Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/37-53
V. Bialyk
INTRODUCTION The modern stage of the development of cognitive science is marked by linguists’ interest in the issues of language knowledge representation in terms of language means, where language is viewed as a sign system. Human cognition is the subject-matter of cognitive linguistics, the latter being treated as interaction of the systems of perception, presenting, and producing information in a word. This fact requires introducing a new term which could serve the purposes of cognitive terminology standardization. In the research under consideration we introduce such a term known as a lexical quantor (LQ). LQ is viewed as a nominative meaningful informative semiotic unit in the sphere of communication transferring a certain quantum of relevant information/knowledge about the surrounding world in the process of its cognition functioning at the same time as an operator of language world view (LWV). Thus, the information factor (quantum of information LQ represents) and functioning as an operator of LWV in spatial and temporal coordinate system (quantum+operator = quantor) are the vital prameters of LQ as a linguocognitive unit. These basic characteristics of LQ cannot be ignored while dealing with its ontology. The very ontology of LQ implies establishing some taxonomical criteria.The taxonomical criteria help to structure language knowledge and present it in the form of some system. The system is of paramount importance because it lies in space as an explication of local presentation of various notions 1 . Nowadays localism underlies cognitive linguistics implying spatial representation of knowledge. In this paper we propose two criteria to be considered, namely: the language knowledge evolution criterion, and 2) the language space criterion. The choice is much stipulated by the aforementioned factors that LQ is viewed as a linguocognitive unit transferring a certain quantum of knowledge about the language reality, on the one hand, and its active part in quantifying (dividing) the language reality by verbal means as an operator of the LWV, on the other.
{"title":"SOME CRITERIA OF A LEXICAL QUANTOR TYPOLOGY","authors":"V. Bialyk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/37-53","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/37-53","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The modern stage of the development of cognitive science is marked by linguists’ interest in the issues of language knowledge representation in terms of language means, where language is viewed as a sign system. Human cognition is the subject-matter of cognitive linguistics, the latter being treated as interaction of the systems of perception, presenting, and producing information in a word. This fact requires introducing a new term which could serve the purposes of cognitive terminology standardization. In the research under consideration we introduce such a term known as a lexical quantor (LQ). LQ is viewed as a nominative meaningful informative semiotic unit in the sphere of communication transferring a certain quantum of relevant information/knowledge about the surrounding world in the process of its cognition functioning at the same time as an operator of language world view (LWV). Thus, the information factor (quantum of information LQ represents) and functioning as an operator of LWV in spatial and temporal coordinate system (quantum+operator = quantor) are the vital prameters of LQ as a linguocognitive unit. These basic characteristics of LQ cannot be ignored while dealing with its ontology. The very ontology of LQ implies establishing some taxonomical criteria.The taxonomical criteria help to structure language knowledge and present it in the form of some system. The system is of paramount importance because it lies in space as an explication of local presentation of various notions 1 . Nowadays localism underlies cognitive linguistics implying spatial representation of knowledge. In this paper we propose two criteria to be considered, namely: the language knowledge evolution criterion, and 2) the language space criterion. The choice is much stipulated by the aforementioned factors that LQ is viewed as a linguocognitive unit transferring a certain quantum of knowledge about the language reality, on the one hand, and its active part in quantifying (dividing) the language reality by verbal means as an operator of the LWV, on the other.","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129827544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/89-108
Κ. Μ. Ivanochko
{"title":"ACCENT VARIANCE OF STRUKTURAL CLASS IX VERBS IN SOUTHWESTERN SUPRADIALECT OF UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE","authors":"Κ. Μ. Ivanochko","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/89-108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/89-108","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127096008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/54-71
L. Bieliekhova
