Background: Laparoscopic surgery has gradually gained acceptance for abdominal surgical emergencies; however, limited reports exist on laparoscopic surgery for strangulated small bowel obstruction (SSBO). We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for SSBO.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, patients who underwent emergency surgery for SSBO between January 2014 and December 2024 were included and divided into laparoscopy and open groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the primary outcomes-intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes-between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with the conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery as secondary outcomes.
Results: A total of 123 patients were included in this study, of whom 39 (31.7%) were assigned to the laparoscopy group. After PSM, the overall rate of the Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications was significantly lower in the laparoscopy than the open group (7.4% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.036). Of the 39 patients in the laparoscopy group, 10 (25.6%) were converted from laparoscopic to open surgery. The number of previous laparotomies (odds ratio: 4.036, 95% confidence interval: 1.189-13.701, and p = 0.025) and a history of gastrointestinal surgery (odds ratio: 6.125, 95% confidence interval: 1.263-29.699, and p = 0.024) were identified as factors significantly associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery in patients with SSBO.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that laparoscopic surgery for SSBO is beneficial for reducing the occurrence of postoperative complications. However, laparoscopic surgery should be performed in patients with a history of multiple laparotomies or gastrointestinal surgery, considering the possibility of conversion to open surgery.
背景:腹腔镜手术已逐渐被腹部外科急诊所接受;然而,关于腹腔镜手术治疗绞窄性小肠梗阻(SSBO)的报道有限。我们的目的是证明腹腔镜手术治疗SSBO的有效性和可行性。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究,选取2014年1月至2024年12月间行SSBO急诊手术的患者,分为腹腔镜组和开放组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较两组间的主要结果——术中和术后短期结果。Logistic回归分析用于确定与从腹腔镜手术转为开放手术相关的因素作为次要结果。结果:本研究共纳入123例患者,其中腹腔镜组39例(31.7%)。PSM后,腹腔镜组Clavien-Dindo级≥II级术后并发症总体发生率明显低于开放组(7.4% vs 29.6%, p = 0.036)。在腹腔镜组的39例患者中,10例(25.6%)由腹腔镜手术转为开放手术。既往剖腹手术次数(优势比:4.036,95%可信区间:1.189-13.701,p = 0.025)和胃肠手术史(优势比:6.125,95%可信区间:1.263-29.699,p = 0.024)被确定为SSBO患者由腹腔镜转开腹手术的显著相关因素。结论:腹腔镜下手术治疗SSBO有利于减少术后并发症的发生。然而,对于有多次剖腹手术或胃肠手术史的患者,应考虑到转开的可能性,进行腹腔镜手术。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Toshimichi Kobayashi, Ryota Suda, Hiroki Yamaguchi, Shoma Iida, Kanami Iwama, Takumi Seichi, Yoshihiro Nagae, Hiroyuki Higuchi, Akitoshi Ando, Itsuki Koganezawa, Masashi Nakagawa, Kei Yokozuka, Shigeto Ochiai, Takahiro Gunji, Toru Sano, Satoshi Tabuchi, Naokazu Chiba, Shigeyuki Kawachi","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery has gradually gained acceptance for abdominal surgical emergencies; however, limited reports exist on laparoscopic surgery for strangulated small bowel obstruction (SSBO). We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for SSBO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study, patients who underwent emergency surgery for SSBO between January 2014 and December 2024 were included and divided into laparoscopy and open groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the primary outcomes-intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes-between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with the conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 patients were included in this study, of whom 39 (31.7%) were assigned to the laparoscopy group. After PSM, the overall rate of the Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications was significantly lower in the laparoscopy than the open group (7.4% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.036). Of the 39 patients in the laparoscopy group, 10 (25.6%) were converted from laparoscopic to open surgery. The number of previous laparotomies (odds ratio: 4.036, 95% confidence interval: 1.189-13.701, and p = 0.025) and a history of gastrointestinal surgery (odds ratio: 6.125, 95% confidence interval: 1.263-29.699, and p = 0.024) were identified as factors significantly associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery in patients with SSBO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that laparoscopic surgery for SSBO is beneficial for reducing the occurrence of postoperative complications. However, laparoscopic surgery should be performed in patients with a history of multiple laparotomies or gastrointestinal surgery, considering the possibility of conversion to open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146107677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica K Liu, Xane D Peters, Sarah L Remer, Amanda J Reich, Zara Cooper, Clifford Y Ko
Background: A growing number of emergency general surgery (EGS) admissions comprise of adults age 65 years and older, who are more likely to experience missed or delayed diagnoses, and subsequently worse postoperative outcomes. We aimed to ascertain the perspectives of clinicians on the diagnostic challenges unique to older adults with EGS conditions and strategies to improve feedback.
