Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-13DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251315071
Smaragda Lampridou, Tania Domun, Javiera Rosenberg, Rachael Lear, Alun Huw Davies, Mary Wells, Gaby Judah
Adherence to guideline-recommended therapies for peripheral artery disease (PAD), including pharmacotherapy (antiplatelet, lipid-lowering, and antihypertensive agents) and lifestyle modifications (smoking cessation, diet, weight management, and physical activity) remains low. Though single-component interventions targeting smoking cessation, exercise, or medication adherence show some efficacy, comprehensive multicomponent interventions are vital for addressing the complexity of PAD management. This review systematically synthesized multicomponent interventions for patients with PAD. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest, and Google Scholar to identify primary research describing multicomponent interventions supporting PAD treatment adherence, published between 2007 and 2024. A narrative synthesis was reported using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and the behavioral change techniques (BCT) taxonomy. Out of 15 studies (2462 patients, 60.4% men) included in this review, only two addressed all guideline-recommended treatment aspects. Key intervention components included structured exercise (12/15) and education programs (10/15). Most interventions were delivered by multidisciplinary teams in hospital settings over 3 months. Only one study employed behavioral theory in its development, and most interventions (13/15) focused on the BCT 'instructions on how to perform a behavior' rather than diverse BCTs. No interventions significantly increased adherence to all PAD therapies. Few studies measured the intervention's impact on adherence, making it difficult to determine effective intervention characteristics. Most interventions lacked behavioral science approaches and were not designed to address specific adherence determinants. Future interventions should incorporate these elements to effectively address patients' needs. Open Science Framework Registry ID: osf.io/7xqzj.
外周动脉疾病(PAD)的指南推荐疗法,包括药物治疗(抗血小板、降脂和降压药)和生活方式改变(戒烟、饮食、体重管理和体育活动)的依从性仍然很低。虽然针对戒烟、运动或药物依从性的单组分干预显示出一些效果,但综合多组分干预对于解决PAD管理的复杂性至关重要。本综述系统地综合了PAD患者的多组分干预措施。在Embase、MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、APA PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science Core Collection、ProQuest和谷歌Scholar中进行了系统检索,以确定2007年至2024年间发表的描述支持PAD治疗依从性的多组分干预措施的主要研究。使用干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)检查表和行为改变技术(BCT)分类法进行叙事综合。在本综述纳入的15项研究(2462例患者,60.4%为男性)中,只有两项研究涉及指南推荐的所有治疗方面。主要干预内容包括结构化锻炼(12/15)和教育项目(10/15)。大多数干预措施由多学科小组在医院环境中提供,时间超过3个月。只有一项研究在其发展过程中采用了行为理论,大多数干预措施(13/15)侧重于BCT“关于如何执行行为的指示”,而不是各种BCT。无干预显著增加了所有PAD治疗的依从性。很少有研究测量干预对依从性的影响,因此很难确定有效的干预特征。大多数干预措施缺乏行为科学方法,并不是为了解决特定的依从性决定因素而设计的。未来的干预措施应纳入这些要素,以有效地满足患者的需求。开放科学框架注册表ID: osf.io/7xqzj。
{"title":"Multicomponent interventions designed to support adherence to guideline-recommended therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease: A scoping review.","authors":"Smaragda Lampridou, Tania Domun, Javiera Rosenberg, Rachael Lear, Alun Huw Davies, Mary Wells, Gaby Judah","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251315071","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251315071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adherence to guideline-recommended therapies for peripheral artery disease (PAD), including pharmacotherapy (antiplatelet, lipid-lowering, and antihypertensive agents) and lifestyle modifications (smoking cessation, diet, weight management, and physical activity) remains low. Though single-component interventions targeting smoking cessation, exercise, or medication adherence show some efficacy, comprehensive multicomponent interventions are vital for addressing the complexity of PAD management. This review systematically synthesized multicomponent interventions for patients with PAD. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest, and Google Scholar to identify primary research describing multicomponent interventions supporting PAD treatment adherence, published between 2007 and 2024. A narrative synthesis was reported using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and the behavioral change techniques (BCT) taxonomy. Out of 15 studies (2462 patients, 60.4% men) included in this review, only two addressed all guideline-recommended treatment aspects. Key intervention components included structured exercise (12/15) and education programs (10/15). Most interventions were delivered by multidisciplinary teams in hospital settings over 3 months. Only one study employed behavioral theory in its development, and most interventions (13/15) focused on the BCT 'instructions on how to perform a behavior' rather than diverse BCTs. No interventions significantly increased adherence to all PAD therapies. Few studies measured the intervention's impact on adherence, making it difficult to determine effective intervention characteristics. Most interventions lacked behavioral science approaches and were not designed to address specific adherence determinants. Future interventions should incorporate these elements to effectively address patients' needs. <b>Open Science Framework Registry ID: osf.io/7xqzj</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"343-352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171072/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143624647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-14DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251322177
