Identities最新文献_第3页

Plato, Adorno, and the Dialectic 柏拉图，阿多诺和辩证法

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2021-12-23 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.2

M. Kennel

This essay shows substantial connections between Plato’s dialectical approach in The Republic and Adorno’s 1958 lectures in An Introduction to Dialectics. Although the relationship between Adorno and Aristotle has received some attention, little work has been done either demonstrating or making connections between Plato and Adorno, especially on the topic of the dialectic. This is likely because Adorno himself has little to say about Plato’s dialectic, although he does refer often to Plato’s ideas and forms, and sometimes to his aesthetics. This essay reads against the grain to show how Plato and Adorno conceive of dialectical thinking in strikingly similar ways that run parallel with their discontinuities, and concludes with the suggestion that the figure of chiasmus is well-positioned to push the limits of dialectical thinking.

这篇文章展示了柏拉图在《理想国》中的辩证方法与阿多诺1958年在《辩证法导论》中的演讲之间的实质性联系。虽然阿多诺和亚里士多德之间的关系受到了一些关注，但很少有人做过证明或建立柏拉图和阿多诺之间的联系，特别是在辩证法的主题上。这很可能是因为阿多诺自己很少谈及柏拉图的辩证法，尽管他确实经常提到柏拉图的思想和形式，有时也提到他的美学。这篇文章反其行之，展示了柏拉图和阿多诺如何以惊人相似的方式构想辩证思维，这些方式与他们的不连续性并行，并以暗示交错的形象很好地定位于推动辩证思维的极限。

引用次数: 0

François Laruelle: Pour une pensée-fiction a Review Essay on François Laruelle’s Tétralogos: Un opéra de philosophies francois Laruelle: Pour une pensee -fiction a Review Essay on francois Laruelle的四部曲:哲学歌剧

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.486

Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, S. Valdinoci

F. Laruelle soumet à notre attention son Tétralogos, un Opéra de Philosophies. Le but qui est nôtre est de faire justice à l’endroit d’un ouvrage fondamental. L’enjeu est de grande importance, surtout à une époque saturée par les propos historiens—en philosophie précisément. En l’occurrence il importe de s’interroger sur le projet laruellien. L’Essentiel, ici, tient en deux mots. L’invention philosophique est le problème-clef. Telle est la force de cette question, totalement originale. Il est urgent de produire une Fiction, c’est-à-dire un processus qui crée en se créant, ou qui invente en s’inventant. Ce faisant nous reprenons la démarche des grands Romantiques s’exprimant après Kant, en lien avec Kant. Chez ces derniers il faut répéter que le souci d’une esthétique est patent. Et il s’agit de conjoindre alors esthétique et esthésique. Telle est la portée du concept de fiction. Chez F. Laruelle la théorisarion passe par ailleurs, du côté de la connaissance dont on bénéfice ou qu’on ignore. En ce sens et à notre avis, Laruelle échappe au nihilisme passif de nos contemporains. Mais Kant n’est pas adopté tout simplement. Car la fiction, selon F. Laruelle, est positive, et surtout pas fictive. Elle est fictionnante plus que nouménalement ; elle invente dans un réel « écouménal » qui n’est pas ectypal pour autant. Avec Laruelle, nous quittons la psychologie des Facultés, et même celle qui plus tard sera reprise par Modernes et Postmodernes. La fiction, bien entendue, est de ressort créateur. Elle dit inventer du réel et ce dans le réel. Elle est de/dans le réel. Esthésique et esthétique collaborent unement. Et ce encore en brisant la contemporanéité illusoire de la fonction sujet et de la fonction objet. Oui : le fictionnement invente en s’inventant, fait un effect dans l’affect. En termes laruelliens, une Tétralogie, ici très puissante, est un domaine de référence. Par exemple, il convient de dire avec force que la Philosophie non-standard touche à l’immense, alors que la Culture Europe, ou Culture Occident, compose sans broncher ni additivement, ni soustractivement. En résumé, la mesure projective, ou de mensuration, qui est effective, éloigne de l’immensité affective, tandis que la démesure, celle qui mord sur soi, s’effondre dans son soi, mais dans un potentiel non-philosophique, ou en Univers unionnant. Depuis son soi d’Univers, travaille un forcing, comme le conçoivent Cohen et Badiou. Ce dernier modélise scientistement le passage de l’Être à l’Événement. Chez Laruelle, on échappe totalement au scientisme malgré l’avis des tenants idéologisants de notre culture Europe. Nous pensons aux péri-philosophes de l’Institution, en France notamment.

F. Laruelle向我们展示了他的四部曲，一部哲学歌剧。我们的目标是为一项基本工作伸张正义。这是一个非常重要的问题，尤其是在一个充斥着历史评论的时代——尤其是在哲学领域。在这种情况下，有必要对laruellien项目提出质疑。这里的要点可以用两个词来概括。哲学上的发明是关键问题。这就是这个完全原创的问题的力量所在。我们迫切需要一部小说，也就是说，一个通过创造自己来创造的过程，或者通过创造自己来创造的过程。在这样做的过程中，我们回到了伟大的浪漫主义者在康德之后表达自己的方法，与康德联系在一起。对于后者，我们必须重申，对美学的关注是显而易见的。这是一个美学和美学相结合的问题。这就是小说概念的意义所在。在F. Laruelle的著作中，理论从知识的角度出发，我们要么受益，要么被忽视。从这个意义上说，在我们看来，Laruelle逃脱了我们同时代人的被动虚无主义。但康德并不是简单地采用的。因为根据F. Laruelle的说法，小说是积极的，尤其是不是虚构的。它是虚构的，而不是虚构的;她在一个真实的“ecoumenal”中发明，但这并不是ectypal。有了Laruelle，我们就离开了能力心理学，甚至是后来被现代和后现代所采用的能力心理学。当然，小说具有创造性。它说在现实中创造现实。它来自/在现实中。美学与美学携手合作。这也是通过打破主体功能和客体功能的虚幻的同时性来实现的。是的:小说通过发明自己来发明，在情感上产生影响。用laruelliens的术语来说，一个非常强大的四部曲是一个参考领域。例如，必须强调的是，非标准哲学涉及的是无穷大，而欧洲文化或西方文化的构成既不加也不减。简而言之，投射测量，或测量，是有效的，远离情感的浩瀚，而过度，咬自己，崩溃在它自己，但在一个非哲学的潜力，或在一个统一的宇宙。正如科恩和巴迪欧所设想的那样，从他的宇宙自我开始，一种强迫发挥作用。后者科学地模拟了从存在到事件的过渡。在拉鲁埃尔，我们完全避开了科学主义，尽管我们欧洲文化的意识形态支持者提出了意见。我们想到了制度的边缘哲学家，尤其是在法国。

