{"title":"L’image disqualifiante de la « violence populaire » en démocratie","authors":"Jérémie Moualek","doi":"10.4000/socio.12204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.12204","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45693143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pour une histoire du sensible","authors":"Quentin Deluermoz, Hervé Mazurel","doi":"10.4000/socio.12394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.12394","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46002059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Buffet à vif à Sarajevo","authors":"Pierre Meunier","doi":"10.4000/socio.12414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.12414","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45863850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A critical review of Immanuel Wallerstein’s Modern World-System is far more than just an obligation sociologists and historians owe to one of the most influential social scientists of the last fifty years. Rather a reconsideration is both timely and urgent for two reasons: On the one hand, the theme he dealt with most intensively—early modern capitalism—is more topical than ever in the early twenty-first century because with the demise of industrial capitalism structural similarities between early modern forms of mercantile capitalism like the putting-out system and today’s attempts of platform or digital capitalism to monopolize market access become more and more obvious. And on the other hand, Wallerstein’s dominant concern with the asymmetrical power relations between center, semiperipheries and peripheries can still serve as a powerful reminder to seriously engage the global dimension of capitalist development today. This article although written from the perspective of a historian will try to do justice to Wallerstein’s theoretical ambitions as well will be extremely simple. It will be shown that although some critical points were well taken Wallerstein’s general approach to early modern capitalism is by no means completely outdated and superseded. Even if some of the answers he gave may seem indefensible today, there can be no doubt that he asked crucially important questions which still are in need of answers today.
{"title":"Wallerstein on early modern capitalism and global inequality: a reevaluation","authors":"Friedrich Lenger","doi":"10.4000/SOCIO.10939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/SOCIO.10939","url":null,"abstract":"A critical review of Immanuel Wallerstein’s Modern World-System is far more than just an obligation sociologists and historians owe to one of the most influential social scientists of the last fifty years. Rather a reconsideration is both timely and urgent for two reasons: On the one hand, the theme he dealt with most intensively—early modern capitalism—is more topical than ever in the early twenty-first century because with the demise of industrial capitalism structural similarities between early modern forms of mercantile capitalism like the putting-out system and today’s attempts of platform or digital capitalism to monopolize market access become more and more obvious. And on the other hand, Wallerstein’s dominant concern with the asymmetrical power relations between center, semiperipheries and peripheries can still serve as a powerful reminder to seriously engage the global dimension of capitalist development today. This article although written from the perspective of a historian will try to do justice to Wallerstein’s theoretical ambitions as well will be extremely simple. It will be shown that although some critical points were well taken Wallerstein’s general approach to early modern capitalism is by no means completely outdated and superseded. Even if some of the answers he gave may seem indefensible today, there can be no doubt that he asked crucially important questions which still are in need of answers today.","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":"1 1","pages":"49-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41989372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Un Américain à Paris","authors":"M. Aymard","doi":"10.4000/SOCIO.11184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/SOCIO.11184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42877785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
La question ethique du « triage » des malades, en situation de penurie, quand il s’agit de choisir lequel pourra acceder a un lit de reanimation et lequel sera prive d’acces, comporte des dimensions qui ne sont pas toutes ou pas exclusivement ethiques. Elle s’inscrit au carrefour de preoccupations qui touchent aussi a la justice, a la politique, a l’economie, et peut etre lourde d’enjeux sociaux, en l’occurrence generationnels. Elle est aussi susceptible d’alimenter de facon quelque peu forcee des debats mediatiques qui, dans certains cas, peuvent tourner a la panique morale.
{"title":"Tout n’est pas éthique dans l’éthique","authors":"M. Wieviorka","doi":"10.4000/SOCIO.11389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/SOCIO.11389","url":null,"abstract":"La question ethique du « triage » des malades, en situation de penurie, quand il s’agit de choisir lequel pourra acceder a un lit de reanimation et lequel sera prive d’acces, comporte des dimensions qui ne sont pas toutes ou pas exclusivement ethiques. Elle s’inscrit au carrefour de preoccupations qui touchent aussi a la justice, a la politique, a l’economie, et peut etre lourde d’enjeux sociaux, en l’occurrence generationnels. Elle est aussi susceptible d’alimenter de facon quelque peu forcee des debats mediatiques qui, dans certains cas, peuvent tourner a la panique morale.","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":"1 1","pages":"225-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44338040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Le nom d’Immanuel Wallerstein est associe a l’elaboration d’une nouvelle maniere de pratiquer la science sociale, l’analyse des systemes-monde, qui precede de pres de vingt ans l’essor des global studies. Cependant, les elements constituant le soubassement theorique du Modern World-System sont le fruit d’une lente elaboration au cours des annees 1960. C’est ce cheminement que retrace cet article en s’appuyant aussi bien sur les textes publies que sur les inedits verses dans les « Immanuel Wallerstein Papers » de Binghamton, de cette periode charniere (1964-1970). Partant d’une perspective comparatiste a visee nomothetique portant sur la modernisation des societes nationales, Immanuel Wallerstein s’en est peu a peu detache au profit de l’ecriture de l’histoire d’un systeme capitaliste global. Dans cette evolution, la lecture de Fernand Braudel et les contacts avec la Maison des sciences de l’homme ont ete determinants.
