Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251393107
Ashkan Yahyavi, Maedeh Zokaei Nikoo, Leen Hussein, Aarti Katara, Jaime A Perez, Mehdi H Shishehbor
Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but their effect on the risk of cardiovascular events and amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) remains underexplored. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between GLP-1RA use and the 5-year risk of major amputation, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with CLTI.
Methods: The TriNetX real-world clinical data platform was used to identify patients with T2DM and CLTI, categorized by GLP-1RA prescription records. Propensity score matching was applied based on demographics, comorbidities, concurrent medications, and laboratory values. Cox proportional hazards, Kaplan-Meier curves, and the log-rank test were used for analysis.
Results: Among 139,173 patients with T2DM and CLTI, 17,306 patients were GLP-1RA users and 121,867 were non-GLP-1RA users. Following propensity score matching, 15,743 patients remained in each group (91% match rate). The mean age was 65.4 ± 11 years and 58.9% were men. The mean follow-up duration was 753.7 days. GLP-1RA users had a significantly lower rate of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.745; 95% CI: 0.679-0.816; log-rank p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.663-0.738; log-rank p < 0.001), and myocardial infarction (MI) (HR: 0.838; 95% CI: 0.792-0.886; log-rank p < 0.001). There was no difference in the risk of ischemic stroke (HR: 0.969; 95% CI: 0.906-1.036; log-rank p = 0.353).
Conclusion: The use of GLP-1RA medications is associated with a significant decrease in the 5-year risk of major amputations, all-cause mortality, and MI in diabetic patients with CLTI.
背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)已证实对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的心血管有益,但其对慢性肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)患者心血管事件和截肢风险的影响仍未得到充分研究。这项回顾性队列研究评估了GLP-1RA的使用与糖尿病合并CLTI患者5年主要截肢风险、全因死亡率和心血管事件之间的关系。方法:采用TriNetX真实世界临床数据平台对T2DM和CLTI患者进行识别,根据GLP-1RA处方记录进行分类。根据人口统计学、合并症、并发用药和实验室值应用倾向评分匹配。采用Cox比例风险、Kaplan-Meier曲线和log-rank检验进行分析。结果:在139173例T2DM和CLTI患者中,17306例患者使用GLP-1RA, 121867例患者不使用GLP-1RA。在倾向评分匹配后,每组保留15,743例患者(91%的匹配率)。平均年龄65.4±11岁,男性占58.9%。平均随访时间753.7天。GLP-1RA使用者的主要截肢率(危险比[HR]: 0.745; 95% CI: 0.679-0.816; log-rank p < 0.001)、全因死亡率(HR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.663-0.738; log-rank p < 0.001)和心肌梗死(MI) (HR: 0.838; 95% CI: 0.792-0.886; log-rank p < 0.001)显著降低。两组缺血性卒中风险无差异(HR: 0.969; 95% CI: 0.906-1.036; log-rank p = 0.353)。结论:GLP-1RA药物的使用与糖尿病合并CLTI患者5年主要截肢、全因死亡率和心肌梗死风险的显著降低有关。
{"title":"Benefits of Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists on 5-year risk of major amputation, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).","authors":"Ashkan Yahyavi, Maedeh Zokaei Nikoo, Leen Hussein, Aarti Katara, Jaime A Perez, Mehdi H Shishehbor","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251393107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251393107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but their effect on the risk of cardiovascular events and amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) remains underexplored. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between GLP-1RA use and the 5-year risk of major amputation, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with CLTI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TriNetX real-world clinical data platform was used to identify patients with T2DM and CLTI, categorized by GLP-1RA prescription records. Propensity score matching was applied based on demographics, comorbidities, concurrent medications, and laboratory values. Cox proportional hazards, Kaplan-Meier curves, and the log-rank test were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 139,173 patients with T2DM and CLTI, 17,306 patients were GLP-1RA users and 121,867 were non-GLP-1RA users. Following propensity score matching, 15,743 patients remained in each group (91% match rate). The mean age was 65.4 ± 11 years and 58.9% were men. The mean follow-up duration was 753.7 days. GLP-1RA users had a significantly lower rate of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.745; 95% CI: 0.679-0.816; log-rank <i>p</i> < 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.663-0.738; log-rank <i>p</i> < 0.001), and myocardial infarction (MI) (HR: 0.838; 95% CI: 0.792-0.886; log-rank <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in the risk of ischemic stroke (HR: 0.969; 95% CI: 0.906-1.036; log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.353).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of GLP-1RA medications is associated with a significant decrease in the 5-year risk of major amputations, all-cause mortality, and MI in diabetic patients with CLTI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251393107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251399581
Akiva Rosenzveig, Leben Tefera
{"title":"AI as a tool, not a replacement, in vascular medicine.","authors":"Akiva Rosenzveig, Leben Tefera","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251399581","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251399581","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251399581"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251392496
Yanqing Zhao, Amber Liles, Andrea Tara Obi, Oscar Moreno, David Gordon, William M Sherk, David M Williams, Minhaj S Khaja
Background: In-stent occlusion (ISO) remains a significant challenge in postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), with limited histopathologic characterization.