{"title":"François Laruelle: Pour une pensée-fiction a Review Essay on François Laruelle’s Tétralogos: Un opéra de philosophies","authors":"Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, S. Valdinoci","doi":"10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.486","url":null,"abstract":"F. Laruelle soumet à notre attention son Tétralogos, un Opéra de Philosophies. Le but qui est nôtre est de faire justice à l’endroit d’un ouvrage fondamental. L’enjeu est de grande importance, surtout à une époque saturée par les propos historiens—en philosophie précisément. En l’occurrence il importe de s’interroger sur le projet laruellien. L’Essentiel, ici, tient en deux mots. L’invention philosophique est le problème-clef. Telle est la force de cette question, totalement originale. Il est urgent de produire une Fiction, c’est-à-dire un processus qui crée en se créant, ou qui invente en s’inventant. Ce faisant nous reprenons la démarche des grands Romantiques s’exprimant après Kant, en lien avec Kant. Chez ces derniers il faut répéter que le souci d’une esthétique est patent. Et il s’agit de conjoindre alors esthétique et esthésique. Telle est la portée du concept de fiction. Chez F. Laruelle la théorisarion passe par ailleurs, du côté de la connaissance dont on bénéfice ou qu’on ignore. En ce sens et à notre avis, Laruelle échappe au nihilisme passif de nos contemporains. Mais Kant n’est pas adopté tout simplement. Car la fiction, selon F. Laruelle, est positive, et surtout pas fictive. Elle est fictionnante plus que nouménalement ; elle invente dans un réel « écouménal » qui n’est pas ectypal pour autant. Avec Laruelle, nous quittons la psychologie des Facultés, et même celle qui plus tard sera reprise par Modernes et Postmodernes. La fiction, bien entendue, est de ressort créateur. Elle dit inventer du réel et ce dans le réel. Elle est de/dans le réel. Esthésique et esthétique collaborent unement. Et ce encore en brisant la contemporanéité illusoire de la fonction sujet et de la fonction objet. Oui : le fictionnement invente en s’inventant, fait un effect dans l’affect. En termes laruelliens, une Tétralogie, ici très puissante, est un domaine de référence. Par exemple, il convient de dire avec force que la Philosophie non-standard touche à l’immense, alors que la Culture Europe, ou Culture Occident, compose sans broncher ni additivement, ni soustractivement. En résumé, la mesure projective, ou de mensuration, qui est effective, éloigne de l’immensité affective, tandis que la démesure, celle qui mord sur soi, s’effondre dans son soi, mais dans un potentiel non-philosophique, ou en Univers unionnant. Depuis son soi d’Univers, travaille un forcing, comme le conçoivent Cohen et Badiou. Ce dernier modélise scientistement le passage de l’Être à l’Événement. Chez Laruelle, on échappe totalement au scientisme malgré l’avis des tenants idéologisants de notre culture Europe. Nous pensons aux péri-philosophes de l’Institution, en France notamment.","PeriodicalId":33334,"journal":{"name":"Identities","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84287353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

An Algorithmic Socialism in Defense of the Lived Without Life: A Political Proposal through Capitalism’s Holocaust of Animals by Katerina Kolozova 为没有生命的生活辩护的算法社会主义:通过资本主义对动物的大屠杀提出的政治建议，卡特琳娜·科洛佐娃

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.484

Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Oscar Pichardo Isaak

One of the main cores of Katerina Kolozova’s thought is to overcome the impasses left behind by post-structuralism through the non-philosophy of François Laruelle. That is why it should come as no surprise that Capitalism’s Holocaust of Animals: A Non-Marxist Critique of Capital, Philosophy and Patriarchy begins with Foucault’s sentence regarding the death of man. It is an inescapable closure for philosophy, to such an extent that many postmodern thinkers also preferred to declare the end of philosophy alongside the “human” as a category. On the other hand, non-philosophy does not seek any form of annihilation, but rather, to think according to the One as the foreclosed Real, showing that most of the philosophical principles are only positions, thus finding a democracy of thought. Kolozova constructs a non-human epistemology, not yet present in Foucault’s epistemological statement, in dialogue with those theorists who sought to think about how to transcend the borders of the human. The dialogue is particularly fertile when dealing with Donna Haraway’s post-humanist work, yet it remains a critical dialogue. Faced with the monstrosity of the cyborg, Kolozova seeks to establish the method of dualysis of Laruelle’s non-philosophy. This means that she makes a distinction between the Real and language, putting them in a unilateral rather than dialectical relationship, in the sense that both coexist without being determined by each other. In the case of Kolozova’s work, the Real includes the meaningless physicality of animality, and the signifying automaton includes technology.

