Pub Date : 2021-05-19DOI: 10.46715/IJDE2021.06.1000114
Abu Ansar Md. Rizwan
Introduction: Menstruation is the normal and regular process for every woman. It can affect both physical and mental status of the women. The main thing of menstrual period is personal hygiene maintenance. Improper management of personal hygiene maintains can causes infectious disease and causes severe gynecological problems. In Bangladesh, most of the adolescent girls cannot ask any question about their physiological changes to their mother or relative because of their shyness and social stigma. Good hygiene management during menstruation can increase personal confidence, while inadequate management can lead to mentally depression and also hamper in their daily activities. This study was aimed to assess the practice on personal hygiene maintenance during menstruation period among school girls in selected schools of Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive type of study was carried out in three randomly selected schools in Dhaka city of Bangladesh with 384 systematic randomly selected adolescent girls. The data were collected from the respondents using semi-structured questionnaire by face-to-face interview, after taking verbal consent form the participants and written consent from their parents and school authority. Data entry and analysis were done by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software version 20 for the analysis. The anonymity and confidentiality of the respondents were maintained strictly and study participants were informed that they can be able to leave the study at any stage of data collection. Findings: The finding reported that nearly 80% (79%) of the respondent use sanitary napkin and among the non-users, 95.2 percent (77) use piece of cloths. The majority (66%) of the respondents change napkin/other materials after 4 hours and 90% take genital care regularly. Almost all (99.5%) the respondents take bath regularly and 99.5 percent wash their hand with soap and water. About 98 percent used to wear clean dresses and 94.5 percent normally take healthy food. Using sanitary napkin was found to be associated with age, parent’s income whereas it was not associated with mother’s educational level. Conclusion: Awareness regarding the need for information about good menstrual practices is very important and should be given to enhance the good level of knowledge and practices. Mass media should also emphasize on health information about menstrual hygiene. Therefore, policy makers and stakeholders should take necessary initiatives to setup health education program to create awareness and practice of good menstrual hygiene among the adolescents. Keywords: Menstrual Hygiene; School Girls; Practice; Dhaka
{"title":"Practice on Personal Hygiene Maintenance during Menstruation Cycle among School Girls in Dhaka City, Bangladesh","authors":"Abu Ansar Md. Rizwan","doi":"10.46715/IJDE2021.06.1000114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46715/IJDE2021.06.1000114","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Menstruation is the normal and regular process for every woman. It can affect both physical and mental status of the women. The main thing of menstrual period is personal hygiene maintenance. Improper management of personal hygiene maintains can causes infectious disease and causes severe gynecological problems. In Bangladesh, most of the adolescent girls cannot ask any question about their physiological changes to their mother or relative because of their shyness and social stigma. Good hygiene management during menstruation can increase personal confidence, while inadequate management can lead to mentally depression and also hamper in their daily activities. This study was aimed to assess the practice on personal hygiene maintenance during menstruation period among school girls in selected schools of Dhaka city, Bangladesh.\u0000\u0000Methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive type of study was carried out in three randomly selected schools in Dhaka city of Bangladesh with 384 systematic randomly selected adolescent girls. The data were collected from the respondents using semi-structured questionnaire by face-to-face interview, after taking verbal consent form the participants and written consent from their parents and school authority. Data entry and analysis were done by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software version 20 for the analysis. The anonymity and confidentiality of the respondents were maintained strictly and study participants were informed that they can be able to leave the study at any stage of data collection. \u0000\u0000Findings: The finding reported that nearly 80% (79%) of the respondent use sanitary napkin and among the non-users, 95.2 percent (77) use piece of cloths. The majority (66%) of the respondents change napkin/other materials after 4 hours and 90% take genital care regularly. Almost all (99.5%) the respondents take bath regularly and 99.5 percent wash their hand with soap and water. About 98 percent used to wear clean dresses and 94.5 percent normally take healthy food. Using sanitary napkin was found to be associated with age, parent’s income whereas it was not associated with mother’s educational level.\u0000\u0000Conclusion: Awareness regarding the need for information about good menstrual practices is very important and should be given to enhance the good level of knowledge and practices. Mass media should also emphasize on health information about menstrual hygiene. Therefore, policy makers and stakeholders should take necessary initiatives to setup health education program to create awareness and practice of good menstrual hygiene among the adolescents.\u0000\u0000Keywords: Menstrual Hygiene; School Girls; Practice; Dhaka","PeriodicalId":341642,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Digital Evidence","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128415757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-26DOI: 10.46715/IJDE2021.02.1000110
