Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.012
Ji Un Kim MD , Ji Young Yoon MD , Young Dae Jeon MD , Hyung Ki Cho MD , Hyeon Jang Jeong MD, PhD , Joo Han Oh MD, PhD
Background
We compared the clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) in patients with massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) without osteoarthritis (OA), secondary rTSA in patients with failed rotator cuff repair (RCR), and primary rTSA in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) as a control group.
Methods
Among 364 patients who underwent rTSA between March 2014 and August 2019, 153 were included. All patients underwent surgery with a single implant type and were followed for a minimum of 4 years. Patients were categorized into three groups: primary rTSA for mRCT without OA (mRCT group, n = 24), primary rTSA for CTA (CTA group, n = 104), and rTSA for failed rotator cuff repair group (fRCR; fRCR group, n = 25). The mean age was 71.5 ± 6.3 (range, 53-83) years, with a mean follow-up of 54.7 ± 12.9 (range, 48-98) months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the active range of motion, the visual analog scale for pain, the simple shoulder test, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and the Constant score at the final follow-up.
Results
All functional outcomes significantly improved postoperatively in each group (P < .05). However, the fRCR group presented worse outcomes compared to the other groups, including visual analog scale for pain (2.1 ± 0.5), forward flexion (126° ± 4°), external rotation (42 ± 4°), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (76 ± 5), and Constant score (55 ± 3) (P < .05). Postoperative complications and radiologic outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (P = .890).
Conclusion
Considering the worse clinical outcomes of secondary rTSA after failed RCR compared to primary rTSA for mRCT without OA and/or CTA, careful selection of appropriate candidates for RCR or primary rTSA as a treatment option for mRCT without OA is essential, according to their healing potential.
{"title":"Clinical outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (comprehensive system) after failed rotator cuff repair with a medium-term follow-up: comparison with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tear without osteoarthritis","authors":"Ji Un Kim MD , Ji Young Yoon MD , Young Dae Jeon MD , Hyung Ki Cho MD , Hyeon Jang Jeong MD, PhD , Joo Han Oh MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We compared the clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) in patients with massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) without osteoarthritis (OA), secondary rTSA in patients with failed rotator cuff repair (RCR), and primary rTSA in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) as a control group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Among 364 patients who underwent rTSA between March 2014 and August 2019, 153 were included. All patients underwent surgery with a single implant type and were followed for a minimum of 4 years. Patients were categorized into three groups: primary rTSA for mRCT without OA (mRCT group, n = 24), primary rTSA for CTA (CTA group, n = 104), and rTSA for failed rotator cuff repair group (fRCR; fRCR group, n = 25). The mean age was 71.5 ± 6.3 (range, 53-83) years, with a mean follow-up of 54.7 ± 12.9 (range, 48-98) months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the active range of motion, the visual analog scale for pain, the simple shoulder test, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and the Constant score at the final follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All functional outcomes significantly improved postoperatively in each group (<em>P</em> < .05). However, the fRCR group presented worse outcomes compared to the other groups, including visual analog scale for pain (2.1 ± 0.5), forward flexion (126° ± 4°), external rotation (42 ± 4°), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (76 ± 5), and Constant score (55 ± 3) (<em>P</em> < .05). Postoperative complications and radiologic outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (<em>P</em> = .890).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Considering the worse clinical outcomes of secondary rTSA after failed RCR compared to primary rTSA for mRCT without OA and/or CTA, careful selection of appropriate candidates for RCR or primary rTSA as a treatment option for mRCT without OA is essential, according to their healing potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2081-2086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.010
Kevin C. Liu MD, Justin T. Jabara MD, Miguel A. Lizarraga BS, Andrew P. Gatto DO, Brian Feeley MD
Background
Cefazolin is the primary antibiotic used for prevention of shoulder arthroplasty (SA) infection. However, vancomycin, clindamycin, and doxycycline may be used, specifically for patients with penicillin allergies or known bacterial colonization. Due to limited existing data, the aim of this systematic review was to characterize contemporary antibiotic prophylaxis choices and report infection rates based on the prophylactic regimen in patients undergoing SA.
Methods
The online databases CINAHL Complete, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to September 25, 2024. Clinical studies comparing preoperative antibiotic regimens and reporting postoperative complications were included. Nonrandomized and randomized studies were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool and the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, respectively.
Results
The search strategy identified 7 eligible studies, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 5 were retrospective series, including 33,159 procedures (hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and humeral head arthroplasty). The most commonly used antibiotic was cefazolin. All-cause infection rates ranged from 1.0%-1.1% for cefazolin, 1.1%-2.4% for vancomycin, and 3.2%-4.1% for clindamycin. One randomized controlled trial found no significant reduction in intraoperative culture positivity rates with the addition of doxycycline to cefazolin.
Conclusion
Cefazolin is the preferred antibiotic prophylaxis for SA, with vancomycin and clindamycin as viable alternatives. Future investigations could evaluate the benefit of dual antibiotic therapy and develop evidence-based treatment algorithms for high-risk patients who may require non–cefazolin prophylaxis.
