Pub Date : 2019-06-21DOI: 10.20414/el-umdah.v2i1.903
A. Riyadi
Al-Qur’an merupakan salah satu media yang dijadikan Allah untuk berkomunikasi dengan hamba-Nya. Al-Qur’an memuat pesan-pesan yang di antaranya berupa perintah dan larangan baik secara langsung ataupun tidak langsung. Mengetahui pesan, dari siapa dan untuk siapa merupakan salah satu cara untuk memahami makna yang terkandung dalam pesan itu sendiri. Melalui pendekatan teori semiotika komunikasi, penulis mencoba menguraikan makna pesan yang terkandung dalam Al-Qur’an surat Al-Anfal, ayat ke-60. Kesimpulan dari artikel ini menyatakan bahwa dalam Al-Anfal ayat ke-60, Allah menyampaikan konsep bernegara, yaitu konsep menjaga kedaulatan dan keutuhan negara sehingga tercipta keamanan dan kenyamanan bagi semua warganya. Di samping itu juga Islam lebih menganjurkan pertahanan dari pada melakukan invansi dan itulah konsep perdamaian yang sempurna
{"title":"PENAFSIRAN SURAT AL-ANFAL AYAT KE-60 MELALUI PENDEKATAN SEMIOTIKA (Aplikasi Teori Semiotika Komunikasi Roman Jakobson)","authors":"A. Riyadi","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v2i1.903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v2i1.903","url":null,"abstract":"Al-Qur’an merupakan salah satu media yang dijadikan Allah untuk berkomunikasi dengan hamba-Nya. Al-Qur’an memuat pesan-pesan yang di antaranya berupa perintah dan larangan baik secara langsung ataupun tidak langsung. Mengetahui pesan, dari siapa dan untuk siapa merupakan salah satu cara untuk memahami makna yang terkandung dalam pesan itu sendiri. Melalui pendekatan teori semiotika komunikasi, penulis mencoba menguraikan makna pesan yang terkandung dalam Al-Qur’an surat Al-Anfal, ayat ke-60. Kesimpulan dari artikel ini menyatakan bahwa dalam Al-Anfal ayat ke-60, Allah menyampaikan konsep bernegara, yaitu konsep menjaga kedaulatan dan keutuhan negara sehingga tercipta keamanan dan kenyamanan bagi semua warganya. Di samping itu juga Islam lebih menganjurkan pertahanan dari pada melakukan invansi dan itulah konsep perdamaian yang sempurna","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131698158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-21DOI: 10.20414/el-umdah.v2i1.910
Abdul Rasyid Ridho
Tafsir al-Kasysya>f karya az-Zamakhsyari sebagai objek kajian dalam penulisan ini, karena tafsir ini merupakan salah satu kitab tafsir yang sangat menekankan aspek kebahasaan (morfologi) sebagai pendekatan dalam melakukan penafsiran. Kemudian tafsir ini pula sebagai tafsir yang penafsirannya bercorak rasional. Hal ini didasarkan karena bahasa Al-Qur’an memiliki fleksibilitas yang tinggi yang dapat dipahami secara rasional, baik secara tekstual maupun kontekstual dengan berbagai pendekatan, termasuk pendekatan kebahasaan. Aspek kebahasaan telah memainkan peranan yang cukup penting dalam penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Bahkan para ulama’ menetapakan syarat umum yang harus dikuasai oleh mufasir yaitu penguasaan kaidahkaidah kebahasaan.
