Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000923
Thomas Kötter, Solveig Carmienke, Wolfram J Herrmann
Objective: In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of GP trainees, heads of departments and GP trainers regarding the combination of research and GP training.
Methods: We conducted a web-based survey with the heads of all German departments of General Practice, GP trainees who also conduct research and their GP trainers. The questionnaires consisted of open and closed questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods.
Results: 28 heads of GP departments and 20 GP trainees responded. The trainees were mostly very satisfied with their situation as a trainee. However, the trainees considered the combination of research and GP training as difficult. The respondents name as problems the coordination of multiple jobs and the lack of credibility given to research in General Practice. They name as solutions research-enabling training programs and uniform requirements in training regarding research.
Conclusion: The combination of GP training and scientific research activity is perceived as difficult. However, well-organized and designed programs can improve the quality of the combination.
{"title":"Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in general practice. A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Thomas Kötter, Solveig Carmienke, Wolfram J Herrmann","doi":"10.3205/zma000923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of GP trainees, heads of departments and GP trainers regarding the combination of research and GP training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a web-based survey with the heads of all German departments of General Practice, GP trainees who also conduct research and their GP trainers. The questionnaires consisted of open and closed questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28 heads of GP departments and 20 GP trainees responded. The trainees were mostly very satisfied with their situation as a trainee. However, the trainees considered the combination of research and GP training as difficult. The respondents name as problems the coordination of multiple jobs and the lack of credibility given to research in General Practice. They name as solutions research-enabling training programs and uniform requirements in training regarding research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of GP training and scientific research activity is perceived as difficult. However, well-organized and designed programs can improve the quality of the combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000923","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000927
Bert Huenges, Markus Gulich, Klaus Böhme, Folkert Fehr, Irmgard Streitlein-Böhme, Viktor Rüttermann, Erika Baum, Wilhelm-Bernhard Niebling, Herbert Rusche
During their studies to become medical professionals, all students are obliged to become familiar with various aspects of primary care. The aim is to provide all students with a high quality training which ensures the best possible cooperation across all sectors of the medical system. Primary care comprises the primary use of the medical service by an unfiltered set of patients as well as continued patient care--including home-care. This position paper was developed together with representatives of the German Society of University Teachers of General Practice (GHA), the German Society for Ambulatory General Paediatrics (DGAAP), the German Society of General Practice and Family Medicine (DEGAM) and the German Society for Internal Medicine (DGIM). It includes recommendations for teaching in the field of primary care in four different types of internships such as preclinical work experience ("Hospitation"), 4-week clinical traineeships of a casual nature ("Famulatur") and 2-week courses of structured and assessed clinical training ("Blockpraktikum") as well as a broad-based 4-month elective clinical placement in the final year (known as a practical year, "PJ"). The recommendations encompass structural and process criteria for internships in different general practices. In addition, for the first time recommendations for teaching on campus--in the fields of general medicine, paediatrics, numerous cross-sectional areas and other clinical fields, but also for clinical skills training--are set down here. In this position paper the intention is to demonstrate the possible ways in which more aspects of primary care could be integrated into undergraduate medical training.
