首页 > 最新文献

United European Gastroenterology Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Safety and Effectiveness of Cholecystectomy and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Biliary Pancreatitis During Pregnancy: BORN Study. 妊娠期胆道性胰腺炎胆囊切除术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影的安全性和有效性:BORN研究。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-04 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70121
Dorottya Tarján, Eszter Ágnes Szalai, Bálint Erőss, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Vasile Liviu Drug, Serge Chooklin, Michael Hirth, Gabriel Sandblom, Vanessa Sandblom, Åsa Edergren, Ahmed Tlili, Sami Fendri, Simon Sirtl, Daniel de la Iglesia Gracía, Floreta Kurti, Dong Wu, Adriana Gherbon, Łukasz Nawacki, Alexandru Constantinescu, Natalia V Shirinskaya, Alexander N Zolotov, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Tsukasa Ikeura, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Louise Rasmussen, Bodil Andersson, Ahmed Bouzid, Ahmed Saidani, Nándor Ács, Zoltán Sipos, Nelli Farkas, Balázs Tihanyi, Brigitta Teutsch, Johan Nilsson, Alexandra Mikó, Péter Hegyi

Background: Biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) during pregnancy is a challenging situation, and current guidelines for AP, pregnancy care, and surgery do not specifically address its management. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy in AP.

Methods: This international retrospective multicenter cohort study encompassed questions related to demographic information, clinical presentation, management strategies, timing of cholecystectomy, approaches to the procedure, complications, and outcomes. Continuous variables were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons used Welch's t-test, Pearson's chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests.

Results: A total of 101 cases from 14 countries and 19 centers were enrolled. Cholecystectomy after mild AP during pregnancy had a lower rate of readmission due to recurrent AP or other gallstone-related complications compared with those who did not undergo surgery after a mild AP during pregnancy (0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027). Cholecystectomy performed during pregnancy was associated with a low surgical complication rate, identical to that seen in postpartum procedures (12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999). Preterm birth occurred in 7.1% (n = 1/14) of patients with cholecystectomy versus 11% (n = 5/45) without. Fetal loss after surgery occurred only in the first trimester (n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49). No difference was seen in readmission (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138), fetal loss (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138) and preterm birth (6%, n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p > 0.999) between the surgical and ERCP groups. The fetal loss (9.1%, n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618) and preterm birth rates (5.9%, n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677) did not significantly differ between patients with and without ERCP during pregnancy.

Conclusion: Cholecystectomy is effective and safe in pregnant patients during the second or third trimester in cases of mild biliary pancreatitis. ERCP is safe in any trimester.