背景:头孢唑林是用于预防肩关节置换术(SA)感染的主要抗生素。然而,万古霉素、克林霉素和强力霉素可以使用,特别是对青霉素过敏或已知细菌定植的患者。由于现有数据有限,本系统综述的目的是描述当代抗生素预防选择,并报告基于预防方案的SA患者感染率。方法检索自建库至2024年9月25日的在线数据库CINAHL Complete、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials和Web of Science。临床研究比较术前抗生素方案和报告术后并发症。非随机研究和随机研究分别使用非随机研究方法学指数(Methodological Index for non - random studies)和修订后的Cochrane Risk of Bias 2工具进行评估。结果检索策略确定了7项符合条件的研究,其中2项为随机对照试验,5项为回顾性研究,包括33,159例手术(半关节置换术、解剖性全肩关节置换术、反向全肩关节置换术和肱骨头置换术)。最常用的抗生素是头孢唑林。头孢唑林的全因感染率为1.0% ~ 1.1%,万古霉素为1.1% ~ 2.4%,克林霉素为3.2% ~ 4.1%。一项随机对照试验发现,在头孢唑林中加入强力霉素后,术中培养阳性率没有显著降低。结论头孢唑林是预防SA的首选抗生素,万古霉素和克林霉素是可行的选择。未来的研究可以评估双重抗生素治疗的益处,并为可能需要非头孢唑林预防的高危患者制定循证治疗算法。
{"title":"Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in primary shoulder arthroplasty patients: a systematic review","authors":"Kevin C. Liu MD, Justin T. Jabara MD, Miguel A. Lizarraga BS, Andrew P. Gatto DO, Brian Feeley MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cefazolin is the primary antibiotic used for prevention of shoulder arthroplasty (SA) infection. However, vancomycin, clindamycin, and doxycycline may be used, specifically for patients with penicillin allergies or known bacterial colonization. Due to limited existing data, the aim of this systematic review was to characterize contemporary antibiotic prophylaxis choices and report infection rates based on the prophylactic regimen in patients undergoing SA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The online databases CINAHL Complete, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to September 25, 2024. Clinical studies comparing preoperative antibiotic regimens and reporting postoperative complications were included. Nonrandomized and randomized studies were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool and the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search strategy identified 7 eligible studies, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 5 were retrospective series, including 33,159 procedures (hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and humeral head arthroplasty). The most commonly used antibiotic was cefazolin. All-cause infection rates ranged from 1.0%-1.1% for cefazolin, 1.1%-2.4% for vancomycin, and 3.2%-4.1% for clindamycin. One randomized controlled trial found no significant reduction in intraoperative culture positivity rates with the addition of doxycycline to cefazolin.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cefazolin is the preferred antibiotic prophylaxis for SA, with vancomycin and clindamycin as viable alternatives. Future investigations could evaluate the benefit of dual antibiotic therapy and develop evidence-based treatment algorithms for high-risk patients who may require non–cefazolin prophylaxis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2062-2068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.038
Keigo Honoki MD , Jarret Woodmass MD , Sarah Harris BSc Eng , Afsana Hasan MD , Rodrigo Brandariz MD , Peter MacDonald MD
Background
Although procedures for long head of biceps (LHB), including LHB tenotomy and tenodesis, are commonly performed for patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT), the data about concomitant biceps procedures in the treatment of partial-thickness (PT) RCT has been limited.
Methods
Retrospective data were provided by the institutional Pan Am Clinic Orthopedic Surgery registry. The single surgical center collects surgeon- and patient-reported data for all arthroscopic surgeries as standard of care. Patients who underwent shoulder surgery for PT-RCT between April 2019 and August 2022 were included in this study. All patients were eligible for 1-year follow-up. Demographic, operative, and patient-reported outcomes were compared for patients treated with and without concomitant LHB intervention. Subanalyses compared patients treated with biceps tenotomy and biceps tenodesis. Operative data included LHB and RCT condition at the time of surgery, and outcomes included revision status, complications and the patient-reported outcomes American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. Continuous variables were compared using a two-sided independent t-test, and categorical variables were compared using a chi-squared or Fisher's exact test.
Results
The rate of LHB pathology including inflammation, partial tear, or rupture associated with PT-RCT was 58% (n = 66/113). Fifty-six percent (n = 63/113) of the patients treated for partial supraspinatus tendon tear underwent concomitant LHB intervention (Group I), and 44% (n = 50/113) did not undergo LHB intervention (Group N). The mean age of study patients was 54 years (standard deviation = 12), and 37% were female (male n = 71; female n = 42). Within Group I, 48% (n = 30/63) underwent tenotomy and 52% (n = 33/63) underwent tenodesis. LHB condition at the time of surgery was different between Group N and Group I (Fisher's exact P < .001) and between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups (Fisher's exact P < .001). No other significant differences were found in operative variables or patient-reported variables preoperatively or at the 1-year follow-up.
Conclusion
Concomitant biceps intervention does not affect the clinical outcome in arthroscopic shoulder surgery for PT-RCT. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between LHB tenodesis and tenotomy in the treatment of arthroscopic PT-RCT when LHB intervention was performed.
