Earth System Governance最新文献

英文中文

Exploring ‘planetary health’ in the context of Earth System Governance: Editorial 在地球系统治理的背景下探索“行星健康”：编辑

IF 4.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100257

Annabelle Workman , Kathryn J. Bowen

引用次数: 0

Analysis of international climate change governance for the agriculture, forest and land use sector: Gaps and recommendations for future improvement 农业、森林和土地利用部门国际气候变化治理分析：差距和未来改进建议

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-07-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100278

María Jose Sanz , Ana Karla Perea Blazquez

The crucial role of land-based activities in climate change mitigation and adaptation has gained recognition under the Paris Agreement, including through the commitments outlined in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). While technical assessments highlight the mitigation potential of the land sector, this potential is constrained by several challenges, particularly competing demands across development, social, environmental and climate objectives. International governance structures for land use often fail to address these multiple objectives, which makes it challenging to ensure sound arbitrages among them. This paper evaluates the current international governance landscape in the Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector, analysing governance functions that address barriers to climate change mitigation globally and assessing the extent to which these functions are met. Our findings indicate that while existing governance frameworks address barriers through guidance, rule-setting, transparency and accountability, support for implementation, and knowledge dissemination, gaps remain, particularly in guidance and signalling, transparency and rules and standards. Other key gaps identified are the insufficiency of the funds mobilised so far, the limitations of global assessments, and the duplicity of efforts and disconnection across different initiatives. Closing these governance gaps is essential to enable effective global governance in the AFOLU sector and unlock its mitigation potential. We propose potential solutions to bridge these gaps.

陆地活动在减缓和适应气候变化方面的关键作用已得到《巴黎协定》的承认，包括在国家自主贡献中概述的承诺。虽然技术评估强调了土地部门的缓解潜力，但这种潜力受到若干挑战的制约，特别是发展、社会、环境和气候目标之间相互竞争的需求。土地使用的国际治理结构往往不能解决这些多重目标，这使得确保它们之间的合理套利具有挑战性。本文评估了当前农业、林业和其他土地利用（AFOLU）部门的国际治理格局，分析了解决全球减缓气候变化障碍的治理功能，并评估了这些功能得到满足的程度。我们的研究结果表明，虽然现有的治理框架通过指导、规则制定、透明度和问责制、支持实施和知识传播来解决障碍，但差距仍然存在，特别是在指导和信号、透明度以及规则和标准方面。确定的其他主要差距是迄今为止筹集的资金不足，全球评估的局限性，以及不同举措之间的工作表里不一和脱节。缩小这些治理差距对于实现AFOLU部门的有效全球治理并释放其缓解潜力至关重要。我们提出了弥合这些差距的潜在解决方案。

{"title":"Analysis of international climate change governance for the agriculture, forest and land use sector: Gaps and recommendations for future improvement","authors":"María Jose Sanz , Ana Karla Perea Blazquez","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100278","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100278","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The crucial role of land-based activities in climate change mitigation and adaptation has gained recognition under the Paris Agreement, including through the commitments outlined in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). While technical assessments highlight the mitigation potential of the land sector, this potential is constrained by several challenges, particularly competing demands across development, social, environmental and climate objectives. International governance structures for land use often fail to address these multiple objectives, which makes it challenging to ensure sound arbitrages among them. This paper evaluates the current international governance landscape in the Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector, analysing governance functions that address barriers to climate change mitigation globally and assessing the extent to which these functions are met. Our findings indicate that while existing governance frameworks address barriers through guidance, rule-setting, transparency and accountability, support for implementation, and knowledge dissemination, gaps remain, particularly in guidance and signalling, transparency and rules and standards. Other key gaps identified are the insufficiency of the funds mobilised so far, the limitations of global assessments, and the duplicity of efforts and disconnection across different initiatives. Closing these governance gaps is essential to enable effective global governance in the AFOLU sector and unlock its mitigation potential. We propose potential solutions to bridge these gaps.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100278"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144704848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Leave no one behind: Prioritising equality and equity towards integration of global sustainability governance 不让任何一个人掉队：优先考虑平等和公平，推动全球可持续治理一体化