卡捷琳娜·科洛佐娃思想的主要核心之一是通过拉鲁埃尔的非哲学来克服后结构主义留下的僵局。这就是为什么《资本主义对动物的大屠杀:对资本、哲学和父权制的非马克思主义批判》从福柯关于人的死亡的判决开始，这应该不足为奇。对于哲学来说，这是一个不可避免的终结，以至于许多后现代思想家也倾向于将哲学的终结与“人”作为一个范畴一起宣布。另一方面，非哲学并不寻求任何形式的湮灭，而是根据“一”作为被取消的“实在”来思考，这表明大多数哲学原则只是立场，从而找到了思想的民主。Kolozova构建了一种非人类的认识论，在福柯的认识论陈述中还没有出现，在与那些试图思考如何超越人类边界的理论家的对话中。当谈到唐娜·哈拉威的后人文主义作品时，这种对话尤其丰富，但它仍然是一种批判性的对话。面对生化人的狰狞，科洛佐娃试图建立拉鲁埃尔非哲学的二元分析方法。这意味着她在真实和语言之间做出了区分，将它们置于单方而非辩证的关系中，在某种意义上，两者共存而不被彼此决定。在Kolozova的作品中，“真实”包括了动物性的毫无意义的物质性，而“能指的自动机”则包括了技术。

{"title":"An Algorithmic Socialism in Defense of the Lived Without Life: A Political Proposal through Capitalism’s Holocaust of Animals by Katerina Kolozova","authors":"Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Oscar Pichardo Isaak","doi":"10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.484","url":null,"abstract":"One of the main cores of Katerina Kolozova’s thought is to overcome the impasses left behind by post-structuralism through the non-philosophy of François Laruelle. That is why it should come as no surprise that Capitalism’s Holocaust of Animals: A Non-Marxist Critique of Capital, Philosophy and Patriarchy begins with Foucault’s sentence regarding the death of man. It is an inescapable closure for philosophy, to such an extent that many postmodern thinkers also preferred to declare the end of philosophy alongside the “human” as a category. On the other hand, non-philosophy does not seek any form of annihilation, but rather, to think according to the One as the foreclosed Real, showing that most of the philosophical principles are only positions, thus finding a democracy of thought. Kolozova constructs a non-human epistemology, not yet present in Foucault’s epistemological statement, in dialogue with those theorists who sought to think about how to transcend the borders of the human. The dialogue is particularly fertile when dealing with Donna Haraway’s post-humanist work, yet it remains a critical dialogue. Faced with the monstrosity of the cyborg, Kolozova seeks to establish the method of dualysis of Laruelle’s non-philosophy. This means that she makes a distinction between the Real and language, putting them in a unilateral rather than dialectical relationship, in the sense that both coexist without being determined by each other. In the case of Kolozova’s work, the Real includes the meaningless physicality of animality, and the signifying automaton includes technology.","PeriodicalId":33334,"journal":{"name":"Identities","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88718594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sciences, Philosophies, and the Question of Borders 科学、哲学和边界问题

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.485

Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, A. Schmid, Jeremy R. Smith

This essay contributes in part to the discussion of the concept of the border [frontière] and its relations between philosophies and sciences present within the work Épistémologie des frontières. It suggests that borders function as both a separation and a union between the domains of philosophies and sciences in their multiplicity. Borders are determinant in the times of interdisciplinarity, and such investigations are necessary because the accustomed links between philosophies and sciences can no longer be assumed. This essay proposes some hypotheses concerning methodology and the relation to the real to exercise a modelization as the articulation of multiple points of view. Modelization allows for the invention of democratic pragmatics of philosophy/philosophies towards a global re-evaluation of the relations that disciplines, such as the sciences and ethics, share with philosophy

本文在一定程度上有助于讨论边界[fronti]的概念及其在Épistémologie des fronti著作中呈现的哲学和科学之间的关系。它表明，边界在哲学和科学的多样性领域之间既起分离作用，又起联合作用。在跨学科的时代，边界是决定性的，这样的研究是必要的，因为哲学和科学之间的习惯联系不再被假设。本文提出了一些关于方法论和与现实的关系的假设，以将建模作为多种观点的表达。模式化允许哲学/哲学的民主实用主义的发明，以全球重新评估学科之间的关系，如科学和伦理学，与哲学共享

引用次数: 0

Through Exchange: Karatani Compared With Marx 通过交换:卡拉塔尼与马克思的比较

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.480

Vincenzo maria Di mino

The following paper has as its object the political philosophy of K. Karatani, in particular its relationship with the work of Marx. Japanese philosopher, in fact, reinterprets some elements of Marxian theory in the light of Kantian categories, hybridizing the ethical and moral theory of the latter with the critique of the political economy of the former. The result of Karatani's project can be seen, in particular, in two works. With the first, Transcritique, Karatani moves into the realm of philosophy to construct a method that holds the two theoretical poles together. The concept of 'Transcritique', in fact, represents the junction between Kantian and Marxian insights. With the second work, 'The Structure of World History', the Japanese philosopher shifts the analytical focus from ethics to economics, proposing a different interpretation of capitalism and its historical cycles. The shift of the observation of the capitalist system from the sphere of production to that of exchange represents the analytical novelty. Carrying through to the end the methodology developed in the previous work, Karatani traces back to exchange all the productive, institutional and political dynamics produced over time. Cycles of accumulation thus become cycles of exchange. The author, in fact, determines a correspondence between the specific modes of exchange and the consequent political structures, highlighting the centrality that money occupies, both in the theoretical elaboration and in political reality. The prevailing mode of production, based on the exchange of commodities, relies on the absolute mobility of money and on the strength of the state political institution, which acts as a hinge between the global dimension of exchanges and the territorial need for the appropriation of surplus-value. Karatani's critique is embodied in a political proposal, articulated through two key figures: community and cosmopolitanism. With the first term, the philosopher opposes the materiality of human relationships based on reciprocity to the abstract equivalence of economic relationships. By the second term, he shows the need for an extended political practice in which the pursuit of local freedom goes hand in hand with the realization of global justice. The paper traces these themes both through direct exposure of Karatani's work and by offering critical comparisons with other authors who have addressed similar issues. Finally, the purpose of this paper is to emphasize the originality of the Japanese author's philosophical-historical work, suspended between utopia and pragmatism, also through criticism, in order to highlight its strengths and underline its potential weaknesses.