INTRODUCTION The change of paradigms in the study of a text as a verbal object – from language-centered through text-centered to knowledge-centered – has brought to the forefront the assumption that text formation as well as the function of textual elements are regulated by certain cognitive mechanisms. This research focuses on revealing the nature of verbal poetic image from a cognitive perspective and aims at building an original typology of images in American poetry. It highlights cognitive mechanisms that lead to the emergence of novel poetic images which cause a possible breakthrough in the conceptualization of the world. In the framework of cognitive linguistics a poetic image is viewed as a textual construal and a cognitive structure which has two planes – conceptual and verbal. The conceptual plane of the image is understood as a unity of the eidetic (holistic) and the logical (discrete). The idea of discreteness has been laid at the basis of conceptual analysis of verbal poetic images within the framework of idealized cognitive models or image-schemas 1 . Conceptual analysis of rich empirical data obtained from contemporary American poetry suggested figuring out two groups of verbal poetic images: the old (archetypes and stereotypes) and new ones (idiotypes and kainotypes). In this article I share the view 2 that the frequent use of a particular kind of verbal poetic image depends on the prevalence of a certain type of artistic conscience (mythological, traditional, rational or irrational, and modern individually-creative) as well as of the kind of poetic thinking (analogical, associative, paradoxical, parabolic, and essayistic) governing in the definite cultural period. A poetic image is a verbal embodiment of the configuration of various conceptual schemas (metaphoric, metonymic and oxymoronic). Similar to
{"title":"NOVEL IMAGES IN THE IMAGERY SPACE OF AMERCAN POETIC DISCOURSE: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE","authors":"L. Bieliekhova","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/54-71","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/54-71","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The change of paradigms in the study of a text as a verbal object – from language-centered through text-centered to knowledge-centered – has brought to the forefront the assumption that text formation as well as the function of textual elements are regulated by certain cognitive mechanisms. This research focuses on revealing the nature of verbal poetic image from a cognitive perspective and aims at building an original typology of images in American poetry. It highlights cognitive mechanisms that lead to the emergence of novel poetic images which cause a possible breakthrough in the conceptualization of the world. In the framework of cognitive linguistics a poetic image is viewed as a textual construal and a cognitive structure which has two planes – conceptual and verbal. The conceptual plane of the image is understood as a unity of the eidetic (holistic) and the logical (discrete). The idea of discreteness has been laid at the basis of conceptual analysis of verbal poetic images within the framework of idealized cognitive models or image-schemas 1 . Conceptual analysis of rich empirical data obtained from contemporary American poetry suggested figuring out two groups of verbal poetic images: the old (archetypes and stereotypes) and new ones (idiotypes and kainotypes). In this article I share the view 2 that the frequent use of a particular kind of verbal poetic image depends on the prevalence of a certain type of artistic conscience (mythological, traditional, rational or irrational, and modern individually-creative) as well as of the kind of poetic thinking (analogical, associative, paradoxical, parabolic, and essayistic) governing in the definite cultural period. A poetic image is a verbal embodiment of the configuration of various conceptual schemas (metaphoric, metonymic and oxymoronic). Similar to","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132357813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/283-298
L. Strochenko
{"title":"VERBAL EMBODIMENT OF THE ENGLISH CONCEPT GENIUS","authors":"L. Strochenko","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/283-298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/283-298","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114403037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/178-200
O. Kushlyk
{"title":"PARAMETRIZATION OF TYPICAL WORD-FORMATION PARADIGMS OF THE ADJECTIVAL VERBS IN THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE DENOTING PROCESS AND ACTION","authors":"O. Kushlyk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/178-200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/178-200","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123384759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/267-282
M. SmagliyV., J. Locke, A. Helman, Charles W. Morris, Wojciech Duda-Dudkiewicz
{"title":"THEORETICAL ASSUMPTIONS OF INVESTIGATION SEMIOTIC CODES IN LITERARY TEXT AND FILM ADAPTATIONS","authors":"M. SmagliyV., J. Locke, A. Helman, Charles W. Morris, Wojciech Duda-Dudkiewicz","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/267-282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/267-282","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125222503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/160-177
V. Kotovych
