Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.18523/2617-2607.2018.68-73
V. Kostiuk
The article reveals the issues related to the legal characteristic of European social standards and their impact on the development of the latest model of sources of social security law. It is noted that the European model of social security (protection) is characterized by such features as promoting the development of an inclusive society; implying the responsibility of society and the state for effective social policy; availability of an effective and accessible system of social rights; aiming at forming a high level of social standards, guarantees, as well as the quality of life of a person; sufficiency, efficiency, accessibility of organizational forms and types of social security (protection); availability of effective and flexible legal regulation in the field of social security (protection). The emphasis is on the fact that European social standards should be considered broadly and narrowly. Broadly speaking, European social standards are a set of norms, provisions, and standards of a conceptual nature, contained in international legal acts approved by authorized European institutions and aimed at developing an effective model of social security (protection). In the narrow sense, European social standards are a set of recognized and enshrined in accordance with international legal acts adopted by authorized European institutions of social human rights. The basic features of European social standards are the following: they are the result of the normative activity of authorized European institutions (the Council of Europe, the EU); enshrined in international legal acts of the Council of Europe and the EU; include a system of rules, regulations, and standards for social security; include a system of fundamental social rights; act as a legal basis for the development of social legislation of individual member states of the Council of Europe and the EU; act as a legal basis for the formation of a new system of sources of social security law. The key role of the European Social Charter (revised) and the European Code of Social Security in shaping European social standards is noted, with emphasizing the need to take into account European social standards when formulating a system of sources of social security law, and in particular, in the process of codification of legislation in this area. The basic trends of development of the latest model of sources of social security law are emphasized. It is concluded that the main tendencies of the formation of a modern system of sources of social security law through the prism of European social standards are the following: development and implementation of the National Strategy for Social Reforms and Development of the Law on Social Security; formation of the National Concept for the Implementation of European Social Standards; introduction of the European and scientific socio-legal expertise of draft legal acts on social security; enhancing the effectiveness and accessibility of implementation mechanis
{"title":"Європейські соціальні стандарти в контексті сучасної моделі джерел права соціального забезпечення: науково-теоретичний аспект","authors":"V. Kostiuk","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2018.68-73","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.68-73","url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the issues related to the legal characteristic of European social standards and their impact on the development of the latest model of sources of social security law. It is noted that the European model of social security (protection) is characterized by such features as promoting the development of an inclusive society; implying the responsibility of society and the state for effective social policy; availability of an effective and accessible system of social rights; aiming at forming a high level of social standards, guarantees, as well as the quality of life of a person; sufficiency, efficiency, accessibility of organizational forms and types of social security (protection); availability of effective and flexible legal regulation in the field of social security (protection). The emphasis is on the fact that European social standards should be considered broadly and narrowly. Broadly speaking, European social standards are a set of norms, provisions, and standards of a conceptual nature, contained in international legal acts approved by authorized European institutions and aimed at developing an effective model of social security (protection). In the narrow sense, European social standards are a set of recognized and enshrined in accordance with international legal acts adopted by authorized European institutions of social human rights. The basic features of European social standards are the following: they are the result of the normative activity of authorized European institutions (the Council of Europe, the EU); enshrined in international legal acts of the Council of Europe and the EU; include a system of rules, regulations, and standards for social security; include a system of fundamental social rights; act as a legal basis for the development of social legislation of individual member states of the Council of Europe and the EU; act as a legal basis for the formation of a new system of sources of social security law. The key role of the European Social Charter (revised) and the European Code of Social Security in shaping European social standards is noted, with emphasizing the need to take into account European social standards when formulating a system of sources of social security law, and in particular, in the process of codification of legislation in this area. The basic trends of development of the latest model of sources of social security law are emphasized. It is concluded that the main tendencies of the formation of a modern system of sources of social security law through the prism of European social standards are the following: development and implementation of the National Strategy for Social Reforms and Development of the Law on Social Security; formation of the National Concept for the Implementation of European Social Standards; introduction of the European and scientific socio-legal expertise of draft legal acts on social security; enhancing the effectiveness and accessibility of implementation mechanis","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68266903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.18523/2617-2607.2018.55-61
I. Izarova