本文的研究对象是卡拉塔尼的政治哲学，特别是其与马克思著作的关系。事实上，这位日本哲学家根据康德的范畴重新诠释了马克思主义理论的某些要素，将后者的伦理和道德理论与前者的政治经济学批判相结合。卡拉塔尼项目的成果可以在两件作品中看到。在第一部《跨历史》中，卡拉塔尼进入哲学领域，构建了一种将两个理论极点结合在一起的方法。事实上，“跨经典”的概念代表了康德主义和马克思主义见解的结合。在第二部作品《世界史的结构》中，这位日本哲学家将分析焦点从伦理学转移到经济学，对资本主义及其历史周期提出了不同的解释。对资本主义制度的观察从生产领域转向交换领域，这是分析上的新颖性。卡拉塔尼将之前工作中发展起来的方法论贯彻到底，追溯到了交换随着时间的推移而产生的所有生产、制度和政治动态。这样，积累的循环就变成了交换的循环。事实上，作者确定了特定的交换模式与随之而来的政治结构之间的对应关系，强调了货币在理论阐述和政治现实中所占据的中心地位。以商品交换为基础的主流生产方式，依赖于货币的绝对流动性和国家政治制度的力量，而国家政治制度在全球范围的交换和占有剩余价值的地域需求之间起着枢纽作用。卡拉塔尼的批判体现在一个政治建议中，通过两个关键人物:社区和世界主义来表达。在第一个术语中，哲学家将基于互惠的人际关系的物质性与经济关系的抽象等价性对立起来。在第二个任期内，他展示了扩大政治实践的必要性，在这种实践中，对地方自由的追求与对全球正义的实现齐头并进。本文通过直接接触卡拉塔尼的作品，并与其他解决类似问题的作者进行批判性比较，追溯了这些主题。最后，本文的目的是强调日本作者的哲学历史作品的原创性，在乌托邦和实用主义之间徘徊，也通过批评，以突出其优势，并强调其潜在的弱点。

{"title":"Through Exchange: Karatani Compared With Marx","authors":"Vincenzo maria Di mino","doi":"10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.480","url":null,"abstract":"The following paper has as its object the political philosophy of K. Karatani, in particular its relationship with the work of Marx. Japanese philosopher, in fact, reinterprets some elements of Marxian theory in the light of Kantian categories, hybridizing the ethical and moral theory of the latter with the critique of the political economy of the former. The result of Karatani's project can be seen, in particular, in two works. With the first, Transcritique, Karatani moves into the realm of philosophy to construct a method that holds the two theoretical poles together. The concept of 'Transcritique', in fact, represents the junction between Kantian and Marxian insights. With the second work, 'The Structure of World History', the Japanese philosopher shifts the analytical focus from ethics to economics, proposing a different interpretation of capitalism and its historical cycles. The shift of the observation of the capitalist system from the sphere of production to that of exchange represents the analytical novelty. Carrying through to the end the methodology developed in the previous work, Karatani traces back to exchange all the productive, institutional and political dynamics produced over time. Cycles of accumulation thus become cycles of exchange. The author, in fact, determines a correspondence between the specific modes of exchange and the consequent political structures, highlighting the centrality that money occupies, both in the theoretical elaboration and in political reality. The prevailing mode of production, based on the exchange of commodities, relies on the absolute mobility of money and on the strength of the state political institution, which acts as a hinge between the global dimension of exchanges and the territorial need for the appropriation of surplus-value. Karatani's critique is embodied in a political proposal, articulated through two key figures: community and cosmopolitanism. With the first term, the philosopher opposes the materiality of human relationships based on reciprocity to the abstract equivalence of economic relationships. By the second term, he shows the need for an extended political practice in which the pursuit of local freedom goes hand in hand with the realization of global justice. The paper traces these themes both through direct exposure of Karatani's work and by offering critical comparisons with other authors who have addressed similar issues. Finally, the purpose of this paper is to emphasize the originality of the Japanese author's philosophical-historical work, suspended between utopia and pragmatism, also through criticism, in order to highlight its strengths and underline its potential weaknesses.","PeriodicalId":33334,"journal":{"name":"Identities","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88844261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal Kirn; a review by Naum Trajanovski 党派反档案:追溯南斯拉夫人民解放斗争中艺术与记忆的断裂Naum Trajanovski的评论

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.483

Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Naum Trajanovski

Author(s): Naum TrajanovskiTitle (English): A Review of the Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal KirnJournal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021).Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - SkopjePage Range: 106-108Page Count: 3Citation (English): Naum Trajanovski, “A Review of the Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal Kirn,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021): 106-108.Author BiographyNaum Trajanovski, Graduate School for Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences.Naum Trajanovski (Graduate School for Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences) is a PhD candidate at the GSSR. He was a project co-coordinator at the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity (2017) and a researcher at the Faculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University – Skopje (2018-2020). His major academic interests include memory politics in North Macedonia and sociological knowledge transfer in 1960s Eastern Europe. He authored several papers and a monograph, in Macedonian, on the memory politics in the state after 1991.