Methods: Between January 2022 and November 2024, 19 patients with PTS (12 men; mean age 44.3 ± 12.4 years) presenting with 20 iliofemoral venous ISO underwent thrombectomy using the RevCore system. Histopathology was performed on retrieved materials from 16 limbs. Technical success, stent patency, and Villalta score were assessed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression identified predictors of restenosis/occlusion.
Results: Technical success was 95% (19/20 limbs). In venous stent occlusions < 3 months duration (n = 12), retrieved materials contained more fresh thrombus (40.4%, p = 0.058) and old thrombus (41.3%, p = 0.040) than in occlusions ⩾ 3 months duration (n = 4), where diffuse intimal thickening (DIT) was predominant (73.8%, p = 0.008). Severe restenosis/occlusion occurred in 60% (12/20) of limbs during a median 209.5-day follow up, with median patency of 144.5 days. Villalta scores improved from 14.8 ± 7.1 to 9.4 ± 6.8 at 1 month (p = 0.002) and 9.5 ± 6.8 at the final follow up (p = 0.001). Retrieved materials containing > 50% old thrombus had a higher restenosis/occlusion risk (p = 0.026). Common iliac vein (CIV) residual stenosis ⩾ 30% (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.103; p = 0.037) and a restored common femoral vein (CFV) flow diameter < 8.0 mm (HR = 3.871; p = 0.026) predicted severe restenosis/occlusion.
Conclusion: In PTS-related ISO, DIT predominated in occlusion ⩾ 3 months. Old thrombus, CIV residual stenosis ⩾ 30%, and a CFV flow diameter < 8.0 mm predicted restenosis/occlusion. Integrating histopathologic assessment into postthrombectomy evaluation may help tailor and optimize management strategies for iliofemoral ISO.