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100277

Lisa Hiwasaki

Processes within global sustainability governance are fragmented despite calls for greater synergies. Although “leave no one behind” is a universal value of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, evidence of concrete efforts to decrease inequalities, especially between countries in the Global South and North, are limited. In order to understand the impacts of fragmented global sustainability governance on inequality reduction and equitable development, I conducted text analysis of the 2030 Agenda's Sustainable Development Goals, the Paris Agreement on climate change, and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, and reviewed literature on the convergences and gaps among them. I found that first, although the three global agreements acknowledge the need to realise equality and equity, the use of these terms are sparing in the texts, and when they do appear, they are defined inconsistently and operationalized imprecisely across these global processes. Second, while numerous linkages exist among the three agreements, sustainability challenges that directly relate to equality and equity outcomes are the ones with the least convergences identified, and have the least number of activities implemented, research done, and data collected. Such fragmented and inconsistent implementation and monitoring of progress towards sustainable development are detrimental to equitable development, and negatively affect marginalised groups—especially in the Global South—for whom impacts of disasters, climate change, and maldevelopment are felt most acutely. At more than halfway in the implementation of these global processes, it is important now more than ever to strengthen efforts towards their integration by prioritising equality and equity.

尽管呼吁加强协同作用，但全球可持续性治理内部的进程是分散的。尽管“不让任何一个人掉队”是《2030年可持续发展议程》的普遍价值，但为减少不平等现象，特别是全球南北国家之间的不平等现象作出具体努力的证据有限。为了了解碎片化的全球可持续治理对减少不平等和公平发展的影响，我对《2030年可持续发展议程》、《气候变化巴黎协定》和《仙台减少灾害风险框架》进行了文本分析，并对它们之间的趋同和差距进行了文献回顾。首先，我发现，虽然这三个全球协议承认有必要实现平等和公平，但这些术语在文本中很少使用，而且当它们出现时，它们在这些全球进程中的定义不一致，操作也不精确。其次，虽然三个协定之间存在许多联系，但与平等和公平结果直接相关的可持续性挑战是发现的趋同程度最低的挑战，并且实施的活动、完成的研究和收集的数据数量最少。这种对可持续发展进展的分散和不一致的实施和监测不利于公平发展，并对边缘化群体产生负面影响，特别是在全球南方，对他们来说，灾害、气候变化和发展不良的影响最为严重。在这些全球进程的执行已进行了一半以上的时候，现在比以往任何时候都更重要的是通过优先考虑平等和公平来加强努力，实现这些进程的一体化。

{"title":"Leave no one behind: Prioritising equality and equity towards integration of global sustainability governance","authors":"Lisa Hiwasaki","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100277","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100277","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Processes within global sustainability governance are fragmented despite calls for greater synergies. Although “leave no one behind” is a universal value of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, evidence of concrete efforts to decrease inequalities, especially between countries in the Global South and North, are limited. In order to understand the impacts of fragmented global sustainability governance on inequality reduction and equitable development, I conducted text analysis of the 2030 Agenda's Sustainable Development Goals, the Paris Agreement on climate change, and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, and reviewed literature on the convergences and gaps among them. I found that first, although the three global agreements acknowledge the need to realise equality and equity, the use of these terms are sparing in the texts, and when they do appear, they are defined inconsistently and operationalized imprecisely across these global processes. Second, while numerous linkages exist among the three agreements, sustainability challenges that directly relate to equality and equity outcomes are the ones with the least convergences identified, and have the least number of activities implemented, research done, and data collected. Such fragmented and inconsistent implementation and monitoring of progress towards sustainable development are detrimental to equitable development, and negatively affect marginalised groups—especially in the Global South—for whom impacts of disasters, climate change, and maldevelopment are felt most acutely. At more than halfway in the implementation of these global processes, it is important now more than ever to strengthen efforts towards their integration by prioritising equality and equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144685967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Climate change framings and linkages across international organizations 气候变化框架和跨国际组织的联系