INTRODUCTION Oikonymy has occupied an important place in the system of human values. It belongs to the cultural heritage of the people and is the very universal historical and social fact that gives the right to interpret it as a peculiar phenomenon of culture. The contemporary Ukrainian multicultural space cannot be analysed or interpreted without this important link in the traditional culture 1 . Considering the formation and development of Ukrainian oikonymy, researchers focus their attention on the fact that part of oikonyms were formed from appellatives and geographical terms, many were preceded by microtoponyms, some settlements were named after hydronyms or other oikonyms, while others would not have occurred without anthroponyms and their direct or indirect participation in their forming; former cities lost their urban status and became villages or vice versa. However, no matter how the process of establishing the name of the settlement was made, they have the same linguistic and cultural load, because they are formed according to certain linguistic laws and explicate information of the relevant code of culture. It has already become the standard of understanding that oikonyms as one of toponyms type contain triune information: geographical, historical and linguistic: “A toponym does not exist without the named object, and the objects of the environment are studied by geography. The need for toponyms, their contents, changes is dictated by history, but only through language. A name is a word, a fact of language, not geography or history itself. But the fact is specific, and linguistic knowledge without special toponymic one is not enough to study it” 2 . This thought, said by Volodymyr Nikonov over fifty years ago, convinces us that in the nineteenth century started, and in the twentieth century on the basis of geography, history, ethnography and linguistics was built a “universe of scientific research” – onomastics. In the twenty first century they spoke of onomocentrism, in which onomastic researches are carried out in close
{"title":"OIKONYMY OF UKRAINE: A RETROSPECTIVE OF ONOMASTIC RESEARCHES","authors":"V. Kotovych","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/160-177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/160-177","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Oikonymy has occupied an important place in the system of human values. It belongs to the cultural heritage of the people and is the very universal historical and social fact that gives the right to interpret it as a peculiar phenomenon of culture. The contemporary Ukrainian multicultural space cannot be analysed or interpreted without this important link in the traditional culture 1 . Considering the formation and development of Ukrainian oikonymy, researchers focus their attention on the fact that part of oikonyms were formed from appellatives and geographical terms, many were preceded by microtoponyms, some settlements were named after hydronyms or other oikonyms, while others would not have occurred without anthroponyms and their direct or indirect participation in their forming; former cities lost their urban status and became villages or vice versa. However, no matter how the process of establishing the name of the settlement was made, they have the same linguistic and cultural load, because they are formed according to certain linguistic laws and explicate information of the relevant code of culture. It has already become the standard of understanding that oikonyms as one of toponyms type contain triune information: geographical, historical and linguistic: “A toponym does not exist without the named object, and the objects of the environment are studied by geography. The need for toponyms, their contents, changes is dictated by history, but only through language. A name is a word, a fact of language, not geography or history itself. But the fact is specific, and linguistic knowledge without special toponymic one is not enough to study it” 2 . This thought, said by Volodymyr Nikonov over fifty years ago, convinces us that in the nineteenth century started, and in the twentieth century on the basis of geography, history, ethnography and linguistics was built a “universe of scientific research” – onomastics. In the twenty first century they spoke of onomocentrism, in which onomastic researches are carried out in close","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128283900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/1-17
N. Andreichuk
INTRODUCTION The critics of semiotics claim that this science has no unified subject matter and can be considered just an interesting hermeneutic practice and not entitled to conceive of itself as a scientific discipline. This article advocates the opinion that semiotics does have a unified subject as well as the status of a scientific discipline: it studies semiosis, that is the action of signs or the process in which something functions as a sign and a potentially endless series of interpretants is generated. Signs being a part of a developing process of information and understanding attached to particular objects 1 , semiosis is actually the action an interpreter must perform in understanding the signs. Interpretation as a problem or even as an explicit issue has tended to become a central concern in both: semiotics and hermeneutics since the earliest treatises on interpretation came forth. Generally acknowledged definition of hermeneutics as “the science of interpretation” 2 reflects the leitmotif of this science which deals with the processes of human understanding and interpretation of texts. Thus the notion of interpretation has always been across the two theories: theory of signs and theory of interpretation. As language is “the fundamental mode of operation of our being-in-the-world and the all-embracing form of the constitution of the world” 3 the article substantiates the inseparable unity of lingual semiotic and hermeneutic studies in the context of the interpretation process. For hermeneutics language is not simply, as modernism believed, a mere means of communication but rather, between word and object there exists an “intimate unity”: “The interpreter does not use words and concepts like a craftsman who picks up his tools and then puts them away.
