Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal最新文献

Background: Existing trans-radial prosthetic socket designs are not optimised to facilitate reliable myoelectric control. Many socket designs pre-date the introduction of myoelectric devices. However, socket designs featuring improved biomechanical stability, notably longitudinal compression sockets, have emerged in more recent years. Neither the subsequent effects, if any, of stabilising the limb on myoelectric control nor in which arrangement to apply the compression have been reported.

Methodology: Twelve able-bodied participants completed two tasks whilst wearing a longitudinal compression socket simulator in three different configurations: 1) compressed, where the compression strut was placed on top of the muscle of interest, 2) relief, where the compression struts were placed either side of the muscle being recorded and 3) uncompressed, with no external compression. The tasks were 1) a single-channel myoelectric target tracking exercise, followed by 2), a high-intensity grasping task. The wearers' accuracy during the tracking task, the pressure at opposing sides of the simulator during contractions and the rate at which the limb fatigued were observed.

Findings: No significant difference between the tracking-task accuracy scores or rate of fatigue was observed for the different compression configurations. Pressure recordings from the compressed configuration showed that pressure was maintained at opposing sides of the simulator during muscle contractions.

Conclusion: Longitudinal compression does not inhibit single-channel EMG control, nor improve fatigue performance. Longitudinal compression sockets have the potential to improve the reliability of multi-channel EMG control due to the maintenance of pressure during muscle contractions.

Background: A posterior dynamic element ankle-foot orthosis (PDEAFO) uses a stiff carbon fibre strut to store and release energy during various mobility tasks, with the strut securely attached to the foot and shank-cuff sections. A design that allows the user to swap struts for specific activities could improve mobility by varying PDEAFO stiffness, but current approaches where bolts securely connect the strut to the orthosis make quick strut swapping time-consuming and impractical.

Objectives: Design a novel quick release AFO (QRAFO) that can enable daily living strut-swapping and thereby enable better ankle biomechanics for the person's chosen activity.

Methodology: The novel QRAFO enables device stiffness changes through a quick release mechanism that includes a quick-release key, weight-bearing pin, receptacle anchor, and immobilization pin. A prototype was modelled and simulated with SolidWorks. Mechanical tests were performed with an Instron 4482 machine to evaluate quick release mechanism strength with running and 20° slope downhill walking loads. Quick release efficiency was then evaluated via two quick release functional tests, with four participants wearing a 3D printed QRAFO.

Findings: Simulated stress on the weight bearing pin, anchor, and surrounding carbon fibre structure under running and downhill walking loads did not exceed the yielding stress. Mechanical tests verified the simulation results. Four participants successfully swapped the strut within 25.01 ± 3.66 seconds, outperforming the 60.48 ± 10.88 seconds result for the hand-tightened bolted strut. A learning evaluation with one participant showed that, after approximately 30 swapping iterations, swap time was consistently below 10 seconds.

Conclusion: The quick release mechanism accommodated running and slope walking loads, and allowed easy and fast strut removal and attachment, greatly reducing strut swap time compared to screw-anchor connections. Overall, the novel quick release AFO improved strut-swapping time without sacrificing device strength, thereby enabling people to use the most appropriate AFO stiffness for their current activity and hence improve mobility and quality of life.

Background: Following amputation, patients with lower limb amputations (LLA) are classified into different functional mobility levels (K-levels) ranging from K0 (lowest) to K4 (highest). However, K-level classification is often based on subjective criteria. Objective measures that are able to differentiate between K-levels can help to enhance the objectivity of K-level classification.

Objectives: The goal of this preliminary cross-sectional study was to investigate whether differences in hip muscle strength and balance parameters exist among patients with transfemoral amputations (TFA) assigned to different K-levels.

Methodology: Twenty-two participants with unilateral TFA were recruited for this study, with four participants assigned to K1 or K2, six assigned to K3 and twelve assigned to K4. Maximum isometric hip strength of the residual limb was assessed in hip flexion, abduction, extension, and adduction using a custom-made diagnostic device. Static balance was investigated in the bipedal stance on a force plate in eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate differences between K-level groups.

Findings: Statistical analyses revealed no significant differences in the parameters between the three K-level groups (p>0.05). Descriptive analysis showed that all hip strength parameters differed among K-level groups showing an increase in maximum hip torque from K1/2-classified participants to those classified as K4. Group differences were also present in all balance parameters. Increased sway was observed in the K1/2 group compared to the K4 group, especially for the EC condition.

Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, the magnitude of the differences indicates a distinction between K-level groups. These results suggest that residual limb strength and balance parameters may have the potential to be used as objective measures to assist K-level assignment for patients with TFA. This potential needs to be confirmed in future studies with a larger number of participants.

Background: Patients with neuromuscular knee-instability assisted with orthotic devices experience problems including pain, falls, mobility issues and limited engagement in daily activities.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse current real-life burden, needs and orthotic device outcomes in patients in need for advanced orthotic knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (KAFOs).

Methodology: An observer-based semi-structured telephone interview with orthotic care experts in Germany was applied. Interviews were transcribed and content-analysed. Quantitative questions were analysed descriptively.

Findings: Clinical experts from eight centres which delivered an average of 49.9 KAFOs per year and 13.3 microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot orthoses (MP-SSCOs) since product availability participated. Reported underlying conditions comprised incomplete paraplegia (18%), peripheral nerve lesions (20%), poliomyelitis (41%), post-traumatic lesions (8%) and other disorders (13%). The leading observed patient burdens were "restriction of mobility" (n=6), followed by "emotional strain" (n=5) and "impaired gait pattern" (n=4). Corresponding results for potential patient benefits were seen in "improved quality-of-life" (n=8) as well as "improved gait pattern" (n=8) followed by "high reliability of the orthosis" (n=7). In total, experts reported falls occurring in 71.5% of patients at a combined annual frequency of 7.0 fall events per year when using KAFOs or stance control orthoses (SCOs). In contrast, falls were observed in only 7.2 % of MPSSCO users.

Conclusion: Advanced orthotic technology might contribute to better quality of life of patients, improved gait pattern and perceived reliability of orthosis. In terms of safety a substantial decrease in frequency of falls was observed when comparing KAFO and MP-SSCO users.

Technological innovation has transformed how we communicate, work, and conduct business. Over the next decade how we experience health care both as health care professionals and as client-patients will also change significantly. This presents both an opportunity and a challenge to medical clinical professionals that are device-focused, including prosthetists orthotists, as they consider how best to adapt. Current prosthetic orthotic education and practice is heavily clinically weighted, with less emphasis being given to engineering and business skills. Yet all three are essential core elements of a successful, sustainable prosthetics orthotics practice. Furthermore, it is the latter two that will heavily influence the future face of prosthetics & orthotics. It is not certain how current prosthetic orthotic practitioners can best adapt in response. One solution, proposed in this editorial, could be by rebalancing their professional persona to equally weight the three essential core elements. The result, a Clinical Prosthetic Orthotic Technology Management Professional, would engage in a professional practice that is functionally grounded, uses a client-centric model and incorporate eight professional attributes: professional, advocate, scholar, leader, communicator, collaborator, assistive technology expert and business justification specialist.

Background: The number of patients receiving orthotics and prosthetic services is increasing globally. A way to investigate patients' insight about services provided to them is to evaluate their satisfaction with the received services. Furthermore, incorporating patients' preferences into practice is an inseparable part of evidence-based practice. Applying such information in practice can contribute to the enhancement of the quality of services, the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions, and finally, the economic growth of service centers.

Objectives: To evaluate patients' satisfaction with the orthotic and prosthetic devices and services provided by the orthotics and prosthetics clinic of Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Methodology: In this study, 173 people referring to the orthotics and prosthetics clinic of Iran University of Medical Sciences were recruited, and their satisfaction level was examined using the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey questionnaire (OPUS) through a phone interview.

Findings: Concerning the devices, the mean value of total satisfaction score was 74:00±19.80 and the highest score belonged to no wear or rupture of the clothes with their devices (mean value = 4.76±0.84). In terms of services, the mean value of total satisfaction score was 72.12 ± 15.90 with the highest score belonging to the politeness of the clinic staff (mean value = 4.92±0.57). When the time point from receiving service was taken into account, the patients who received the service for less than a year showed higher satisfaction level with the service (p=0.024). Although satisfaction with the device was slightly higher among the participants who used the devices for more than a year, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of device satisfaction.

Conclusions: The overall satisfaction level from the devices and services was relatively high. However, the satisfaction level with the costs and coordination of the staff with the physicians showed a decline.

This Editorial presents an overview of the uptake of clinical outcome measures in the prosthetics and orthotics sector and considers how the use of objective measures contribute to demonstrating value provided. A decade ago, payors began to demand objective data to document costs vs. benefits from prosthetic and orthotic providers. The speed with which the sector responded to help develop measures and to begin to integrate them into practice is remarkable. This suggests an encouraging resilience and ability to adapt on the part of the sector as other trends such as Values-Based Health Care emerge to challenge the sector.

