首页 > 最新文献

World Journal of Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Retrospective analysis of transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair in emergency cases: A cohort study. 对急诊病例经腹腹膜前疝修补术的回顾性分析:一项队列研究。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12322
Dillon Gasper, Ivy N Haskins
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair in emergency cases: A cohort study.","authors":"Dillon Gasper, Ivy N Haskins","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12322","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wjs.12322","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-stapled colorectal anastomotic techniques: Do not cross the line. 单缝结肠直肠吻合技术:不要越界。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12342
Paul Cavallaro, Stefan D Holubar

The double-stapled technique is the most common method of colorectal anastomosis. Despite its widespread use, emerging data suggests that this technique may be a risk factor for anastomotic complications, as it is believed that crossing staple lines and resultant dog-ears are potentially weak points that are prone to ischemia and anastomotic leak. Herein, we describe technical variations of single-stapled colorectal anastomoses which surgeons can readily adopt and integrate into their armamentarium of anastomotic techniques.

双缝线技术是最常见的结肠直肠吻合术方法。尽管这种方法被广泛使用,但新出现的数据表明,这种技术可能是造成吻合并发症的一个风险因素,因为人们认为,交叉缝合线和由此产生的狗耳是潜在的薄弱点,容易造成缺血和吻合口漏。在此,我们介绍了单缝合线结直肠吻合术的技术变异,外科医生可随时采用并将其纳入自己的吻合术技术库中。
{"title":"Single-stapled colorectal anastomotic techniques: Do not cross the line.","authors":"Paul Cavallaro, Stefan D Holubar","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The double-stapled technique is the most common method of colorectal anastomosis. Despite its widespread use, emerging data suggests that this technique may be a risk factor for anastomotic complications, as it is believed that crossing staple lines and resultant dog-ears are potentially weak points that are prone to ischemia and anastomotic leak. Herein, we describe technical variations of single-stapled colorectal anastomoses which surgeons can readily adopt and integrate into their armamentarium of anastomotic techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical significance of the CALLY index in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy. 接受胃切除术的胃癌患者的 CALLY 指数的临床意义。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12357
Katsunobu Sakurai, Naoshi Kubo, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, Junya Nishimura, Yasuhito Iseki, Takafumi Nishii, Toru Inoue, Masakazu Yashiro, Yukio Nishiguchi, Kiyoshi Maeda

Background: The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical impact of the CALLY index in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy.

Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2020, 617 patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC at the Osaka City General Hospital were enrolled in this study. The CALLY index was calculated using the following formula: [albumin (g/dL) × lymphocytes (/μl)]/[CRP (mg/dL) × 104]. We compared the predictive value of four biomarkers [CALLY index, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)] for short- and long-term outcomes and focused on the CALLY index to elucidate its clinical value.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve for the CALLY index was the highest among the four biomarkers. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates in the low and the high CALLY groups were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis identified the CALLY index as an independent factor for OS and CSS but not NLR or PLR. The mGPS was an independent factor for OS but not for CSS in multivariate analysis. Regarding complications, only the CALLY index was an independent predictor of major complications (≧ Clavien-Dindo grade 3) in multivariate analysis but not others.

Conclusions: The CALLY index may have a clinical value in predicting OS, CSS, and major complications in GC patients undergoing gastrectomy.

