ARP Rheumatology最新文献

Background: Qualitative data on how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the lives of people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) in different European countries are lacking.

Objectives: To describe the impact of the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with inflammatory RMDs concerning (self)management of their disease, interaction with the health care team, emotional well-being and overall health.

Methods: A mixed-methods study of adults (>18 years) with RMDs on immunosuppression from Cyprus, England, Greece, and Portugal took part on online focus groups (FG) after the first wave (July-August, 2020). The data was transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Informed by the qualitative findings, a follow-up survey was developed for the same participants after the second wave, allowing to compare the perceived impact.

Results: Twenty-four patients (6 from each country; 21 women; 33-74 years range) participated. Three key themes were identified (with 3-7 subthemes each), focusing on the impact of COVID-19 on the: (i) individual, (ii) health settings, and (iii) work and community. Overall, qualitative results were similar across countries. The follow-up survey during the second wave highlighted a worsening of psychosocial aspects, e.g. sleep problems, stress, and isolation.

Conclusions: People with RMDs felt vulnerable and anxious, specifically about how to cope with isolation and difficulties in communicating with healthcare providers. The second wave had a more significant impact on patients. Healthcare providers and policymakers need to consider measures to ameliorate the longer-term impact that many may still face.

Case report: A 68-year-old male treated with secukinumab for psoriatic arthritis suspended treatment for three months due to COVID pandemic. Upon secukinumab reintroduction, anorexia and weight loss ensued and four months later he had an abrupt onset of low-grade fever, fatigue, flu-like symptoms, dyspnoea and widespread inflammatory arthralgias. Laboratory investigations showed de novo anaemia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, cytocholestasis, elevated acute phase reactants, C3 complement consumption, proteinuria (1630mg/24h), active urine sediment, positive antinuclear (1:1280) and anti-double-stranded DNA (212.3 IU/mL) antibodies. Chest imaging showed peripheral pulmonary embolism, lobar pneumonia, and a small bilateral pleural effusion. Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) was suspected, and the patient was hospitalised. Secukinumab was discontinued and treatment with enoxaparin, antibiotics, enalapril, hydroxychloroquine and prednisolone 0.5mg/kg qd was started. Clinical and laboratorial remission ensued after one month except for proteinuria (decreased to 653mg/24h). Proliferative lupus nephritis was assumed and mycophenolate mofetil was introduced, with sustained complete remission over a 33-month follow-up.

Discussion: This is the second reported case of systemic secukinumab-associated DILE, and the first with renal involvement. Clinical and laboratory features of DILE are reviewed and compared with previously described cases.

Objective: To compare the 2-year retention rate between a second tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) and secukinumab (SEK) or ustekinumab (UST), in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) patients with previous inadequate response to their first TNFi.

Methods: Prospective longitudinal cohort study with a follow-up period of 2 years using the Nationwide Portuguese Reuma.pt database. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of PsA who also fulfill the CASPAR classification criteria, with previous treatment failure to a first-line TNFi and having started a second biotechnological drug (TNFi, SEK or UST) were included. The Cycling group was defined as switching from a first TNFi to a second TNFi, and the Swapping group as switching from a first TNFi to SEK or UST. Sociodemographic data, disease characteristics, disease activity scores and physical function at baseline and after 6, 12 and 24 months were recorded. Cox-proportional hazards regression was used to compare retention rates between Cycling and Swapping groups. To obtain a predictor model of 2-year discontinuation, a multivariable Cox regression model was performed.

Results: In total, 439 patients were included, 58% were female, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 49 (12) years. Globally, 75.6% initiated a second TNFi (Cycling group), and 24.4% started SEK/UST (Swapping group). The retention rates after 6, 12 and 24 months were 72%/66%/59% in the Cycling group; and 77%/66%/59% in the Swapping group. There were no significant differences in retention rates between both strategies (HR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.72-1.16). After 2 years of follow-up, 34.4% of patients discontinued their second biologic, mainly due to inefficacy (72.8%), with no differences found between groups. Baseline treatment with glucocorticoids was the only predictor of discontinuation after 2 years of follow-up (HR:1.668, 95% CI 1.154-2.409).

Conclusions: After failure of a first TNF inhibitor, Cycling and Swapping strategies result in similar retention rates suggesting that both are acceptable in the management of patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Objectives: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common health problem and in most patients it is not possible to identify a specific cause (non-specific CLBP). Spondyloarthritis is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by (often inflammatory) back pain and spinal stiffness. The impact of CLBP and spondyloarthritis on patients' physical function may be different. This study aims to compare physical disability in patients with spondyloarthritis and CLBP, in a population-based setting. Furthermore, we aim to identify modifiable risk factors for physical disability among these two populations.

