Radiology-Artificial Intelligence最新文献

Purpose To evaluate the robustness of an award-winning bone age deep learning (DL) model to extensive variations in image appearance. Materials and Methods In December 2021, the DL bone age model that won the 2017 RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Challenge was retrospectively evaluated using the RSNA validation set (1425 pediatric hand radiographs; internal test set in this study) and the Digital Hand Atlas (DHA) (1202 pediatric hand radiographs; external test set). Each test image underwent seven types of transformations (rotations, flips, brightness, contrast, inversion, laterality marker, and resolution) to represent a range of image appearances, many of which simulate real-world variations. Computational "stress tests" were performed by comparing the model's predictions on baseline and transformed images. Mean absolute differences (MADs) of predicted bone ages compared with radiologist-determined ground truth on baseline versus transformed images were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. The proportion of clinically significant errors (CSEs) was compared using McNemar tests. Results There was no evidence of a difference in MAD of the model on the two baseline test sets (RSNA = 6.8 months, DHA = 6.9 months; P = .05), indicating good model generalization to external data. Except for the RSNA dataset images with an appended radiologic laterality marker (P = .86), there were significant differences in MAD for both the DHA and RSNA datasets among other transformation groups (rotations, flips, brightness, contrast, inversion, and resolution). There were significant differences in proportion of CSEs for 57% of the image transformations (19 of 33) performed on the DHA dataset. Conclusion Although an award-winning pediatric bone age DL model generalized well to curated external images, it had inconsistent predictions on images that had undergone simple transformations reflective of several real-world variations in image appearance. Keywords: Pediatrics, Hand, Convolutional Neural Network, Radiography Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024 See also commentary by Faghani and Erickson in this issue.

Purpose To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for humeral tumor detection on chest radiographs (CRs) and evaluate the impact on reader performance. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 14 709 CRs (January 2000 to December 2021) were collected from 13 468 patients, including CT-proven normal (n = 13 116) and humeral tumor (n = 1593) cases. The data were divided into training and test groups. A novel training method called false-positive activation area reduction (FPAR) was introduced to enhance the diagnostic performance by focusing on the humeral region. The AI program and 10 radiologists were assessed using holdout test set 1, wherein the radiologists were tested twice (with and without AI test results). The performance of the AI system was evaluated using holdout test set 2, comprising 10 497 normal images. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were conducted for evaluating model performance. Results FPAR application in the AI program improved its performance compared with a conventional model based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.87 vs 0.82, P = .04). The proposed AI system also demonstrated improved tumor localization accuracy (80% vs 57%, P < .001). In holdout test set 2, the proposed AI system exhibited a false-positive rate of 2%. AI assistance improved the radiologists' sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy by 8.9%, 1.2%, and 3.5%, respectively (P < .05 for all). Conclusion The proposed AI tool incorporating FPAR improved humeral tumor detection on CRs and reduced false-positive results in tumor visualization. It may serve as a supportive diagnostic tool to alert radiologists about humeral abnormalities. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Conventional Radiography, Humerus, Machine Learning, Shoulder, Tumor Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Purpose To evaluate the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant for lung cancer screening on multinational clinical workflows. Materials and Methods An AI assistant for lung cancer screening was evaluated on two retrospective randomized multireader multicase studies where 627 (141 cancer-positive cases) low-dose chest CT cases were each read twice (with and without AI assistance) by experienced thoracic radiologists (six U.S.-based or six Japan-based radiologists), resulting in a total of 7524 interpretations. Positive cases were defined as those within 2 years before a pathology-confirmed lung cancer diagnosis. Negative cases were defined as those without any subsequent cancer diagnosis for at least 2 years and were enriched for a spectrum of diverse nodules. The studies measured the readers' level of suspicion (on a 0-100 scale), country-specific screening system scoring categories, and management recommendations. Evaluation metrics included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for level of suspicion and sensitivity and specificity of recall recommendations. Results With AI assistance, the radiologists' AUC increased by 0.023 (0.70 to 0.72; P = .02) for the U.S. study and by 0.023 (0.93 to 0.96; P = .18) for the Japan study. Scoring system specificity for actionable findings increased 5.5% (57% to 63%; P < .001) for the U.S. study and 6.7% (23% to 30%; P < .001) for the Japan study. There was no evidence of a difference in corresponding sensitivity between unassisted and AI-assisted reads for the U.S. (67.3% to 67.5%; P = .88) and Japan (98% to 100%; P > .99) studies. Corresponding stand-alone AI AUC system performance was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.81) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.97) for the U.S.- and Japan-based datasets, respectively. Conclusion The concurrent AI interface improved lung cancer screening specificity in both U.S.- and Japan-based reader studies, meriting further study in additional international screening environments. Keywords: Assistive Artificial Intelligence, Lung Cancer Screening, CT Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

