首页 > 最新文献

Reproductive Health Matters最新文献

英文 中文
The state of human rights in relation to key populations, HIV and sexual and reproductive health 与重点人群、艾滋病毒、性健康和生殖健康有关的人权状况
Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1543992
O. K. Dingake
This year marks the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the bold acknowledgement by all the nations of the world that “the recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. As we celebrate the UDHR anniversary, we also need to take stock to reflect on humanity’s journey on this incredible path of realising human rights for all. In doing so, we must acknowledge that whilst the rhetoric has been on the inalienable rights of all members of the human family, the reality on the ground has been different, often characterised by the violation of rights of sexual minorities and other marginalised groups. Increasingly, humanity accepts the proposition that a fair, prosperous, secure and sustainable future is not possible if the rights of every person are not recognised in practice and in law. Perhaps no other public health epidemic has tried this assertion as well as the proclamation of “the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family” by the UDHR, as has HIV. HIV is not just a public health matter, it is also a human rights and social justice challenge perpetuated by stigma and discrimination and the failure to guarantee the rights of thosemost at risk of the disease. As a result, HIV continues to be a major global public health concern, having claimed more than 35 million lives so far. In 2017, 940,000 people died from HIV-related causes globally. Globally, there were approximately 36.9 million people living with HIV at the end of 2017, including 1.8 million people who became newly infected in 2017. Key populations are groups who are at increased risk of HIV infection, irrespective of epidemic type or local context. According to UNAIDS, key populations include gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, people in prisons and other closed settings, sex workers and their clients, and transgender people. They often have legal and social issues related to their behaviours that increase their vulnerability to HIV and reduce access to testing and treatment programmes. These behaviours are often criminalised, making it difficult for people to freely access health services for fear of arrests. Young people, due to specific higher risk behaviours, such as inconsistent use of condoms, are often regarded as part of key or vulnerable populations. What these populations have in common is that in many jurisdictions, they are marginalised, criminalised or in conflict with the criminal justice system, and subject to serious violations of the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – equality, dignity, non-discrimination, life, liberty, security of the persons, effective remedy, fair trial, freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment, arbitrary arrest and detention, freedom of movement, expression, assembly
今年是《世界人权宣言》发表70周年,世界各国大胆承认“承认人类大家庭所有成员的固有尊严以及平等和不可剥夺的权利是世界自由、正义与和平的基础”。在庆祝《世界人权宣言》周年之际,我们也需要回顾和反思人类在实现人人享有人权这条不可思议的道路上走过的历程。在这样做的过程中,我们必须承认,虽然口头上一直是关于人类大家庭所有成员不可剥夺的权利,但实际情况却有所不同,其特点往往是性少数群体和其他边缘化群体的权利受到侵犯。人类越来越接受这样一种观点:如果每个人的权利在实践和法律上得不到承认,就不可能有一个公平、繁荣、安全和可持续的未来。也许没有其他公共卫生流行病像艾滋病毒一样尝试过这种主张,也没有像《世界人权宣言》那样宣布“人类大家庭所有成员享有平等和不可剥夺的权利”。艾滋病毒不仅是一个公共卫生问题,也是一项人权和社会正义挑战,耻辱和歧视以及未能保障最有可能感染这种疾病的人的权利,使其长期存在。因此,艾滋病毒仍然是一个主要的全球公共卫生问题,迄今已夺去3 500多万人的生命。2017年,全球有94万人死于与艾滋病毒相关的原因。截至2017年底,全球约有3690万人感染艾滋病毒,其中180万人是在2017年新感染的。关键人群是艾滋病毒感染风险增加的群体,无论其流行类型或当地情况如何。据联合国艾滋病规划署称,重点人群包括同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者、注射吸毒者、监狱和其他封闭环境中的人、性工作者及其客户以及变性人。她们的行为往往涉及法律和社会问题,这些问题增加了她们感染艾滋病毒的脆弱性,并减少了获得检测和治疗方案的机会。这些行为往往被定为犯罪,使人们因害怕被捕而难以自由获得保健服务。年轻人由于有特定的高风险行为,如不一致使用避孕套,往往被视为关键或弱势群体的一部分。这些人口的共同之处在于,在许多司法管辖区,他们被边缘化、被定罪或与刑事司法制度发生冲突,并受到《世界人权宣言》所载权利的严重侵犯,这些权利包括平等、尊严、不歧视、生命、自由、人身安全、有效补救、公平审判、免于酷刑、残忍、不人道和有辱人格的待遇和处罚、任意逮捕和拘留、行动自由、表达、集合、联想等等。关键人群之所以“关键”是有原因的。男男性行为者、性工作者、跨性别者和注射吸毒者不仅面临的艾滋病毒风险是一般人群的14-50倍,而且往往面临两倍、三倍或四倍的复合污名和歧视,这严重影响了他们获得艾滋病毒预防和治疗资源的能力。这种情况主要是由歧视性和惩罚性的法律和政策框架造成的,这些框架破坏了有效的艾滋病毒应对措施
{"title":"The state of human rights in relation to key populations, HIV and sexual and reproductive health","authors":"O. K. Dingake","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1543992","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1543992","url":null,"abstract":"This year marks the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the bold acknowledgement by all the nations of the world that “the recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. As we celebrate the UDHR anniversary, we also need to take stock to reflect on humanity’s journey on this incredible path of realising human rights for all. In doing so, we must acknowledge that whilst the rhetoric has been on the inalienable rights of all members of the human family, the reality on the ground has been different, often characterised by the violation of rights of sexual minorities and other marginalised groups. Increasingly, humanity accepts the proposition that a fair, prosperous, secure and sustainable future is not possible if the rights of every person are not recognised in practice and in law. Perhaps no other public health epidemic has tried this assertion as well as the proclamation of “the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family” by the UDHR, as has HIV. HIV is not just a public health matter, it is also a human rights and social justice challenge perpetuated by stigma and discrimination and the failure to guarantee the rights of thosemost at risk of the disease. As a result, HIV continues to be a major global public health concern, having claimed more than 35 million lives so far. In 2017, 940,000 people died from HIV-related causes globally. Globally, there were approximately 36.9 million people living with HIV at the end of 2017, including 1.8 million people who became newly infected in 