{"title":"Recommendations for undergraduate training in the primary care sector--position paper of the GMA-Primary Care Committee.","authors":"Bert Huenges, Markus Gulich, Klaus Böhme, Folkert Fehr, Irmgard Streitlein-Böhme, Viktor Rüttermann, Erika Baum, Wilhelm-Bernhard Niebling, Herbert Rusche","doi":"10.3205/zma000927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During their studies to become medical professionals, all students are obliged to become familiar with various aspects of primary care. The aim is to provide all students with a high quality training which ensures the best possible cooperation across all sectors of the medical system. Primary care comprises the primary use of the medical service by an unfiltered set of patients as well as continued patient care--including home-care. This position paper was developed together with representatives of the German Society of University Teachers of General Practice (GHA), the German Society for Ambulatory General Paediatrics (DGAAP), the German Society of General Practice and Family Medicine (DEGAM) and the German Society for Internal Medicine (DGIM). It includes recommendations for teaching in the field of primary care in four different types of internships such as preclinical work experience (\"Hospitation\"), 4-week clinical traineeships of a casual nature (\"Famulatur\") and 2-week courses of structured and assessed clinical training (\"Blockpraktikum\") as well as a broad-based 4-month elective clinical placement in the final year (known as a practical year, \"PJ\"). The recommendations encompass structural and process criteria for internships in different general practices. In addition, for the first time recommendations for teaching on campus--in the fields of general medicine, paediatrics, numerous cross-sectional areas and other clinical fields, but also for clinical skills training--are set down here. In this position paper the intention is to demonstrate the possible ways in which more aspects of primary care could be integrated into undergraduate medical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000927","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000921
D Huhn, F Resch, R Duelli, A Möltner, J Huber, K Karimian Jazi, A Amr, W Eckart, W Herzog, C Nikendei
Introduction: Medical students with a migration background face several specific problems during their studies. International surveys show first indications that this group of students performs worse in written, oral or practical exams. However, so far, nothing is known about the performance of international students in written pre-clinical tests as well as in pre-clinical State Examinations for German-speaking countries.
Method: A descriptive, retrospective analysis of the exam performances of medical students in the pre-clinical part of their studies was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine of Heidelberg in for the year 2012. Performance in written tests of the final exams in the second (N=276), third (N=292) and fourth semester (N=285) were compared between German students, students from EU countries and students from non-EU countries. Same comparison was drawn for the performance in the oral exam of the First State Examination in the period from 2009 - 2012 (N=1137).
Results: German students performed significantly better than students with a non-EU migration background both in all written exams and in the oral State Examination (all p<.05). The performance of students with an EU migration background was significantly better than that of students with a non-EU background in the written exam at the end of the third and fourth semester (p<.05). Furthermore, German students completed the oral exam of the First State Examination significantly earlier than students with a non-EU migration background (<.01).
Discussion: Due to its poorer performance in written and oral examinations and its simultaneously longer duration of study, the group of non-German medical students with a country of origin outside of the European Union has to be seen as a high-risk group among students with a migration background. For this group, there is an urgent need for early support to prepare for written and oral examinations.
{"title":"Examination performances of German and international medical students in the preclinical studying-term--a descriptive study.","authors":"D Huhn, F Resch, R Duelli, A Möltner, J Huber, K Karimian Jazi, A Amr, W Eckart, W Herzog, C Nikendei","doi":"10.3205/zma000921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical students with a migration background face several specific problems during their studies. International surveys show first indications that this group of students performs worse in written, oral or practical exams. However, so far, nothing is known about the performance of international students in written pre-clinical tests as well as in pre-clinical State Examinations for German-speaking countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive, retrospective analysis of the exam performances of medical students in the pre-clinical part of their studies was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine of Heidelberg in for the year 2012. Performance in written tests of the final exams in the second (N=276), third (N=292) and fourth semester (N=285) were compared between German students, students from EU countries and students from non-EU countries. Same comparison was drawn for the performance in the oral exam of the First State Examination in the period from 2009 - 2012 (N=1137).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>German students performed significantly better than students with a non-EU migration background both in all written exams and in the oral State Examination (all p<.05). The performance of students with an EU migration background was significantly better than that of students with a non-EU background in the written exam at the end of the third and fourth semester (p<.05). Furthermore, German students completed the oral exam of the First State Examination significantly earlier than students with a non-EU migration background (<.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Due to its poorer performance in written and oral examinations and its simultaneously longer duration of study, the group of non-German medical students with a country of origin outside of the European Union has to be seen as a high-risk group among students with a migration background. For this group, there is an urgent need for early support to prepare for written and oral examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000921","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000925
Tanja Pander, Severin Pinilla, Konstantinos Dimitriadis, Martin R Fischer
Background: The vogue of social media has changed interpersonal communication as well as learning and teaching opportunities in medical education. The most popular social media tool is Facebook. Its features provide potentially useful support for the education of medical students but it also means that some new challenges will have to be faced.