作者:纳姆·特拉亚诺夫斯基标题(英文):党派反档案回顾:追溯南斯拉夫人民解放斗争中艺术与记忆的断裂作者:盖尔·柯恩期刊参考文献:身份:政治、性别与文化杂志，第18卷，第1-2期(2021)。出版者:社会科学与人文研究所- skopjpage范围:106-108页数:3引文(英文):Naum Trajanovski，“党派反档案的回顾:追溯南斯拉夫人民解放斗争中的艺术和记忆的破裂，盖尔·柯恩，”身份:政治，性别和文化杂志，卷18,No. 1-2(2021): 106-108。作者简介:纳姆·特拉亚诺夫斯基，波兰科学院哲学与社会学研究所社会研究研究生院。Naum Trajanovski(波兰科学院哲学与社会学研究所社会研究研究生院)是GSSR的博士候选人。他是欧洲网络纪念和团结的项目联合协调员(2017年)，斯科普里西里尔和梅迪奥斯大学哲学系研究员(2018-2020年)。他的主要学术兴趣包括北马其顿的记忆政治和20世纪60年代东欧的社会学知识转移。他以马其顿语撰写了几篇论文和一本专著，探讨1991年后该国的记忆政治。

{"title":"The Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal Kirn; a review by Naum Trajanovski","authors":"Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Naum Trajanovski","doi":"10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.483","url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Naum Trajanovski\u0000Title (English): A Review of the Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal Kirn\u0000Journal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021).\u0000Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - Skopje\u0000Page Range: 106-108\u0000Page Count: 3\u0000Citation (English): Naum Trajanovski, “A Review of the Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal Kirn,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021): 106-108.\u0000Author Biography\u0000Naum Trajanovski, Graduate School for Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences.\u0000Naum Trajanovski (Graduate School for Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences) is a PhD candidate at the GSSR. He was a project co-coordinator at the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity (2017) and a researcher at the Faculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University – Skopje (2018-2020). His major academic interests include memory politics in North Macedonia and sociological knowledge transfer in 1960s Eastern Europe. He authored several papers and a monograph, in Macedonian, on the memory politics in the state after 1991.","PeriodicalId":33334,"journal":{"name":"Identities","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83883863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Mimetic Machines in the Uncanny Valley 恐怖谷中的模拟机器

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2021-12-08 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.482

Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, K. Spassova

Uncanny valley (不気味の谷 ) is a notion introduced by the Japanese robotics professor Masahiro Mori in 1970. The basic claim of his hypothesis states that the anthropomorphic machines cause uncanny effect due to their imperfect resemblance to the human. Humanoids seem almost like people, but exactly the distance of this almost provokes hot debates. There are two trends in robotics, animation, architecture, and computer games. The first trend seeks to overcome the uncanny valley, constructing such an incredible machine that perfectly mimics human actions. The second trend – Masahiro Mori takes this side – consciously constructs non-anthropomorphic machines. The machine’s appearance, structure, shape, proportion of the parts, and motion must be visibly different from the human ones. The term uncanny valley appears in a European context soon after its introduction, due to Jasia Reichardt’s translation in 1978. She is an art critic and curator who is interested in the role of cybernetics in art. The joint between the uncanny valley in robotics and the legacy of Freud and Jentsch is established with this translation at the intersection point between aesthetics and science. This link opens new fields to theoretical and aesthetic imagination. Author(s): Kamelia SpassovaTitle (English): Mimetic Machines in the Uncanny ValleyJournal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021).Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - SkopjePage Range: 22-33Page Count: 12Citation (English): Kamelia Spassova, “Mimetic Machines in the Uncanny Valley,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021): 22-33.Author BiographyKamelia Spassova, University of SofiaKamelia Spassova is Associate professor at the Literary Theory Department at the University of Sofia, Bulgaria. She is a lecturer at the Slavic Institute, Department of Philosophy, University of Cologne (2016-2018). She has published in Bulgaria a theoretical book on the poetics of example: Event and Example in Plato and Aristotle (2012), which deals with the tension between literary example and exemplary work in philosophical and theoretical discourses. She has developed the project “Doppelganger as a Political Figure” (2014-2015) in the Centre for Advanced Study Sofia (CAS), an independent institution for scholarship in the humanities and social sciences. In her latest book Modern Mimesis. Self-reflexivity in Literature (2021) she works on the transformations of the concept of mimesis in the 20th century.

恐怖谷(Uncanny valley)是日本机器人学教授森正弘(Masahiro Mori)在1970年提出的概念。他的假设的基本主张是，拟人机器由于与人类的不完全相似而产生了不可思议的效果。类人机器人看起来几乎和人类一样，但这种距离几乎引发了激烈的争论。在机器人、动画、建筑和电脑游戏方面有两种趋势。第一个趋势试图克服恐怖谷，建造这样一个不可思议的机器，完美地模仿人类的行为。第二种趋势——森正弘(Masahiro Mori)站在这一边——有意识地构建非拟人化的机器。机器的外观、结构、形状、零件比例和运动必须与人的明显不同。由于1978年Jasia Reichardt的翻译，恐怖谷一词在引入后不久就出现在欧洲语境中。她是一位艺术评论家和策展人，对控制论在艺术中的作用感兴趣。机器人的恐怖谷与弗洛伊德和詹奇的遗产之间的联系，是在美学和科学的交叉点上建立起来的。这一联系为理论和美学想象开辟了新的领域。作者:Kamelia SpassovaTitle(英文):Uncanny valley中的Mimetic Machines期刊参考:身份:Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2(2021)。出版社:社会科学与人文研究所- SkopjePage范围:22-33页数:12引文(英文):Kamelia Spassova，“恐怖谷中的模仿机器”，身份:政治，性别和文化杂志，Vol. 18, No. 1-2(2021): 22-33。作者简介kamelia Spassova，保加利亚索非亚大学文学理论系副教授。她是科隆大学哲学系斯拉夫研究所的讲师(2016-2018)。她在保加利亚出版了一本关于范例诗学的理论书籍:《柏拉图和亚里士多德的事件与范例》(2012年)，该书探讨了哲学和理论话语中文学范例与示范作品之间的紧张关系。她在索菲亚高等研究中心(CAS)主持了“作为政治人物的二重身”项目(2014-2015)，这是一个独立的人文社会科学奖学金机构。在她的新书《现代模仿》中。《文学中的自我反思》(2021)，她致力于研究模仿概念在20世纪的转变。