{"title":"ANALISIS KAJIAN MORFOLOGI AZ-ZAMAKHSYARI DALAM TAFSI>R AL-KASYSYA>F","authors":"Abdul Rasyid Ridho","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v2i1.910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v2i1.910","url":null,"abstract":"Tafsir al-Kasysya>f karya az-Zamakhsyari sebagai objek kajian dalam penulisan ini, karena tafsir ini merupakan salah satu kitab tafsir yang sangat menekankan aspek kebahasaan (morfologi) sebagai pendekatan dalam melakukan penafsiran. Kemudian tafsir ini pula sebagai tafsir yang penafsirannya bercorak rasional. Hal ini didasarkan karena bahasa Al-Qur’an memiliki fleksibilitas yang tinggi yang dapat dipahami secara rasional, baik secara tekstual maupun kontekstual dengan berbagai pendekatan, termasuk pendekatan kebahasaan. Aspek kebahasaan telah memainkan peranan yang cukup penting dalam penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Bahkan para ulama’ menetapakan syarat umum yang harus dikuasai oleh mufasir yaitu penguasaan kaidahkaidah kebahasaan.","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129266266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.533
Bustami Saladin
This paper discusses the syûrâ in the Qur’an. Syrâr as a legal and political principle for humanity is understood that Islam considers it important to respect the majority opinion of people who are competent and have commendable integrity but are not justifed in violating the provisions of Allah SWT. The Qur’an considers the importance of community involvement in the problems faced in reality. The details of the pattern and the way it is submitted to each community because one community can be different from the other community in accordance with the context at hand
{"title":"PRINSIP MUSYAWARAH DALAM AL QUR’AN","authors":"Bustami Saladin","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.533","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the syûrâ in the Qur’an. Syrâr as a legal and political principle for humanity is understood that Islam considers it important to respect the majority opinion of people who are competent and have commendable integrity but are not justifed in violating the provisions of Allah SWT. The Qur’an considers the importance of community involvement in the problems faced in reality. The details of the pattern and the way it is submitted to each community because one community can be different from the other community in accordance with the context at hand","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131802123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.20414/EL-UMDAH.V1I2.550
Syamsul Wathani
Criticism in interpretation studies shows a new phase of the interpretation of the Qur’an in contemporary academic studies of the Qur’an. Muhammad Syahrur is a fgure who became the object of criticism for some of his renewed ideas in contemporary studies of the Qur’an which are packaged in hermeneutics. Mahir al-Munanjad passed his book al-iskâ liyat Qirâ ah and Salim al-Jabi, al-Qirâ ‘at al-Mu’â shirat. This article focuses on Al-Jabi thinking with analysis on critical points. Al-Jabi made anBacademic criticism of Syahrur’s study, especially in the pattern of the approach used by Syahrur. Al-Jabi offers textual-contextual criticisms of the Shahrur approach patterned on language and thematic-historical analysis, which are often not in the context of the verses of the Qur’an.
{"title":"KRITIK SALIM AL-JAbI ATAS HERMENEUTIKA MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR","authors":"Syamsul Wathani","doi":"10.20414/EL-UMDAH.V1I2.550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20414/EL-UMDAH.V1I2.550","url":null,"abstract":"Criticism in interpretation studies shows a new phase of the interpretation of the Qur’an in contemporary academic studies of the Qur’an. Muhammad Syahrur is a fgure who became the object of criticism for some of his renewed ideas in contemporary studies of the Qur’an which are packaged in hermeneutics. Mahir al-Munanjad passed his book al-iskâ liyat Qirâ ah and Salim al-Jabi, al-Qirâ ‘at al-Mu’â shirat. This article focuses on Al-Jabi thinking with analysis on critical points. Al-Jabi made anBacademic criticism of Syahrur’s study, especially in the pattern of the approach used by Syahrur. Al-Jabi offers textual-contextual criticisms of the Shahrur approach patterned on language and thematic-historical analysis, which are often not in the context of the verses of the Qur’an.","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123964507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.551
Abdul Rasyid Ridho
The main problem in this study is the existence of the verses Amtsâ l in the Qur’an especially those relating to the description of world life and its interpretation of several interpreters as an approach, as well as a description of human attitudes in addressing the life of the world. So that Amtsâ l as one of the sciences of the Qur’an as well as the method of the Qur’an in conveying messages, lessons, and wisdom and intent content in it. So on this basis, Amtsâ l isexpected to be able to provide an innovation as well as a method in a mental revolution towards the morals of both believers, infdels, and hypocrites, to be more aware of the beauty and pleasure of the world like a patamorgana that makes humans fall into the valley of destruction. Then the Qur’an as a guide for humans to get the salvation of the world and the hereafter
