Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101015
Giovanny Leon MBA , Eduardo Gonzalez-Pier PhD , Panos Kanavos PhD , Eva Maria Ruiz de Castilla PhD , Gerardo Machinicki PhD
Objectives
The World Health Organization provides 10 specific guidelines for managing the prices of pharmaceutical products. Many of those are widely known and used such as reference pricing, value-based pricing, price transparency, and tendering. Less attention and knowledge is concentrated in markup regulation across the pharmaceutical supply chain and distribution and in tax exemptions or reductions. This article quantifies the impact of these price components in the Latin American (LatAm) region and places the findings in the context of economic theory and international policy experiences.
Methods
2020 retail pharmaceutical sales data from 8 major LatAm markets covered in the IQVIA database were decomposed into ex-factory, distributor markups, and taxes using price build up information and the Price Decipher Methodology developed by the Novartis Global Pricing Governance and Negotiation team. The findings were reviewed by an international panel representing academia, health policy, health economics, patient, and industry.
Results
The ex-factory market value of the analyzed markets was $49 billion. Distribution markups added $20 billion and taxes a further $10.5 billion. This represented a 63% increase over ex-factory prices, considered high if compared with 24% for an international benchmark of 35 ex-LatAm countries. Reducing markups for these LatAm countries to 24% would represent up to $19 billion in savings for payers and patients.
Conclusions
There is potential for significant cost reductions associated with tax and distribution markup refinements in the LatAm retail pharmaceutical market. National policies should be informed by additional context-specific research for effective implementation.
{"title":"The 30-Billion-Dollar Distribution Markups and Taxes of Pharmaceuticals in Latin American Countries: Impact, Options, and Trade-Offs","authors":"Giovanny Leon MBA , Eduardo Gonzalez-Pier PhD , Panos Kanavos PhD , Eva Maria Ruiz de Castilla PhD , Gerardo Machinicki PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The World Health Organization provides 10 specific guidelines for managing the prices of pharmaceutical products. Many of those are widely known and used such as reference pricing, value-based pricing, price transparency, and tendering. Less attention and knowledge is concentrated in markup regulation across the pharmaceutical supply chain and distribution and in tax exemptions or reductions. This article quantifies the impact of these price components in the Latin American (LatAm) region and places the findings in the context of economic theory and international policy experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>2020 retail pharmaceutical sales data from 8 major LatAm markets covered in the IQVIA database were decomposed into ex-factory, distributor markups, and taxes using price build up information and the Price Decipher Methodology developed by the Novartis Global Pricing Governance and Negotiation team. The findings were reviewed by an international panel representing academia, health policy, health economics, patient, and industry.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ex-factory market value of the analyzed markets was $49 billion. Distribution markups added $20 billion and taxes a further $10.5 billion. This represented a 63% increase over ex-factory prices, considered high if compared with 24% for an international benchmark of 35 ex-LatAm countries. Reducing markups for these LatAm countries to 24% would represent up to $19 billion in savings for payers and patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is potential for significant cost reductions associated with tax and distribution markup refinements in the LatAm retail pharmaceutical market. National policies should be informed by additional context-specific research for effective implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101015"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141543268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-26DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101004
Abeer Al Rabayah BPharm, MBA, MSc , Rawan Al Froukh MSc , Razan Sawalha MSc , Maali Al Shnekat PharmD , Beate Jahn PhD , Uwe Siebert ScD , Saad M. Jaddoua BPharm, RPh
Objectives
To assess the cost-effectiveness of maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care (BSC) in non–small cell lung cancer patients from a Jordanian healthcare system perspective.
Methods
A Markov model with 4 health states was developed to estimate life years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), costs, and the incremental cost-utility ratio of pemetrexed plus BSC versus BSC. A lifelong time horizon was used in the base-case analysis. The transition probabilities were estimated from the PARAMOUNT trial, the utility weights were taken from published literature, and costs were based on data and unit costs at King Hussein Cancer Center and the Jordan Food and Drug Administration. Both costs and outcomes were discounted using a 3%. The parameter uncertainty was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
Results
The base-case analysis showed that pemetrexed plus BSC increased QALYs and cost compared with BSC. Pemetrexed plus BSC leads to incremental 0.255 QALYs and incremental costs of US $30 826, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio of US $120 886/QALY.
The results were sensitive to changes in the utility estimates during the progression-free health state, the progression health state, and the cost of postprogression medications The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of pemetrexed plus BSC being a cost-effective option compared with BSC is 0 at a threshold of $56 000.