2017. Key populations are groups who are at increased risk of HIV infection, irrespective of epidemic type or local context. According to UNAIDS, key populations include gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, people in prisons and other closed settings, sex workers and their clients, and transgender people. They often have legal and social issues related to their behaviours that increase their vulnerability to HIV and reduce access to testing and treatment programmes. These behaviours are often criminalised, making it difficult for people to freely access health services for fear of arrests. Young people, due to specific higher risk behaviours, such as inconsistent use of condoms, are often regarded as part of key or vulnerable populations. What these populations have in common is that in many jurisdictions, they are marginalised, criminalised or in conflict with the criminal justice system, and subject to serious violations of the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – equality, dignity, non-discrimination, life, liberty, security of the persons, effective remedy, fair trial, freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment, arbitrary arrest and detention, freedom of movement, expression, assembly ","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 1","pages":"46 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1543992","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45347666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Securing the right to safe and legal abortion: perspectives from the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission 保障安全合法堕胎权:古特马赫柳叶刀委员会的观点
Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1542915
S. Sadinsky, Susheela Singh, Cynthia Summers
In March 2018, the Democratic Republic of Congo moved to enact the Maputo Protocol, under which signatory states agree to authorise legal access to abortion in a range of circumstances. Two months later, voters in Ireland delivered a decisive victory for reproductive rights, choosing overwhelmingly to repeal the country’s near-total ban on abortion. The following month, Argentina’s lower house of Congress voted in favour of a draft bill that would permit abortion up to 14 weeks; although the upper house narrowly rejected the legislation, this was the closest the country ever came to legalising abortion. While progress remains uneven, these developments speak to a shifting consensus on abortion rights around the world and unfold alongside mounting efforts of advocates to position safe and legal abortion as a human right. The seeds of this shift were planted in Cairo in 1994. Until the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) that year, there had not been a global agreement that created common language on sexual and reproductive health, or on the rights people have when it comes to making reproductive decisions. The Programme of Action that emerged from ICPD mapped out the linkages between social and economic growth, sustainable development, and individual and collective wellbeing. It also identified key components of sexual and reproductive health care, which included the provision of safe abortion services in settings where such care is not against the law. Since 1994, more than 30 countries, many in the developing world, have amended their laws to expand access to safe and legal abortion. Nonetheless, abortion is often viewed as a separate domain entirely, rather than as a core component of sexual and reproductive health care. This lack of integration makes it much easier to neglect, and in some cases exclude, abortion care in both programming and policy-making. In recognition of the value of taking a more holistic approach to sexual and reproductive health and rights, the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights convened in 2016. Composed of 16 experts with multidisciplinary experience from Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and North and South America, the Commission set out to gather the most current evidence on sexual and reproductive health and rights at the global level, with the aim of driving transformational change, through an evidence-based agenda, focused on policy and political action. Its resulting report, released inMay 2018, reveals enormous gaps in sexual and reproductive health and rights worldwide, and quantifies the toll those gaps take on individuals, countries and regions as a whole. The Commission’s report presents a new, comprehensive definition of sexual and reproductive health and rights, which integrates the full range of people’s sexual and reproductive health needs. Drawing on international and regional agreements of the past 25 years, this new definition highl
2018年3月,刚果民主共和国采取行动颁布了《马普托议定书》,根据该议定书,签署国同意授权在一系列情况下合法堕胎。两个月后,爱尔兰选民在生育权利方面取得了决定性的胜利,以压倒性多数选择废除该国几乎完全禁止堕胎的规定。接下来的一个月,阿根廷国会下议院投票赞成一项允许堕胎至14周的法案草案;尽管上议院以微弱优势否决了这项立法,但这是该国最接近堕胎合法化的一次。虽然进展仍然不平衡,但这些事态发展表明,世界各地对堕胎权利的共识正在发生变化,并与倡导者越来越多地努力将安全和合法的堕胎定位为一项人权。这种转变的种子于1994年在开罗播下。直到那一年国际人口与发展会议(人发会议)召开之前,还没有达成一项全球协议,就性健康和生殖健康或人们在作出生殖决定时享有的权利制定共同语言。人发会议产生的《行动纲领》阐明了社会和经济增长、可持续发展、个人和集体福利之间的联系。它还确定了性保健和生殖保健的关键组成部分,其中包括在不违反法律的情况下提供安全堕胎服务。自1994年以来,30多个国家,其中许多是发展中国家,修改了法律,扩大了获得安全合法堕胎的机会。然而,堕胎往往被视为一个完全独立的领域,而不是性健康和生殖健康保健的核心组成部分。由于缺乏整合,在规划和决策中更容易忽视,在某些情况下排除堕胎护理。认识到对性健康和生殖健康及权利采取更全面办法的价值,古特马赫-柳叶刀性健康和生殖健康及权利委员会于2016年召开会议。委员会由来自非洲、亚洲、欧洲、中东以及北美和南美的16名具有多学科经验的专家组成,着手在全球一级收集有关性健康和生殖健康及权利的最新证据,目的是通过以证据为基础的议程,重点关注政策和政治行动,推动转型变革。其结果报告于2018年5月发布,揭示了全世界在性健康和生殖健康及权利方面的巨大差距,并量化了这些差距对个人、国家和整个区域造成的损失。委员会的报告提出了关于性健康和生殖健康及权利的新的全面定义,其中纳入了人们性健康和生殖健康的全部需求。根据过去25年的国际和区域协议,这一新的定义强调了一个事实,即成就
