首页 > 最新文献

Urology Annals最新文献

英文 中文
Circulating microRNAs as biomarker in prostate cancer and their significance in the differentiation of benign and malignant conditions of the prostate. 循环microrna作为前列腺癌的生物标志物及其在前列腺良恶性分化中的意义
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_11_25
Kowsalya Ramprasad, Madhura Navule Siddappa, Manohar Chikkamoga Siddaiah, Manju Moorthy, Gopalakrishna Ramaswamy

Background: Prostate cancer is among the most commonly diagnosed cancers in males worldwide. While Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains the front-line screening marker, it lacks sufficient diagnostic accuracy.

Aims and objectives: So, in the quest for improved biomarkers, the expression profiles of circulating miRNAs have become increasingly significant. Hence, this study was undertaken to identify the miRNA profile unique to prostate cancer.

Materials and methods: Using NanoString Human MicroRNA Arrays, we analyzed serum samples from three groups: patients with localized prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Results: Our analysis revealed distinct circulating miRNA expression patterns in prostate cancer patients compared to those with benign conditions. Specifically, miR-1272 and miR-1247-5p were significantly up-regulated (log2FC > 1, p < 0.05), whereas miR-337-3p, miR-191-5p, and let-7a-5p were significantly down-regulated (log2FC < -1, p < 0.05) in prostate cancer versus BPH. Additionally, when comparing localized and metastatic prostate cancer, hsa-miR-302d-3p and hsa-miR-1246 were notably up-regulated (log2FC > 3, P < 0.05). These specific miRNAs show potential for facilitating early diagnosis, enhancing risk stratification, and serving as non-invasive biomarkers for monitoring disease progression, thereby helping to reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that circulating miRNAs could serve as minimally invasive biomarkers in prostatic cancer with a higher specificity and sensitivity, making them more effective at distinguishing between cancerous and benign conditions. However, despite their promise, miRNA testing remains costly, technically complex, and not yet standardized for routine clinical use. Therefore, further validation in larger, independent cohorts is essential to confirm the diagnostic and prognostic utility of the miRNAs identified in this study.

背景:前列腺癌是世界范围内男性最常见的癌症之一。虽然前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)仍然是一线筛查标志物,但它缺乏足够的诊断准确性。目的和目的:因此,在寻找改进的生物标志物的过程中,循环mirna的表达谱变得越来越重要。因此,本研究旨在确定前列腺癌特有的miRNA谱。材料和方法:我们使用纳米串人类MicroRNA阵列分析了三组患者的血清样本:局限性前列腺癌、转移性前列腺癌和良性前列腺增生。结果:我们的分析揭示了前列腺癌患者与良性前列腺癌患者不同的循环miRNA表达模式。具体来说,miR-1272和miR-1247-5p在前列腺癌和前列腺增生中显著上调(log2FC bbb1, p < 0.05),而miR-337-3p、miR-191-5p和let-7a-5p在前列腺癌和前列腺增生中显著下调(log2FC < -1, p < 0.05)。此外,在比较局限性和转移性前列腺癌时,hsa-miR-302d-3p和hsa-miR-1246显著上调(log2FC > 3, P < 0.05)。这些特异性mirna显示出促进早期诊断、加强风险分层和作为监测疾病进展的非侵入性生物标志物的潜力,从而有助于减少不必要的活组织检查。结论:我们的研究结果表明,循环mirna可以作为前列腺癌的微创生物标志物,具有更高的特异性和敏感性,使其更有效地区分癌性和良性状况。然而,尽管前景光明,miRNA检测仍然昂贵,技术复杂,并且尚未标准化用于常规临床应用。因此,在更大的独立队列中进行进一步验证对于确认本研究中鉴定的mirna的诊断和预后效用至关重要。
{"title":"Circulating microRNAs as biomarker in prostate cancer and their significance in the differentiation of benign and malignant conditions of the prostate.","authors":"Kowsalya Ramprasad, Madhura Navule Siddappa, Manohar Chikkamoga Siddaiah, Manju Moorthy, Gopalakrishna Ramaswamy","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_11_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_11_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer is among the most commonly diagnosed cancers in males worldwide. While Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains the front-line screening marker, it lacks sufficient diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>So, in the quest for improved biomarkers, the expression profiles of circulating miRNAs have become increasingly significant. Hence, this study was undertaken to identify the miRNA profile unique to prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using NanoString Human MicroRNA Arrays, we analyzed serum samples from three groups: patients with localized prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, and benign prostatic hyperplasia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed distinct circulating miRNA expression patterns in prostate cancer patients compared to those with benign conditions. Specifically, miR-1272 and miR-1247-5p were significantly up-regulated (log2FC > 1, p < 0.05), whereas miR-337-3p, miR-191-5p, and let-7a-5p were significantly down-regulated (log2FC < -1, p < 0.05) in prostate cancer versus BPH. Additionally, when comparing localized and metastatic prostate cancer, hsa-miR-302d-3p and hsa-miR-1246 were notably up-regulated (log2FC > 3, <i>P</i> < 0.05). These specific miRNAs show potential for facilitating early diagnosis, enhancing risk stratification, and serving as non-invasive biomarkers for monitoring disease progression, thereby helping to reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that circulating miRNAs could serve as minimally invasive biomarkers in prostatic cancer with a higher specificity and sensitivity, making them more effective at distinguishing between cancerous and benign conditions. However, despite their promise, miRNA testing remains costly, technically complex, and not yet standardized for routine clinical use. Therefore, further validation in larger, independent cohorts is essential to confirm the diagnostic and prognostic utility of the miRNAs identified in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 3","pages":"192-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366852/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simplified technique of patient positioning and renal access in true supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. 真正仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术中病人定位及肾脏通路的简化技术。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_103_24
Vimal Kumar Dixit, Apurva Gupta, Vivek Kumar Vijjan, Kamal Sharma, Amitav Kumar, Saurabh Pruthi, Yashendra Sethi

Objectives: To evaluate a novel, simplified technique for TRUE supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) that omits the use of bolsters or stirrups, utilizing a novel anatomical landmark ("Dixit line") for initial puncture. The outcomes of this technique are compared with those of the traditional supine PCNL approach.

Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 400 patients who underwent supine PCNL for renal or upper ureteric stones between January 2020 and January 2024. All procedures were performed by a single urologist at a tertiary care center. Patients were divided into two groups: One treated with the novel technique and the other with the traditional technique. Data on demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results: The novel technique group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (53 ± 10 min vs. 70 ± 15 min, P < 0.01), demonstrating enhanced procedural efficiency. Demographic and stone characteristics, as well as most intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, showed no significant differences between the two groups. However, the novel technique group exhibited a trend toward quicker discharge times (1.8 ± 0.5 days vs. 2.1 ± 0.7 days, P = 0.05).

Conclusions: The novel TRUE supine PCNL technique, which excludes bolsters or stirrups and uses the "Dixit line" for initial puncture may serve as an effective alternative to traditional methods, improving efficiency while maintaining safety.

目的:评估一种新的、简化的TRUE仰卧经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)技术,该技术不使用支撑或马镫,利用一种新的解剖标志(“Dixit线”)进行初始穿刺。将该方法与传统仰卧位PCNL方法的结果进行了比较。材料与方法:对2020年1月至2024年1月400例因肾结石或输尿管上段结石行仰卧PCNL的患者进行回顾性观察研究。所有手术均由三级护理中心的一名泌尿科医生完成。患者分为两组:一组采用新技术治疗,另一组采用传统技术治疗。收集和分析人口统计学、结石特征、术中变量和术后结果的数据。结果:新技术组手术时间明显缩短(53±10 min vs 70±15 min, P < 0.01),手术效率明显提高。人口统计学和结石特征,以及大多数术中和术后结果,两组之间没有显着差异。而新技术组放电时间明显缩短(1.8±0.5 d vs 2.1±0.7 d, P = 0.05)。结论:新型TRUE仰卧PCNL技术,不使用支撑或马镫,使用“Dixit线”进行初始穿刺,可作为传统方法的有效替代方法,在保持安全性的同时提高效率。
{"title":"Simplified technique of patient positioning and renal access in true supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Vimal Kumar Dixit, Apurva Gupta, Vivek Kumar Vijjan, Kamal Sharma, Amitav Kumar, Saurabh Pruthi, Yashendra Sethi","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_103_24","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_103_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate a novel, simplified technique for TRUE supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) that omits the use of bolsters or stirrups, utilizing a novel anatomical landmark (\"Dixit line\") for initial puncture. The outcomes of this technique are compared with those of the traditional supine PCNL approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on 400 patients who underwent supine PCNL for renal or upper ureteric stones between January 2020 and January 2024. All procedures were performed by a single urologist at a tertiary care center. Patients were divided into two groups: One treated with the novel technique and the other with the traditional technique. Data on demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The novel technique group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (53 ± 10 min vs. 70 ± 15 min, <i>P</i> < 0.01), demonstrating enhanced procedural efficiency. Demographic and stone characteristics, as well as most intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, showed no significant differences between the two groups. However, the novel technique group exhibited a trend toward quicker discharge times (1.8 ± 0.5 days vs. 2.1 ± 0.7 days, <i>P</i> = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel TRUE supine PCNL technique, which excludes bolsters or stirrups and uses the \"Dixit line\" for initial puncture may serve as an effective alternative to traditional methods, improving efficiency while maintaining safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 3","pages":"149-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366849/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum: Type II diabetes miletus: Does it increase the chance to fail the first trail of void following transurethral resection of prostate (TURP)? 2型糖尿病:是否会增加经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后第一次尿路检查失败的机会?
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_106_25

[This corrects the article on p. 92 in vol. 17, PMID: 40352087.].

[这更正了第17卷第92页的文章,PMID: 40352087]。
{"title":"Erratum: Type II diabetes miletus: Does it increase the chance to fail the first trail of void following transurethral resection of prostate (TURP)?","authors":"","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_106_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_106_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article on p. 92 in vol. 17, PMID: 40352087.].</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 3","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366845/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of outcome of dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft and vaginal wall graft for female urethral stricture. 女性尿道狭窄采用颊黏膜移植与阴道壁移植的背侧尿道成形术疗效分析。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_121_24
Gaurav Babelay, Ahsan Ahmad, Nikhil Ranjan, Kumar Dheeraj

Background: It was estimated that 3%-8% of women presented with bladder obstruction, and 4%-13% of these women had female urethral stricture (FUS), which is an uncommon disorder.

Aims: The study has been conducted to analyze the outcome of Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft (BMG) and vaginal wall graft (VWG) for FUS.

Settings and design: It was a retrospective, single-centric cohort study. The study has been conducted for 2 years and 2 months, i.e., from July 2021 to September 2023.

Subjects and methods: The study included 20 female patients with urethral stricture who had urethroplasty. The participants were further classified into two groups respectively. One of the groups included 10 participants with cases of BMG urethroplasty and another 10 were cases of VWG urethroplasty.

Statistical analysis: The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 program was used to analyze the data. Both continuous and categorical variables were present in the data. Descriptive Statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or n (%) or n.