Conclusions
Maintenance pemetrexed for non–small cell lung cancer is not a cost-effective option compared with BSC from a healthcare system perspective based on the listed price at a threshold of $56 000/QALY.
{"title":"Cost-Utility Analysis of Maintenance Pemetrexed Plus Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Treating Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in Jordan","authors":"Abeer Al Rabayah BPharm, MBA, MSc , Rawan Al Froukh MSc , Razan Sawalha MSc , Maali Al Shnekat PharmD , Beate Jahn PhD , Uwe Siebert ScD , Saad M. Jaddoua BPharm, RPh","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the cost-effectiveness of maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care (BSC) in non–small cell lung cancer patients from a Jordanian healthcare system perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Markov model with 4 health states was developed to estimate life years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), costs, and the incremental cost-utility ratio of pemetrexed plus BSC versus BSC. A lifelong time horizon was used in the base-case analysis. The transition probabilities were estimated from the PARAMOUNT trial, the utility weights were taken from published literature, and costs were based on data and unit costs at King Hussein Cancer Center and the Jordan Food and Drug Administration. Both costs and outcomes were discounted using a 3%. The parameter uncertainty was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The base-case analysis showed that pemetrexed plus BSC increased QALYs and cost compared with BSC. Pemetrexed plus BSC leads to incremental 0.255 QALYs and incremental costs of US $30 826, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio of US $120 886/QALY.</p><p>The results were sensitive to changes in the utility estimates during the progression-free health state, the progression health state, and the cost of postprogression medications The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of pemetrexed plus BSC being a cost-effective option compared with BSC is 0 at a threshold of $56 000.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Maintenance pemetrexed for non–small cell lung cancer is not a cost-effective option compared with BSC from a healthcare system perspective based on the listed price at a threshold of $56 000/QALY.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101004"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-25DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101008
Arun M. Jones MSc , Victoria Serra-Sastre PhD , Hansoo Kim PhD
Objectives
In this article, we estimate the initial and temporal impacts of generic entry on benchmark drug prices as reimbursed through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme of Australia and the degree to which further generic competition affects these prices under the current regulatory framework.
Methods
We construct a panel data set consisting of 781 Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listed drugs over a 95-month time period and use fixed-effect regressions. The dynamic price effects of generic competition are investigated by implementing panel methods.
Results
Our results suggest that generic entry into the Australian pharmaceutical market causes significant initial price reductions of approximately 31% and that successive generic entrants also act to further reduce drug prices. Through subgroup analyses, we identify that the effect of generic competition varies significantly according to the drug’s therapeutic group and mode of drug administration and the dynamic analysis indicates that generic entry results in continuous price reductions even after large initial drops.
Conclusions
Generic competition reduces reimbursed drug prices in Australia to a greater extent than previous research has identified, although the average price effects can vary significantly depending on a drug’s therapeutic group or mode of drug administration. Prices generally continue to fall significantly over time under the price disclosure mechanism.
{"title":"The Impact of Generic Entry of Pharmaceuticals in Australia","authors":"Arun M. Jones MSc , Victoria Serra-Sastre PhD , Hansoo Kim PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In this article, we estimate the initial and temporal impacts of generic entry on benchmark drug prices as reimbursed through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme of Australia and the degree to which further generic competition affects these prices under the current regulatory framework.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We construct a panel data set consisting of 781 Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listed drugs over a 95-month time period and use fixed-effect regressions. The dynamic price effects of generic competition are investigated by implementing panel methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our results suggest that generic entry into the Australian pharmaceutical market causes significant initial price reductions of approximately 31% and that successive generic entrants also act to further reduce drug prices. Through subgroup analyses, we identify that the effect of generic competition varies significantly according to the drug’s therapeutic group and mode of drug administration and the dynamic analysis indicates that generic entry results in continuous price reductions even after large initial drops.