{"title":"Securing the right to safe and legal abortion: perspectives from the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission","authors":"S. Sadinsky, Susheela Singh, Cynthia Summers","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1542915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542915","url":null,"abstract":"In March 2018, the Democratic Republic of Congo moved to enact the Maputo Protocol, under which signatory states agree to authorise legal access to abortion in a range of circumstances. Two months later, voters in Ireland delivered a decisive victory for reproductive rights, choosing overwhelmingly to repeal the country’s near-total ban on abortion. The following month, Argentina’s lower house of Congress voted in favour of a draft bill that would permit abortion up to 14 weeks; although the upper house narrowly rejected the legislation, this was the closest the country ever came to legalising abortion. While progress remains uneven, these developments speak to a shifting consensus on abortion rights around the world and unfold alongside mounting efforts of advocates to position safe and legal abortion as a human right. The seeds of this shift were planted in Cairo in 1994. Until the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) that year, there had not been a global agreement that created common language on sexual and reproductive health, or on the rights people have when it comes to making reproductive decisions. The Programme of Action that emerged from ICPD mapped out the linkages between social and economic growth, sustainable development, and individual and collective wellbeing. It also identified key components of sexual and reproductive health care, which included the provision of safe abortion services in settings where such care is not against the law. Since 1994, more than 30 countries, many in the developing world, have amended their laws to expand access to safe and legal abortion. Nonetheless, abortion is often viewed as a separate domain entirely, rather than as a core component of sexual and reproductive health care. This lack of integration makes it much easier to neglect, and in some cases exclude, abortion care in both programming and policy-making. In recognition of the value of taking a more holistic approach to sexual and reproductive health and rights, the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights convened in 2016. Composed of 16 experts with multidisciplinary experience from Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and North and South America, the Commission set out to gather the most current evidence on sexual and reproductive health and rights at the global level, with the aim of driving transformational change, through an evidence-based agenda, focused on policy and political action. Its resulting report, released inMay 2018, reveals enormous gaps in sexual and reproductive health and rights worldwide, and quantifies the toll those gaps take on individuals, countries and regions as a whole. The Commission’s report presents a new, comprehensive definition of sexual and reproductive health and rights, which integrates the full range of people’s sexual and reproductive health needs. Drawing on international and regional agreements of the past 25 years, this new definition highl","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 1","pages":"54 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1542915","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44677057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Celebrating the 70th anniversary of the UDHR, celebrating sexual and reproductive rights 庆祝《世界人权宣言》70周年,庆祝性权利和生殖权利
Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1550239
Eszter Kismödi, L. Ferguson
Sexual and reproductive rights are human rights. In 1948, when States proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations, they recognised “the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family”, civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights. Most relevant to sexual and reproductive health (SRH), the UDHR recognised the right to non-discrimination, the right to life, liberty and security of person, the right to social security, the right to a standard of living adequate for health and wellbeing, and that “motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance”. The UDHR did not go into details about the areas of life to which these rights are particularly applicable, but reaffirmed the dignity and worth of the human person, the equal rights of women and men and the determination to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom. Human rights related to sexuality, gender, gender diversity and SRH have been recognised in the treaties which were generated from the UDHR, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. These have been expanded upon by the Treaty Monitoring Bodies’ General Recommendations and Comments, which constitute official interpretations of the treaties. The Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, for example, adopted a specific General Comment on the Right to Sexual and Reproductive Health, and the Committee on the Rights of the Child’s General Comment on the implementation of the rights of the child during adolescence specifically recognises that “there should be no barriers to commodities, information and counselling on sexual and reproductive health and rights, such as requirements for third-party consent or authorization”. The Human Rights Committee’s latest General Comment provides the international community a much-needed framework to hold governments accountable for the high rates of death and injury which occur when women are forced to seek unsafe abortions, and calls for the provision of comprehensive reproductive health services. Sexual and reproductive rights have received extensive legal recognition at regional and national levels as well over the past decades. The European Court of Human Rights, for example, recognised the right to sexuality education as early as 1976, and most recently issued a similar decision in connection with Switzerland’s legal obligation to provide sexuality education to children, as a clear recognition of the role that sexuality education plays in the global education of children, in the fight against sexual abuse and in the protection of public health. At the national level, there is a major evolution of law reform in relation to decriminalising same-sex sexual conduct, and recognising equal rights regardless of sexual orientation and for same-sex couples, as
