首页 > 最新文献

The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis最新文献

英文 中文
Dynamic Efficiency and Productivity 动态效率和生产力
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.5
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, D. Margaritis, William L. Weber
The focus of this chapter is to move the measurement of efficiency and productivity from a static to a dynamic approach using distance functions. Since distance functions represent technology, the authors first specify that technology in a dynamic framework is amenable to data envelopment analysis (DEA)–type estimation, explicitly allowing current (or past) decisions to affect future production possibilities. This includes notions of intermediate products, investment, time substitution, supply chain, networks and possible reallocations across time. The chapter shows how to estimate dynamic distance functions and specify a multi-period dynamic model in the spirit of Ramsey (1928), as well as an adjacent-period model familiar from the Malmquist productivity literature, providing an empirical illustration of the former. Extensions of these dynamic models is relatively straightforward for other distance function–based productivity indices, both parametric and nonparametric, as well as for production in the presence of good and bad outputs.
本章的重点是使用距离函数将效率和生产率的测量从静态方法转移到动态方法。由于距离函数代表技术,作者首先指出,动态框架中的技术适用于数据包络分析(DEA)类型的估计,明确允许当前(或过去)的决策影响未来的生产可能性。这包括中间产品、投资、时间替代、供应链、网络和可能的跨时间再分配的概念。本章展示了如何估计动态距离函数,并以Ramsey(1928)的精神指定多时期动态模型,以及Malmquist生产力文献中熟悉的邻接时期模型,提供了前者的实证说明。这些动态模型的扩展对于其他基于距离函数的生产率指数(参数和非参数)以及存在好输出和坏输出的生产来说相对简单。
{"title":"Dynamic Efficiency and Productivity","authors":"R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, D. Margaritis, William L. Weber","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.5","url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this chapter is to move the measurement of efficiency and productivity from a static to a dynamic approach using distance functions. Since distance functions represent technology, the authors first specify that technology in a dynamic framework is amenable to data envelopment analysis (DEA)–type estimation, explicitly allowing current (or past) decisions to affect future production possibilities. This includes notions of intermediate products, investment, time substitution, supply chain, networks and possible reallocations across time. The chapter shows how to estimate dynamic distance functions and specify a multi-period dynamic model in the spirit of Ramsey (1928), as well as an adjacent-period model familiar from the Malmquist productivity literature, providing an empirical illustration of the former. Extensions of these dynamic models is relatively straightforward for other distance function–based productivity indices, both parametric and nonparametric, as well as for production in the presence of good and bad outputs.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123082995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Theory, Techniques, and Applications of Regulatory Benchmarking and Productivity Analysis 管理基准和生产力分析的理论、技术和应用
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.16
Per J. Agrell, P. Bogetoft
State-of-the-art benchmarking methods, and in particular data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), are well-established and informative tools in economic regulation to set reasonable revenue caps for energy network operators. However, regulatory benchmarking is not just another application of productivity analysis. This chapter reviews the economic theory upon which these applications are based and the additional stages in activity analysis, data analysis, and model development that are necessary. The chapter also provides detailed analyses of the applications in international electricity transmission and for the Norwegian electricity distribution networks.
最先进的基准方法,特别是数据包络分析(DEA)和随机前沿分析(SFA),是经济监管中行之有效的信息工具,可为能源网络运营商设定合理的收入上限。然而,监管基准不仅仅是生产力分析的另一种应用。本章回顾了这些应用所基于的经济理论,以及必要的活动分析、数据分析和模型开发的附加阶段。本章还详细分析了在国际电力传输和挪威配电网络中的应用。
{"title":"Theory, Techniques, and Applications of Regulatory Benchmarking and Productivity Analysis","authors":"Per J. Agrell, P. Bogetoft","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.16","url":null,"abstract":"State-of-the-art benchmarking methods, and in particular data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), are well-established and informative tools in economic regulation to set reasonable revenue caps for energy network operators. However, regulatory benchmarking is not just another application of productivity analysis. This chapter reviews the economic theory upon which these applications are based and the additional stages in activity analysis, data analysis, and model development that are necessary. The chapter also provides detailed analyses of the applications in international electricity transmission and for the Norwegian electricity distribution networks.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121814547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Business Model Innovation and Replication 商业模式创新与复制
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.10
Roberto García-Castro, J. Ricart, M. Lieberman, N. Balasubramanian
Productivity gains play a crucial role in value creation and distribution in firms. This chapter connects the strategy framework of value creation and value capture with the tools from the productivity literature in order to understand better how returns are distributed between different stakeholders in the business and how this distribution might evolve over time. The authors distinguish between business model innovation and replication as two genuine sources of value creation. The historical analysis of Southwest Airlines in the US airline industry illustrates the insights that can be gained using a formal model to measure productivity gains at the firm level.
