首页 > 最新文献

Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego最新文献

英文 中文
Animals’ Mental Suffering Paradigm in Estonian Judicial and Media Environment 爱沙尼亚司法和媒体环境中的动物精神痛苦范式
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.19-25
M. Susi
In the European context, animal rights legislation is relying on human rights language, since it aims to protect the animals from mental suffring. The fact that a legal norm is not labelled as a human rights norm does not alter its content. This article also shows that in the Estonian judicial system the concept of animals deserving protection of their fundamental rights is accepted by default. The reasoning of court judgments indicates that the main reason for criminal sanction is the violation of animals fundamental right not to be killed or tortured. The article supports the thesis that it is clear that there is an urgent need to recognize the animal rights in legislation directly and the need of such application of these laws by courts; altogether with placing such conviction in public awareness.
在欧洲,动物权利立法依赖于人权语言,因为它旨在保护动物免受精神痛苦。一项法律规范没有被贴上人权规范的标签,这一事实并不改变其内容。该条还表明,在爱沙尼亚司法系统中,动物的基本权利应得到保护的概念是默认接受的。法院判决的推理表明,刑事制裁的主要原因是侵犯了动物不被杀害或虐待的基本权利。文章论证了在立法上直接承认动物权利的迫切需要和法院对动物权利的适用的迫切需要;同时让公众意识到这种信念。
{"title":"Animals’ Mental Suffering Paradigm in Estonian Judicial and Media Environment","authors":"M. Susi","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.19-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.19-25","url":null,"abstract":"In the European context, animal rights legislation is relying on human rights language, since it aims to protect the animals from mental suffring. The fact that a legal norm is not labelled as a human rights norm does not alter its content. This article also shows that in the Estonian judicial system the concept of animals deserving protection of their fundamental rights is accepted by default. The reasoning of court judgments indicates that the main reason for criminal sanction is the violation of animals fundamental right not to be killed or tortured. The article supports the thesis that it is clear that there is an urgent need to recognize the animal rights in legislation directly and the need of such application of these laws by courts; altogether with placing such conviction in public awareness.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126148903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Protected Areas of Rare Species of Birds` Breeding Ground: Peculiarities of Legal Regulation in Ukraine 珍稀鸟类繁殖地保护区:乌克兰法律法规的特殊性
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.181-98
Galyna Mikolayvna Levina
The article deals with the changes in the legislation of Ukraine during 2016–2018, which have become the impetus for a new stage of development of legal regulation and practice of creation of protected areas around the breeding ground of wild birds, in particular, with the changes to the Sanitary Rules in forests of Ukraine, approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of 27 July 1995 no. 555 (in the wording of the Decree no. 756 of 26 October 2016), according to which since 11 november 2016, it is prohibited in Ukraine to implement measures to improve the sanitary state of forests (i.e. selective and continuous forest sanitation, elimination of clogging; prevention of the occurrence and spread of pests and diseases of the forest, combatting them, etc.) around the breeding ground of birds of prey from the Red Book of Ukraine (radius of 500 m), black stork (radius of 1,000 m), the lekking ground of gullers, black grouses (radius of 300 m). The decree of the Ministry of ecology and natural Resources of Ukraine no. 557 “On additional Measures for the Conservation of Rare and endangered Species of animals and Plants” of 29 December 2016, Decree of State agency of Forest Resources of Ukraine no. 17 “On additional Measures for the Protection of Wild animals and Plants Recorded in the Red Book of Ukraine” dated 20 January 2017, and separate local acts (of local councils, national natural parks, forestry enterprises, etc.) are also studied. The conclusions of the study on the peculiarities of the national legal regulation and the practice of creating such preservation zones, their legal regimes and recommendations for the improvement of legislation in this area are presented.