Aims: This review aimed to find out how Facebook has been integrated into medical education. A systematical review of the current literature and grade of evidence is provided, research gaps are identified, links to prior reviews are drawn and implications for the future are discussed.
Method: The authors searched six databases. Inclusion criteria were defined and the authors independently reviewed the search results. The key information of the articles included was methodically abstracted and coded, synthesized and discussed in the categories study design, study participants'phase of medical education and study content.
Results: 16 articles met all inclusion criteria. 45-96% of health care professionals in all phases of their medical education have a Facebook profile. Most studies focused on Facebook and digital professionalism. Unprofessional behavior and privacy violations occurred in 0.02% to 16%. In terms of learning and teaching environment, Facebook is well accepted by medical students. It is used to prepare for exams, share online material, discuss clinical cases, organize face-to-face sessions and exchange information on clerkships. A few educational materials to teach Facebook professionalism were positively evaluated. There seems to be no conclusive evidence as to whether medical students benefit from Facebook as a learning environment on higher competence levels.
Discussion: Facebook influences a myriad of aspects of health care professionals, particularly at undergraduate and graduate level in medical education. Despite an increasing number of interventions, there is a lack of conclusive evidence in terms of its educational effectiveness. Furthermore, we suggest that digital professionalism be integrated in established and emerging competency-based catalogues.
{"title":"The use of Facebook in medical education--a literature review.","authors":"Tanja Pander, Severin Pinilla, Konstantinos Dimitriadis, Martin R Fischer","doi":"10.3205/zma000925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The vogue of social media has changed interpersonal communication as well as learning and teaching opportunities in medical education. The most popular social media tool is Facebook. Its features provide potentially useful support for the education of medical students but it also means that some new challenges will have to be faced.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aimed to find out how Facebook has been integrated into medical education. A systematical review of the current literature and grade of evidence is provided, research gaps are identified, links to prior reviews are drawn and implications for the future are discussed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors searched six databases. Inclusion criteria were defined and the authors independently reviewed the search results. The key information of the articles included was methodically abstracted and coded, synthesized and discussed in the categories study design, study participants'phase of medical education and study content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 articles met all inclusion criteria. 45-96% of health care professionals in all phases of their medical education have a Facebook profile. Most studies focused on Facebook and digital professionalism. Unprofessional behavior and privacy violations occurred in 0.02% to 16%. In terms of learning and teaching environment, Facebook is well accepted by medical students. It is used to prepare for exams, share online material, discuss clinical cases, organize face-to-face sessions and exchange information on clerkships. A few educational materials to teach Facebook professionalism were positively evaluated. There seems to be no conclusive evidence as to whether medical students benefit from Facebook as a learning environment on higher competence levels.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Facebook influences a myriad of aspects of health care professionals, particularly at undergraduate and graduate level in medical education. Despite an increasing number of interventions, there is a lack of conclusive evidence in terms of its educational effectiveness. Furthermore, we suggest that digital professionalism be integrated in established and emerging competency-based catalogues.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000925","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000926
Jana Jünger, Ingo Just
The practice of assessing student performance in human, dental and veterinary medicine at universities in German-speaking countries has undergone significant changes in the past decade. Turning the focus to practical requirements regarding medical practice during undergraduate study away from an often theory-dominated curriculum, the academic scrutiny of the basics of teaching medical knowledge and skills, and amendments to legislation, all require ongoing adjustments to curricula and the ways in which assessments are done during undergraduate medical education. To establish quality standards, the Gesellschaft für medizinische Ausbildung (GMA German Society for Medical Education) reached a consensus in 2008 on recommendations for administering medical school-specific exams which have now been updated and approved by the GMA assessments committee, together with the Medizinischer Fakultätentag (MFT German Association of Medical Faculties), as recommendations for the administration of high-quality assessments.