背景:妊娠期胆道性急性胰腺炎(AP)是一个具有挑战性的情况,目前的AP、妊娠护理和手术指南没有专门针对其管理。本研究调查了ap妊娠期胆囊切除术和内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的安全性和有效性。方法:这项国际回顾性多中心队列研究包括与人口统计学信息、临床表现、管理策略、胆囊切除术时机、手术方法、并发症和结局相关的问题。连续变量概括为四分位数范围的中位数,分类变量概括为频率和百分比。组间比较采用韦尔奇t检验、皮尔逊卡方检验或费雪精确检验。结果:共有来自14个国家19个中心的101例病例入组。与妊娠期轻度AP后未行手术的患者相比,妊娠期轻度AP后行胆囊切除术的患者因复发性AP或其他胆结石相关并发症再入院率较低(0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027)。妊娠期胆囊切除术的手术并发症发生率较低,与产后手术相同(12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999)。早产儿发生率为7.1% (n = 1/14),而未行胆囊切除术的早产儿发生率为11% (n = 5/45)。手术后胎儿丢失仅发生在妊娠早期(n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49)。手术组和ERCP组在再入院(5%,n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138)、胎儿丢失(5%,n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138)和早产(6%,n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p = 0.0.999)方面均无差异。妊娠期有无ERCP患者的胎儿丢失(9.1%,n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618)和早产率(5.9%,n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677)无显著差异。结论:对妊娠中晚期轻度胆源性胰腺炎患者行胆囊切除术是安全有效的。ERCP在任何妊娠期都是安全的。
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Cholecystectomy and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Biliary Pancreatitis During Pregnancy: BORN Study.","authors":"Dorottya Tarján, Eszter Ágnes Szalai, Bálint Erőss, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Vasile Liviu Drug, Serge Chooklin, Michael Hirth, Gabriel Sandblom, Vanessa Sandblom, Åsa Edergren, Ahmed Tlili, Sami Fendri, Simon Sirtl, Daniel de la Iglesia Gracía, Floreta Kurti, Dong Wu, Adriana Gherbon, Łukasz Nawacki, Alexandru Constantinescu, Natalia V Shirinskaya, Alexander N Zolotov, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Tsukasa Ikeura, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Louise Rasmussen, Bodil Andersson, Ahmed Bouzid, Ahmed Saidani, Nándor Ács, Zoltán Sipos, Nelli Farkas, Balázs Tihanyi, Brigitta Teutsch, Johan Nilsson, Alexandra Mikó, Péter Hegyi","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70121","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) during pregnancy is a challenging situation, and current guidelines for AP, pregnancy care, and surgery do not specifically address its management. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy in AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international retrospective multicenter cohort study encompassed questions related to demographic information, clinical presentation, management strategies, timing of cholecystectomy, approaches to the procedure, complications, and outcomes. Continuous variables were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons used Welch's t-test, Pearson's chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 cases from 14 countries and 19 centers were enrolled. Cholecystectomy after mild AP during pregnancy had a lower rate of readmission due to recurrent AP or other gallstone-related complications compared with those who did not undergo surgery after a mild AP during pregnancy (0% vs. 24%; n = 0/17 vs. n = 12/49, p = 0.027). Cholecystectomy performed during pregnancy was associated with a low surgical complication rate, identical to that seen in postpartum procedures (12% vs. 10%; n = 2/17 vs. n = 3/30; p > 0.999). Preterm birth occurred in 7.1% (n = 1/14) of patients with cholecystectomy versus 11% (n = 5/45) without. Fetal loss after surgery occurred only in the first trimester (n = 3/17 vs. n = 1/49). No difference was seen in readmission (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138), fetal loss (5%, n = 1/21 vs. 27%, n = 4/15; p = 0.138) and preterm birth (6%, n = 1/17 vs. 8%, n = 1/12; p > 0.999) between the surgical and ERCP groups. The fetal loss (9.1%, n = 2/22 vs. 5.4%, n = 4/74; p = 0.618) and preterm birth rates (5.9%, n = 1/17 vs. 12%, n = 8/65; p = 0.677) did not significantly differ between patients with and without ERCP during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cholecystectomy is effective and safe in pregnant patients during the second or third trimester in cases of mild biliary pancreatitis. ERCP is safe in any trimester.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1803-1811"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606018/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145228299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025. 补充:第33届联合欧洲胃肠病学周2025。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70030
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S4"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496560/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025. 补充:第33届联合欧洲胃肠病学周2025。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70032
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S7-S188"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496558/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025. 补充:第33届联合欧洲胃肠病学周2025。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70038
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S1539-S1558"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differential Outcomes of Early Versus Late Anti-TNF Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. 溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病早期与晚期抗tnf治疗的差异结果:一项全国倾向评分匹配的队列研究
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70071
Shin Ju Oh, Min-Taek Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Chi Hyuk Oh, Sun-Young Jung, Chang Kyun Lee

Background: Early advanced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy is emphasised to prevent disease progression and restore quality of life.

Aims: To evaluate the potential advantages of early versus late anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with IBD.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed IBD (2004-2018) who received anti-TNF therapy and had at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients were categorised as early or late users based on a 2-year post-diagnosis cut-off for first anti-TNF exposure. Outcomes included IBD-related surgeries, hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and drug persistence. Subgroup analysis examined concurrent immunomodulator use, and sensitivity analyses were employed 6 months or 1 year post-diagnosis cut-offs.

Results: Among 8105 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8465 with Crohn's disease (CD), distinct outcomes emerged. Early anti-TNF users with UC had significantly higher hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.96) and ED visit rates (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.46) compared with late users. In CD, early users showed a non-significant trend toward fewer event rates. Drug persistence was longer among late users for both UC and CD. In UC, combining immunomodulators with early anti-TNF increased hospitalization and ED visits but not in CD. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary findings.

