Pub Date : 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0014.R1
Monu Jabbal, Jennifer Cherry, Deborah Eastwood, Chloe E H Scott, Phil Walmsley, Emily Baird
Aims: Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) surgery has come under scrutiny for lagging behind other medical specialties in promoting gender and cultural equity and diversity within their workforce. The proportions of female, ethnic minority, and sexual and gender minority individuals within orthopaedic membership bodies are disproportionate to the populations they serve. The aim of this study is to report the findings of a national workforce survey of demographics and working patterns within T&O in Scotland.
Methods: A questionnaire devised by a working group was delivered by the Client Analyst and Relationship Development (CARD) group. Utilizing a secure third party ensured anonymity for all respondents. Data were recorded and analyzed by the CARD group.
Results: A total of 353 responses were recorded, representing 71% of the known workforce. Overall, 261 respondents (74%) identified as male, 85 (24%) female, and seven (2%) preferred not to say. For specialist trainee (ST)3 to ST6, 148 (42%) were female, and for ST7 to ST8, 131 (37%) were female. In total, 226 of all respondents (64%) were white-British, 35 (10%) were white-European, and 92 (26%) were of an ethnic minority background. A total of 321 of respondents (91%) identified as heterosexual, 14 (4%) preferred not to say, and 18 (5%) identified as LGBTQ+ or preferred to self-describe.
Conclusion: This is the largest national workforce survey in contemporary surgical literature. The findings demonstrate a greater proportion of female surgeons overall compared to other studies in T&O. This proportion of females was highest among more junior trainees. The Scottish T&O workforce is more ethnically diverse than the demographics of the population it serves. This study suggests that T&O in Scotland is an evolving speciality in terms of equality and diversity, and is making positive progress.
{"title":"STEP 1: The Scottish Trauma & Orthopaedics Equality Project : demographics and working patterns of a national workforce.","authors":"Monu Jabbal, Jennifer Cherry, Deborah Eastwood, Chloe E H Scott, Phil Walmsley, Emily Baird","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0014.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0014.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) surgery has come under scrutiny for lagging behind other medical specialties in promoting gender and cultural equity and diversity within their workforce. The proportions of female, ethnic minority, and sexual and gender minority individuals within orthopaedic membership bodies are disproportionate to the populations they serve. The aim of this study is to report the findings of a national workforce survey of demographics and working patterns within T&O in Scotland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire devised by a working group was delivered by the Client Analyst and Relationship Development (CARD) group. Utilizing a secure third party ensured anonymity for all respondents. Data were recorded and analyzed by the CARD group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 353 responses were recorded, representing 71% of the known workforce. Overall, 261 respondents (74%) identified as male, 85 (24%) female, and seven (2%) preferred not to say. For specialist trainee (ST)3 to ST6, 148 (42%) were female, and for ST7 to ST8, 131 (37%) were female. In total, 226 of all respondents (64%) were white-British, 35 (10%) were white-European, and 92 (26%) were of an ethnic minority background. A total of 321 of respondents (91%) identified as heterosexual, 14 (4%) preferred not to say, and 18 (5%) identified as LGBTQ+ or preferred to self-describe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the largest national workforce survey in contemporary surgical literature. The findings demonstrate a greater proportion of female surgeons overall compared to other studies in T&O. This proportion of females was highest among more junior trainees. The Scottish T&O workforce is more ethnically diverse than the demographics of the population it serves. This study suggests that T&O in Scotland is an evolving speciality in terms of equality and diversity, and is making positive progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"103-108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143012996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: This study was performed to investigate the association between the acetabular morphology and the joint space narrowing rate (JSNR) in the non-arthritic hip.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed standing whole-leg radiographs of patients who underwent knee arthroplasty from February 2012 to March 2020 at our institute. Patients with a history of hip surgery, Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ II hip osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. The hip JSNR was measured, and the normalized JSNR (nJSNR) was calculated by calibrating the joint space width with the size of the femoral head in 395 patients (790 hips) with a mean age of 73.7 years (SD 8.6). The effects of the lateral centre-edge angle (CEA) and acetabular roof obliquity (ARO) in the standing and supine positions were examined using a multivariate regression model.
Results: The mean JSNR and nJSNR were 0.115 mm/year (SD 0.181) and 2.451 mm/year (SD 3.956), respectively. Multivariate regressions showed that older age was associated with a larger nJSNR (p = 0.010, standardized coefficient (SC) 0.096). The quadratic curve approximation showed that the joint space narrowing was smallest when the CEA was approximately 31.9°. This optimal CEA was the same in the standing and supine positions. Multivariate regressions were separately performed for joints with a CEA of < 31.9° and > 31.9°. When the CEA was < 31.9°, a smaller CEA was associated with a larger nJSNR (p < 0.001, SC 0.282). When the CEA was > 31.9°, a larger CEA was associated with a larger nJSNR (p = 0.012, SC 0.152). The ARO was not associated with the nJSNR.
Conclusion: Both insufficient coverage and over-coverage of the acetabulum over the femoral head were associated with increased joint space narrowing in hips that were non-arthritic at baseline. The effects of insufficient coverage were stronger than those of overcoverage.
{"title":"Association between acetabular coverage over femoral head and rate of joint space narrowing in non-arthritic hips.","authors":"Toshiyuki Kawai, Kohei Nishitani, Yaichiro Okuzu, Koji Goto, Yutaka Kuroda, Shinichi Kuriyama, Shinichiro Nakamura, Shuichi Matsuda","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0143.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0143.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was performed to investigate the association between the acetabular morphology and the joint space narrowing rate (JSNR) in the non-arthritic hip.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed standing whole-leg radiographs of patients who underwent knee arthroplasty from February 2012 to March 2020 at our institute. Patients with a history of hip surgery, Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ II hip osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. The hip JSNR was measured, and the normalized JSNR (nJSNR) was calculated by calibrating the joint space width with the size of the femoral head in 395 patients (790 hips) with a mean age of 73.7 years (SD 8.6). The effects of the lateral centre-edge angle (CEA) and acetabular roof obliquity (ARO) in the standing and supine positions were examined using a multivariate regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean JSNR and nJSNR were 0.115 mm/year (SD 0.181) and 2.451 mm/year (SD 3.956), respectively. Multivariate regressions showed that older age was associated with a larger nJSNR (p = 0.010, standardized coefficient (SC) 0.096). The quadratic curve approximation showed that the joint space narrowing was smallest when the CEA was approximately 31.9°. This optimal CEA was the same in the standing and supine positions. Multivariate regressions were separately performed for joints with a CEA of < 31.9° and > 31.9°. When the CEA was < 31.9°, a smaller CEA was associated with a larger nJSNR (p < 0.001, SC 0.282). When the CEA was > 31.9°, a larger CEA was associated with a larger nJSNR (p = 0.012, SC 0.152). The ARO was not associated with the nJSNR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both insufficient coverage and over-coverage of the acetabulum over the femoral head were associated with increased joint space narrowing in hips that were non-arthritic at baseline. The effects of insufficient coverage were stronger than those of overcoverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"93-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732277/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-14DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0118.R1
Riccardo Ranieri, Mario Borroni, Giacomo Delle Rose, Marco Conti, Raffaele Garofalo, Alessandro Castagna
Aims: The aim of this study was to report long-term clinical outcomes of a modern convertible metal-backed glenoid (MBG) in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).