在过去十年中,德语国家的大学评估学生在人类医学、牙科和兽医学方面的表现的做法发生了重大变化。在本科学习期间,将重点从通常以理论为主导的课程转向医学实践的实践要求,对医学知识和技能教学基础的学术审查,以及立法的修订,都需要不断调整课程和本科医学教育期间的评估方式。为了确立质量标准,德国医学教育协会(Gesellschaft f r medizinische Ausbildung)于2008年就管理医学院特定考试的建议达成了共识,这些建议现已由德国医学教育协会(GMA)评估委员会与Medizinischer Fakultätentag (MFT德国医学院协会)更新并批准,作为管理高质量评估的建议。
{"title":"Recommendations of the German Society for Medical Education and the German Association of Medical Faculties regarding university-specific assessments during the study of human, dental and veterinary medicine.","authors":"Jana Jünger, Ingo Just","doi":"10.3205/zma000926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000926","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The practice of assessing student performance in human, dental and veterinary medicine at universities in German-speaking countries has undergone significant changes in the past decade. Turning the focus to practical requirements regarding medical practice during undergraduate study away from an often theory-dominated curriculum, the academic scrutiny of the basics of teaching medical knowledge and skills, and amendments to legislation, all require ongoing adjustments to curricula and the ways in which assessments are done during undergraduate medical education. To establish quality standards, the Gesellschaft für medizinische Ausbildung (GMA German Society for Medical Education) reached a consensus in 2008 on recommendations for administering medical school-specific exams which have now been updated and approved by the GMA assessments committee, together with the Medizinischer Fakultätentag (MFT German Association of Medical Faculties), as recommendations for the administration of high-quality assessments. </p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000926","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000924
Kristine Jahnke, Marcel Stephan Kremer, Carsten Oliver Schmidt, Michael M Kochen, Jean-François Chenot
Objective: Early contact of medical students with pharmaceutical promotion has been shown in many international studies. We assessed the frequency and places of contact of German medical students to pharmaceutical promotion and examined their attitudes toward pharmaceutical promotional activities.
Methods: This cross-sectional survey was based on a self-developed questionnaire. It was distributed to all clinical students at the University of Goettingen Medical School in 2010. A 4-point rating scale was used to assess the attitudes toward different statements regarding pharmaceutical promotion.
Results: The overall response rate was 55% (702/1287). The proportion of students with direct contact to pharmaceutical sales representatives increased from 21% in the first clinical year up to 77% in the final year. 60% were contacted during their elective clerkship. 80% had accepted promotional gifts. 86% stated their prescribing behavior to be unsusceptible to the influence of accepting promotional gifts. However, 35% of the unsusceptible students assumed doctors to be susceptible. Almost all (90%) reported that dealing with pharmaceutical promotion was never addressed during lectures and 65% did not feel well prepared for interactions with the pharmaceutical industry. 19% agreed to prohibit contacts between medical students and the pharmaceutical industry.
Conclusions: German medical students get in contact with pharmaceutical promotion early and frequently. There is limited awareness for associated conflicts of interests. Medical schools need to regulate contacts and incorporate the topic in their curriculum to prepare students for interactions with the pharmaceutical industry.