{"title":"Concomitant biceps intervention does not affect the outcome in the treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tear","authors":"Keigo Honoki MD , Jarret Woodmass MD , Sarah Harris BSc Eng , Afsana Hasan MD , Rodrigo Brandariz MD , Peter MacDonald MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.038","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.038","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although procedures for long head of biceps (LHB), including LHB tenotomy and tenodesis, are commonly performed for patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT), the data about concomitant biceps procedures in the treatment of partial-thickness (PT) RCT has been limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective data were provided by the institutional Pan Am Clinic Orthopedic Surgery registry. The single surgical center collects surgeon- and patient-reported data for all arthroscopic surgeries as standard of care. Patients who underwent shoulder surgery for PT-RCT between April 2019 and August 2022 were included in this study. All patients were eligible for 1-year follow-up. Demographic, operative, and patient-reported outcomes were compared for patients treated with and without concomitant LHB intervention. Subanalyses compared patients treated with biceps tenotomy and biceps tenodesis. Operative data included LHB and RCT condition at the time of surgery, and outcomes included revision status, complications and the patient-reported outcomes American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. Continuous variables were compared using a two-sided independent <em>t</em>-test, and categorical variables were compared using a chi-squared or Fisher's exact test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The rate of LHB pathology including inflammation, partial tear, or rupture associated with PT-RCT was 58% (n = 66/113). Fifty-six percent (n = 63/113) of the patients treated for partial supraspinatus tendon tear underwent concomitant LHB intervention (Group I), and 44% (n = 50/113) did not undergo LHB intervention (Group N). The mean age of study patients was 54 years (standard deviation = 12), and 37% were female (male n = 71; female n = 42). Within Group I, 48% (n = 30/63) underwent tenotomy and 52% (n = 33/63) underwent tenodesis. LHB condition at the time of surgery was different between Group N and Group I (Fisher's exact <em>P</em> < .001) and between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups (Fisher's exact <em>P</em> < .001). No other significant differences were found in operative variables or patient-reported variables preoperatively or at the 1-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Concomitant biceps intervention does not affect the clinical outcome in arthroscopic shoulder surgery for PT-RCT. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between LHB tenodesis and tenotomy in the treatment of arthroscopic PT-RCT when LHB intervention was performed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 1994-1998"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.007
Braeden R. Gooch BS , Josh W. Thibeault BS , Charles R. Reiter BS , Matthew S. Smith MD , Joshua C. Setliff MD , John W. Cyrus MS , James R. Satalich MD , J. Brett Goodloe MD , Jennifer L. Vanderbeck MD
Background
The coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular injuries is performed through a variety of surgical techniques and fixation methods. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk factors associated with failure of CC reconstruction, regardless of the fixation method used.
Methods
A systematic review was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched through November 2024 for studies analyzing the failures of CC reconstructive surgery. Studies that quantified risk factors for CC reconstruction failure were included.
Results
Seven studies comprising 781 CC reconstructions were analyzed with an overall failure rate of 19.1%. Clavicle tunnel malposition in anatomic reconstructions was the most cited risk factor for failure. Position was defined as either the distance from the lateral aspect of the clavicle to the tunnels or as a ratio between this distance and the length of the clavicle. Three studies cited increased failure risk with medial malposition of the conoid or trapezoid tunnels. Specific parameters included conoid tunnel ratio >0.25, (odds ratio (OR) = 5.67), trapezoid ratio >0.15 (OR = 4.2), conoid tunnel >47 mm (OR = 4.67), and trapezoid tunnel >24 mm (OR = 4.2). Lateral conoid tunnel malposition with a conoid tunnel ratio <0.20 (OR = 40) was also noted to increase failure risk. Another study identified increased risk of failure when surgeons use tunnel ratios instead of tunnel distance in mm intraoperatively (OR = 4.609). Placement of a lateral coracoid button, as opposed to a central button, was cited in 2 studies as significant risk factors (OR = 9.614, 13.87). Other risk factors included osteoporosis (OR = 8.652), weight-bearing before 6 weeks from surgery (OR = 6.4), surgery >6 weeks from initial injury (OR = 2.65), osteolysis (OR = 4.386), patient age >40 (OR = 3.14), and open reconstruction (OR = 4.25).
Conclusions
Conoid and trapezoid tunnel malposition, both medially and laterally, were significantly associated with an increased risk of failure. Additionally, patient age, osteoporosis, osteolysis, time to weight bearing after surgery, delayed presentation of more than 6 weeks from initial injury, should be considered when considering surgical intervention.
{"title":"Risk factors for coracoclavicular reconstruction failure: a systematic review","authors":"Braeden R. Gooch BS , Josh W. Thibeault BS , Charles R. Reiter BS , Matthew S. Smith MD , Joshua C. Setliff MD , John W. Cyrus MS , James R. Satalich MD , J. Brett Goodloe MD , Jennifer L. Vanderbeck MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular injuries is performed through a variety of surgical techniques and fixation methods. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk factors associated with failure of CC reconstruction, regardless of the fixation method used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched through November 2024 for studies analyzing the failures of CC reconstructive surgery. Studies that quantified risk factors for CC reconstruction failure were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven studies comprising 781 CC reconstructions were analyzed with an overall failure rate of 19.1%. Clavicle tunnel malposition in anatomic reconstructions was the most cited risk factor for failure. Position was defined as either the distance from the lateral aspect of the clavicle to the tunnels or as a ratio between this distance and the length of the clavicle. Three studies cited increased failure risk with medial malposition of the conoid or trapezoid tunnels. Specific parameters included conoid tunnel ratio >0.25, (odds ratio (OR) = 5.67), trapezoid ratio >0.15 (OR = 4.2), conoid tunnel >47 mm (OR = 4.67), and trapezoid tunnel >24 mm (OR = 4.2). Lateral conoid tunnel malposition with a conoid tunnel ratio <0.20 (OR = 40) was also noted to increase failure risk. Another study identified increased risk of failure when surgeons use tunnel ratios instead of tunnel distance in mm intraoperatively (OR = 4.609). Placement of a lateral coracoid button, as opposed to a central button, was cited in 2 studies as significant risk factors (OR = 9.614, 13.87). Other risk factors included osteoporosis (OR = 8.652), weight-bearing before 6 weeks from surgery (OR = 6.4), surgery >6 weeks from initial injury (OR = 2.65), osteolysis (OR = 4.386), patient age >40 (OR = 3.14), and open reconstruction (OR = 4.25).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Conoid and trapezoid tunnel malposition, both medially and laterally, were significantly associated with an increased risk of failure. Additionally, patient age, osteoporosis, osteolysis, time to weight bearing after surgery, delayed presentation of more than 6 weeks from initial injury, should be considered when considering surgical intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 1965-1971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004
Joseph Adams , Samer Al-Humadi MD , Brian C. Werner MD , Philipp Moroder MD , Patric Raiss MD , Asheesh Bedi MD , Evan Lederman MD , Justin Griffin MD
Background
Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and orientation relative to anatomic scapular landmarks and postoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM following rTSA.