本文涉及2016-2018年期间乌克兰立法的变化,这些变化已成为推动法律法规和在野生鸟类繁殖地周围建立保护区的实践发展的新阶段,特别是乌克兰内阁部长1995年7月27日批准的乌克兰森林卫生规则的变化。第555号法令的措辞2016年10月26日第756号法令),根据该法令,自2016年11月11日起,乌克兰禁止实施改善森林卫生状况的措施(即选择性和持续的森林卫生,消除堵塞;防止森林病虫害的发生和传播,与它们作斗争等),在乌克兰红皮书上的猛禽繁殖地(半径500米),黑鹳(半径1000米),海鸥的泄漏地,黑松鸡(半径300米)周围。乌克兰生态和自然资源部的法令557 . 2016年12月29日乌克兰国家森林资源机构第557号法令《关于保护珍稀和濒危动植物物种的补充措施》。17 2017年1月20日的“关于保护乌克兰红皮书中记录的野生动植物的补充措施”,以及单独的地方法案(地方议会,国家自然公园,林业企业等)也进行了研究。提出了国家法律法规的特殊性和建立保护区的实践的研究结论,其法律制度和改进这一领域立法的建议。
{"title":"Protected Areas of Rare Species of Birds` Breeding Ground: Peculiarities of Legal Regulation in Ukraine","authors":"Galyna Mikolayvna Levina","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.181-98","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.181-98","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the changes in the legislation of Ukraine during 2016–2018, which have become the impetus for a new stage of development of legal regulation and practice of creation of protected areas around the breeding ground of wild birds, in particular, with the changes to the Sanitary Rules in forests of Ukraine, approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of 27 July 1995 no. 555 (in the wording of the Decree no. 756 of 26 October 2016), according to which since 11 november 2016, it is prohibited in Ukraine to implement measures to improve the sanitary state of forests (i.e. selective and continuous forest sanitation, elimination of clogging; prevention of the occurrence and spread of pests and diseases of the forest, combatting them, etc.) around the breeding ground of birds of prey from the Red Book of Ukraine (radius of 500 m), black stork (radius of 1,000 m), the lekking ground of gullers, black grouses (radius of 300 m). The decree of the Ministry of ecology and natural Resources of Ukraine no. 557 “On additional Measures for the Conservation of Rare and endangered Species of animals and Plants” of 29 December 2016, Decree of State agency of Forest Resources of Ukraine no. 17 “On additional Measures for the Protection of Wild animals and Plants Recorded in the Red Book of Ukraine” dated 20 January 2017, and separate local acts (of local councils, national natural parks, forestry enterprises, etc.) are also studied. The conclusions of the study on the peculiarities of the national legal regulation and the practice of creating such preservation zones, their legal regimes and recommendations for the improvement of legislation in this area are presented.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132068832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
International Scientific Conference “Availability of Natural Resources. Legal Issues”, Lublin, 27 September 2018 国际科学会议“自然资源的可得性”。《法律问题》,卢布林,2018年9月27日
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.1133-138
Anna Haładyj, Hanna Spasowska-Czarny
{"title":"International Scientific Conference “Availability of Natural Resources. Legal Issues”, Lublin, 27 September 2018","authors":"Anna Haładyj, Hanna Spasowska-Czarny","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.1133-138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.1133-138","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115057125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Status of Animals in Ukraine and Poland 乌克兰和波兰动物的法律地位
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.159-70
R. Marusenko
The article deals with the analysis of animals’ legal status via examples of Polish and Ukrainian legislation. The examples of inaccurate usage of legal terminology is this sphere (concerning subjects and objects) are analyzed. Legislative attempts to assign the status of subjects of law to animals in Ukraine and Poland are discovered. Remarkable examples from world judicial practice are revealed. Historical parallels are shown. Conclusion of possible solutions taking into account present understanding of nature of law and the aim of proposed changes in legal regulation is made.