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Generic competition reduces reimbursed drug prices in Australia to a greater extent than previous research has identified, although the average price effects can vary significantly depending on a drug’s therapeutic group or mode of drug administration. Prices generally continue to fall significantly over time under the price disclosure mechanism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000414/pdfft?md5=e2ad804df53b75000f8b051e8d09ecac&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000414-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-25DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101019
Juliana Tereza Coneglian de Almeida MS , Rodrigo Bazan MD, PhD , Sarah Nascimento Silva PhD , Lukas Fernando Silva MD , Juliana Machado Rugolo PhD , Mônica Aparecida de Paula de Sordi MS , Carlos Clayton Macedo de Freitas MD, PhD , Vania dos Santos Nunes-Nogueira MD, PhD
<div><h3>Objetivo</h3><p>mensurar o custo direto médico do tratamento do Acidente Vascular Isquêmico agudo (AVCi) na perspectiva de um hospital público (HCFMB) e compará-lo com o repasse pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), por meio do Sistema de Gerenciamento da Tabela de Procedimentos, Medicamentos, Órteses/Próteses e Materiais Especiais do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIGTAP).</p></div><div><h3>Metodologia</h3><p>trata-se de um estudo de microcusteio, a partir da quantidade de pacientes internados por AVCi no ano de 2019 foram computados o custo do hospital e o faturamento SIGTAP para os cenários: padrão (1); alteplase (2); alteplase e trombectomia mecânica (3); trombectomia mecânica (4). Os custos do hospital foram ajustados pela inflação do período por meio do <em>CCEMG-EPPI-Centre Cost Converter.</em></p></div><div><h3>Resultados</h3><p>em 2019 foram hospitalizados 258 pacientes devido AVCi, 89,5% no cenário 1, 8% no cenário 2, 1,5% no cenário 3, 1% no cenário 4. Na perspectiva do hospital o custo por paciente foi estimado em R$7.780,13, R$15.741,23, R$28.988,49, R$25.739,79, para os cenários 1, 2 ,3 e 4, respectivamente. O valor faturado pelo SIGTAP foi estimado em R$3.079,87, R$5.417,21, R$10.901,92, R$10.286,28, respectivamente. Se a trombectomia mecânica tivesse sido incluída neste repasse, os dois últimos faturamentos seriam R$ 25.393,34 e R$24.248,89.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusão</h3><p>o custo do tratamento do AVCi para o hospital em 2019 foi estimado em R$2.295.209, o repasse SUS em R$889.391,54. Com a inclusão da trombectomia mecânica ao faturamento SIGTAP, este repasse seria de R$975.282,44, e o desfalque do custo HCFMB por paciente em relação ao faturado pelo SUS é maior nos cenários sem este procedimento.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To measure the direct cost of treating acute ischemic stroke (IS) from the perspective of a public hospital in Brazil (HCFMB) and compare it with the reimbursement by the Unified Health System (SUS), through the Procedure Table Management System, Medicines, Orthoses/Prostheses and Special Materials of the Unified Health System (SIGTAP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a micro-costing study; four scenarios were evaluated: standard (1); alteplase (2); alteplase and mechanical thrombectomy (3); mechanical thrombectomy (4). Based on the number of patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke in 2019, hospital cost, and SUS billing were calculated for each scenario. Hospital costs were adjusted for inflation using CCEMG-EPPI-Centre Cost Converter.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 2019, 258 patients were hospitalized due to IS, 89.5% in scenario 1, 8% in scenario 2, 1.5% in scenario 3, 1% in scenario 4. From the hospital's perspective, the cost per patient was estimated at R$7780.13, R$15 741.23, R$28 988.49, R$25 739.79, for scenarios 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The reimbursement by SIGTAP was estimated at R$3079.87, R$5417.21, R$10 901.92, R$10 286.28, respectively. If thrombectomy had been
