Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-27DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241291450
Mateja Kaja Jezovnik, Pavel Poredos, Peter Poredos
Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at increased risk of perioperative stroke. Carotid atherosclerosis has been identified as an independent risk factor for stroke during and in the early postoperative period of cardiac surgery. However, the pathogenesis of peri-CABG stroke is multifactorial and frequently involves other noncarotid causes, such as cardiac emboli and aortic atheroma. Therefore, routine population-wide screening of carotid stenosis is not recommended, but target screening of patients at high risk of carotid-related perioperative stroke can have benefits. Carotid duplex sonography is recommended as an initial screening tool. Elimination of carotid stenosis before cardiac surgery is indicated in patients in whom carotid atherosclerosis is suspected to be the primary contributor to perioperative stroke. In patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis, an individualized revascularization approach, including simultaneous or staged procedures, is advocated. The prevailing consensus is that synchronous surgery is safer than staged procedures. Carotid artery stenting represents a less invasive alternative, but its role in high-risk patients requires further investigation. In conclusion, the risk of perioperative stroke in patients undergoing CABG involves different factors, and carotid artery stenosis is involved in its pathogenesis only in some patients. Therefore, individualized approaches and careful consideration of patient risk factors are essential in determining the need for carotid screening and revascularization before CABG.
{"title":"Benefits of prophylactic carotid revascularization in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A narrative review.","authors":"Mateja Kaja Jezovnik, Pavel Poredos, Peter Poredos","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241291450","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X241291450","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at increased risk of perioperative stroke. Carotid atherosclerosis has been identified as an independent risk factor for stroke during and in the early postoperative period of cardiac surgery. However, the pathogenesis of peri-CABG stroke is multifactorial and frequently involves other noncarotid causes, such as cardiac emboli and aortic atheroma. Therefore, routine population-wide screening of carotid stenosis is not recommended, but target screening of patients at high risk of carotid-related perioperative stroke can have benefits. Carotid duplex sonography is recommended as an initial screening tool. Elimination of carotid stenosis before cardiac surgery is indicated in patients in whom carotid atherosclerosis is suspected to be the primary contributor to perioperative stroke. In patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis, an individualized revascularization approach, including simultaneous or staged procedures, is advocated. The prevailing consensus is that synchronous surgery is safer than staged procedures. Carotid artery stenting represents a less invasive alternative, but its role in high-risk patients requires further investigation. In conclusion, the risk of perioperative stroke in patients undergoing CABG involves different factors, and carotid artery stenosis is involved in its pathogenesis only in some patients. Therefore, individualized approaches and careful consideration of patient risk factors are essential in determining the need for carotid screening and revascularization before CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"93-102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241306354
Kevin P Cohoon, Stanislav Henkin, Roger T Tomihama, Sneha E Thomas, Mateo Porres-Aguilar, Nichole E Brunton, Deborah Hornacek, Eric A Secemsky
{"title":"Implementing the 2024 ACC/AHA Multisocietal PAD guidelines into clinical practice: Key changes from the 2016 guidelines.","authors":"Kevin P Cohoon, Stanislav Henkin, Roger T Tomihama, Sneha E Thomas, Mateo Porres-Aguilar, Nichole E Brunton, Deborah Hornacek, Eric A Secemsky","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241306354","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X241306354","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"110-113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142878139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241305093
Bhavraj Khalsa, Meena Archie, Babak Nazer, Mahmood K Razavi
Background: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) increases perfusion in peripheral artery disease (PAD). This pilot study assessed the safety and effectiveness of a noninvasive TUS device in patients with advanced PAD.
Methods: A phased array of TUS transducers was fabricated on a wearable sleeve, designed to sonicate the posterior and anterior tibial arteries (and their collaterals) at the calf level. Twelve patients with PAD (Rutherford classes 3-5) were enrolled in a single-arm study in which they underwent 30-40 daily 90-minute TUS sessions to the diseased limb. Changes in pedal flow and tissue oxygenation (StO2) were measured by laser speckle and spatial frequency domain imaging, respectively. A subset of five patients underwent evaluation by laser Doppler, transcutaneous oximetry (TcPO2), and quality of life questionnaires (Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire [VascuQoL] and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire [WIQ]).