Background: The human hand is critical in assisting with activities of daily living (ADL). Amputation of the hand can affect a person physically, socially and psychologically. Knowledge of outcome measures used to assess upper limb activity of intact and amputee populations may aid in guiding research to develop applicable measurement tools specific to the amputee population. Tools could aid developments in prosthetic design and prescription, which benefit both users and healthcare researchers.

Objectives: This literature review examined outcome measurement tools used with non-amputee and amputee populations to assess hand activity. The objectives were to identify which characteristics of hand activity are captured by currently available measurement tools.

Methodology: Searches were conducted using PubMed, Cochrane and ProQuest for studies investigating hand activity for amputee and non-amputee populations. A total of 15 studies were included. PRISMA guidelines were used to assist with study selection. Data extraction and narrative synthesis were carried out.

Findings: A total of 32 outcome measures were found. Frequently used tools were: Box and Block Test, Swedish Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, and range of motion. Studies employed a combination of 2 to 12 tools. Themes extracted were: importance of function and quality of life, the need for realistic tasks, and the need for outcome measures specific of the population.

Conclusion: There is a gap in research surrounding outcome measurement tools used to assess hand activity in the amputee population. A combination of outcome measures are required to obtain insight into the hand activities of intact and amputee populations. Function and quality of life are important aspects to consider when describing hand activity.

Background: Gait symmetry is the degree of equality of biomechanical parameters between limbs within a gait cycle. Human gait is highly symmetrical; however, in the presence of pathology, gait often lacks symmetry. Biofeedback (BFB) systems have demonstrated the potential to reduce gait asymmetry, improve gait function, and benefit overall long-term musculoskeletal health.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a BFB system and evaluate three unique BFB strategies, including bidirectional control - constant vibration (BC), bidirectional control - variable vibration (BV), and unidirectional control - variable vibration (UV) relevant to gait symmetry. The assessed feedback strategies were a combination of vibration frequency/amplitude levels, vibration thresholds, and vibrotactile stimuli from one and two vibrating motors (tactors). Learning effect and short-term retention were also assessed.

Methodology: Testing was performed using a custom BFB system that induces stance time asymmetries to modulate temporal gait symmetry. The BFB system continuously monitors specific gait events (heel-strike and toe-off) and calculates the symmetry ratio, based on the stance time of both limbs to provide real-time biomechanical information via the vibrating motors. Overall walking performance of ten (n=10) able-bodied individuals (age 24.8 ± 4.4 years) was assessed via metrics of symmetry ratio, symmetry ratio error, walking speed, and motor's vibration percentages.

Findings: All participants utilized BFB somatosensory information to modulate their symmetry ratio. UV feedback produced a greater change in symmetry ratio, and it came closer to the targeted symmetry ratio. Learning or short-term retention effects were minimal. Walking speeds were reduced with feedback compared to no feedback; however, UV walking speeds were significantly faster compared to BV and BC.

Conclusion: The outcomes of this study provide new insights into the development and implementation of feedback strategies for gait retraining BFB systems that may ultimately benefit individuals with pathological gait. Future work should assess longer-term use and long-term learning and retention effects of BFB systems in the populations of interest.

Background: The risk of tripping in people with amputation is greater than that of able-bodied individuals due to reduced toe clearance during the swing phase. Appropriate prosthetic suspension may increase toe clearance by providing more secured attachment between the residual limb and prosthetic socket. Research is lacking on the Unity suspension system's effect on swing toe clearance.

Methods: Twelve people with transtibial amputation were fitted with the Unity suspension system. After one month accommodation period, the person walked with active (ON) or inactive vacuum (OFF) in a CAREN-Extended virtual reality system, across multiple simulated real-world scenarios. Prosthetics minimum swing toe clearance, and kinematic data, while the vacuum was ON or OFF, were compared with the intact side and a group of 12 able-bodied individuals.

Results: Minimum swing toe clearance (MSTC) and knee flexion angle were larger on the prosthetic side (active and inactive vacuum) compared to both the intact side and the control group. However, hip flexion angle on the prosthetic side was approximately 17% smaller than the control group. Unlike the control group, MSTC with active and inactive vacuum suspension was not significantly different between level walking and other walking conditions. Finally, among all walking conditions, the lowest swing toe clearance for both control and the amputee groups was recorded when the limb was at the top of a side-slope.

Conclusion: An effective suspension system could improve toe clearance; however, significant differences were not found between active and inactive vacuum conditions. The likelihood of inappropriate foot contact on side-slope ground might be greater than other walking conditions for both able-bodied and amputee groups, possibly leading to stumbling or falling.