性权利和生殖权利是人权。1948年,当各国宣布《世界人权宣言》为各国人民和所有国家的共同成就标准时,它们承认“人类大家庭所有成员的平等和不可剥夺的权利”,即公民、政治、经济、社会和文化权利。与性健康和生殖健康最相关的是,《世界人权宣言》承认不歧视权、生命权、人身自由和安全权、社会保障权、享有健康和福祉所需生活水平的权利,以及“母亲和儿童有权获得特别照顾和援助”。《世界人权宣言》没有详细说明这些权利特别适用的生活领域,但重申了人的尊严和价值、男女平等权利以及在更大的自由中促进社会进步和提高生活水平的决心。《世界人权宣言》产生的条约,如《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》和《儿童权利公约》,都承认了与性、性别、性别多样性和性健康和生殖健康有关的人权。条约监督机构的一般性建议和意见对这些建议和意见作了扩展,它们构成了对条约的正式解释。例如,经济、社会和文化权利委员会通过了一项关于性健康和生殖健康权的具体一般性意见,儿童权利委员会关于在青春期落实儿童权利的一般性意见明确承认,“在性健康和生殖健康及权利方面的商品、信息和咨询不应存在任何障碍,例如要求第三方同意或授权”。人权事务委员会最新的一般性意见为国际社会提供了一个急需的框架,让各国政府对妇女被迫寻求不安全堕胎时的高死亡率和高伤害率负责,并呼吁提供全面的生殖健康服务。在过去几十年中,性权利和生殖权利也在区域和国家层面得到了广泛的法律承认。例如,欧洲人权法院早在1976年就承认了性教育的权利,最近还就瑞士向儿童提供性教育的法律义务发布了一项类似的裁决,明确承认性教育在全球儿童教育中的作用,打击性虐待和保护公众健康。在国家一级,法律改革发生了重大变化,将同性性行为非刑事化,承认不分性取向和同性伴侣的平等权利,以及制定法律和通过最高法院的裁决,承认性别多样性是禁止歧视的理由,并给予跨性别者法律上的性别承认。区域、国家和次国家各级的政策和战略文件本质上不具有法律约束力;然而,它们可以成为性权利和生殖权利的应用和实施的重要指南。例如,《马普托行动计划》提供了一项政策编辑
{"title":"Celebrating the 70th anniversary of the UDHR, celebrating sexual and reproductive rights","authors":"Eszter Kismödi, L. Ferguson","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1550239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1550239","url":null,"abstract":"Sexual and reproductive rights are human rights. In 1948, when States proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations, they recognised “the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family”, civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights. Most relevant to sexual and reproductive health (SRH), the UDHR recognised the right to non-discrimination, the right to life, liberty and security of person, the right to social security, the right to a standard of living adequate for health and wellbeing, and that “motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance”. The UDHR did not go into details about the areas of life to which these rights are particularly applicable, but reaffirmed the dignity and worth of the human person, the equal rights of women and men and the determination to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom. Human rights related to sexuality, gender, gender diversity and SRH have been recognised in the treaties which were generated from the UDHR, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. These have been expanded upon by the Treaty Monitoring Bodies’ General Recommendations and Comments, which constitute official interpretations of the treaties. The Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, for example, adopted a specific General Comment on the Right to Sexual and Reproductive Health, and the Committee on the Rights of the Child’s General Comment on the implementation of the rights of the child during adolescence specifically recognises that “there should be no barriers to commodities, information and counselling on sexual and reproductive health and rights, such as requirements for third-party consent or authorization”. The Human Rights Committee’s latest General Comment provides the international community a much-needed framework to hold governments accountable for the high rates of death and injury which occur when women are forced to seek unsafe abortions, and calls for the provision of comprehensive reproductive health services. Sexual and reproductive rights have received extensive legal recognition at regional and national levels as well over the past decades. The European Court of Human Rights, for example, recognised the right to sexuality education as early as 1976, and most recently issued a similar decision in connection with Switzerland’s legal obligation to provide sexuality education to children, as a clear recognition of the role that sexuality education plays in the global education of children, in the fight against sexual abuse and in the protection of public health. At the national level, there is a major evolution of law reform in relation to decriminalising same-sex sexual conduct, and recognising equal rights regardless of sexual orientation and for same-sex couples, as ","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1550239","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41666643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Litigating to ensure access to quality maternal health care for women and girls in Kenya. 通过诉讼确保肯尼亚妇女和女孩获得高质量的孕产妇保健服务。
Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-28 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1508172
Beatrice Odallo, Evelyne Opondo, Martin Onyango

Access to comprehensive reproductive health care for women and girls, including access to quality maternal health services remains a challenge in Kenya. A recent government enquiry assessing close to 500 maternal deaths that occurred in 2014 revealed gaps in the quality of maternal care, concluding that more than 90% of the women who had died had received "suboptimal" maternal care. In Kenya, the Center for Reproductive Rights (the Center) has undertaken public interest litigation among other strategies to challenge human rights violations and systematic failures within the health sector. In 2014, before the High Court of Bungoma in Western Kenya, the Center filed a case on behalf of Josephine Majani who had been neglected and abused by the staff of the Bungoma County Referral Hospital, a public health facility where she had gone to deliver in 2013. This commentary addresses the situation of maternal health care in Kenya and the actions leading to litigation that was specifically aimed at enabling access to quality maternal health care. It provides an analysis of some of the outcomes of the litigation and highlights the implications thereof on implementation of maternal health care in Kenya and beyond.