背景:本研究旨在阐明CALLY指数对接受胃切除术的胃癌患者的临床影响:本研究旨在阐明CALLY指数对接受胃切除术的胃癌(GC)患者的临床影响:方法:2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,大阪市立综合医院共招募了 617 名接受胃切除术的 GC 患者。CALLY 指数按以下公式计算:[白蛋白(g/dL)×淋巴细胞(/μl)]/[CRP(mg/dL)×104]。我们比较了四种生物标志物[CALLY指数、改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)]对短期和长期预后的预测价值,并重点研究了CALLY指数,以阐明其临床价值:接收者操作特征分析表明,CALLY指数的曲线下面积是四种生物标志物中最大的。低CALLY组和高CALLY组的5年总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)均有统计学意义。多变量分析发现,CALLY指数是影响OS和CSS的独立因素,但不是NLR或PLR。在多变量分析中,mGPS是影响OS的独立因素,但不是影响CSS的独立因素。关于并发症,在多变量分析中,只有CALLY指数是主要并发症(≧ Clavien-Dindo 3级)的独立预测因素,而其他并发症则不是:结论:CALLY指数在预测接受胃切除术的GC患者的OS、CSS和主要并发症方面可能具有临床价值。
{"title":"Clinical significance of the CALLY index in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.","authors":"Katsunobu Sakurai, Naoshi Kubo, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, Junya Nishimura, Yasuhito Iseki, Takafumi Nishii, Toru Inoue, Masakazu Yashiro, Yukio Nishiguchi, Kiyoshi Maeda","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical impact of the CALLY index in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2014 and December 2020, 617 patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC at the Osaka City General Hospital were enrolled in this study. The CALLY index was calculated using the following formula: [albumin (g/dL) × lymphocytes (/μl)]/[CRP (mg/dL) × 10<sup>4</sup>]. We compared the predictive value of four biomarkers [CALLY index, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)] for short- and long-term outcomes and focused on the CALLY index to elucidate its clinical value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve for the CALLY index was the highest among the four biomarkers. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates in the low and the high CALLY groups were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis identified the CALLY index as an independent factor for OS and CSS but not NLR or PLR. The mGPS was an independent factor for OS but not for CSS in multivariate analysis. Regarding complications, only the CALLY index was an independent predictor of major complications (≧ Clavien-Dindo grade 3) in multivariate analysis but not others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CALLY index may have a clinical value in predicting OS, CSS, and major complications in GC patients undergoing gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: Enhanced recovery after surgery and intestinal obstruction: A scoping review. 致编辑的信:加强手术和肠梗阻后的恢复:范围综述。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12365
Uday Singh Dadhwal
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Enhanced recovery after surgery and intestinal obstruction: A scoping review.","authors":"Uday Singh Dadhwal","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12365","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Track recurrence after remote-access thyroid surgeries: A systematic review. 远程甲状腺手术后的跟踪复发:系统综述。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12361
Moon Young Oh, Young Jun Chai

Background: Remote-access thyroidectomies have gained popularity, but track recurrence, which is the implantation of thyroid tissue or lesions along the surgical access route, has been reported in case studies. This systematic review aims to review cases of track recurrence following remote-access thyroidectomies.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify case reports on track recurrence after endoscopic or robotic thyroidectomy up to June 2024. Data included patient demographics, details of the initial surgery and diagnosis, methods and timing of recurrence detection, and management strategies.

Results: The search yielded 1578 articles, of which 17 case reports comprising 18 patients were included. The patients (16 females and two males) had a mean age of 34.6 ± 14.9 years. The mean size of initial tumors was 3.9 ± 1.2 cm, with diagnoses of eight cancers and 10 benign lesions. The initial surgeries included 12 endoscopic and six robotic procedures. Track recurrence was most often detected by palpable nodules followed by routine imaging and elevated serum Tg levels. The interval between initial surgery and recurrence ranged from 3 months to 8 years. Management varied from surgical resection and radioactive iodine therapy to close observation. There were no further recurrences in all but one case postoperatively.

Conclusion: Track recurrence after remote-access thyroidectomy is rare but significant. Proper surgical techniques, careful handling of thyroid tissue, and rigorous postoperative monitoring are essential to minimize this risk. Awareness and prompt management of track recurrence may lead to favorable outcomes.