Methods: After a minimum of 15 years, a previously studied cohort of 35 patients who received a modern convertible MBG during the period 1996 to 2005 was contacted for clinical and radiological follow-up. At last follow-up, patients were evaluated radiologically and clinically according to the Constant Score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analogue scale for pain. Complications and revisions were recorded, and survival analysis was performed.
Results: At the last follow-up, 20 patients were contacted. Of these, 15 patients had experienced at least one complication, and ten underwent revision surgery. The mean time to revision was 13.8 years (7 to 20). Cuff failure was the most common complication. Conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, while maintaining the baseplate, was possible in five cases, with good results. In patients in whom the baseplate was removed, revision was performed significantly later (18.4 vs 11.1 years; p = 0.016). The general revision-free survival was 73% (95% CI 49.5 to 87.3) at 15 years and 38% (95% CI 11.8% to 64.3%) at 20 years, while MBG revision-free survival was 96.0% (95% CI 74.8% to 99.4%) at 15 years and 54% (95% CI 16.2% to 80.8%) at 20 years. Clinical scores showed a negative trend over time, although not statistically significant. Radiologically, polyethylene wear was observed in all cases and was complete in 12 out of 19 cases, and five glenoids were 'at risk' for loosening.
Conclusion: At long-term follow-up, convertible MBG-TSA revealed a high rate of complications and revision surgery, mainly due to soft-tissue failure and polyethylene wear occurring with time. Prompt conversion to RSA maintaining the baseplate provided good results and a low complication rate. Radiological follow-up at about ten years is strictly recommended and, if metal-to-metal contact is observed, conversion to RSA is advisable. These results emphasize the need for continued research into improving TSA outcomes, especially in cases of MBG usage.
目的:本研究的目的是报告全肩关节置换术(TSA)中现代可转换金属支撑关节盂(MBG)的长期临床结果。方法:在至少15年后,先前研究的35名患者在1996年至2005年期间接受了现代可转换MBG,进行了临床和放射随访。最后随访,根据恒评分、简单肩部测试和视觉模拟疼痛量表对患者进行影像学和临床评估。记录并发症和修复,并进行生存分析。结果:末次随访时,共联系20例患者。其中,15名患者经历了至少一种并发症,10名患者接受了翻修手术。平均修订时间为13.8年(7至20年)。袖带衰竭是最常见的并发症。5例患者可以在保持钢板的情况下进行反向肩关节置换术,结果良好。在移除基板的患者中,翻修手术的时间明显较晚(18.4年vs 11.1年;P = 0.016)。一般无修订生存率在15年为73% (95% CI 49.5至87.3),20年为38% (95% CI 11.8%至64.3%),而MBG无修订生存率在15年为96.0% (95% CI 74.8%至99.4%),20年为54% (95% CI 16.2%至80.8%)。临床评分随时间的推移呈负趋势,但无统计学意义。放射学上,所有病例均观察到聚乙烯磨损,19例中有12例完全磨损,5例关节盂有松动的“危险”。结论:在长期随访中,可转换MBG-TSA显示出较高的并发症和翻修手术发生率,主要是由于软组织衰竭和聚乙烯磨损的发生。及时转换为RSA维持基板提供了良好的效果和低并发症发生率。严格建议十年左右的放射随访,如果观察到金属对金属接触,建议转换为RSA。这些结果强调了继续研究改善TSA结果的必要性,特别是在使用MBG的情况下。
{"title":"Convertible metal-backed glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.","authors":"Riccardo Ranieri, Mario Borroni, Giacomo Delle Rose, Marco Conti, Raffaele Garofalo, Alessandro Castagna","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0118.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0118.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to report long-term clinical outcomes of a modern convertible metal-backed glenoid (MBG) in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a minimum of 15 years, a previously studied cohort of 35 patients who received a modern convertible MBG during the period 1996 to 2005 was contacted for clinical and radiological follow-up. At last follow-up, patients were evaluated radiologically and clinically according to the Constant Score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analogue scale for pain. Complications and revisions were recorded, and survival analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the last follow-up, 20 patients were contacted. Of these, 15 patients had experienced at least one complication, and ten underwent revision surgery. The mean time to revision was 13.8 years (7 to 20). Cuff failure was the most common complication. Conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, while maintaining the baseplate, was possible in five cases, with good results. In patients in whom the baseplate was removed, revision was performed significantly later (18.4 vs 11.1 years; p = 0.016). The general revision-free survival was 73% (95% CI 49.5 to 87.3) at 15 years and 38% (95% CI 11.8% to 64.3%) at 20 years, while MBG revision-free survival was 96.0% (95% CI 74.8% to 99.4%) at 15 years and 54% (95% CI 16.2% to 80.8%) at 20 years. Clinical scores showed a negative trend over time, although not statistically significant. Radiologically, polyethylene wear was observed in all cases and was complete in 12 out of 19 cases, and five glenoids were 'at risk' for loosening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At long-term follow-up, convertible MBG-TSA revealed a high rate of complications and revision surgery, mainly due to soft-tissue failure and polyethylene wear occurring with time. Prompt conversion to RSA maintaining the baseplate provided good results and a low complication rate. Radiological follow-up at about ten years is strictly recommended and, if metal-to-metal contact is observed, conversion to RSA is advisable. These results emphasize the need for continued research into improving TSA outcomes, especially in cases of MBG usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"82-92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729753/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-13DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0162.R1
Mirthe H W van Veghel, Liza N van Steenbergen, Maaike G J Gademan, Wilbert B van den Hout, B W Schreurs, Gerjon Hannink
Aims: We estimated the prevalence of people living with at least one hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty in the Netherlands.
Methods: We included the first hip (n = 416,333), knee (n = 314,569), or shoulder (n = 23,751) arthroplasty of each patient aged ≥ 40 years between 2007 and 2022 (hip/knee) or 2014 and 2022 (shoulder) from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Data on the size of the Dutch population were obtained from Statistics Netherlands. Annual incidences and deaths from hip and knee arthroplasty since 2010, and shoulder arthroplasty since 2015, were observed from the LROI. Annual incidences and deaths before those years were estimated using Poisson regression analyses and parametric survival models based on a Gompertz distribution. Non-parametric percentile bootstrapping with resampling was used to estimate 95% CIs.