Kasthuri Nair, Brandi M Mize, Mia S White, Tabia Henry Akintobi, Rachel E Patzer, Shipra Arya, Olamide Alabi
{"title":"Reporting of race, ethnicity, and gender in lower-extremity peripheral artery disease randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Kasthuri Nair, Brandi M Mize, Mia S White, Tabia Henry Akintobi, Rachel E Patzer, Shipra Arya, Olamide Alabi","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251322177","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251322177","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"315-317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144039040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-03DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251322182
Georgia R Parsons, Gomathy Parvathinathan, Ali Etemadi, Sai Liu, Elsie Ross, W Schuyler Jones, Margaret R Stedman, Tara I Chang
{"title":"Identifying peripheral artery disease in persons with and without chronic kidney disease from electronic health records.","authors":"Georgia R Parsons, Gomathy Parvathinathan, Ali Etemadi, Sai Liu, Elsie Ross, W Schuyler Jones, Margaret R Stedman, Tara I Chang","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251322182","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251322182","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"312-314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-09DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251320917
Natalie S Evans, Alexandra L Solomon, Elizabeth V Ratchford
{"title":"Vascular Disease Patient Information Page: Peripheral artery disease - 2025 update.","authors":"Natalie S Evans, Alexandra L Solomon, Elizabeth V Ratchford","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251320917","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251320917","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"384-388"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144047444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251340018
J Blake Iceton, Stanislav Henkin, Daniella Kadian-Dodov, Danielle Vlazny
{"title":"A day in the life of a vascular medicine specialist and highlights from the 2025 SVM Fellows and APP course.","authors":"J Blake Iceton, Stanislav Henkin, Daniella Kadian-Dodov, Danielle Vlazny","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251340018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251340018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"395-399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144302963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251332960
Geoffrey D Barnes
{"title":"Implementation science in vascular medicine: Translating research findings into everyday practice.","authors":"Geoffrey D Barnes","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251332960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251332960","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"278-280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144302965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251339143
Fanny Stampfli Silva, Natalie S Evans, Alexandra L Solomon, Elizabeth V Ratchford
{"title":"Información para Pacientes con Enfermedades Vasculares: Enfermedad arterial periférica - actualización del 2025.","authors":"Fanny Stampfli Silva, Natalie S Evans, Alexandra L Solomon, Elizabeth V Ratchford","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251339143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251339143","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"389-394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144302966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251341799
Shea E Hogan, Cullen E Buchanan, R Wilson King, Mark R Nehler, Judith Hsia
{"title":"Exercise therapy for symptomatic peripheral artery disease following lower-extremity revascularization in two large healthcare systems.","authors":"Shea E Hogan, Cullen E Buchanan, R Wilson King, Mark R Nehler, Judith Hsia","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251341799","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251341799","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"324-325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144302964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-02-24DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251320347
Santiago Callegari, Gaëlle Romain, Isabella Capuano, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado
Introduction: Reintervention following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is recommended post-PVI, yet its association with reintervention outcomes remains unclear.
Methods: We analyzed Vascular Quality Initiative registry data linked with Medicare outcome for patients undergoing PVI for PAD (2017-2018). GDMT was defined as the receipt of statin, antiplatelet, and angiotensin-converting enzyme or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE/ARB) therapy if hypertensive at discharge. Competing risk analyses and conditional risk models assessed the reintervention outcome, and the recurrent reintervention outcomes within 2 years, by GDMT receipt, compliance with each GDMT element, the number of elements received, and GDMT rate across sites and operators in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort.