妇女和女孩获得全面的生殖保健,包括获得高质量的孕产妇保健服务,仍然是肯尼亚面临的一项挑战。最近的一项政府调查对2014年发生的近500例孕产妇死亡进行了评估,发现孕产妇保健质量存在差距,结论是90%以上的死亡妇女得到的孕产妇保健"不理想"。在肯尼亚,生殖权利中心(生殖权利中心)在其他战略中开展了公益诉讼,以挑战侵犯人权行为和卫生部门的系统性失败。2014年,该中心代表Josephine Majani向肯尼亚西部邦戈马高等法院提起诉讼,她被邦戈马县转诊医院的工作人员忽视和虐待,2013年,她曾到这家公共卫生机构分娩。本评注论述了肯尼亚孕产妇保健状况以及导致诉讼的行动,这些诉讼的具体目的是使人们能够获得高质量的孕产妇保健。它对诉讼的一些结果进行了分析,并强调了其对在肯尼亚和其他地区实施孕产妇保健的影响。
{"title":"Litigating to ensure access to quality maternal health care for women and girls in Kenya.","authors":"Beatrice Odallo,&nbsp;Evelyne Opondo,&nbsp;Martin Onyango","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1508172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1508172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to comprehensive reproductive health care for women and girls, including access to quality maternal health services remains a challenge in Kenya. A recent government enquiry assessing close to 500 maternal deaths that occurred in 2014 revealed gaps in the quality of maternal care, concluding that more than 90% of the women who had died had received \"suboptimal\" maternal care. In Kenya, the Center for Reproductive Rights (the Center) has undertaken public interest litigation among other strategies to challenge human rights violations and systematic failures within the health sector. In 2014, before the High Court of Bungoma in Western Kenya, the Center filed a case on behalf of Josephine Majani who had been neglected and abused by the staff of the Bungoma County Referral Hospital, a public health facility where she had gone to deliver in 2013. This commentary addresses the situation of maternal health care in Kenya and the actions leading to litigation that was specifically aimed at enabling access to quality maternal health care. It provides an analysis of some of the outcomes of the litigation and highlights the implications thereof on implementation of maternal health care in Kenya and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 53","pages":"123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1508172","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36435634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
The AIDS conference 2018: a critical moment 2018年艾滋病大会:一个关键时刻
Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1510602
S. Gruskin, J. Hussein
{"title":"The AIDS conference 2018: a critical moment","authors":"S. Gruskin, J. Hussein","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2018.1510602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1510602","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"26 1","pages":"10 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2018.1510602","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48420831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Zika virus - the glamour of a new illness, the practical abandonment of the mothers and new evidence on uncertain causality. 寨卡病毒——一种新疾病的魅力,对母亲的实际抛弃,以及不确定因果关系的新证据。
Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-11 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1397442
Simone G Diniz, Halana F Andrezzo
To appraise the impact of the Zika virus epidemics, we need to understand the challenges to reproductive justice posed by this new disease in a context of structural inequities. In August 2014, an outbreak of an illness with a flat pinkish rash, joint pain, bloodshot eyes, fever and headaches started in Natal, Northeast Brazil. Testing ruled out dengue and other potential causes. By March 2015, the illness had appeared in three different states, and in May 2015, researchers found that it was an outbreak of the Zika virus, transmitted by the same mosquito that is the vector for dengue and chikungunya viruses, the Aedes aegypti. Zika infection was previously associated with neurological complications, such as Guillian-Barré syndrome (GBS) in a few cases, but up to that moment, was generally thought as a relatively benign illness, a type of a “soft dengue”. By September 2015, medical providers in the States of Paraíba and Pernambuco reported increased cases of microcephaly and cerebral calcifications. Other illnesses were ruled out, and the tests for Zika virus were positive in the amniotic fluid of affected pregnant women in mid-November. In the following months, thousands of suspected cases of microcephaly and other neurological malformations emerged in Brazil, creating a global concern on this new public health and reproductive threat. In February 2016, looking in particular at the strong association, in time and place, between a rise in detected cases of congenital malformations, neurological complications and infection with the Zika virus, the World Health Organization considered that the situation met the conditions for a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The scientific interest in this new public health emergency led to an explosion of publications on the biological, epidemiological and clinical aspects, and on establishing the causality links between the virus and the congenital syndrome. In April 2016, a WHO report noted that “microcephaly and other fetal malformations potentially associated with Zika virus infection or suggestive of congenital infection” were reported in Brazil (1046 cases), Cape Verde (2 cases), Colombia (7 cases), French Polynesia (8 cases), Martinique (3 cases) and Panama (1 case). There were two additional cases, linked to a stay in Brazil. The series of neurological harms associated with the Zika virus was called congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). Although Zika virus has spread throughout Brazil, Latin America and other regions, the concentration of high rates of microcephaly has been reported only in the Northeast of Brazil, and basically in poorer areas. By mid-2016, evidence suggested that Zika can cause microcephaly, but the clustering pattern hints that other environmental, socio-economic or biological factors could be at play. Cases were concentrated in areas where there is little or no sanitation, with open sewage, and without a regular supply of clean drinking water (leading to the need to store w
{"title":"Zika virus - the glamour of a new illness, the practical abandonment of the mothers and new evidence on uncertain causality.","authors":"Simone G Diniz,&nbsp;Halana F Andrezzo","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2017.1397442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1397442","url":null,"abstract":"To appraise the impact of the Zika virus epidemics, we need to understand the challenges to reproductive justice posed by this new disease in a context of structural inequities. In August 2014, an outbreak of an illness with a flat pinkish rash, joint pain, bloodshot eyes, fever and headaches started in Natal, Northeast Brazil. Testing ruled out dengue and other potential causes. By March 2015, the illness had appeared in three different states, and in May 2015, researchers found that it was an outbreak of the Zika virus, transmitted by the same mosquito that is the vector for dengue and chikungunya viruses, the Aedes aegypti. Zika infection was previously associated with neurological complications, such as Guillian-Barré syndrome (GBS) in a few cases, but up to that