Methods: In this qualitative study, semi-structured focus groups were conducted with frontline clinicians with experience in providing high volume care to older adult EGS patients to explore diagnostic challenges, tools, and feedback strategies. Questions focused on clinical gaps and approaches, tools, and the mechanisms in place to provide feedback on patient diagnosis and assessment. Focus groups were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using an inductive approach.
Results: Twenty-two clinicians participated in one of six focus groups. Clinicians reported three key diagnostic challenges: nontextbook presentations, comorbidities, and older-age specific complications. Nondiagnostic factors remained high priorities including functional health status, patient preferences, family involvement, and health related social needs. Practical tools addressing these gaps included the use of multidisciplinary expertise, surgical risk calculators, cognitive assessments, functional health assessments, and protocols guiding goals of care discussions. Participants shared barriers and facilitators for implementation of these tools.
Conclusion: Frontline clinicians identified several high priority considerations unique in EGS for older adults. To address these, context-specific tools and strategies were detailed and inform ongoing work to incorporate feedback and solutions into frontline settings. Future work in quality improvement should incorporate these high priority areas into existing quality improvement frameworks.
{"title":"Exploring Diagnostic Challenges and Performance Feedback in Older Adult Emergency General Surgery.","authors":"Jessica K Liu, Xane D Peters, Sarah L Remer, Amanda J Reich, Zara Cooper, Clifford Y Ko","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A growing number of emergency general surgery (EGS) admissions comprise of adults age 65 years and older, who are more likely to experience missed or delayed diagnoses, and subsequently worse postoperative outcomes. We aimed to ascertain the perspectives of clinicians on the diagnostic challenges unique to older adults with EGS conditions and strategies to improve feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, semi-structured focus groups were conducted with frontline clinicians with experience in providing high volume care to older adult EGS patients to explore diagnostic challenges, tools, and feedback strategies. Questions focused on clinical gaps and approaches, tools, and the mechanisms in place to provide feedback on patient diagnosis and assessment. Focus groups were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using an inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two clinicians participated in one of six focus groups. Clinicians reported three key diagnostic challenges: nontextbook presentations, comorbidities, and older-age specific complications. Nondiagnostic factors remained high priorities including functional health status, patient preferences, family involvement, and health related social needs. Practical tools addressing these gaps included the use of multidisciplinary expertise, surgical risk calculators, cognitive assessments, functional health assessments, and protocols guiding goals of care discussions. Participants shared barriers and facilitators for implementation of these tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frontline clinicians identified several high priority considerations unique in EGS for older adults. To address these, context-specific tools and strategies were detailed and inform ongoing work to incorporate feedback and solutions into frontline settings. Future work in quality improvement should incorporate these high priority areas into existing quality improvement frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maryrose O Osazuwa, Vernon Mark Gacii, Hazel Mumphansha
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Current Landscape of Children's Surgery in Africa: A Multicenter Analysis of 16,000 Cases.","authors":"Maryrose O Osazuwa, Vernon Mark Gacii, Hazel Mumphansha","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70250","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Clarifying a Condition Cloaked in Confusion and Controversy: Functional Gallbladder Disorder.","authors":"Xiaolong Li, Steven C Cunningham","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70229","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yequan Xie, Guangyu Zhong, Bin Yang, Fanghai Han, Shengning Zhou, Jianan Tan
Background: PANP has been applied in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer resection, significantly reducing the incidence of genitourinary dysfunction; however, it has not eliminated sexual and urinary dysfunction. Prospective trials focusing on genitourinary function as a primary outcome are rare. To confirm the protective effect on sexual and urinary function in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (PANP), and explore the risk factor of postoperative sexual dysfunction.
Methods: A prospective, single-center, single-arm trial was conducted on male patients with rectal adenocarcinoma suitable for laparoscopic surgery with PANP at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Patients with normal genitourinary function were included, and the primary outcome was the change in sexual function 6 months after the operation.