Methods
A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on primary rTSAs performed with a 135° humeral inlay component and a lateralized glenoid component between November 2016 and March 2022. Surgeries performed with a 3D plan and patient-specific transfer instrumentation with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included. Implant position was extracted from preoperative planning software, focusing on pin position (center of the glenosphere) and glenosphere diameter, version, and overhang relative to scapular anatomic landmarks. ROM and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were assessed at 2-year follow-up, with linear regression models utilized to analyze the relationships between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for confounding variables.
Results
A total of 75 rTSAs met the study criteria. For every 1 millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter, there was a 0.5 spinal level decrease in internal rotation (IR) spine (P ≤ .005) and a 2.5° decrease in forward flexion (P ≤ .005). For every 4° increase in baseplate retroversion, there was a 1 spinal level improvement in IR spine (P = .009). Superior tilt of the baseplate was associated with a decrease in internal rotation at 90° of abduction (3° decrease per 1° of increased superior tilt, P ≤ .001). ASES scores were also significantly affected, with a 3.5 point decrease per millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter (P ≤ .001), but improved by a 1 point per millimeter increase in pin-to-coracoid distance (P = .015).
Conclusion
In patients with 3D planning and patient-specific instrumentation, smaller glenosphere diameter, increased baseplate retroversion, and avoidance of superior tilt improve IR after rTSA performed with a 135° humeral component and lateralized glenoid. A smaller glenosphere diameter and increased distance from the coracoid also improved ASES scores. This data suggests that with the use of a lateralized glenoid in rTSA, efforts should be made to increase the glenosphere distance from the coracoid, avoid a superior tilted positioning of the baseplate, and consider a smaller glenosphere when in between sizes.
背景:在反向肩关节置换术(rTSA)中,关节盂的最佳位置是影响术后活动范围(ROM)的关键因素,但仍是一个正在进行的研究课题。本研究的目的是评估相对于解剖性肩胛骨地标的三维(3D)关节盂位置和方向与rTSA术后患者报告的预后和ROM之间的关系。方法回顾性多中心队列研究了2016年11月至2022年3月期间采用135°肱骨内嵌假体和侧化肩关节假体进行的原发性rTSAs。采用3D计划和患者特异性转移器械进行的手术,并进行至少2年的临床随访。从术前计划软件中提取植入物位置,重点关注针位置(盂内球中心)以及盂内球直径、版本和相对于肩胛骨解剖标志的悬垂。随访2年,评估ROM和美国肩肘外科医生(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, ASES)评分,利用线性回归模型分析术前和术中变量与术后结果之间的关系,同时调整混杂变量。结果75例rtsa符合研究标准。关节盂直径每增加1毫米,内旋(IR)脊柱水平降低0.5°(P≤0.005),前屈脊柱水平降低2.5°(P≤0.005)。底板后倾每增加4°,IR脊柱水平提高1个(P = 0.009)。在外展90°时,基底板的高度倾斜与内旋减少有关(每增加高度倾斜1°,内旋减少3°,P≤0.001)。as评分也受到显著影响,关节球直径每增加一毫米降低3.5分(P≤0.001),但针到喙的距离每增加一毫米提高1分(P = 0.015)。结论在采用3D计划和患者特异性内固定的患者中,较小的盂内球直径、增加的基底板后倾和避免过度倾斜可改善135°肱骨假体和侧化盂内关节行rTSA后的IR。较小的关节球直径和与喙的距离增加也提高了ase评分。该数据提示,在rTSA中使用侧化盂骨时,应努力增加盂骨距喙的距离,避免基底板的过度倾斜定位,并考虑在两者之间使用较小的盂骨。
{"title":"Smaller glenosphere size and increased baseplate retroversion improve postoperative internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed with a 135° humeral implant and lateralized glenoid","authors":"Joseph Adams , Samer Al-Humadi MD , Brian C. Werner MD , Philipp Moroder MD , Patric Raiss MD , Asheesh Bedi MD , Evan Lederman MD , Justin Griffin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and orientation relative to anatomic scapular landmarks and postoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM following rTSA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on primary rTSAs performed with a 135° humeral inlay component and a lateralized glenoid component between November 2016 and March 2022. Surgeries performed with a 3D plan and patient-specific transfer instrumentation with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included. Implant position was extracted from preoperative planning software, focusing on pin position (center of the glenosphere) and glenosphere diameter, version, and overhang relative to scapular anatomic landmarks. ROM and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were assessed at 2-year follow-up, with linear regression models utilized to analyze the relationships between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for confounding variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 75 rTSAs met the study criteria. For every 1 millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter, there was a 0.5 spinal level decrease in internal rotation (IR) spine (<em>P</em> ≤ .005) and a 2.5° decrease in forward flexion (<em>P</em> ≤ .005). For every 4° increase in baseplate retroversion, there was a 1 spinal level improvement in IR spine (<em>P</em> = .009). Superior tilt of the baseplate was associated with a decrease in internal rotation at 90° of abduction (3° decrease per 1° of increased superior tilt, <em>P</em> ≤ .001). ASES scores were also significantly affected, with a 3.5 point decrease per millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter (<em>P</em> ≤ .001), but improved by a 1 point per millimeter increase in pin-to-coracoid distance (<em>P</em> = .015).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with 3D planning and patient-specific instrumentation, smaller glenosphere diameter, increased baseplate retroversion, and avoidance of superior tilt improve IR after rTSA performed with a 135° humeral component and lateralized glenoid. A smaller glenosphere diameter and increased distance from the coracoid also improved ASES scores. This data suggests that with the use of a lateralized glenoid in rTSA, efforts should be made to increase the glenosphere distance from the coracoid, avoid a superior tilted positioning of the baseplate, and consider a smaller glenosphere when in between sizes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2037-2043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.008
Christian Spross MD , Michael Strässle MD , Jesse Jupiter MD , Roger van Riet MD , Alberto G. Schneeberger MD , Andrew Choo MD , Denise Eygendaal MD, PhD , Kutalmis Albayrak MD , Jonas Grossmann PhD , Vilijam Zdravkovic MD , Bernhard Jost MD