生产率的提高在企业的价值创造和分配中起着至关重要的作用。本章将价值创造和价值获取的战略框架与生产力文献中的工具联系起来,以便更好地理解回报如何在业务中的不同利益相关者之间分配,以及这种分配如何随着时间的推移而演变。两位作者将商业模式创新和复制区分为两种真正的价值创造来源。对美国航空业西南航空公司的历史分析说明了可以使用正式模型来衡量公司层面的生产率增长的见解。
{"title":"Business Model Innovation and Replication","authors":"Roberto García-Castro, J. Ricart, M. Lieberman, N. Balasubramanian","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.10","url":null,"abstract":"Productivity gains play a crucial role in value creation and distribution in firms. This chapter connects the strategy framework of value creation and value capture with the tools from the productivity literature in order to understand better how returns are distributed between different stakeholders in the business and how this distribution might evolve over time. The authors distinguish between business model innovation and replication as two genuine sources of value creation. The historical analysis of Southwest Airlines in the US airline industry illustrates the insights that can be gained using a formal model to measure productivity gains at the firm level.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130857335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Productivity Measurement in the Public Sector 公营部门的生产力测量
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.7
W. Diewert
Governments either provide various goods and services at no cost or at highly subsidized prices. It is usually possible to measure the quantities of these government-sector outputs and inputs as well as input prices, but the problem is how to estimate the corresponding output prices. Once meaningful output prices have been estimated, the measurement of productivity growth using index numbers can proceed in the usual manner. This chapter suggests three possible general methods for measuring public-sector output prices and quantities. Specific measurement issues in the health and education sectors are discussed. Similar output and productivity measurement issues arise in the regulated sectors of an economy since regulated producers are forced to provide services at prices that are not equal to marginal or average unit costs. Finally, the problems associated with measuring capital services are discussed.
政府要么免费提供各种商品和服务,要么提供高补贴价格。通常可以测量这些政府部门产出和投入的数量以及投入的价格,但问题是如何估计相应的产出价格。一旦估算出有意义的产出价格,就可以按照通常的方式使用指数来衡量生产率增长。本章提出了测量公共部门产出价格和数量的三种可能的一般方法。讨论了卫生和教育部门的具体衡量问题。类似的产出和生产率衡量问题也出现在一个经济体的受管制部门,因为受管制的生产者被迫以不等于边际或平均单位成本的价格提供服务。最后,讨论了与资本服务计量有关的问题。
{"title":"Productivity Measurement in the Public Sector","authors":"W. Diewert","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.7","url":null,"abstract":"Governments either provide various goods and services at no cost or at highly subsidized prices. It is usually possible to measure the quantities of these government-sector outputs and inputs as well as input prices, but the problem is how to estimate the corresponding output prices. Once meaningful output prices have been estimated, the measurement of productivity growth using index numbers can proceed in the usual manner. This chapter suggests three possible general methods for measuring public-sector output prices and quantities. Specific measurement issues in the health and education sectors are discussed. Similar output and productivity measurement issues arise in the regulated sectors of an economy since regulated producers are forced to provide services at prices that are not equal to marginal or average unit costs. Finally, the problems associated with measuring capital services are discussed.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131880708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Productivity Measurement and the Environment 生产力测量与环境
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.8
F. Førsund
The materials balance tells us that matter cannot be created or destroyed. The mass contained in inputs must either be contained in the outputs or contained in residuals. Residuals are discharged to the external environment and are pollutants if harmful effects arise. Damages are measured by the willingness to pay for environmental qualities. Static productivity is measured by a ratio of an output index, subtracted damages measured in money, on a multifactor input index. Static productivity will decrease when considering damages, but the social productivity change may go both up and down. A model considering both desirable and undesirable outputs should contain two types of relations: a production function for the desirable outputs, and one for the undesirable outputs. One way of doing this is to specify the functions to have the same set of inputs. This is the factorially determined multi-output model of Frisch. Productivity change measures can be calculated for each type of output separately using a Malmquist index.
