Background: Interdisciplinary medical treatment is required to care for patients with complex autoimmune diseases. Although there are an increasing number of interdisciplinary centers for autoimmune diseases in Germany, they are not yet available throughout the country and the focuses and interdisciplinary structures are not organized according to a generally agreed standard. Furthermore, they are not regularly reflected in the general care structure.
The aim of the work: To analyze the care structure using as an example an established center and a clinical case to demonstrate the usefulness of in-house standardized procedures.
Material and methods: In order to determine the status quo regarding interdisciplinary centers for autoimmune diseases in Germany, a university hospital is exemplarily presented for a structural analysis and a case presentation from another center to demonstrate the importance of an interdisciplinary patient care.
Results: At the selected center for autoimmune diseases of the university hospital, patients with autoimmune diseases receive interdisciplinary care from experts from various disciplines. The structures are anchored in an organizational chart. The case report demonstrates a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic pathway (standardized operating procedures, SOP) in a patient with systemic sclerosis and lung involvement.
Discussion: The article discusses which measures are necessary across disciplines for comprehensive diagnostics and treatment of certain autoimmune diseases, which challenges arise during implementation and which advantages can arise compared to guidelines because, among other things, they can be immediately adapted. The establishment of a national consensus for the structure, necessary settings and implementation into patient care within an interdisciplinary center for autoimmune diseases is desirable.
Introduction: The chatbot ChatGPT represents a milestone in the interaction between humans and large databases that are accessible via the internet. It facilitates the answering of complex questions by enabling a communication in everyday language. Therefore, it is a potential source of information for those who are affected by rheumatic diseases. The aim of our investigation was to find out whether ChatGPT (version 3.5) is capable of giving qualified answers regarding the application of specific methods of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in three rheumatic diseases: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). In addition, it was investigated how the answers of the chatbot were influenced by the wording of the question.
Methods: The questioning of ChatGPT was performed in three parts. Part A consisted of an open question regarding the best way of treatment of the respective disease. In part B, the questions were directed towards possible indications for the application of CAM in general in one of the three disorders. In part C, the chatbot was asked for specific recommendations regarding one of three CAM methods: homeopathy, ayurvedic medicine and herbal medicine. Questions in parts B and C were expressed in two modifications: firstly, it was asked whether the specific CAM was applicable at all in certain rheumatic diseases. The second question asked which procedure of the respective CAM method worked best in the specific disease. The validity of the answers was checked by using the ChatGPT reliability score, a Likert scale ranging from 1 (lowest validity) to 7 (highest validity).
Results: The answers to the open questions of part A had the highest validity. In parts B and C, ChatGPT suggested a variety of CAM applications that lacked scientific evidence. The validity of the answers depended on the wording of the questions. If the question suggested the inclination to apply a certain CAM, the answers often lacked the information of missing evidence and were graded with lower score values.
Conclusion: The answers of ChatGPT (version 3.5) regarding the applicability of CAM in selected rheumatic diseases are not convincingly based on scientific evidence. In addition, the wording of the questions affects the validity of the information. Currently, an uncritical application of ChatGPT as an instrument for patient information cannot be recommended.
Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects of a remote video-based cervical stabilization exercise program on cervical proprioception, functional status, and disease-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Design: Patients with RA were evaluated regarding cervical joint positioning error, cervical region functional status (Neck Disability Index), general functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire), and disease-related quality of life (Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Scale). Patients were randomized to exercise (n = 14, 10 female) and control (n = 12, 9 female) groups. Patients in the exercise group performed a video-based home exercise program consisting of progressive cervical stabilization exercises three times a week for six weeks in addition to their routine medication. The patients in the control group continued their routine medication only. Evaluations were repeated in both groups in the seventh week following the baseline evaluation.
Results: Groups were similar at baseline (p > 0.05). Patients in both groups had low disease activity (DAS-28 CRP ≤ 3.2). The remote video-based exercise program led to significant improvements in cervical proprioception, functional status, and disease-related quality of life (p < 0.05). No significant changes were detected in any parameters in the control group (p > 0.05). Obtained changes were superior in the exercise group compared to the control group (d > 1.00, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Cervical stabilization exercises may increase cervical proprioception, improve functional status, and enhance disease-related quality of life in patients with RA when administered as a remote program.
Trial number: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04948775 , NCT04948775.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for both all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: We conducted an extensive search across the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies investigating SMRs for all-cause and/or cause-specific mortality in individuals with RA compared to the general population. Subsequently, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis, examining SMRs across various categories, including all-cause, sex-specific, ethnicity-specific, and cause-specific SMRs in RA patients.
Results: Seventeen studies involving 486,098 patients with RA and 63,988 deaths met the inclusion criteria. Patients with RA had a 1.522-fold increase in all-cause SMR (SMR 1.522, 95% CI 1.340-1.704, p < 0.001) compared to the general population. Stratification by ethnicity revealed that the all-cause SMR was 1.575 (95% CI 1.207-1.943) in Caucasians and 1.355 (95% CI 1.140-1.569) in Asians. The gender-specific meta-analysis revealed elevated SMR in both women and men. RA patients exhibited an increased risk of mortality attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD), respiratory disease, infection, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). However, no significant increase in SMR was observed for mortality due to malignancy.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis study highlights a 1.522-fold increase in SMR in patients with RA compared to that in the general population, irrespective of sex or region. Additionally, a notable increase in mortality associated with specific causes, including CVD, respiratory disease, infection, and CVA, underscores the critical need for targeted interventions to manage these heightened risks in patients with RA.
