Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251396541
Maria Teresa B Abola
{"title":"From the Masters: Pioneering pulse-The story of vascular medicine in the Philippines.","authors":"Maria Teresa B Abola","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251396541","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251396541","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251394284
Melanie Haverkamp, Pim A de Jong, Frank Lj Visseren, Wilko Spiering
Background: Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) is a rare disease caused by pathogenic ABCC6 variants, leading to arterial calcifications and increased cardiovascular risk. Validated intermediate endpoints are needed to evaluate cardiovascular risk-reducing therapies in PXE. This prospective cohort study investigates the relationship between arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events in patients with PXE. Methods: This prospective cohort study obtained patients from the Dutch University Medical Center Utrecht Expertise Center for PXE. Arterial stiffness was measured with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and the augmentation index (AIx). Cardiovascular endpoints were cardiovascular death, cerebrovascular and coronary events, and peripheral artery interventions. Cox proportional hazard models analyzed associations between arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events, adjusting for confounders. Results: Among 390 patients (mean age 51 ± 15 years, 60% women), 45 cardiovascular events occurred during a median follow up of 6.1 years (IQR 3.2; 9.2). A 1-m/s higher cfPWV was related to an increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.28; 95% CI 1.06-1.53). The effect of cfPWV depends on age (p-value = 0.03), with a lower cardiovascular risk HR at older age (HR age at 40 years: 1.51; 95% CI 1.11-1.97 to HR age at 60 years: 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.26). A 10% higher AIx at baseline was related to future cardiovascular events (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.10-1.95). No significant interaction between the AIx and age was found. Conclusion: This prospective cohort study shows that arterial stiffness, measured by cfPWV and AIx, is independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk in PXE. Measures of arterial stiffness could be explored as intermediate endpoints in trials evaluating cardiovascular risk-reducing therapies in PXE.
背景:弹性假性黄瘤(PXE)是一种由致病性ABCC6变异引起的罕见疾病,可导致动脉钙化和心血管风险增加。需要经过验证的中间终点来评估PXE患者的心血管风险降低治疗。这项前瞻性队列研究调查了PXE患者动脉僵硬度与心血管事件之间的关系。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究获得了来自荷兰大学医学中心乌得勒支专家中心的PXE患者。用颈-股脉波速度(cfPWV)和增强指数(AIx)测量动脉僵硬度。心血管终点为心血管死亡、脑血管和冠状动脉事件以及外周动脉干预。Cox比例风险模型分析了动脉硬度和心血管事件之间的关系,调整了混杂因素。结果:390例患者(平均年龄51±15岁,60%为女性)中位随访6.1年(IQR 3.2; 9.2),发生45例心血管事件。cfPWV升高1 m/s与心血管事件风险增加相关(危险比[HR]: 1.28; 95% CI 1.06-1.53)。cfPWV的影响取决于年龄(p值= 0.03),年龄越大心血管风险HR越低(40岁时的HR: 1.51; 95% CI 1.11-1.97; 60岁时的HR: 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.26)。基线时AIx升高10%与未来心血管事件相关(HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.10-1.95)。在AIx和年龄之间没有发现明显的相互作用。结论:这项前瞻性队列研究表明,cfPWV和AIx测量的动脉硬度与PXE患者心血管风险增加独立相关。在评估PXE患者心血管风险降低治疗的试验中,动脉僵硬度的测量可以作为中间终点。
{"title":"Arterial stiffness is related to a higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients with pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE).","authors":"Melanie Haverkamp, Pim A de Jong, Frank Lj Visseren, Wilko Spiering","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251394284","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251394284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) is a rare disease caused by pathogenic <i>ABCC6</i> variants, leading to arterial calcifications and increased cardiovascular risk. Validated intermediate endpoints are needed to evaluate cardiovascular risk-reducing therapies in PXE. This prospective cohort study investigates the relationship between arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events in patients with PXE. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective cohort study obtained patients from the Dutch University Medical Center Utrecht Expertise Center for PXE. Arterial stiffness was measured with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and the augmentation index (AIx). Cardiovascular endpoints were cardiovascular death, cerebrovascular and coronary events, and peripheral artery interventions. Cox proportional hazard models analyzed associations between arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events, adjusting for confounders. <b>Results:</b> Among 390 patients (mean age 51 ± 15 years, 60% women), 45 cardiovascular events occurred during a median follow up of 6.1 years (IQR 3.2; 9.2). A 1-m/s higher cfPWV was related to an increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.28; 95% CI 1.06-1.53). The effect of cfPWV depends on age (<i>p</i>-value = 0.03), with a lower cardiovascular risk HR at older age (HR age at 40 years: 1.51; 95% CI 1.11-1.97 to HR age at 60 years: 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.26). A 10% higher AIx at baseline was related to future cardiovascular events (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.10-1.95). No significant interaction between the AIx and age was found. <b>Conclusion:</b> This prospective cohort study shows that arterial stiffness, measured by cfPWV and AIx, is independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk in PXE. Measures of arterial stiffness could be explored as intermediate endpoints in trials evaluating cardiovascular risk-reducing therapies in PXE.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"19-27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12901643/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251386394
Alfredo Verastegui, Regina Castaneda, Oliver Antonio Gómez-Gutiérrez, Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo, Oscar de la Torre, Diego Herrera Vegas, August Ysa, Manuel García-Toca, Mario Alejandro Fabiani
Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a global health challenge. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), such as large language models (LLMs) and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, offer novel approaches for clinical recommendations. This study compared the readability and guideline adherence of responses from physicians and AI for a standardized PAD case.