G. Adams
Introduction: Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics are thought to affect the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus including gut dysbiosis, intestinal barrier permeability and modulator of gut-brain axis and oxidative stress. This systematic review examined if their interventions resulted in improved clinical outcomes and were safe to administer. Methods: An electronic search was conducted in August 2020 of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PUBMED databases as well as using Google Scholar using keyword searches combined in a formal search strategy. The studies extracted were then filtered through an inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed for risk of bias. Results: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with 20 studies involving participants with type 2 diabetes, 1 study a mixed cohort of type 1 and 2, and 3 involving prediabetes participants. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to the heterogeneity in populations, methods and presented results. One trial was limited due to unclear risk of bias and was excluded. Four key themes were identified across the studies: improvements to glycaemic control; improvements in oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability; lipid profile, anthropometric parameters and blood pressure; and adverse events and tolerability. Conclusions: Probiotics improved glycaemic control, oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability and lipid profile in T2DM participants. There was no evidence of improvements to T1DM due to lack of studies and insufficient studies on pre-diabetes. Synbiotics are also promising but prebiotics have insufficient evidence.
{"title":"The Benefits and Risks of Probiotic, Prebiotic and Symbiotic interventions in the Care of patients with Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"G. Adams","doi":"10.46715/IJDE2021.02.1000110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46715/IJDE2021.02.1000110","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics are thought to affect the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus including gut dysbiosis, intestinal barrier permeability and modulator of gut-brain axis and oxidative stress. This systematic review examined if their interventions resulted in improved clinical outcomes and were safe to administer. Methods: An electronic search was conducted in August 2020 of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PUBMED databases as well as using Google Scholar using keyword searches combined in a formal search strategy. The studies extracted were then filtered through an inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed for risk of bias. Results: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with 20 studies involving participants with type 2 diabetes, 1 study a mixed cohort of type 1 and 2, and 3 involving prediabetes participants. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to the heterogeneity in populations, methods and presented results. One trial was limited due to unclear risk of bias and was excluded. Four key themes were identified across the studies: improvements to glycaemic control; improvements in oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability; lipid profile, anthropometric parameters and blood pressure; and adverse events and tolerability. Conclusions: Probiotics improved glycaemic control, oxidative stress, inflammation and gut permeability and lipid profile in T2DM participants. There was no evidence of improvements to T1DM due to lack of studies and insufficient studies on pre-diabetes. Synbiotics are also promising but prebiotics have insufficient evidence.","PeriodicalId":341642,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Digital Evidence","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130420751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-23DOI: 10.46715/ijde2020.11.1000108
Sumon Rahman Chowdhur
The prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) continues to escalate at an alarming rate and diabetes has become the most common single cause of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) in the world. This is because diabetes, particularly type 2, is increasing in prevalence, and the patients are living longer now. Diabetes is the major cause of end-stage renal disease in the developed world, accounting for 40% to 50% of cases. Diabetic nephropathy contributes significantly to the economic burden of diabetes. In UK, the cost of diabetic complications in 2011/2012 was estimated at £14 billion, by 2035/2036 this is expected to rise to £22 billion. Worldwide, healthcare costs for diabetic patients are much higher than non- diabetic patients. Also, among diabetic patients the cost of health care is much higher in those with complications (Micro < Macro