DNA Repair最新文献

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a hereditary disorder characterized by a deficiency in the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks and the response to replication stress. Endogenous DNA damage, most likely caused by aldehydes, severely affects hematopoietic stem cells in FA, resulting in progressive bone marrow failure and the development of leukemia. Recent studies revealed that expression levels of SLFN11 affect the replication stress response and are a strong determinant in cell killing by DNA-damaging cancer chemotherapy. Because SLFN11 is highly expressed in the hematopoietic system, we speculated that SLFN11 may have a significant role in FA pathophysiology. Indeed, we found that DNA damage sensitivity in FA cells is significantly mitigated by the loss of SLFN11 expression. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that SLFN11 destabilizes the nascent DNA strands upon replication fork stalling. In this review, we summarize our work regarding an interplay between SLFN11 and the FA pathway, and the role of SLFN11 in the response to replication stress.

DNA replication is remarkably accurate with estimates of only a handful of mutations per human genome per cell division cycle. Replication stress caused by DNA lesions, transcription-replication conflicts, and other obstacles to the replication machinery must be efficiently overcome in ways that minimize errors and maximize completion of DNA synthesis. Replication fork reversal is one mechanism that helps cells tolerate replication stress. This process involves reannealing of parental template DNA strands and generation of a nascent-nascent DNA duplex. While fork reversal may be beneficial by facilitating DNA repair or template switching, it must be confined to the appropriate contexts to preserve genome stability. Many enzymes have been implicated in this process including ATP-dependent DNA translocases like SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, HLTF, and the helicase FBH1. In addition, the RAD51 recombinase is required. Many additional factors and regulatory activities also act to ensure reversal is beneficial instead of yielding undesirable outcomes. Finally, reversed forks must also be stabilized and often need to be restarted to complete DNA synthesis. Disruption or deregulation of fork reversal causes a variety of human diseases. In this review we will describe the latest models for reversal and key mechanisms of regulation.

Enzymes of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide like (APOBEC) family are cytosine deaminases that convert cytosine to uracil in DNA and RNA. Among these proteins, APOBEC3 sub-family members, APOBEC3A (A3A) and APOBEC3B (A3B), are prominent sources of mutagenesis in cancer cells. The aberrant expression of A3A and A3B in cancer cells leads to accumulation of mutations with specific single-base substitution (SBS) signatures, characterized by C→T and C→G changes, in a number of tumor types. In addition to fueling mutagenesis, A3A and A3B, particularly A3A, induce DNA replication stress, DNA damage, and chromosomal instability through their catalytic activities, triggering a range of cellular responses. Thus, A3A/B have emerged as key drivers of genome evolution during cancer development, contributing to tumorigenesis, tumor heterogeneity, and therapeutic resistance. Yet, the expression of A3A/B in cancer cells presents a cancer vulnerability that can be exploited therapeutically. In this review, we discuss the recent studies that shed light on the mechanisms regulating A3A expression and the impact of A3A in cancer. We also review recent advances in the development of A3A inhibitors and provide perspectives on the future directions of A3A research.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor associated with poor patient survival. The current standard treatment involves invasive surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy employing temozolomide (TMZ). Resistance to TMZ is, however, a major challenge. Previous work from our group has identified candidate genes linked to TMZ resistance, including genes encoding translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases iota (Polɩ) and kappa (Polκ). These specialized enzymes are known for bypassing lesions and tolerating DNA damage. Here, we investigated the roles of Polɩ and Polκ in TMZ resistance, employing MGMT-deficient U251-MG glioblastoma cells, with knockout of either POLI or POLK genes encoding Polɩ and Polκ, respectively, and assess their viability and genotoxic stress responses upon subsequent TMZ treatment. Cells lacking either of these polymerases exhibited a significant decrease in viability following TMZ treatment compared to parental counterparts. The restoration of the missing polymerase led to a recovery of cell viability. Furthermore, knockout cells displayed increased cell cycle arrest, mainly in late S-phase, and lower levels of genotoxic stress after TMZ treatment, as assessed by a reduction of γH2AX foci and flow cytometry data. This implies that TMZ treatment does not trigger a significant H2AX phosphorylation response in the absence of these proteins. Interestingly, combining TMZ with Mirin (double-strand break repair pathway inhibitor) further reduced the cell viability and increased DNA damage and γH2AX positive cells in TLS KO cells, but not in parental cells. These findings underscore the crucial roles of Polɩ and Polκ in conferring TMZ resistance and the potential backup role of homologous recombination in the absence of these TLS polymerases. Targeting these TLS enzymes, along with double-strand break DNA repair inhibition, could, therefore, provide a promising strategy to enhance TMZ's effectiveness in treating GBM.