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Complex proximal ulna fracture dislocations include Monteggia-like fractures and transolecranon fracture dislocations. Since 2011, we introduced a structured classification and treatment algorithm for these fractures in a Swiss teaching hospital, considering ligamentous structures, the coronoid process, and the radial head. This classification, named the Montecranon classification (MC), was validated by users with varying experience levels through a retrospective clinical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients treated for a complex proximal ulnar fracture dislocation between 2011 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Fractures were classified according to the Bado, Jupiter, Mayo, and the new MC.</div><div>For the clinical study, patients treated according to the MC were retrospectively analyzed including final range of motion, EuroQol 5-Dimensions-5-Levels Score, Quick DASH, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, analysis of complications/revisions, and radiographic assessment for posttraumatic arthritis. Patients included had at least one year of clinical and radiographic follow-up.</div><div>For validation, 22 randomly selected cases were sent to 4 elbow experts, 3 young consultants, and 3 novice doctors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 43 patients (mean 55 years, range: 19-87) who suffered a complex proximal ulnar fracture dislocation, 30 patients met the inclusion criteria. Four patients (13%) had a transolecranon fracture dislocation, and 26 patients (87%) had a Monteggia-like fracture. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range: 1-10). At the final follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 126° (range: 40-155), the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 93 points (range: 70-100), and the mean qDASH was 19 points (range: 0-82). A total of 21 patients (70%) needed a secondary surgery after a mean of 364 days (range: 7-883). Whereof, hardware removal was performed in 12 (57%) patients. A significant correlation was found between decreased final range of motion and higher grade of MC fracture type.</div><div>The interobserver correlation for MC was moderate for novice doctors and young consultants (kappa = 0.63 and 0.55) and poor for elbow experts (0.47). The intraobserver correlation was moderate to good in all groups (kappa = 0.76, 0.53, and 0.76). All participants found the MC helpful (22%) to very helpful (78%) for understanding the fracture and planning ORIF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The MC with special attention to involvement of ligamentous structures, the coronoid process, and the radial head, as well as an associated structured reduction technique, is helpful for the management of complex proximal ulna fracture dislocations. Despite the high rate of secondary surgeries, the final clinical outcome may lead to good to excellent results in 90% of the cases. However, young surgeons with less experience seemed to profit more from this classification than experts.<
{"title":"The Montecranon classification—a comprehensive treatment strategy for complex proximal ulna fracture dislocations","authors":"Christian Spross MD , Michael Strässle MD , Jesse Jupiter MD , Roger van Riet MD , Alberto G. Schneeberger MD , Andrew Choo MD , Denise Eygendaal MD, PhD , Kutalmis Albayrak MD , Jonas Grossmann PhD , Vilijam Zdravkovic MD , Bernhard Jost MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Complex proximal ulna fracture dislocations include Monteggia-like fractures and transolecranon fracture dislocations. Since 2011, we introduced a structured classification and treatment algorithm for these fractures in a Swiss teaching hospital, considering ligamentous structures, the coronoid process, and the radial head. This classification, named the Montecranon classification (MC), was validated by users with varying experience levels through a retrospective clinical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients treated for a complex proximal ulnar fracture dislocation between 2011 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Fractures were classified according to the Bado, Jupiter, Mayo, and the new MC.</div><div>For the clinical study, patients treated according to the MC were retrospectively analyzed including final range of motion, EuroQol 5-Dimensions-5-Levels Score, Quick DASH, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, analysis of complications/revisions, and radiographic assessment for posttraumatic arthritis. Patients included had at least one year of clinical and radiographic follow-up.</div><div>For validation, 22 randomly selected cases were sent to 4 elbow experts, 3 young consultants, and 3 novice doctors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 43 patients (mean 55 years, range: 19-87) who suffered a complex proximal ulnar fracture dislocation, 30 patients met the inclusion criteria. Four patients (13%) had a transolecranon fracture dislocation, and 26 patients (87%) had a Monteggia-like fracture. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range: 1-10). At the final follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 126° (range: 40-155), the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 93 points (range: 70-100), and the mean qDASH was 19 points (range: 0-82). A total of 21 patients (70%) needed a secondary surgery after a mean of 364 days (range: 7-883). Whereof, hardware removal was performed in 12 (57%) patients. A significant correlation was found between decreased final range of motion and higher grade of MC fracture type.</div><div>The interobserver correlation for MC was moderate for novice doctors and young consultants (kappa = 0.63 and 0.55) and poor for elbow experts (0.47). The intraobserver correlation was moderate to good in all groups (kappa = 0.76, 0.53, and 0.76). All participants found the MC helpful (22%) to very helpful (78%) for understanding the fracture and planning ORIF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The MC with special attention to involvement of ligamentous structures, the coronoid process, and the radial head, as well as an associated structured reduction technique, is helpful for the management of complex proximal ulna fracture dislocations. Despite the high rate of secondary surgeries, the final clinical outcome may lead to good to excellent results in 90% of the cases. However, young surgeons with less experience seemed to profit more from this classification than experts.<","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2176-2185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.016
Michael A. Moverman MD, Adrik Da Silva BS, Christopher D. Joyce MD, Peter N. Chalmers MD, Robert Z. Tashjian MD
Background
The purpose of this study was to compare the restoration of humeral head anatomy, as well as 2-year radiographic and functional outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) using a convertible metaphyseal-based short inlay humeral stem and a stemless humeral component.