Methods: This cross-sectional study gathered responses from 30 specialized physicians (11 cardiologists, 19 vascular surgeons) across seven Latin American countries and 13 LLM systems (10 standard, three CoT). Both groups addressed diagnosis, treatment, risks, and prognosis; LLMs responded as vascular specialists. Responses were blindly evaluated with five validated Spanish readability indices and compared to the 2024 ACC/AHA multisocietal PAD guideline. Three experts scored guideline adherence; nonparametric tests were applied.
Results: Guideline adherence did not differ significantly between physicians (median 5.8 [3.4-7.6]) and LLMs (7.3 [4.7-9.7], p = 0.169), though CoT-LLMs achieved the highest scores (9.7 [8.5-11.0]). LLMs more often recommended supervised exercise (84.6% vs 30.0%, p = 0.002) and revascularization for quality of life (69.2% vs 20.0%, p = 0.004), whereas physicians favored cilostazol (60.0% vs 30.8%, p = 0.104). LLM responses had lower Readability μ values (46.9 vs 51.4, p = 0.012). Inter-rater reliability was highest for CoT-LLMs (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.98) versus physicians (ICC = 0.76).
Conclusion: LLM showed comparable guideline adherence to physicians although CoT models achieved the highest scores. The difference in physician and AI treatment preferences suggest the potential of AI as adjunct clinical tools and warrants further study.
背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)是一个全球性的健康挑战。人工智能(AI)的进步,如大型语言模型(LLMs)和思维链(CoT)推理,为临床推荐提供了新的方法。本研究比较了医生和人工智能对一个标准化PAD病例反应的可读性和指南依从性。方法:这项横断面研究收集了来自7个拉丁美洲国家和13个LLM系统(10个标准,3个CoT)的30名专科医生(11名心脏病专家,19名血管外科医生)的反馈。两组都讨论了诊断、治疗、风险和预后;法学硕士的反应是血管专家。采用五种经过验证的西班牙语可读性指数进行盲评价,并与2024 ACC/AHA多社会PAD指南进行比较。3位专家对指南依从性进行评分;采用非参数检验。结果:医生(中位数5.8[3.4-7.6])和LLMs(中位数7.3 [4.7-9.7],p = 0.169)之间的指南依从性无显著差异,尽管CoT-LLMs得分最高(9.7[8.5-11.0])。llm更倾向于推荐有监督的运动(84.6% vs 30.0%, p = 0.002)和血运重建术(69.2% vs 20.0%, p = 0.004),而医生更倾向于西洛他唑(60.0% vs 30.8%, p = 0.104)。LLM反应的Readability μ值较低(46.9 vs 51.4, p = 0.012)。量表间信度最高的是CoT-LLMs(类内相关系数[ICC] = 0.98)和内科医生(ICC = 0.76)。结论:尽管CoT模型获得了最高的分数,但LLM与医生的指南依从性相当。医生和人工智能治疗偏好的差异表明,人工智能作为辅助临床工具的潜力值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Comparing guideline adherence and readability: Artificial intelligence with deep learning versus specialized physicians in peripheral artery disease management.","authors":"Alfredo Verastegui, Regina Castaneda, Oliver Antonio Gómez-Gutiérrez, Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo, Oscar de la Torre, Diego Herrera Vegas, August Ysa, Manuel García-Toca, Mario Alejandro Fabiani","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251386394","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251386394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a global health challenge. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), such as large language models (LLMs) and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, offer novel approaches for clinical recommendations. This study compared the readability and guideline adherence of responses from physicians and AI for a standardized PAD case.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study gathered responses from 30 specialized physicians (11 cardiologists, 19 vascular surgeons) across seven Latin American countries and 13 LLM systems (10 standard, three CoT). Both groups addressed diagnosis, treatment, risks, and prognosis; LLMs responded as vascular specialists. Responses were blindly evaluated with five validated Spanish readability indices and compared to the 2024 ACC/AHA multisocietal PAD guideline. Three experts scored guideline adherence; nonparametric tests were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Guideline adherence did not differ significantly between physicians (median 5.8 [3.4-7.6]) and LLMs (7.3 [4.7-9.7], <i>p</i> = 0.169), though CoT-LLMs achieved the highest scores (9.7 [8.5-11.0]). LLMs more often recommended supervised exercise (84.6% vs 30.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and revascularization for quality of life (69.2% vs 20.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.004), whereas physicians favored cilostazol (60.0% vs 30.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.104). LLM responses had lower Readability μ values (46.9 vs 51.4, <i>p</i> = 0.012). Inter-rater reliability was highest for CoT-LLMs (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.98) versus physicians (ICC = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLM showed comparable guideline adherence to physicians although CoT models achieved the highest scores. The difference in physician and AI treatment preferences suggest the potential of AI as adjunct clinical tools and warrants further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"70-78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251389874