本研究的主要问题是《古兰经》中存在的 Amtsâ l 经文，特别是与描述世界生活有关的经文，以及几位解释者作为一种方法对其进行的解释，还有对人类处理世界生活态度的描述。因此，Amtsâ l 既是《古兰经》的科学之一，也是《古兰经》传达信息、教训、智慧和意图内容的方法。因此，在此基础上，《古兰经》有望为信教者、异教徒和伪善者的道德革命提供一种创新和方法，使他们更加认识到世界的美好和快乐，就像使人类坠入毁灭之谷的帕塔摩拉一样。那么，《古兰经》就是人类获得现世和后世救赎的指南
{"title":"RAHASIA AYAT-AYAT AMTSᾹL TENTANG KEHIDUPAN DUNIA DALAM AL-QUR’AN","authors":"Abdul Rasyid Ridho","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.551","url":null,"abstract":"The main problem in this study is the existence of the verses Amtsâ l in the Qur’an especially those relating to the description of world life and its interpretation of several interpreters as an approach, as well as a description of human attitudes in addressing the life of the world. So that Amtsâ l as one of the sciences of the Qur’an as well as the method of the Qur’an in conveying messages, lessons, and wisdom and intent content in it. So on this basis, Amtsâ l isexpected to be able to provide an innovation as well as a method in a mental revolution towards the morals of both believers, infdels, and hypocrites, to be more aware of the beauty and pleasure of the world like a patamorgana that makes humans fall into the valley of destruction. Then the Qur’an as a guide for humans to get the salvation of the world and the hereafter","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"272 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126056601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.553
Nihayah Abdurrahman
The main problem of interpretation is actually the giving of meaning and production of meaning, however, Muhammad Thalbi views the nature of interpretation, for Muhammad Thalbi the nature of interpretation is how an interpreter is able to fnd authentic meaning from a text through the socio-historical context then, then catching the aspect of the moral ideal to contextualize the meaning in the present era with the new methodology, the Qur’an must be seen as if it had just come down yesterday and the Prophet had just greeted us. This is in line with what was revealed by Thalbi that the new age also requires interpretation with a perspective that is open to renewal. With a historical approach that is flavored with a humanist perspective, he encourages a more open interpretation of the Qur’an through what he calls the approach (Qirâ ‘at Tarȋ khiyah)
解释的主要问题实际上是意义的赋予和意义的产生，然而，Muhammad Thalbi认为解释的本质，对于Muhammad Thalbi来说，解释的本质是解释者如何能够通过社会历史背景从文本中找到真正的意义，然后抓住道德理想的方面在当今时代用新的方法将意义语境化，《古兰经》必须被看作是昨天才降下来的，先知刚刚向我们致意。这与塔尔比所揭示的是一致的，即新时代也需要以一种对更新开放的视角来解释。用一种带有人文主义色彩的历史方法，他鼓励通过他所谓的方法(qir at tarkhiyah)对古兰经进行更开放的解释。
{"title":"RELEVANSI METODOLOGI TAfSIR KONTEMPORER (STUDI ATAS PEMIKIRAN MUHAMMAD THALBI)","authors":"Nihayah Abdurrahman","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.553","url":null,"abstract":"The main problem of interpretation is actually the giving of meaning and production of meaning, however, Muhammad Thalbi views the nature of interpretation, for Muhammad Thalbi the nature of interpretation is how an interpreter is able to fnd authentic meaning from a text through the socio-historical context then, then catching the aspect of the moral ideal to contextualize the meaning in the present era with the new methodology, the Qur’an must be seen as if it had just come down yesterday and the Prophet had just greeted us. This is in line with what was revealed by Thalbi that the new age also requires interpretation with a perspective that is open to renewal. With a historical approach that is flavored with a humanist perspective, he encourages a more open interpretation of the Qur’an through what he calls the approach (Qirâ ‘at Tarȋ khiyah)","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128290109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.552
Zulyadain Zulyadain
The main problem of interpretation is actually the giving of meaning and production of meaning, however, there is a difference between Rahman and about the nature of interpretation, for Rahman the essence of interpretation is how an interpreter is able to fnd authentic meaning from a text through socio-historical context the past, then capture the moral ideal aspect to contextualize the meaning in the present era with a new methodology. While syahrur, interpretation does not have to be like that, an interpreter, does not have to determine authentic meaning (original meaning) in the past, but can only immediately search for the meaning of the relevant text in the presentnera, because that meaning can also develop according to contemporary scientifc reasoning. The Qur’an must be seen as if it had just come down yesterday and the Prophet had just greeted us. Thus, Fazlur Rahman and Muhammad Sharur are progressive fgures of Muslims who carry out reforms as well as deconstruction and reconstruction of the study of the Qur’an’s interpretation in the contemporary era. Both are concerned with the Islamic paradigm that touches reality, by offering new interpretations and methodologies to religious teachings, to produce more humanist teachings