Methods
All patients between May 2021 and May 2022 that underwent aTSA using a convertible metaphyseal-based short inlay humeral stem by a single surgeon were included and compared to a cohort of patients that underwent stemless aTSA by the same surgeon between February 2019 and October 2020. An intramedullary cutting guide, a large lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) repaired with cerclage wires, and preoperative 3-dimensional planning were utilized in all cases. The restoration of humeral head anatomy was assessed on an AP radiograph of the proximal humerus 2 weeks postoperatively. Functional outcome scores, range of motion, and LTO healing were collected 2-years postoperatively. Calcar stress shielding was assessed on 2-year postoperative radiographs using the Levy classification.
Results
Overall, there were 26 patients (81.3% follow-up) in the stem group and 43 patients (84.3% follow-up) in the stemless group with 2-year follow-up data. All patients (32 stem/51 stemless) were included in the radiographic analysis assessing humeral head restoration. There were no differences in the humeral head height change (P = .733), percent of patients with <5 mm of humeral head height change (P = .52), percent of patients with an acceptable neck shaft angle (>130°) (P = 1), and mean shift in center of rotation (P = .546) between patients that underwent stemmed and stemless aTSA. There were no differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (stem 93.8 ± 9.1; stemless 92.4 ± 10.8; P = .566), visual analog scale pain scores (stem 0.4 ± 1.1; stemless 0.4 ± 0.9; P = .941), or LTO bony union (stem 88.5%; stemless 92.6%; P = .083) between groups 2 years postoperatively. The stem group was found to have greater forward flexion at 2 years (P = .017), but similar external rotation at the side (P = .445) and internal rotation (P = .268). There were no differences in the degree of stress shielding between groups (P = .185).
Conclusions
Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with a convertible metaphyseal-based short inlay humeral stem demonstrates excellent patient-reported functional and radiographic outcomes 2 years postoperatively. No differences in restoration of humeral head anatomy, degree of stress shielding, patient-reported functional outcomes, and osteotomy healing rates were identified between patients undergoing metaphyseal short-stemmed and stemless aTSA.
{"title":"Two-year functional and radiographic outcomes of a convertible metaphyseal-based short humeral stem in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison to stemless humeral components","authors":"Michael A. Moverman MD, Adrik Da Silva BS, Christopher D. Joyce MD, Peter N. Chalmers MD, Robert Z. Tashjian MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the restoration of humeral head anatomy, as well as 2-year radiographic and functional outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) using a convertible metaphyseal-based short inlay humeral stem and a stemless humeral component.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients between May 2021 and May 2022 that underwent aTSA using a convertible metaphyseal-based short inlay humeral stem by a single surgeon were included and compared to a cohort of patients that underwent stemless aTSA by the same surgeon between February 2019 and October 2020. An intramedullary cutting guide, a large lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) repaired with cerclage wires, and preoperative 3-dimensional planning were utilized in all cases. The restoration of humeral head anatomy was assessed on an AP radiograph of the proximal humerus 2 weeks postoperatively. Functional outcome scores, range of motion, and LTO healing were collected 2-years postoperatively. Calcar stress shielding was assessed on 2-year postoperative radiographs using the Levy classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, there were 26 patients (81.3% follow-up) in the stem group and 43 patients (84.3% follow-up) in the stemless group with 2-year follow-up data. All patients (32 stem/51 stemless) were included in the radiographic analysis assessing humeral head restoration. There were no differences in the humeral head height change (<em>P</em> = .733), percent of patients with <5 mm of humeral head height change (<em>P</em> = .52), percent of patients with an acceptable neck shaft angle (>130°) (<em>P</em> = 1), and mean shift in center of rotation (<em>P</em> = .546) between patients that underwent stemmed and stemless aTSA. There were no differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (stem 93.8 ± 9.1; stemless 92.4 ± 10.8; <em>P</em> = .566), visual analog scale pain scores (stem 0.4 ± 1.1; stemless 0.4 ± 0.9; <em>P</em> = .941), or LTO bony union (stem 88.5%; stemless 92.6%; <em>P</em> = .083) between groups 2 years postoperatively. The stem group was found to have greater forward flexion at 2 years (<em>P</em> = .017), but similar external rotation at the side (<em>P</em> = .445) and internal rotation (<em>P</em> = .268). There were no differences in the degree of stress shielding between groups (<em>P</em> = .185).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with a convertible metaphyseal-based short inlay humeral stem demonstrates excellent patient-reported functional and radiographic outcomes 2 years postoperatively. No differences in restoration of humeral head anatomy, degree of stress shielding, patient-reported functional outcomes, and osteotomy healing rates were identified between patients undergoing metaphyseal short-stemmed and stemless aTSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2098-2103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.007
Estelle Wigmore BEng (Hons) , Joshua G. Twiggs PhD , Mark Taylor PhD , Rami M.A. Al-Dirini PhD , Harry D.S. Clitherow MBChB, FRACS (Orth) , Brendan C.L. Soo MBBS, FRACS (Orth) , Warwick J.L. Wright MBBS, FRACS (Orth) , Benjamin Kenny MBBS, FRACS (Orth)
Background
Malalignment of the humeral and glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with complications such as instability, implant loosening, and restricted motion. While the accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component orientation is well documented, the precision of PSI for humeral osteotomy has not yet been published for a noncadaveric environment. This study aims to calculate the deviation between the planned and achieved orientations of humeral and glenoid components using PSI in a clinical, in vivo setting.