{"title":"Histopathology of iliofemoral vein in-stent occlusion in postthrombotic syndrome: Findings from endovascular thrombectomy.","authors":"Yanqing Zhao, Amber Liles, Andrea Tara Obi, Oscar Moreno, David Gordon, William M Sherk, David M Williams, Minhaj S Khaja","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251392496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251392496","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-stent occlusion (ISO) remains a significant challenge in postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), with limited histopathologic characterization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2022 and November 2024, 19 patients with PTS (12 men; mean age 44.3 ± 12.4 years) presenting with 20 iliofemoral venous ISO underwent thrombectomy using the RevCore system. Histopathology was performed on retrieved materials from 16 limbs. Technical success, stent patency, and Villalta score were assessed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression identified predictors of restenosis/occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success was 95% (19/20 limbs). In venous stent occlusions < 3 months duration (<i>n</i> = 12), retrieved materials contained more fresh thrombus (40.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.058) and old thrombus (41.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.040) than in occlusions ⩾ 3 months duration (<i>n</i> = 4), where diffuse intimal thickening (DIT) was predominant (73.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.008). Severe restenosis/occlusion occurred in 60% (12/20) of limbs during a median 209.5-day follow up, with median patency of 144.5 days. Villalta scores improved from 14.8 ± 7.1 to 9.4 ± 6.8 at 1 month (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and 9.5 ± 6.8 at the final follow up (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Retrieved materials containing > 50% old thrombus had a higher restenosis/occlusion risk (<i>p</i> = 0.026). Common iliac vein (CIV) residual stenosis ⩾ 30% (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.103; <i>p</i> = 0.037) and a restored common femoral vein (CFV) flow diameter < 8.0 mm (HR = 3.871; <i>p</i> = 0.026) predicted severe restenosis/occlusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In PTS-related ISO, DIT predominated in occlusion ⩾ 3 months. Old thrombus, CIV residual stenosis ⩾ 30%, and a CFV flow diameter < 8.0 mm predicted restenosis/occlusion. Integrating histopathologic assessment into postthrombectomy evaluation may help tailor and optimize management strategies for iliofemoral ISO.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251392496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145774261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251386394
Alfredo Verastegui, Regina Castaneda, Oliver Antonio Gómez-Gutiérrez, Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo, Oscar de la Torre, Diego Herrera Vegas, August Ysa, Manuel García-Toca, Mario Alejandro Fabiani
Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a global health challenge. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), such as large language models (LLMs) and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, offer novel approaches for clinical recommendations. This study compared the readability and guideline adherence of responses from physicians and AI for a standardized PAD case.
Methods: This cross-sectional study gathered responses from 30 specialized physicians (11 cardiologists, 19 vascular surgeons) across seven Latin American countries and 13 LLM systems (10 standard, three CoT). Both groups addressed diagnosis, treatment, risks, and prognosis; LLMs responded as vascular specialists. Responses were blindly evaluated with five validated Spanish readability indices and compared to the 2024 ACC/AHA multisocietal PAD guideline. Three experts scored guideline adherence; nonparametric tests were applied.
Results: Guideline adherence did not differ significantly between physicians (median 5.8 [3.4-7.6]) and LLMs (7.3 [4.7-9.7], p = 0.169), though CoT-LLMs achieved the highest scores (9.7 [8.5-11.0]). LLMs more often recommended supervised exercise (84.6% vs 30.0%, p = 0.002) and revascularization for quality of life (69.2% vs 20.0%, p = 0.004), whereas physicians favored cilostazol (60.0% vs 30.8%, p = 0.104). LLM responses had lower Readability μ values (46.9 vs 51.4, p = 0.012). Inter-rater reliability was highest for CoT-LLMs (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.98) versus physicians (ICC = 0.76).
Conclusion: LLM showed comparable guideline adherence to physicians although CoT models achieved the highest scores. The difference in physician and AI treatment preferences suggest the potential of AI as adjunct clinical tools and warrants further study.
