 1/14) of patients with cholecystectomy versus 11% (n = 5/45) without. Fetal loss after surgery occurred only in the first trimester (n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49). No difference was seen in readmission (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138), fetal loss (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138) and preterm birth (6%, n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p > 0.999) between the surgical and ERCP groups. The fetal loss (9.1%, n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618) and preterm birth rates (5.9%, n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677) did not significantly differ between patients with and without ERCP during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cholecystectomy is effective and safe in pregnant patients during the second or third trimester in cases of mild biliary pancreatitis. ERCP is safe in any trimester.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1803-1811"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606018/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145228299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S4"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496560/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S7-S188"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496558/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S1539-S1558"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-06-24DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70071
Shin Ju Oh, Min-Taek Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Chi Hyuk Oh, Sun-Young Jung, Chang Kyun Lee
Background: Early advanced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy is emphasised to prevent disease progression and restore quality of life.
Aims: To evaluate the potential advantages of early versus late anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with IBD.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed IBD (2004-2018) who received anti-TNF therapy and had at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients were categorised as early or late users based on a 2-year post-diagnosis cut-off for first anti-TNF exposure. Outcomes included IBD-related surgeries, hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and drug persistence. Subgroup analysis examined concurrent immunomodulator use, and sensitivity analyses were employed 6 months or 1 year post-diagnosis cut-offs.
Results: Among 8105 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8465 with Crohn's disease (CD), distinct outcomes emerged. Early anti-TNF users with UC had significantly higher hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.96) and ED visit rates (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.46) compared with late users. In CD, early users showed a non-significant trend toward fewer event rates. Drug persistence was longer among late users for both UC and CD. In UC, combining immunomodulators with early anti-TNF increased hospitalization and ED visits but not in CD. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary findings.
Conclusions: While early anti-TNF use was associated with differential outcomes in CD, the relationship between treatment timing and clinical course diverged in UC, challenging the assumption that early intervention is universally advantageous across IBD subtypes. These findings underscore the need for further research to identify patient subgroups that might benefit most from early intervention.
背景:早期晚期炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗强调预防疾病进展和恢复生活质量。目的:评估IBD患者早期与晚期抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗的潜在优势。方法:本回顾性研究纳入新诊断的IBD患者(2004-2018),接受抗tnf治疗,随访至少1年。根据首次抗tnf暴露的诊断后2年截止时间,将患者分为早期或晚期使用者。结果包括ibd相关手术、住院、急诊科(ED)就诊和药物持久性。亚组分析检查同时使用免疫调节剂,敏感性分析采用诊断后6个月或1年的截止值。结果:在8105例溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者和8465例克罗恩病(CD)患者中,出现了不同的结局。早期抗肿瘤坏死因子使用者合并UC的住院率(风险比[HR] 1.34, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.91-1.96)和ED就诊率(HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.46)明显高于晚期使用者。在CD中,早期用户呈现出较少事件率的不显著趋势。在UC和CD的晚期使用者中,药物持续时间更长。在UC中,将免疫调节剂与早期抗tnf联合使用增加了住院和ED就诊次数,但在CD中没有。敏感性分析证实了最初的发现。结论:虽然早期使用抗tnf与CD的不同结果相关,但UC的治疗时间和临床病程之间的关系存在分歧,这挑战了早期干预在IBD亚型中普遍有利的假设。这些发现强调了进一步研究的必要性,以确定可能从早期干预中获益最多的患者亚组。
{"title":"Differential Outcomes of Early Versus Late Anti-TNF Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Shin Ju Oh, Min-Taek Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Chi Hyuk Oh, Sun-Young Jung, Chang Kyun Lee","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70071","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early advanced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy is emphasised to prevent disease progression and restore quality of life.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the potential advantages of early versus late anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed IBD (2004-2018) who received anti-TNF therapy and had at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients were categorised as early or late users based on a 2-year post-diagnosis cut-off for first anti-TNF exposure. Outcomes included IBD-related surgeries, hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and drug persistence. Subgroup analysis examined concurrent immunomodulator use, and sensitivity analyses were employed 6 months or 1 year post-diagnosis cut-offs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8105 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8465 with Crohn's disease (CD), distinct outcomes emerged. Early anti-TNF users with UC had significantly higher hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.96) and ED visit rates (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.46) compared with late users. In CD, early users showed a non-significant trend toward fewer event rates. Drug persistence was longer among late users for both UC and CD. In UC, combining immunomodulators with early anti-TNF increased hospitalization and ED visits but not in CD. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While early anti-TNF use was associated with differential outcomes in CD, the relationship between treatment timing and clinical course diverged in UC, challenging the assumption that early intervention is universally advantageous across IBD subtypes. These findings underscore the need for further research to identify patient subgroups that might benefit most from early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1502-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529011/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144486069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-04-17DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70025
Vladyslav Dovhalyuk, Fan Yang, Sara Nikolic, Miroslav Vujasinovic, J-Matthias Löhr, Daniel Globisch
Background: Chronic pancreatitis is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis that is primarily characterized by its immune mediate etiology, clinically resembling pancreatic cancer, yet uniquely responsive to steroid treatment.
Objective: Early and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis is vital for effective treatment and patient prognosis, for which new diagnostic tools are urgently required. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been identified to correlate with the development of pancreatic diseases, which provides new opportunities for the discovery of disease biomarkers.
Methods: We utilized a mass spectrometric global metabolomics investigation of patient autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis fecal samples, investigating microbiome, dietary and human metabolism.