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100279

Karina Shyrokykh, Lisa Dellmuth

As climate change is becoming an ever more pressing global policy challenge, the linkages of climate change to other issue areas are diversifying. This article seeks to explain why some climate linkages are more likely to spread across international organizations (IOs) than others. Drawing on organizational and framing theories, we argue that the framing of climate linkages affects how such linkages disseminate across IOs. Distinguishing between three framings of climate change––technical, emotional and emergency––we develop and test novel hypotheses about the effects of framing climate linkages on their spread on social media. We use an original dataset on the dissemination of climate linkages on the social media platform Twitter (currently X) among eight IOs with a global mandate during the period 2008–2019. The results suggest that both the characteristics and the framing of climate linkages influence their spread across the studied IOs, as we find, in the context of the climate-development and climate-disaster risks linkages, that technical and emotional framings affect how linkages spread across several United Nations agencies. In all, we show the importance of the interplay between climate change linkages and the framings of these linkages for their spread across IOs.

随着气候变化成为一项日益紧迫的全球政策挑战，气候变化与其他问题领域的联系正在多样化。本文试图解释为什么一些气候联系比其他气候联系更有可能在国际组织中传播。根据组织和框架理论，我们认为气候联系的框架会影响这种联系在各生态系统之间的传播方式。通过区分气候变化的三种框架——技术框架、情感框架和紧急框架，我们提出并检验了关于气候联系框架对其在社交媒体上传播的影响的新假设。我们使用了2008-2019年期间在社交媒体平台Twitter（目前为X）上对八个具有全球任务的IOs进行气候联系传播的原始数据集。结果表明，气候联系的特征和框架都会影响其在所研究的国际组织中的传播，正如我们发现的那样，在气候发展和气候灾害风险联系的背景下，技术和情感框架会影响联系如何在几个联合国机构中传播。总之，我们展示了气候变化联系和这些联系的框架之间的相互作用对于它们在国际间传播的重要性。

{"title":"Climate change framings and linkages across international organizations","authors":"Karina Shyrokykh, Lisa Dellmuth","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100279","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100279","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As climate change is becoming an ever more pressing global policy challenge, the linkages of climate change to other issue areas are diversifying. This article seeks to explain why some climate linkages are more likely to spread across international organizations (IOs) than others. Drawing on organizational and framing theories, we argue that the framing of climate linkages affects how such linkages disseminate across IOs. Distinguishing between three framings of climate change––technical, emotional and emergency––we develop and test novel hypotheses about the effects of framing climate linkages on their spread on social media. We use an original dataset on the dissemination of climate linkages on the social media platform Twitter (currently X) among eight IOs with a global mandate during the period 2008–2019. The results suggest that both the characteristics and the framing of climate linkages influence their spread across the studied IOs, as we find, in the context of the climate-development and climate-disaster risks linkages, that technical and emotional framings affect how linkages spread across several United Nations agencies. In all, we show the importance of the interplay between climate change linkages and the framings of these linkages for their spread across IOs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100279"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144685968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Securitization, three streams model and biodiversity in the Global South: A case study of Western Ghats of India 证券化、三流模式与全球南方的生物多样性——以印度西高止山脉为例

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100268

Justin Joseph , Anjan Kumar Sahu , Juha Vuori

Biodiversity conservation is one of the most contentious issues in the Global South, particularly political authority's methods and objectives of managing conservation. This paper studies how political authority deals with biodiversity conservation, and how different stakeholders respond to the conservation policy. In doing so, the study employs the securitization framework and blends it with the Three Streams Model to find out the political authority's securitization process (which is state-driven and top-down). Additionally, Narrative Policy Framework is employed to study the response of stakeholders (primarily local) to the securitization process. Thus, the central objective of the paper is to examine the securitization of the Western Ghats, especially with reference to Kerala, India. Based on the case study, the study finds that audiences in the Global South are capable of opposing securitization of biodiversity. In conjunction with functional actors, audience form assemblages and resist the deployment of extraordinary measures, thereby opposing securitization.

