Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-20DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_58_25
Murat Tuğrul Eren, Hakan Özveri
Objective: Urolithiasis is a multifactorial disease that causes symptomatology and needs to be managed depending on various clinical parameters. In this study, we aimed to investigate clinical factors for early operation in patients with uncomplicated symptomatic urolithiasis.
Materials and methods: Medical records of 148 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URS) within 6 weeks of diagnosis of urolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those operated early (≤3 days, n = 80) and those operated late (≥4 days, n = 68). Data, including age, sex, body mass index, degree of pain assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), radiological and laboratory examinations at the time of admission, along with perioperative surgical data, were recorded.
Results: 110 (74.3%) males and 38 (25.7%) females with a median age of 38 years were operated on for uncomplicated ureteral stones. Median time from diagnosis to ureteroscopic intervention was 3 days. Among clinical factors, only the number of readmissions to the emergency room, the mean white blood cell count, the level of microscopic hematuria, and VAS scores of pain at the initial diagnosis were significantly higher in the early operated group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Pain is a major clinical factor resulting in earlier URS in uncomplicated upper urinary tract stone disease. First admission to the emergency room due to renal colic with multiple readmissions after diagnosis, high level of microscopic hematuria, and white blood cell counts appear to be significant pain-related factors for earlier operation.
{"title":"Early or late intervention of upper urinary tract stone disease: What dictates it?","authors":"Murat Tuğrul Eren, Hakan Özveri","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_58_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_58_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Urolithiasis is a multifactorial disease that causes symptomatology and needs to be managed depending on various clinical parameters. In this study, we aimed to investigate clinical factors for early operation in patients with uncomplicated symptomatic urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medical records of 148 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URS) within 6 weeks of diagnosis of urolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those operated early (≤3 days, <i>n</i> = 80) and those operated late (≥4 days, <i>n</i> = 68). Data, including age, sex, body mass index, degree of pain assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), radiological and laboratory examinations at the time of admission, along with perioperative surgical data, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>110 (74.3%) males and 38 (25.7%) females with a median age of 38 years were operated on for uncomplicated ureteral stones. Median time from diagnosis to ureteroscopic intervention was 3 days. Among clinical factors, only the number of readmissions to the emergency room, the mean white blood cell count, the level of microscopic hematuria, and VAS scores of pain at the initial diagnosis were significantly higher in the early operated group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain is a major clinical factor resulting in earlier URS in uncomplicated upper urinary tract stone disease. First admission to the emergency room due to renal colic with multiple readmissions after diagnosis, high level of microscopic hematuria, and white blood cell counts appear to be significant pain-related factors for earlier operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"18 1","pages":"88-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12904502/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146202968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-20DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_65_25
Mohammed Salman Alkhaldi, Abdulrahman S Binsaleh, Ahmed O Alghamdi, Bandar Hather A Alharthy, Abdulaziz Nasser Alkudam, Faisal R Alanazi, Talal K Aldawsari, Mahmood Ahmad H Alqunais, Mohammed H Karrar Alsharif, Ali Hassan A Ali, Mosab A A Alzubier
Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent urological condition characterized by nonneoplastic enlargement of the prostate gland, leading to lower urinary tract symptoms such as nocturia, urine retention, and secondary urinary infections.
Methodology: This cross-sectional study evaluates BPH awareness, risk factors, and management among males ≥19 years in Riyadh, using a validated questionnaire (n = 398). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire distributed to 398 participants.
Results: The results reveal a significant lack of awareness, with 61.3% of participants showing poor knowledge about BPH, its symptoms, and available treatments. Notably, the internet and social media were the primary information sources, overshadowing healthcare providers. Despite the low awareness, 76.6% of participants expressed interest in learning more about BPH, highlighting an opportunity for targeted educational programs.
Conclusions: The study shows an urgent need for public health interventions to improve awareness, promote early detection, and address modifiable lifestyle risk factors to enhance the quality of life in affected populations. Targeted interventions leveraging social media and healthcare providers are urgently needed to address gaps in awareness and screening.