物质平衡告诉我们物质不能被创造或毁灭。包含在输入中的质量要么包含在输出中,要么包含在残差中。残留物被排放到外部环境中,如果产生有害影响,就是污染物。损害是通过为环境质量买单的意愿来衡量的。静态生产率是用产出指数减去以货币衡量的损失与多因素投入指数之比来衡量的。考虑损害因素,静态生产力会下降,而社会生产力的变化可能是上下波动的。考虑理想输出和不理想输出的模型应该包含两种类型的关系:理想输出的生产函数和不理想输出的生产函数。一种方法是指定函数具有相同的输入集。这是Frisch的因子决定多输出模型。生产率变化措施可以使用马尔姆奎斯特指数分别计算每种类型的产出。
{"title":"Productivity Measurement and the Environment","authors":"F. Førsund","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.8","url":null,"abstract":"The materials balance tells us that matter cannot be created or destroyed. The mass contained in inputs must either be contained in the outputs or contained in residuals. Residuals are discharged to the external environment and are pollutants if harmful effects arise. Damages are measured by the willingness to pay for environmental qualities. Static productivity is measured by a ratio of an output index, subtracted damages measured in money, on a multifactor input index. Static productivity will decrease when considering damages, but the social productivity change may go both up and down. A model considering both desirable and undesirable outputs should contain two types of relations: a production function for the desirable outputs, and one for the undesirable outputs. One way of doing this is to specify the functions to have the same set of inputs. This is the factorially determined multi-output model of Frisch. Productivity change measures can be calculated for each type of output separately using a Malmquist index.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116891781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Productivity and Substitution Patterns in Global Value Chains 全球价值链中的生产力与替代模式
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.21
M. Timmer, Xianjia Ye
Fragmentation of production is posing new challenges to the analysis and measurement of productivity. Traditional approaches focus on firms, industries, or countries as the unit of analysis. This chapter argues that studies of global value chains (GVCs) are needed in situations where production is fragmented across firms and geographical borders. The chapter outlines how existing tools for measuring productivity, factor substitution, and (biased) technological change can be modified to analyze GVC production. A key concept is a production function where final output is generated based on factor inputs only, including both domestic as well as foreign factors. The chapter outlines what type of data would be needed and provides illustrative analyses of GVCs of manufacturing products based on the WIOD (world input-output database).
生产的碎片化对生产率的分析和衡量提出了新的挑战。传统的方法以公司、行业或国家为分析单位。本章认为,在生产在企业和地理边界之间分散的情况下,需要对全球价值链(GVCs)进行研究。本章概述了如何修改现有的衡量生产率、要素替代和(有偏差的)技术变革的工具来分析全球价值链生产。一个关键概念是生产函数,其中最终产出仅基于要素投入,包括国内和国外因素。本章概述了需要的数据类型,并提供了基于WIOD(世界投入产出数据库)的制造业产品全球价值链的说明性分析。
{"title":"Productivity and Substitution Patterns in Global Value Chains","authors":"M. Timmer, Xianjia Ye","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.21","url":null,"abstract":"Fragmentation of production is posing new challenges to the analysis and measurement of productivity. Traditional approaches focus on firms, industries, or countries as the unit of analysis. This chapter argues that studies of global value chains (GVCs) are needed in situations where production is fragmented across firms and geographical borders. The chapter outlines how existing tools for measuring productivity, factor substitution, and (biased) technological change can be modified to analyze GVC production. A key concept is a production function where final output is generated based on factor inputs only, including both domestic as well as foreign factors. The chapter outlines what type of data would be needed and provides illustrative analyses of GVCs of manufacturing products based on the WIOD (world input-output database).","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116985397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The World KLEMS Initiative 世界KLEMS倡议
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.20
D. Jorgenson
The World KLEMS Initiative generates industry-level data on outputs, inputs, and productivity. Productivity is output per unit of all inputs. The inputs consist of the primary factors of production—capital (K) and labor (L)—and the intermediate inputs: energy (E), materials (M), and services (S). Industry-level data are indispensable for analyzing the sources of economic growth. Productivity gaps between two countries are defined in terms of differences in productivity levels. These differences are measured by linking productivity levels for each country by purchasing power parities for outputs and inputs. The large productivity gap between the United States and Japan in 1955 gradually closed until 1995. Since then, Japanese productivity has been stagnant, while US productivity has continued to grow. The widening productivity gap can be traced to a small number of sectors, mainly in trade and services.