Results: We included 13,244 patients (mean age 72.0 ± 9.9, women 41.0%). The reintervention outcome did not differ by GDMT receipt (cumulative incidence: 43.0% [95% CI 41.0-44.9%] in no GDMT vs 41.2% [95% CI 39.4- 43.0%] in GDMT; subhazard ratio (sHR): 1.03 [95% CI 0.97-1.10]), compliance with GDMT elements, the number of elements received, or site and operator GDMT rates (sHR per 10% increase: 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.03] and 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.02]) (all p > 0.05). However, a higher operator GDMT rate reduced the recurrent reintervention risk (HR: 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], p = 0.026).
Conclusion: Around 40% of patients undergoing a PVI experience reintervention within 2 years, but the outcome was not reduced with GDMT receipt, and higher GDMT rates by site and operators were not associated with reintervention risk. Future studies should focus on medication adherence, refills, and more granular GDMT data for PAD care surveillance postrevascularization.
外周动脉疾病(PAD)外周血管介入治疗(PVI)后再介入治疗是很常见的。指南导向的药物治疗(GDMT)被推荐在pvi后,但其与再干预结果的关系尚不清楚。方法:我们分析了血管质量倡议注册数据与2017-2018年PAD患者接受PVI的医疗保险结果相关。GDMT定义为出院时高血压患者接受他汀类药物、抗血小板药物和血管紧张素转换酶或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACE/ARB)治疗。在1:1的倾向评分匹配队列中,竞争风险分析和条件风险模型通过GDMT接收、每个GDMT要素的依从性、接收要素的数量以及不同地点和操作人员的GDMT率来评估再干预结果和2年内的反复再干预结果。结果:纳入13244例患者(平均年龄72.0±9.9岁,女性41.0%)。再干预结果没有因GDMT的接受而不同(累计发生率:未GDMT组43.0% [95% CI 41.0-44.9%] vs GDMT组41.2% [95% CI 39.4- 43.0%];亚危险比(sHR): 1.03 [95% CI 0.97-1.10]),对GDMT要素的依从性,接受的要素数量,或现场和操作员GDMT率(每增加10%的sHR: 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.03]和1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.02])(均p < 0.05)。然而,较高的操作人员GDMT率降低了复发再干预风险(HR: 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], p = 0.026)。结论:大约40%的PVI患者在2年内经历了再干预,但结果并没有随着GDMT的接受而降低,并且部位和操作人员的GDMT率较高与再干预风险无关。未来的研究应侧重于药物依从性、再填充和更细粒度的GDMT数据,用于血管化后PAD护理监测。
{"title":"Association between guideline-directed medical therapy and reintervention risk following peripheral vascular interventions in patients with peripheral artery disease.","authors":"Santiago Callegari, Gaëlle Romain, Isabella Capuano, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251320347","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251320347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reintervention following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is recommended post-PVI, yet its association with reintervention outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed Vascular Quality Initiative registry data linked with Medicare outcome for patients undergoing PVI for PAD (2017-2018). GDMT was defined as the receipt of statin, antiplatelet, and angiotensin-converting enzyme or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE/ARB) therapy if hypertensive at discharge. Competing risk analyses and conditional risk models assessed the reintervention outcome, and the recurrent reintervention outcomes within 2 years, by GDMT receipt, compliance with each GDMT element, the number of elements received, and GDMT rate across sites and operators in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13,244 patients (mean age 72.0 ± 9.9, women 41.0%). The reintervention outcome did not differ by GDMT receipt (cumulative incidence: 43.0% [95% CI 41.0-44.9%] in no GDMT vs 41.2% [95% CI 39.4- 43.0%] in GDMT; subhazard ratio (sHR): 1.03 [95% CI 0.97-1.10]), compliance with GDMT elements, the number of elements received, or site and operator GDMT rates (sHR per 10% increase: 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.03] and 1.00 [95% CI 0.98-1.02]) (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). However, a higher operator GDMT rate reduced the recurrent reintervention risk (HR: 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.00], <i>p</i> = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Around 40% of patients undergoing a PVI experience reintervention within 2 years, but the outcome was not reduced with GDMT receipt, and higher GDMT rates by site and operators were not associated with reintervention risk. Future studies should focus on medication adherence, refills, and more granular GDMT data for PAD care surveillance postrevascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"293-301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143483781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-09DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251328671
Abena Appah-Sampong, Ascharya Balaji, Jack H Casey, Navya Kotturu, Danielle Montano, Mohit Manchella, Bassil Bacare, James J Fitzgibbon, Patrick Heindel, Tanujit Dey, Behnood Bikdeli, Mohamad A Hussain