Results: Annual incidences per 100,000 Dutch inhabitants aged ≥ 40 years increased for hip arthroplasties from 221 (95% CI 214 to 229) in 1990 to 360 in 2022, for knee arthroplasties from 181 (95% CI 174 to 188) to 272, and for shoulder arthroplasties from 11 (95% CI 8.0 to 16) to 34. In 2022, 791,000 (95% CI 787,000 to 794,000) people in the Netherlands were living with at least one joint replacement, representing 8.4% (95% CI 8.4 to 8.5) of the Dutch population aged ≥ 40 years. For hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties, these were 436,000 (95% CI 433,000 to 438,000), 383,000 (95% CI 380,000 to 386,000), and 34,000 (95% CI 33,000 to 36,000) people, corresponding to 4.7% (95% CI 4.6 to 4.7), 4.1% (95% CI 4.1 to 4.1), and 0.4% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.4) of the Dutch population, respectively. The most common age group living with at least one joint replacement was the ≥ 80-year age group, representing 38% (95% CI 37 to 38) of the Dutch population aged ≥ 80 years.
Conclusion: Approximately 800,000 people in the Netherlands were living with at least one hip, knee, or shoulder replacement in 2022, representing one in 12 Dutch inhabitants aged ≥ 40 years.
目的:我们估计了荷兰至少做过一次髋关节、膝关节或肩关节置换术的人群的患病率。方法:我们纳入了2007年至2022年(髋关节/膝关节)或2014年至2022年(肩部)年龄≥40岁的每位患者的第一次髋关节(n = 416,333)、膝关节(n = 314,569)或肩部(n = 23,751)关节置换术,这些患者来自荷兰关节置换术登记册(LROI)。关于荷兰人口规模的数据来自荷兰统计局。从LROI观察了自2010年以来髋关节和膝关节置换术的年发病率和死亡率,以及自2015年以来的肩关节置换术。使用泊松回归分析和基于Gompertz分布的参数生存模型估计这些年之前的年发病率和死亡率。使用非参数百分位自举和重采样来估计95%的ci。结果:每10万≥40岁荷兰居民髋关节置换术的年发病率从1990年的221例(95% CI 214 - 229)增加到2022年的360例,膝关节置换术从181例(95% CI 174 - 188)增加到272例,肩关节置换术从11例(95% CI 8.0 - 16)增加到34例。2022年,荷兰有791,000人(95% CI 787,000至794,000)至少接受过一次关节置换术,占荷兰40岁以上人口的8.4% (95% CI 8.4至8.5)。髋关节、膝关节和肩关节置换术患者分别为43.6万人(95% CI 43.3万~ 43.8万)、38.3万人(95% CI 38万~ 38.6万)和3.4万人(95% CI 3.3万~ 3.6万),分别占荷兰人口的4.7% (95% CI 4.6 ~ 4.7)、4.1% (95% CI 4.1 ~ 4.1)和0.4% (95% CI 0.3 ~ 0.4)。至少进行一次关节置换术的最常见年龄组是≥80岁年龄组,占荷兰≥80岁人口的38% (95% CI 37 - 38)。结论:到2022年,荷兰约有80万人至少接受过一次髋关节、膝关节或肩关节置换术,占年龄≥40岁的荷兰居民的1 / 12。
{"title":"How many people in the Netherlands live with a hip, knee, or shoulder replacement?","authors":"Mirthe H W van Veghel, Liza N van Steenbergen, Maaike G J Gademan, Wilbert B van den Hout, B W Schreurs, Gerjon Hannink","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0162.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0162.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We estimated the prevalence of people living with at least one hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included the first hip (n = 416,333), knee (n = 314,569), or shoulder (n = 23,751) arthroplasty of each patient aged ≥ 40 years between 2007 and 2022 (hip/knee) or 2014 and 2022 (shoulder) from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Data on the size of the Dutch population were obtained from Statistics Netherlands. Annual incidences and deaths from hip and knee arthroplasty since 2010, and shoulder arthroplasty since 2015, were observed from the LROI. Annual incidences and deaths before those years were estimated using Poisson regression analyses and parametric survival models based on a Gompertz distribution. Non-parametric percentile bootstrapping with resampling was used to estimate 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual incidences per 100,000 Dutch inhabitants aged ≥ 40 years increased for hip arthroplasties from 221 (95% CI 214 to 229) in 1990 to 360 in 2022, for knee arthroplasties from 181 (95% CI 174 to 188) to 272, and for shoulder arthroplasties from 11 (95% CI 8.0 to 16) to 34. In 2022, 791,000 (95% CI 787,000 to 794,000) people in the Netherlands were living with at least one joint replacement, representing 8.4% (95% CI 8.4 to 8.5) of the Dutch population aged ≥ 40 years. For hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties, these were 436,000 (95% CI 433,000 to 438,000), 383,000 (95% CI 380,000 to 386,000), and 34,000 (95% CI 33,000 to 36,000) people, corresponding to 4.7% (95% CI 4.6 to 4.7), 4.1% (95% CI 4.1 to 4.1), and 0.4% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.4) of the Dutch population, respectively. The most common age group living with at least one joint replacement was the ≥ 80-year age group, representing 38% (95% CI 37 to 38) of the Dutch population aged ≥ 80 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately 800,000 people in the Netherlands were living with at least one hip, knee, or shoulder replacement in 2022, representing one in 12 Dutch inhabitants aged ≥ 40 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"74-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725376/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142972422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-11DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0176.R1
Rosie Mc Colgan, Fiona Boland, Gerard A Sheridan, Grainne Colgan, Deepa Bose, Deborah M Eastwood, David M Dalton
Aims: The aim of this study was to explore differences in operative autonomy by trainee gender during orthopaedic training in Ireland and the UK, and to explore differences in operative autonomy by trainee gender with regard to training year, case complexity, index procedures, and speciality area.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined all operations recorded by orthopaedic trainees in Ireland and the UK between July 2012 and July 2022. The primary outcome was operative autonomy, which was defined as the trainee performing the case without the supervising trainer scrubbed.