{"title":"Custo Direto do Tratamento do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Isquêmico na Perspectiva de um Hospital Público Terciário (Direct Cost of Treating Ischemic Stroke From the Perspective of a Tertiary Public Hospital)","authors":"Juliana Tereza Coneglian de Almeida MS , Rodrigo Bazan MD, PhD , Sarah Nascimento Silva PhD , Lukas Fernando Silva MD , Juliana Machado Rugolo PhD , Mônica Aparecida de Paula de Sordi MS , Carlos Clayton Macedo de Freitas MD, PhD , Vania dos Santos Nunes-Nogueira MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objetivo</h3><p>mensurar o custo direto médico do tratamento do Acidente Vascular Isquêmico agudo (AVCi) na perspectiva de um hospital público (HCFMB) e compará-lo com o repasse pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), por meio do Sistema de Gerenciamento da Tabela de Procedimentos, Medicamentos, Órteses/Próteses e Materiais Especiais do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIGTAP).</p></div><div><h3>Metodologia</h3><p>trata-se de um estudo de microcusteio, a partir da quantidade de pacientes internados por AVCi no ano de 2019 foram computados o custo do hospital e o faturamento SIGTAP para os cenários: padrão (1); alteplase (2); alteplase e trombectomia mecânica (3); trombectomia mecânica (4). Os custos do hospital foram ajustados pela inflação do período por meio do <em>CCEMG-EPPI-Centre Cost Converter.</em></p></div><div><h3>Resultados</h3><p>em 2019 foram hospitalizados 258 pacientes devido AVCi, 89,5% no cenário 1, 8% no cenário 2, 1,5% no cenário 3, 1% no cenário 4. Na perspectiva do hospital o custo por paciente foi estimado em R$7.780,13, R$15.741,23, R$28.988,49, R$25.739,79, para os cenários 1, 2 ,3 e 4, respectivamente. O valor faturado pelo SIGTAP foi estimado em R$3.079,87, R$5.417,21, R$10.901,92, R$10.286,28, respectivamente. Se a trombectomia mecânica tivesse sido incluída neste repasse, os dois últimos faturamentos seriam R$ 25.393,34 e R$24.248,89.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusão</h3><p>o custo do tratamento do AVCi para o hospital em 2019 foi estimado em R$2.295.209, o repasse SUS em R$889.391,54. Com a inclusão da trombectomia mecânica ao faturamento SIGTAP, este repasse seria de R$975.282,44, e o desfalque do custo HCFMB por paciente em relação ao faturado pelo SUS é maior nos cenários sem este procedimento.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To measure the direct cost of treating acute ischemic stroke (IS) from the perspective of a public hospital in Brazil (HCFMB) and compare it with the reimbursement by the Unified Health System (SUS), through the Procedure Table Management System, Medicines, Orthoses/Prostheses and Special Materials of the Unified Health System (SIGTAP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a micro-costing study; four scenarios were evaluated: standard (1); alteplase (2); alteplase and mechanical thrombectomy (3); mechanical thrombectomy (4). Based on the number of patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke in 2019, hospital cost, and SUS billing were calculated for each scenario. Hospital costs were adjusted for inflation using CCEMG-EPPI-Centre Cost Converter.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 2019, 258 patients were hospitalized due to IS, 89.5% in scenario 1, 8% in scenario 2, 1.5% in scenario 3, 1% in scenario 4. From the hospital's perspective, the cost per patient was estimated at R$7780.13, R$15 741.23, R$28 988.49, R$25 739.79, for scenarios 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The reimbursement by SIGTAP was estimated at R$3079.87, R$5417.21, R$10 901.92, R$10 286.28, respectively. If thrombectomy had been","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101019"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-24DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101016
Winifred E. Owusu PhD , Johanita R. Burger PhD , Martie S. Lubbe PhD , Rianda Joubert PhD
Objective
Before June 2022, the treatment cost of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) in Ghana was mainly borne by the child’s family or caregiver. We determined the treatment cost of BL in children and its psychological impact on parents and caregivers.
Method
This prospective observational study assessed the direct medical and nonmedical costs (US dollars [USD]) incurred during the treatment of a child with BL for 6 consecutive months using a cost diary. Productivity losses and the psychological impact on parents and caregivers were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire and the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC).
Results
Of the 25 participants, 7 abandoned the treatment of their children, and 4 withdrew because the children passed away. The median (Q1, Q3) cost for treating BL per child for caregivers/parents (N = 12) was USD 947.42 (USD 763.03, USD 1953.05). Direct medical costs formed 71% (USD 11 458.97) of total treatment costs. Working hours of parents before the child’s cancer diagnosis decreased from a median (Q1, Q3) of 44.00 (20.00, 66.00) hours to 1.50 (0, 20.00) hours after the diagnosis. The mean (SD) CQOLC score was 107.92 (15.89), with higher scores in men (111.00 [17.26]), married participants (111.26 [17.29]), Higher National Diploma certificate holders (113.00 [1.41]), and participants earning a monthly income more than USD 84.60.
Conclusion
Treatment costs reduced the overall household income of 5 families. Parents and caregivers experienced reduced work hours and loss of employment. CQOLC scores were higher in married participants, those with a higher educational background, and those with higher income.