Caroline H Kim, Klaus D Hagspiel
{"title":"Images in Vascular Medicine: Middle mesenteric artery.","authors":"Caroline H Kim, Klaus D Hagspiel","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251389874","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251389874","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"124-125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251407653
Sivan Naveh, Alexandra L Solomon, R Kevin Rogers, Margaret Boyle
{"title":"Vascular Disease Patient Information Page: Schamberg disease (progressive pigmentary dermatosis).","authors":"Sivan Naveh, Alexandra L Solomon, R Kevin Rogers, Margaret Boyle","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251407653","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251407653","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"131-133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251389534
Jiaqi Li, Yuanyuan Liu, Xi Yang, Guangsen Li
{"title":"Images in Vascular Medicine: Intravenous pyogenic granuloma in the great saphenous vein.","authors":"Jiaqi Li, Yuanyuan Liu, Xi Yang, Guangsen Li","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251389534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251389534","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251389534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251394407
Volkan Burak Taban, Zeycan Hacıoğlu, Uğur Yanç, Abdullah Güner, Yüksel Dereli
{"title":"Images in Vascular Medicine: Great saphenous vein aneurysm following radiofrequency ablation.","authors":"Volkan Burak Taban, Zeycan Hacıoğlu, Uğur Yanç, Abdullah Güner, Yüksel Dereli","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251394407","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251394407","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251394407"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-21DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251336736
Beth L Cheshire, Sarah J Messeder, Coral J Pepper, Lucy C Beishon, Rob D Sayers, John Sm Houghton
This systematic review aimed to describe the association between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and cognitive impairment or dementia. We included studies reporting on the association between PAD (defined by ankle-brachial index ⩽ 0.9) and cognitive function in adult populations. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to January 2025. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Exposure effects (ROBINS-E) tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken structured by cognitive outcome and study design. Thirty-eight studies were included in the review (58,586 participants). The results provide evidence that PAD is associated with cognitive impairment. Seventeen (81%) cross-sectional studies and four (67%) longitudinal studies reported associations of PAD with poorer cognitive performance or increased risk of cognitive impairment. Impaired memory and processing speed were most frequently associated with PAD. PAD was also associated with increased dementia risk in cross-sectional (odds ratios = 1.50-2.41) and longitudinal studies (hazard ratios = 1.03-2.40), although proportionally fewer longitudinal studies reported significant association of PAD with dementia. Results suggest increased prevalence of cognitive impairment, independent of cardiovascular risk factors and cerebrovascular disease. Awareness of the prevalence of cognitive impairment and its potential impact on treatment adherence and engagement in a healthy lifestyle is important for clinicians treating patients with PAD. Screening for cognitive impairment in those with PAD may aid early diagnosis and management of cognitive impairment in this high-risk population. Further research is required to determine whether screening for and optimal management of PAD has cognitive benefits. (PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023399608).