世界KLEMS倡议生成有关产出、投入和生产率的行业级数据。生产率是每单位投入的产出。这些投入包括主要的生产要素——资本(K)和劳动力(L),以及中间投入:能源(E)、材料(M)和服务(S)。产业层面的数据对于分析经济增长的来源是不可或缺的。两国之间的生产率差距是根据生产率水平的差异来定义的。这些差异是通过将每个国家的生产率水平与产出和投入的购买力平价联系起来来衡量的。1955年美国和日本之间巨大的生产率差距直到1995年才逐渐缩小。自那以来,日本的生产率一直停滞不前,而美国的生产率却在持续增长。不断扩大的生产率差距可以追溯到少数几个部门,主要是贸易和服务业。
{"title":"The World KLEMS Initiative","authors":"D. Jorgenson","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.20","url":null,"abstract":"The World KLEMS Initiative generates industry-level data on outputs, inputs, and productivity. Productivity is output per unit of all inputs. The inputs consist of the primary factors of production—capital (K) and labor (L)—and the intermediate inputs: energy (E), materials (M), and services (S). Industry-level data are indispensable for analyzing the sources of economic growth. Productivity gaps between two countries are defined in terms of differences in productivity levels. These differences are measured by linking productivity levels for each country by purchasing power parities for outputs and inputs. The large productivity gap between the United States and Japan in 1955 gradually closed until 1995. Since then, Japanese productivity has been stagnant, while US productivity has continued to grow. The widening productivity gap can be traced to a small number of sectors, mainly in trade and services.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130281990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Theoretical Productivity Indices 理论生产率指标
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.4
R. Robert Russell
Theoretical productivity indices provide a framework for comparing productivity levels over time or across economic units. Prominent approaches—generalizations of the classic Solow model of technical change to encompass multiple outputs—have come to be known as the Malmquist index and the Hicks-Moorsteen index. The former employs radial distance functions to measure productivity change in either input or output space, whereas the latter employs ratios of radial distance functions in each space to measure the relative change. When production below the frontier is taken into account, the Malmquist index decomposes naturally into the effects of shifts in the production frontier and changes in inefficiency. Other decomposition concepts encompass components like scale effects. Nonradial measures of productivity change in the full input–output space have been formulated using hyperbolic and directional distance functions. Also discussed are dual productivity indices (employing cost and revenue functions) and aggregation of productivity indices across economic units.
理论生产率指数为比较不同时期或不同经济单位的生产率水平提供了一个框架。突出的方法——将经典的索洛技术变革模型概括为包含多种产出的模型——已被称为马姆奎斯特指数和希克斯-摩尔斯汀指数。前者使用径向距离函数来衡量输入或输出空间的生产率变化,而后者使用每个空间中径向距离函数的比率来衡量相对变化。当考虑到边界以下的生产时,马尔姆奎斯特指数自然分解为生产边界转移和低效率变化的影响。其他分解概念包含了像规模效应这样的组件。在全投入产出空间中,生产率变化的非径向度量已经使用双曲和定向距离函数进行了表述。还讨论了双重生产率指数(采用成本和收入函数)和跨经济单位的生产率指数汇总。
{"title":"Theoretical Productivity Indices","authors":"R. Robert Russell","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.4","url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical productivity indices provide a framework for comparing productivity levels over time or across economic units. Prominent approaches—generalizations of the classic Solow model of technical change to encompass multiple outputs—have come to be known as the Malmquist index and the Hicks-Moorsteen index. The former employs radial distance functions to measure productivity change in either input or output space, whereas the latter employs ratios of radial distance functions in each space to measure the relative change. When production below the frontier is taken into account, the Malmquist index decomposes naturally into the effects of shifts in the production frontier and changes in inefficiency. Other decomposition concepts encompass components like scale effects. Nonradial measures of productivity change in the full input–output space have been formulated using hyperbolic and directional distance functions. Also discussed are dual productivity indices (employing cost and revenue functions) and aggregation of productivity indices across economic units.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126051946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The Industry Sources of Productivity Growth and Convergence 生产率增长与趋同的产业来源
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190226718.013.22
R. Inklaar
Industry-level productivity analysis can be a useful diagnostic tool to better understand why some countries show faster overall productivity growth and to direct research attention to parts of the economy that warrant more detailed scrutiny. This chapter illustrates these strengths in three applications, namely the Europe-US productivity growth gap since the mid-1990s, the sectoral sources of rapid convergence of productivity levels between advanced and emerging economies, and an analysis of the determinants of productivity growth and convergence. One conclusion is that a better understanding of productivity growth (or lack thereof) in services industries should still be an important goal of researchers aiming to understand cross-country growth differences.