moment, was generally thought as a relatively benign illness, a type of a “soft dengue”. By September 2015, medical providers in the States of Paraíba and Pernambuco reported increased cases of microcephaly and cerebral calcifications. Other illnesses were ruled out, and the tests for Zika virus were positive in the amniotic fluid of affected pregnant women in mid-November. In the following months, thousands of suspected cases of microcephaly and other neurological malformations emerged in Brazil, creating a global concern on this new public health and reproductive threat. In February 2016, looking in particular at the strong association, in time and place, between a rise in detected cases of congenital malformations, neurological complications and infection with the Zika virus, the World Health Organization considered that the situation met the conditions for a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The scientific interest in this new public health emergency led to an explosion of publications on the biological, epidemiological and clinical aspects, and on establishing the causality links between the virus and the congenital syndrome. In April 2016, a WHO report noted that “microcephaly and other fetal malformations potentially associated with Zika virus infection or suggestive of congenital infection” were reported in Brazil (1046 cases), Cape Verde (2 cases), Colombia (7 cases), French Polynesia (8 cases), Martinique (3 cases) and Panama (1 case). There were two additional cases, linked to a stay in Brazil. The series of neurological harms associated with the Zika virus was called congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). Although Zika virus has spread throughout Brazil, Latin America and other regions, the concentration of high rates of microcephaly has been reported only in the Northeast of Brazil, and basically in poorer areas. By mid-2016, evidence suggested that Zika can cause microcephaly, but the clustering pattern hints that other environmental, socio-economic or biological factors could be at play. Cases were concentrated in areas where there is little or no sanitation, with open sewage, and without a regular supply of clean drinking water (leading to the need to store w","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"25 49","pages":"21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2017.1397442","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35328611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Title, Table of Contents and Acknowledgements 标题、目录和致谢
Pub Date : 2017-11-30 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1413862
M. Onyango, Shirin Heidari, S. Krause, S. Chynoweth, M. Tanabe, A. Foster, Dabney P. Evans, Melissa M. Garcia, Sarah Knaster, S. Krause, T. McGinn, S. Rich, Meera Shah, P. Chaudhary, Giulia Vallese, Meera Thapa, Valerie Broch Alvarez, L. M. Pradhan, Kiran Baj, A. Radhakrishnan, Elena Sarver, Julie Freccero, Heleen Touquet, N. Tran, K. Harker, J. Lohani, O. Maharjan, Sake Jemelia Beda, Elizabeth Akinyi Odinga, A. Ouattara, C. Ouedraogo, Alison Greer, S. Krause, M. Hassan, Samira Sami, K. Kerber, Barbara Tomczyk, Ribka Amsalu, D. Jackson, Elaine Scudder
{"title":"Title, Table of Contents and Acknowledgements","authors":"M. Onyango, Shirin Heidari, S. Krause, S. Chynoweth, M. Tanabe, A. Foster, Dabney P. Evans, Melissa M. Garcia, Sarah Knaster, S. Krause, T. McGinn, S. Rich, Meera Shah, P. Chaudhary, Giulia Vallese, Meera Thapa, Valerie Broch Alvarez, L. M. Pradhan, Kiran Baj, A. Radhakrishnan, Elena Sarver, Julie Freccero, Heleen Touquet, N. Tran, K. Harker, J. Lohani, O. Maharjan, Sake Jemelia Beda, Elizabeth Akinyi Odinga, A. Ouattara, C. Ouedraogo, Alison Greer, S. Krause, M. Hassan, Samira Sami, K. Kerber, Barbara Tomczyk, Ribka Amsalu, D. Jackson, Elaine Scudder","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2017.1413862","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1413862","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"25 1","pages":"i - iv"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2017.1413862","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44870851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Uptake of postabortion care services and acceptance of postabortion contraception in Puntland, Somalia. 接受堕胎后护理服务和接受堕胎后避孕在索马里邦特兰。
Pub Date : 2017-11-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-12 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1402670
Kingsley Chukwumalu, Meghan C Gallagher, Sabine Baunach, Amy Cannon

Unsafe abortion is responsible for at least 9% of all maternal deaths worldwide; however, in humanitarian emergencies where health systems are weak and reproductive health services are often unavailable or disrupted, this figure is higher. In Puntland, Somalia, Save the Children International (SCI) implemented postabortion care (PAC) services to address the issue of high maternal morbidity and mortality due to unsafe abortion. Abortion is explicitly permitted by Somali law to save the life of a woman, but remains a sensitive topic due to religious and social conservatism that exists in the region. Using a multipronged approach focusing on capacity building, assurance of supplies and infrastructure, and community collaboration and mobilisation, the demand for PAC services increased as did the proportion of women who adopted a method of family planning post-abortion. From January 2013 to December 2015, a total of 1111 clients received PAC services at the four SCI-supported health facilities. The number of PAC clients increased from a monthly average of 20 in 2013 to 38 in 2015. During the same period, 98% (1090) of PAC clients were counselled for postabortion contraception, of which 955 (88%) accepted a contraceptive method before leaving the facility, with 30% opting for long-acting reversible contraception. These results show that comprehensive PAC services can be implemented in politically unstable, culturally conservative settings where abortion and modern contraception are sensitive and stigmatised matters among communities, health workers, and policy makers. However, like all humanitarian settings, large unmet needs exist for PAC services in Somalia.

不安全堕胎至少占全世界孕产妇死亡总数的9%;然而,在卫生系统薄弱、生殖健康服务往往无法获得或中断的人道主义紧急情况下,这一数字更高。在索马里邦特兰,国际救助儿童会实施了堕胎后护理服务,以解决不安全堕胎造成的产妇发病率和死亡率高的问题。索马里法律明确允许堕胎以挽救妇女的生命,但由于该地区存在的宗教和社会保守主义,堕胎仍然是一个敏感的话题。通过多管齐下的办法,着重于能力建设、供应和基础设施的保证以及社区合作和动员,对公共服务的需求增加了,堕胎后采取计划生育方法的妇女比例也增加了。从2013年1月至2015年12月,共有1111名客户在四个社会科学委员会支助的保健设施接受了PAC服务。PAC客户数量从2013年的平均每月20个增加到2015年的38个。在同一时期,98%(1090)的PAC客户接受了流产后避孕的咨询,其中955(88%)在离开设施前接受了避孕方法,其中30%选择了长效可逆避孕。这些结果表明,综合PAC服务可以在政治不稳定、文化保守的环境中实施,在这些环境中,堕胎和现代避孕在社区、卫生工作者和决策者中是敏感和污名化的问题。但是,像所有人道主义情况一样,索马里的公共事务委员会服务存在大量未得到满足的需求。