Results: Of 91 patients enrolled, 70 underwent a laparoscopic operation. Six months after the operation, 5 patients were lost to follow-up, and the IIEF-5 and IPSS scores were 22.85 ± 3.66 versus 24.10 ± 1.21 (p = 0.003) and 2.11 ± 2.06 versus 1.89 ± 1.86 (p = 0.018), respectively, compared with preoperative values. Five patients (7.69%) suffered from sexual disorders, and 2 patients (3.08%) developed moderate urinary dysfunction. The majority of the autonomic nerve system was visible and preserved intraoperatively. Quality of TME was complete in 94.29% (66/70) and partially complete in 5.71% (4/70) of patients, respectively. Positive CRM in this study was 2.86% (2/70), and positive distal resection margin was 1.43% (1/70). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.80 ± 2.44 days. Surgical procedure, distance of tumor to AV, clinical TNM stage, nCRT, stoma, and completeness of the autonomic nervous system were risk factors of postoperative sexual dysfunction in univariate analysis; however, none of them was an independent risk factor in multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: PANP in laparoscopic radical rectal resection effectively preserves sexual and urinary function without compromising oncological outcomes. It is safe and feasible in high-flow centers and for experienced surgeons.
{"title":"Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Resection With Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation in Males: A Prospective Single-Center Study.","authors":"Yequan Xie, Guangyu Zhong, Bin Yang, Fanghai Han, Shengning Zhou, Jianan Tan","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PANP has been applied in laparoscopic radical rectal cancer resection, significantly reducing the incidence of genitourinary dysfunction; however, it has not eliminated sexual and urinary dysfunction. Prospective trials focusing on genitourinary function as a primary outcome are rare. To confirm the protective effect on sexual and urinary function in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (PANP), and explore the risk factor of postoperative sexual dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center, single-arm trial was conducted on male patients with rectal adenocarcinoma suitable for laparoscopic surgery with PANP at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Patients with normal genitourinary function were included, and the primary outcome was the change in sexual function 6 months after the operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 patients enrolled, 70 underwent a laparoscopic operation. Six months after the operation, 5 patients were lost to follow-up, and the IIEF-5 and IPSS scores were 22.85 ± 3.66 versus 24.10 ± 1.21 (p = 0.003) and 2.11 ± 2.06 versus 1.89 ± 1.86 (p = 0.018), respectively, compared with preoperative values. Five patients (7.69%) suffered from sexual disorders, and 2 patients (3.08%) developed moderate urinary dysfunction. The majority of the autonomic nerve system was visible and preserved intraoperatively. Quality of TME was complete in 94.29% (66/70) and partially complete in 5.71% (4/70) of patients, respectively. Positive CRM in this study was 2.86% (2/70), and positive distal resection margin was 1.43% (1/70). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.80 ± 2.44 days. Surgical procedure, distance of tumor to AV, clinical TNM stage, nCRT, stoma, and completeness of the autonomic nervous system were risk factors of postoperative sexual dysfunction in univariate analysis; however, none of them was an independent risk factor in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PANP in laparoscopic radical rectal resection effectively preserves sexual and urinary function without compromising oncological outcomes. It is safe and feasible in high-flow centers and for experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ghadeer Olleik, Hiba Elhaj, Samin Shirzadi, Francesca Fermi, Maxime Lapointe-Gagner, Sender Liberman, Mohsen Alhashemi, Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh, Fatemeh Rajabiyazdi, Nawar Touma, Pepa Kaneva, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar, Badma Bashankaev, Alexandra Sidorova, Stephen J Chapman, Chuan-Gang Fu, Lucia Oliveira, Sofia Valanci, Audrius Dulskas, Steven Wexner, Lawrence Lee, Liane S Feldman, Marylise Boutros, Julio F Fiore
Background: Excessive opioid prescribing after colorectal surgery can lead to adverse events and contribute to the opioid crisis. Understanding international prescribing patterns is essential for guiding practice and future research. The Analgesia After Colorectal Surgery (ACORE) survey aimed to characterize international opioid prescribing practices after elective colorectal resection.
Method: This international cross-sectional survey followed established methodological guidelines. Eligible participants were colorectal, gastrointestinal, and general surgeons, as well as surgery trainees. Recruitment followed snowball sampling via international surgical societies' mailing lists, social media, and personal networks. The primary outcome of interest was post-discharge opioid prescribing after open and MIS elective colorectal resection. Secondary outcomes included prescription quantity in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression with Bayesian model averaging.