背景:远程入路甲状腺切除术越来越受欢迎,但有病例研究报道了径路复发,即甲状腺组织或病变沿手术入路植入。本系统性综述旨在回顾远程入路甲状腺切除术后轨迹复发的病例:方法:使用PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Google Scholar进行了全面的文献检索,以确定截至2024年6月有关内镜或机器人甲状腺切除术后径路复发的病例报告。数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、初次手术和诊断的细节、复发检测的方法和时间以及管理策略:搜索结果:共搜索到1578篇文章,其中包括17篇病例报告,共18名患者。患者(16 名女性和 2 名男性)的平均年龄为 34.6 ± 14.9 岁。最初肿瘤的平均大小为 3.9 ± 1.2 厘米,诊断为 8 例癌症和 10 例良性病变。最初的手术包括12次内窥镜手术和6次机器人手术。轨道复发最常通过可触及的结节发现,其次是常规影像学检查和血清Tg水平升高。初次手术与复发之间的间隔时间从3个月到8年不等。处理方法从手术切除和放射性碘治疗到密切观察不等。除一例外,其他病例术后均未再复发:结论:远端入路甲状腺切除术后的追踪复发虽然罕见,但意义重大。正确的手术技巧、谨慎处理甲状腺组织以及严格的术后监测对于最大限度地降低这一风险至关重要。认识并及时处理轨道复发可能会带来良好的预后。
{"title":"Track recurrence after remote-access thyroid surgeries: A systematic review.","authors":"Moon Young Oh, Young Jun Chai","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12361","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote-access thyroidectomies have gained popularity, but track recurrence, which is the implantation of thyroid tissue or lesions along the surgical access route, has been reported in case studies. This systematic review aims to review cases of track recurrence following remote-access thyroidectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify case reports on track recurrence after endoscopic or robotic thyroidectomy up to June 2024. Data included patient demographics, details of the initial surgery and diagnosis, methods and timing of recurrence detection, and management strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 1578 articles, of which 17 case reports comprising 18 patients were included. The patients (16 females and two males) had a mean age of 34.6 ± 14.9 years. The mean size of initial tumors was 3.9 ± 1.2 cm, with diagnoses of eight cancers and 10 benign lesions. The initial surgeries included 12 endoscopic and six robotic procedures. Track recurrence was most often detected by palpable nodules followed by routine imaging and elevated serum Tg levels. The interval between initial surgery and recurrence ranged from 3 months to 8 years. Management varied from surgical resection and radioactive iodine therapy to close observation. There were no further recurrences in all but one case postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Track recurrence after remote-access thyroidectomy is rare but significant. Proper surgical techniques, careful handling of thyroid tissue, and rigorous postoperative monitoring are essential to minimize this risk. Awareness and prompt management of track recurrence may lead to favorable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Desarda versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Desarda 与 Lichtenstein 腹股沟疝修补术:随机对照试验荟萃分析。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12360
Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Eric Pasqualotto, Patrícia Marcolin, Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Ana Gabriela Ponte Farias, Beatriz D'Andrea Pigossi, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo

Background: The Lichtenstein technique is the gold standard for adult open inguinal hernia repair with mesh. The Desarda technique emerged in 2001 as a novel, promising non-mesh technique that has demonstrated low recurrence and postoperative complications.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCT) published until April 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics, with p-values <0.10 and I2>25% considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the R software, version 4.1.2.

Results: Eighteen RCTs comprising 1756 patients were included, of whom 861 (49%) were submitted to Desarda and 895 (51%) were submitted to Lichtenstein. Desarda was associated with lower seroma rates (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.89; and p = 0.014), less operative time (MD -8.6 min; 95% CI -14.5 to -2.8; and p < 0.01), lower postoperative pain on day one (MD -1.3 VAS score; 95% CI -2.3 to -0.3; p < 0.01) or chronic pain (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.88; and p = 0.028), and faster return-to-work activities (MD -2.1 days; 95% CI -3.7 to -0.6; and p < 0.01). The recurrence rate was 1.4% for Desarda versus 2.1% for Lichtenstein, with no statistical difference between techniques.

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, Desarda significantly decreases seroma operative time, postoperative pain on day 1, chronic pain, and return-to-work activities.