{"title":"Treatment Cost and Psychological Impact of Burkitt Lymphoma on Ghanaian Families and Caregivers","authors":"Winifred E. Owusu PhD , Johanita R. Burger PhD , Martie S. Lubbe PhD , Rianda Joubert PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Before June 2022, the treatment cost of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) in Ghana was mainly borne by the child’s family or caregiver. We determined the treatment cost of BL in children and its psychological impact on parents and caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This prospective observational study assessed the direct medical and nonmedical costs (US dollars [USD]) incurred during the treatment of a child with BL for 6 consecutive months using a cost diary. Productivity losses and the psychological impact on parents and caregivers were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire and the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 25 participants, 7 abandoned the treatment of their children, and 4 withdrew because the children passed away. The median (Q1, Q3) cost for treating BL per child for caregivers/parents (N = 12) was USD 947.42 (USD 763.03, USD 1953.05). Direct medical costs formed 71% (USD 11 458.97) of total treatment costs. Working hours of parents before the child’s cancer diagnosis decreased from a median (Q1, Q3) of 44.00 (20.00, 66.00) hours to 1.50 (0, 20.00) hours after the diagnosis. The mean (SD) CQOLC score was 107.92 (15.89), with higher scores in men (111.00 [17.26]), married participants (111.26 [17.29]), Higher National Diploma certificate holders (113.00 [1.41]), and participants earning a monthly income more than USD 84.60.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Treatment costs reduced the overall household income of 5 families. Parents and caregivers experienced reduced work hours and loss of employment. CQOLC scores were higher in married participants, those with a higher educational background, and those with higher income.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101016"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000499/pdfft?md5=176ef4039bb4e134d6217d394db1de05&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000499-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141451636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-20DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101017
Elly Nuwamanya MSc , Sylvia Cornelia Nassiwa MD , Andreas Kuznik PhD , Catriona Waitt PhD , Thokozile Malaba PhD , Landon Myer PhD , Angela Colbers PhD , Jim Read , Duolao Wang PhD , Mohammed Lamorde PhD
Objectives
Dolutegravir (DTG) has proved to be more efficacious, tolerable, and safer than efavirenz (EFV) among mothers living with HIV and their infants in Uganda. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the DTG-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) compared with the standard of care for preventing perinatal transmissions among pregnant women initiating ART in late pregnancy in Uganda.
Methods
We used data from a randomized open-label trial (DolPHIN-2) and a 2-part cost-effectiveness model composed of a short-term decision tree to estimate the perinatal transmission rate and costs and an individual-based 3-state Markov model (HIV, advanced HIV, dead) to estimate the long-term costs and health outcomes from the Ugandan payer perspective using a lifetime horizon and a 1-year Markov cycle. The main outcomes were the mean annual costs in US dollars ($), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Both the deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the effect of parameter uncertainties on the ultimate results and the model’s robustness.
Results
Compared with the EFV-based ART, the DTG-based ART was associated with fewer mean annual costs ($43.58 vs $68.44) and DALYs (0.33 vs 0.56), leading to cost savings of $110 per DALY averted. In the incremental analysis, the DTG-based ART dominated the EFV-based ART; that is, it was less costly and more effective. These results were robust to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion
The DTG-based ART is a highly cost-effective strategy compared with the EFV-based ART among women initiating treatment in the third trimester of pregnancy in a low-income setting.
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Dolutegravir Compared With Efavirenz for Prevention of Perinatal Transmission in Women Presenting With HIV in Late Pregnancy in Uganda","authors":"Elly Nuwamanya MSc , Sylvia Cornelia Nassiwa MD , Andreas Kuznik PhD , Catriona Waitt PhD , Thokozile Malaba PhD , Landon Myer PhD , Angela Colbers PhD , Jim Read , Duolao Wang PhD , Mohammed Lamorde PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Dolutegravir (DTG) has proved to be more efficacious, tolerable, and safer than efavirenz (EFV) among mothers living with HIV and their infants in Uganda. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the DTG-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) compared with the standard of care for preventing perinatal transmissions among pregnant women initiating ART in late pregnancy in Uganda.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used data from a randomized open-label trial (DolPHIN-2) and a 2-part cost-effectiveness model composed of a short-term decision tree to estimate the perinatal transmission rate and costs and an individual-based 3-state Markov model (HIV, advanced HIV, dead) to estimate the long-term costs and health outcomes from the Ugandan payer perspective using a lifetime horizon and a 1-year Markov cycle. The main outcomes were the mean annual costs in US dollars ($), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Both the deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the effect of parameter uncertainties on the ultimate results and the model’s robustness.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with the EFV-based ART, the DTG-based ART was associated with fewer mean annual costs ($43.58 vs $68.44) and DALYs (0.33 vs 0.56), leading to cost savings of $110 per DALY averted. In the incremental analysis, the DTG-based ART dominated the EFV-based ART; that is, it was less costly and more effective. These results were robust to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The DTG-based ART is a highly cost-effective strategy compared with the EFV-based ART among women initiating treatment in the third trimester of pregnancy in a low-income setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 101017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141434858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-11DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101007
Tsen-Fang Tsai MD , Yao-Hsien Huang MD , Ching-Yun Wei MSc , Khai Jing Ng MD , Rachel S. Newson PhD , Tzu-Han Hanna Lee PhD , Dereck Shen MS , Bruce C.M. Wang PhD , Chao-Hsiun Tang PhD
Objectives
This study investigated the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and resource utilization in patients with alopecia areata (AA) in Taiwan using the National Health Insurance Research Database. AA severity was determined by treatment use and diagnostic codes in the year after enrollment (including corticosteroids, systemic immunosuppressants, topical immunotherapy, and phototherapy).