Results: Eleven out of 12 enrolled patients completed the study. During 90-minute TUS sessions pedal flow improved by 180% (p < 0.001) on laser speckle imaging, and 18% (p = 0.12) on laser Doppler. Tissue oxygenation improved by 18% (p = 0.43) on TcPO2 and by 6% (p = 0.097) on StO2. After all sessions, tissue oxygenation improved by 17% (p = 0.020) on StO2, without significant changes in laser Doppler (+39%, p = 0.41) or TcPO2 (-3%, p = 0.70), which was largely in the normal range (56 ± 15 mmHg) at baseline. VascuQoL improved by 2.4 points (14%, p = 0.080) and WIQ improved by 8.2 points (11%, p = 0.053).
Conclusions: TUS for patients with symptomatic PAD was safe and well tolerated. Most metrics of tissue perfusion and oxygenation improved, but future sham-controlled studies are needed and planned.
{"title":"Noninvasive therapeutic ultrasound to increase perfusion in chronic limb-threatening ischemia: An early feasibility study.","authors":"Bhavraj Khalsa, Meena Archie, Babak Nazer, Mahmood K Razavi","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241305093","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X241305093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preclinical studies have demonstrated that therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) increases perfusion in peripheral artery disease (PAD). This pilot study assessed the safety and effectiveness of a noninvasive TUS device in patients with advanced PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phased array of TUS transducers was fabricated on a wearable sleeve, designed to sonicate the posterior and anterior tibial arteries (and their collaterals) at the calf level. Twelve patients with PAD (Rutherford classes 3-5) were enrolled in a single-arm study in which they underwent 30-40 daily 90-minute TUS sessions to the diseased limb. Changes in pedal flow and tissue oxygenation (StO<sub>2</sub>) were measured by laser speckle and spatial frequency domain imaging, respectively. A subset of five patients underwent evaluation by laser Doppler, transcutaneous oximetry (TcPO<sub>2</sub>), and quality of life questionnaires (Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire [VascuQoL] and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire [WIQ]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven out of 12 enrolled patients completed the study. During 90-minute TUS sessions pedal flow improved by 180% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) on laser speckle imaging, and 18% (<i>p</i> = 0.12) on laser Doppler. Tissue oxygenation improved by 18% (<i>p</i> = 0.43) on TcPO<sub>2</sub> and by 6% (<i>p</i> = 0.097) on StO<sub>2</sub>. After all sessions, tissue oxygenation improved by 17% (<i>p</i> = 0.020) on StO<sub>2</sub>, without significant changes in laser Doppler (+39%, <i>p</i> = 0.41) or TcPO<sub>2</sub> (-3%, <i>p</i> = 0.70), which was largely in the normal range (56 ± 15 mmHg) at baseline. VascuQoL improved by 2.4 points (14%, <i>p</i> = 0.080) and WIQ improved by 8.2 points (11%, <i>p</i> = 0.053).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TUS for patients with symptomatic PAD was safe and well tolerated. Most metrics of tissue perfusion and oxygenation improved, but future sham-controlled studies are needed and planned.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142878143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-11DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241292545
Carmen Pajarillo, Gaëlle Romain, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Scott Grubman, Christopher Schenck, Jonathan Kluger, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado
Introduction: As the role of social determinants in carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes remains unclear, we investigated the association between the Distressed Community Index (DCI) (zip-code based) and post-CAS mortality/stroke outcomes.
Methods: We analyzed patients undergoing CAS from 2015 to 2019 using the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Quality Initiative database. Patients were grouped based on high (DCI ⩾ 60) and low (DCI < 60) community distress. We analyzed 36-month mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox regression, and 36-month stroke using cumulative incidence function curves and Fine-Gray models.