生物多样性保护是全球发展中国家最具争议的问题之一，特别是政治当局管理保护的方法和目标。本文研究了政治权威如何处理生物多样性保护问题，以及不同利益相关者对保护政策的反应。在此过程中，本研究采用证券化框架，并将其与三流模型相结合，以找出政治当局的证券化过程（国家驱动和自上而下）。此外，叙述性政策框架被用来研究利益相关者（主要是地方）对证券化过程的反应。因此，本文的中心目标是研究西高止山脉的证券化，特别是参考印度喀拉拉邦。基于案例研究，研究发现全球南方的受众具有反对生物多样性证券化的能力。与功能参与者一起，受众形成集合并抵制非常规措施的部署，从而反对证券化。

引用次数: 0

Land-use governance: The interplay of social, market, and policy drivers – A global systematic review 土地使用治理：社会、市场和政策驱动因素的相互作用——全球系统回顾

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100275

Elsa L. Dingkuhn , Lilian O'Sullivan , Caitlin A. Grady , Erik de Klerk , Rogier P.O. Schulte

Sustainable land-use governance is challenged by the complex interplay of local to global influences. This study combines two complementary approaches: a systematic review compiling a database of direct and diffuse contextual land-use drivers; and a cross-case analysis of three contrasting contexts: Ireland (regulated EU), Pennsylvania (market-driven US), and the Philippines (emerging economy) to uncover systemic interactions between drivers within and across cases.

Among direct drivers, regulatory approaches had the greatest impact, especially when synergistically combined with softer instruments. Market drivers highlight the need to engage supply-chain actors beyond farmers. Contextual factors outweighed direct drivers: farmers’ choices remain rooted in social contexts on which governance instruments depend for their effectiveness.

We demonstrate the need for greater policy coherence by addressing conflicting influences that hinder policy objectives, integrating socio-cultural and structural factors, and prioritising context-sensitive approaches. Amidst escalating ecological pressures, we provide recommendations and common governance principles applicable across diverse institutional settings.

可持续土地利用治理受到地方与全球影响的复杂相互作用的挑战。这项研究结合了两种互补的方法：系统审查汇编直接和扩散背景土地利用驱动因素数据库；并对三个对比背景进行跨案例分析：爱尔兰（受监管的欧盟）、宾夕法尼亚州（市场驱动的美国）和菲律宾（新兴经济体），以揭示案例内部和案例之间驱动因素之间的系统性相互作用。在直接驱动因素中，监管方法的影响最大，特别是当与较软手段协同结合时。市场驱动因素强调需要让农民以外的供应链参与者参与进来。背景因素超过了直接驱动因素：农民的选择仍然植根于社会背景，治理工具的有效性取决于社会背景。我们通过解决阻碍政策目标的相互冲突的影响，整合社会文化和结构因素，以及优先考虑对具体情况敏感的方法，证明了加强政策一致性的必要性。在不断升级的生态压力下，我们提供了适用于不同机构设置的建议和共同治理原则。

{"title":"Land-use governance: The interplay of social, market, and policy drivers – A global systematic review","authors":"Elsa L. Dingkuhn , Lilian O'Sullivan , Caitlin A. Grady , Erik de Klerk , Rogier P.O. Schulte","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100275","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100275","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainable land-use governance is challenged by the complex interplay of local to global influences. This study combines two complementary approaches: a systematic review compiling a database of direct and diffuse contextual land-use drivers; and a cross-case analysis of three contrasting contexts: Ireland (regulated EU), Pennsylvania (market-driven US), and the Philippines (emerging economy) to uncover systemic interactions between drivers within and across cases.</div><div>Among direct drivers, regulatory approaches had the greatest impact, especially when synergistically combined with softer instruments. Market drivers highlight the need to engage supply-chain actors beyond farmers. Contextual factors outweighed direct drivers: farmers’ choices remain rooted in social contexts on which governance instruments depend for their effectiveness.</div><div>We demonstrate the need for greater policy coherence by addressing conflicting influences that hinder policy objectives, integrating socio-cultural and structural factors, and prioritising context-sensitive approaches. Amidst escalating ecological pressures, we provide recommendations and common governance principles applicable across diverse institutional settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100275"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144633033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Cyber-governance of the natural world the implications of digital twins in environmental governance 自然世界的网络治理：数字孪生对环境治理的影响