Results: A total of 3,533,223 operations were included for analysis. Overall, male trainees performed 5% more operations with autonomy than female trainees (30.5% vs 25.5%; 95% CI 4.85 to 5.09). Female trainees assisted for 3% more operations (35% vs 32%; 95% CI 2.91 to 3.17) and performed 2% more operations with a supervising trainer scrubbed (39% vs 37%; 95% CI 1.79 to 2.06). Male trainees performed more operations with autonomy than female trainees in every year of training, in each category of case complexity, for each orthopaedic speciality area, and for every index procedure except nerve decompression. When adjusting for year, training level, case complexity, speciality area, and urgency, male trainees had 145% (95% CI 2.18 to 2.76) increased odds of performing an operation with autonomy and 35% (95% CI 1.25 to 1.45) increased odds of performing an operation under trainer supervision, than assisting, compared to female trainees.
Conclusion: Male trainees perform more operations with autonomy during orthopaedic training than female trainees. Female orthopaedic trainees assist for a greater proportion of cases than their male counterparts. A comprehensive review of trauma and orthopaedic training is needed to identify any additional differences in training opportunities between female and male trainees, particularly with regard to progression through training.
目的:本研究的目的是探讨爱尔兰和英国骨科培训中不同性别学员的手术自主性差异,并探讨不同性别学员在培训年份、病例复杂性、指标程序和专业领域方面的手术自主性差异。方法:这项回顾性队列研究检查了2012年7月至2022年7月期间爱尔兰和英国骨科实习生记录的所有手术。主要结果是手术自主性,这被定义为受训者在没有监督培训师擦洗的情况下执行病例。结果:共纳入3,533,223例手术进行分析。总体而言,男性受训者比女性受训者多完成5%的自主手术(30.5% vs 25.5%;95% CI 4.85 ~ 5.09)。女性受训者辅助手术的比例增加3% (35% vs 32%);95% CI 2.91至3.17),在监督培训师擦洗的情况下多进行2%的手术(39%对37%;95% CI 1.79 ~ 2.06)。在每一年的培训中,在每个病例复杂性类别中,在每个骨科专业领域中,在除神经减压外的每个指标手术中,男性实习生的自主手术量均高于女性实习生。当对年份、培训水平、病例复杂性、专业领域和紧急程度进行调整后,与女性受训者相比,男性受训者自主执行手术的几率增加了145% (95% CI 2.18至2.76),在培训师监督下执行手术的几率增加了35% (95% CI 1.25至1.45)。结论:在骨科训练中,男性学员比女性学员更能自主地完成手术。女性骨科受训者比男性受训者协助的病例比例更大。需要对创伤和骨科培训进行全面审查,以确定女性和男性受训者在培训机会方面的任何其他差异,特别是在通过培训取得进展方面。
{"title":"The correlation between trainee gender and operative autonomy during trauma and orthopaedic training in Ireland and the UK.","authors":"Rosie Mc Colgan, Fiona Boland, Gerard A Sheridan, Grainne Colgan, Deepa Bose, Deborah M Eastwood, David M Dalton","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0176.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0176.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore differences in operative autonomy by trainee gender during orthopaedic training in Ireland and the UK, and to explore differences in operative autonomy by trainee gender with regard to training year, case complexity, index procedures, and speciality area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined all operations recorded by orthopaedic trainees in Ireland and the UK between July 2012 and July 2022. The primary outcome was operative autonomy, which was defined as the trainee performing the case without the supervising trainer scrubbed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,533,223 operations were included for analysis. Overall, male trainees performed 5% more operations with autonomy than female trainees (30.5% vs 25.5%; 95% CI 4.85 to 5.09). Female trainees assisted for 3% more operations (35% vs 32%; 95% CI 2.91 to 3.17) and performed 2% more operations with a supervising trainer scrubbed (39% vs 37%; 95% CI 1.79 to 2.06). Male trainees performed more operations with autonomy than female trainees in every year of training, in each category of case complexity, for each orthopaedic speciality area, and for every index procedure except nerve decompression. When adjusting for year, training level, case complexity, speciality area, and urgency, male trainees had 145% (95% CI 2.18 to 2.76) increased odds of performing an operation with autonomy and 35% (95% CI 1.25 to 1.45) increased odds of performing an operation under trainer supervision, than assisting, compared to female trainees.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male trainees perform more operations with autonomy during orthopaedic training than female trainees. Female orthopaedic trainees assist for a greater proportion of cases than their male counterparts. A comprehensive review of trauma and orthopaedic training is needed to identify any additional differences in training opportunities between female and male trainees, particularly with regard to progression through training.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"62-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723784/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142967144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1
Nikhil Agarwal, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Nick D Clement
Aims: The primary aim of this study is to compare mobility status of patients receiving oral oxycodone with those receiving subcutaneous alfentanil as analgesic methods prior to mobilization to help physiotherapy compliance after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aims are to assess postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, in-hospital length of stay, total use of analgesia over postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD 1 and POD 2), complication rates within 30 days, and 30-day mortality rates.
Methods: A single-centre, prospective cohort study of 64 patients will be undertaken. Patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures at the study centre will be recruited. Patients with a hip fracture meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled on admission. Patients who have been administered oral oxycodone will be compared to those prescribed alfentanil for pain prior to mobilization with physiotherapists on POD 1 and POD 2. Which drug a patient receives is reliant of the prescriptions given by the medical team, and in current practice this varies at approximately 50:50. Mobilization will be defined as the ability to stand on and weightbear both feet with or without assistance.
Results: Visual analogue scale pain scores, mobility status, and total analgesia use will be assessed on POD 1 and POD 2. EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores, complication rates, and mortality rates will be assessed up to 30 days following surgery (POD 1, 2, 7, and 30).
Conclusion: This study will help to build a wider protocol aiming to improve early mobilization after hip fracture surgery. The results of this study will provide pain scores and mobility status which will either support use of subcutaneous alfentanil as the standard analgesic modality prior to physiotherapy sessions, or highlight its limitations compared to the standard oral oxycodone. Secondary outcomes will also help to assess if early mobilization improves outcomes compared to delayed mobilization.