See also the commentary by Sitek in this issue. Supplemental material is available for this article.

This study evaluated the ability of generative large language models (LLMs) to detect speech recognition errors in radiology reports. A dataset of 3233 CT and MRI reports was assessed by radiologists for speech recognition errors. Errors were categorized as clinically significant or not clinically significant. Performances of five generative LLMs-GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, text-davinci-003, Llama-v2-70B-chat, and Bard-were compared in detecting these errors, using manual error detection as the reference standard. Prompt engineering was used to optimize model performance. GPT-4 demonstrated high accuracy in detecting clinically significant errors (precision, 76.9%; recall, 100%; F1 score, 86.9%) and not clinically significant errors (precision, 93.9%; recall, 94.7%; F1 score, 94.3%). Text-davinci-003 achieved F1 scores of 72% and 46.6% for clinically significant and not clinically significant errors, respectively. GPT-3.5-turbo obtained 59.1% and 32.2% F1 scores, while Llama-v2-70B-chat scored 72.8% and 47.7%. Bard showed the lowest accuracy, with F1 scores of 47.5% and 20.9%. GPT-4 effectively identified challenging errors of nonsense phrases and internally inconsistent statements. Longer reports, resident dictation, and overnight shifts were associated with higher error rates. In conclusion, advanced generative LLMs show potential for automatic detection of speech recognition errors in radiology reports. Keywords: CT, Large Language Model, Machine Learning, MRI, Natural Language Processing, Radiology Reports, Speech, Unsupervised Learning Supplemental material is available for this article.

Purpose To develop a Weakly supervISed model DevelOpment fraMework (WISDOM) model to construct a lymph node (LN) diagnosis model for patients with rectal cancer (RC) that uses preoperative MRI data coupled with postoperative patient-level pathologic information. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, the WISDOM model was built using MRI (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging) and patient-level pathologic information (the number of postoperatively confirmed metastatic LNs and resected LNs) based on the data of patients with RC between January 2016 and November 2017. The incremental value of the model in assisting radiologists was investigated. The performances in binary and ternary N staging were evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the concordance index (C index), respectively. Results A total of 1014 patients (median age, 62 years; IQR, 54-68 years; 590 male) were analyzed, including the training cohort (n = 589) and internal test cohort (n = 146) from center 1 and two external test cohorts (cohort 1: 117; cohort 2: 162) from centers 2 and 3. The WISDOM model yielded an overall AUC of 0.81 and C index of 0.765, significantly outperforming junior radiologists (AUC = 0.69, P < .001; C index = 0.689, P < .001) and performing comparably with senior radiologists (AUC = 0.79, P = .21; C index = 0.788, P = .22). Moreover, the model significantly improved the performance of junior radiologists (AUC = 0.80, P < .001; C index = 0.798, P < .001) and senior radiologists (AUC = 0.88, P < .001; C index = 0.869, P < .001). Conclusion This study demonstrates the potential of WISDOM as a useful LN diagnosis method using routine rectal MRI data. The improved radiologist performance observed with model assistance highlights the potential clinical utility of WISDOM in practice. Keywords: MR Imaging, Abdomen/GI, Rectum, Computer Applications-Detection/Diagnosis Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.