{"title":"German medical students' exposure and attitudes toward pharmaceutical promotion: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Kristine Jahnke, Marcel Stephan Kremer, Carsten Oliver Schmidt, Michael M Kochen, Jean-François Chenot","doi":"10.3205/zma000924","DOIUrl":"10.3205/zma000924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early contact of medical students with pharmaceutical promotion has been shown in many international studies. We assessed the frequency and places of contact of German medical students to pharmaceutical promotion and examined their attitudes toward pharmaceutical promotional activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey was based on a self-developed questionnaire. It was distributed to all clinical students at the University of Goettingen Medical School in 2010. A 4-point rating scale was used to assess the attitudes toward different statements regarding pharmaceutical promotion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate was 55% (702/1287). The proportion of students with direct contact to pharmaceutical sales representatives increased from 21% in the first clinical year up to 77% in the final year. 60% were contacted during their elective clerkship. 80% had accepted promotional gifts. 86% stated their prescribing behavior to be unsusceptible to the influence of accepting promotional gifts. However, 35% of the unsusceptible students assumed doctors to be susceptible. Almost all (90%) reported that dealing with pharmaceutical promotion was never addressed during lectures and 65% did not feel well prepared for interactions with the pharmaceutical industry. 19% agreed to prohibit contacts between medical students and the pharmaceutical industry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>German medical students get in contact with pharmaceutical promotion early and frequently. There is limited awareness for associated conflicts of interests. Medical schools need to regulate contacts and incorporate the topic in their curriculum to prepare students for interactions with the pharmaceutical industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e1/27/ZMA-31-32.PMC4152996.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000918
Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari, Mridul Agrawal, Lara Wahlster
The final year of medical school has a unique role for introducing students to their future responsibilities and challenges. At many medical schools, electives at an accredited institution abroad are a common part of the student's final year experience. International electives provide an opportunity for a personal and academic experience that will often create new perspectives on clinical medicine and research, medical education and healthcare policy. In this article the authors reflect on their experience as elective students abroad and discuss the contribution of international electives to the constant development and progress of local final year rotations. They identify key areas for improving final year electives and outline essential features for a valuable and successful final year elective.
{"title":"International electives in the final year of German medical school education--a student's perspective.","authors":"Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari, Mridul Agrawal, Lara Wahlster","doi":"10.3205/zma000918","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000918","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The final year of medical school has a unique role for introducing students to their future responsibilities and challenges. At many medical schools, electives at an accredited institution abroad are a common part of the student's final year experience. International electives provide an opportunity for a personal and academic experience that will often create new perspectives on clinical medicine and research, medical education and healthcare policy. In this article the authors reflect on their experience as elective students abroad and discuss the contribution of international electives to the constant development and progress of local final year rotations. They identify key areas for improving final year electives and outline essential features for a valuable and successful final year elective. </p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000918","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000920
Patricia Raes, Daniel Bauer, Franziska Schöppe, Martin R Fischer
Objectives: Medical education is gaining in significance internationally. A growing interest in the field has been observed in German-speaking countries (Austria, Germany, Switzerland) since the early 2000s. This interest is not, however, reflected in an increase in the number of publications on medical education of German-speaking authors in international professional journals. The following investigation examines the potential use of active participant numbers of German-speaking researchers at AMEE conferences as a means of measuring said development.
Methods: The AMEE conference proceedings from the categories poster presentations, short communications, research papers and plenary presentations from the years 2005-2013 were examined for evidence of Austrian, German and Swiss participation. The abstracts were subsequently analysed in terms of content and categorised according to study design, methodology, object of study, and research topic.
Results: Of the 9,446 analysed abstracts, 549 contributions show at least one first, last or co-author from Austria, Germany or Switzerland. The absolute number of contributions per conference varied between 44 in 2010 and 77 in 2013. The percentage fluctuated between 10% in 2005 and 4.1% in 2010. From the year 2010 onwards, however, participation increased continually. The research was predominantly descriptive (62.7%). Studies on fundamental questions of teaching and learning (clarification studies) were less frequent (4.0%). For the most part, quantitative methods (51.9%) were implemented in addressing subjects such as learning and teaching methods (33%), evaluation and assessment (22.4%) or curriculum development (14.4%). The study population was usually comprised of students (52.5%).
Conclusions: The number of contributions from Austria, Germany and Switzerland peak at the beginning and at the end of the evaluated period of time. A continual increase in active participation since 2005 was not observed. These observations do not reflect the actual increase of interest in medical education research in German-speaking countries.