Results: The BMG group had a substantially lower postvoid residual (PVR) of 10 ± 4.2 mL than the VWG group, which had a PVR of 15 ± 6.4 mL with a P = 0.04. The operating time was 110 ± 10.8 in the BMG urethroplasty group and 90 ± 8.2 in the VWG group with a P < 0.001. VWG urethroplasty group. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of AUA symptom score and Qmax.

Conclusion: The study concluded that FUS reconstruction can offer a good, long-lasting response. Moreover, between both the preferred techniques of BMG and VWG urethroplasty, which is safe and effective, patients with postmenopausal atrophy or vaginal pathology may benefit more from BMG.

背景:据估计,3%-8%的女性表现为膀胱梗阻,其中4%-13%的女性表现为女性尿道狭窄(FUS),这是一种罕见的疾病。目的:本研究分析了颊粘膜移植物(BMG)和阴道壁移植物(VWG)用于治疗FUS的背侧尿道成形术的效果。背景和设计:这是一项回顾性、单中心队列研究。研究时间为2年零2个月,即从2021年7月至2023年9月。对象和方法:研究对象为20例行尿道成形术的女性尿道狭窄患者。参与者被进一步分为两组。其中一组包括10例BMG尿道成形术患者,另10例VWG尿道成形术患者。统计分析:使用SPSS (Statistical Package for The Social Sciences)第24版程序对数据进行分析。数据中存在连续变量和分类变量。描述性统计以均数±标准差或n(%)或n表示。结果:BMG组空隙后残留(PVR)为10±4.2 mL,明显低于VWG组的15±6.4 mL, P = 0.04。BMG组手术时间为110±10.8,VWG组为90±8.2,P < 0.001。VWG尿道成形术组。两组在AUA症状评分和Qmax方面无统计学差异。结论:研究表明,FUS重建可以提供良好、持久的疗效。此外,在BMG和VWG这两种安全有效的首选技术之间,绝经后萎缩或阴道病变的患者可能从BMG中获益更多。
{"title":"Analysis of outcome of dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft and vaginal wall graft for female urethral stricture.","authors":"Gaurav Babelay, Ahsan Ahmad, Nikhil Ranjan, Kumar Dheeraj","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_121_24","DOIUrl":"10.4103/ua.ua_121_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It was estimated that 3%-8% of women presented with bladder obstruction, and 4%-13% of these women had female urethral stricture (FUS), which is an uncommon disorder.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study has been conducted to analyze the outcome of Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft (BMG) and vaginal wall graft (VWG) for FUS.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>It was a retrospective, single-centric cohort study. The study has been conducted for 2 years and 2 months, i.e., from July 2021 to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>The study included 20 female patients with urethral stricture who had urethroplasty. The participants were further classified into two groups respectively. One of the groups included 10 participants with cases of BMG urethroplasty and another 10 were cases of VWG urethroplasty.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 program was used to analyze the data. Both continuous and categorical variables were present in the data. Descriptive Statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or <i>n</i> (%) or <i>n</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BMG group had a substantially lower postvoid residual (PVR) of 10 ± 4.2 mL than the VWG group, which had a PVR of 15 ± 6.4 mL with a <i>P</i> = 0.04. The operating time was 110 ± 10.8 in the BMG urethroplasty group and 90 ± 8.2 in the VWG group with a <i>P</i> < 0.001. VWG urethroplasty group. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of AUA symptom score and Q<sub>max</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that FUS reconstruction can offer a good, long-lasting response. Moreover, between both the preferred techniques of BMG and VWG urethroplasty, which is safe and effective, patients with postmenopausal atrophy or vaginal pathology may benefit more from BMG.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 3","pages":"156-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366848/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of pulse modulation settings for optimal pop-dusting efficiency using the Quanta Litho 150 laser: An in vitro study. 利用Quanta Litho 150激光器评估脉冲调制设置的最佳喷射效率:一项体外研究。
IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_6_25
Victor Sandoval, Stephen Hassig, Mitchell Hoestermann, Connor Bittlingmaier, Regan Merkin, George K Siodis, Thomas Osinski, Nitin Sharma, Rajat Kumar Jain, Scott Quarrier

Purpose: The novel Quanta Litho 150 W (Samarate, Italy) was recently introduced and incorporates new pulsed modulation settings. We sought to analyze ablation rate and efficiency in short pulse (SP), virtual basket (VB), and vapor tunnel (VT) pulsed modulations, in an in vitro pop-dusting simulation across different settings at a fixed power of 30 Watts (W) and fixed periods of time.

Materials and methods: Seven millimeter BegoStone phantoms were subjected to lithotripsy in a simulated calyx using Holmium: yttrium:aluminum garnet Quanta System 150 W. 30 W was applied at different settings across three pulse modulation modes: SP, VB, and VT. Ablation rate and efficiency were and compared between the three groups.

Results: Maximum ablation efficiency for the VB and VT groups was achieved at VB 2J x 15 Hz and VT at 2.5 J x 12 Hz. Ablation efficiency decreased with higher Joules. VB at 1.5 J x 20 Hz and SP at 2.5 J x 12 Hz were the only settings to obtain 85% ablation at 5 min.

Conclusions: In vitro laser lithotripsy using a BegoStone phantom, VB at 2J x15 Hz and VT at 2.5 J x 12 Hz were the most efficient setting for pop-dusting with the Quanta Litho 150. The highest efficiency (mg/min) was achieved with VB at 2 J x 15 Hz and VT at 2.5 J x 12 Hz at 1:15 min.