Billing data including International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are increasingly used to identify cohorts of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) in electronic health records (EHRs) and administrative claims databases (ACDs). However, the validity of common PAD phenotyping approaches is a central challenge to the utilization of EHR and ACD data. We present a scoping review of contemporary PAD observational studies to describe the electronic phenotyping strategies employed in PAD identification and propose recommendations for improvement. We searched two databases, MEDLINE and Web of Science, identifying a total of 748 articles that underwent title and abstract review. Of these articles, 163 met the criteria for full-text review, with 84 articles ultimately included in the study. We demonstrate that 19.0% of eligible studies utilized ICD, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, 11.9% utilized ICD, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes, and 69.0% of studies utilized a combination of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes in their electronic phenotyping methodology. Of the included studies, 76.2% utilized a single-code query approach for electronic phenotyping despite low diagnostic yield, and 21.4% utilized rule-based methods. Only five studies utilized logistic regression modeling, despite the demonstrated effectiveness of this method. The current study demonstrates high utilization of unreliable electronic phenotyping methods such as single-code-based queries, which severely limits research quality. Improvements in electronic phenotyping methods are necessary to leverage data from EHRs and ACDs for high-quality research.
包括国际疾病分类(ICD)代码在内的账单数据越来越多地用于识别电子健康记录(EHRs)和行政索赔数据库(ACDs)中的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者队列。然而,常见的PAD表型方法的有效性是EHR和ACD数据利用的核心挑战。我们对当代PAD观察性研究进行了综述,描述了PAD识别中采用的电子表型策略,并提出了改进建议。我们检索了MEDLINE和Web of Science两个数据库,确定了总共748篇进行了标题和摘要审查的文章。在这些文章中,163篇符合全文审查的标准,其中84篇最终被纳入研究。我们证明,19.0%的符合条件的研究使用了ICD,第九版(ICD-9)代码,11.9%使用了ICD,第十版(ICD-10)代码,69.0%的研究在其电子表型方法中使用了ICD-9和ICD-10代码的组合。在纳入的研究中,尽管诊断率较低,但76.2%的研究采用了单码查询方法进行电子表型分析,21.4%的研究采用了基于规则的方法。尽管这种方法证明了有效性,但只有五项研究使用了逻辑回归模型。目前的研究表明,大量使用不可靠的电子表型方法,如基于单代码的查询,这严重限制了研究质量。为了利用电子病历和ACDs的数据进行高质量的研究,有必要改进电子表型方法。
{"title":"A scoping review of electronic phenotyping methodologies used to identify peripheral artery disease in observational studies.","authors":"Abena Appah-Sampong, Ascharya Balaji, Jack H Casey, Navya Kotturu, Danielle Montano, Mohit Manchella, Bassil Bacare, James J Fitzgibbon, Patrick Heindel, Tanujit Dey, Behnood Bikdeli, Mohamad A Hussain","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251328671","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251328671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Billing data including International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are increasingly used to identify cohorts of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) in electronic health records (EHRs) and administrative claims databases (ACDs). However, the validity of common PAD phenotyping approaches is a central challenge to the utilization of EHR and ACD data. We present a scoping review of contemporary PAD observational studies to describe the electronic phenotyping strategies employed in PAD identification and propose recommendations for improvement. We searched two databases, MEDLINE and Web of Science, identifying a total of 748 articles that underwent title and abstract review. Of these articles, 163 met the criteria for full-text review, with 84 articles ultimately included in the study. We demonstrate that 19.0% of eligible studies utilized ICD, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, 11.9% utilized ICD, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes, and 69.0% of studies utilized a combination of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes in their electronic phenotyping methodology. Of the included studies, 76.2% utilized a single-code query approach for electronic phenotyping despite low diagnostic yield, and 21.4% utilized rule-based methods. Only five studies utilized logistic regression modeling, despite the demonstrated effectiveness of this method. The current study demonstrates high utilization of unreliable electronic phenotyping methods such as single-code-based queries, which severely limits research quality. Improvements in electronic phenotyping methods are necessary to leverage data from EHRs and ACDs for high-quality research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"330-342"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143988548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}