Results: The final cohort included 8717 patients (3032 DCI ⩾ 60), with a mean DCI score of 46.2 (± 28.5) and mean age of 74.7 (± 7.8) years. Most participants were men (64.3%), White (92.7%), and non-Hispanic/Latino (97.7%). There was no significant difference in the 36-month mortality incidence between high and low community distress groups (25.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0.22), and no significant association between high community distress and mortality (unadjusted HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.90-1.21; adjusted HR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.89-1.17). The high community distress group experienced an elevated 36-month stroke incidence (26.8% vs 22.4%, p = 0.048), but no significant association with stroke was observed (unadjusted sub-HR: 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.24; adjusted sub-HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.92-1.16).
Conclusion: Our cohort showed underrepresentation in terms of sex, race, and ethnicity, with a skewed DCI distribution towards lower community distress. Contrary to what we know about community distress, no independent association between higher community distress and post-CAS stroke/mortality risk was found. Future work must examine whether accessibility barriers and selective CAS allocation explain our results.
导言:由于社会决定因素在颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)结果中的作用仍不明确,我们研究了贫困社区指数(DCI)(基于邮政编码)与CAS术后死亡率/卒中结果之间的关联:我们使用与医疗保险索赔相关的血管质量倡议数据库分析了 2015 年至 2019 年接受 CAS 的患者。根据高(DCI ⩾60)和低(DCI <60)社区窘迫程度对患者进行分组。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线和分层 Cox 回归分析了 36 个月的死亡率,使用累积发病率函数曲线和 Fine-Gray 模型分析了 36 个月的中风情况:最终队列包括 8717 名患者(3032 名 DCI ⩾60),平均 DCI 得分为 46.2(± 28.5)分,平均年龄为 74.7(± 7.8)岁。大多数参与者为男性(64.3%)、白人(92.7%)和非西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人(97.7%)。高社区困境组和低社区困境组的 36 个月死亡率无明显差异(25.6% vs 23.5%,P = 0.22),高社区困境与死亡率之间也无明显关联(未调整 HR:1.04;95% CI 0.90-1.21;调整 HR:1.02;95% CI 0.89-1.17)。高度社区窘迫组的 36 个月中风发病率较高(26.8% vs 22.4%,p = 0.048),但未观察到与中风有显著关联(未调整次 HR:1.12;95% CI 1.00-1.24;调整次 HR:1.03;95% CI 0.92-1.16):我们的队列在性别、种族和民族方面都显示出代表性不足,DCI分布偏向于较低的社区痛苦。与我们对社区窘迫的了解相反,我们没有发现较高的社区窘迫与 CAS 后中风/死亡风险之间存在独立联系。未来的工作必须研究交通障碍和选择性 CAS 分配是否能解释我们的结果。
{"title":"Lack of diversity in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting: Implications for the Distressed Community Index.","authors":"Carmen Pajarillo, Gaëlle Romain, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Scott Grubman, Christopher Schenck, Jonathan Kluger, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241292545","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X241292545","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As the role of social determinants in carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes remains unclear, we investigated the association between the Distressed Community Index (DCI) (zip-code based) and post-CAS mortality/stroke outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patients undergoing CAS from 2015 to 2019 using the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Quality Initiative database. Patients were grouped based on high (DCI ⩾ 60) and low (DCI < 60) community distress. We analyzed 36-month mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox regression, and 36-month stroke using cumulative incidence function curves and Fine-Gray models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort included 8717 patients (3032 DCI ⩾ 60), with a mean DCI score of 46.2 (± 28.5) and mean age of 74.7 (± 7.8) years. Most participants were men (64.3%), White (92.7%), and non-Hispanic/Latino (97.7%). There was no significant difference in the 36-month mortality incidence between high and low community distress groups (25.6% vs 23.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.22), and no significant association between high community distress and mortality (unadjusted HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.90-1.21; adjusted HR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.89-1.17). The high community distress group experienced an elevated 36-month stroke incidence (26.8% vs 22.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.048), but no significant association with stroke was observed (unadjusted sub-HR: 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.24; adjusted sub-HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.92-1.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our cohort showed underrepresentation in terms of sex, race, and ethnicity, with a skewed DCI distribution towards lower community distress. Contrary to what we know about community distress, no independent association between higher community distress and post-CAS stroke/mortality risk was found. Future work must examine whether accessibility barriers and selective CAS allocation explain our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"27-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241287692
Shiv Bhakta, Mohammed M Chowdhury, Jason M Tarkin, James Hf Rudd, Elizabeth A Warburton, Nicholas R Evans
Introduction: 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron-emission tomography (PET) is increasingly being used to measure microcalcification in atherosclerotic disease in vivo. Correlations have been drawn between sodium fluoride uptake and the presence of high-risk plaque features, as well as its association with clinical atherosclerotic sequelae. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of NaF uptake on PET imaging and its relation to symptomatic and asymptomatic disease.
Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, via searching the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases up to May 2024. The search strategy included the terms 'NaF', 'PET', and 'plaque', and all studies with data regarding the degree of microcalcification, as measured by 18F-NaF uptake in symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, were included. Analysis involved calculating mean differences between uptake values and comparison using a random-effects model.
Results: A total of 16 articles, involving 423 participants, were included in the meta-analysis (10 carotid artery studies, five coronary artery studies, and one in peripheral vascular disease). Comparing 18F-NaF uptake in symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, a mean difference of 0.43 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.57; p < 0.0001, I2 = 65%) was noted in studies comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques in the same participant, with a significant difference in effect based on arterial territory studied (χ2 = 12.68, p = 0.0018). In studies of participants with and without symptomatic disease, there was no significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques (mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.80, p = 0.28, I2 = 85%).
Conclusions: PET imaging using 18F-NaF can detect differences in microcalcification between symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques within, but not between, individuals, and thus, is a marker of symptomatic disease. The standardization of 18F-NaF PET imaging protocols, and its future use as a risk stratification tool or outcome measure, requires further study. (PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023451363).
简介:18F-氟化钠(NaF)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)正越来越多地被用于测量体内动脉粥样硬化疾病的微钙化。氟化钠摄取量与高风险斑块特征的存在以及与临床动脉粥样硬化后遗症之间存在相关性。本研究的目的是对 PET 成像的氟化钠摄取量及其与无症状和无症状疾病的关系进行荟萃分析:根据PRISMA指南,通过检索Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Cochrane Library、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science Core Collection数据库(截至2024年5月)进行了系统性综述。检索策略包括 "NaF"、"PET "和 "斑块 "等术语,并纳入了所有通过有症状和无症状动脉粥样硬化斑块的18F-NaF摄取量测量微钙化程度的研究数据。分析包括计算摄取值之间的平均差异,并使用随机效应模型进行比较:荟萃分析共纳入16篇文章,涉及423名参与者(10项颈动脉研究、5项冠状动脉研究和1项外周血管疾病研究)。比较无症状和无症状动脉粥样硬化斑块的18F-NaF摄取量,发现在比较同一参与者的无症状和无症状斑块的研究中,平均差异为0.43(95% CI 0.29至0.57;p < 0.0001,I2 = 65%),根据研究的动脉区域,效果差异显著(χ2 = 12.68,p = 0.0018)。在对有症状和无症状的参与者进行的研究中,有症状和无症状斑块之间没有显著差异(平均差异为0.27,95% CI -0.26至0.80,p = 0.28,I2 = 85%):结论:使用18F-NaF的PET成像能检测出个体内部有症状和无症状动脉粥样硬化斑块之间微钙化的差异,但不能检测出个体之间的差异,因此是无症状疾病的标志物。18F-NaF PET 成像方案的标准化及其未来作为风险分层工具或结果测量指标的应用还需要进一步研究。(PROSPERO注册编号:CRD42023451363)。
{"title":"<sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake on vascular PET imaging in symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Shiv Bhakta, Mohammed M Chowdhury, Jason M Tarkin, James Hf Rudd, Elizabeth A Warburton, Nicholas R Evans","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241287692","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X241287692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron-emission tomography (PET) is increasingly being used to measure microcalcification in atherosclerotic disease in vivo. Correlations have been drawn between sodium fluoride uptake and the presence of high-risk plaque features, as well as its association with clinical atherosclerotic sequelae. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of NaF uptake on PET imaging and its relation to symptomatic and asymptomatic disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, via searching the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases up to May 2024. The search strategy included the terms 'NaF', 'PET', and 'plaque', and all studies with data regarding the degree of microcalcification, as measured by <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake in symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, were included. Analysis involved calculating mean differences between uptake values and comparison using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 articles, involving 423 participants, were included in the meta-analysis (10 carotid artery studies, five coronary artery studies, and one in peripheral vascular disease). Comparing <sup>18</sup>F-NaF uptake in symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques, a mean difference of 0.43 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.57; <i>p</i> < 0.0001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 65%) was noted in studies comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques in the same participant, with a significant difference in effect based on arterial territory studied (χ<sup>2</sup> = 12.68, <i>p</i> = 0.0018). In studies of participants with and without symptomatic disease, there was no significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques (mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.80, <i>p</i> = 0.28, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PET imaging using <sup>18</sup>F-NaF can detect differences in microcalcification between symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques within, but not between, individuals, and thus, is a marker of symptomatic disease. The standardization of <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET imaging protocols, and its future use as a risk stratification tool or outcome measure, requires further study. <b>(PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023451363)</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804149/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-13DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241282635
Emeraude Rivoire, Nellie Della Schiava, Olivier Rouvière, Gaele Pagnoux, Tae-Hee Cho, Antoine Millon, Anne Long
A carotid web (CaWeb), otherwise known as a carotid bulb diaphragm, is a spur of intimal fibrous tissue extending into the carotid bulb. It is a rare, underdiagnosed cause of ischemic strokes in young people. The purpose of this narrative review was to provide an update on CaWebs, highlighting recent evolutions in their management. We undertook a comprehensive literature search on main electronic databases - MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE - using a dedicated equation to include studies up to February 13, 2024. We also searched for the most recent guidelines about carotid disease or stroke including CaWeb management. A CaWeb is found in up to 10% of young patients, particularly young women, with severe anterior stroke due to an arterial-arterial embolism from the intra-nidus thrombus. Most patients with a CaWeb have less than 50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound, and diagnosis is mostly obtained by computed tomography angiography. When applying traditional stenosis criteria for symptomatic disease (> 50% stenosis), this highly morbid condition is easily overlooked, leading to recurrent strokes. Antithrombotic treatment is associated with a high recurrence rate of stroke after the index event. The first-line treatment of symptomatic CaWebs is increasingly based on endarterectomy or stenting. The lack of recommendations before 2021 and recent discordant guidelines make CaWeb management complex. No guidelines are available to manage patients with asymptomatic CaWebs. Results from ongoing multicenter registries will be useful in guiding management decisions.