背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)是一个全球性的健康挑战。人工智能(AI)的进步,如大型语言模型(LLMs)和思维链(CoT)推理,为临床推荐提供了新的方法。本研究比较了医生和人工智能对一个标准化PAD病例反应的可读性和指南依从性。方法:这项横断面研究收集了来自7个拉丁美洲国家和13个LLM系统(10个标准,3个CoT)的30名专科医生(11名心脏病专家,19名血管外科医生)的反馈。两组都讨论了诊断、治疗、风险和预后;法学硕士的反应是血管专家。采用五种经过验证的西班牙语可读性指数进行盲评价,并与2024 ACC/AHA多社会PAD指南进行比较。3位专家对指南依从性进行评分;采用非参数检验。结果:医生(中位数5.8[3.4-7.6])和LLMs(中位数7.3 [4.7-9.7],p = 0.169)之间的指南依从性无显著差异,尽管CoT-LLMs得分最高(9.7[8.5-11.0])。llm更倾向于推荐有监督的运动(84.6% vs 30.0%, p = 0.002)和血运重建术(69.2% vs 20.0%, p = 0.004),而医生更倾向于西洛他唑(60.0% vs 30.8%, p = 0.104)。LLM反应的Readability μ值较低(46.9 vs 51.4, p = 0.012)。量表间信度最高的是CoT-LLMs(类内相关系数[ICC] = 0.98)和内科医生(ICC = 0.76)。结论:尽管CoT模型获得了最高的分数,但LLM与医生的指南依从性相当。医生和人工智能治疗偏好的差异表明,人工智能作为辅助临床工具的潜力值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Comparing guideline adherence and readability: Artificial intelligence with deep learning versus specialized physicians in peripheral artery disease management.","authors":"Alfredo Verastegui, Regina Castaneda, Oliver Antonio Gómez-Gutiérrez, Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo, Oscar de la Torre, Diego Herrera Vegas, August Ysa, Manuel García-Toca, Mario Alejandro Fabiani","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251386394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251386394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a global health challenge. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), such as large language models (LLMs) and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, offer novel approaches for clinical recommendations. This study compared the readability and guideline adherence of responses from physicians and AI for a standardized PAD case.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study gathered responses from 30 specialized physicians (11 cardiologists, 19 vascular surgeons) across seven Latin American countries and 13 LLM systems (10 standard, three CoT). Both groups addressed diagnosis, treatment, risks, and prognosis; LLMs responded as vascular specialists. Responses were blindly evaluated with five validated Spanish readability indices and compared to the 2024 ACC/AHA multisocietal PAD guideline. Three experts scored guideline adherence; nonparametric tests were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Guideline adherence did not differ significantly between physicians (median 5.8 [3.4-7.6]) and LLMs (7.3 [4.7-9.7], <i>p</i> = 0.169), though CoT-LLMs achieved the highest scores (9.7 [8.5-11.0]). LLMs more often recommended supervised exercise (84.6% vs 30.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and revascularization for quality of life (69.2% vs 20.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.004), whereas physicians favored cilostazol (60.0% vs 30.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.104). LLM responses had lower Readability μ values (46.9 vs 51.4, <i>p</i> = 0.012). Inter-rater reliability was highest for CoT-LLMs (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.98) versus physicians (ICC = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLM showed comparable guideline adherence to physicians although CoT models achieved the highest scores. The difference in physician and AI treatment preferences suggest the potential of AI as adjunct clinical tools and warrants further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251386394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251379799
Kim G Smolderen, Mufti M Rahman, Gaëlle Romain, Lindsey Scierka, Jacob Cleman, Derek Knight, Aseem Vashist, Carlos Mena-Hurtado
Background: Peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are used to prevent amputation. However, imaging practices following PVI and their correlation with amputation outcomes remain unclear. Methods: Using Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative data (2017-2019), we identified imaging tests (ankle-brachial index [ABI], duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography angiography) ordered within 1 year post-PVI for CLTI. Site variability was assessed using median odds ratio (MOR) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The association between post-PVI imaging and 1-year major amputation was examined using competing risk analyses in a propensity-matched cohort. Results: We included 10,006 patients (mean age: 72.1 ± 11.0 years); 25.5% received no imaging. Over 50% of imaging tests were ABI and 83.1% were ordered within 3 months. Significant site variability was noted (none vs ⩾ 1: MOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.50-1.78; ICC 7.6%, 95% CI 5.2-9.9%; per one-unit increase in monthly volume: MOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05-1.07; ICC 9.4%, 95% CI 7.0-11.8%). Having none versus ⩾ 1 imaging tests post-PVI occurred more in patients with lower 1-year major amputation rates (5.7%, 95% CI 5.0-6.6% vs 8.8%, 95% CI 7.9-9.9%, p < 0.001; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.76, p < 0.001). More imaging ordered was correlated with a higher rate of major amputation (SHR 1.83, 95% CI 1.52-2.20, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Imaging practices post-PVI for CLTI are highly variable. Imaging tests are more often ordered in patients with higher amputation rates, but causality cannot be inferred. Additional information about symptom status and access to care are necessary. Standardized follow-up imaging protocols need to be developed and studied for improved clinical outcomes.
