Understanding vascularity and assessing the risk of post-traumatic avascular necrosis are crucial for predicting outcomes and identifying optimal treatment options in proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). Until now, Hertel et al have been the only researchers to evaluate the intraoperative perfusion of the humeral head after fracture using Doppler flowmetry in a central single drill hole within the head. This pilot study aims to standardize the evaluation of intraoperative perfusion measurements in different areas of the humeral head in patients with PHF.
In this prospective pilot study, intraoperative semiquantitative Doppler perfusion measurements were conducted during plate osteosynthesis for PHF treatment in our institution between July 2021 and May 2022. The fracture morphology was classified radiologically according to Resch's criteria. Quality of reduction was determined postoperatively to be either anatomical, minor malreduced, or major malreduced according to Peters et al in conventional and computed tomography examinations. Medial hinge integrity and medial metaphyseal extension were assessed radiographically according to Hertel et al. Intraoperatively, after drilling screw holes through the plate, a Doppler probe was inserted through all nine drill holes on the humeral head and at least one on the humeral shaft to successively measure the presence of a pulse to indicate if perfusion is present.
A total of ten patients (mean age 59 years, range, 36–83) with a humeral head fracture (2 × 2GL, 3 × 3G, 2 × 4G, 2 × 4GL, 1 × 5aG according to Resch) were included. Nine of the ten patients showed a pulse signal on the humeral shaft. Overall, pulse-synchronous perfusion was detected using Doppler sonography in at least one hole in the humeral head of all patients. In patients with an intact medial hinge (N = 6), pulse-synchronous perfusion could be measured in almost twice as many humeral head holes on average (5.7 vs. 3.0 drill holes) compared to patients with a dislocated medial hinge (N = 4). In patients with metaphyseal extension (N = 3), pulse-synchronous perfusion was measured in an average of 6.7 humeral head holes compared to 3.7 holes in patients without metaphyseal extension (N = 7).
Semiquantitative, intraoperative Doppler flowmetry offers a noninvasive and rapid assessment of humeral perfusion which allows an understanding of humeral head perfusion, when used in a standardized fashion to measure flow in different areas of the humeral head.
Suture anchors have been used in surgical repair of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. While some reports indicate favorable results, others emphasize less promising outcomes. This case series reports our experience with suture anchors for surgical treatment of ACJ dislocation.
Clinical and radiographic outcomes in three patients treated operatively for ACJ dislocations were reviewed. In all patients, two suture anchors were inserted in the coracoid (unicortical) and #5 nonabsorbable suture from the suture anchor was shuttled through drill holes in the clavicle and tied over two button devices. The coracoclavicular ligaments were reconstructed using a figure of eight semitendinosus allograft around the coracoid and clavicle. Postoperatively, sling immobilization was used for 6 weeks, and physical therapy was initiated at 6 weeks with contact activity allowed at 6 months.
Three male patients underwent treatment for Rockwood type 3 (chronic; n = 1) and type 5 (n = 2) ACJ dislocations. Loss of reduction was noted within 6 weeks postoperatively. Two patients exhibited failure due to complete suture anchor pullout and the third patient had partial pull out of one of the anchors. Additionally, the third patient also suffered a coracoid fracture adjacent to the anchor’s placement after sustaining direct trauma to his shoulder, one-year postoperatively.
In our case series, we found a high rate of fixation failure and early loss of reduction with the use of suture anchors for the treatment of ACJ dislocation. These findings should be taken into consideration when selecting an appropriate implant for fixation of ACJ dislocation.
The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool is a 10-item multidimensional screening tool utilized to evaluate pain-related psychological traits in individuals with musculoskeletal pain conditions. The validity of postoperatively collected OSPRO-YF is unclear. This study sought to assess validity of the OSPRO-YF by comparing it to patient-reported outcome scores in both preoperative and postoperative settings.
The authors hypothesized that OSPRO-YF overall score would correlate with shoulder and global function PROs at preoperative and postoperative timepoints.
A review of 101 patients undergoing shoulder surgery by one sports medicine orthopedic surgeon at a large academic institution was conducted. 90 and 54 patients had complete preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome responses. OSPRO-YF, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Evaluation Form, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-CAT) were routinely administered before and after surgery at the senior author’s clinic visits. Concurrent validity of OSPRO-YF at either timepoint was assessed by comparing scores with PROs cross-sectionally using Pearson correlations and multiple comparison corrections.
Preoperatively, higher OSPRO-YF total score was associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; P < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; P = .05) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; P < .01). Higher postoperative OSPRO-YF was also associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; P < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; P < .01) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; P = .01). ASES had strong correlation with Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and Pain scores at both preoperative and postoperative timepoints. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation was not significantly associated with OSPRO-YF total score or number of yellow flags at either timepoints.
The study findings support the clinical validity of the 10-item OSPRO-YF tool when administered before or after shoulder surgery. For patients exhibiting suboptimal recovery or those identified as high risk at initial screening, assessment of pain-related psychological distress postoperatively may be particularly beneficial in guiding rehabilitation.