A 70-year-old female patient presented with unilateral blindness of the right eye. As C‑reactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were inconspicuous, a nonarteritic embolic occlusion was assumed; however, after detailed anamnesis large vessel vasculitis (LVV) appeared more likely, which was confirmed by the subsequent imaging diagnostics. This rare case of LVV without an increase in one of the inflammatory parameters CRP or ESR highlights the importance of the medical history and targeted diagnostic procedures.
A German expert committee recommends defining fast-track clinics (FTC) for the acute diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) as follows: easy and prompt reachability at least on weekdays, scheduling appointments ideally within 24 h, examination by a specialist with GCA expertise, ≥ 2 experts per FTC, ≥ 50 patients with suspected GCA per year, sonologists with ≥ 300 (≥ 50) temporal and axillary artery examinations, adherence to standard operating procedures, availability of an ≥ 18 (≥ 15) MHz and a lower frequency linear ultrasound probe, and collaboration with partners for neurology and ophthalmology consultations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT, possibly CT), and for temporal artery biopsy.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect and safety of telitacicept, an antagonist of BLyS/APRIL-mediated B cell activation, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who failed treatment with belimumab and in whom telitacicept was administered combined with conventional therapy. A review of published reports on telitacicept for SLE was also performed.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the records of patients seen in the Department of Rheumatology at the Wuhan Hospital of Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, China, with refractory SLE who had failed treatment with belimumab. The terms "systemic lupus erythematosus" and "telitacicept" were used to identify patients reported in the English medical literature.
Results: Identified were 14 refractory SLE patients, 3 males (21%) and 11 females (79%). The median age was 32.9 years. The median disease duration was 8.9 years. Patients in this cohort received telitacicept for an average of 34.1 weeks (17-62 weeks) and the total SLE responder index 4 (SRI-4) response rate was 78.9% (n = 11). The mean SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score declined from 8.6 at baseline (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.87-9.28) to 4.29 at the endpoint (95% CI 3.4-5.16). All cases (100%) had hypocomplementemia at baseline, and 7 cases (50%) reported normal C3 and C4 levels at the follow-up endpoint. At the observation endpoint, the 24‑h urinary protein value of the 13 cases with proteinuria (baseline 24‑h urinary protein > 0.5 g/d) displayed a reduction, and 3 values turned negative. Although some patients had low serum total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels, subnormal IgG levels, and absolute counts of peripheral blood lymphocytes after treatment, no serious infection was reported. One case was refractory lupus hepatitis confirmed by liver pathology, and upon change to change to telitacicept treatment, liver function returned to normal.
Conclusion: This is the first case series in SLE patients who accepted telitacicept treatment after failed treatment with belimumab. Our case series and review of the literature show that telitacicept combined with the original standard treatment may significantly improve disease activity while reducing prednisone use. No major safety issues were seen in this group of patients. Telitacicept may be a promising drug for the treatment of refractory lupus hepatitis.
In October 2023, the organization of the German-speaking scientific osteological societies (DVO) published the revised guideline on the "Prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and in men aged over 50." This review article reflects the new features of the guideline and their relevance in the care of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.A key innovation is the change from the 10-year fracture risk to the 3‑year fracture risk. Basic diagnostics are currently performed without a defined fracture threshold. Treatment thresholds for specific osteological therapy constitute another key innovation, defined as 3% to < 5%, 5% to < 10%, and from 10% for vertebral body and femoral neck fractures. If the 3‑year fracture risk is > 10%, osteoanabolic therapy should primarily be carried out and antiresorptive therapy is initiated following osteoanabolic therapy. In addition, patients with osteoporosis and prolonged glucocorticoid therapy should primarily be treated osteoanabolically with teriparatide. In summary, the changes to the DVO guideline reflect the latest scientific study findings in osteology and lead to detailed differential therapy for osteoporosis.
Fever can be due to infectious or noninfectious causes and results from the body's natural response to exogenous or endogenous pyrogens. Laboratory tests including complete blood count, differential blood count, C‑reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and procalcitonin do not have sufficient sensitivity and specificity to definitively detect or rule out an infectious (bacterial, viral, parasitic) cause of fever. Blood cultures should be carried out when bacteremic or septic illnesses are suspected. Fever is not always present in infections and can be absent, especially in older and immunocompromised patients. If fever is suspected, core temperatures should be taken, e.g., rectally, orally or invasively. Depending on the clinical situation, infectious causes must be excluded as the most likely cause of an acutely occurring fever. The investigation of long-standing fever (fever of unknown origin, FUO) can be complex and some infectious diseases should first be ruled out, whereby a syndromic classification often helps to clarify the cause of the fever.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：