{"title":"Awareness of benign prostatic hyperplasia among males in the Riyadh region, KSA.","authors":"Mohammed Salman Alkhaldi, Abdulrahman S Binsaleh, Ahmed O Alghamdi, Bandar Hather A Alharthy, Abdulaziz Nasser Alkudam, Faisal R Alanazi, Talal K Aldawsari, Mahmood Ahmad H Alqunais, Mohammed H Karrar Alsharif, Ali Hassan A Ali, Mosab A A Alzubier","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_65_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_65_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent urological condition characterized by nonneoplastic enlargement of the prostate gland, leading to lower urinary tract symptoms such as nocturia, urine retention, and secondary urinary infections.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This cross-sectional study evaluates BPH awareness, risk factors, and management among males ≥19 years in Riyadh, using a validated questionnaire (<i>n</i> = 398). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire distributed to 398 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results reveal a significant lack of awareness, with 61.3% of participants showing poor knowledge about BPH, its symptoms, and available treatments. Notably, the internet and social media were the primary information sources, overshadowing healthcare providers. Despite the low awareness, 76.6% of participants expressed interest in learning more about BPH, highlighting an opportunity for targeted educational programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study shows an urgent need for public health interventions to improve awareness, promote early detection, and address modifiable lifestyle risk factors to enhance the quality of life in affected populations. Targeted interventions leveraging social media and healthcare providers are urgently needed to address gaps in awareness and screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"18 1","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12904515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146202899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-20DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_17_25
John Kim, Emily Zhang, Deron Britt, Jennifer Tang, Ibrahim Ebeido, Evan Fang, Amanda Paynter, Shahid Lambe
Introduction: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) remains the gold standard for living kidney donation. There is controversy over the optimal method for controlling the renal vessels. In this study, we assessed the outcomes of LDN and compared postoperative outcomes based on donor demographics and method of vascular control.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center review examining all adult patients who underwent LDN from 2017 to 2022. The outcomes collected included transfusion rate, estimated blood loss (EBL), reintervention rate, and overall 30-day complication rate. We also analyzed intra- and postoperative variables, including operative duration, conversion to open, method of vascular control, change in renal function, and length of stay.
Results: 168 patients were included, with the majority (81%) of patients undergoing left LDN. The median EBL was 100 mL (interquartile range 100-200 mL). Only two patients (1%) experienced hemorrhagic complications, though none was a result of clip or staple malfunction. The most common methods of arterial control were staples and clips (69%) and clips alone (28%), and the use of staples and clips was associated with longer operative duration. However, there were no significant differences in EBL, length of stay, or complication rate between groups. No patients required surgical reintervention for any reason, and there were no postoperative deaths.
Conclusion: At our center, LDN was associated with low rates of hemorrhagic complications. There was no association between the method used to control the renal artery and perioperative outcomes or complication rates. Our data suggest that LDN is a safe procedure with low complication rates.