{"title":"Carotid web: Pathophysiology, diagnostic, and therapeutic options. A narrative review.","authors":"Emeraude Rivoire, Nellie Della Schiava, Olivier Rouvière, Gaele Pagnoux, Tae-Hee Cho, Antoine Millon, Anne Long","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241282635","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X241282635","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A carotid web (CaWeb), otherwise known as a carotid bulb diaphragm, is a spur of intimal fibrous tissue extending into the carotid bulb. It is a rare, underdiagnosed cause of ischemic strokes in young people. The purpose of this narrative review was to provide an update on CaWebs, highlighting recent evolutions in their management. We undertook a comprehensive literature search on main electronic databases - MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE - using a dedicated equation to include studies up to February 13, 2024. We also searched for the most recent guidelines about carotid disease or stroke including CaWeb management. A CaWeb is found in up to 10% of young patients, particularly young women, with severe anterior stroke due to an arterial-arterial embolism from the intra-nidus thrombus. Most patients with a CaWeb have less than 50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound, and diagnosis is mostly obtained by computed tomography angiography. When applying traditional stenosis criteria for symptomatic disease (> 50% stenosis), this highly morbid condition is easily overlooked, leading to recurrent strokes. Antithrombotic treatment is associated with a high recurrence rate of stroke after the index event. The first-line treatment of symptomatic CaWebs is increasingly based on endarterectomy or stenting. The lack of recommendations before 2021 and recent discordant guidelines make CaWeb management complex. No guidelines are available to manage patients with asymptomatic CaWebs. Results from ongoing multicenter registries will be useful in guiding management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"82-92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241292023
Behnood Bikdeli, Hannah Leyva, Alfonso Muriel, Zhenqiu Lin, Gregory Piazza, Candrika D Khairani, Rachel P Rosovsky, Ghazaleh Mehdipour, Michelle L O'Donoghue, Olga Madridano, Juan Bosco Lopez-Saez, Meritxell Mellado, Ana Maria Diaz Brasero, Elvira Grandone, Primavera A Spagnolo, Yuan Lu, Laurent Bertoletti, Luciano López-Jiménez, Manuel Jesús Núñez, Ángeles Blanco-Molina, Marie Gerhard-Herman, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Shannon M Bates, David Jimenez, Harlan M Krumholz, Manuel Monreal
Introduction: Sex differences exist in risk factors and comorbidities of older adults (aged ⩾ 65 years) with pulmonary embolism (PE). Clinically relevant sex-based treatment disparities for PE have not been adequately addressed. The few existing show conflicting results due to small sample size (type II error) and suboptimal methods (overreliance on p-value, which may detect differences of small clinical relevance).
Methods: We assessed sex differences in anticoagulation and advanced therapies for PE in older adults, utilizing data from Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica (RIETE), a large PE registry with predominant participation from Europe, and data from US Medicare beneficiaries. We prespecified a standardized difference (SRD) > 10% as clinically relevant. RIETE included 33,462 (57.7% female) and Medicare included 102,391 (55.0% female) older adults with PE.
Results: In RIETE, there were no overall sex differences in the use of anticoagulation (median: 181 vs 180 days, SRD < 1%), fibrinolysis (SRD < 3%), thrombectomy (SRD < 2%), or inferior vena cava (IVC) filters (SRD: 4.4%). However, fibrinolytic therapy (systemic or catheter-based) was less often used in female than male patients with intermediate-risk PE (8.0% vs 12.1%, SRD: 13.6%). No sex differences were noted with advanced PE therapies in Medicare beneficiaries. In unadjusted analyses, fibrinolysis and IVC filter placement were more frequent in Medicare than RIETE participants regardless of sex (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In a predominantly European PE registry and a US study of older adults, there were no overall sex differences in anticoagulation patterns or advanced therapy utilization. Future studies should determine if sex disparities in fibrinolytic therapy for intermediate-risk PE and greater use of advanced therapies in US older adults correlate with clinical outcomes.