Conclusions: While early anti-TNF use was associated with differential outcomes in CD, the relationship between treatment timing and clinical course diverged in UC, challenging the assumption that early intervention is universally advantageous across IBD subtypes. These findings underscore the need for further research to identify patient subgroups that might benefit most from early intervention.

背景:早期晚期炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗强调预防疾病进展和恢复生活质量。目的:评估IBD患者早期与晚期抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)治疗的潜在优势。方法:本回顾性研究纳入新诊断的IBD患者(2004-2018),接受抗tnf治疗,随访至少1年。根据首次抗tnf暴露的诊断后2年截止时间,将患者分为早期或晚期使用者。结果包括ibd相关手术、住院、急诊科(ED)就诊和药物持久性。亚组分析检查同时使用免疫调节剂,敏感性分析采用诊断后6个月或1年的截止值。结果:在8105例溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者和8465例克罗恩病(CD)患者中,出现了不同的结局。早期抗肿瘤坏死因子使用者合并UC的住院率(风险比[HR] 1.34, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.91-1.96)和ED就诊率(HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.46)明显高于晚期使用者。在CD中,早期用户呈现出较少事件率的不显著趋势。在UC和CD的晚期使用者中,药物持续时间更长。在UC中,将免疫调节剂与早期抗tnf联合使用增加了住院和ED就诊次数,但在CD中没有。敏感性分析证实了最初的发现。结论:虽然早期使用抗tnf与CD的不同结果相关,但UC的治疗时间和临床病程之间的关系存在分歧,这挑战了早期干预在IBD亚型中普遍有利的假设。这些发现强调了进一步研究的必要性,以确定可能从早期干预中获益最多的患者亚组。
{"title":"Differential Outcomes of Early Versus Late Anti-TNF Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Shin Ju Oh, Min-Taek Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Chi Hyuk Oh, Sun-Young Jung, Chang Kyun Lee","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70071","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early advanced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy is emphasised to prevent disease progression and restore quality of life.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the potential advantages of early versus late anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed IBD (2004-2018) who received anti-TNF therapy and had at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients were categorised as early or late users based on a 2-year post-diagnosis cut-off for first anti-TNF exposure. Outcomes included IBD-related surgeries, hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and drug persistence. Subgroup analysis examined concurrent immunomodulator use, and sensitivity analyses were employed 6 months or 1 year post-diagnosis cut-offs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8105 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8465 with Crohn's disease (CD), distinct outcomes emerged. Early anti-TNF users with UC had significantly higher hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.96) and ED visit rates (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.46) compared with late users. In CD, early users showed a non-significant trend toward fewer event rates. Drug persistence was longer among late users for both UC and CD. In UC, combining immunomodulators with early anti-TNF increased hospitalization and ED visits but not in CD. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While early anti-TNF use was associated with differential outcomes in CD, the relationship between treatment timing and clinical course diverged in UC, challenging the assumption that early intervention is universally advantageous across IBD subtypes. These findings underscore the need for further research to identify patient subgroups that might benefit most from early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1502-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529011/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144486069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in the Fecal Metabolome of Autoimmune Pancreatitis Patients. 自身免疫性胰腺炎患者粪便代谢组的差异
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70025
Vladyslav Dovhalyuk, Fan Yang, Sara Nikolic, Miroslav Vujasinovic, J-Matthias Löhr, Daniel Globisch

Background: Chronic pancreatitis is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis that is primarily characterized by its immune mediate etiology, clinically resembling pancreatic cancer, yet uniquely responsive to steroid treatment.

Objective: Early and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis is vital for effective treatment and patient prognosis, for which new diagnostic tools are urgently required. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been identified to correlate with the development of pancreatic diseases, which provides new opportunities for the discovery of disease biomarkers.

Methods: We utilized a mass spectrometric global metabolomics investigation of patient autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis fecal samples, investigating microbiome, dietary and human metabolism.

Results: We discovered a series of newly identified metabolic signatures between both patient groups including enterolactone, 4-guanidinobutanoic acid, and methylthioadenosine sulfoxide. Additionally, the analysis revealed significant differences in several metabolic pathways such as fatty acids, alkaloids, amino acids and peptides.

Conclusion: Our observations provide novel insights into important metabolic human pathways and microbiome-derived metabolites to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis. These findings reveal systemic metabolic responses and the identified metabolites may be developed into potential biomarkers for future diagnosis to distinguish between autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.