{"title":"Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A single-center experience.","authors":"John Kim, Emily Zhang, Deron Britt, Jennifer Tang, Ibrahim Ebeido, Evan Fang, Amanda Paynter, Shahid Lambe","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_17_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_17_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) remains the gold standard for living kidney donation. There is controversy over the optimal method for controlling the renal vessels. In this study, we assessed the outcomes of LDN and compared postoperative outcomes based on donor demographics and method of vascular control.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single-center review examining all adult patients who underwent LDN from 2017 to 2022. The outcomes collected included transfusion rate, estimated blood loss (EBL), reintervention rate, and overall 30-day complication rate. We also analyzed intra- and postoperative variables, including operative duration, conversion to open, method of vascular control, change in renal function, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>168 patients were included, with the majority (81%) of patients undergoing left LDN. The median EBL was 100 mL (interquartile range 100-200 mL). Only two patients (1%) experienced hemorrhagic complications, though none was a result of clip or staple malfunction. The most common methods of arterial control were staples and clips (69%) and clips alone (28%), and the use of staples and clips was associated with longer operative duration. However, there were no significant differences in EBL, length of stay, or complication rate between groups. No patients required surgical reintervention for any reason, and there were no postoperative deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At our center, LDN was associated with low rates of hemorrhagic complications. There was no association between the method used to control the renal artery and perioperative outcomes or complication rates. Our data suggest that LDN is a safe procedure with low complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"18 1","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12904516/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146202982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_45_25
Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Arman Tsaturyan, Esteban Emiliani, Ali Talyshinskii, Bhaskar K Somani, Wissam Khalid Kamal, Christian Arvei Moen, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Lazaros Tzelves, Christian Beisland
Frailty refers to a state of increased vulnerability and is recognised to be multifactorial. It is associated with a higher likelihood for functional dependency and a reduced life expectancy. In the surgical setting, frailty has attracted increased attention in regard to how it can impact post-operative outcomes. Many research groups have explored ways to translate frailty into a clinical marker and represent it as a quantifiable measurement. To this end, there now exist a plethora of tools (over 50 tools) available that have been applied in a clinical and/or research setting across nearly all medical and surgical specialities. However, the large number of tools can make it challenging for clinicians to know which one to adopt. This article provides an overview of the commonly used tools in urological surgery. Most tools have been studied in the context of urological cancer surgery and consistently show that frailty is associated with poorer outcomes. Of note, none of the systems described were developed exclusively for purely urological studies. Many of the abovementioned systems require a face-to-face assessment and therefore preclude retrospective data collection. Frail patients may not therefore be eligible on account of either one of these and it may account for why research in this field is lacking. Important outcomes such as the discharge location and how ADLs have changed are also challenging to collect retrospectively. Further research should focus on developing a frailty scoring system that is customised for urological surgeries.
{"title":"Frailty scoring systems in urological surgery: Current status and future perspectives.","authors":"Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Arman Tsaturyan, Esteban Emiliani, Ali Talyshinskii, Bhaskar K Somani, Wissam Khalid Kamal, Christian Arvei Moen, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Lazaros Tzelves, Christian Beisland","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_45_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_45_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frailty refers to a state of increased vulnerability and is recognised to be multifactorial. It is associated with a higher likelihood for functional dependency and a reduced life expectancy. In the surgical setting, frailty has attracted increased attention in regard to how it can impact post-operative outcomes. Many research groups have explored ways to translate frailty into a clinical marker and represent it as a quantifiable measurement. To this end, there now exist a plethora of tools (over 50 tools) available that have been applied in a clinical and/or research setting across nearly all medical and surgical specialities. However, the large number of tools can make it challenging for clinicians to know which one to adopt. This article provides an overview of the commonly used tools in urological surgery. Most tools have been studied in the context of urological cancer surgery and consistently show that frailty is associated with poorer outcomes. Of note, none of the systems described were developed exclusively for purely urological studies. Many of the abovementioned systems require a face-to-face assessment and therefore preclude retrospective data collection. Frail patients may not therefore be eligible on account of either one of these and it may account for why research in this field is lacking. Important outcomes such as the discharge location and how ADLs have changed are also challenging to collect retrospectively. Further research should focus on developing a frailty scoring system that is customised for urological surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 4","pages":"218-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_49_25
Amr Makia, Salma Khalifa, Bhaskar K Somani
The role of telemedicine (TM) in endourology has expanded significantly over the past decade, demonstrating benefits for both patient satisfaction and healthcare efficiency. We wanted to look at the role and effectiveness of using these technological innovations in endourology. A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework and Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome statement. Search was done for all English language articles, over several databases, from inception to Aug 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on studies involving patients with kidney stone disease and reporting outcomes related to healthcare delivery, cost savings, and environmental sustainability (green credentials). A total of 933 articles were initially identified and after screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, 10 articles were finally included. Of these articles, 8 showed a cost-saving and 9 showed a greener credential of using TM. All included studies showed a positive impact of TM in terms of reduced time to access urology services, enhanced acute and follow-up efficiency, time to decision-making or treatment, patient satisfaction, and safety. Most studies showed more than one clinical and/or organizational benefit in the patient pathway. Our review shows that TM in endourology demonstrates multiple benefits, including cost savings, environmental sustainability, and improved healthcare delivery. The included studies highlight enhanced access to services, faster decision-making, and high patient satisfaction and safety. Given the pressures on the National Health Service and existing waiting times, more should be done to adapt and adopt this technological revolution.
