Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal最新文献

Background: Actuated devices can be beneficial for individuals with upper limb muscle weakness, offering extra force and grip. Utilising this type of assistive device can facilitate daily activities, thereby enhancing independence and overall quality of life. The development of actuated assistive devices has been growing, and current literature shows promise in their clinical use. However, they are not yet medically recommended by global guidelines and councils. Studies have suggested why assistive devices have barriers to access, but actuated devices have not been a focus in these discussions.

Objectives: To address this issue, a survey was conducted among professionals who prescribe and assess upper limb assistive devices. The survey aimed to gather their opinions and quantify the factors that might contribute to the limited use of actuated devices in the field.

Methodology: A web-based cross-sectional study was designed using Qualtrics, contained 25 items and was conducted between October 2023 and January 2024. The survey was piloted, validated, and ethically approved. Results were statistically analysed, and open questions underwent thematic analysis.

Findings: 87 Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) contributed to the survey, with a completion rate of 69% (60/87). Survey respondents predominately worked from the USA (72%). The survey revealed that 66% of respondents felt they did not have sufficient access to assistive devices and 58% indicated that outcome measures could be improved. They also noted that actuated devices needed to better meet user-centric needs. Barriers to prescribing these devices included a lack of awareness, experience and standardised prescription methods. In addition, the limited time with patients made decision-making and validation of an actuated device difficult.

Conclusion: AHP's have experience prescribing assistive devices but do not have access, knowledge, or clinical methods to assess the use of actuated devices. Future designs for actuated devices should focus on wearability, comfort, user satisfaction, safety and ease of use.

Background: Charcot foot deformity, a severe complication of diabetes, involves neuropathy and abnormal peak plantar pressure in the midfoot and forefoot. However, orthotic interventions and shoe modifications are used to address the sequelae of Charcot neuroarthropathy, offering different approaches to managing abnormal peak plantar pressure.

Objective: To compare the effects of three types of therapeutic offloading diabetic shoes; prefabricated, relasting, and double rocker-modified shoes on peak plantar pressure in the midfoot and forefoot of nonulcerated chronic Charcot foot during walking.

Methodology: A repeated measure design involved 15 participants (40% males and 60% females) with a mean age of 60.73 years (SD=10.50), with Charcot neuropathy. Participants were provided with three types of shoes; prefabricated, relasting, and double rocker-modified shoes, each equipped with the same custom-made insole (CMI). Plantar pressure was recorded while walking on level ground, focusing on the forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot. The study also investigated additional variables affecting plantar pressure distribution, including the pressure-time integral and contact area.

Findings: The type of shoe had distinct effects on the distribution of plantar pressure. The double rocker-modified shoe particularly impacted forefoot pressure during the terminal stance phase of the gait cycle. Peak plantar pressure at the forefoot increased by 5.37% with double rocker-modified shoes compared to relasting shoes. Both double rocker-modified and prefabricated shoes reduced midfoot peak plantar pressure by 8.73% and 11.97%, respectively. Similar trends were observed at the hindfoot, with reductions in peak plantar pressure. However, there were no significant differences in regional peak plantar pressure between the types of shoes except for the central forefoot (F (1.61, 22.5) = 5.69, p = 0.014).

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the effectiveness of prefabricated, relasting, and double rocker-modified shoes in reducing and redistributing peak plantar pressure in high-risk areas of chronic Charcot foot.

Background: While waiting to receive a prosthesis, individuals with amputations could benefit from using a temporary training prosthesis to expedite the rehabilitation process and prepare them for subsequent walking with their prosthesis.

Objectives: To design and build a temporary training prosthesis for people with a transtibial amputation.

Methodology: Various temporary training prostheses were designed and simulated using SolidWorks software, followed by fabricating and testing multiple prototypes. Initial tests were conducted on five able bodied subjects without amputation to evaluate comfort, ensure the prototype functioned as intended, and to refine the design. The final prototype design had no weight-bearing on the residual limb end and required the person to wear a shrinker or silicone liner.

Findings: SolidWorks simulations showed that the device could tolerate up to 200 kg load. Subjective feedback indicated that body weight is primarily supported by the thigh section, while partially utilizing the patellar tendon and tibial flares. The thigh section can be shifted 5 cm up or down and 2.5 cm to the front or back from the knee joint center (to enhance knee stability or function). Additionally, the thigh angle can be adjusted to 0, 5, 10, or 15 degrees to accommodate hip flexion contracture. The shank section width is adjustable and can be shifted up or down based on the residual limb shape. All five able-bodied participants successfully walked with the non-amputee version of the temporary prosthesis prototype and the device withstood walking, sitting, and standing loads.