本文以波兰和乌克兰的立法为例,对动物的法律地位进行了分析。分析了在这一领域(涉及主体和客体)使用法律术语不准确的例子。在乌克兰和波兰,立法机构试图赋予动物法律主体的地位。揭示了世界司法实践中值得注意的例子。历史上有相似之处。考虑到目前对法律性质的理解和拟议的法律规则变化的目的,总结了可能的解决办法。
{"title":"Legal Status of Animals in Ukraine and Poland","authors":"R. Marusenko","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.159-70","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.159-70","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the analysis of animals’ legal status via examples of Polish and Ukrainian legislation. The examples of inaccurate usage of legal terminology is this sphere (concerning subjects and objects) are analyzed. Legislative attempts to assign the status of subjects of law to animals in Ukraine and Poland are discovered. Remarkable examples from world judicial practice are revealed. Historical parallels are shown. Conclusion of possible solutions taking into account present understanding of nature of law and the aim of proposed changes in legal regulation is made.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"30 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120980821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Features of Legal Regulation of Handling of Farm Animals During Slaughter in Ukraine 乌克兰屠宰过程中农场动物处理法律法规的特点
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.171-79
Iryna Siuiva
The article deals with the peculiarities of legal regulation of handling of farm animals during slaughter. On the basis of the analysis of Ukrainian legislation and international legislation, the requirements for the transportation of animals have been determined, taking into account their biological, species and individual characteristics, as well as the primary processing of animals and products obtained by slaughter. In the article particular attention is paid to the subject composition of the studied legal relations, the problems of applying humane methods of slaughter of farm animals and certain issues of legal responsibility in the sphere of handling animals during slaughter in Ukraine. The state of development of slaughter economy of producers of agrarian sector of Ukraine was studied. An estimation of the current state of functioning of slaughter points in Ukraine was carried out. Based on the generalization of the world and domestic experience, the directions of their development were proposed as a component of the market infrastructure. The conclusion was made about the need for the development of slaughter stations as an alternative to home slaughter of livestock intended for sale. The advantages and disadvantages of the prohibition of selling meat from home slaughter of livestock were analyzed. The ways of improving the system of state control in the field of food safety were proposed taking into account the requirements of the European Union and the socio-economic situation in Ukraine.
本文论述了屠宰过程中农场动物处理的法律规定的特殊性。在分析乌克兰立法和国际立法的基础上,考虑到动物的生物学、物种和个体特征,以及动物的初级加工和屠宰获得的产品,确定了动物运输的要求。本文特别关注所研究的法律关系的主体构成,适用人道屠宰农场动物方法的问题以及乌克兰屠宰期间处理动物领域的某些法律责任问题。对乌克兰农业部门生产者屠宰经济的发展状况进行了研究。对乌克兰境内屠宰点的目前运作状况进行了估计。在总结国内外经验的基础上,提出了市场基础设施的发展方向。得出的结论是,需要发展屠宰站,以替代供销售的牲畜的家庭屠宰。分析了禁止家庭屠宰肉品销售的利弊。在考虑到欧洲联盟的要求和乌克兰的社会经济状况的情况下,提出了改善食品安全领域国家控制制度的方法。
{"title":"Features of Legal Regulation of Handling of Farm Animals During Slaughter in Ukraine","authors":"Iryna Siuiva","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.171-79","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.171-79","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the peculiarities of legal regulation of handling of farm animals during slaughter. On the basis of the analysis of Ukrainian legislation and international legislation, the requirements for the transportation of animals have been determined, taking into account their biological, species and individual characteristics, as well as the primary processing of animals and products obtained by slaughter. In the article particular attention is paid to the subject composition of the studied legal relations, the problems of applying humane methods of slaughter of farm animals and certain issues of legal responsibility in the sphere of handling animals during slaughter in Ukraine. The state of development of slaughter economy of producers of agrarian sector of Ukraine was studied. An estimation of the current state of functioning of slaughter points in Ukraine was carried out. Based on the generalization of the world and domestic experience, the directions of their development were proposed as a component of the market infrastructure. The conclusion was made about the need for the development of slaughter stations as an alternative to home slaughter of livestock intended for sale. The advantages and disadvantages of the prohibition of selling meat from home slaughter of livestock were analyzed. The ways of improving the system of state control in the field of food safety were proposed taking into account the requirements of the European Union and the socio-economic situation in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124807972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on the Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 20 June 2018 (II OSK 3084/17) 对最高行政法院2018年6月20日判决的评注(II OSK 3084/17)
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.1121-130
A. Ostrowska, Jakub Polanowski
On 13 March 2014, the Lublin City Council, acting pursuant to Art. 40(2) point 4 and Art. 41(1) of the local Government Act of 8 March 1990 (lGA), adopted resolution no. 1017/XXXIX/2014 on the introduction of the regulations for the use of the Saxon Garden in Lublin. Th regulations are attached to the resolution. Th purpose of introducing the regulations is to determine up-to-date forms of use of the Garden, taking into account its historical value (§ 2). In § 5 of the Annex no. 1 of the regulations, a provision was introduced, according to which dogs are not allowed in the area of the Saxon Garden in Lublin, with the exception of guide dogs. In the judgement commented herein the Supreme Administrative Court declared § 5 of the Annex no. 1 invalid. The commentary contains arguments against the court’s position.