{"title":"Role, effectiveness, cost efficiency, sustainability, and outcomes of using telemedicine in endourology: A systematic review of literature.","authors":"Amr Makia, Salma Khalifa, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_49_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_49_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of telemedicine (TM) in endourology has expanded significantly over the past decade, demonstrating benefits for both patient satisfaction and healthcare efficiency. We wanted to look at the role and effectiveness of using these technological innovations in endourology. A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework and Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome statement. Search was done for all English language articles, over several databases, from inception to Aug 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on studies involving patients with kidney stone disease and reporting outcomes related to healthcare delivery, cost savings, and environmental sustainability (green credentials). A total of 933 articles were initially identified and after screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, 10 articles were finally included. Of these articles, 8 showed a cost-saving and 9 showed a greener credential of using TM. All included studies showed a positive impact of TM in terms of reduced time to access urology services, enhanced acute and follow-up efficiency, time to decision-making or treatment, patient satisfaction, and safety. Most studies showed more than one clinical and/or organizational benefit in the patient pathway. Our review shows that TM in endourology demonstrates multiple benefits, including cost savings, environmental sustainability, and improved healthcare delivery. The included studies highlight enhanced access to services, faster decision-making, and high patient satisfaction and safety. Given the pressures on the National Health Service and existing waiting times, more should be done to adapt and adopt this technological revolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 4","pages":"210-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604724/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_41_25
Alberto Olivero, Sinan Khadhouri, Erika Palagonia, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Stefano Tappero, Barend Dreyer, Aldo Massimo Bocciardi, Alberto Caviglia, Antonio Galfano, Feras Al Jaafari, Bhaskar K Somani, Amelia Pietropaolo, Silvia Secco
Background: Minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs) are many promising approaches for the management of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) that might be performed under local anesthesia (LA) and have same-day discharge. To address the feasibility and efficacy of LA for BPH-MIST, a specific trifecta was conceptualized and tested: (1) no intraoperative complications, (2) reduced intraoperative pain, and (3) same-day discharge.
Materials and methods: We prospectively collected data from patients who underwent Rezum, Urolift, and iTIND treatments from January 01, 2023, to February 28, 2024, on an international database. All the patients received a local administration of two anesthetic gels in the urethra before the procedure; selected patients, in addition, received a transperineal anesthetic injection in the periprostatic space or transurethrally with a Schelin Catheter (SC) injection directly in the prostatic lobes. Reduced intraoperative pain was defined as <5 on the visual analogue scale (VAS range: 0-10).
Results: Overall, 156 patients were included in the study. Median age was 63.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 56-70) years. Eleven patients (7.0%) had diabetes, and 29 (18.6%) received anticoagulant medication. Ten patients (6.4%) had indwelling catheters. The median prostate size was 45 ml (IQR: 34-60). Forty-eight patients underwent Urolift (30.8%), 70 (44.8%) Rezum, and 38 (24.4%) iTIND. The transperineal block and the SC were used in 21 patients (13.5%) and 32 (20.5%) patients, respectively, with 103 (66%) patients receiving only the anesthetic gels in the urethra. Performing MIST in pure LA achieved the trifecta outcome in 122 patients (78.2%). Six patients (3.8%) had intraoperative complications. One hundred and thirty patients (83.3%) experienced reduced intraoperative pain (<5 on VAS). One hundred and 47 (94.2%) patients were discharged on the same day of the procedure.
Conclusions: LA for MIST in BPH is feasible, with excellent success rates and reduced pain, as trifecta outcomes were achieved.