{"title":"The active participation of German-speaking countries in conferences of the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) between 2005 and 2013: a reflection of the development of medical education research?","authors":"Patricia Raes, Daniel Bauer, Franziska Schöppe, Martin R Fischer","doi":"10.3205/zma000920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medical education is gaining in significance internationally. A growing interest in the field has been observed in German-speaking countries (Austria, Germany, Switzerland) since the early 2000s. This interest is not, however, reflected in an increase in the number of publications on medical education of German-speaking authors in international professional journals. The following investigation examines the potential use of active participant numbers of German-speaking researchers at AMEE conferences as a means of measuring said development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AMEE conference proceedings from the categories poster presentations, short communications, research papers and plenary presentations from the years 2005-2013 were examined for evidence of Austrian, German and Swiss participation. The abstracts were subsequently analysed in terms of content and categorised according to study design, methodology, object of study, and research topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 9,446 analysed abstracts, 549 contributions show at least one first, last or co-author from Austria, Germany or Switzerland. The absolute number of contributions per conference varied between 44 in 2010 and 77 in 2013. The percentage fluctuated between 10% in 2005 and 4.1% in 2010. From the year 2010 onwards, however, participation increased continually. The research was predominantly descriptive (62.7%). Studies on fundamental questions of teaching and learning (clarification studies) were less frequent (4.0%). For the most part, quantitative methods (51.9%) were implemented in addressing subjects such as learning and teaching methods (33%), evaluation and assessment (22.4%) or curriculum development (14.4%). The study population was usually comprised of students (52.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of contributions from Austria, Germany and Switzerland peak at the beginning and at the end of the evaluated period of time. A continual increase in active participation since 2005 was not observed. These observations do not reflect the actual increase of interest in medical education research in German-speaking countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000920","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-08-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000928
Götz Fabry, Martin R Fischer
DerWissenschaftsrat, das wichtigste Beratungsgremium für die Bundesund Landesregierungen in Sachen, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Hochschulen, hat sich zum wiederholten Mal mit der ärztlichen Ausbildung befasst. Mit Manfred Prenzel ist seit Anfang 2014 ein ausgewiesener empirischer Bildungsforscher Vorsitzender des Wissenschaftsrates. In dem am 11. Juli 2014 veröffentlichten Bericht „Empfehlungen zurWeiterentwicklung des Medizinstudiums in Deutschland“ werden zum einen die Ergebnisse einer Bestandsaufnahme der humanmedizinischen Modellstudiengänge vorgestellt; zum anderen werden daraus Empfehlungen für das zukünftigeMedizinstudium insgesamt abgeleitet [1]. Die wichtigste Erkenntnis dieses Papiers ist damit schon benannt: Die „Modellstudiengangsklausel“, die 1999 insbesondere deshalb in die Approbationsordnung aufgenommen wurde, um den in den Startlöchern stehenden Reformstudiengang in Berlin zu ermöglichen, hat sich bewährt. Das Ziel dieser Klausel, „zukunftsweisende Studiengestaltungen“ zu erproben und Erfahrungen zu sammeln, in wieweit sich die dort erprobten innovativen Lehrund Lernformen auch zur Verbesserung der Regelstudiengänge nutzen lassen, wurde erreicht. Die dadurch gegebeneMöglichkeit, neue Wege des Medizinstudiums zu erproben und das enge Korsett der Approbationsordnung damit etwas zu lockern, war sicherlich einer der wichtigsten Gründe für die dynamische Entwicklung rund um das Medizinstudium in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten und hat vielfältige Veränderungen angestoßen, nicht nur in den mittlerweile neun Modellstudiengängen im engeren Sinn, sondernweit darüber hinaus. Insgesamt kommt der Wissenschaftsrat also zu einer positiven Bewertung der verschiedenen Versuche, das Medizinstudium umfassend strukturell, inhaltlich und methodisch-didaktisch neu zu organisieren. Der Bericht kann sich zwar nicht auf eine abschließende Evaluation im eigentlichen Sinn stützen, was vor allem an den bekannten methodischen Schwierigkeiten liegt, die sich beim direkten Vergleich von verschiedenen Curricula ergeben sowie im Hinblick auf die Frage, ob naheliegende