{"title":"Mimetic Machines in the Uncanny Valley","authors":"Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, K. Spassova","doi":"10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.482","url":null,"abstract":"Uncanny valley (不気味の谷 ) is a notion introduced by the Japanese robotics professor Masahiro Mori in 1970. The basic claim of his hypothesis states that the anthropomorphic machines cause uncanny effect due to their imperfect resemblance to the human. Humanoids seem almost like people, but exactly the distance of this almost provokes hot debates. There are two trends in robotics, animation, architecture, and computer games. The first trend seeks to overcome the uncanny valley, constructing such an incredible machine that perfectly mimics human actions. The second trend – Masahiro Mori takes this side – consciously constructs non-anthropomorphic machines. The machine’s appearance, structure, shape, proportion of the parts, and motion must be visibly different from the human ones. The term uncanny valley appears in a European context soon after its introduction, due to Jasia Reichardt’s translation in 1978. She is an art critic and curator who is interested in the role of cybernetics in art. The joint between the uncanny valley in robotics and the legacy of Freud and Jentsch is established with this translation at the intersection point between aesthetics and science. This link opens new fields to theoretical and aesthetic imagination.\u0000 \u0000Author(s): Kamelia Spassova\u0000Title (English): Mimetic Machines in the Uncanny Valley\u0000Journal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021).\u0000Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - Skopje\u0000Page Range: 22-33\u0000Page Count: 12\u0000Citation (English): Kamelia Spassova, “Mimetic Machines in the Uncanny Valley,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021): 22-33.\u0000Author Biography\u0000Kamelia Spassova, University of Sofia\u0000Kamelia Spassova is Associate professor at the Literary Theory Department at the University of Sofia, Bulgaria. She is a lecturer at the Slavic Institute, Department of Philosophy, University of Cologne (2016-2018). She has published in Bulgaria a theoretical book on the poetics of example: Event and Example in Plato and Aristotle (2012), which deals with the tension between literary example and exemplary work in philosophical and theoretical discourses. She has developed the project “Doppelganger as a Political Figure” (2014-2015) in the Centre for Advanced Study Sofia (CAS), an independent institution for scholarship in the humanities and social sciences. In her latest book Modern Mimesis. Self-reflexivity in Literature (2021) she works on the transformations of the concept of mimesis in the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":33334,"journal":{"name":"Identities","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78092772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Ways of Unworlding: Against Aesthetic Inferentialism 超脱世界之道:反对审美推理主义

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2021-12-08 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.481

Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, David Roden

I consider and support two claims about aesthetic experience: 1) that it involves encounters with a reality that is not conceptualized via such encounters; 2) that it can generate ruptures in established norms or in the production of shared worlds. This thesis is developed in the teeth of contemporary rationalist inhumanisms that draw on Nelson Goodman’s cognitivist aesthetics and his irrealist account of ‘worldmaking’ to translate the logical insights of inferentialism (or conceptual role semantics) into an aesthetics oriented towards concept-laden practices and their revision through the techniques of experimental art. I employ Derrida’s iterability argument to show that inferentialism presupposes a realist metaphysics that treats repetition and event individuation as independent of constitutive rules, conceptual schemes or ‘world versions’; indicating one way in which aesthetic material remains outside of, even recalcitrant to, the conceptual order. The aesthetic implications of this metaphysics of undecidable events are further explored by considering Jean-Pierre Caron’s recent discussion of Henry Flynt’s idea of ‘constitutive dissociations’ and, finally, the concept as, ambivalently, victim or suicide in the experimental horror of Gary Shipley’s novel Warewolff! and my own Snuff Memories.

我考虑并支持关于审美经验的两个主张:1)它涉及与现实的接触，而这种接触并不是通过这种接触概念化的;2)它可以在既定规范或共享世界的生产中产生断裂。这篇论文是在当代理性主义的非人道主义中发展起来的，它借鉴了纳尔逊·古德曼的认知主义美学和他对“世界制造”的非现实主义描述，将推理主义(或概念角色语义学)的逻辑见解转化为一种面向概念承载实践的美学，并通过实验艺术技术对其进行修正。我使用德里达的可迭代性论证来表明，推理主义预设了一种现实主义形而上学，它将重复和事件个性化视为独立于构成规则、概念方案或“世界版本”;这表明美学材料仍然在概念秩序之外，甚至是抗拒的一种方式。通过考虑让-皮埃尔·卡隆(Jean-Pierre Caron)最近对亨利·弗林特(Henry Flynt)的“构成性分离”(constitutive dissociations)概念的讨论，以及加里·希普利(Gary Shipley)的小说《狼》(Warewolff)的实验恐怖中矛盾的受害者或自杀概念，我们进一步探讨了这种不可确定事件的形而上学的美学含义!还有我自己的鼻烟回忆。