Methods
Forty-six patients were enrolled. One patient was excluded due to an intraoperative change to humeral component selection. The gender, etiology for arthroplasty (osteoarthritis or cuff tear arthropathy), severity of glenoid wear based on the Walch classification, and procedure (anatomic or reverse) were recorded. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively for 3-dimensional reconstruction, from which the target humeral and glenoid component orientations for each patient were selected by the surgeon in the ASTRA surgical planning platform (Enovis, Austin, TX, USA). Humeral and glenoid PSIs were designed and 3-dimensionally printed to execute the planned alignments. A postoperative CT scan was acquired and used to calculate the deviation between the planned and achieved humeral version, humeral neck-shaft angle, humeral osteotomy height, glenoid version, and glenoid inclination. Humeral version was able to be calculated for 22 patients (48.9%) with a CT scan which extended distally beyond the humeral epicondyles.
Results
A total of 8 outliers (17.8%) were identified across all orientation parameters: 5 outliers (11.1%) for humeral orientation and 3 (6.7%) for glenoid orientation. The average deviation was 2.9°, 2.2°, 1.3 mm, 1.7° and 1.4° for humeral version, humeral neck-shaft angle, humeral osteotomy height, glenoid version, and glenoid inclination, respectively. The mean deviation in glenoid version was greater in males than females (P = .007). However, no other statistically significant difference was found between the mean or variance in deviation when comparing cohorts stratified by etiology of arthroplasty, severity of glenoid wear, or surgical procedure.
Conclusion
PSI generated from CT-based planning can achieve precise execution of preoperative plans in 89% of humeral and 93% of glenoid components in both anatomic and reverse procedures across a variety of patient morphologies. The humeral guide, when used in a more challenging in vivo environment, demonstrates accuracy comparable to those observed in existing ex vivo studies.
{"title":"Clinical accuracy of humeral and glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty using ASTRA patient-specific guides","authors":"Estelle Wigmore BEng (Hons) , Joshua G. Twiggs PhD , Mark Taylor PhD , Rami M.A. Al-Dirini PhD , Harry D.S. Clitherow MBChB, FRACS (Orth) , Brendan C.L. Soo MBBS, FRACS (Orth) , Warwick J.L. Wright MBBS, FRACS (Orth) , Benjamin Kenny MBBS, FRACS (Orth)","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Malalignment of the humeral and glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with complications such as instability, implant loosening, and restricted motion. While the accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component orientation is well documented, the precision of PSI for humeral osteotomy has not yet been published for a noncadaveric environment. This study aims to calculate the deviation between the planned and achieved orientations of humeral and glenoid components using PSI in a clinical, in vivo setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-six patients were enrolled. One patient was excluded due to an intraoperative change to humeral component selection. The gender, etiology for arthroplasty (osteoarthritis or cuff tear arthropathy), severity of glenoid wear based on the Walch classification, and procedure (anatomic or reverse) were recorded. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively for 3-dimensional reconstruction, from which the target humeral and glenoid component orientations for each patient were selected by the surgeon in the ASTRA surgical planning platform (Enovis, Austin, TX, USA). Humeral and glenoid PSIs were designed and 3-dimensionally printed to execute the planned alignments. A postoperative CT scan was acquired and used to calculate the deviation between the planned and achieved humeral version, humeral neck-shaft angle, humeral osteotomy height, glenoid version, and glenoid inclination. Humeral version was able to be calculated for 22 patients (48.9%) with a CT scan which extended distally beyond the humeral epicondyles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 8 outliers (17.8%) were identified across all orientation parameters: 5 outliers (11.1%) for humeral orientation and 3 (6.7%) for glenoid orientation. The average deviation was 2.9°, 2.2°, 1.3 mm, 1.7° and 1.4° for humeral version, humeral neck-shaft angle, humeral osteotomy height, glenoid version, and glenoid inclination, respectively. The mean deviation in glenoid version was greater in males than females (<em>P</em> = .007). However, no other statistically significant difference was found between the mean or variance in deviation when comparing cohorts stratified by etiology of arthroplasty, severity of glenoid wear, or surgical procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PSI generated from CT-based planning can achieve precise execution of preoperative plans in 89% of humeral and 93% of glenoid components in both anatomic and reverse procedures across a variety of patient morphologies. The humeral guide, when used in a more challenging in vivo environment, demonstrates accuracy comparable to those observed in existing ex vivo studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2127-2140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.007
Cormac Kelly FRCS Ed (Orth) , Géza Pap MD (Prof) , Richard W. Nyffeler MD , Falk Reuther MD , Ulrich Irlenbusch MD, PhD
Background
Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) with ceramic implants have shown promising midterm clinical outcomes. However, long-term clinical data on ceramic humeral head prostheses are not available. We therefore evaluated the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, including implant survival and complication rates, of a stemless ceramic humeral head prosthesis in different shoulder pathologies.
Methods
In this prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients underwent stemless aTSA using a ceramic humeral head prosthesis. We recorded Constant–Murley Scores (CSs), radiolucent lines (RLLs), complications, and long-term prosthesis survival.