Methods: Data from EpiReumaPt, a national health cohort with 10 661 individuals, conducted from September 2011 to December 2013, was used. Physical function was accessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and by the physical function dimension of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to assess the differences between groups. Factors associated with physical disability were explored for both diseases.

Results: We evaluated 92 patients with spondyloarthritis, 1376 patients with CLBP and 679 subjects without rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Spondyloarthritis and CLBP patients reported significantly higher levels of disability in HAQ-DI (ß=0.33; p < 0.001 and ß=0.20; p < 0.001, respectively) than subjects without RMDs. In comparison to CLBP patients, spondyloarthritis patients reported higher disability (ß=0.14; p=0.03). The physical domains of SF-36, bodily pain and general health, where more affected in spondyloarthritis patients than in CLBP patients (ß=-6.61; p=0.02 and ß=-5.94; p=0.001, respectively). Spondyloarthritis and CLBP patients had a worse physical summary score (PCS) than mental summary score (MCS), and only PCS was significantly worse in comparison to subjects without RMDs. Factors associated with physical disability in CLBP were low back pain intensity, older age, obesity, multimorbidity, and retirement. Similarly, in spondyloarthritis physical disability was associated with retirement and multimorbidity. Factors associated with lower disability were alcohol consumption and male gender in CLBP, and regular physical exercise was associated with lower disability in both disorders.

Conclusions: In this nationwide cohort, spondyloarthritis and CLBP patients reported significant physical disability. Regular physical exercise was associated with lower disability in both diseases.

Introduction: Anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) agents can potentially induce the anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) development over time. Evidence of the real impact of these autoantibodies on clinical response to treatment in rheumatic patients is still scarce.

Objectives: To explore the impact of ANA seroconversion induced by anti-TNFα therapy on clinical outcomes in biologic-naïve patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study enrolling biologic-naïve patients with RA, axSpA and PsA who started their first anti-TNFα agent was conducted for 24 months(M). Sociodemographic data, laboratory findings, disease activity and physical function scores were collected at baseline, 12M and 24M. To examine the differences between the groups with and without ANA seroconversion, independent samples t-tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests and chi-square tests were performed. Linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of ANA seroconversion on the clinical response to treatment.

Results: A total of 432 patients with RA (N=185), axSpA (N=171) and PsA (N=66) were included. ANA seroconversion rate at 24M was 34.6%, 64.3% and 63.6% for RA, axSpA and PsA, respectively. Regarding sociodemographic and clinical data in RA and PsA patients, no statistically significant differences between groups with and without ANA seroconversion were found. In axSpA patients, ANA seroconversion was more frequent in patients with higher body mass index (p=0.017) and significantly less frequent in patients treated with etanercept (p=0.01). Regarding disease activity, DAS28 for RA patients and ASDAS-CRP for axSpA patients were significantly higher in ANA seroconversion group at 12M (p=0.017 and p=0.009, respectively). For PsA patients, CDAI was significantly higher in ANA seroconversion group at 24M (p=0.043). Overall switching rate of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) was significantly higher in the ANA seroconversion group over time (p=0.025). For RA patients, ANA seroconversion predicted DAS28 (β=-0.21, 95%CI[-1.86;-0.18], p=0.017) at 12M.

Conclusions: ANA seroconversion induced by anti-TNFα agents could interfere in clinical response of patients with rheumatic diseases. The presence of these autoantibodies can be considered as a potential predictor of poor treatment response and higher need for bDMARD switching over time.

Aim: To assess the predictive factors for a subsequent fragility fracture (FF) and mortality.

Methods: Retrospective monocentric study including patients observed at the emergency department (ED) of a referral hospital with a FF, between 1st January 2017 and 31st December 2018. Fractures events were identified through discharge codes using the 9th International Classification of Diseases codes and FF were adjudicated after revision of the clinical files. We identified 1673 patients with FF. After calculating a representative sample (95% confidence interval), 172 hip, 173 wrist and 112 vertebral fractures were included in the analysis. Their clinical files were reviewed until 31st December 2020. A multivariate analysis was performed in order to identify predictive factors for FF.

Results: Overall, during the follow-up period 76 patients (16.6%) had a new FF and 120 patients (26.3%) died. Multivariate analysis showed that previous visits to the ED due to falls (p=0.002) and malignancy (p=0.026) were independent risk factors for a new FF. The main predictors of mortality were age, hip fracture, oral corticosteroid treatment, normal or low BMI and cardiac, neurologic or chronic kidney disease.

Conclusions: FF are a very prevalent public health problem that can lead to significant morbidity and death. Certain comorbidities seem to be associated with new FF and increased mortality. There might be a substantial missed opportunity for intervention in these patients, namely in ED visits.