{"title":"Ways of Unworlding: Against Aesthetic Inferentialism","authors":"Identities Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, David Roden","doi":"10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.481","url":null,"abstract":"I consider and support two claims about aesthetic experience: 1) that it involves encounters with a reality that is not conceptualized via such encounters; 2) that it can generate ruptures in established norms or in the production of shared worlds. This thesis is developed in the teeth of contemporary rationalist inhumanisms that draw on Nelson Goodman’s cognitivist aesthetics and his irrealist account of ‘worldmaking’ to translate the logical insights of inferentialism (or conceptual role semantics) into an aesthetics oriented towards concept-laden practices and their revision through the techniques of experimental art. I employ Derrida’s iterability argument to show that inferentialism presupposes a realist metaphysics that treats repetition and event individuation as independent of constitutive rules, conceptual schemes or ‘world versions’; indicating one way in which aesthetic material remains outside of, even recalcitrant to, the conceptual order. The aesthetic implications of this metaphysics of undecidable events are further explored by considering Jean-Pierre Caron’s recent discussion of Henry Flynt’s idea of ‘constitutive dissociations’ and, finally, the concept as, ambivalently, victim or suicide in the experimental horror of Gary Shipley’s novel Warewolff! and my own Snuff Memories.","PeriodicalId":33334,"journal":{"name":"Identities","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85884414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Neda Genova in Conversation with Mijke van der Drift: A Conversation on Transfeminism as Anti-Colonial Politics 内达·热那亚与Mijke van der Drift的对话:跨性别女性主义作为反殖民政治的对话

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v17i2-3.453

N. Genova, Mijke van der Drift

For this piece we were provoked by an anti-trans moment that took place during the School of Politics and Critique in September 2020. Instead of engaging in a mere “rebuttal” of anti-trans discourse and its reductive, exclusionary claims, with this text we aim to open up a space of exchange and learning that takes the form of a feminist conversation. We discuss the historical and political entrenchment of colonial, capitalist and anti-trans projects to emphasise why a solid trans politics will always hold an anti-colonial agenda to the fore. Critically appraising some unfortunate intellectual and political impasses—as the capturing of feminist politics in schemata of biological determinism or the complicity of white bourgeois feminism in anti-Blackness and colonial exploitation—we shed light on the emancipatory potential of radical transfeminism. The conversation draws on lessons from the writings and practice of many engaged in formulating the stakes of black feminist, anti-colonial and trans politics of solidarity, thus actualizing the insight that we never think or act in isolation from one another. Author(s): Neda Genova and Mijke van der DriftTitle (English): Neda Genova in Conversation with Mijke van der Drift: A Conversation on Transfeminism as Anti-Colonial PoliticsJournal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 2-3 (Winter 2020)Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - SkopjePage Range: 102-108Page Count: 7Citation (English): Neda Genova and Mijke van der Drift, “Neda Genova in Conversation with Mijke van der Drift: A Conversation on Transfeminism as Anti-Colonial Politics,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 2-3 (Winter 2020): 102-108.Author BiographiesMijke van der Drift, Royal College of Art/University of Cambridge Philosopher and educator Mijke van der Drift works on ethics as a focal point in a multi-disciplinary research about social transformation. Van der Drift is tutor at the Royal College of Art, London and the Royal Academy of Art, the Hague. They are a Research Associate at the University of Cambridge in 2020-21, as part of the Revolutionary Papers project, in collaboration with the London School of Economics and the University of the Western Cape. In addition, van der Drift is currently working on their book Non normative Ethics: The Dynamics of Trans Formation. They obtained a Ph.D. from Goldsmiths, University of London. Their current project focuses on multilogical ethics and generosity, and is provisionally titled The Logic of Loss in Bonding. The book chapter “Radical Transfeminism: Trans as Anti-Static Ethics Escaping Neoliberal Encapsulation” co-written with Nat Raha is recently published in New Feminist Studies: Twenty-first-century Critical Interventions, ed. Jennifer Cooke, with Cambridge University Press.Neda Genova, London Bank University/GoldsmithsNeda Genova teaches at Goldsmiths University of London and London South

在这篇文章中，我们受到了2020年9月在政治与批判学院发生的反跨性别时刻的启发。与其仅仅“反驳”反跨性别话语及其简化、排他性的主张，我们的目标是通过这篇文章开辟一个以女权主义对话的形式进行交流和学习的空间。我们讨论了殖民主义、资本主义和反跨性别项目的历史和政治防御，以强调为什么一个坚实的跨性别政治将始终把反殖民议程放在首位。批判性地评价一些不幸的知识和政治僵局——如在生物决定论的图式中捕捉女权主义政治，或白人资产阶级女权主义在反黑人和殖民剥削中的共谋——我们揭示了激进的跨女权主义的解放潜力。对话借鉴了许多参与制定黑人女权主义、反殖民主义和跨性别团结政治利害关系的人的著作和实践中的经验教训，从而实现了我们从不孤立地思考或行动的洞察力。作者(s): Neda Genova和Mijke van der Drift标题(英文):Neda Genova在与Mijke van der Drift的对话:关于跨女权主义作为反殖民政治的对话期刊参考文献:身份:政治，性别和文化杂志，卷17,No. 2-3(冬季2020)出版商:社会科学与人文研究所- skopjpage范围:102-108页数:7引文(英文):Neda Genova和Mijke van der Drift，“Neda Genova在与Mijke van der Drift的对话中:跨性别女性主义作为反殖民政治的对话，”身份:政治，性别与文化杂志，Vol. 17, No. 2-3(冬季2020):102-108。作者简介Mijke van der Drift，皇家艺术学院/剑桥大学哲学家和教育家Mijke van der Drift致力于将伦理学作为社会转型多学科研究的焦点。Van der Drift是伦敦皇家艺术学院和海牙皇家艺术学院的导师。作为“革命论文”项目的一部分，他们将于2020-21年在剑桥大学与伦敦经济学院和西开普大学合作，担任研究助理。此外，van der Drift目前正在撰写他们的著作《非规范性伦理:转型的动力》。他们获得了伦敦大学金匠学院的博士学位。他们目前的项目专注于多元逻辑伦理和慷慨，并暂时命名为“纽带中损失的逻辑”。与纳特·拉哈合著的“激进的跨女权主义:反静态伦理逃避新自由主义的封装”一章最近在剑桥大学出版社詹妮弗·库克主编的《新女权主义研究:二十一世纪批判性干预》中发表。Neda Genova任教于伦敦金史密斯大学和伦敦南岸大学，拥有金史密斯大学文化研究博士学位。她的研究处于后共产主义研究与媒体和文化理论的交叉点。她对女权主义和后殖民理论、幽默和笑声的政治以及后共产主义数字文化感兴趣。她是保加利亚语活动家学术杂志dVERSIA (dВЕРСИЯ)的编辑小组成员。

