Pub Date : 2015-01-29DOI: 10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0177
Beth Godbee, Julia C. Novotny
This empirical case study aims to identify how graduate student women mentor each other when tutoring writing and, through doing so, assert their right to belong in the academy. Much existing literature on feminist mentoring emphasizes the need for better mentoring for women, whether in work or school environments, in current or future faculty positions (see, e.g., Bona, Rinehart, and Volbrecht; Darwin; Eble and Gaillet; Enos; Fishman and Lunsford; Goeke et al.). Across the literature, there is also attention to the role that peer mentoring or co-mentoring plays in providing support for women in higher education. Jennifer Goeke et al., for instance, have shown the importance of peer mentoring among junior faculty for achieving both scholarly productivity and work/life balance. Lori D. Patton has documented that peer mentoring among African American women provides a range of benefits, including “sharing information with friends, writing and studying together, seeking advice, and simply enjoying conversations with a person they could trust” (529). And in reflecting on their own relationship, Gail M. McGuire and Jo Reger have argued that reciprocal co-mentoring provides encouragement through shared success, allows individuals to pool knowledge and resources, and makes a space for sharing doubts about academia (62–63). While this literature suggests the value of mentoring, particularly feminist co-mentoring, it also indicates a need to understand better the nature of these collaborations. Specifically: what does feminist co-mentoring look like in practice? What interactional and relational work is involved when graduate student women mentor each other? Toward answering these large but central questions, we use the method and theory of applied conversation analysis (CA), which allows us to present and closely analyze a case study based on videotaped interactions of two graduate student women of color who met weekly in a campus writing center over several months. This case was recorded as part of a larger study that involved videotaping writing conferences and interviewing writers and tutors about their ongoing relationships and work together. Though the case study participants never explicitly name
本实证案例研究旨在确定研究生女学生在辅导写作时如何相互指导,并通过这样做来维护她们在学院的权利。许多关于女权主义指导的现有文献都强调需要为女性提供更好的指导,无论是在工作或学校环境中,还是在当前或未来的教职岗位上(参见Bona, Rinehart和Volbrecht;达尔文;埃布尔和盖勒;以挪士;菲什曼和伦斯福德;Goeke等人)。在整个文献中,还关注了同伴指导或共同指导在为高等教育中的女性提供支持方面所起的作用。例如,Jennifer Goeke等人已经证明了在初级教师中同伴指导对于实现学术生产力和工作/生活平衡的重要性。Lori D. Patton记录了非裔美国女性之间的同伴指导提供了一系列的好处,包括“与朋友分享信息,一起写作和学习,寻求建议,只是享受与一个他们可以信任的人交谈”(529)。在反思他们自己的关系时,Gail M. McGuire和Jo Reger认为,互惠的共同指导通过分享成功提供了鼓励,允许个人汇集知识和资源,并为分享对学术界的疑虑创造了空间(62-63)。虽然这些文献表明了指导的价值,特别是女权主义的共同指导,但它也表明需要更好地理解这些合作的本质。具体来说:女权主义的共同指导在实践中是什么样的?当女研究生互相指导时,涉及到哪些互动和关系的工作?为了回答这些大而核心的问题,我们使用了应用对话分析(CA)的方法和理论,这使我们能够呈现并仔细分析一个案例研究,该案例研究基于两个有色人种女研究生的视频互动,她们在几个月的时间里每周在校园写作中心见面。这个案例被记录为一个更大的研究的一部分,该研究包括对写作会议进行录像,并采访作家和导师,了解他们正在进行的关系和合作。尽管案例研究参与者从未明确点名
{"title":"Asserting the Right to Belong: Feminist Co-Mentoring among Graduate Student Women","authors":"Beth Godbee, Julia C. Novotny","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0177","url":null,"abstract":"This empirical case study aims to identify how graduate student women mentor each other when tutoring writing and, through doing so, assert their right to belong in the academy. Much existing literature on feminist mentoring emphasizes the need for better mentoring for women, whether in work or school environments, in current or future faculty positions (see, e.g., Bona, Rinehart, and Volbrecht; Darwin; Eble and Gaillet; Enos; Fishman and Lunsford; Goeke et al.). Across the literature, there is also attention to the role that peer mentoring or co-mentoring plays in providing support for women in higher education. Jennifer Goeke et al., for instance, have shown the importance of peer mentoring among junior faculty for achieving both scholarly productivity and work/life balance. Lori D. Patton has documented that peer mentoring among African American women provides a range of benefits, including “sharing information with friends, writing and studying together, seeking advice, and simply enjoying conversations with a person they could trust” (529). And in reflecting on their own relationship, Gail M. McGuire and Jo Reger have argued that reciprocal co-mentoring provides encouragement through shared success, allows individuals to pool knowledge and resources, and makes a space for sharing doubts about academia (62–63). While this literature suggests the value of mentoring, particularly feminist co-mentoring, it also indicates a need to understand better the nature of these collaborations. Specifically: what does feminist co-mentoring look like in practice? What interactional and relational work is involved when graduate student women mentor each other? Toward answering these large but central questions, we use the method and theory of applied conversation analysis (CA), which allows us to present and closely analyze a case study based on videotaped interactions of two graduate student women of color who met weekly in a campus writing center over several months. This case was recorded as part of a larger study that involved videotaping writing conferences and interviewing writers and tutors about their ongoing relationships and work together. Though the case study participants never explicitly name","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126368017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-01-29DOI: 10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0254
Nicole Décuré