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100276

Paulan Korenhof , Brett Metcalfe , Adam Henschke

Digital Twins (DTs) are data-driven real-time and multi-faceted representations of real-life physical systems or phenomena. Currently, DTs are developed for use in environmental governance, ranging from DTs of single crops to the planet Earth. By offering up-to-date dynamic simulations, DTs are anticipated to support decision-making in addressing key challenges like ecological degradation and climate change. However, DTs are not neutral tools: they are shaped by human assumptions and values, and bring about changes and power shifts in decision-making processes.

In this article, we take in a bird's eye view to identify the different levels and manners in which DTs can reconfigure environmental governance. Building on Korenhof et al. (2021), we conceptualise DTs as cybernetic systems. We trace how these systems affect governance on the levels of information, communication, and control. We conclude that, when used in environmental governance, it is vital to take action to ensure the democratic legitimacy of DTs.

数字孪生（DTs）是数据驱动的现实物理系统或现象的实时和多面表示。目前，开发了用于环境治理的滴滴涕，从单一作物的滴滴涕到整个地球。通过提供最新的动态模拟，DTs有望支持应对生态退化和气候变化等关键挑战的决策。然而，技术转移并不是中立的工具：它们受到人类假设和价值观的影响，并在决策过程中带来变化和权力转移。在本文中，我们将以鸟瞰的视角来确定dt可以重新配置环境治理的不同级别和方式。在Korenhof等人（2021）的基础上，我们将dt概念化为控制论系统。我们跟踪这些系统如何影响信息、通信和控制级别上的治理。我们的结论是，在环境治理中使用DTs时，采取行动确保DTs的民主合法性至关重要。

引用次数: 0

The just energy transition partnership in South Africa: Identification and assessment of key factors driving international cooperation 南非公正的能源转型伙伴关系：确定和评估推动国际合作的关键因素

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-07-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100274

Heiner von Lüpke

This paper investigates the implications of implementing the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) in South Africa by exploring the factors that are at work when donors and recipients interact with each other. It analyses the JETP using global cooperation theories on climate change and identify mutual trust, based on shared norms; and process legitimacy via institutionalisation as the factors which can promote cooperation between donors and recipients. The paper contributes to the literature on international climate finance by providing novel insights through the analysis of the South African JETP as a single case study. It shows that the JETP is in fact a transnational policy process that needs to be institutionalised and legitimised to improve shortcomings of established conditionality instruments. The results might also inform the design of other climate and development partnerships in sectors such as land use or industry, as challenges of transitions appear similar.

本文通过探讨捐助方和受援方相互作用时起作用的因素，调查了在南非实施公正能源转型伙伴关系（JETP）的影响。运用气候变化全球合作理论对JETP进行了分析，确定了基于共同规范的相互信任；并通过制度化来处理合法性，作为促进捐助者和受援国之间合作的因素。本文通过对南非JETP作为单一案例的分析，提供了新颖的见解，从而为国际气候融资文献做出了贡献。它表明，JETP实际上是一个跨国政策进程，需要制度化和合法化，以改善既定条件文书的缺点。研究结果也可能为土地利用或工业等部门的其他气候和发展伙伴关系的设计提供参考，因为转型的挑战似乎类似。

引用次数: 0

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100273

Christian Winkler

引用次数: 0

International cooperation in times of polycrisis: Patchworks as pathways in earth system governance 多重危机时期的国际合作：拼凑作为地球系统治理的途径

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Earth System Governance

Pub Date : 2025-06-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100271

Jochen Prantl, Giridharan Ramasubramanian

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Earth System Governance

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