目的:新型Quanta Litho 150w (Samarate, Italy)最近推出,并采用了新的脉冲调制设置。我们试图分析短脉冲(SP)、虚拟篮子(VB)和蒸汽隧道(VT)脉冲调制下的消融速率和效率,在不同设置下的体外爆破除尘模拟中,在固定功率为30瓦(W)和固定时间下。材料和方法:采用Holmium:钇:铝石榴石Quanta System 150 W.在三种脉冲调制模式(SP、VB和VT)下的不同设置下应用30w,对7毫米BegoStone模型在模拟花萼中进行碎石。比较三组之间的烧蚀率和效率。结果:VB组和VT组的消融效率在VB 2J × 15hz和VT 2.5 J × 12hz时达到最大。焦耳越高,烧蚀效率越低。1.5 J × 20 Hz的VB和2.5 J × 12 Hz的SP是在5分钟内获得85%消融的唯一设置。结论:使用BegoStone幻影进行体外激光碎石,2J × 15 Hz的VB和2.5 J × 12 Hz的VT是使用Quanta Litho 150进行爆破除尘的最有效设置。以2 J × 15 Hz的VB和2.5 J × 12 Hz的VT在1:15 min时达到最高效率(mg/min)。
{"title":"Evaluation of pulse modulation settings for optimal pop-dusting efficiency using the Quanta Litho 150 laser: An <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Victor Sandoval, Stephen Hassig, Mitchell Hoestermann, Connor Bittlingmaier, Regan Merkin, George K Siodis, Thomas Osinski, Nitin Sharma, Rajat Kumar Jain, Scott Quarrier","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_6_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_6_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The novel Quanta Litho 150 W (Samarate, Italy) was recently introduced and incorporates new pulsed modulation settings. We sought to analyze ablation rate and efficiency in short pulse (SP), virtual basket (VB), and vapor tunnel (VT) pulsed modulations, in an <i>in vitro</i> pop-dusting simulation across different settings at a fixed power of 30 Watts (W) and fixed periods of time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seven millimeter BegoStone phantoms were subjected to lithotripsy in a simulated calyx using Holmium: yttrium:aluminum garnet Quanta System 150 W. 30 W was applied at different settings across three pulse modulation modes: SP, VB, and VT. Ablation rate and efficiency were and compared between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum ablation efficiency for the VB and VT groups was achieved at VB 2J x 15 Hz and VT at 2.5 J x 12 Hz. Ablation efficiency decreased with higher Joules. VB at 1.5 J x 20 Hz and SP at 2.5 J x 12 Hz were the only settings to obtain 85% ablation at 5 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>In vitro</i> laser lithotripsy using a BegoStone phantom, VB at 2J x15 Hz and VT at 2.5 J x 12 Hz were the most efficient setting for pop-dusting with the Quanta Litho 150. The highest efficiency (mg/min) was achieved with VB at 2 J x 15 Hz and VT at 2.5 J x 12 Hz at 1:15 min.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 2","pages":"120-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063913/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144015848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty is it a valid alternate option in pediatric age group: A comparative retrospective study. 肾盂成形术失败的球囊扩张是儿童年龄组的有效替代选择:一项比较回顾性研究。
IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_94_24
Naif Alqarni, Fahad Alyami, Abdullah Alrumaih, Faisal Joueidi, Mohammad Alshayie, Mohammad A Alrefaei, Abdulrahman A Alsarari, Nayef Latta, Hamza M Kossai Enabi, Areej Alfattani, Areej Alsuwaida

Introduction: In pediatric patients, the preferred intervention following a failed pyeloplasty is a surgical challenge. Balloon dilatation is a minimally invasive option with low complication rates. However, redo-pyeloplasty provides workable and effective outcomes but is more technically demanding. The study demonstrates our experience with redo-pyeloplasty for previously failed pyeloplasty compared to balloon dilatation.

Methodology: A total of 298 patients underwent pyeloplasty between 2013 and 2022. Out of these 19 patients (6%), aged 11 months to 12 years (median age 7 years) had failed pyeloplasty; 11 patients underwent redo-pyeloplasty (robotic in 63.6%[7] and laparoscopic in 36.4% [4]), and eight patients were treated with balloon dilatation. Ultrasound and renogram were performed to evaluate the patient's outcomes. Success was defined as improving hydronephrosis in 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1-year follow-up without an obstructed curve in renogram. The aim is to evaluate and assess the success rate and outcomes of redo-pyeloplasty compared to antegrade/retrograde balloon dilatation in pediatric patients with a previously failed pyeloplasty.

Results: All patients who underwent redo pyeloplasty had successful outcomes (100%). However, of patients who underwent balloon dilatation, only 1 (12.5%) patient had a successful outcome, and seven patients (87%) did not show improvement. Patients' age, gender, and laterality of ureteropelvic junction obstruction were insignificant among both groups.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that balloon dilatation has a meager success rate in managing failed pyeloplasty cases. Redo-pyeloplasty procedures, either robotic or laparoscopic, have the potential to offer superior results.