{"title":"Is the Rate of Early mobilization in Hip fracture patients using Alfentanil Better than standard opioid analgesia (REHAB)? A protocol for a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Nikhil Agarwal, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Nick D Clement","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0076.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The primary aim of this study is to compare mobility status of patients receiving oral oxycodone with those receiving subcutaneous alfentanil as analgesic methods prior to mobilization to help physiotherapy compliance after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aims are to assess postoperative pain, health-related quality of life, in-hospital length of stay, total use of analgesia over postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD 1 and POD 2), complication rates within 30 days, and 30-day mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre, prospective cohort study of 64 patients will be undertaken. Patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures at the study centre will be recruited. Patients with a hip fracture meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled on admission. Patients who have been administered oral oxycodone will be compared to those prescribed alfentanil for pain prior to mobilization with physiotherapists on POD 1 and POD 2. Which drug a patient receives is reliant of the prescriptions given by the medical team, and in current practice this varies at approximately 50:50. Mobilization will be defined as the ability to stand on and weightbear both feet with or without assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual analogue scale pain scores, mobility status, and total analgesia use will be assessed on POD 1 and POD 2. EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire scores, complication rates, and mortality rates will be assessed up to 30 days following surgery (POD 1, 2, 7, and 30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will help to build a wider protocol aiming to improve early mobilization after hip fracture surgery. The results of this study will provide pain scores and mobility status which will either support use of subcutaneous alfentanil as the standard analgesic modality prior to physiotherapy sessions, or highlight its limitations compared to the standard oral oxycodone. Secondary outcomes will also help to assess if early mobilization improves outcomes compared to delayed mobilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717437/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-09DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0113.R1
Héctor J Aguado, Héctor J Aguado, Pablo Castillón-Bernal, Jordi Teixidor-Serra, Yaiza García-Sánchez, Josep M Muñoz-Vives, Pilar Camacho-Carrasco, Montsant Jornet-Gibert, Cristina Ojeda-Thies, Pablo García-Portabella, Adela Pereda-Manso, Elvira Mateos-Álvarez, Virginia García-Virto, David Noriega-González, Begoña A Álvarez-Ramos, Mª F Muñoz-Moreno, Irene Arroyo-Hernantes, Carmen Martínez-Sellés, Sergio Marín-Jiménez, Adriana Acha, Jordi Tomás-Hernández, Jordi Selga-Marsà, José V Andrés-Peiró, Carlos Piedra-Calle, Ferrán Blasco-Casado, Ernesto Guerra-Farfán, Jordi Querolt-Coll, Guillermo T de Santamaría, Carles Gil-Aliberas, Borja Campuzano-Bitterling, Eliam Ajuria Fernández, Rebeca Díaz Suárez, Eugenia Fernández Manzano, Unai G De Cortázar, Mirentxu Arrieta, Daniel Escobar, Estíbaliz Castrillo, Patricia Balvis, Maciej Denisiuk, Jesús Moreta, Xabier Uriarte, Andrea Vea, Patricia Jiménez-Tellería, Beatriz Olías-López, Patricia Amaya-Espinosa, Juan Boluda-Mengod, Juan C Borrás-Cebrián, Carles Martínez-Pérez, Patricio A Freile Pazmiño, Pablo Calavia-Calé, Miguel Á Suárez-Suárez, Antonio García Arias, José Valle-Cruz, Javier García-Coiradas, María Á Cano Leira, César Bonome-Roel, Antonio Benjumea Carrasco, Marcos Chico-García, Coral Sánchez Pérez, Rodrigo J Priego Sánchez, Ana L Pariza, Alexis Fernández-Juan, Eladio Saura-Sánchez, Sandra Giménez-Ibáñez, Plácido Sánchez-Gómez, F J Ricón-Recarey, Jesús Jiménez-Olivares, Silvia Correoso-Castellanos, Elena M García, Isabel Medrano-Morte, Francisco Cuadrado-Abajo, María E Laguna-Bercero, Pedro D Pozo-Manrique, Francisco M G Navas-García, Ester García-Paredero, Teresa B Robles, Inés Navas-Pernía, Gonzalo Gálvez-Márquez, Ignasi D Villasante-Jirón, Joan Vilanova-Laguna, Miquel Videla-Ces, Teresa Serra Porta, Gloria González-Ojeda, Carmen C Becerra, Silvia Pena Paz, Fátima Fernández-Dorado, Amaia Martínez-Menduiña, Víctor Vaquerizo-García, Antonio Murcia-Asensio, Elena Galián-Muñoz, Carmelo Marín-Martínez, Adrián Muñoz-Vicente, Nuria Plaza-Salazar, Carla Gámez-Asunción, Jennifer Benito-Santamaría, Ana V González, Laura A Viana, Juan Mingo-Robinet, Amaya Barbería-Biurrun, Emma Escudero-Martínez, Laura Chouza-Montero, María Naharro-Tobío, Alfons Gasset-Teixidor, Andrea Domínguez-Ibarrola, J M Peñalver, Jorge Serrano-Sanz, Adrián Roche-Albero, Carlos Martín-Hernández, María Macho-Mier, Julián C Segura-Nuez, José C Saló-Cuenca, Jordi E Roselló, Guillermo Criado-Albillos, Hugo G Cabello-Benavides, David A Nestar, Jorge Martínez-Íñiguez Blasco, José M Bogallo-Dorado, Juan R Cano-Porras, Fernando Marqués-López, Santos Martínez-Díaz, Guido S Carabelli, Pablo I Slullitel, Ignacio Astore, Carlos Hernández-Pascual, Javier Marín-Sánchez, Iván Dot-Pascuet, Ana Piñeiro-Borrero, José M Pérez-Sánchez, Alfonso Mandía-Martínez, Julio D Caso-Rodríguez, Jordi Martín-Marcuello, Miguel Benito-Mateo, Ainhoa Jaúregui-Garasa, Imanol Gabarain-Morcillo, María R González-Panisello, Marta Miñana-Barrios, Susana Iglesias-Fernández, Raquel García-Albea, María C González-López
Aims: The Peri-Implant and PeriProsthetic Survival AnalysiS (PIPPAS) study aimed to investigate the risk factors for one-year mortality of femoral peri-implant fractures (FPIFs).
Methods: This prospective, multicentre, observational study involved 440 FPIF patients with a minimum one-year follow-up. Data on demographics, clinical features, fracture characteristics, management, and mortality rates were collected and analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analyses. FPIF patients were elderly (median age 87 years (IQR 81 to 92)), mostly female (82.5%, n = 363), and frail: median clinical frailty scale 6 (IQR 4 to 7), median Pfeiffer 4 (1 to 7), median age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 6 (IQR 5 to 7), and 58.9% (n = 250) were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III.
Results: Overall, 90.5% (n = 398) of the patients were treated surgically, 57.0% (n = 227) retained the implant, and 88.7% (n = 353) managed with fixation. Mortality rates were 8.2% (n = 3.6) in-hospital, 11.4% (n = 50) at 30 days, 21.1% (n = 93) at six months, and 21.6% (n = 95) at 12 months. Medical complications, mainly delirium, were common in the acute setting (52.7%, n = 215). The nonunion rate was 4.1% (n = 18). Mortality risk factors in the univariate analysis were age, living at a nursing home, no walking outdoors, frailty variables, fractures in the distal epiphysis, fractures around a proximal nail, discharge to a healthcare facility, and no osteoporotic treatment at discharge. Protective factors against mortality in the univariate analysis were surgical treatment by an experienced surgeon, management without an arthroplasty, allowing full weightbearing, mobilization in the first 48 hours postoperatively, and geriatric involvement. Risk factors for mortality in the multivariate analysis were cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer's questionnaire) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.14 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.23), p = 0.002), age-adjusted CCI (HR 1.18 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.30), p = 0.001), and antiaggregant or anticoagulant medication at admission (HR 2.00 (95% CI 1.19 to 3.38), p = 0.009). Haemoglobin level at admission was protective against mortality (HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.97), p = 0.018).