The aim of this article is to study the notion of “common minimum standards of the civil procedure” proposed by the European Parliament in Resolution of July 4, 2017 (2015/2084 (INL)) with recommendations to the Commission on common minimum standards of the civil procedure in the European Union. It allows a further development and convergence of the civil procedure in the EU and the world – in the light of the Project on European rules of the civil procedure of ELI-Unidroit, ALI-Unidroit Transnational Principles of Civil Procedure, and M. Storm’s Final Report “Approximation of Judiciary Law in the EU”. Trends in the convergence of the civil procedure and overcoming the differences existing in the national legislation of Member States are significant not only for the EU. The reform of the judiciary and civil procedure in Ukraine is aimed at increasing the level of protection of the rights and freedoms and the implementation of the European and worldwide standards of civil justice. The resolution adopted by European Parliament refers to common minimum standards for the civil procedure, and this is the first time when the term was proposed at the level of the EU law, although the approximation of the civil procedural law has been considered for quite a long time. Therefore, the article proposes approaches to the definition of these standards. The main task of the implementation of the common minimum standards of the civil procedure is to ensure the rights of the citizens by establishing minimum standards for the opening, preparation, and resolution of civil cases in the courts of the Member States, which will provide a really new stage in the harmonization of this branch of law and reflect the general desire of the community to define common approaches to the basic provisions of the civil procedure. Accordingly, the article focused on the study of the proposed common minimum standards of the civil procedure by comparing it with the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine of 2017. Among them are the standards of providing funds, procedures, and measures for effective judicial protection, requirements for hearings, the use of temporary and other security measures, the efficiency of the procedure, the motivation of decisions, general principles of the case management, the order of providing evidence, involvement of experts, legal aid, as well as requirements to prevent abuse of funding by which a person goes to court. Also the approximation of the provisions on the procedure for the services of documents, the provision of the right to have a lawyer in a civil procedure, access to information, interpretation and translation of the documents, determination of the responsibilities of parties and their representatives, requirements for a public trial, ensuring independence, and impartiality of the judges. Article received 16.04.2018
{"title":"Спільні стандарти цивільного процесу в ЄС: загальна характеристика та перспективи реалізації","authors":"I. Izarova","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2018.55-61","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.55-61","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to study the notion of “common minimum standards of the civil procedure” proposed by the European Parliament in Resolution of July 4, 2017 (2015/2084 (INL)) with recommendations to the Commission on common minimum standards of the civil procedure in the European Union. It allows a further development and convergence of the civil procedure in the EU and the world – in the light of the Project on European rules of the civil procedure of ELI-Unidroit, ALI-Unidroit Transnational Principles of Civil Procedure, and M. Storm’s Final Report “Approximation of Judiciary Law in the EU”. Trends in the convergence of the civil procedure and overcoming the differences existing in the national legislation of Member States are significant not only for the EU. The reform of the judiciary and civil procedure in Ukraine is aimed at increasing the level of protection of the rights and freedoms and the implementation of the European and worldwide standards of civil justice. The resolution adopted by European Parliament refers to common minimum standards for the civil procedure, and this is the first time when the term was proposed at the level of the EU law, although the approximation of the civil procedural law has been considered for quite a long time. Therefore, the article proposes approaches to the definition of these standards. The main task of the implementation of the common minimum standards of the civil procedure is to ensure the rights of the citizens by establishing minimum standards for the opening, preparation, and resolution of civil cases in the courts of the Member States, which will provide a really new stage in the harmonization of this branch of law and reflect the general desire of the community to define common approaches to the basic provisions of the civil procedure. Accordingly, the article focused on the study of the proposed common minimum standards of the civil procedure by comparing it with the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine of 2017. Among them are the standards of providing funds, procedures, and measures for effective judicial protection, requirements for hearings, the use of temporary and other security measures, the efficiency of the procedure, the motivation of decisions, general principles of the case management, the order of providing evidence, involvement of experts, legal aid, as well as requirements to prevent abuse of funding by which a person goes to court. Also the approximation of the provisions on the procedure for the services of documents, the provision of the right to have a lawyer in a civil procedure, access to information, interpretation and translation of the documents, determination of the responsibilities of parties and their representatives, requirements for a public trial, ensuring independence, and impartiality of the judges. Article received 16.04.2018","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68266653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.18523/2617-2607.2018.3-8
Mykola Koziubra
У статті проаналізовано еволюцію підходів до взаємозв’язків правознавства, науки і методології. У зв’язку з цим простежено етапи розвитку поглядів на науку та її моделі (типи) – класичну, некласичну та посткласичну (постмодерну) – і відповідні їм типи раціональності. Виділено найістотніші методологічні ознаки і новації постнекласичної науки, серед яких особливу увагу звернено на процес «олюднення» науки, посилення її зв’язків з цінностями. Спеціальне місце відведено трансформації критеріїв науковості в постнекласичній моделі науки.