Conclusion: An adjustable temporary training prosthesis was successfully designed, and pilot tested by five able-bodied individuals. Future testing will involve five experienced prosthetic users before conducting trials with individuals with a new transtibial amputation.

The purpose of this letter is to continue the dialogue regarding the paper "Evolving business models in Orthotics" in the Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal Volume 4, Issue2, No.3, 2021. In it we present the perspective of the current Alberta Association of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP) and provide additional context and information on historical events. Finally, we provide additional clarity on how costing is approached in the Province of Alberta (Canada) and the purported inequity in compensation between the two disciplines.

Background: Measurement of psychosocial adjustment after upper limb amputation (ULA) could be helpful in identifying persons who may benefit from interventions, such as psychotherapy and/or support groups. However, available measures of psychosocial adjustment after limb loss are currently designed for prosthetic users only.

Objective: To create a measure of psychosocial adjustment for persons with ULA that could be completed by individuals regardless of whether a prosthesis is use.

Methodology: We modified items from an existing Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Survey (TAPES) measure and generated new items pertinent to persons who did not use a prosthesis. Item content was refined through cognitive interviewing and pilot testing. A telephone survey of 727 persons with major ULA (63.6% male, mean age of 54.4) was conducted after pilot-testing. After exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), Rasch analyses were used to evaluate response categories, item fit and differential item functioning (DIF). Item-person maps, score distributions, and person and item reliability were examined. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a 50-person subsample.

Findings: EFA and CFA indicated a two-factor solution. Rasch analyses resulted in a 7-item Adjustment to Limitation subscale (CFI=0.96, TLI=0.95, RMSEA=0.128) and a 9-item Work and Independence subscale (CFI=0.935, TLI=0.913, RMSEA=0.193). Cronbach alpha and ICC were 0.82 and 0.63 for the Adjustment to Limitation subscale and 0.90 and 0.80 for the Work and Independence subscale, respectively.

Conclusions: This study developed the Psychosocial Adjustment to Amputation measure, which contains two subscales: 1) Adjustment to Limitation and 2) Work and Independence. The measure has sound structural validity, good person and item reliability, and moderate to good test-retest reliability.

Background: Biofeedback (BFB), the practice of providing real-time sensory feedback has been shown to improve gait rehabilitation outcomes. BFB training through rhythmic stimulation has the potential to improve spatiotemporal gait asymmetries while minimizing cognitive load by encouraging a synchronization between the user's gait cycle and an external rhythm.

Objective: The purpose of this work was to evaluate if rhythmic stimulation can improve the stance time symmetry ratio (STSR) and to compare vibrotactile to auditory stimulation. Gait parameters including velocity, cadence, stride length, double support time, and step length symmetry, were also examined.

Methodology: An experimental rhythmic stimulation system was developed, and twelve healthy adults (5 males), age 28.42 ± 10.93 years, were recruited to participate in walking trials. A unilateral ankle weight was used to induce a gait asymmetry to simulate asymmetry as commonly exhibited by individuals with lower limb amputation and other clinical disorders. Four conditions were evaluated: 1) No ankle weight baseline, 2) ankle weight without rhythmic stimulation, 3) ankle weight + rhythmic vibrotactile stimulation (RVS) using alternating motors and 4) ankle weight + rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) using a singletone metronome at the participant's self-selected cadence.

Findings: As expected the STSR became significantly more asymmetrical with the ankle weight (i.e. induced asymmetry condition). STSR improved significantly with RVS and RAS when compared to the ankle weight without rhythmic stimulation. Cadence also significantly improved with RVS and RAS compared to ankle weight without rhythmic stimulation. With the exception of double support time, the other gait parameters were unchanged from the ankle weight condition. There were no statistically significant differences between RVS and RAS.

Conclusion: This study found that rhythmic stimulation can improve the STSR when an asymmetry is induced. Moreover, RVS is at least as effective as auditory stimulation in improving STSR in healthy adults with an induced gait asymmetry. Future work should be extended to populations with mobility impairments and outside of laboratory settings.