背景:慢性胰腺炎是胰腺癌的危险因素。自身免疫性胰腺炎是慢性胰腺炎的一种独特形式,其主要特征是其免疫介导的病因,临床类似于胰腺癌,但对类固醇治疗有独特的反应。目的:早期准确诊断自身免疫性胰腺炎对有效治疗和患者预后至关重要,迫切需要新的诊断工具。肠道菌群失调已被确定与胰腺疾病的发展相关,这为发现疾病生物标志物提供了新的机会。方法:利用质谱法对自身免疫性胰腺炎和慢性胰腺炎患者粪便样本进行全球代谢组学研究,研究微生物组、饮食和人体代谢。结果:我们在两组患者之间发现了一系列新鉴定的代谢特征,包括肠内酯、4-胍丁酸和甲基硫代腺苷亚砜。此外,分析还揭示了脂肪酸、生物碱、氨基酸和肽等几种代谢途径的显著差异。结论:我们的观察结果为区分自身免疫性胰腺炎和慢性胰腺炎提供了重要的人体代谢途径和微生物衍生代谢物的新见解。这些发现揭示了全身代谢反应,鉴定的代谢物可能发展成为未来诊断自身免疫性胰腺炎和慢性胰腺炎的潜在生物标志物。
{"title":"Differences in the Fecal Metabolome of Autoimmune Pancreatitis Patients.","authors":"Vladyslav Dovhalyuk, Fan Yang, Sara Nikolic, Miroslav Vujasinovic, J-Matthias Löhr, Daniel Globisch","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70025","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pancreatitis is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis that is primarily characterized by its immune mediate etiology, clinically resembling pancreatic cancer, yet uniquely responsive to steroid treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis is vital for effective treatment and patient prognosis, for which new diagnostic tools are urgently required. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been identified to correlate with the development of pancreatic diseases, which provides new opportunities for the discovery of disease biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized a mass spectrometric global metabolomics investigation of patient autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis fecal samples, investigating microbiome, dietary and human metabolism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We discovered a series of newly identified metabolic signatures between both patient groups including enterolactone, 4-guanidinobutanoic acid, and methylthioadenosine sulfoxide. Additionally, the analysis revealed significant differences in several metabolic pathways such as fatty acids, alkaloids, amino acids and peptides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our observations provide novel insights into important metabolic human pathways and microbiome-derived metabolites to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis. These findings reveal systemic metabolic responses and the identified metabolites may be developed into potential biomarkers for future diagnosis to distinguish between autoimmune pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1560-1570"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529019/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144034035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Professor Lars Aabakken: A Visionary in GI Endoscopy and Medical Education. Lars Aabakken教授:GI内镜与医学教育的远见者。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70082
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
{"title":"Professor Lars Aabakken: A Visionary in GI Endoscopy and Medical Education.","authors":"Mário Dinis-Ribeiro","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70082","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70082","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1597-1599"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to "Esophageal and Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Clinical Recommendations From the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility". 对“食道和口咽吞咽困难:来自联合欧洲胃肠病学和欧洲神经胃肠病学和运动学会的临床建议”的更正。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70088
{"title":"Correction to \"Esophageal and Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Clinical Recommendations From the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70088","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70088","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1607"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144761384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025. 补充:第33届联合欧洲胃肠病学周2025。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70035
{"title":"Supplement: 33rd United European Gastroenterology Week 2025.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":"13 Suppl 8 ","pages":"S189-S802"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Balloon Catheter Versus Drill Dilator for EUS-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Stent Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 球囊导管与钻式扩张器在eus引导下放置肝胃造口支架的随机临床试验。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-06 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70044
Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Akitoshi Hakoda, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Jun Matsuno, Yuki Uba, Mitsuki Tomita, Nobuhiro Hattori, Junichi Nakamura, Kimi Bessho, Taro Iwatsubo, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Ahmad F Aboelezz, Hiroki Nishikawa

Objectives: A novel partially self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) with an anti-migration system has recently become available during Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) but requires tract dilation. No previous study has compared the performance of dilation devices during EUS-HGS. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the technical success rate of tract dilation between a balloon catheter and drill dilator technique during EUS-HGS prior to insertion of SEMS with an anti-migration system.