Results: Among 817 participants, 88% were surgeons, 12% were trainees, 62% practiced in academic hospitals, and 67% had over 5 years in practice. Overall, 57% of the participants reported prescribing opioids at discharge (55% after open and 54% after minimally invasive procedures). Opioids were commonly prescribed by surgeons practicing in Australia and New Zealand (100%), Northern America (92%), Northern Europe (68%), and South-eastern Asia (71%). In contrast, they were less frequently prescribed in Eastern Europe (11%), Eastern Asia (22%), Latin America and the Caribbean (26%), Southern Europe (19%), and Northern Africa (0%). The median quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge varied widely (30-200 MMEs). In regression analysis accounting for surgeon and practice characteristics, region of practice was the only factor independently associated with opioid prescribing.
Conclusion: The extensive global variation in opioid prescribing underscores clinical equipoise and challenges the assumption that post-discharge opioids are universally necessary for patients undergoing colorectal resection.
{"title":"Post-Discharge Opioid Prescribing After Elective Colorectal Resection: An International Survey.","authors":"Ghadeer Olleik, Hiba Elhaj, Samin Shirzadi, Francesca Fermi, Maxime Lapointe-Gagner, Sender Liberman, Mohsen Alhashemi, Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh, Fatemeh Rajabiyazdi, Nawar Touma, Pepa Kaneva, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar, Badma Bashankaev, Alexandra Sidorova, Stephen J Chapman, Chuan-Gang Fu, Lucia Oliveira, Sofia Valanci, Audrius Dulskas, Steven Wexner, Lawrence Lee, Liane S Feldman, Marylise Boutros, Julio F Fiore","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive opioid prescribing after colorectal surgery can lead to adverse events and contribute to the opioid crisis. Understanding international prescribing patterns is essential for guiding practice and future research. The Analgesia After Colorectal Surgery (ACORE) survey aimed to characterize international opioid prescribing practices after elective colorectal resection.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This international cross-sectional survey followed established methodological guidelines. Eligible participants were colorectal, gastrointestinal, and general surgeons, as well as surgery trainees. Recruitment followed snowball sampling via international surgical societies' mailing lists, social media, and personal networks. The primary outcome of interest was post-discharge opioid prescribing after open and MIS elective colorectal resection. Secondary outcomes included prescription quantity in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression with Bayesian model averaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 817 participants, 88% were surgeons, 12% were trainees, 62% practiced in academic hospitals, and 67% had over 5 years in practice. Overall, 57% of the participants reported prescribing opioids at discharge (55% after open and 54% after minimally invasive procedures). Opioids were commonly prescribed by surgeons practicing in Australia and New Zealand (100%), Northern America (92%), Northern Europe (68%), and South-eastern Asia (71%). In contrast, they were less frequently prescribed in Eastern Europe (11%), Eastern Asia (22%), Latin America and the Caribbean (26%), Southern Europe (19%), and Northern Africa (0%). The median quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge varied widely (30-200 MMEs). In regression analysis accounting for surgeon and practice characteristics, region of practice was the only factor independently associated with opioid prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The extensive global variation in opioid prescribing underscores clinical equipoise and challenges the assumption that post-discharge opioids are universally necessary for patients undergoing colorectal resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Betelehem M Asnake, Maziar M Nourian, Ana M Crawford, Bantayehu Sileshi, Sheida Tabaie
{"title":"Roadmap to Creating a Global Health Equity Training Program Within US Anesthesiology Residency Programs.","authors":"Betelehem M Asnake, Maziar M Nourian, Ana M Crawford, Bantayehu Sileshi, Sheida Tabaie","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70212","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146054027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xiaolong Huang, Fengkai Xu, Tao Cheng, Huiqin Yang, Chunlai Lu, Teng Ma, Lin Wang, Di Ge
Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a heterogeneous group with varied patterns of disease. The skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis is quite frequent and a prognostic factor for patients with N2 lung cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical significance and prognostic value of a new N2 descriptor based on skip N2 disease and ninth edition N2 classification.
Methods: A retrospective review of 533 patients with stage pN2 NSCLC was undertaken. Patients were finally classified into three categories (skip N2a, skip N2b/nonskip N2a, and nonskip N2b). The clinic characteristics, survival outcomes, and metastasis pattern were analyzed among groups.