导言:患有肺栓塞(PE)的老年人(65 岁以上)在风险因素和合并症方面存在性别差异。与临床相关的基于性别的肺栓塞治疗差异尚未得到充分研究。由于样本量小(II 型误差)和方法不理想(过度依赖 p 值,可能检测出临床相关性较小的差异),现有的少数研究显示出相互矛盾的结果:我们评估了老年人PE抗凝和先进疗法的性别差异,利用的数据来自Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica (RIETE),这是一个主要来自欧洲的大型PE登记处,数据来自美国医疗保险受益人。我们预设标准化差异(SRD)> 10%为临床相关性。RIETE 纳入了 33,462 名(57.7% 为女性)患有 PE 的老年人,Medicare 纳入了 102,391 名(55.0% 为女性)患有 PE 的老年人:在 RIETE 中,使用抗凝疗法(中位数:181 天 vs 180 天,SRD < 1%)、纤维蛋白溶解疗法(SRD < 3%)、血栓切除术(SRD < 2%)或下腔静脉 (IVC) 过滤器(SRD:4.4%)的总体性别差异不大。然而,女性中危 PE 患者使用纤溶疗法(全身或导管疗法)的比例低于男性(8.0% vs 12.1%,SRD:13.6%)。在医疗保险受益人中,高级 PE 治疗方法没有性别差异。在未经调整的分析中,无论性别如何,Medicare 参与者比 RIETE 参与者更常接受纤维蛋白溶解和 IVC 滤器置入治疗(P < 0.001):结论:在一项主要针对欧洲 PE 患者的登记和一项针对美国老年人的研究中,抗凝模式或先进疗法的使用总体上没有性别差异。未来的研究应确定中危 PE 纤维蛋白溶解疗法的性别差异以及美国老年人更多地使用先进疗法是否与临床结果相关。
{"title":"Sex differences in treatment strategies for pulmonary embolism in older adults: The SERIOUS-PE study of RIETE participants and US Medicare beneficiaries.","authors":"Behnood Bikdeli, Hannah Leyva, Alfonso Muriel, Zhenqiu Lin, Gregory Piazza, Candrika D Khairani, Rachel P Rosovsky, Ghazaleh Mehdipour, Michelle L O'Donoghue, Olga Madridano, Juan Bosco Lopez-Saez, Meritxell Mellado, Ana Maria Diaz Brasero, Elvira Grandone, Primavera A Spagnolo, Yuan Lu, Laurent Bertoletti, Luciano López-Jiménez, Manuel Jesús Núñez, Ángeles Blanco-Molina, Marie Gerhard-Herman, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Shannon M Bates, David Jimenez, Harlan M Krumholz, Manuel Monreal","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241292023","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X241292023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sex differences exist in risk factors and comorbidities of older adults (aged ⩾ 65 years) with pulmonary embolism (PE). Clinically relevant sex-based treatment disparities for PE have not been adequately addressed. The few existing show conflicting results due to small sample size (type II error) and suboptimal methods (overreliance on <i>p</i>-value, which may detect differences of small clinical relevance).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed sex differences in anticoagulation and advanced therapies for PE in older adults, utilizing data from Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica (RIETE), a large PE registry with predominant participation from Europe, and data from US Medicare beneficiaries. We prespecified a standardized difference (SRD) > 10% as clinically relevant. RIETE included 33,462 (57.7% female) and Medicare included 102,391 (55.0% female) older adults with PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In RIETE, there were no overall sex differences in the use of anticoagulation (median: 181 vs 180 days, SRD < 1%), fibrinolysis (SRD < 3%), thrombectomy (SRD < 2%), or inferior vena cava (IVC) filters (SRD: 4.4%). However, fibrinolytic therapy (systemic or catheter-based) was less often used in female than male patients with intermediate-risk PE (8.0% vs 12.1%, SRD: 13.6%). No sex differences were noted with advanced PE therapies in Medicare beneficiaries. In unadjusted analyses, fibrinolysis and IVC filter placement were more frequent in Medicare than RIETE participants regardless of sex (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a predominantly European PE registry and a US study of older adults, there were no overall sex differences in anticoagulation patterns or advanced therapy utilization. Future studies should determine if sex disparities in fibrinolytic therapy for intermediate-risk PE and greater use of advanced therapies in US older adults correlate with clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"58-66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142717203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241287691
Firas Hentati, Milan Kaushik, Shantum Misra, Brett J Carroll, William B Earle, Eric A Secemsky
{"title":"Death certificate documentation is inaccurate for most patients with acute pulmonary embolism.","authors":"Firas Hentati, Milan Kaushik, Shantum Misra, Brett J Carroll, William B Earle, Eric A Secemsky","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241287691","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1358863X241287691","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"79-81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142476008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-27DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241309839
Connie N Hess, Ashley Daffron, Mark R Nehler, Michael Szarek, Christopher P Cannon, Judith Hsia, Joseph J Saseen, Marc P Bonaca