A well-known riddle goes like this: A man and his son have a serious road accident. They arrive at the hospital. The father is dead. The son is taken into the operating room. The surgeon looks at the young person and cries out: “My son!” How come? Whether at the dinner table or in the classroom, this riddle never fails to provoke discussion. The most far-fetched hypotheses are made when the plain solution stares everyone in the face. So deeply ingrained is gender stereotyping that it takes most people a long time to make the very simple deduction (and a lot do not manage to do so) that the surgeon is the boy’s mother, that is to say not a man, but a woman. In a language like French, with the regrettable habit of not using the feminine form of a noun even when it is possible, especially for prestigious job titles, the problem gets worse as the surgeon becomes “le docteur” or “le chirurgien,”1 thereby suppressing, before it can even be born, any temptation to imagine the medical worker as female. Marina Yaguello (147) commented on the differences between English and French: “English-speaking people are rather better equipped than us French-speaking people, as they have at their disposal a majority of epicene nouns (indifferent to gender) as well as a system of epicene articles and adjectives. So much so that when we read, for example, a first-person narrative, we may well have to read dozens of pages or so before we are able to discover the sex of the narrator.”2
{"title":"Problems of Gender Identity: Using the Short Story as a Teaching Tool about Gender","authors":"Nicole Décuré","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0254","url":null,"abstract":"A well-known riddle goes like this: A man and his son have a serious road accident. They arrive at the hospital. The father is dead. The son is taken into the operating room. The surgeon looks at the young person and cries out: “My son!” How come? Whether at the dinner table or in the classroom, this riddle never fails to provoke discussion. The most far-fetched hypotheses are made when the plain solution stares everyone in the face. So deeply ingrained is gender stereotyping that it takes most people a long time to make the very simple deduction (and a lot do not manage to do so) that the surgeon is the boy’s mother, that is to say not a man, but a woman. In a language like French, with the regrettable habit of not using the feminine form of a noun even when it is possible, especially for prestigious job titles, the problem gets worse as the surgeon becomes “le docteur” or “le chirurgien,”1 thereby suppressing, before it can even be born, any temptation to imagine the medical worker as female. Marina Yaguello (147) commented on the differences between English and French: “English-speaking people are rather better equipped than us French-speaking people, as they have at their disposal a majority of epicene nouns (indifferent to gender) as well as a system of epicene articles and adjectives. So much so that when we read, for example, a first-person narrative, we may well have to read dozens of pages or so before we are able to discover the sex of the narrator.”2","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123948363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-01-29DOI: 10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0196
Heather Shipley
In April 2010, a series of proposed changes to the Ontario sex education curriculum for publicly-funded institutions within the province was announced. Within three days of that announcement, then premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty, put a hold on the proposed changes, stating that consideration of the multicultural and religiously diverse needs of the population was required before any changes were to go into effect (“McGuinty”). Since then, the Accepting Schools Act (regarding policies of nondiscrimination in publicly funded schools) has been introduced and hotly debated across the province, and a slightly revised curriculum was implemented in 2010 (to a lesser extent than originally proposed). I use the curriculum debate as an entryway to think about whether it is possible to queer public institutions, specifically asking whether we are capable of queering publicly funded education. Although much contemporary identity theory, and queer theory in particular, pushes boundaries of identity conformity and offers nuanced and complex pictures of the ways people live out their gendered and sexual identities, the gap between this cutting-edge research and the lived reality (here for youth) is demonstrated by ongoing negative responses to sexual or gender diversity. I argue that the consternation sexual and gender diversity elicits when introduced into sex education curriculum is a reflection of the resistance to destabilizing sexual identity within the institution of education. Incorporating Elizabeth Grosz’s theory of becoming and Brenda Cossman’s work on sexual citizenship, sexual identity destabilization within public education is critical because youth are in the process of becoming sexual citizens; and yet it is the space of becoming and of being in progress that elicits moral panic and resistance to this destabilization. Although identity theory and queer theory continue to push boundaries and ask challenging questions about what “normal” is and how “the normal” is continually redefined, there is still a large gap between these theoretical insights and the lived experience of identity difference. Surveys among youth in Canada, for example, regarding the experience of Queering Institutions?: Sexual Identity in Public Education in a Canadian Context
{"title":"Queering Institutions?: Sexual Identity in Public Education in a Canadian Context","authors":"Heather Shipley","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0196","url":null,"abstract":"In April 2010, a series of proposed changes to the Ontario sex education curriculum for publicly-funded institutions within the province was announced. Within three days of that announcement, then premier of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty, put a hold on the proposed changes, stating that consideration of the multicultural and religiously diverse needs of the population was required before any changes were to go into effect (“McGuinty”). Since then, the Accepting Schools Act (regarding policies of nondiscrimination in publicly funded schools) has been introduced and hotly debated across the province, and a slightly revised curriculum was implemented in 2010 (to a lesser extent than originally proposed). I use the curriculum debate as an entryway to