{"title":"Uptake of postabortion care services and acceptance of postabortion contraception in Puntland, Somalia.","authors":"Kingsley Chukwumalu,&nbsp;Meghan C Gallagher,&nbsp;Sabine Baunach,&nbsp;Amy Cannon","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2017.1402670","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1402670","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unsafe abortion is responsible for at least 9% of all maternal deaths worldwide; however, in humanitarian emergencies where health systems are weak and reproductive health services are often unavailable or disrupted, this figure is higher. In Puntland, Somalia, Save the Children International (SCI) implemented postabortion care (PAC) services to address the issue of high maternal morbidity and mortality due to unsafe abortion. Abortion is explicitly permitted by Somali law to save the life of a woman, but remains a sensitive topic due to religious and social conservatism that exists in the region. Using a multipronged approach focusing on capacity building, assurance of supplies and infrastructure, and community collaboration and mobilisation, the demand for PAC services increased as did the proportion of women who adopted a method of family planning post-abortion. From January 2013 to December 2015, a total of 1111 clients received PAC services at the four SCI-supported health facilities. The number of PAC clients increased from a monthly average of 20 in 2013 to 38 in 2015. During the same period, 98% (1090) of PAC clients were counselled for postabortion contraception, of which 955 (88%) accepted a contraceptive method before leaving the facility, with 30% opting for long-acting reversible contraception. These results show that comprehensive PAC services can be implemented in politically unstable, culturally conservative settings where abortion and modern contraception are sensitive and stigmatised matters among communities, health workers, and policy makers. However, like all humanitarian settings, large unmet needs exist for PAC services in Somalia.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"25 51","pages":"48-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2017.1402670","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35639815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Clinical outreach refresher trainings in crisis settings (S-CORT): clinical management of sexual violence survivors and manual vacuum aspiration in Burkina Faso, Nepal, and South Sudan. 危机环境中的临床外展进修培训(S-CORT):布基纳法索、尼泊尔和南苏丹性暴力幸存者的临床管理和手动真空抽吸。
Pub Date : 2017-11-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-18 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1405678
Nguyen Toan Tran, Kristen Harker, Wambi Maurice E Yameogo, Seni Kouanda, Tieba Millogo, Emebet Dlasso Menna, Jeevan Raj Lohani, Om Maharjan, Sake Jemelia Beda, Elizabeth Akinyi Odinga, Adama Ouattara, Charlemagne Ouedraogo, Alison Greer, Sandra Krause

During the early humanitarian response to a crisis, there is limited time to train health providers in the life-saving clinical services of the Minimum Initial Services Package (MISP) for Reproductive Health. The Training Partnership Initiative of the Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises developed the S-CORT model (Sexual and reproductive health Clinical Outreach Refresher Training) for service providers operating in acute humanitarian settings and needing to rapidly refresh their knowledge and skills. Through qualitative research, this study aimed to determine the operational enablers and barriers related to the implementation of two S-CORT modules: clinical management of sexual violence survivors (CMoSVS) and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA). Across three participating countries (Burkina Faso, Nepal, and South Sudan), 135 health staff attended the CMoSVS refresher training and 94 the MVA refresher training. Results from the focus group discussions and in-depth interviews suggest that the S-CORT approach is respectful of human rights and quality of care principles. Furthermore, it is potentially effective in enhancing the knowledge and skills of existing trained service providers, strengthening their capacity, and changing their attitudes towards abortion-related services, for example. The S-CORT is a promising model for implementation in the acute phase of an emergency upon stabilisation of the security situation. The model can also be integrated into broader post-crisis capacity development efforts. Future operational research should emphasise not only an assessment of new modules' contents, but whether implementing this refresher training model in remote outreach settings is feasible, effective, and efficient.

在对危机作出早期人道主义反应期间,对保健提供者进行生殖健康最低初步服务一揽子计划挽救生命的临床服务培训的时间有限。危机中的生殖健康问题机构间工作组的培训伙伴关系倡议为在紧急人道主义环境中开展业务并需要迅速更新其知识和技能的服务提供者制定了S-CORT模式(性健康和生殖健康临床外展进修培训)。通过定性研究,本研究旨在确定与实施两个S-CORT模块相关的操作推动因素和障碍:性暴力幸存者临床管理(CMoSVS)和手动真空抽吸(MVA)。在三个参与国(布基纳法索、尼泊尔和南苏丹),135名卫生工作人员参加了CMoSVS进修培训,94名卫生工作人员参加了MVA进修培训。焦点小组讨论和深度访谈的结果表明,S-CORT方法尊重人权和护理质量原则。此外,它可能有效地提高现有受过训练的服务提供者的知识和技能,加强他们的能力,并改变他们对堕胎有关服务的态度。S-CORT是在安全局势稳定后紧急情况的严重阶段实施的一种有希望的模式。该模型还可以整合到更广泛的危机后能力建设工作中。未来的运筹学研究不仅要强调对新模块内容的评估,还要强调在远程推广环境中实施这种复习培训模式是否可行、有效和高效。
{"title":"Clinical outreach refresher trainings in crisis settings (S-CORT): clinical management of sexual violence survivors and manual vacuum aspiration in Burkina Faso, Nepal, and South Sudan.","authors":"Nguyen Toan Tran,&nbsp;Kristen Harker,&nbsp;Wambi Maurice E Yameogo,&nbsp;Seni Kouanda,&nbsp;Tieba Millogo,&nbsp;Emebet Dlasso Menna,&nbsp;Jeevan Raj Lohani,&nbsp;Om Maharjan,&nbsp;Sake Jemelia Beda,&nbsp;Elizabeth Akinyi Odinga,&nbsp;Adama Ouattara,&nbsp;Charlemagne Ouedraogo,&nbsp;Alison Greer,&nbsp;Sandra Krause","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2017.1405678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1405678","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the early humanitarian response to a crisis, there is limited time to train health providers in the life-saving clinical services of the Minimum Initial Services Package (MISP) for Reproductive Health. The Training Partnership Initiative of the Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises developed the S-CORT model (Sexual and reproductive health Clinical Outreach Refresher Training) for service providers operating in acute humanitarian settings and needing to rapidly refresh their knowledge and skills. Through qualitative research, this study aimed to determine the operational enablers and barriers related to the implementation of two S-CORT modules: clinical management of sexual violence survivors (CMoSVS) and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA). Across three participating countries (Burkina Faso, Nepal, and South Sudan), 135 health staff attended the CMoSVS refresher training and 94 the MVA refresher training. Results from the focus group discussions and in-depth interviews suggest that the S-CORT approach is respectful of human rights and quality of care principles. Furthermore, it is potentially effective in enhancing the knowledge and skills of existing trained service providers, strengthening their capacity, and changing their attitudes towards abortion-related services, for example. The S-CORT is a promising model for implementation in the acute phase of an emergency upon stabilisation of the security situation. The model can also be integrated into broader post-crisis capacity development efforts. Future operational research should emphasise not only an assessment of new modules' contents, but whether implementing this refresher training model in remote outreach settings is feasible, effective, and efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"25 51","pages":"103-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2017.1405678","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35668334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Care with dignity in humanitarian crises: ensuring sexual and reproductive health and rights of displaced populations. 人道主义危机中有尊严的关怀:确保流离失所者的性健康和生殖健康及权利。
