Background: Previously we performed clinical encapsulated neonatal porcine islet transplantation under comprehensive regulation, and demonstrated the efficacy and safety. To analyze the patients' quality of life (QOL), we assessed patients' opinions 10 years after islet xenotransplantation.
Methods: Twenty-one type 1 diabetic patients received microencapsulated neonatal porcine islet transplants in Argentina were enrolled. Seven patients were enrolled in efficacy and safety study and 14 patients were enrolled in safety studies. Patients' opinions related to the current and pre-transplant status of diabetes control, blood glucose levels, severe hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia required hospitalization were analyzed. In addition, opinions related to islet xenotransplantation were assessed.
Results: At the time of this survey, average HbA1c was still significantly lower compared to pre-transplantation (8.5 ± 0.9 (%) at pre-transplant and 7.4 ± 0.5(%) at the survey, p < .05) and average insulin dose were also lower (0.95 ± 0.32 (IU/kg) at pre-transplant and 0.73 ± 0.27 (IU) at the survey). The majority of patients improved diabetes control (71%), blood glucose levels (76%), severe hypoglycemia (86%) and hyperglycemia required hospitalization (76%), and no patients deteriorated in all of the categories when compared with pre-transplantation. No patients had cancer, or psychological problem, and one patient had a serious adverse event. The majority of patients wanted to recommend this treatment to other patients (76%) and receive booster transplantation (85.7%).
Conclusions: The majority of patients had positive opinions related to the encapsulated porcine islet xenotransplantation 10 years after transplantation.
After a significant hiatus imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, we hereby restart Xenotransplantation literature updates. With the recently performed clinical xenotransplantation cases and the much-heightened interest in the field, we have determined that this is an optimal time to reinstate this section. There has been an invigorated focus on unique challenges posed by pig-to-human xenotransplantation, and specific attention will be given to this aspect. In this issue, we aimed to cover the gap and compiled the most relevant publications from March 2021 to March 2023.
Formal clinical trials of pig-to-human organ transplant-known asxenotransplantation-may begin this decade, with the first trials likely to consist of either adult renal transplants or pediatric cardiac transplant patients. Xenotransplantation as a systematic scientific study only reaches back to the latter half of the 20th century, with episodic xenotransplantation events occurring prior to that. As the science of xenotransplantation has progressed in the 20th and 21st centuries, the public's knowledge of the potential therapy has also increased. With this, there have been shifting ethical stances toward xenotransplantation in key areas, such as religious and public viewpoints towards xenotransplantation, animal rights, and public health concerns. This review provides a historical-ethical account of xenotransplantation and details if or how viewpoints have shifted over time.
Background: Recent years have seen major advancements in xenotransplantation: the first pig-to-human heart transplant, the development of a brain-dead recipient model for kidney xenotransplantation, and the registration of the first xenokidney clinical trial. The attitudes of patients with kidney disease or transplants on xenotransplantation and an assessment of their reservations and considerations regarding the technology are crucial to successful clinical translation and eventual widespread implementation.
Methods: This systematic review was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42022344581) prior to initiation of the study and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included studies that evaluated attitudes towards and willingness to undergo xenotransplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), including those who had already undergone transplantation. MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Elsevier), and Web of Science (via Clarivate) were searched from database inception to July 15, 2022 by an experienced medical librarian for studies on xenotransplantation and attitudes. Abstracts and full text were screened using Covidence software and data items regarding study methodology, patient demographics, and attitudes regarding xenotransplantation were extracted using Microsoft Excel. Risk of bias assessments were performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programmed and National Institute of Health study quality assessment tools.
Results: Of 1992 studies identified, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted across eight countries, four in the United States, for a total of 3114 patients on the kidney waitlist or with a kidney transplant. All patients were over 17 years old and 58% were male. Acceptance of a xenotransplant was assessed using surveys in 12 studies. Sixty-three percent (n = 1354) of kidney patients reported that they would accept a xenotransplant with function comparable to that of an allotransplant. Acceptance of xenografts with inferior function to allografts (15%) or as bridge organs (35%) to allotransplantation was lower. Specific concerns expressed by patients included graft function, infection, social stigma, and animal rights. Subgroup analyses showed higher acceptance in already transplanted compared to waitlist patients and white compared to Black Americans.
Conclusion: An understanding of patient attitudes and reservations is key to the successful execution of the first xenotransplantation clinical trials. This study compiles important factors to consider, such as patient concerns, attitudes regarding practical clinical scenarios for the use of xenotransplantation, and the impact of demographic factors on acceptance of this emerging technology.
Surgical intervention is required to successfully treat severe, large-gap (≥4 cm) peripheral nerve injuries. However, all existing treatments have shortcomings and an alternative to the use of autologous nerves is needed. Human and porcine nerves are physiologically similar, with comparable dimensions and architecture, presence and distribution of Schwann cells, and conserved features of the extracellular matrix (ECM). We report the repair of fully transected radial nerves in 10 Rhesus Macaques using viable, whole sciatic nerve from genetically engineered (GalT-KO), designated pathogen free (DPF) porcine donors. This resulted in the regeneration of the transected nerve, and importantly, recovery of wrist extension function, distal muscle reinnervation, and recovery of nerve conduction velocities and compound muscle action potentials similar to autologous controls. We also demonstrate the absence of immune rejection, systemic porcine cell migration, and detectable residual porcine material. Our preliminary findings support the safety and efficacy of viable porcine nerve transplants, suggest the interchangeable therapeutic use of cross-species cells, and highlight the broader clinical potential of xenotransplantation.