Conclusion: Mortality in FPIFs occurs mainly within the first six months of follow-up. Early co-management and clinical optimization, particularly targeting frail older patients, is crucial in reducing mortality following these fractures.
{"title":"Risk factors for one-year mortality in 440 femoral peri-implant fractures: insights from the PIPPAS prospective, multicentre, observational study.","authors":"Héctor J Aguado, Héctor J Aguado, Pablo Castillón-Bernal, Jordi Teixidor-Serra, Yaiza García-Sánchez, Josep M Muñoz-Vives, Pilar Camacho-Carrasco, Montsant Jornet-Gibert, Cristina Ojeda-Thies, Pablo García-Portabella, Adela Pereda-Manso, Elvira Mateos-Álvarez, Virginia García-Virto, David Noriega-González, Begoña A Álvarez-Ramos, Mª F Muñoz-Moreno, Irene Arroyo-Hernantes, Carmen Martínez-Sellés, Sergio Marín-Jiménez, Adriana Acha, Jordi Tomás-Hernández, Jordi Selga-Marsà, José V Andrés-Peiró, Carlos Piedra-Calle, Ferrán Blasco-Casado, Ernesto Guerra-Farfán, Jordi Querolt-Coll, Guillermo T de Santamaría, Carles Gil-Aliberas, Borja Campuzano-Bitterling, Eliam Ajuria Fernández, Rebeca Díaz Suárez, Eugenia Fernández Manzano, Unai G De Cortázar, Mirentxu Arrieta, Daniel Escobar, Estíbaliz Castrillo, Patricia Balvis, Maciej Denisiuk, Jesús Moreta, Xabier Uriarte, Andrea Vea, Patricia Jiménez-Tellería, Beatriz Olías-López, Patricia Amaya-Espinosa, Juan Boluda-Mengod, Juan C Borrás-Cebrián, Carles Martínez-Pérez, Patricio A Freile Pazmiño, Pablo Calavia-Calé, Miguel Á Suárez-Suárez, Antonio García Arias, José Valle-Cruz, Javier García-Coiradas, María Á Cano Leira, César Bonome-Roel, Antonio Benjumea Carrasco, Marcos Chico-García, Coral Sánchez Pérez, Rodrigo J Priego Sánchez, Ana L Pariza, Alexis Fernández-Juan, Eladio Saura-Sánchez, Sandra Giménez-Ibáñez, Plácido Sánchez-Gómez, F J Ricón-Recarey, Jesús Jiménez-Olivares, Silvia Correoso-Castellanos, Elena M García, Isabel Medrano-Morte, Francisco Cuadrado-Abajo, María E Laguna-Bercero, Pedro D Pozo-Manrique, Francisco M G Navas-García, Ester García-Paredero, Teresa B Robles, Inés Navas-Pernía, Gonzalo Gálvez-Márquez, Ignasi D Villasante-Jirón, Joan Vilanova-Laguna, Miquel Videla-Ces, Teresa Serra Porta, Gloria González-Ojeda, Carmen C Becerra, Silvia Pena Paz, Fátima Fernández-Dorado, Amaia Martínez-Menduiña, Víctor Vaquerizo-García, Antonio Murcia-Asensio, Elena Galián-Muñoz, Carmelo Marín-Martínez, Adrián Muñoz-Vicente, Nuria Plaza-Salazar, Carla Gámez-Asunción, Jennifer Benito-Santamaría, Ana V González, Laura A Viana, Juan Mingo-Robinet, Amaya Barbería-Biurrun, Emma Escudero-Martínez, Laura Chouza-Montero, María Naharro-Tobío, Alfons Gasset-Teixidor, Andrea Domínguez-Ibarrola, J M Peñalver, Jorge Serrano-Sanz, Adrián Roche-Albero, Carlos Martín-Hernández, María Macho-Mier, Julián C Segura-Nuez, José C Saló-Cuenca, Jordi E Roselló, Guillermo Criado-Albillos, Hugo G Cabello-Benavides, David A Nestar, Jorge Martínez-Íñiguez Blasco, José M Bogallo-Dorado, Juan R Cano-Porras, Fernando Marqués-López, Santos Martínez-Díaz, Guido S Carabelli, Pablo I Slullitel, Ignacio Astore, Carlos Hernández-Pascual, Javier Marín-Sánchez, Iván Dot-Pascuet, Ana Piñeiro-Borrero, José M Pérez-Sánchez, Alfonso Mandía-Martínez, Julio D Caso-Rodríguez, Jordi Martín-Marcuello, Miguel Benito-Mateo, Ainhoa Jaúregui-Garasa, Imanol Gabarain-Morcillo, María R González-Panisello, Marta Miñana-Barrios, Susana Iglesias-Fernández, Raquel García-Albea, María C González-López","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0113.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0113.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Peri-Implant and PeriProsthetic Survival AnalysiS (PIPPAS) study aimed to investigate the risk factors for one-year mortality of femoral peri-implant fractures (FPIFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicentre, observational study involved 440 FPIF patients with a minimum one-year follow-up. Data on demographics, clinical features, fracture characteristics, management, and mortality rates were collected and analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analyses. FPIF patients were elderly (median age 87 years (IQR 81 to 92)), mostly female (82.5%, n = 363), and frail: median clinical frailty scale 6 (IQR 4 to 7), median Pfeiffer 4 (1 to 7), median age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 6 (IQR 5 to 7), and 58.9% (n = 250) were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 90.5% (n = 398) of the patients were treated surgically, 57.0% (n = 227) retained the implant, and 88.7% (n = 353) managed with fixation. Mortality rates were 8.2% (n = 3.6) in-hospital, 11.4% (n = 50) at 30 days, 21.1% (n = 93) at six months, and 21.6% (n = 95) at 12 months. Medical complications, mainly delirium, were common in the acute setting (52.7%, n = 215). The nonunion rate was 4.1% (n = 18). Mortality risk factors in the univariate analysis were age, living at a nursing home, no walking outdoors, frailty variables, fractures in the distal epiphysis, fractures around a proximal nail, discharge to a healthcare facility, and no osteoporotic treatment at discharge. Protective factors against mortality in the univariate analysis were surgical treatment by an experienced surgeon, management without an arthroplasty, allowing full weightbearing, mobilization in the first 48 hours postoperatively, and geriatric involvement. Risk factors for mortality in the multivariate analysis were cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer's questionnaire) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.14 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.23), p = 0.002), age-adjusted CCI (HR 1.18 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.30), p = 0.001), and antiaggregant or anticoagulant medication at admission (HR 2.00 (95% CI 1.19 to 3.38), p = 0.009). Haemoglobin level at admission was protective against mortality (HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.97), p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mortality in FPIFs occurs mainly within the first six months of follow-up. Early co-management and clinical optimization, particularly targeting frail older patients, is crucial in reducing mortality following these fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11712530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-08DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0038.R1
Maximilian Fischer, Lars Nonnenmacher, Andre Hofer, Alexander Zimmerer, Andreas Nitsch, Rico Großjohann, Sabrina Erdmann, Georgi I Wassilew
Aims: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is well established for acetabular reorientation and has shown successful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Nevertheless, studies focusing on postoperative outcomes related to patient individual factors are still underrepresented. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the functional outcome and activity level in relation to patient sex with a minimum follow-up of two years after PAO for mild to severe hip dysplasia.