Methods: A single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the balloon dilation and drill dilator techniques for first-line tract dilation during EUS-HGS. The primary outcome was the initial technical success rate of tract dilation for each technique during EUS-HGS. The secondary outcome was adverse events associated with the procedures.

Results: Of 54 randomized patients who underwent EUS-HGS at our center, there were 27 in the balloon dilation group and 27 in the drill dilation group. The initial technical success rate was 92.6% (25/27) in the balloon dilation group and 100% (27/27) in the drill dilation group (p = 0.1495). The technical success rate of stent delivery system insertion was significantly higher in the balloon dilation group (88%, 22/25) than in the drill dilation group (45%, 13/27; p = 0.0013). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the balloon dilation group (mean, 9.7 min) than in the drill dilation group (mean, 14.0 min; p = 0.047). Adverse events were more frequent in the drill dilation group (7.4% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.038).

Conclusions: Balloon dilation appears more suitable than drill dilation for PCSEMS with 8.5 Fr stent delivery system deployment.

Clinical trial registration number: University Hospital Medical Information Network 000049550.

目的:一种新型的具有抗迁移系统的部分自膨胀金属支架(PCSEMS)最近在超声内镜引导的肝胃造口术(EUS-HGS)中可用,但需要扩张气道。以前没有研究比较EUS-HGS期间扩张装置的性能。这项随机对照试验的目的是评估EUS-HGS期间球囊导管和钻孔扩张器技术之间的尿道扩张技术成功率,然后再插入带有反偏移系统的SEMS。方法:一项单中心随机对照试验,比较EUS-HGS期间球囊扩张和钻孔扩张技术在一线尿道扩张中的应用。主要结果是EUS-HGS期间每种技术的初始技术扩张成功率。次要结果是与手术相关的不良事件。结果:在我们中心接受EUS-HGS的54例随机患者中,球囊扩张组27例,钻头扩张组27例。球囊扩张组的初始技术成功率为92.6%(25/27),钻孔扩张组的初始技术成功率为100% (27/27)(p = 0.1495)。球囊扩张组支架置入技术成功率(88%,22/25)明显高于钻孔扩张组(45%,13/27);p = 0.0013)。球囊扩张组手术时间(平均9.7 min)明显短于钻孔扩张组(平均14.0 min;p = 0.047)。钻孔扩张组不良事件发生率更高(7.4%比29.6%,p = 0.038)。结论:对于8.5 Fr的PCSEMS支架置入系统,球囊扩张比钻孔扩张更合适。临床试验注册号:大学医院医疗信息网000049550。
{"title":"Balloon Catheter Versus Drill Dilator for EUS-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Stent Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Takeshi Ogura, Saori Ueno, Akitoshi Hakoda, Atsushi Okuda, Nobu Nishioka, Jun Sakamoto, Jun Matsuno, Yuki Uba, Mitsuki Tomita, Nobuhiro Hattori, Junichi Nakamura, Kimi Bessho, Taro Iwatsubo, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Ahmad F Aboelezz, Hiroki Nishikawa","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ueg2.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A novel partially self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) with an anti-migration system has recently become available during Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) but requires tract dilation. No previous study has compared the performance of dilation devices during EUS-HGS. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the technical success rate of tract dilation between a balloon catheter and drill dilator technique during EUS-HGS prior to insertion of SEMS with an anti-migration system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the balloon dilation and drill dilator techniques for first-line tract dilation during EUS-HGS. The primary outcome was the initial technical success rate of tract dilation for each technique during EUS-HGS. The secondary outcome was adverse events associated with the procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 54 randomized patients who underwent EUS-HGS at our center, there were 27 in the balloon dilation group and 27 in the drill dilation group. The initial technical success rate was 92.6% (25/27) in the balloon dilation group and 100% (27/27) in the drill dilation group (p = 0.1495). The technical success rate of stent delivery system insertion was significantly higher in the balloon dilation group (88%, 22/25) than in the drill dilation group (45%, 13/27; p = 0.0013). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the balloon dilation group (mean, 9.7 min) than in the drill dilation group (mean, 14.0 min; p = 0.047). Adverse events were more frequent in the drill dilation group (7.4% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilation appears more suitable than drill dilation for PCSEMS with 8.5 Fr stent delivery system deployment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>University Hospital Medical Information Network 000049550.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1429-1437"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144050297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1