背景:Lichtenstein 技术是使用网片进行成人腹股沟疝修补术的金标准。2001 年出现的 Desarda 技术是一种新型、有前途的无网片技术,其复发率和术后并发症都很低:我们检索了 MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials 和 Embase 中截至 2024 年 4 月发表的随机对照试验 (RCT)。采用随机效应模型对带有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的比值比 (OR) 进行了汇总。异质性采用 Cochran's Q 检验和 I2 统计法进行评估,P 值 2>25% 为显著性。统计分析使用 4.1.2 版 R 软件进行:共纳入18项研究,1756名患者,其中861人(49%)接受了Desarda治疗,895人(51%)接受了Lichtenstein治疗。Desarda 与较低的血清肿发生率(OR 0.55;95% CI 0.35-0.89;p = 0.014)、较短的手术时间(MD -8.6分钟;95% CI -14.5--2.8;p 结论:在这项荟萃分析中,Desarda 能显著减少血清肿手术时间、术后第 1 天的疼痛、慢性疼痛和重返工作岗位的活动。
{"title":"Desarda versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Eric Pasqualotto, Patrícia Marcolin, Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Ana Gabriela Ponte Farias, Beatriz D'Andrea Pigossi, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Lichtenstein technique is the gold standard for adult open inguinal hernia repair with mesh. The Desarda technique emerged in 2001 as a novel, promising non-mesh technique that has demonstrated low recurrence and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCT) published until April 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics, with p-values <0.10 and I<sup>2</sup>>25% considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the R software, version 4.1.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen RCTs comprising 1756 patients were included, of whom 861 (49%) were submitted to Desarda and 895 (51%) were submitted to Lichtenstein. Desarda was associated with lower seroma rates (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.89; and p = 0.014), less operative time (MD -8.6 min; 95% CI -14.5 to -2.8; and p < 0.01), lower postoperative pain on day one (MD -1.3 VAS score; 95% CI -2.3 to -0.3; p < 0.01) or chronic pain (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.88; and p = 0.028), and faster return-to-work activities (MD -2.1 days; 95% CI -3.7 to -0.6; and p < 0.01). The recurrence rate was 1.4% for Desarda versus 2.1% for Lichtenstein, with no statistical difference between techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis, Desarda significantly decreases seroma operative time, postoperative pain on day 1, chronic pain, and return-to-work activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Priority areas for outcomes improvement among older adults undergoing inpatient general surgery inclusive of geriatric-pertinent complications. 在接受住院普通外科手术(包括老年病相关并发症)的老年人中,改善疗效的优先领域。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12331
Hadiza S Kazaure, Kimberly S Johnson, Ronnie Rosenthal, Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan

Background: Comprehensive studies on priority areas for improving geriatric surgery outcomes, inclusive of geriatric-pertinent data, are limited.

Methods: The ACS NSQIP geriatric database (2014-2018) was used to abstract older adults (≥65 years) undergoing inpatient general surgery procedures. Thirty-day complication, functional decline, and mortality rates were analyzed, with a focus on two geriatric-pertinent complications: delirium and new/worsening pressure ulcers.

Results: There were 9062 patients; 41.9% were ≥75 years. Mean age was 73.9 years. The majority of patients were female (54.0%), White (77.7%), and had independent functional status before surgery (94.0%). Overall 30-day complication, functional decline, and mortality rates were 33.6%, 34.5%, and 3.5%, respectively; failure to the rescue rate was 9.7%. Including geriatric-pertinent complications increased the overall complication rate by 20.4%. Delirium emerged as the leading complication (11.9%), followed by bleeding (11.1%), and wound-related complications (10.1%); these three accounted for 53.7% of complications. Delirium and pressure ulcers were associated with a >50% rate of postoperative functional decline (52.0% and 71.4%, respectively); pressure ulcers were also notable for a 25.5% failure to the rescue rate. Both were also among complications most likely to occur following the 3 most common procedures (colorectal surgery, pancreatic resections, and exploratory laparotomy), which overall accounted for approximately 79.6% of complications, 73.4% of patients experiencing functional decline, and 82.3% of mortality.

Conclusions: Delirium is the leading complication among older adults undergoing inpatient surgery. Overall, a small number of complications and procedure groups account for most surgical morbidity and mortality among older adults and thus constitute priority areas for outcomes improvement.