Methods: A single-centre study was conducted, enrolling patients undergoing PAO and completing a preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical outcome assessment. The PROMs were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) with the subscales for pain, sport, activities of daily living (ADL), and quality of life (QoL), and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. Kendall's tau were calculated for correlation analyses.
Results: In total, 145 patients (28 male, 117 female) were included. The PROMs improved significantly across males and females at the latest follow-up. Female patients had significantly lower preoperative PROMs: mHHS (47 vs 57.4; p = 0.002); HOOS pain (44.9 vs 60; p = 0.003), sport (47 vs 57.4; p = 0.002), ADL (58.9 vs 69.3; p = 0.032), and QoL (26.8 vs 39.3; p = 0.009); and UCLA (5.6 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) scores. Males showed higher postoperative UCLA scores (7.5 vs 6.7; p = 0.03). Kendall's tau showed significant negative correlation between BMI and UCLA scores in females and males (-0.21 to -0.29; p = 0.002/0.048), while BMI and HOOS sport (-0.16; p = 0.015) and ADL (-0.2; p = 0.003), as well as QoL (-0.14; p = 0.031) and preoperative acetabular inclination (-0.13; p = 0.049) were only significantly negatively correlated in females.
Conclusion: Patient sex affects PROMs before and after PAO. Female patients experience higher improvement in hip function and activity level, due to poorer preoperative PROMs than males. Thus, these data are particularly interesting in providing preoperative guidance regarding postoperative outcome expectations.
目的:髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)是髋臼重新定位的良好方法,并且在患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)中显示出成功的改善。然而,关注与患者个体因素相关的术后结果的研究仍然不足。因此,本研究旨在分析轻度至重度髋关节发育不良PAO术后至少随访两年的功能结局和活动水平与患者性别的关系。方法:进行了一项单中心研究,招募了接受PAO治疗的患者,并完成了术前和术后的放射学和临床结果评估。采用改良的Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)(含疼痛、运动、日常生活活动(ADL)和生活质量(QoL)亚量表)和加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分对PROMs进行评估。计算Kendall’s tau进行相关分析。结果:共纳入145例患者,其中男28例,女117例。在最近的随访中,男性和女性的PROMs显著改善。女性患者术前PROMs明显降低:mHHS (47 vs 57.4;P = 0.002);HOOS疼痛(44.9 vs 60;P = 0.003),运动(47 vs 57.4;p = 0.002), ADL (58.9 vs 69.3;p = 0.032),生活质量(26.8 vs 39.3;P = 0.009);UCLA (5.6 vs 6.7, p = 0.042)得分。男性术后UCLA评分较高(7.5 vs 6.7;P = 0.03)。女性和男性的BMI与UCLA评分呈显著负相关(-0.21 ~ -0.29;p = 0.002/0.048), BMI和HOOS运动(-0.16;p = 0.015)和ADL (-0.2;p = 0.003),生活质量(-0.14;P = 0.031)和术前髋臼倾角(-0.13;P = 0.049),仅在女性中呈显著负相关。结论:患者性别影响PAO前后的PROMs。由于术前PROMs较差,女性患者在髋关节功能和活动水平方面的改善程度高于男性。因此,这些数据对于术前指导术后预后预期具有重要意义。
{"title":"Sex-related functional outcome after periacetabular osteotomy in mild to severe hip dysplasia.","authors":"Maximilian Fischer, Lars Nonnenmacher, Andre Hofer, Alexander Zimmerer, Andreas Nitsch, Rico Großjohann, Sabrina Erdmann, Georgi I Wassilew","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0038.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0038.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is well established for acetabular reorientation and has shown successful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Nevertheless, studies focusing on postoperative outcomes related to patient individual factors are still underrepresented. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the functional outcome and activity level in relation to patient sex with a minimum follow-up of two years after PAO for mild to severe hip dysplasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre study was conducted, enrolling patients undergoing PAO and completing a preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical outcome assessment. The PROMs were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) with the subscales for pain, sport, activities of daily living (ADL), and quality of life (QoL), and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. Kendall's tau were calculated for correlation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 145 patients (28 male, 117 female) were included. The PROMs improved significantly across males and females at the latest follow-up. Female patients had significantly lower preoperative PROMs: mHHS (47 vs 57.4; p = 0.002); HOOS pain (44.9 vs 60; p = 0.003), sport (47 vs 57.4; p = 0.002), ADL (58.9 vs 69.3; p = 0.032), and QoL (26.8 vs 39.3; p = 0.009); and UCLA (5.6 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) scores. Males showed higher postoperative UCLA scores (7.5 vs 6.7; p = 0.03). Kendall's tau showed significant negative correlation between BMI and UCLA scores in females and males (-0.21 to -0.29; p = 0.002/0.048), while BMI and HOOS sport (-0.16; p = 0.015) and ADL (-0.2; p = 0.003), as well as QoL (-0.14; p = 0.031) and preoperative acetabular inclination (-0.13; p = 0.049) were only significantly negatively correlated in females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient sex affects PROMs before and after PAO. Female patients experience higher improvement in hip function and activity level, due to poorer preoperative PROMs than males. Thus, these data are particularly interesting in providing preoperative guidance regarding postoperative outcome expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706631/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0096.R1
Sebastian Findeisen, Louis Mennerat, Thomas Ferbert, Lars Helbig, Tim N Bewersdorf, Tobias Großner, Christian Schamberger, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Michael Tanner
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological outcome of patients with large bone defects in the femur and tibia who were treated according to the guidelines of the diamond concept in our department (Centre for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, and Paraplegiology).