背景:外周血管干预(PVI)用于慢性肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)预防截肢。然而,PVI后的影像学实践及其与截肢结果的相关性尚不清楚。方法:使用与医疗保险相关的血管质量倡议数据(2017-2019),我们确定了在pvi后1年内为CLTI订购的影像学检查(踝关节-肱指数[ABI]、双相超声、磁共振血管造影、计算机断层血管造影)。使用中位优势比(MOR)和类内相关系数(ICC)评估位点变异性。在倾向匹配的队列中,使用竞争风险分析来检查pvi后成像与1年主要截肢之间的关系。结果:纳入10,006例患者(平均年龄:72.1±11.0岁);25.5%未接受影像学检查。超过50%的影像学检查是ABI, 83.1%是在3个月内订购的。注意到显著的部位变异性(无与小于或等于1相比:MOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.50-1.78; ICC 7.6%, 95% CI 5.2-9.9%;每一个单位增加的月量:MOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05-1.07; ICC 9.4%, 95% CI 7.0-11.8%)。在1年主要截肢率较低的患者中,pvi后无影像学检查与小于1影像学检查的发生率更高(5.7%,95% CI 5.0-6.6% vs 8.8%, 95% CI 7.9-9.9%, p < 0.001;亚分布风险比[SHR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.76, p < 0.001)。较多的影像学检查与较高的截肢率相关(SHR 1.83, 95% CI 1.52-2.20, p < 0.001)。结论:CLTI pvi后的影像学实践变化很大。在截肢率较高的患者中,影像学检查更常被要求进行,但因果关系无法推断。有关症状状态和获得护理的其他信息是必要的。需要制定和研究标准化的随访成像方案,以改善临床结果。
{"title":"Imaging practices following peripheral vascular intervention in chronic limb-threatening ischemia and association with amputation outcomes.","authors":"Kim G Smolderen, Mufti M Rahman, Gaëlle Romain, Lindsey Scierka, Jacob Cleman, Derek Knight, Aseem Vashist, Carlos Mena-Hurtado","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251379799","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251379799","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are used to prevent amputation. However, imaging practices following PVI and their correlation with amputation outcomes remain unclear. <b>Methods:</b> Using Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative data (2017-2019), we identified imaging tests (ankle-brachial index [ABI], duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography angiography) ordered within 1 year post-PVI for CLTI. Site variability was assessed using median odds ratio (MOR) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The association between post-PVI imaging and 1-year major amputation was examined using competing risk analyses in a propensity-matched cohort. <b>Results:</b> We included 10,006 patients (mean age: 72.1 ± 11.0 years); 25.5% received no imaging. Over 50% of imaging tests were ABI and 83.1% were ordered within 3 months. Significant site variability was noted (none vs ⩾ 1: MOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.50-1.78; ICC 7.6%, 95% CI 5.2-9.9%; per one-unit increase in monthly volume: MOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05-1.07; ICC 9.4%, 95% CI 7.0-11.8%). Having none versus ⩾ 1 imaging tests post-PVI occurred more in patients with lower 1-year major amputation rates (5.7%, 95% CI 5.0-6.6% vs 8.8%, 95% CI 7.9-9.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.001). More imaging ordered was correlated with a higher rate of major amputation (SHR 1.83, 95% CI 1.52-2.20, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Imaging practices post-PVI for CLTI are highly variable. Imaging tests are more often ordered in patients with higher amputation rates, but causality cannot be inferred. Additional information about symptom status and access to care are necessary. Standardized follow-up imaging protocols need to be developed and studied for improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251379799"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251389874
Caroline H Kim, Klaus D Hagspiel
{"title":"Images in Vascular Medicine: Middle mesenteric artery.","authors":"Caroline H Kim, Klaus D Hagspiel","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251389874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251389874","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251389874"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-14DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251369466
Andrew H Schulick, Elizabeth V Ratchford, Joseph M White
{"title":"Vascular Disease Patient Information Page: What to expect with endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD).","authors":"Andrew H Schulick, Elizabeth V Ratchford, Joseph M White","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251369466","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251369466","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"746-751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251388976
Muhammad U Khalid, Syed Bukhari, Emmanuel Akintoye, Meghann McCarthy, Zoran Popović, Michael Z Tong, Pulkit Chaudhury