Kriterien wie etwa die Leistungen in den staatlichen Prüfungen überhaupt sinnvolle und hinreichend differenzierende Outcome-Parameter sind. Trotz dieser Einschränkungen sieht der Wissenschaftsrat in Übereinstimmung mit Erkenntnissen aus der internationalen Literatur hinreichende Belege für eine positive Bewertung der in den Modellstudiengängen umgesetzten Grundprinzipien Kompetenzund Patientenorientierung, vertikale und horizontale Integration sowie im Hinblick auf die dort erprobten alternativen Lehrund Prüfungsformate, insbesondere das problemorientierte Lernen. Alle diejenigen, die die Entwicklung der letzten zwei Jahrzehnte intensiv verfolgt undmitgestaltet haben, wird der Bericht kaum überraschen, denn er führt zum einen die Linie fort, die der Wissenschaftsrat bereits mit den 1992, damals kontrovers diskutierten „Leitlinien zur Reform desMedizinstudiums“ zugrunde gelegt hat [2]. Zum
{"title":"Medical education in Germany--work in progress.","authors":"Götz Fabry, Martin R Fischer","doi":"10.3205/zma000928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000928","url":null,"abstract":"DerWissenschaftsrat, das wichtigste Beratungsgremium für die Bundesund Landesregierungen in Sachen, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Hochschulen, hat sich zum wiederholten Mal mit der ärztlichen Ausbildung befasst. Mit Manfred Prenzel ist seit Anfang 2014 ein ausgewiesener empirischer Bildungsforscher Vorsitzender des Wissenschaftsrates. In dem am 11. Juli 2014 veröffentlichten Bericht „Empfehlungen zurWeiterentwicklung des Medizinstudiums in Deutschland“ werden zum einen die Ergebnisse einer Bestandsaufnahme der humanmedizinischen Modellstudiengänge vorgestellt; zum anderen werden daraus Empfehlungen für das zukünftigeMedizinstudium insgesamt abgeleitet [1]. Die wichtigste Erkenntnis dieses Papiers ist damit schon benannt: Die „Modellstudiengangsklausel“, die 1999 insbesondere deshalb in die Approbationsordnung aufgenommen wurde, um den in den Startlöchern stehenden Reformstudiengang in Berlin zu ermöglichen, hat sich bewährt. Das Ziel dieser Klausel, „zukunftsweisende Studiengestaltungen“ zu erproben und Erfahrungen zu sammeln, in wieweit sich die dort erprobten innovativen Lehrund Lernformen auch zur Verbesserung der Regelstudiengänge nutzen lassen, wurde erreicht. Die dadurch gegebeneMöglichkeit, neue Wege des Medizinstudiums zu erproben und das enge Korsett der Approbationsordnung damit etwas zu lockern, war sicherlich einer der wichtigsten Gründe für die dynamische Entwicklung rund um das Medizinstudium in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten und hat vielfältige Veränderungen angestoßen, nicht nur in den mittlerweile neun Modellstudiengängen im engeren Sinn, sondernweit darüber hinaus. Insgesamt kommt der Wissenschaftsrat also zu einer positiven Bewertung der verschiedenen Versuche, das Medizinstudium umfassend strukturell, inhaltlich und methodisch-didaktisch neu zu organisieren. Der Bericht kann sich zwar nicht auf eine abschließende Evaluation im eigentlichen Sinn stützen, was vor allem an den bekannten methodischen Schwierigkeiten liegt, die sich beim direkten Vergleich von verschiedenen Curricula ergeben sowie im Hinblick auf die Frage, ob naheliegende Kriterien wie etwa die Leistungen in den staatlichen Prüfungen überhaupt sinnvolle und hinreichend differenzierende Outcome-Parameter sind. Trotz dieser Einschränkungen sieht der Wissenschaftsrat in Übereinstimmung mit Erkenntnissen aus der internationalen Literatur hinreichende Belege für eine positive Bewertung der in den Modellstudiengängen umgesetzten Grundprinzipien Kompetenzund Patientenorientierung, vertikale und horizontale Integration sowie im Hinblick auf die dort erprobten alternativen Lehrund Prüfungsformate, insbesondere das problemorientierte Lernen. Alle diejenigen, die die Entwicklung der letzten zwei Jahrzehnte intensiv verfolgt undmitgestaltet haben, wird der Bericht kaum überraschen, denn er führt zum einen die Linie fort, die der Wissenschaftsrat bereits mit den 1992, damals kontrovers diskutierten „Leitlinien zur Reform desMedizinstudiums“ zugrunde gelegt hat [2]. Zum","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/3c/ZMA-31-36.PMC4153000.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32674637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-05-15eCollection Date: 2014-01-01DOI: 10.3205/zma000913
Guni Kadmon, Franz Resch, Roman Duelli, Martina Kadmon
Background: The school-leaving GPA and the time since completion of secondary education are the major criteria for admission to German medical schools. However, the predictive value of the school-leaving grade and the admission delay have not been thoroughly examined since the amendment of the Medical Licensing Regulations and the introduction of reformed curricula in 2002. Detailed information on the prognosis of the different admission groups is also missing.