2014年3月13日,卢布林市议会根据1990年3月8日《地方政府法》第40条第2款第4点和第41条第1款的规定,通过了第481号决议。关于引入卢布林撒克逊花园使用条例的第1017/XXXIX/2014号决议。章程附在决议后。引入该条例的目的是考虑到其历史价值(§2),确定花园的最新使用形式。在条例1中,引入了一项规定,根据该规定,除导盲犬外,卢布林的撒克逊花园地区不允许携带狗。最高行政法院在判决书中宣布了附件第5条。1无效。评注中有反对法院立场的论据。
{"title":"Commentary on the Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 20 June 2018 (II OSK 3084/17)","authors":"A. Ostrowska, Jakub Polanowski","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.1121-130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.1121-130","url":null,"abstract":"On 13 March 2014, the Lublin City Council, acting pursuant to Art. 40(2) point 4 and Art. 41(1) of the local Government Act of 8 March 1990 (lGA), adopted resolution no. 1017/XXXIX/2014 on the introduction of the regulations for the use of the Saxon Garden in Lublin. Th regulations are attached to the resolution. Th purpose of introducing the regulations is to determine up-to-date forms of use of the Garden, taking into account its historical value (§ 2). In § 5 of the Annex no. 1 of the regulations, a provision was introduced, according to which dogs are not allowed in the area of the Saxon Garden in Lublin, with the exception of guide dogs. In the judgement commented herein the Supreme Administrative Court declared § 5 of the Annex no. 1 invalid. The commentary contains arguments against the court’s position.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114852774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Corruption Risks in the Field of Public-Legal Protection of Animals: Case of Ukraine 动物公法保护领域的腐败风险:以乌克兰为例
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.1109-118
Tetyana Kolomoyets, O. Makarenkov
The article deals with the corruption risks in the field of exercising the powers of public-legal protection of animals. It is proved that such risks represent a system of spiritual, cultural, legal, organizational, economic, political and other factors that enable and/or encourage officials of public administration bodies to commit corruption offenses while exercising their authority in the field of animal protection. The essence of these factors is outlined, the specifics of which are determined by the nature of the subject of legal protection, the content and subjects of the implementation of public authority powers, the hierarchical level of their implementation. Wild and domestic (pets and homeless) animals in Ukraine are protected by the structures of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the state service of Ukraine for Food safety and Consumer Protection, the state Forestry Agency of Ukraine and the state Fisheries Industry Agency of Ukraine, as well as local public authorities and community groups. Corruption risks are specified on examples of these bodies, including those that make use of their discretionary powers or those which are not granted adequate powers. It has been found that these risks are also due to structural deficiencies, a low level of legal culture among officials and their socioeconomic and/or legal insecurity.