Methods
The cross-sectional analysis was conducted to estimate the incidence and prevalence of AA from 2016 to 2020. For the longitudinal analysis, 2 cohorts were identified: mild/moderate and severe. The cohorts were matched based on age, gender, and comorbidities. Patients were enrolled upon their first claim with an AA diagnosis during the index period of 2017-2018.
Results
The number of patients with AA increased from 3221 in 2016 to 3855 in 2020. The longitudinal analysis identified 1808 mild/moderate patients and 452 severe patients. Mild/moderate patients used higher levels of topical corticosteroids (82.41%) than severe patients (73.45%). Conversely, severe patients used more topical nonsteroids (41.81%) and systemic therapies (51.77%) than mild/moderate patients (0.44% and 16.15%, respectively). Oral glucocorticoids use was higher in severe patients (47.57%) relative to mild/moderate patients (14.88%), whereas the use of injectable forms was similar. The most used systemic immunosuppressants were methotrexate, cyclosporin, and azathioprine. Topical immunotherapy utilization decreased with subsequent treatment lines for severe patients. Treatment persistence at 6 months was low for all treatments. Severe patients had higher annual AA-related outpatient visits than the mild/moderate cohort.
Conclusions
These findings highlight the need for additional innovations and therapies to address the clinical and economic burden of AA.
{"title":"Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Resource Utilization Study of Patients With Alopecia Areata in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database","authors":"Tsen-Fang Tsai MD , Yao-Hsien Huang MD , Ching-Yun Wei MSc , Khai Jing Ng MD , Rachel S. Newson PhD , Tzu-Han Hanna Lee PhD , Dereck Shen MS , Bruce C.M. Wang PhD , Chao-Hsiun Tang PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study investigated the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and resource utilization in patients with alopecia areata (AA) in Taiwan using the National Health Insurance Research Database. AA severity was determined by treatment use and diagnostic codes in the year after enrollment (including corticosteroids, systemic immunosuppressants, topical immunotherapy, and phototherapy).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The cross-sectional analysis was conducted to estimate the incidence and prevalence of AA from 2016 to 2020. For the longitudinal analysis, 2 cohorts were identified: mild/moderate and severe. The cohorts were matched based on age, gender, and comorbidities. Patients were enrolled upon their first claim with an AA diagnosis during the index period of 2017-2018.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The number of patients with AA increased from 3221 in 2016 to 3855 in 2020. The longitudinal analysis identified 1808 mild/moderate patients and 452 severe patients. Mild/moderate patients used higher levels of topical corticosteroids (82.41%) than severe patients (73.45%). Conversely, severe patients used more topical nonsteroids (41.81%) and systemic therapies (51.77%) than mild/moderate patients (0.44% and 16.15%, respectively). Oral glucocorticoids use was higher in severe patients (47.57%) relative to mild/moderate patients (14.88%), whereas the use of injectable forms was similar. The most used systemic immunosuppressants were methotrexate, cyclosporin, and azathioprine. Topical immunotherapy utilization decreased with subsequent treatment lines for severe patients. Treatment persistence at 6 months was low for all treatments. Severe patients had higher annual AA-related outpatient visits than the mild/moderate cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings highlight the need for additional innovations and therapies to address the clinical and economic burden of AA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000402/pdfft?md5=816519282c8517dbf2e7df9a12dfccd3&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000402-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141302928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-10DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101009
Gabriela Sarmiento MD , Johana Benavides MSc , Carlos A. Trujillo PhD , Nidya P. Velosa MD , Analhí Palomino MD , Luisa F. Rodríguez MD , Marcela A. Erazo MSc , Adriana J. Ávila Econ
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the “Value-Based Healthcare” concept of an integrated palliative care (PC) program in Bogotá, Colombia, through the measurement of health outcomes and care costs in the last 3 months of life.