{"title":"METODOLOGI TAfSIR KONTEMPORER (STUDI KOMPARASI ATAS PEMIKIRAN fAzLUR RAHMAN DAN MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR)","authors":"Zulyadain Zulyadain","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.552","url":null,"abstract":"The main problem of interpretation is actually the giving of meaning and production of meaning, however, there is a difference between Rahman and about the nature of interpretation, for Rahman the essence of interpretation is how an interpreter is able to fnd authentic meaning from a text through socio-historical context the past, then capture the moral ideal aspect to contextualize the meaning in the present era with a new methodology. While syahrur, interpretation does not have to be like that, an interpreter, does not have to determine authentic meaning (original meaning) in the past, but can only immediately search for the meaning of the relevant text in the presentnera, because that meaning can also develop according to contemporary scientifc reasoning. The Qur’an must be seen as if it had just come down yesterday and the Prophet had just greeted us. Thus, Fazlur Rahman and Muhammad Sharur are progressive fgures of Muslims who carry out reforms as well as deconstruction and reconstruction of the study of the Qur’an’s interpretation in the contemporary era. Both are concerned with the Islamic paradigm that touches reality, by offering new interpretations and methodologies to religious teachings, to produce more humanist teachings","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131918753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.549
Ishak Hariyanto
This paper wants to describe the hermeneutical method of Muhammed Arkoun towards the Qur’an. In Arkoun’s view, the Qur’an needs to be reinterpreted, because when the Qur’an was revealed by Allah it has been influenced by the historical and social realities of Arab culture. In addition, Arkoun said that the Qur’an is the incarnation of God’s words conveyed to humans, constructed in human language, transmitted orally by human voices, and written in written form. To reinterpret the Al-Qur’an, a hermeneutical method is needed, namely seeing the hermeneutical circle between text, author, and reader. The text of the Qur’an according to Arkoun is very rich in symbols, meanings, and is always open to all interpretations for readers. So Arkoun views the text of the Qur’an as a free interpretation. A text that remains open and not limited to, interpretation, because an interpretation that can enrich the meaning of a text, so that a text is not only limited to the past but also has an openness to the future so that it can understand the wishes of the author. From that reason, interpreting a text is a task that is never completed. Every age must seek its own interpretation. In this context, the Qur’an is also very freely interpreted according to the times and conditions to give enlightenment to humans with the demands of the times
{"title":"HERMENEUTIKA AL-QUR’AN MUHAMMED ARKOUN","authors":"Ishak Hariyanto","doi":"10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.549","url":null,"abstract":"This paper wants to describe the hermeneutical method of Muhammed Arkoun towards the Qur’an. In Arkoun’s view, the Qur’an needs to be reinterpreted, because when the Qur’an was revealed by Allah it has been influenced by the historical and social realities of Arab culture. In addition, Arkoun said that the Qur’an is the incarnation of God’s words conveyed to humans, constructed in human language, transmitted orally by human voices, and written in written form. To reinterpret the Al-Qur’an, a hermeneutical method is needed, namely seeing the hermeneutical circle between text, author, and reader. The text of the Qur’an according to Arkoun is very rich in symbols, meanings, and is always open to all interpretations for readers. So Arkoun views the text of the Qur’an as a free interpretation. A text that remains open and not limited to, interpretation, because an interpretation that can enrich the meaning of a text, so that a text is not only limited to the past but also has an openness to the future so that it can understand the wishes of the author. From that reason, interpreting a text is a task that is never completed. Every age must seek its own interpretation. In this context, the Qur’an is also very freely interpreted according to the times and conditions to give enlightenment to humans with the demands of the times","PeriodicalId":239970,"journal":{"name":"el-'Umdah","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131277441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：