Aim: To examine the predictive values of the school-leaving grade and the age at enrolment for academic performance and continuity throughout the reformed medical course.
Methods: The study includes the central admission groups "GPA-best" and "delayed admission" as well as the primary and secondary local admission groups of three consecutive cohorts. The relationship between the criteria academic performance and continuity and the predictors school-leaving GPA, enrolment age, and admission group affiliation were examined up to the beginning of the final clerkship year.
Results: The academic performance and the prolongation of the pre-clinical part of undergraduate training were significantly related to the school-leaving GPA. Conversely, the dropout rate was related to age at enrolment. The students of the GPA-best group and the primary local admission group performed best and had the lowest dropout rates. The students of the delayed admission group and secondary local admission group performed significantly worse. More than 20% of these students dropped out within the pre-clinical course, half of them due to poor academic performance. However, the academic performance of all of the admission groups was highly variable and only about 35% of the students of each group reached the final clerkship year within the regular time.
Discussion: The school-leaving grade and age appear to have different prognostic implications for academic performance and continuity. Both factors have consequences for the delayed admission group. The academic prognosis of the secondary local admission group is as problematic as that of the delayed admission group. Additional admission instruments would be necessary, in order to recognise potentially able applicants independently of their school-leaving grade and to avoid the secondary admission procedure.
{"title":"Predictive value of the school-leaving grade and prognosis of different admission groups for academic performance and continuity in the medical course - a longitudinal study.","authors":"Guni Kadmon, Franz Resch, Roman Duelli, Martina Kadmon","doi":"10.3205/zma000913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The school-leaving GPA and the time since completion of secondary education are the major criteria for admission to German medical schools. However, the predictive value of the school-leaving grade and the admission delay have not been thoroughly examined since the amendment of the Medical Licensing Regulations and the introduction of reformed curricula in 2002. Detailed information on the prognosis of the different admission groups is also missing.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the predictive values of the school-leaving grade and the age at enrolment for academic performance and continuity throughout the reformed medical course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study includes the central admission groups \"GPA-best\" and \"delayed admission\" as well as the primary and secondary local admission groups of three consecutive cohorts. The relationship between the criteria academic performance and continuity and the predictors school-leaving GPA, enrolment age, and admission group affiliation were examined up to the beginning of the final clerkship year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The academic performance and the prolongation of the pre-clinical part of undergraduate training were significantly related to the school-leaving GPA. Conversely, the dropout rate was related to age at enrolment. The students of the GPA-best group and the primary local admission group performed best and had the lowest dropout rates. The students of the delayed admission group and secondary local admission group performed significantly worse. More than 20% of these students dropped out within the pre-clinical course, half of them due to poor academic performance. However, the academic performance of all of the admission groups was highly variable and only about 35% of the students of each group reached the final clerkship year within the regular time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The school-leaving grade and age appear to have different prognostic implications for academic performance and continuity. Both factors have consequences for the delayed admission group. The academic prognosis of the secondary local admission group is as problematic as that of the delayed admission group. Additional admission instruments would be necessary, in order to recognise potentially able applicants independently of their school-leaving grade and to avoid the secondary admission procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 2","pages":"Doc21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000913","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32376760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}