Methods
A multicenter, retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥18 years old who died in 2020 due to medical conditions amenable to PC. The measured health outcomes included pain, wellbeing, comfort, quality of life (QOL), and satisfaction. We analyzed the behavior of overall care costs during the last 3 months of the patients’ lives and controlled for the effect of exposure to the program, considering the disease type and insurance coverage, using a linear regression model, nearest-neighbor matching, and sensitivity analysis.
Results
Among patients exposed to the program, the mean pain score was 2.1/10 (± 1.3) and wellbeing was rated at 3.5/10 (± 1.0), comfort at 1.6/24 (± 1.3), QOL at 3.6/5.0 (± 0.17), and satisfaction at 9.3/100 (± 0.15). The positive changes in these scores were greater for patients who remained in the program for over 3 months. Cost reduction was demonstrated in the last 90 days of life, with statistically significant and chronologically progressive savings during the last 30 days of life exceeding 5 million pesos per patient (P < .05).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated the success of PC in reducing pain, improving wellbeing and QOL, providing comfort, and ensuring high levels of satisfaction. Moreover, PC is an effective value-based healthcare strategy and can significantly enhance the efficiency of healthcare services by reducing end-of-life healthcare costs.
{"title":"Evaluation of the Concept of Value-Based Healthcare Applied to an Integrated Palliative Care Program in Colombia","authors":"Gabriela Sarmiento MD , Johana Benavides MSc , Carlos A. Trujillo PhD , Nidya P. Velosa MD , Analhí Palomino MD , Luisa F. Rodríguez MD , Marcela A. Erazo MSc , Adriana J. Ávila Econ","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the “Value-Based Healthcare” concept of an integrated palliative care (PC) program in Bogotá, Colombia, through the measurement of health outcomes and care costs in the last 3 months of life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multicenter, retrospective cohort study that included patients ≥18 years old who died in 2020 due to medical conditions amenable to PC. The measured health outcomes included pain, wellbeing, comfort, quality of life (QOL), and satisfaction. We analyzed the behavior of overall care costs during the last 3 months of the patients’ lives and controlled for the effect of exposure to the program, considering the disease type and insurance coverage, using a linear regression model, nearest-neighbor matching, and sensitivity analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among patients exposed to the program, the mean pain score was 2.1/10 (± 1.3) and wellbeing was rated at 3.5/10 (± 1.0), comfort at 1.6/24 (± 1.3), QOL at 3.6/5.0 (± 0.17), and satisfaction at 9.3/100 (± 0.15). The positive changes in these scores were greater for patients who remained in the program for over 3 months. Cost reduction was demonstrated in the last 90 days of life, with statistically significant and chronologically progressive savings during the last 30 days of life exceeding 5 million pesos per patient (<em>P</em> < .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrated the success of PC in reducing pain, improving wellbeing and QOL, providing comfort, and ensuring high levels of satisfaction. Moreover, PC is an effective value-based healthcare strategy and can significantly enhance the efficiency of healthcare services by reducing end-of-life healthcare costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141297958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-10DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101012
Khalid A. Alnaqbi MBBS, MSc , Amin Mohamed Elshamy PhD , Nicole Gebran PharmD , Sahar Fahmy PhD , Sara Aldallal MSc , Nada Korra PharmD , Ahmad Nader Fasseeh PhD , Zoltán Kaló PhD
Objectives
Healthcare research and development have accelerated at an unprecedented rate creating a challenge even for high-income countries to finance all new technologies. Health technology assessment (HTA) aims to maximize health gains out of available resources. Our study aimed to provide tailor-made recommendations for HTA implementation in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Methods
We conducted a policy survey to explore the gap between the current and preferred future environment of HTA implementation in the UAE. The survey was distributed in 2 workshops discussing the importance of HTA implementation, and results were further aggregated to yield a list of draft recommendations. Recommendations were then assessed for their feasibility in a round table discussion with experts in the field to generate actions for HTA implementation.
Results
Survey results and round table discussion indicated the need to leverage HTA for value-based decision making. Experts confirmed the unmet need for broader coverage of graduate and postgraduate HTA training with the aim of specific PhD programs in the UAE. Public funding for HTA appraisals and expanding the scope of HTA to nonpharmaceuticals was recommended. Furthermore, experts recommended that several HTA bodies should be coordinated centrally and highlighted the importance of having an explicit soft cost-effectiveness threshold for common technologies and a higher threshold for orphan drugs.
Conclusions
Although HTA in the UAE is still in its early stages, strong initiatives are being taken for its implementation. Our survey results served as a step in developing a detailed action plan for HTA implementation that will enhance the sustainability of the healthcare system.