在儿科患者中,肾盂成形术失败后的首选干预措施是一个手术挑战。球囊扩张术是一种微创的选择,并发症发生率低。然而,重新肾盂成形术提供了可行和有效的结果,但技术要求更高。本研究表明,与球囊扩张术相比,我们对先前失败的肾盂成形术进行再肾盂成形术的经验。方法:2013年至2022年间,共有298名患者接受了肾盂成形术。在这19例(6%)患者中,年龄11个月至12岁(中位年龄7岁)肾盂成形术失败;11例患者行肾盂成形术(机器人63.6%,腹腔镜36.4%),8例患者行球囊扩张术。通过超声和肾图评估患者的预后。成功的定义是在6周、3个月、6个月和1年的随访中肾图曲线无阻塞,肾积水得到改善。目的是评估肾盂成形术与顺行/逆行球囊扩张在肾盂成形术失败的儿童患者中的成功率和结果。结果:所有再次行肾盂成形术的患者均获得成功(100%)。然而,在接受球囊扩张的患者中,只有1例(12.5%)患者预后成功,7例(87%)患者没有表现出改善。两组患者的年龄、性别、输尿管盂连接处梗阻的偏侧性差异不显著。结论:我们证明球囊扩张在治疗肾盂成形术失败的病例中成功率很低。无论是机器人手术还是腹腔镜手术,都有可能提供更好的结果。
{"title":"Balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty is it a valid alternate option in pediatric age group: A comparative retrospective study.","authors":"Naif Alqarni, Fahad Alyami, Abdullah Alrumaih, Faisal Joueidi, Mohammad Alshayie, Mohammad A Alrefaei, Abdulrahman A Alsarari, Nayef Latta, Hamza M Kossai Enabi, Areej Alfattani, Areej Alsuwaida","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_94_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_94_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In pediatric patients, the preferred intervention following a failed pyeloplasty is a surgical challenge. Balloon dilatation is a minimally invasive option with low complication rates. However, redo-pyeloplasty provides workable and effective outcomes but is more technically demanding. The study demonstrates our experience with redo-pyeloplasty for previously failed pyeloplasty compared to balloon dilatation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 298 patients underwent pyeloplasty between 2013 and 2022. Out of these 19 patients (6%), aged 11 months to 12 years (median age 7 years) had failed pyeloplasty; 11 patients underwent redo-pyeloplasty (robotic in 63.6%[7] and laparoscopic in 36.4% [4]), and eight patients were treated with balloon dilatation. Ultrasound and renogram were performed to evaluate the patient's outcomes. Success was defined as improving hydronephrosis in 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1-year follow-up without an obstructed curve in renogram. The aim is to evaluate and assess the success rate and outcomes of redo-pyeloplasty compared to antegrade/retrograde balloon dilatation in pediatric patients with a previously failed pyeloplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients who underwent redo pyeloplasty had successful outcomes (100%). However, of patients who underwent balloon dilatation, only 1 (12.5%) patient had a successful outcome, and seven patients (87%) did not show improvement. Patients' age, gender, and laterality of ureteropelvic junction obstruction were insignificant among both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that balloon dilatation has a meager success rate in managing failed pyeloplasty cases. Redo-pyeloplasty procedures, either robotic or laparoscopic, have the potential to offer superior results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 2","pages":"108-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063917/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144020529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to reduce intraoperative preparation and docking time to minimal in a team with a robotic naïve surgical experience? 在拥有机器人naïve手术经验的团队中,如何将术中准备和对接时间减少到最小?
IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_7_25
Panagiotis Kallidonis, Vasileios Tatanis, Arman Tsaturyan, Angelis Peteinaris, Solon Faitatziadis, Gabriel Faria-Costa, Kristiana Gkeka, Theodoros Spinos, Theofanis Vrettos, Abdurrahman Al-Aown, Jens-Uwe Stolzenbur, Evangelos Liatsikos

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of preoperative training in an experimental setting on the preparation and docking of the avatera robotic system.

Materials and methods: Two different surgical groups (consisting of two nurses, one assistant, and one operating surgeon) attended an initial training on robot draping and docking procedures. Group 1 was involved in 10 robotic-assisted operations while Group 2 was trained in the dry lab using an artificial insufflated abdominal model (10 sessions). The decrease in time needed for docking and draping was evaluated. After the completion of the initial training, each group performed docking and draping procedures in five surgeries (including robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and pyeloplasty) and the recorded times were compared.

Results: In Group 1, the docking and draping time were diminished during the initial training program from 17 to 7 min and from 12 to 5 min, respectively. In Group 2, the docking time was decreased from 9 to 6 min and the draping time from 8 to 5 min. Both types of training (during real-life OR program vs. dry laboratory setting inclusive an insufflated abdominal model) resulted in nearly the same positive training effect for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively.

Conclusions: Conducing a training of patient preparation and docking in the dry laboratory using an insufflated abdominal model facilitates experience acquisition in a safe and calm environment. The training method of Group 2 might help to avoid the potentially longer anesthesia times for patients during the early learning curve of Group 1.