{"title":"SEMIOTICS AND HERMENEUTICS: DESIGNING A SEMIOTIC-BASED APPROACH TO THEORIES OF INTERPRETATION","authors":"N. Andreichuk","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/1-17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/1-17","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The critics of semiotics claim that this science has no unified subject matter and can be considered just an interesting hermeneutic practice and not entitled to conceive of itself as a scientific discipline. This article advocates the opinion that semiotics does have a unified subject as well as the status of a scientific discipline: it studies semiosis, that is the action of signs or the process in which something functions as a sign and a potentially endless series of interpretants is generated. Signs being a part of a developing process of information and understanding attached to particular objects 1 , semiosis is actually the action an interpreter must perform in understanding the signs. Interpretation as a problem or even as an explicit issue has tended to become a central concern in both: semiotics and hermeneutics since the earliest treatises on interpretation came forth. Generally acknowledged definition of hermeneutics as “the science of interpretation” 2 reflects the leitmotif of this science which deals with the processes of human understanding and interpretation of texts. Thus the notion of interpretation has always been across the two theories: theory of signs and theory of interpretation. As language is “the fundamental mode of operation of our being-in-the-world and the all-embracing form of the constitution of the world” 3 the article substantiates the inseparable unity of lingual semiotic and hermeneutic studies in the context of the interpretation process. For hermeneutics language is not simply, as modernism believed, a mere means of communication but rather, between word and object there exists an “intimate unity”: “The interpreter does not use words and concepts like a craftsman who picks up his tools and then puts them away.","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124426048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/299-316
A. Tsapiv
INTRODUCTION Narration as a widespread speech activity can be observed in many spheres of life: in everyday conversation when one speaks about some experience as a sequence of events story, one can hear narratives on TV when a reporter tells us something based on cause-and-effect relationships. Narratives are the stories that we read to our children for the bedtime. Human brain is constructed in such a way that it captures complex reality, experience, life episodes in the form of narratives 1 . So, what is narrative? Narrative is a story about some events(s), presented as a sequence of events story, united by cause-and-effect relationships 2 . Narratologists try to create basic narrative explanatory models in order to understand the nature of storytelling 3 . How are the stories created? If there exists a set of typically structured stories with a number of participants and settings, there should be some abstract patterns in their background. The first scholar, who suggested to the philological world explanatory patterns, underlying Russian folktales, was Vladimir Propp. In his Morphology of the Folktale 4 the author explains a typical structure of a folktale (here fairy folktales are meant), which follows the chronological order of the linear sequence of elements in the text as reported from an informant (i.e. it means the syntagmatic structure). Another pattern of a paradigmatic nature was suggested by Propp’s opponent Claude LeviStrauss 5 . He proposes that all possible pattern elements are taken out and regrouped in one of the analytic schema. Propp’s functions refer to the building blocks of the tale’s plot and correlate with typical characters of folktales. Propp understands functions as character’s actions, defined from
{"title":"NARRATIVE MODELLING OF AMERICAN AND AUSTRALIAN FAIRY NARRATIVES FOR CHILDREN IN A CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE","authors":"A. Tsapiv","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/299-316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-131-5/299-316","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Narration as a widespread speech activity can be observed in many spheres of life: in everyday conversation when one speaks about some experience as a sequence of events story, one can hear narratives on TV when a reporter tells us something based on cause-and-effect relationships. Narratives are the stories that we read to our children for the bedtime. Human brain is constructed in such a way that it captures complex reality, experience, life episodes in the form of narratives 1 . So, what is narrative? Narrative is a story about some events(s), presented as a sequence of events story, united by cause-and-effect relationships 2 . Narratologists try to create basic narrative explanatory models in order to understand the nature of storytelling 3 . How are the stories created? If there exists a set of typically structured stories with a number of participants and settings, there should be some abstract patterns in their background. The first scholar, who suggested to the philological world explanatory patterns, underlying Russian folktales, was Vladimir Propp. In his Morphology of the Folktale 4 the author explains a typical structure of a folktale (here fairy folktales are meant), which follows the chronological order of the linear sequence of elements in the text as reported from an informant (i.e. it means the syntagmatic structure). Another pattern of a paradigmatic nature was suggested by Propp’s opponent Claude LeviStrauss 5 . He proposes that all possible pattern elements are taken out and regrouped in one of the analytic schema. Propp’s functions refer to the building blocks of the tale’s plot and correlate with typical characters of folktales. Propp understands functions as character’s actions, defined from","PeriodicalId":276969,"journal":{"name":"TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN TEACHING PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114599238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：