Results: We discovered a series of newly identified metabolic signatures between both patient groups including enterolactone, 4-guanidinobutanoic acid, and methylthioadenosine sulfoxide. Additionally, the analysis revealed significant differences in several metabolic pathways such as fatty acids, alkaloids, amino acids and peptides.
Conclusion: Our observations provide novel insights into important metabolic human pathways and microbiome-derived metabolites to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis. These findings reveal systemic metabolic responses and the identified metabolites may be developed into potential biomarkers for future diagnosis to distinguish between autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.
{"title":"Differences in the Fecal Metabolome of Autoimmune Pancreatitis Patients.","authors":"Vladyslav Dovhalyuk, Fan Yang, Sara Nikolic, Miroslav Vujasinovic, J-Matthias Löhr, Daniel Globisch","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pancreatitis is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis that is primarily characterized by its immune mediate etiology, clinically resembling pancreatic cancer, yet uniquely responsive to steroid treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis is vital for effective treatment and patient prognosis, for which new diagnostic tools are urgently required. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been identified to correlate with the development of pancreatic diseases, which provides new opportunities for the discovery of disease biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized a mass spectrometric global metabolomics investigation of patient autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis fecal samples, investigating microbiome, dietary and human metabolism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We discovered a series of newly identified metabolic signatures between both patient groups including enterolactone, 4-guanidinobutanoic acid, and methylthioadenosine sulfoxide. Additionally, the analysis revealed significant differences in several metabolic pathways such as fatty acids, alkaloids, amino acids and peptides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our observations provide novel insights into important metabolic human pathways and microbiome-derived metabolites to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis. These findings reveal systemic metabolic responses and the identified metabolites may be developed into potential biomarkers for future diagnosis to distinguish between autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1560-1570"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529019/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144034035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-07-24DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70082
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
{"title":"Professor Lars Aabakken: A Visionary in GI Endoscopy and Medical Education.","authors":"Mário Dinis-Ribeiro","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70082","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70082","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1597-1599"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70088
{"title":"Correction to \"Esophageal and Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Clinical Recommendations From the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70088","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70088","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1607"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144761384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S189-S802"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-05-06DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70044
Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Akitoshi Hakoda, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Jun Matsuno, Yuki Uba, Mitsuki Tomita, Nobuhiro Hattori, Junichi Nakamura, Kimi Bessho, Taro Iwatsubo, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Ahmad F Aboelezz, Hiroki Nishikawa
Objectives: A novel partially self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) with an anti-migration system has recently become available during Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) but requires tract dilation. No previous study has compared the performance of dilation devices during EUS-HGS. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the technical success rate of tract dilation between a balloon catheter and drill dilator technique during EUS-HGS prior to insertion of SEMS with an anti-migration system.
Methods: A single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the balloon dilation and drill dilator techniques for first-line tract dilation during EUS-HGS. The primary outcome was the initial technical success rate of tract dilation for each technique during EUS-HGS. The secondary outcome was adverse events associated with the procedures.
Results: Of 54 randomized patients who underwent EUS-HGS at our center, there were 27 in the balloon dilation group and 27 in the drill dilation group. The initial technical success rate was 92.6% (25/27) in the balloon dilation group and 100% (27/27) in the drill dilation group (p = 0.1495). The technical success rate of stent delivery system insertion was significantly higher in the balloon dilation group (88%, 22/25) than in the drill dilation group (45%, 13/27; p = 0.0013). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the balloon dilation group (mean, 9.7 min) than in the drill dilation group (mean, 14.0 min; p = 0.047). Adverse events were more frequent in the drill dilation group (7.4% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.038).
Conclusions: Balloon dilation appears more suitable than drill dilation for PCSEMS with 8.5 Fr stent delivery system deployment.
Clinical trial registration number: University Hospital Medical Information Network 000049550.
{"title":"Balloon Catheter Versus Drill Dilator for EUS-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Stent Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Akitoshi Hakoda, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Jun Matsuno, Yuki Uba, Mitsuki Tomita, Nobuhiro Hattori, Junichi Nakamura, Kimi Bessho, Taro Iwatsubo, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Ahmad F Aboelezz, Hiroki Nishikawa","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A novel partially self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) with an anti-migration system has recently become available during Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) but requires tract dilation. No previous study has compared the performance of dilation devices during EUS-HGS. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the technical success rate of tract dilation between a balloon catheter and drill dilator technique during EUS-HGS prior to insertion of SEMS with an anti-migration system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the balloon dilation and drill dilator techniques for first-line tract dilation during EUS-HGS. The primary outcome was the initial technical success rate of tract dilation for each technique during EUS-HGS. The secondary outcome was adverse events associated with the procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 54 randomized patients who underwent EUS-HGS at our center, there were 27 in the balloon dilation group and 27 in the drill dilation group. The initial technical success rate was 92.6% (25/27) in the balloon dilation group and 100% (27/27) in the drill dilation group (p = 0.1495). The technical success rate of stent delivery system insertion was significantly higher in the balloon dilation group (88%, 22/25) than in the drill dilation group (45%, 13/27; p = 0.0013). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the balloon dilation group (mean, 9.7 min) than in the drill dilation group (mean, 14.0 min; p = 0.047). Adverse events were more frequent in the drill dilation group (7.4% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilation appears more suitable than drill dilation for PCSEMS with 8.5 Fr stent delivery system deployment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>University Hospital Medical Information Network 000049550.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1429-1437"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144050297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}