目的:在实验环境下评估术前训练对avatera机器人系统制备和对接的影响。材料和方法:两个不同的手术组(由两名护士、一名助理和一名手术医生组成)参加了机器人悬垂和对接程序的初步培训。第1组进行10次机器人辅助手术,第2组在干燥实验室进行人工充气腹部模型训练(10次)。对对接和悬垂所需时间的减少进行了评估。初始训练完成后,各组分别进行5次手术(包括机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和肾盂成形术)的对接和悬垂手术,并比较记录的时间。结果:第1组在初始训练过程中,对接和悬垂时间分别从17分钟减少到7分钟和从12分钟减少到5分钟。在第2组中,对接时间从9分钟减少到6分钟,悬吊时间从8分钟减少到5分钟。两种类型的训练(在真实的手术室项目中与包括充气腹部模型的干燥实验室环境中)分别对第1组和第2组产生了几乎相同的积极训练效果。结论:在干燥实验室中使用充气腹部模型进行患者准备和对接训练,有助于在安全、平静的环境中获得经验。第二组的训练方法可能有助于避免患者在第一组的早期学习曲线中可能出现的较长的麻醉时间。
{"title":"How to reduce intraoperative preparation and docking time to minimal in a team with a robotic naïve surgical experience?","authors":"Panagiotis Kallidonis, Vasileios Tatanis, Arman Tsaturyan, Angelis Peteinaris, Solon Faitatziadis, Gabriel Faria-Costa, Kristiana Gkeka, Theodoros Spinos, Theofanis Vrettos, Abdurrahman Al-Aown, Jens-Uwe Stolzenbur, Evangelos Liatsikos","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_7_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_7_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of preoperative training in an experimental setting on the preparation and docking of the avatera robotic system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two different surgical groups (consisting of two nurses, one assistant, and one operating surgeon) attended an initial training on robot draping and docking procedures. Group 1 was involved in 10 robotic-assisted operations while Group 2 was trained in the dry lab using an artificial insufflated abdominal model (10 sessions). The decrease in time needed for docking and draping was evaluated. After the completion of the initial training, each group performed docking and draping procedures in five surgeries (including robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and pyeloplasty) and the recorded times were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, the docking and draping time were diminished during the initial training program from 17 to 7 min and from 12 to 5 min, respectively. In Group 2, the docking time was decreased from 9 to 6 min and the draping time from 8 to 5 min. Both types of training (during real-life OR program vs. dry laboratory setting inclusive an insufflated abdominal model) resulted in nearly the same positive training effect for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conducing a training of patient preparation and docking in the dry laboratory using an insufflated abdominal model facilitates experience acquisition in a safe and calm environment. The training method of Group 2 might help to avoid the potentially longer anesthesia times for patients during the early learning curve of Group 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 2","pages":"127-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063918/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144001252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Difference between magnetic versus conventional ureteral stents in morbidity and efficiency after double J stents removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 磁性输尿管支架与常规输尿管支架在双J型支架取出后的发病率和效率的差异:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_99_24
Kharisma Prasetya Adhyatma, Muhammad Haritsyah Warli, Elbert, Felix Khosasi, Dianita Halimah Harahap

Context: Ureteral stents are crucial in urological surgery, promoting urine passage and preventing obstruction. They have undergone design, material, and covering changes to minimize pain and enhance efficiency. Researchers are exploring the use of magnetic stents, which use magnets attached to the stent's end.

Aims: This research aims to evaluate and analyze the expulsion of magnetic double J (DJ) stents as compared to conventional methods DJ stents, using qualitative and quantitative data from the literature about morbidity, discomfort, cost, duration, safety, and efficiency.

Settings and design: This research is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Subjects and methods: RCTs comparing the removal of magnetic DJ stents to conventional stents were identified through an extensive search Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane from January 2014 to January 2024. The search methodology and criteria for eligibility were developed using a modified PICO framework, and the risk of bias in the RCTs was evaluated with the RoB-2 tool. The removal duration, ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ), and pain (measured by visual analog scale) were pooled for meta-analysis.

Statistical analysis used: The Cochrane Collaboration tool called Review Manager 5.4 will be used to collect quantitative data. The main outcome was evaluated using continuous data, with the mean difference (MD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) applied. A P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Heterogeneity between studies will be evaluated in this meta-analysis using I² (I²; Inconsistency).

Results: There were six RCT studies involving 570 participants that were finally eligible for the quantitative analysis. Magnetic DJ stent was found to significantly shorten the duration of removal (MD -30.51; 95% CI, -51.82--9.21; P = 0.005) and less pain during removal (MD -2.71; 95% CI, -3.74--1.68; P < 0.00001) than conventional DJ stent. USSQ scores for urinary symptoms (MD 1.88; 95% CI, 0.56-3.19; P = 0.005) and sexual matters (MD 1.18; 95% CI, 0.54-1.82; P = 0.0003) were significantly higher for magnetic than for conventional stents.

Conclusions: Magnetic DJ stent removal offers enhanced safety, efficiency, less pain, a shorter time of removal, and lower costs compared to conventional methods. However, it has a higher UUSQ score for urinary symptoms and sexual matters.