Methods: The following retrospective, descriptive analysis consists of patients treated in our department between January 2010 and December 2021. In total, 628 patients were registered, of whom 108 presented with a large-sized defect (≥ 5 cm). A total of 70 patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was radiological consolidation of nonunions after one and two years via a modified Lane-Sandhu Score, including only radiological parameters.
Results: The mean defect size was 6.77 cm (SD 1.86), with the largest defect being 12.6 cm. Within two years after surgical treatment, 45 patients (64.3%) presented consolidation of the previous nonunion. After one year, six patients (8.6%) showed complete consolidation and 23 patients (32.9%) showed a considerable callus formation, whereas 41 patients (58.6%) showed a Lane-Sandhu score of 2 or below. Two years after surgery, 24 patients (34.3%) were categorized as Lane-Sandhu score 4, another 23 patients (32.9%) reached a score of 3, while 14 patients (20.0%) remained without final consolidation (score ≤ 2). A total of nine patients (12.9%) missed the two-year follow-up. The mean follow-up was 44.40 months (SD 32.00). The mean time period from nonunion surgery to consolidation was 16.42 months (SD 9.73).
Conclusion: Patients with presentation of a large-sized nonunion require a structured and sufficiently long follow-up to secure the consolidation of the former nonunion. Furthermore, a follow-up of at least two years is required in order to declare a nonunion as consolidated, given that a significant part of the nonunions declared as not consolidated at one year showed consolidation within the second year. Moreover, the proven "gold standard" of a two-step procedure, so called Masquelet technique, shows effectiveness.
目的:本研究的目的是评估在我科(骨科、创伤外科和截瘫中心)按照钻石概念指导治疗的股骨和胫骨大骨缺损患者的放射学结果。方法:对2010年1月至2021年12月在我科治疗的患者进行回顾性、描述性分析。共登记628例患者,其中108例出现大尺寸缺损(≥5 cm)。共有70例患者符合纳入标准。主要终点是一年后和两年后通过改良的Lane-Sandhu评分进行骨不连的放射学巩固,仅包括放射学参数。结果:平均缺损尺寸为6.77 cm (SD 1.86),最大缺损为12.6 cm。术后两年内,45例患者(64.3%)出现先前骨不连的巩固。1年后,6例患者(8.6%)表现为完全实变,23例患者(32.9%)表现为相当程度的骨痂形成,41例患者(58.6%)的Lane-Sandhu评分为2分或以下。术后2年Lane-Sandhu评分为4分的患者24例(34.3%),评分为3分的患者23例(32.9%),未最终巩固(评分≤2)的患者14例(20.0%),共有9例(12.9%)患者错过2年随访。平均随访44.40个月(SD 32.00)。从手术不愈合到巩固的平均时间为16.42个月(SD 9.73)。结论:出现大面积骨不连的患者需要有组织且足够长的随访以确保前骨不连的巩固。此外,考虑到在一年内宣布未愈合的骨不连的很大一部分在第二年显示愈合,需要至少两年的随访才能宣布骨不连为愈合。此外,经过验证的“黄金标准”的两步程序,即所谓的面具技术,显示出有效性。
{"title":"Surgical nonunion treatment of large-sized defects of femur and tibia based on the diamond concept.","authors":"Sebastian Findeisen, Louis Mennerat, Thomas Ferbert, Lars Helbig, Tim N Bewersdorf, Tobias Großner, Christian Schamberger, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Michael Tanner","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0096.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0096.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological outcome of patients with large bone defects in the femur and tibia who were treated according to the guidelines of the diamond concept in our department (Centre for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, and Paraplegiology).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following retrospective, descriptive analysis consists of patients treated in our department between January 2010 and December 2021. In total, 628 patients were registered, of whom 108 presented with a large-sized defect (≥ 5 cm). A total of 70 patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was radiological consolidation of nonunions after one and two years via a modified Lane-Sandhu Score, including only radiological parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean defect size was 6.77 cm (SD 1.86), with the largest defect being 12.6 cm. Within two years after surgical treatment, 45 patients (64.3%) presented consolidation of the previous nonunion. After one year, six patients (8.6%) showed complete consolidation and 23 patients (32.9%) showed a considerable callus formation, whereas 41 patients (58.6%) showed a Lane-Sandhu score of 2 or below. Two years after surgery, 24 patients (34.3%) were categorized as Lane-Sandhu score 4, another 23 patients (32.9%) reached a score of 3, while 14 patients (20.0%) remained without final consolidation (score ≤ 2). A total of nine patients (12.9%) missed the two-year follow-up. The mean follow-up was 44.40 months (SD 32.00). The mean time period from nonunion surgery to consolidation was 16.42 months (SD 9.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with presentation of a large-sized nonunion require a structured and sufficiently long follow-up to secure the consolidation of the former nonunion. Furthermore, a follow-up of at least two years is required in order to declare a nonunion as consolidated, given that a significant part of the nonunions declared as not consolidated at one year showed consolidation within the second year. Moreover, the proven \"gold standard\" of a two-step procedure, so called Masquelet technique, shows effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"26-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-04DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0186
Joanna Craven, Olivia O'Malley, Daniel C Perry
Aims: This study aims to define a set of family-centred core outcomes for infants undergoing brace treatment to facilitate consistent reporting for future high-quality research.
Methods: Family-centred outcomes will be identified through a literature review and a scoping survey involving key stakeholders, including parents, healthcare professionals, and researchers. These outcomes will then be rated for their perceived importance in a two-stage modified Delphi process with the same stakeholders. Finally, a consensus meeting will be held to establish the final core outcome set (COS).
Conclusion: The impact of brace treatment on the family is profound, but seldom considered in randomized controlled trials. This COS can independently standardize reporting on the family's experience, and potentially become part of a broader COS for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants undergoing brace treatment.
{"title":"Development of a family-centred core outcome set for infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip treated with a brace.","authors":"Joanna Craven, Olivia O'Malley, Daniel C Perry","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0186","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to define a set of family-centred core outcomes for infants undergoing brace treatment to facilitate consistent reporting for future high-quality research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Family-centred outcomes will be identified through a literature review and a scoping survey involving key stakeholders, including parents, healthcare professionals, and researchers. These outcomes will then be rated for their perceived importance in a two-stage modified Delphi process with the same stakeholders. Finally, a consensus meeting will be held to establish the final core outcome set (COS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The impact of brace treatment on the family is profound, but seldom considered in randomized controlled trials. This COS can independently standardize reporting on the family's experience, and potentially become part of a broader COS for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants undergoing brace treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"21-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698604/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}