背景:有关改善老年外科手术结果的优先领域(包括老年病相关数据)的综合研究十分有限:方法:使用 ACS NSQIP 老年数据库(2014-2018 年)抽取接受住院普通外科手术的老年人(≥65 岁)。对30天并发症、功能衰退和死亡率进行分析,重点关注两种与老年病相关的并发症:谵妄和新发/恶化的压疮:共有 9062 名患者;41.9% 的患者年龄≥75 岁。平均年龄为 73.9 岁。大多数患者为女性(54.0%)、白人(77.7%),术前功能独立(94.0%)。30 天的总体并发症发生率、功能下降率和死亡率分别为 33.6%、34.5% 和 3.5%;抢救失败率为 9.7%。纳入老年病相关并发症后,总并发症发生率增加了 20.4%。谵妄是最主要的并发症(11.9%),其次是出血(11.1%)和伤口相关并发症(10.1%);这三者占并发症的 53.7%。谵妄和压疮与术后功能衰退率超过 50% 相关(分别为 52.0% 和 71.4%);压疮的抢救失败率也高达 25.5%。这两种并发症也是最常见的三种手术(结直肠手术、胰腺切除术和探查性开腹手术)后最容易出现的并发症,总计约占并发症的79.6%、功能衰退患者的73.4%和死亡率的82.3%:谵妄是老年人接受住院手术的主要并发症。总体而言,少数并发症和手术组别是老年人手术发病率和死亡率的主要原因,因此是改善手术效果的优先领域。
{"title":"Priority areas for outcomes improvement among older adults undergoing inpatient general surgery inclusive of geriatric-pertinent complications.","authors":"Hadiza S Kazaure, Kimberly S Johnson, Ronnie Rosenthal, Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive studies on priority areas for improving geriatric surgery outcomes, inclusive of geriatric-pertinent data, are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ACS NSQIP geriatric database (2014-2018) was used to abstract older adults (≥65 years) undergoing inpatient general surgery procedures. Thirty-day complication, functional decline, and mortality rates were analyzed, with a focus on two geriatric-pertinent complications: delirium and new/worsening pressure ulcers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 9062 patients; 41.9% were ≥75 years. Mean age was 73.9 years. The majority of patients were female (54.0%), White (77.7%), and had independent functional status before surgery (94.0%). Overall 30-day complication, functional decline, and mortality rates were 33.6%, 34.5%, and 3.5%, respectively; failure to the rescue rate was 9.7%. Including geriatric-pertinent complications increased the overall complication rate by 20.4%. Delirium emerged as the leading complication (11.9%), followed by bleeding (11.1%), and wound-related complications (10.1%); these three accounted for 53.7% of complications. Delirium and pressure ulcers were associated with a >50% rate of postoperative functional decline (52.0% and 71.4%, respectively); pressure ulcers were also notable for a 25.5% failure to the rescue rate. Both were also among complications most likely to occur following the 3 most common procedures (colorectal surgery, pancreatic resections, and exploratory laparotomy), which overall accounted for approximately 79.6% of complications, 73.4% of patients experiencing functional decline, and 82.3% of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delirium is the leading complication among older adults undergoing inpatient surgery. Overall, a small number of complications and procedure groups account for most surgical morbidity and mortality among older adults and thus constitute priority areas for outcomes improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of appendicectomy one year after antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis: Insights from a prospective, multicentre, observational study. 急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗一年后进行阑尾切除术的预测因素:一项前瞻性多中心观察研究的启示。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12337
Hannah Javanmard-Emamghissi, Brett Doleman, Jonathan N Lund, Marianne Hollyman, Susan J Moug, Gillian M Tierney

Background: Surgeons are sometimes reluctant to manage uncomplicated appendicitis non-operatively. Reasons cited include the risk of recurrent appendicitis and the risk of missed appendiceal malignancy. The aim of this study was to address these uncertainties and determine the long-term efficacy of antibiotic versus operative management of appendicitis.

Method: One-year follow-up of patients enrolled in the multicentre, COVID:HAREM cohort study during March-June 2020 was performed. Initial operative or non-operative management was determined on a case-by-case basis by the responsible surgeon. Outcomes were appendicectomy rate at 1-year, histology of removed appendix and predictors of unsuccessful antibiotic treatment.

Results: A total of 625 patients who had non-operative management were included. Emergency appendicectomy had been performed by 1-year in 24% (149/625), with a median time to appendicectomy of 12 days [IQR 1-77] from presentation. Thirty-one patients had elective appendicectomy. Normal histology was reported in 6% of emergency procedures and 58% of elective ones. There were 7 malignancies and 3 neuroendocrine tumors identified at histology. All patients with malignant histology had ≥1 risk factors for malignancy at initial presentation. Faecolithiasis (hazard ratios (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.51-3.49) and a high Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS >16; HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.52-3.92) were independent risk factors for unsuccessful non-operative management.