{"title":"Images in Vascular Medicine: Coronary aneurysm and thrombosis as a late sequela of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD).","authors":"Muhammad U Khalid, Syed Bukhari, Emmanuel Akintoye, Meghann McCarthy, Zoran Popović, Michael Z Tong, Pulkit Chaudhury","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251388976","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251388976","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"742-743"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145496834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (Exercise-TcPO2) that has been validated with a constant-load treadmill protocol, is useful to assess patients with suspected lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). To date, nothing is known about its use with a graded protocol. The aim of this study is to compare the Exercise-TcPO2 results obtained in patients with suspected PAD using a graded Gardner-Skinner (3.2 km/h, 2% grade increase every 2 min) versus a constant modified Strandness (3.2 km/h, 10% grade) treadmill test.
Methods: Patients with suspected PAD were assessed twice on the same day on a treadmill using the modified Strandness (Strand) followed by the Gardner-Skinner (Gard) tests. In both tests, the decrease from resting oxygen pressure (DROP) indexes were measured at the buttock and calf levels as previously validated. A DROPStrand index ⩽ -15 mmHg was considered positive for the diagnosis of PAD. The relationship between DROPGard and DROPStrand as well as DROP value differences between the two tests and concordances were studied.
Results: This prospective study included 40 patients. Using a linear mixed model, the relationship between DROPGard and DROPStrand was defined as DROPGard = 0.647 × DROPStrand - 1.858. The mean difference between DROPGard and DROPStrand was -4.3 ± 7.3 mmHg. Positive and negative agreements were 78.0% and 86.3%, respectively. The kappa coefficient between DROPGard and DROPStrand was 0.65 [0.54; 0.77].
Conclusion: Exercise-TcPO2 results using the Gardner-Skinner and modified Strandness treadmill tests were highly correlated. This study suggests the use of a DROPGard value ⩽ -12 mmHg to diagnose PAD when performing Exercise-TcPO2 with a Gardner-Skinner test. However, this cut-off value should be confirmed against an imaging gold standard. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03186391.
{"title":"Relationship between exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurements with constant and graded treadmill tests.","authors":"Cindy Vannier, Adélaïde Guézais, Marjolaine Talbot, Alexis Le Faucheur, Guillaume Mahé","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251379810","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251379810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (Exercise-TcPO<sub>2</sub>) that has been validated with a constant-load treadmill protocol, is useful to assess patients with suspected lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). To date, nothing is known about its use with a graded protocol. The aim of this study is to compare the Exercise-TcPO<sub>2</sub> results obtained in patients with suspected PAD using a graded Gardner-Skinner (3.2 km/h, 2% grade increase every 2 min) versus a constant modified Strandness (3.2 km/h, 10% grade) treadmill test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with suspected PAD were assessed twice on the same day on a treadmill using the modified Strandness (Strand) followed by the Gardner-Skinner (Gard) tests. In both tests, the decrease from resting oxygen pressure (DROP) indexes were measured at the buttock and calf levels as previously validated. A DROP<sub>Strand</sub> index ⩽ -15 mmHg was considered positive for the diagnosis of PAD. The relationship between DROP<sub>Gard</sub> and DROP<sub>Strand</sub> as well as DROP value differences between the two tests and concordances were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This prospective study included 40 patients. Using a linear mixed model, the relationship between DROP<sub>Gard</sub> and DROP<sub>Strand</sub> was defined as DROP<sub>Gard</sub> = 0.647 × DROP<sub>Strand</sub> - 1.858. The mean difference between DROP<sub>Gard</sub> and DROP<sub>Strand</sub> was -4.3 ± 7.3 mmHg. Positive and negative agreements were 78.0% and 86.3%, respectively. The kappa coefficient between DROP<sub>Gard</sub> and DROP<sub>Strand</sub> was 0.65 [0.54; 0.77].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise-TcPO<sub>2</sub> results using the Gardner-Skinner and modified Strandness treadmill tests were highly correlated. This study suggests the use of a DROP<sub>Gard</sub> value ⩽ -12 mmHg to diagnose PAD when performing Exercise-TcPO<sub>2</sub> with a Gardner-Skinner test. However, this cut-off value should be confirmed against an imaging gold standard. <b>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03186391</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"676-682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-21DOI: 10.1177/1358863X251336736