{"title":"Association of cognitive impairment and peripheral artery disease (PAD): A systematic review.","authors":"Beth L Cheshire, Sarah J Messeder, Coral J Pepper, Lucy C Beishon, Rob D Sayers, John Sm Houghton","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251336736","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251336736","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to describe the association between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and cognitive impairment or dementia. We included studies reporting on the association between PAD (defined by ankle-brachial index ⩽ 0.9) and cognitive function in adult populations. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to January 2025. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Exposure effects (ROBINS-E) tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken structured by cognitive outcome and study design. Thirty-eight studies were included in the review (58,586 participants). The results provide evidence that PAD is associated with cognitive impairment. Seventeen (81%) cross-sectional studies and four (67%) longitudinal studies reported associations of PAD with poorer cognitive performance or increased risk of cognitive impairment. Impaired memory and processing speed were most frequently associated with PAD. PAD was also associated with increased dementia risk in cross-sectional (odds ratios = 1.50-2.41) and longitudinal studies (hazard ratios = 1.03-2.40), although proportionally fewer longitudinal studies reported significant association of PAD with dementia. Results suggest increased prevalence of cognitive impairment, independent of cardiovascular risk factors and cerebrovascular disease. Awareness of the prevalence of cognitive impairment and its potential impact on treatment adherence and engagement in a healthy lifestyle is important for clinicians treating patients with PAD. Screening for cognitive impairment in those with PAD may aid early diagnosis and management of cognitive impairment in this high-risk population. Further research is required to determine whether screening for and optimal management of PAD has cognitive benefits. <b>(PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023399608)</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"724-739"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12664932/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144112086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (Exercise-TcPO2) that has been validated with a constant-load treadmill protocol, is useful to assess patients with suspected lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). To date, nothing is known about its use with a graded protocol. The aim of this study is to compare the Exercise-TcPO2 results obtained in patients with suspected PAD using a graded Gardner-Skinner (3.2 km/h, 2% grade increase every 2 min) versus a constant modified Strandness (3.2 km/h, 10% grade) treadmill test.
Methods: Patients with suspected PAD were assessed twice on the same day on a treadmill using the modified Strandness (Strand) followed by the Gardner-Skinner (Gard) tests. In both tests, the decrease from resting oxygen pressure (DROP) indexes were measured at the buttock and calf levels as previously validated. A DROPStrand index ⩽ -15 mmHg was considered positive for the diagnosis of PAD. The relationship between DROPGard and DROPStrand as well as DROP value differences between the two tests and concordances were studied.
Results: This prospective study included 40 patients. Using a linear mixed model, the relationship between DROPGard and DROPStrand was defined as DROPGard = 0.647 × DROPStrand - 1.858. The mean difference between DROPGard and DROPStrand was -4.3 ± 7.3 mmHg. Positive and negative agreements were 78.0% and 86.3%, respectively. The kappa coefficient between DROPGard and DROPStrand was 0.65 [0.54; 0.77].
Conclusion: Exercise-TcPO2 results using the Gardner-Skinner and modified Strandness treadmill tests were highly correlated. This study suggests the use of a DROPGard value ⩽ -12 mmHg to diagnose PAD when performing Exercise-TcPO2 with a Gardner-Skinner test. However, this cut-off value should be confirmed against an imaging gold standard. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03186391.
{"title":"Relationship between exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurements with constant and graded treadmill tests.","authors":"Cindy Vannier, Adélaïde Guézais, Marjolaine Talbot, Alexis Le Faucheur, Guillaume Mahé","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251379810","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251379810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (Exercise-TcPO<sub>2</sub>) that has been validated with a constant-load treadmill protocol, is useful to assess patients with suspected lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). To date, nothing is known about its use with a graded protocol. The aim of this study is to compare the Exercise-TcPO<sub>2</sub> results obtained in patients with suspected PAD using a graded Gardner-Skinner (3.2 km/h, 2% grade increase every 2 min) versus a constant modified Strandness (3.2 km/h, 10% grade) treadmill test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with suspected PAD were assessed twice on the same day on a treadmill using the modified Strandness (Strand) followed by the Gardner-Skinner (Gard) tests. In both tests, the decrease from resting oxygen pressure (DROP) indexes were measured at the buttock and calf levels as previously validated. A DROP<sub>Strand</sub> index ⩽ -15 mmHg was considered positive for the diagnosis of PAD. The relationship between DROP<sub>Gard</sub> and DROP<sub>Strand</sub> as well as DROP value differences between the two tests and concordances were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This prospective study included 40 patients. Using a linear mixed model, the relationship between DROP<sub>Gard</sub> and DROP<sub>Strand</sub> was defined as DROP<sub>Gard</sub> = 0.647 × DROP<sub>Strand</sub> - 1.858. The mean difference between DROP<sub>Gard</sub> and DROP<sub>Strand</sub> was -4.3 ± 7.3 mmHg. Positive and negative agreements were 78.0% and 86.3%, respectively. The kappa coefficient between DROP<sub>Gard</sub> and DROP<sub>Strand</sub> was 0.65 [0.54; 0.77].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise-TcPO<sub>2</sub> results using the Gardner-Skinner and modified Strandness treadmill tests were highly correlated. This study suggests the use of a DROP<sub>Gard</sub> value ⩽ -12 mmHg to diagnose PAD when performing Exercise-TcPO<sub>2</sub> with a Gardner-Skinner test. However, this cut-off value should be confirmed against an imaging gold standard. <b>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03186391</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"676-682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}