Conclusion: At 1 year, 71% of patients managed non-operatively did not undergo an appendicectomy. Recurrence of appendicitis was associated with faecolithiasis and a high AAS. Patients at higher risk for appendiceal malignancy should have targeted follow-up. These factors should be considered when counseling patients on non-operative management.

背景:外科医生有时不愿对无并发症的阑尾炎进行非手术治疗。原因包括阑尾炎复发的风险和漏诊阑尾恶性肿瘤的风险。本研究旨在解决这些不确定因素,并确定抗生素与手术治疗阑尾炎的长期疗效:方法:对 2020 年 3 月至 6 月期间加入 COVID:HAREM 多中心队列研究的患者进行为期一年的随访。最初的手术或非手术治疗由负责的外科医生根据具体情况决定。研究结果包括1年阑尾切除率、切除阑尾的组织学特征以及抗生素治疗失败的预测因素:结果:共纳入了 625 名接受非手术治疗的患者。24%的患者(149/625)在1年后进行了急诊阑尾切除术,阑尾切除术的中位时间为就诊后12天[IQR 1-77]。31名患者接受了选择性阑尾切除术。6%的急诊手术和58%的择期手术报告组织学正常。组织学检查发现了 7 例恶性肿瘤和 3 例神经内分泌肿瘤。所有恶性组织学病例在初次就诊时都有≥1个恶性肿瘤风险因素。粪石症(危险比(HR)2.3,95% 置信区间(CI)1.51-3.49)和成人阑尾炎评分高(AAS >16;HR 2.44,95% CI 1.52-3.92)是非手术治疗不成功的独立危险因素:结论:1年后,71%的非手术治疗患者没有接受阑尾切除术。阑尾炎复发与粪结石和高 AAS 有关。阑尾恶性肿瘤风险较高的患者应进行有针对性的随访。在指导患者进行非手术治疗时,应考虑这些因素。
{"title":"Predictors of appendicectomy one year after antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis: Insights from a prospective, multicentre, observational study.","authors":"Hannah Javanmard-Emamghissi, Brett Doleman, Jonathan N Lund, Marianne Hollyman, Susan J Moug, Gillian M Tierney","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons are sometimes reluctant to manage uncomplicated appendicitis non-operatively. Reasons cited include the risk of recurrent appendicitis and the risk of missed appendiceal malignancy. The aim of this study was to address these uncertainties and determine the long-term efficacy of antibiotic versus operative management of appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One-year follow-up of patients enrolled in the multicentre, COVID:HAREM cohort study during March-June 2020 was performed. Initial operative or non-operative management was determined on a case-by-case basis by the responsible surgeon. Outcomes were appendicectomy rate at 1-year, histology of removed appendix and predictors of unsuccessful antibiotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 625 patients who had non-operative management were included. Emergency appendicectomy had been performed by 1-year in 24% (149/625), with a median time to appendicectomy of 12 days [IQR 1-77] from presentation. Thirty-one patients had elective appendicectomy. Normal histology was reported in 6% of emergency procedures and 58% of elective ones. There were 7 malignancies and 3 neuroendocrine tumors identified at histology. All patients with malignant histology had ≥1 risk factors for malignancy at initial presentation. Faecolithiasis (hazard ratios (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.51-3.49) and a high Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS >16; HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.52-3.92) were independent risk factors for unsuccessful non-operative management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At 1 year, 71% of patients managed non-operatively did not undergo an appendicectomy. Recurrence of appendicitis was associated with faecolithiasis and a high AAS. Patients at higher risk for appendiceal malignancy should have targeted follow-up. These factors should be considered when counseling patients on non-operative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: Is routine histopathological analysis of hemorrhoidectomy specimens necessary? A systematic review and meta-analysis. 评论痔切除术标本的常规组织病理学分析有必要吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12358
Aytekin Unlu, Ali Kagan Coskun
{"title":"Comment on: Is routine histopathological analysis of hemorrhoidectomy specimens necessary? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Aytekin Unlu, Ali Kagan Coskun","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12358","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global partnerships for quality improvement: A step toward a better future for trauma care in low- and middle-income countries. 为提高质量建立全球伙伴关系:迈向中低收入国家创伤护理更美好未来的一步。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12351
David N Naumann
{"title":"Global partnerships for quality improvement: A step toward a better future for trauma care in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"David N Naumann","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12351","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
World Journal of Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1