行业层面的生产率分析是一种有用的诊断工具,可以更好地理解为什么一些国家的整体生产率增长更快,并将研究注意力引导到需要更详细审查的经济领域。本章从三个方面阐述了这些优势,即自上世纪90年代中期以来的欧美生产率增长差距、发达经济体和新兴经济体之间生产率水平快速趋同的部门来源,以及对生产率增长和趋同的决定因素的分析。一个结论是,更好地理解服务业的生产率增长(或缺乏生产率增长)仍然应该是旨在理解跨国增长差异的研究人员的一个重要目标。
{"title":"The Industry Sources of Productivity Growth and Convergence","authors":"R. Inklaar","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190226718.013.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190226718.013.22","url":null,"abstract":"Industry-level productivity analysis can be a useful diagnostic tool to better understand why some countries show faster overall productivity growth and to direct research attention to parts of the economy that warrant more detailed scrutiny. This chapter illustrates these strengths in three applications, namely the Europe-US productivity growth gap since the mid-1990s, the sectoral sources of rapid convergence of productivity levels between advanced and emerging economies, and an analysis of the determinants of productivity growth and convergence. One conclusion is that a better understanding of productivity growth (or lack thereof) in services industries should still be an important goal of researchers aiming to understand cross-country growth differences.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130839105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Productivity and Financial Performance 生产力及财务表现
Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.9
E. Grifell-Tatjé, C. A. Knox, Lovell C. A. Knox Lovell
This chapter explores the relationship between productivity and financial performance, primarily at the level of an individual business. It begins by decomposing profit change into price and quantity drivers, under alternative accounting treatments of operating surplus. The chapter considers a range of related issues, including the drivers of productivity change, the distribution of the value productivity that change creates, problems associated with missing or distorted prices, complications caused by fluctuating exchange rates, and the use of price change to measure productivity change. In addition to profit, it considers alternative measures of financial performance, such as return on assets and unit cost. The chapter concludes by pointing to some topics deserving of further research.
本章主要在单个企业的层面上探讨生产率和财务绩效之间的关系。它首先将利润变化分解为价格和数量驱动因素,采用经营盈余的替代会计处理方法。本章考虑了一系列相关问题,包括生产率变化的驱动因素、变化所创造的价值生产率的分配、与价格缺失或扭曲相关的问题、汇率波动引起的复杂性以及使用价格变化来衡量生产率变化。除了利润,它还考虑其他财务绩效指标,如资产回报率和单位成本。本章最后指出了一些值得进一步研究的问题。
{"title":"Productivity and Financial Performance","authors":"E. Grifell-Tatjé, C. A. Knox, Lovell C. A. Knox Lovell","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.9","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the relationship between productivity and financial performance, primarily at the level of an individual business. It begins by decomposing profit change into price and quantity drivers, under alternative accounting treatments of operating surplus. The chapter considers a range of related issues, including the drivers of productivity change, the distribution of the value productivity that change creates, problems associated with missing or distorted prices, complications caused by fluctuating exchange rates, and the use of price change to measure productivity change. In addition to profit, it considers alternative measures of financial performance, such as return on assets and unit cost. The chapter concludes by pointing to some topics deserving of further research.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131353907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1