Results: Significant prognostic differences were found between patients of subdivided N2 descriptor (skip N2a vs. skip N2b/nonskip N2a and p < 0.001 for both OS and DFS and skip N2b/nonskip N2a vs. nonskip N2b, p = 0.037 for OS and p = 0.029 for DFS). Better prognostic value in predicting survival, including a smaller Akaike Information Criterion value and a higher Harrell C-index, was observed for the new N2 descriptor relative to the ninth edition N2 classification. Skip patients had better survival outcomes and different lymph node metastasis pattern compared with nonskip patients.
Conclusions: When compared to the ninth N2 classification, the new N2 descriptor could be a more reliable and accurate prognostic determinant, which is worth considering in the revision of the current tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system.
背景:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者是一个异质性群体,具有不同的疾病模式。跳跃性纵隔淋巴结转移是N2型肺癌患者预后的重要因素。本研究的目的是评估基于跳过N2疾病和第九版N2分类的新N2描述符的临床意义和预后价值。方法:对533例pN2期NSCLC患者进行回顾性分析。最终将患者分为跳过N2a、跳过N2b/非跳过N2a和非跳过N2b三类。分析各组患者的临床特点、生存结局及转移模式。结果:细分N2描述符(skip N2a vs. skip N2b/nonskip N2a和p)患者的预后存在显著差异。结论:与第九种N2分类相比,新的N2描述符可能是一个更可靠和准确的预后决定因素,值得在现行肿瘤、淋巴结和转移(TNM)分期系统的修订中考虑。
{"title":"A New N2 Descriptor for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Classification Based on Skip Metastasis and the Number of N2 Station Involvement.","authors":"Xiaolong Huang, Fengkai Xu, Tao Cheng, Huiqin Yang, Chunlai Lu, Teng Ma, Lin Wang, Di Ge","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a heterogeneous group with varied patterns of disease. The skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis is quite frequent and a prognostic factor for patients with N2 lung cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical significance and prognostic value of a new N2 descriptor based on skip N2 disease and ninth edition N2 classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 533 patients with stage pN2 NSCLC was undertaken. Patients were finally classified into three categories (skip N2a, skip N2b/nonskip N2a, and nonskip N2b). The clinic characteristics, survival outcomes, and metastasis pattern were analyzed among groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant prognostic differences were found between patients of subdivided N2 descriptor (skip N2a vs. skip N2b/nonskip N2a and p < 0.001 for both OS and DFS and skip N2b/nonskip N2a vs. nonskip N2b, p = 0.037 for OS and p = 0.029 for DFS). Better prognostic value in predicting survival, including a smaller Akaike Information Criterion value and a higher Harrell C-index, was observed for the new N2 descriptor relative to the ninth edition N2 classification. Skip patients had better survival outcomes and different lymph node metastasis pattern compared with nonskip patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When compared to the ninth N2 classification, the new N2 descriptor could be a more reliable and accurate prognostic determinant, which is worth considering in the revision of the current tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Postoperative morbidity remains a significant concern following the surgical treatment of pediatric liver hydatid disease, particularly in endemic regions. The aim of this study was to identify independent predictors of postoperative morbidity in pediatric liver hydatid disease in order to improve preoperative risk assessment.
Methods: This retrospective observational study included consecutive pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for liver hydatid disease at Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia, between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2025. Postoperative morbidity was defined as any complication occurring within 30 days after surgery.
Results: A total of 117 children were included. The median age was 8 years, with a nearly equal sex distribution (59 males and 58 females). The median Sun Pediatric Comorbidity Index (SPCI) was 1 [IQR, 0-2]. The mean cyst size was 8 ± 2.4 cm, with right lobe involvement observed in 83 patients (70.9%). Concomitant extrahepatic hydatid disease was identified in 23 children (19.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in 25 patients (21.4%). In multivariate analysis, three factors were independently associated with postoperative morbidity: SPCI ≥ 3 (OR 5.748, 95% CI 1.696-19.482; p = 0.005), cyst size > 8 cm (OR 5.020, 95% CI 1.172-21.513; p = 0.030), and concomitant extrahepatic hydatid disease (OR 6.355, 95% CI 1.710-23.620; p = 0.006).