{"title":"Early combination lipid-lowering therapy is associated with greater achievement of goal LDL-C: Insights from the OPTIMIZE PAD-1 trial.","authors":"Connie N Hess, Ashley Daffron, Mark R Nehler, Michael Szarek, Christopher P Cannon, Judith Hsia, Joseph J Saseen, Marc P Bonaca","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241309839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241309839","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X241309839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143048179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1177/1358863X241309326
Siem A Willems, Jelle A Nieuwstraten, Abbey Schepers, Jan van Schaik, Pim van den Hoven, Joost R van der Vorst, Jaap F Hamming, Jeroen Jwm Brouwers
Foot ulceration is a significant and growing health problem worldwide, particularly due to rises in diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral artery disease. The prediction of ulcer healing remains a major challenge. In patients with foot ulcers, medial arterial calcification (MAC) can be present as a result of concomitant DM or chronic kidney disease and is a prognostic factor for unfavorable outcome. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the prognostic reliability of bedside tests to predict ulcer healing and wound healing after minor amputation in patients prone to MAC, following PRISMA guidelines. Primary endpoints were the positive and negative likelihood ratios for ulcer healing. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the QUIPS-tool. A total of 35 studies were included, predominantly investigating transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2), followed by ankle-brachial index and toe pressure. None of these bedside tests effectively provided an acceptable trade-off between predicting healing and nonhealing. A TcPO2 below 30 mmHg was most closely associated with nonhealing of an ulcer. The same applied to wound healing after minor amputation, in which none of the bedside tests was able to sufficiently predict healing or nonhealing. To conclude, currently used bedside tests lack acceptable prognostic performance for ulcer healing and healing after minor amputation in patients prone to MAC. Future prospective studies should establish a clear definition of ulcer healing, utilize a standardized wound classification system, and minimize patient heterogeneity. A combined assessment of microvascular and macrovascular perfusion status could improve the prediction of wound healing.
{"title":"Prognostic performance of bedside tests for predicting ulcer healing and wound healing after minor amputation in patients prone to medial arterial calcification: A systematic review.","authors":"Siem A Willems, Jelle A Nieuwstraten, Abbey Schepers, Jan van Schaik, Pim van den Hoven, Joost R van der Vorst, Jaap F Hamming, Jeroen Jwm Brouwers","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241309326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241309326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Foot ulceration is a significant and growing health problem worldwide, particularly due to rises in diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral artery disease. The prediction of ulcer healing remains a major challenge. In patients with foot ulcers, medial arterial calcification (MAC) can be present as a result of concomitant DM or chronic kidney disease and is a prognostic factor for unfavorable outcome. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the prognostic reliability of bedside tests to predict ulcer healing and wound healing after minor amputation in patients prone to MAC, following PRISMA guidelines. Primary endpoints were the positive and negative likelihood ratios for ulcer healing. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the QUIPS-tool. A total of 35 studies were included, predominantly investigating transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO<sub>2</sub>), followed by ankle-brachial index and toe pressure. None of these bedside tests effectively provided an acceptable trade-off between predicting healing and nonhealing. A TcPO<sub>2</sub> below 30 mmHg was most closely associated with nonhealing of an ulcer. The same applied to wound healing after minor amputation, in which none of the bedside tests was able to sufficiently predict healing or nonhealing. To conclude, currently used bedside tests lack acceptable prognostic performance for ulcer healing and healing after minor amputation in patients prone to MAC. Future prospective studies should establish a clear definition of ulcer healing, utilize a standardized wound classification system, and minimize patient heterogeneity. A combined assessment of microvascular and macrovascular perfusion status could improve the prediction of wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X241309326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143012705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}