背景:微创手术治疗(mist)是治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的许多有前途的方法,可以在局部麻醉(LA)下进行,当天出院。为了解决LA治疗BPH-MIST的可行性和有效性,我们构想并测试了一个特定的三合一方案:(1)无术中并发症,(2)减少术中疼痛,(3)当日出院。材料和方法:我们在一个国际数据库中前瞻性地收集了2023年1月1日至2024年2月28日期间接受Rezum、Urolift和iTIND治疗的患者的数据。所有患者术前均在尿道局部给予两种麻醉凝胶;此外,选定的患者在前列腺周围间隙接受经会阴麻醉注射或经尿道直接在前列腺叶注射谢林导管(SC)。术中疼痛减轻定义为:结果:总共有156例患者纳入研究。中位年龄为63.5岁(四分位数间距[IQR]: 56-70)。11例(7.0%)患者患有糖尿病,29例(18.6%)患者接受了抗凝药物治疗。留置导尿管10例(6.4%)。前列腺大小中位数为45 ml (IQR: 34-60)。48例患者行Urolift(30.8%), 70例(44.8%)行Rezum, 38例(24.4%)行iTIND。经会阴阻滞和SC分别用于21例(13.5%)和32例(20.5%),103例(66%)患者仅在尿道内使用麻醉凝胶。122例(78.2%)患者在纯LA中使用MIST达到了三合一的效果。6例(3.8%)患者出现术中并发症。130例(83.3%)患者术中疼痛减轻(结论:BPH的MIST LA是可行的,具有出色的成功率和减轻疼痛,达到了三合一的结果。
{"title":"Trifecta outcomes to assess the feasibility of local anesthesia for benign prostate hyperplasia minimally invasive surgical treatments.","authors":"Alberto Olivero, Sinan Khadhouri, Erika Palagonia, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Stefano Tappero, Barend Dreyer, Aldo Massimo Bocciardi, Alberto Caviglia, Antonio Galfano, Feras Al Jaafari, Bhaskar K Somani, Amelia Pietropaolo, Silvia Secco","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_41_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_41_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs) are many promising approaches for the management of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) that might be performed under local anesthesia (LA) and have same-day discharge. To address the feasibility and efficacy of LA for BPH-MIST, a specific trifecta was conceptualized and tested: (1) no intraoperative complications, (2) reduced intraoperative pain, and (3) same-day discharge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We prospectively collected data from patients who underwent Rezum, Urolift, and iTIND treatments from January 01, 2023, to February 28, 2024, on an international database. All the patients received a local administration of two anesthetic gels in the urethra before the procedure; selected patients, in addition, received a transperineal anesthetic injection in the periprostatic space or transurethrally with a Schelin Catheter (SC) injection directly in the prostatic lobes. Reduced intraoperative pain was defined as <5 on the visual analogue scale (VAS range: 0-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 156 patients were included in the study. Median age was 63.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 56-70) years. Eleven patients (7.0%) had diabetes, and 29 (18.6%) received anticoagulant medication. Ten patients (6.4%) had indwelling catheters. The median prostate size was 45 ml (IQR: 34-60). Forty-eight patients underwent Urolift (30.8%), 70 (44.8%) Rezum, and 38 (24.4%) iTIND. The transperineal block and the SC were used in 21 patients (13.5%) and 32 (20.5%) patients, respectively, with 103 (66%) patients receiving only the anesthetic gels in the urethra. Performing MIST in pure LA achieved the trifecta outcome in 122 patients (78.2%). Six patients (3.8%) had intraoperative complications. One hundred and thirty patients (83.3%) experienced reduced intraoperative pain (<5 on VAS). One hundred and 47 (94.2%) patients were discharged on the same day of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA for MIST in BPH is feasible, with excellent success rates and reduced pain, as trifecta outcomes were achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 4","pages":"233-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_92_25
Amr H Abou Faddan, Mohamed Abdelghany, Adel Kurkar, Ahmed M Moeen, Mohammed A Gadalla
Background and objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard technique used for the treatment of large renal stones ≥ 2 cm. However, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the effect of PCNL remains underreported. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after PCNL in patients with stage 2-4 CKD.