Results
We treated 238 patients (238 shoulders) with a stemless ceramic humeral head prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded from 120 shoulders at a median follow-up of 125.4 months, and complications from 229 shoulders. At final follow-up, CSs improved significantly from preoperative values (P < .0001). Although RLLs appeared both at the glenoid and humerus, osteolysis, wear, and aseptic loosening were rare (0.9%) and confined to the glenoid side; no aseptic loosening of the humeral component was noted. Prosthesis survival at 13 years reached 89.9% for all revisions and 90.8% for humeral component revision.
Conclusion
Stemless aTSA with a ceramic humeral head prosthesis resulted in good CSs, a low number of clinically relevant RLLs, low incidences of glenoid osteolysis and aseptic loosening, no aseptic loosening of the humeral component, and high prosthesis survival rates in the long term. Moreover, nine out of ten prostheses remained in situ and were functional after 10 years, confirming the long-term success of this ceramic prosthesis.
{"title":"Long-term follow-up of stemless anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with a ceramic humeral head prosthesis: a multicenter study","authors":"Cormac Kelly FRCS Ed (Orth) , Géza Pap MD (Prof) , Richard W. Nyffeler MD , Falk Reuther MD , Ulrich Irlenbusch MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) with ceramic implants have shown promising midterm clinical outcomes. However, long-term clinical data on ceramic humeral head prostheses are not available. We therefore evaluated the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, including implant survival and complication rates, of a stemless ceramic humeral head prosthesis in different shoulder pathologies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients underwent stemless aTSA using a ceramic humeral head prosthesis. We recorded Constant–Murley Scores (CSs), radiolucent lines (RLLs), complications, and long-term prosthesis survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We treated 238 patients (238 shoulders) with a stemless ceramic humeral head prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded from 120 shoulders at a median follow-up of 125.4 months, and complications from 229 shoulders. At final follow-up, CSs improved significantly from preoperative values (<em>P</em> < .0001). Although RLLs appeared both at the glenoid and humerus, osteolysis, wear, and aseptic loosening were rare (0.9%) and confined to the glenoid side; no aseptic loosening of the humeral component was noted. Prosthesis survival at 13 years reached 89.9% for all revisions and 90.8% for humeral component revision.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Stemless aTSA with a ceramic humeral head prosthesis resulted in good CSs, a low number of clinically relevant RLLs, low incidences of glenoid osteolysis and aseptic loosening, no aseptic loosening of the humeral component, and high prosthesis survival rates in the long term. Moreover, nine out of ten prostheses remained in situ and were functional after 10 years, confirming the long-term success of this ceramic prosthesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2044-2052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The coronoid process of the ulna is crucial for both anteroposterior and axial elbow stability. Currently, there is no safe and X-ray–free method for targeting the coronoid from the posterior cortex of the ulna, for temporary or permanent fixation. This study aims to define a range, easy to use in surgical practice, to safely target the coronoid process from the dorsal cortex of the ulna and to normalize the range based on the inter-epicondylar distance (IED).
Methods
For the study, 3 different parameters were assessed: the APEX (olecranon to coronoid apex distance), BASE (olecranon to coronoid base distance), and the IED from 109 computed tomographies.
Results
The mean APEX was 20.6 mm (19.3 mm in females and 21.3 mm in males), and the mean BASE was 33.9 mm (31.9 mm in females and 35.1 mm in males). The mean IED was 59 mm (53.3 mm in females and 62.3 mm in males), the mean ratio between APEX and IED was 0.3 (0.4 in females and 0.3 in males), the mean ratio between BASE and IED was 0.6 (0.6 in males and females). These data were significantly different in males and females (P < .05).
Conclusions
This study contributes to establishing a practical range for the safe targeting of the coronoid process from the dorsal cortex of the ulna in surgical practice. A safe approach to the coronoid can be achieved by maintaining a perpendicular trajectory to the dorsal cortex of the olecranon within a safe range of 2 to 3.5 cm from its most prominent point.
{"title":"How to target the coronoid from the dorsal cortex","authors":"Simone Cassin MD , Valeria Vismara MD , Aurelien Traverso MD , Christos Koukos MD , Pietro Simone Randelli MD , Paolo Arrigoni MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The coronoid process of the ulna is crucial for both anteroposterior and axial elbow stability. Currently, there is no safe and X-ray–free method for targeting the coronoid from the posterior cortex of the ulna, for temporary or permanent fixation. This study aims to define a range, easy to use in surgical practice, to safely target the coronoid process from the dorsal cortex of the ulna and to normalize the range based on the inter-epicondylar distance (IED).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For the study, 3 different parameters were assessed: the APEX (olecranon to coronoid apex distance), BASE (olecranon to coronoid base distance), and the IED from 109 computed tomographies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean APEX was 20.6 mm (19.3 mm in females and 21.3 mm in males), and the mean BASE was 33.9 mm (31.9 mm in females and 35.1 mm in males). The mean IED was 59 mm (53.3 mm in females and 62.3 mm in males), the mean ratio between APEX and IED was 0.3 (0.4 in females and 0.3 in males), the mean ratio between BASE and IED was 0.6 (0.6 in males and females). These data were significantly different in males and females (<em>P</em> < .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study contributes to establishing a practical range for the safe targeting of the coronoid process from the dorsal cortex of the ulna in surgical practice. A safe approach to the coronoid can be achieved by maintaining a perpendicular trajectory to the dorsal cortex of the olecranon within a safe range of 2 to 3.5 cm from its most prominent point.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2186-2191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}