{"title":"Neda Genova in Conversation with Mijke van der Drift: A Conversation on Transfeminism as Anti-Colonial Politics","authors":"N. Genova, Mijke van der Drift","doi":"10.51151/identities.v17i2-3.453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v17i2-3.453","url":null,"abstract":"For this piece we were provoked by an anti-trans moment that took place during the School of Politics and Critique in September 2020. Instead of engaging in a mere “rebuttal” of anti-trans discourse and its reductive, exclusionary claims, with this text we aim to open up a space of exchange and learning that takes the form of a feminist conversation. We discuss the historical and political entrenchment of colonial, capitalist and anti-trans projects to emphasise why a solid trans politics will always hold an anti-colonial agenda to the fore. Critically appraising some unfortunate intellectual and political impasses—as the capturing of feminist politics in schemata of biological determinism or the complicity of white bourgeois feminism in anti-Blackness and colonial exploitation—we shed light on the emancipatory potential of radical transfeminism. The conversation draws on lessons from the writings and practice of many engaged in formulating the stakes of black feminist, anti-colonial and trans politics of solidarity, thus actualizing the insight that we never think or act in isolation from one another. \u0000Author(s): Neda Genova and Mijke van der Drift\u0000Title (English): Neda Genova in Conversation with Mijke van der Drift: A Conversation on Transfeminism as Anti-Colonial Politics\u0000Journal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 2-3 (Winter 2020)\u0000Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - Skopje\u0000Page Range: 102-108\u0000Page Count: 7\u0000Citation (English): Neda Genova and Mijke van der Drift, “Neda Genova in Conversation with Mijke van der Drift: A Conversation on Transfeminism as Anti-Colonial Politics,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 2-3 (Winter 2020): 102-108.\u0000Author Biographies\u0000Mijke van der Drift, Royal College of Art/University of Cambridge \u0000Philosopher and educator Mijke van der Drift works on ethics as a focal point in a multi-disciplinary research about social transformation. Van der Drift is tutor at the Royal College of Art, London and the Royal Academy of Art, the Hague. They are a Research Associate at the University of Cambridge in 2020-21, as part of the Revolutionary Papers project, in collaboration with the London School of Economics and the University of the Western Cape. In addition, van der Drift is currently working on their book Non normative Ethics: The Dynamics of Trans Formation. They obtained a Ph.D. from Goldsmiths, University of London. Their current project focuses on multilogical ethics and generosity, and is provisionally titled The Logic of Loss in Bonding. The book chapter “Radical Transfeminism: Trans as Anti-Static Ethics Escaping Neoliberal Encapsulation” co-written with Nat Raha is recently published in New Feminist Studies: Twenty-first-century Critical Interventions, ed. Jennifer Cooke, with Cambridge University Press.\u0000Neda Genova, London Bank University/Goldsmiths\u0000Neda Genova teaches at Goldsmiths University of London and London South","PeriodicalId":33334,"journal":{"name":"Identities","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87101051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Q&A Session Following the Lecture: Materialist Feminism and Radical Feminism: Revisiting the Second Wave in the Light of Recent Controversies 讲座后的问答环节:唯物主义女权主义与激进女权主义:从最近的争议重新审视第二次浪潮

Q1 Social Sciences

Identities

Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI: 10.51151/identities.v17i2-3.469

Nina Power et al.

Author(s): Nina Power et al.Title (English): Q&A session following the lecture: Materialist Feminism and Radical Feminism: Revisiting the Second Wave in the Light of Recent ControversiesJournal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 2-3 (Winter 2020)Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - SkopjePage Range: 36-39Page Count: 4Citation (English): Nina Power et al., “Q&A session following the lecture: Materialist Feminism and Radical Feminism: Revisiting the Second Wave in the Light of Recent Controversies,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 2-3 (Winter 2020): 36-39.Author BiographyNina Power, Independent ResearcherNina Power is a philosopher and writer, and the author of many articles on politics, feminism and culture. She is the author of One-Dimensional Woman (2009) and the forthcoming What Do Men Want? (2021). She is currently teaching at Mary Ward and has previously taught at the University of Roehampton and many other institutions.

作者:Nina Power et al.标题(英文):讲座后问答:唯物主义女权主义和激进女权主义:在最近争议的光中重新审视第二波期刊参考文献:身份:政治，性别与文化杂志，第17卷，第2-3期(2020年冬季)出版商:社会科学与人文研究所- skopjpage范围:36-39页数:4引文(英文):Nina Power et al.，“讲座后问答:唯物主义女权主义和激进女权主义;《从近期争议重新审视第二次浪潮》，《身份:政治、性别与文化》，第17卷，第2-3期(2020年冬季):36-39。尼娜·鲍尔，独立研究员尼娜·鲍尔是一位哲学家和作家，在政治、女权主义和文化方面发表了许多文章。她是《一维女人》(2009)和即将出版的《男人想要什么?》(2021)。她目前在玛丽沃德学院任教，之前曾在罗汉普顿大学和许多其他机构任教。

引用次数: 0