Pub Date : 2017-11-01 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1411093
Monica Adhiambo Onyango, Shirin Heidari
Each year, the number of people affected by humanitarian emergencies continues to increase, and the contexts become more complex, requiring thoughtful, intentional innovation and the creation of an evidence base that informs programme design, implementation and practice. In 2015, the numbers of people forcibly displaced from their homes hit a record high, with a 75% increase in two decades, rising from 37.3 million in 1996 to 65.3 million by the end of 2015. This translates to 24 persons being displaced from their homes every minute of every day in 2015, as a result of persecution, conflict, generalised violence or human rights violations. This trend is expected to continue. In addition, there were 19.2 million new displacements associated with natural disasters in 113 countries. The right to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is an indispensable part of the right to health and is dependent upon a number of factors that include availability and accessibility to quality evidence-based services. While entire populations benefit from access to SRH services and rights, women and adolescent girls face a host of particular vulnerabilities. It is estimated that around 26 million women and girls of reproductive age are living in emergency situations around the world and face increased threats to their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), requiring access to quality services. While services such as food aid, shelter, water and sanitation, security and basic health services are crucial in the early stages of a humanitarian crisis, the provision of reproductive health services has been recognised as an additional priority early in an emergency. Commendable progress has been made to make SRHR services available since the mid-90s, when a landmark report highlighted the lack of comprehensive SRH care among populations in crises. This state of affairs triggered the 1995 formation of the Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises (IAWG), a network of organisations dedicated to addressing the gaps in the provision of SRH services to communities affected by conflict and disaster. For more than two decades, organisations and individuals affiliated to IAWG have made concerted efforts to advance reproductive health through advocacy, research, standard setting and guidance development. To this end, major strides have been made, although much more remains to be done. In 2008, Reproductive Health Matters (RHM) dedicated a journal issue to the theme of conflict and crises, a well-timed issue that shed light on the devastating implications of conflict and crises on women and girls, highlighted ongoing response efforts and identified the unmet SRHR needs of populations in these fragile settings. Nearly 10 years later, with record numbers of people facing crises and displacement, it is once again time to draw attention to advances made, share best practices and discuss challenges in service implementation in crises and protracted humanitarian
{"title":"Care with dignity in humanitarian crises: ensuring sexual and reproductive health and rights of displaced populations.","authors":"Monica Adhiambo Onyango,&nbsp;Shirin Heidari","doi":"10.1080/09688080.2017.1411093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1411093","url":null,"abstract":"Each year, the number of people affected by humanitarian emergencies continues to increase, and the contexts become more complex, requiring thoughtful, intentional innovation and the creation of an evidence base that informs programme design, implementation and practice. In 2015, the numbers of people forcibly displaced from their homes hit a record high, with a 75% increase in two decades, rising from 37.3 million in 1996 to 65.3 million by the end of 2015. This translates to 24 persons being displaced from their homes every minute of every day in 2015, as a result of persecution, conflict, generalised violence or human rights violations. This trend is expected to continue. In addition, there were 19.2 million new displacements associated with natural disasters in 113 countries. The right to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is an indispensable part of the right to health and is dependent upon a number of factors that include availability and accessibility to quality evidence-based services. While entire populations benefit from access to SRH services and rights, women and adolescent girls face a host of particular vulnerabilities. It is estimated that around 26 million women and girls of reproductive age are living in emergency situations around the world and face increased threats to their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), requiring access to quality services. While services such as food aid, shelter, water and sanitation, security and basic health services are crucial in the early stages of a humanitarian crisis, the provision of reproductive health services has been recognised as an additional priority early in an emergency. Commendable progress has been made to make SRHR services available since the mid-90s, when a landmark report highlighted the lack of comprehensive SRH care among populations in crises. This state of affairs triggered the 1995 formation of the Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises (IAWG), a network of organisations dedicated to addressing the gaps in the provision of SRH services to communities affected by conflict and disaster. For more than two decades, organisations and individuals affiliated to IAWG have made concerted efforts to advance reproductive health through advocacy, research, standard setting and guidance development. To this end, major strides have been made, although much more remains to be done. In 2008, Reproductive Health Matters (RHM) dedicated a journal issue to the theme of conflict and crises, a well-timed issue that shed light on the devastating implications of conflict and crises on women and girls, highlighted ongoing response efforts and identified the unmet SRHR needs of populations in these fragile settings. Nearly 10 years later, with record numbers of people facing crises and displacement, it is once again time to draw attention to advances made, share best practices and discuss challenges in service implementation in crises and protracted humanitarian","PeriodicalId":32527,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"25 51","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09688080.2017.1411093","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35683158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
期刊
Reproductive Health Matters
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1