背景:输尿管支架在泌尿外科手术中起着至关重要的作用,它能促进尿液通过,防止梗阻。它们经历了设计、材料和覆盖的变化,以尽量减少痛苦并提高效率。研究人员正在探索使用磁性支架,将磁铁附着在支架的末端。目的:本研究旨在利用文献中关于发病率、不适、成本、持续时间、安全性和效率的定性和定量数据,评估和分析磁性双J (DJ)支架与传统方法DJ支架的比较。背景和设计:本研究是一项随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统综述和荟萃分析。对象和方法:2014年1月至2024年1月,通过广泛检索Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和Cochrane,确定了比较磁性DJ支架移除与常规支架移除的随机对照试验。使用改进的PICO框架制定搜索方法和资格标准,并使用rob2工具评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险。将取出时间、输尿管支架症状问卷(USSQ)和疼痛(用视觉模拟量表测量)合并进行meta分析。使用的统计分析:将使用Cochrane协作工具Review Manager 5.4收集定量数据。使用连续数据评估主要结局,采用平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。本荟萃分析将使用I²(I²;不一致)。结果:有6项RCT研究,涉及570名参与者,最终符合定量分析的条件。发现磁性DJ支架明显缩短了取出时间(MD -30.51;95% ci, -51.82—9.21;P = 0.005),且术后疼痛减轻(MD -2.71;95% ci, -3.74—1.68;P < 0.00001)。泌尿系统症状的USSQ评分(MD 1.88;95% ci, 0.56-3.19;P = 0.005)和性问题(MD 1.18;95% ci, 0.54-1.82;P = 0.0003),磁性支架明显高于常规支架。结论:与传统方法相比,磁性DJ支架置入术具有更高的安全性、效率、更少的疼痛、更短的置入术时间和更低的成本。然而,它在泌尿系统症状和性问题上的usq得分更高。
{"title":"Difference between magnetic versus conventional ureteral stents in morbidity and efficiency after double J stents removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Kharisma Prasetya Adhyatma, Muhammad Haritsyah Warli, Elbert, Felix Khosasi, Dianita Halimah Harahap","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_99_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_99_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Ureteral stents are crucial in urological surgery, promoting urine passage and preventing obstruction. They have undergone design, material, and covering changes to minimize pain and enhance efficiency. Researchers are exploring the use of magnetic stents, which use magnets attached to the stent's end.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This research aims to evaluate and analyze the expulsion of magnetic double J (DJ) stents as compared to conventional methods DJ stents, using qualitative and quantitative data from the literature about morbidity, discomfort, cost, duration, safety, and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This research is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>RCTs comparing the removal of magnetic DJ stents to conventional stents were identified through an extensive search Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane from January 2014 to January 2024. The search methodology and criteria for eligibility were developed using a modified PICO framework, and the risk of bias in the RCTs was evaluated with the RoB-2 tool. The removal duration, ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ), and pain (measured by visual analog scale) were pooled for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The Cochrane Collaboration tool called Review Manager 5.4 will be used to collect quantitative data. The main outcome was evaluated using continuous data, with the mean difference (MD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) applied. A <i>P</i> < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Heterogeneity between studies will be evaluated in this meta-analysis using <i>I</i>² (<i>I</i>²; Inconsistency).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were six RCT studies involving 570 participants that were finally eligible for the quantitative analysis. Magnetic DJ stent was found to significantly shorten the duration of removal (MD -30.51; 95% CI, -51.82--9.21; <i>P</i> = 0.005) and less pain during removal (MD -2.71; 95% CI, -3.74--1.68; <i>P</i> < 0.00001) than conventional DJ stent. USSQ scores for urinary symptoms (MD 1.88; 95% CI, 0.56-3.19; <i>P</i> = 0.005) and sexual matters (MD 1.18; 95% CI, 0.54-1.82; <i>P</i> = 0.0003) were significantly higher for magnetic than for conventional stents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Magnetic DJ stent removal offers enhanced safety, efficiency, less pain, a shorter time of removal, and lower costs compared to conventional methods. However, it has a higher UUSQ score for urinary symptoms and sexual matters.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 2","pages":"97-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063915/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143988552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 经皮肾镜取石术、逆行肾内手术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_60_24
Abdullah Barghash Alanazi, Rawan Marzooq Alsolami, Abdulaziz Albalawi, Abdullah Almousa, Abdullatif Alhassan, Mutlaq Alotaibi, Hossam S El-Tholoth, Ahmed Alzahrani, Abdulrahman F Alruwaily

Background: Numerous therapeutic strategies have been developed as a result of the rise in the prevalence of renal stones. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are currently available treatments for lower-pole renal stones (LPRSs). This systematic review and meta-main analysis's primary objective were to assess the requisite studies that examined the effectiveness of ESWL, RIRS, and PCNL for treating LPRS.

Materials and methods: This study adhered to PRISMA guidelines' guiding principles. In two stages, the desired studies were extracted. In the initial screening, we identified 850 related articles from the years 2004 to 2022 using the keywords. Unfortunately, 350 studies were disqualified because they failed to meet our inclusion requirements; the remaining studies underwent additional screening. In the second stage, two authors went through the entire text of the articles and found duplicates and missing data. Ten articles were eventually selected for the research's conclusion.

Results: PCNL and RIRS had higher stone-free rates than ESWL and needed fewer treatment sessions out of the total of 10 clinical trials that were considered to be eligible. While ESWL required more ESWL sessions, operative time and complications seemed to benefit ESWL over PCNL. RIRS looked to be the most efficient technique for treating stones in the lower pole that were up to 1 cm in diameter.

Conclusion: To achieve stone-free status over a brief period of time and with the fewest number of sessions, the management of LPRS should probably be PCNL or RIRS, according to the pooled meta-analysis of the eligible trials in our systematic review. RIRS was more effective than ESWL for stones <10 mm in size. The choice between the two methods (PCNL or RIRS) should be made specifically for each patient depending on their anatomical characteristics, comorbidities, and preferences as deemed appropriate by the attending clinician.