Subjects and methods: This prospective study included patients with stage 2-4 CKD who underwent PCNL in the period from December 2020 to December 2023. eGFR was measured using the Cockroft-Gault formula preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Patients were classified as either improved/stable or deteriorated. Perioperative complications and stone-free rate (SFR) were also evaluated.
Results: The study included 50 patients (male/female = 33/17) with CKD who underwent PCNL. The mean operative time was 84.8 ± 27.4 min. A total number of 49 complications were reported in 21 patients. At a follow-up of 3 months, eGFR was improved/stable in 40 (80%) patients, and it deteriorated in 10 (20%) patients. The SFR was 76% at 3 months postoperatively. Factors that significantly affected the eGFR were bleeding, access number, incidence of perioperative complications, stone burden, and operative time.
Conclusions: PCNL is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with stage 2-4 CKD with renal stones ≥2 cm. It is advisable to avoid long operative time, excessive bleeding, and multiple accesses as possible in these patients to minimize the risk of renal function deterioration.
{"title":"Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with stage 2-4 chronic kidney disease.","authors":"Amr H Abou Faddan, Mohamed Abdelghany, Adel Kurkar, Ahmed M Moeen, Mohammed A Gadalla","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_92_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_92_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard technique used for the treatment of large renal stones ≥ 2 cm. However, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the effect of PCNL remains underreported. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after PCNL in patients with stage 2-4 CKD.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This prospective study included patients with stage 2-4 CKD who underwent PCNL in the period from December 2020 to December 2023. eGFR was measured using the Cockroft-Gault formula preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Patients were classified as either improved/stable or deteriorated. Perioperative complications and stone-free rate (SFR) were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 50 patients (male/female = 33/17) with CKD who underwent PCNL. The mean operative time was 84.8 ± 27.4 min. A total number of 49 complications were reported in 21 patients. At a follow-up of 3 months, eGFR was improved/stable in 40 (80%) patients, and it deteriorated in 10 (20%) patients. The SFR was 76% at 3 months postoperatively. Factors that significantly affected the eGFR were bleeding, access number, incidence of perioperative complications, stone burden, and operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCNL is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with stage 2-4 CKD with renal stones ≥2 cm. It is advisable to avoid long operative time, excessive bleeding, and multiple accesses as possible in these patients to minimize the risk of renal function deterioration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 4","pages":"250-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604704/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_31_25
Leo Edward Fitzgerald Gradwell, Khalid Fouda Neel, Abdullah Khalid Fouda Neel, Bhaskar K Somani
Posterior urethral valves (PUVs) are a common cause of congenital bladder outlet obstruction and obstructive uropathy in male infants and are a leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD)/end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in the pediatric population. Despite this, it remains challenging to predict which patients will go on to develop CKD/ESRF, and thus management and follow-up are left to the discretion of the treating department. Many different methods have been proposed to predict outcomes in these patients and several tools, including predictive scores and models, have been published. Here, we provide an up-to-date summary of the tools currently published. A comprehensive search of literature available on MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed to identify scoring systems, predictive models, and predictive tools relating to progression to CKD/ESRF/bladder dysfunction in patients with PUVs. Six predictive tools were identified and so were included in the analysis. Three are based on clinical/biochemical findings, 2 utilize machine learning/artificial intelligence, and one is purely based on radiological findings. Three out of 6 have undergone some form of external validation. Four provide a numerical risk and 2 stratify patients into risk categories. There are currently 6 predictive tools that have been published that quantify the risk of developing long-term complications associated with PUVs. Further validation is required to establish these scores/predictive models as a clinical standard of care.