本文论述了动物公法保护权力行使中存在的腐败风险。事实证明,这种风险是一种精神、文化、法律、组织、经济、政治和其他因素构成的系统,使公共行政机构的官员在行使其在动物保护领域的权力时能够和/或鼓励腐败犯罪。概述了这些因素的本质,具体取决于法律保护主体的性质、公权力权力实施的内容和主体、权力实施的层次层次。乌克兰的野生动物和家养动物(宠物和流浪动物)受到乌克兰生态和自然资源部、乌克兰食品安全和消费者保护国家服务机构、乌克兰国家林业局和乌克兰国家渔业局以及地方公共当局和社区团体的保护。在这些机构的例子中,包括那些使用其自由裁量权或没有获得足够权力的机构,列出了腐败风险。研究发现,这些风险也是由于结构性缺陷、官员的法律文化水平较低以及他们的社会经济和/或法律不安全造成的。
{"title":"Corruption Risks in the Field of Public-Legal Protection of Animals: Case of Ukraine","authors":"Tetyana Kolomoyets, O. Makarenkov","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.1109-118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.1109-118","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the corruption risks in the field of exercising the powers of public-legal protection of animals. It is proved that such risks represent a system of spiritual, cultural, legal, organizational, economic, political and other factors that enable and/or encourage officials of public administration bodies to commit corruption offenses while exercising their authority in the field of animal protection. The essence of these factors is outlined, the specifics of which are determined by the nature of the subject of legal protection, the content and subjects of the implementation of public authority powers, the hierarchical level of their implementation. Wild and domestic (pets and homeless) animals in Ukraine are protected by the structures of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the state service of Ukraine for Food safety and Consumer Protection, the state Forestry Agency of Ukraine and the state Fisheries Industry Agency of Ukraine, as well as local public authorities and community groups. Corruption risks are specified on examples of these bodies, including those that make use of their discretionary powers or those which are not granted adequate powers. It has been found that these risks are also due to structural deficiencies, a low level of legal culture among officials and their socioeconomic and/or legal insecurity.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116809620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Legal Issues of Appropriate Assessment Procedure for the Proposed Activities, Installations, Plans and Programmes for the Types of Activities That Have or are Likely to Have an Adverse Impact on the Emerald Sites 对祖母绿遗址产生或可能产生不利影响的活动、装置、计划和方案的拟议活动、装置、计划和方案的适当评估程序的法律问题
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.127-40
T. Tretiak
The article is the result of drafting work aimed at Ukrainian legislation approximation to EU law experience in the field of the protection of flora and fauna. Th article deals with the issues arisen before the authors of the draft Law of Ukraine “On Emerald Sites”, concerning: the kind of procedure for assessing the permissibility for the types of activities, installations, plans and programmes that are likely to have an adverse impact on the Emerald sites (sites that are necessary for the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora); the functions of appropriate assessment procedure for the proposed activities, installations, plans and programmes that are likely to have an adverse impact on the Emerald sites, etc. The author analyses the ideas enshrined in the draft Law of Ukraine “On Emerald Sites” and suggests his own proposals on this subject. Ths study may be useful for facilitating the legislative process in the field of decision-making process, property rights protection and Emerald sites preserving.