背景:由于肾结石患病率的上升,许多治疗策略已经被开发出来。体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)、逆行肾内手术(RIRS)和经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是目前治疗低位肾结石(lprs)的有效方法。本系统综述和meta-main分析的主要目的是评估ESWL、RIRS和PCNL治疗LPRS有效性的必要研究。材料和方法:本研究遵循PRISMA指南的指导原则。分两个阶段提取所需的研究。在最初的筛选中,我们使用关键词确定了从2004年到2022年的850篇相关文章。不幸的是,有350项研究因未能满足我们的纳入要求而被取消资格;其余的研究进行了额外的筛选。在第二阶段,两位作者检查了文章的全文,发现重复和缺失的数据。最终选择了10篇文章作为研究的结论。结果:PCNL和RIRS比ESWL有更高的无结石率,并且在总共10个被认为符合条件的临床试验中需要更少的治疗时间。虽然ESWL需要更多的ESWL疗程,但手术时间和并发症似乎比PCNL更有利于ESWL。RIRS看起来是治疗直径达1厘米的下极结石最有效的技术。结论:根据我们系统综述中符合条件的试验的汇总荟萃分析,为了在短时间内以最少的次数达到无结石状态,LPRS的管理可能应该是PCNL或RIRS。对于结石,RIRS比ESWL更有效
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdullah Barghash Alanazi, Rawan Marzooq Alsolami, Abdulaziz Albalawi, Abdullah Almousa, Abdullatif Alhassan, Mutlaq Alotaibi, Hossam S El-Tholoth, Ahmed Alzahrani, Abdulrahman F Alruwaily","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_60_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_60_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous therapeutic strategies have been developed as a result of the rise in the prevalence of renal stones. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are currently available treatments for lower-pole renal stones (LPRSs). This systematic review and meta-main analysis's primary objective were to assess the requisite studies that examined the effectiveness of ESWL, RIRS, and PCNL for treating LPRS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study adhered to PRISMA guidelines' guiding principles. In two stages, the desired studies were extracted. In the initial screening, we identified 850 related articles from the years 2004 to 2022 using the keywords. Unfortunately, 350 studies were disqualified because they failed to meet our inclusion requirements; the remaining studies underwent additional screening. In the second stage, two authors went through the entire text of the articles and found duplicates and missing data. Ten articles were eventually selected for the research's conclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCNL and RIRS had higher stone-free rates than ESWL and needed fewer treatment sessions out of the total of 10 clinical trials that were considered to be eligible. While ESWL required more ESWL sessions, operative time and complications seemed to benefit ESWL over PCNL. RIRS looked to be the most efficient technique for treating stones in the lower pole that were up to 1 cm in diameter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To achieve stone-free status over a brief period of time and with the fewest number of sessions, the management of LPRS should probably be PCNL or RIRS, according to the pooled meta-analysis of the eligible trials in our systematic review. RIRS was more effective than ESWL for stones <10 mm in size. The choice between the two methods (PCNL or RIRS) should be made specifically for each patient depending on their anatomical characteristics, comorbidities, and preferences as deemed appropriate by the attending clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 2","pages":"74-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063916/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144053736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effectiveness radial shockwave therapy versus focused linear shockwave therapy as an erectile dysfunction treatment systematic review and meta-analysis. 放射冲击波治疗与聚焦线性冲击波治疗勃起功能障碍的疗效比较系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_13_25
Taufik Ramadhani, Syah Mirsya Warli, Ramlan Nasution, Dhirajaya Dharma Kadar, Muhammad Haritsyah Warli

Low-intensity shockwave therapy (SWT) is a promising non-invasive treatment for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). Two primary modalities, focused linear shockwave therapy (fSWT) and radial shockwave therapy (rSWT), differ in energy delivery and tissue penetration. While fSWT is well-studied, rSWT remains less explored for ED despite its growing use. This study compares the effectiveness of fSWT and rSWT in improving erectile function. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Relevant studies published between 2009 and 2024 were identified through searches in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. Studies assessing erectile function using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), or Erection Hardness Score (EHS) were included. A random-effects model was applied to analyze standardized mean differences (SMD) and address heterogeneity. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed that fSWT demonstrated superior efficacy compared to rSWT, with an SMD of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.04-0.86; P < 0.005). High heterogeneity was observed (I² = 80% for rSWT; I² = 99% for fSWT). fSWT and rSWT improved erectile function, but fSWT consistently produces better outcomes across IIEF-5, SHIM, and EHS scores.

低强度冲击波治疗(SWT)是治疗血管源性勃起功能障碍(ED)的一种很有前途的无创治疗方法。两种主要的治疗方式,聚焦线性冲击波治疗(fSWT)和径向冲击波治疗(rSWT),在能量传递和组织穿透方面有所不同。虽然fSWT已经得到了很好的研究,但rSWT在ED中的应用却很少。本研究比较了fSWT和rSWT在改善勃起功能方面的有效性。按照PRISMA 2020指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。2009年至2024年间发表的相关研究通过PubMed、ScienceDirect和Cochrane Library进行检索。包括使用国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)、男性性健康量表(SHIM)或勃起硬度评分(EHS)评估勃起功能的研究。采用随机效应模型分析标准化平均差异(SMD)和异质性。15项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,与rSWT相比,fSWT表现出更好的疗效,SMD为0.45 (95% CI: 0.04-0.86;P < 0.005)。rSWT观察到高度异质性(I²= 80%;对于fSWT, I²= 99%)。fSWT和rSWT改善了勃起功能,但fSWT在IIEF-5、SHIM和EHS评分中始终具有更好的结果。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness radial shockwave therapy versus focused linear shockwave therapy as an erectile dysfunction treatment systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Taufik Ramadhani, Syah Mirsya Warli, Ramlan Nasution, Dhirajaya Dharma Kadar, Muhammad Haritsyah Warli","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_13_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_13_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-intensity shockwave therapy (SWT) is a promising non-invasive treatment for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). Two primary modalities, focused linear shockwave therapy (fSWT) and radial shockwave therapy (rSWT), differ in energy delivery and tissue penetration. While fSWT is well-studied, rSWT remains less explored for ED despite its growing use. This study compares the effectiveness of fSWT and rSWT in improving erectile function. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Relevant studies published between 2009 and 2024 were identified through searches in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. Studies assessing erectile function using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), or Erection Hardness Score (EHS) were included. A random-effects model was applied to analyze standardized mean differences (SMD) and address heterogeneity. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed that fSWT demonstrated superior efficacy compared to rSWT, with an SMD of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.04-0.86; <i>P</i> < 0.005). High heterogeneity was observed (<i>I</i>² = 80% for rSWT; <i>I</i>² = 99% for fSWT). fSWT and rSWT improved erectile function, but fSWT consistently produces better outcomes across IIEF-5, SHIM, and EHS scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 2","pages":"84-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144026040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Urology Annals
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1