{"title":"Правознавство, наука, методологія: еволюція підходів до їхніх взаємозв’язків","authors":"Mykola Koziubra","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2018.3-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.3-8","url":null,"abstract":"У статті проаналізовано еволюцію підходів до взаємозв’язків правознавства, науки і методології. У зв’язку з цим простежено етапи розвитку поглядів на науку та її моделі (типи) – класичну, некласичну та посткласичну (постмодерну) – і відповідні їм типи раціональності. Виділено найістотніші методологічні ознаки і новації постнекласичної науки, серед яких особливу увагу звернено на процес «олюднення» науки, посилення її зв’язків з цінностями. Спеціальне місце відведено трансформації критеріїв науковості в постнекласичній моделі науки.","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68266293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.18523/2617-2607.2018.50-54
Roksolana Khanyk-Pospolitak
The article addresses the representation in the court, which is one of the main institutions of the Civil Procedural Law. The article analyzes the norms of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine in the wording of 2017 of procedural representation. The genesis of this institute in the Civil Process of Ukraine, starting with the Civil Code of the USSR of 1963, is briefly reviewed. The provisions of procedural representation in different types of proceedings are compared, in particular with economic and administrative ones. On the basis of this it is noted that there was a unification of the rules of representation, which is positive in terms of the practice of applying these provisions of the law. Also the author indicates the terminology and definitions used in this institute as applied in literature and legislation; analyzes the provisions of the Code regarding the types of procedural representation and accordingly indicates that the legislation introduced, along the traditional types of representation (legal and voluntary), another type of representation – self-representation. The article focuses on the possibility of applying procedural representation in different types of proceedings – the ordering proceedings, litigation (claim) and separate proceedings, and certain categories of cases. It is noted that at present, the legislator does not foresee any restrictions of the application of the institution of representation in any categories of cases, as it was in the CPC of Ukraine of 2004. Concerning the same types of proceedings, it is concluded that the institution of representation is applicable to cases of ordered and claim (general and simplified) proceedings. But in the cases of separate proceedings, this institution cannot be applied at this time. Article received 10.04.2018
{"title":"Представництво в цивільному процесі за новим Цивільним процесуальним кодексом України","authors":"Roksolana Khanyk-Pospolitak","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2018.50-54","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.50-54","url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the representation in the court, which is one of the main institutions of the Civil Procedural Law. The article analyzes the norms of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine in the wording of 2017 of procedural representation. The genesis of this institute in the Civil Process of Ukraine, starting with the Civil Code of the USSR of 1963, is briefly reviewed. The provisions of procedural representation in different types of proceedings are compared, in particular with economic and administrative ones. On the basis of this it is noted that there was a unification of the rules of representation, which is positive in terms of the practice of applying these provisions of the law. Also the author indicates the terminology and definitions used in this institute as applied in literature and legislation; analyzes the provisions of the Code regarding the types of procedural representation and accordingly indicates that the legislation introduced, along the traditional types of representation (legal and voluntary), another type of representation – self-representation. The article focuses on the possibility of applying procedural representation in different types of proceedings – the ordering proceedings, litigation (claim) and separate proceedings, and certain categories of cases. It is noted that at present, the legislator does not foresee any restrictions of the application of the institution of representation in any categories of cases, as it was in the CPC of Ukraine of 2004. Concerning the same types of proceedings, it is concluded that the institution of representation is applicable to cases of ordered and claim (general and simplified) proceedings. But in the cases of separate proceedings, this institution cannot be applied at this time. Article received 10.04.2018","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":"50-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68266493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-01DOI: 10.18523/2617-2607.2018.73-78
Петро Мозолевський
{"title":"Нормативно-правове забезпечення заохочень працівників органів місцевого самоврядування: сутність, проблеми та перспективи","authors":"Петро Мозолевський","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2018.73-78","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.73-78","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68267042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：