{"title":"Atlas of predictive tools and scoring systems for outcomes in patients with posterior urethral valves: A comprehensive review of the literature.","authors":"Leo Edward Fitzgerald Gradwell, Khalid Fouda Neel, Abdullah Khalid Fouda Neel, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_31_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_31_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Posterior urethral valves (PUVs) are a common cause of congenital bladder outlet obstruction and obstructive uropathy in male infants and are a leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD)/end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in the pediatric population. Despite this, it remains challenging to predict which patients will go on to develop CKD/ESRF, and thus management and follow-up are left to the discretion of the treating department. Many different methods have been proposed to predict outcomes in these patients and several tools, including predictive scores and models, have been published. Here, we provide an up-to-date summary of the tools currently published. A comprehensive search of literature available on MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed to identify scoring systems, predictive models, and predictive tools relating to progression to CKD/ESRF/bladder dysfunction in patients with PUVs. Six predictive tools were identified and so were included in the analysis. Three are based on clinical/biochemical findings, 2 utilize machine learning/artificial intelligence, and one is purely based on radiological findings. Three out of 6 have undergone some form of external validation. Four provide a numerical risk and 2 stratify patients into risk categories. There are currently 6 predictive tools that have been published that quantify the risk of developing long-term complications associated with PUVs. Further validation is required to establish these scores/predictive models as a clinical standard of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 4","pages":"223-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-17DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_82_25
Matthias Stach, Philipp Baumeister, Luca Afferi, Bhaskar K Somani, Julian Cornelius, Agostino Mattei, Nico Christian Grossmann, Christoph M Würnschimmel
Introduction: Although the usage rates of ureterorenoscopy (URS) for treatment of urolithiasis have increased, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) remains a widely employed primary treatment option due to its less invasive character. However, in cases of primary ESWL failure, the optimal choice of secondary treatment, whether secondary ESWL (sESWL) or secondary URS (sURS) in terms of safety and efficacy, remains uncertain.
Patients and methods: A total of 62 urolithiasis patients who underwent sESWL (n = 31) or sURS (n = 31) at a single tertiary referral center between March 2014 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Key outcome parameters included tertiary reintervention rates, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on stone localization (kidney versus ureter) and stone size (<10 mm versus >10 mm).
Results: Tertiary reintervention rates were significantly higher in the sESWL group (42%) compared to the sURS group (16%, P = 0.05). Stone-free rates at 6 weeks were lower in the sESWL group (29%) compared to the sURS group (84%, P < 0.01). Complication rates were 13% (4/31) in the sESWL group versus 6% (2/31) in the sURS group (P = 0.06).
Conclusion: sESWL is associated with a significantly higher rate of tertiary reintervention compared to sURS. However, in terms of safety, no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the two modalities were observed, and choice of tertiary treatment may therefore be made on individual discussion with the patients.
{"title":"The natural history of failed shock wave lithotripsy: Redo-shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy - A single-center comparative study in a university teaching hospital setting.","authors":"Matthias Stach, Philipp Baumeister, Luca Afferi, Bhaskar K Somani, Julian Cornelius, Agostino Mattei, Nico Christian Grossmann, Christoph M Würnschimmel","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_82_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_82_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the usage rates of ureterorenoscopy (URS) for treatment of urolithiasis have increased, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) remains a widely employed primary treatment option due to its less invasive character. However, in cases of primary ESWL failure, the optimal choice of secondary treatment, whether secondary ESWL (sESWL) or secondary URS (sURS) in terms of safety and efficacy, remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 62 urolithiasis patients who underwent sESWL (<i>n</i> = 31) or sURS (<i>n</i> = 31) at a single tertiary referral center between March 2014 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Key outcome parameters included tertiary reintervention rates, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on stone localization (kidney versus ureter) and stone size (<10 mm versus >10 mm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tertiary reintervention rates were significantly higher in the sESWL group (42%) compared to the sURS group (16%, <i>P</i> = 0.05). Stone-free rates at 6 weeks were lower in the sESWL group (29%) compared to the sURS group (84%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Complication rates were 13% (4/31) in the sESWL group versus 6% (2/31) in the sURS group (<i>P</i> = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>sESWL is associated with a significantly higher rate of tertiary reintervention compared to sURS. However, in terms of safety, no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the two modalities were observed, and choice of tertiary treatment may therefore be made on individual discussion with the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 4","pages":"257-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604725/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}