{"title":"De l’étude comparée des sociétés nationales au Modern World-System","authors":"Yves-David Hugot","doi":"10.4000/SOCIO.10894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/SOCIO.10894","url":null,"abstract":"Le nom d’Immanuel Wallerstein est associe a l’elaboration d’une nouvelle maniere de pratiquer la science sociale, l’analyse des systemes-monde, qui precede de pres de vingt ans l’essor des global studies. Cependant, les elements constituant le soubassement theorique du Modern World-System sont le fruit d’une lente elaboration au cours des annees 1960. C’est ce cheminement que retrace cet article en s’appuyant aussi bien sur les textes publies que sur les inedits verses dans les « Immanuel Wallerstein Papers » de Binghamton, de cette periode charniere (1964-1970). Partant d’une perspective comparatiste a visee nomothetique portant sur la modernisation des societes nationales, Immanuel Wallerstein s’en est peu a peu detache au profit de l’ecriture de l’histoire d’un systeme capitaliste global. Dans cette evolution, la lecture de Fernand Braudel et les contacts avec la Maison des sciences de l’homme ont ete determinants.","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":"1 1","pages":"21-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41476890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article argues that Immanuel Wallerstein’s world-system approach was instrumental in revealing sociology’s theoretical and methodological blind spots and in formulating a comprehensive framework for the study of global inequalities. In doing so, it anticipated both the critique of Eurocentrism and methodological nationalism put forth by transnational and postcolonial approaches as well as the debates over the rise in global inequalities by several decades. I trace this analytical primacy to several factors: first, to world-systems analysis’ methodological shift from the nation-state to the entire capitalist world-economy as an early global sociology; second, to the relation between the methodological shift to the epistemological critique and their role in Wallerstein’s early approach to global inequalities. Finally, I address the relationship between the self-definition of world-systems analysis as a form of protest against mainstream social science (rather than as a theory) and the theoretical and political filiations with postcolonial and decolonial approaches in order to show how they contributed together to the prominence of global inequalities as a topic.
{"title":"Global inequalities avant la lettre: Immanuel Wallerstein’s contribution","authors":"Manuela Boatcă","doi":"10.4000/SOCIO.10999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/SOCIO.10999","url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that Immanuel Wallerstein’s world-system approach was instrumental in revealing sociology’s theoretical and methodological blind spots and in formulating a comprehensive framework for the study of global inequalities. In doing so, it anticipated both the critique of Eurocentrism and methodological nationalism put forth by transnational and postcolonial approaches as well as the debates over the rise in global inequalities by several decades. I trace this analytical primacy to several factors: first, to world-systems analysis’ methodological shift from the nation-state to the entire capitalist world-economy as an early global sociology; second, to the relation between the methodological shift to the epistemological critique and their role in Wallerstein’s early approach to global inequalities. Finally, I address the relationship between the self-definition of world-systems analysis as a form of protest against mainstream social science (rather than as a theory) and the theoretical and political filiations with postcolonial and decolonial approaches in order to show how they contributed together to the prominence of global inequalities as a topic.","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":"1 1","pages":"71-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45963791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Du 1er octobre 1998 au 1er juillet 2019, Immanuel Wallerstein s’est livre deux fois par mois a un commentaire de l’actualite geopolitique mondiale, nous laissant ainsi 500 commentaires etales sur plus de vingt ans. Le terme geopolitique ne doit cependant pas induire en erreur. Si l’on trouve des « commentaires » susceptibles d’etre qualifies de « geopolitiques » en un sens etroit (« Le retour de l’axe Paris-Berlin-Moscou », no 317, 2011), nombre d’entre eux ne constituent pas des analyses sta...
{"title":"Immanuel Wallerstein analyste de l’actualité mondiale","authors":"Immanuel Wallerstein","doi":"10.4000/SOCIO.11309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4000/SOCIO.11309","url":null,"abstract":"Du 1er octobre 1998 au 1er juillet 2019, Immanuel Wallerstein s’est livre deux fois par mois a un commentaire de l’actualite geopolitique mondiale, nous laissant ainsi 500 commentaires etales sur plus de vingt ans. Le terme geopolitique ne doit cependant pas induire en erreur. Si l’on trouve des « commentaires » susceptibles d’etre qualifies de « geopolitiques » en un sens etroit (« Le retour de l’axe Paris-Berlin-Moscou », no 317, 2011), nombre d’entre eux ne constituent pas des analyses sta...","PeriodicalId":31312,"journal":{"name":"Socio","volume":"1 1","pages":"151-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42737926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}