Beth L Cheshire, Sarah J Messeder, Coral J Pepper, Lucy C Beishon, Rob D Sayers, John Sm Houghton
This systematic review aimed to describe the association between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and cognitive impairment or dementia. We included studies reporting on the association between PAD (defined by ankle-brachial index ⩽ 0.9) and cognitive function in adult populations. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to January 2025. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Exposure effects (ROBINS-E) tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken structured by cognitive outcome and study design. Thirty-eight studies were included in the review (58,586 participants). The results provide evidence that PAD is associated with cognitive impairment. Seventeen (81%) cross-sectional studies and four (67%) longitudinal studies reported associations of PAD with poorer cognitive performance or increased risk of cognitive impairment. Impaired memory and processing speed were most frequently associated with PAD. PAD was also associated with increased dementia risk in cross-sectional (odds ratios = 1.50-2.41) and longitudinal studies (hazard ratios = 1.03-2.40), although proportionally fewer longitudinal studies reported significant association of PAD with dementia. Results suggest increased prevalence of cognitive impairment, independent of cardiovascular risk factors and cerebrovascular disease. Awareness of the prevalence of cognitive impairment and its potential impact on treatment adherence and engagement in a healthy lifestyle is important for clinicians treating patients with PAD. Screening for cognitive impairment in those with PAD may aid early diagnosis and management of cognitive impairment in this high-risk population. Further research is required to determine whether screening for and optimal management of PAD has cognitive benefits. (PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023399608).
{"title":"Association of cognitive impairment and peripheral artery disease (PAD): A systematic review.","authors":"Beth L Cheshire, Sarah J Messeder, Coral J Pepper, Lucy C Beishon, Rob D Sayers, John Sm Houghton","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251336736","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X251336736","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to describe the association between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and cognitive impairment or dementia. We included studies reporting on the association between PAD (defined by ankle-brachial index ⩽ 0.9) and cognitive function in adult populations. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL were systematically searched from inception to January 2025. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Exposure effects (ROBINS-E) tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken structured by cognitive outcome and study design. Thirty-eight studies were included in the review (58,586 participants). The results provide evidence that PAD is associated with cognitive impairment. Seventeen (81%) cross-sectional studies and four (67%) longitudinal studies reported associations of PAD with poorer cognitive performance or increased risk of cognitive impairment. Impaired memory and processing speed were most frequently associated with PAD. PAD was also associated with increased dementia risk in cross-sectional (odds ratios = 1.50-2.41) and longitudinal studies (hazard ratios = 1.03-2.40), although proportionally fewer longitudinal studies reported significant association of PAD with dementia. Results suggest increased prevalence of cognitive impairment, independent of cardiovascular risk factors and cerebrovascular disease. Awareness of the prevalence of cognitive impairment and its potential impact on treatment adherence and engagement in a healthy lifestyle is important for clinicians treating patients with PAD. Screening for cognitive impairment in those with PAD may aid early diagnosis and management of cognitive impairment in this high-risk population. Further research is required to determine whether screening for and optimal management of PAD has cognitive benefits. <b>(PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023399608)</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"724-739"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12664932/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144112086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}