think about whether it is possible to queer public institutions, specifically asking whether we are capable of queering publicly funded education. Although much contemporary identity theory, and queer theory in particular, pushes boundaries of identity conformity and offers nuanced and complex pictures of the ways people live out their gendered and sexual identities, the gap between this cutting-edge research and the lived reality (here for youth) is demonstrated by ongoing negative responses to sexual or gender diversity. I argue that the consternation sexual and gender diversity elicits when introduced into sex education curriculum is a reflection of the resistance to destabilizing sexual identity within the institution of education. Incorporating Elizabeth Grosz’s theory of becoming and Brenda Cossman’s work on sexual citizenship, sexual identity destabilization within public education is critical because youth are in the process of becoming sexual citizens; and yet it is the space of becoming and of being in progress that elicits moral panic and resistance to this destabilization. Although identity theory and queer theory continue to push boundaries and ask challenging questions about what “normal” is and how “the normal” is continually redefined, there is still a large gap between these theoretical insights and the lived experience of identity difference. Surveys among youth in Canada, for example, regarding the experience of Queering Institutions?: Sexual Identity in Public Education in a Canadian Context","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134002554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-01-29DOI: 10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0230
Erica Benson, Theresa D. Kemp, Angela G. Pirlott, C. Coughlin, Quinn Forss, Laura Becherer
{"title":"Developing a Nonsexist/Nongendered Language Policy at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire","authors":"Erica Benson, Theresa D. Kemp, Angela G. Pirlott, C. Coughlin, Quinn Forss, Laura Becherer","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0230","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122842237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-01-29DOI: 10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0211
V. Sulé
Having faced seemingly insurmountable challenges of enslavement, Jim Crow segregation, and de facto discriminatory practices, African Americans have historically championed education as a vehicle for community enrichment (Anderson Education; Cooper Voice; Giddings).1 Thus, among African Americans, education has long served as a mechanism to facilitate societal transformation—the form of transformation that addresses social inequities. For many African Americans, however, educational access was an elusive proposition because the entanglements of race, gender, and class placed them at a disadvantage. Furthermore, the few who reached the highest strata of educational attainment had to contend with institutional processes that operated to undermine their legitimacy or discourage their investment in social equity issues (Collins Fighting; Anderson “Race”; Malveaux). Often barred from the most resource-rich institutions, Black scholars committed to improving the life outcomes of others had to determine how to fulfill their altruistic agenda while maintaining their cerebral endeavors. Despite these challenges, some scholars were able to marry their intellectualism with community activism. Most notable among them is Dr. Anna Julia Cooper, an educator who rose from slavery to become the fourth African-American female to receive a PhD degree. Through an exploration of Cooper’s life and praxis, this paper serves as a blueprint for scholars invested in merging theory and social action to enact what I label intellectual activism. Most importantly, it places Cooper’s work within a paradigm that names educational access as a human right because her educational philosophy challenges structures and practices that hinder personal development and engagement in civic life.
{"title":"Intellectual Activism: The Praxis of Dr. Anna Julia Cooper as a Blueprint for Equity-Based Pedagogy","authors":"V. Sulé","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.23.3.0211","url":null,"abstract":"Having faced seemingly insurmountable challenges of enslavement, Jim Crow segregation, and de facto discriminatory practices, African Americans have historically championed education as a vehicle for community enrichment (Anderson Education; Cooper Voice; Giddings).1 Thus, among African Americans, education has long served as a mechanism to facilitate societal transformation—the form of transformation that addresses social inequities. For many African Americans, however, educational access was an elusive proposition because the entanglements of race, gender, and class placed them at a disadvantage. Furthermore, the few who reached the highest strata of educational attainment had to contend with institutional processes that operated to undermine their legitimacy or discourage their investment in social equity issues (Collins Fighting; Anderson “Race”; Malveaux). Often barred from the most resource-rich institutions, Black scholars committed to improving the life outcomes of others had to determine how to fulfill their altruistic agenda while maintaining their cerebral endeavors. Despite these challenges, some scholars were able to marry their intellectualism with community activism. Most notable among them is Dr. Anna Julia Cooper, an educator who rose from slavery to become the fourth African-American female to receive a PhD degree. Through an exploration of Cooper’s life and praxis, this paper serves as a blueprint for scholars invested in merging theory and social action to enact what I label intellectual activism. Most importantly, it places Cooper’s work within a paradigm that names educational access as a human right because her educational philosophy challenges structures and practices that hinder personal development and engagement in civic life.","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132155952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}