{"title":"Consensus-Based Recommendations for the Implementation of Health Technology Assessment in the United Arab Emirates","authors":"Khalid A. Alnaqbi MBBS, MSc , Amin Mohamed Elshamy PhD , Nicole Gebran PharmD , Sahar Fahmy PhD , Sara Aldallal MSc , Nada Korra PharmD , Ahmad Nader Fasseeh PhD , Zoltán Kaló PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Healthcare research and development have accelerated at an unprecedented rate creating a challenge even for high-income countries to finance all new technologies. Health technology assessment (HTA) aims to maximize health gains out of available resources. Our study aimed to provide tailor-made recommendations for HTA implementation in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a policy survey to explore the gap between the current and preferred future environment of HTA implementation in the UAE. The survey was distributed in 2 workshops discussing the importance of HTA implementation, and results were further aggregated to yield a list of draft recommendations. Recommendations were then assessed for their feasibility in a round table discussion with experts in the field to generate actions for HTA implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Survey results and round table discussion indicated the need to leverage HTA for value-based decision making. Experts confirmed the unmet need for broader coverage of graduate and postgraduate HTA training with the aim of specific PhD programs in the UAE. Public funding for HTA appraisals and expanding the scope of HTA to nonpharmaceuticals was recommended. Furthermore, experts recommended that several HTA bodies should be coordinated centrally and highlighted the importance of having an explicit soft cost-effectiveness threshold for common technologies and a higher threshold for orphan drugs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although HTA in the UAE is still in its early stages, strong initiatives are being taken for its implementation. Our survey results served as a step in developing a detailed action plan for HTA implementation that will enhance the sustainability of the healthcare system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000451/pdfft?md5=edd4ad7c7632fe0e9000228ec749b451&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000451-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141297833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-09DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101006
Kalin Werner PhD , Willem Stassen PhD , Elzarie Theron MA , Lee A. Wallis PhD , Tracy K. Lin PhD
Objective
This study examined the trade-offs low-resource setting community members were willing to make in regard to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care using a discrete choice experiment survey.
Methods
We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to a sample of community members 18 years or older across South Africa between April and May 2022. Participants were presented with 18 paired choice tasks comprised of 5 attributes (distance to closest adequate facility, provider of care, response time, chances of survival, and transport cost) and a range of 3 to 5 levels. We used mixed logit models to evaluate respondents’ preferences for selected attributes.
Results
Analyses were based on 2228 responses and 40 104 choice tasks. Patients valued care with the shortest response time, delivered by the highest qualified individuals, which placed them within the shortest distance of an adequate facility, gave them the highest chance of survival, and costed the least. In addition, patients preferred care delivered by their family members over care delivered by the lay public. The highest mean willingness-to-pay for increased survival is 11 699 South African rand (ZAR), followed by distance to health facility (8108 ZAR), and response time (5678 ZAR), and the lowest for increasing specialization of provider (1287 ZAR).
Conclusions
In low-resource settings, it may align with patients’ preference to include targeted resuscitation training for family members of individuals with high-risk for cardiac arrest as a part of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest intervention strategies.
{"title":"Patient Preferences for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Care in South Africa: A Discrete Choice Experiment","authors":"Kalin Werner PhD , Willem Stassen PhD , Elzarie Theron MA , Lee A. Wallis PhD , Tracy K. Lin PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examined the trade-offs low-resource setting community members were willing to make in regard to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care using a discrete choice experiment survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to a sample of community members 18 years or older across South Africa between April and May 2022. Participants were presented with 18 paired choice tasks comprised of 5 attributes (distance to closest adequate facility, provider of care, response time, chances of survival, and transport cost) and a range of 3 to 5 levels. We used mixed logit models to evaluate respondents’ preferences for selected attributes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analyses were based on 2228 responses and 40 104 choice tasks. Patients valued care with the shortest response time, delivered by the highest qualified individuals, which placed them within the shortest distance of an adequate facility, gave them the highest chance of survival, and costed the least. In addition, patients preferred care delivered by their family members over care delivered by the lay public. The highest mean willingness-to-pay for increased survival is 11 699 South African rand (ZAR), followed by distance to health facility (8108 ZAR), and response time (5678 ZAR), and the lowest for increasing specialization of provider (1287 ZAR).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In low-resource settings, it may align with patients’ preference to include targeted resuscitation training for family members of individuals with high-risk for cardiac arrest as a part of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest intervention strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101006"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000396/pdfft?md5=908de7dd839dad11e6a6c014a052c2f4&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000396-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141294851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}