该条款是起草工作的结果,旨在使乌克兰立法接近欧盟在保护动植物领域的法律经验。该条涉及乌克兰“关于祖母绿遗址”法草案的起草者所面临的问题,涉及:评估可能对祖母绿遗址(保护自然生境和野生动植物所必需的遗址)产生不利影响的活动、设施、计划和方案的可容许性的程序;对可能对翡翠遗址产生不利影响的拟议活动、装置、计划和方案的适当评估程序的功能等。作者分析了乌克兰“关于翡翠遗址”法草案所体现的思想,并就这一问题提出了自己的建议。该研究对促进决策过程、产权保护和祖母绿遗址保护等领域的立法进程具有一定的参考价值。
{"title":"The Legal Issues of Appropriate Assessment Procedure for the Proposed Activities, Installations, Plans and Programmes for the Types of Activities That Have or are Likely to Have an Adverse Impact on the Emerald Sites","authors":"T. Tretiak","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.127-40","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.127-40","url":null,"abstract":"The article is the result of drafting work aimed at Ukrainian legislation approximation to EU law experience in the field of the protection of flora and fauna. Th article deals with the issues arisen before the authors of the draft Law of Ukraine “On Emerald Sites”, concerning: the kind of procedure for assessing the permissibility for the types of activities, installations, plans and programmes that are likely to have an adverse impact on the Emerald sites (sites that are necessary for the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora); the functions of appropriate assessment procedure for the proposed activities, installations, plans and programmes that are likely to have an adverse impact on the Emerald sites, etc. The author analyses the ideas enshrined in the draft Law of Ukraine “On Emerald Sites” and suggests his own proposals on this subject. Ths study may be useful for facilitating the legislative process in the field of decision-making process, property rights protection and Emerald sites preserving.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133929692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Legal Basis For Control in the Sphere of Use And Protection of the Animal World in Ukraine 乌克兰动物世界使用和保护领域控制的法律依据
Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI: 10.17951/PPA.2018.199-108
S. Marchenko
The article is devoted to the legal bases for control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world. legislative support of environmental control in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife was considered. Th system and powers of state authorities and bodies of local self-government concerning the implementation of the control function in the field of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world were investigated. On the basis of the analysis of legal literature and legislation of Ukraine, the peculiarities of legal regulation of control in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife were singled out, the classifiation of environmental control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world by subjects of its implementation and the areas of the use of animal objects has been made. Particular attention was paid to the implementation of control in the field of fisheries as one of the types of agricultural production. It was concluded that control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife is one of the most important functions of the state in ensuring the right to an environment that is safe for life and health and compensation for damage caused by violation of this right, stipulated in Art. 50 of the constitution of Ukraine. Proper regulation of control activities in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife can become a guarantee of observance of the norms of the current legislation, and substantially balance the relationship between the subject and the object of control.
这篇文章专门讨论在动物世界的使用、繁殖和保护领域进行控制的法律依据。会议审议了在野生动物使用、繁殖和保护领域对环境控制的立法支持。调查了国家当局和地方自治机构在动物世界的使用、繁殖和保护领域实施控制职能的制度和权力。在对乌克兰法律文献和立法进行分析的基础上,指出了野生动物使用、繁殖和保护领域管制的法律规定的特点,并按实施对象和动物物品使用领域对动物世界的使用、繁殖和保护领域的环境管制进行了分类。特别注意在作为农业生产类型之一的渔业领域实施管制。结论是,根据《乌克兰宪法》第50条的规定,在野生动物的使用、繁殖和保护领域进行控制是国家在确保享有对生命和健康安全的环境权利和赔偿因侵犯这一权利而造成的损害方面最重要的职能之一。对野生动物的使用、繁殖和保护领域的管制活动进行适当的管制,可以成为遵守现行立法规范的保证,并在实质上平衡管制主体和管制客体之间的关系。
{"title":"The Legal Basis For Control in the Sphere of Use And Protection of the Animal World in Ukraine","authors":"S. Marchenko","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.199-108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.199-108","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the legal bases for control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world. legislative support of environmental control in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife was considered. Th system and powers of state authorities and bodies of local self-government concerning the implementation of the control function in the field of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world were investigated. On the basis of the analysis of legal literature and legislation of Ukraine, the peculiarities of legal regulation of control in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife were singled out, the classifiation of environmental control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world by subjects of its implementation and the areas of the use of animal objects has been made. Particular attention was paid to the implementation of control in the field of fisheries as one of the types of agricultural production. It was concluded that control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife is one of the most important functions of the state in ensuring the right to an environment that is safe for life and health and compensation for damage caused by violation of this right, stipulated in Art. 50 of the constitution of Ukraine. Proper regulation of control activities in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife can become a guarantee of observance of the norms of the current legislation, and substantially balance the relationship between the subject and the object of control.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131954931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1