Conclusion: Postoperative morbidity after pediatric liver hydatid surgery remains frequent. Beyond cyst size, pediatric comorbidity burden and multisite hydatid disease emerge as novel and independent predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes.
背景:小儿肝包虫病手术治疗后的术后发病率仍然是一个值得关注的问题,特别是在流行地区。本研究的目的是确定儿童肝包虫病术后发病率的独立预测因素,以改善术前风险评估。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了2010年7月1日至2025年6月30日期间在突尼斯Sfax Hedi Chaker大学医院接受肝包虫病手术治疗的连续儿科患者。术后发病率定义为术后30天内发生的任何并发症。结果:共纳入117例患儿。中位年龄为8岁,性别分布几乎相等(男性59岁,女性58岁)。小儿合并症指数(SPCI)中位数为1 [IQR, 0-2]。平均囊肿大小为8±2.4 cm,累及右肺叶83例(70.9%)。合并肝外包虫病23例(19.7%)。术后并发症25例(21.4%)。在多因素分析中,三个因素与术后发病率独立相关:SPCI≥3 (OR 5.748, 95% CI 1.696-19.482, p = 0.005)、囊肿大小bbb8 cm (OR 5.020, 95% CI 1.172-21.513, p = 0.030)、合并肝外包虫病(OR 6.355, 95% CI 1.710-23.620, p = 0.006)。结论:小儿肝包虫病术后发病率居高不下。除囊肿大小外,儿童合并症负担和多部位包虫病成为不良术后结果的新的独立预测因素。
{"title":"Predictors of Postoperative Morbidity in Pediatric Liver Hydatid Disease: Role of Comorbidities and Multisite Infection.","authors":"Mohamed Zouari, Oumaima Jarboui, Manel Belhajmansour, Manar Hbaieb, Asma Issaoui, Mahdi Ben Dhaou, Riadh Mhiri","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative morbidity remains a significant concern following the surgical treatment of pediatric liver hydatid disease, particularly in endemic regions. The aim of this study was to identify independent predictors of postoperative morbidity in pediatric liver hydatid disease in order to improve preoperative risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included consecutive pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for liver hydatid disease at Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia, between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2025. Postoperative morbidity was defined as any complication occurring within 30 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 children were included. The median age was 8 years, with a nearly equal sex distribution (59 males and 58 females). The median Sun Pediatric Comorbidity Index (SPCI) was 1 [IQR, 0-2]. The mean cyst size was 8 ± 2.4 cm, with right lobe involvement observed in 83 patients (70.9%). Concomitant extrahepatic hydatid disease was identified in 23 children (19.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in 25 patients (21.4%). In multivariate analysis, three factors were independently associated with postoperative morbidity: SPCI ≥ 3 (OR 5.748, 95% CI 1.696-19.482; p = 0.005), cyst size > 8 cm (OR 5.020, 95% CI 1.172-21.513; p = 0.030), and concomitant extrahepatic hydatid disease (OR 6.355, 95% CI 1.710-23.620; p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative morbidity after pediatric liver hydatid surgery remains frequent. Beyond cyst size, pediatric comorbidity burden and multisite hydatid disease emerge as novel and independent predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This clinical practice guideline from the Explosive Weapons Trauma Care Collective (EXTRACCT) group provides a review of current best practice for management of burn wounds in low-resource conflict settings. The vast majority of burn wounds occur in low-and middle-income countries and yet international consensus guidelines are largely based on highly resource-intensive practices utilized in high-income countries. The guideline provides recommendations for initial evaluation, including airway management and estimation of burn size, resuscitation strategies, wound care, and approaches to definitive surgical management.
{"title":"Explosive Weapons Trauma Care Collective (EXTRACCT) Blast Injury Clinical Practice Guideline: Burn Management in Low-Resource Settings.","authors":"Aron Egelko, Barclay Stewart, Eleanor Curtis, Kwesi Nsaful, Lisa Rae, Manish Yadav","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This clinical practice guideline from the Explosive Weapons Trauma Care Collective (EXTRACCT) group provides a review of current best practice for management of burn wounds in low-resource conflict settings. The vast majority of burn wounds occur in low-and middle-income countries and yet international consensus guidelines are largely based on highly resource-intensive practices utilized in high-income countries. The guideline provides recommendations for initial evaluation, including airway management and estimation of burn size, resuscitation strategies, wound care, and approaches to definitive surgical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}