While that ROS causes DNA damage is well documented, there has been limited investigation into whether DNA damages and their repair processes can conversely induce oxidative stress. By generating a site-specific DNA double strand break (DSB) via I-SceI endonuclease expression in S. cerevisiae without damaging other cellular components, this study demonstrated that DNA repair does trigger oxidative stress. Deleting genes participating in the initiation of the resection step of homologous recombination (HR), like the MRX complex, resulted in stimulation of ROS. In contrast, deleting genes acting downstream of HR resection suppressed ROS levels. Additionally, blocking non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) also suppressed ROS. Further analysis identified Rad53 as a key player that relays DNA damage signals to alter redox metabolism in an HR-specific manner. These results suggest both HR and NHEJ can drive metabolism changes and oxidative stress, with NHEJ playing a more prominent role in ROS stimulation. Further analysis revealed a correlation between DSB-induced ROS increase and enhanced activity of NADPH oxidase Yno1 and various antioxidant enzymes. Deleting the antioxidant gene SOD1 induced synthetic lethality in HR-deficient mutants like mre11Δ and rad51Δ upon DSB induction. These findings uncover a significant interplay between DNA repair mechanisms and cellular metabolism, providing insights into understanding the side effects of genotoxic therapies and potentially aiding development of more effective cancer treatment strategies.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) clears genomes of DNA adducts formed by UV light, environmental agents, and antitumor drugs. Gene mutations that lead to defects in the core NER reaction cause the skin cancer-prone disease xeroderma pigmentosum. In NER, DNA lesions are excised within an oligonucleotide of 25–30 residues via a complex, multi-step reaction that is regulated by protein-protein interactions. These interactions were first characterized in the 1990s using pull-down, co-IP and yeast two-hybrid assays. More recently, high-resolution structures and detailed functional studies have started to yield detailed pictures of the progression along the NER reaction coordinate. In this review, we highlight how the study of interactions among proteins by structural and/or functional studies have provided insights into the mechanisms by which the NER machinery recognizes and excises DNA lesions. Furthermore, we identify reported, but poorly characterized or unsubstantiated interactions in need of further validation.

Given its central role in life, DNA is remarkably easy to damage. Double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most toxic form of DNA damage, and DSBs pose the greatest danger to genomic integrity. In higher vertebrates, the non-homologous end joining pathway (NHEJ) is the predominate pathway that repairs DSBs. NHEJ has three steps: 1) DNA end recognition by the DNA dependent protein kinase [DNA-PK], 2) DNA end-processing by numerous NHEJ accessory factors, and 3) DNA end ligation by the DNA ligase IV complex (LX4). Although this would appear to be a relatively simple mechanism, it has become increasingly apparent that it is not.

Recently, much insight has been derived regarding the mechanism of non-homologous end joining through a proliferation of cryo-EM studies, structure-function mutational experiments informed by these new structural data, and novel single-molecule imaging approaches. An emerging consensus in the field is that NHEJ progresses from initial DSB end recognition by DNA-PK to synapsis of the two DNA ends in a long-range synaptic complex where ends are held too far apart (115 Å) for ligation, and then progress to a short-range synaptic complex where ends are positioned close enough for ligation. What was surprising from these structural studies was the observation of two distinct types of DNA-PK dimers that represent NHEJ long-range complexes. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about the function of the distinct NHEJ synaptic complexes and align this new information with emerging cellular single-molecule microscopy studies as well as with previous studies of DNA-PK’s function in repair.

The Mediator complex is an essential coregulator of RNA polymerase II transcription. More recent developments suggest Mediator functions as a link between transcription regulation, genome organisation and DNA repair mechanisms including nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, and homologous recombination. Dysfunctions of these processes are frequently associated with human pathologies, and growing evidence shows Mediator involvement in cancers, neurological, metabolic and infectious diseases. The detailed deciphering of molecular mechanisms of Mediator functions, using interdisciplinary approaches in different biological models and considering all functions of this complex, will contribute to our understanding of relevant human diseases.

Cellular and molecular responses to DNA damage are highly orchestrated and dynamic, acting to preserve the maintenance and integrity of the genome. Histone proteins bind DNA and organize the genome into chromatin. Post-translational modifications of histones have been shown to play an essential role in orchestrating the chromatin response to DNA damage by regulating the DNA damage response pathway. Among the histone modifications that contribute to this intricate network, histone ADP-ribosylation (ADPr) is emerging as a pivotal component of chromatin-based DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. In this review, we survey how histone ADPr is regulated to promote the DDR and how it impacts chromatin and other histone marks. Recent advancements have revealed histone ADPr effects on chromatin structure and the regulation of DNA repair factor recruitment to DNA lesions. Additionally, we highlight advancements in technology that have enabled the identification and functional validation of histone ADPr in cells and in response to DNA damage. Given the involvement of DNA damage and epigenetic regulation in human diseases including cancer, these findings have clinical implications for histone ADPr, which are also discussed. Overall, this review covers the involvement of histone ADPr in the DDR and highlights potential future investigations aimed at identifying mechanisms governed by histone ADPr that participate in the DDR, human diseases, and their treatments.

Eukaryotic DNA replication is a tightly controlled process that occurs in two main steps, i.e., licensing and firing, which take place in the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle, respectively. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the budding yeast, replication origins contain consensus sequences that are recognized and bound by the licensing factor Orc1–6, which then recruits the replicative Mcm2–7 helicase. By contrast, mammalian initiation sites lack such consensus sequences, and the mammalian ORC does not exhibit sequence specificity. Studies performed over the past decades have identified replication initiation sites in the mammalian genome using sequencing-based assays, raising the question of whether replication initiation occurs at confined sites or in broad zones across the genome. Although recent reports have shown that the licensed MCMs in mammalian cells are broadly distributed, suggesting that ORC-dependent licensing may not determine the initiation sites/zones, they are predominantly located upstream of actively transcribed genes. This review compares the mechanism of replication initiation in yeast and mammalian cells, summarizes the sequencing-based technologies used for the identification of initiation sites/zones, and proposes a possible mechanism of initiation-site/zone selection in mammalian cells. Future directions and challenges in this field are also discussed.