首页 > 最新文献

JSES International最新文献

英文 中文
Continental and demographic analysis of preoperative measurements in shoulder arthroplasty from a large-scale dataset using Materialise software for surgical planning 使用Materialise软件进行手术计划,从大规模数据集对肩关节置换术术前测量进行大陆和人口统计学分析
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.011
Sanne Vancleef PhD , Eric Avila MD, PhD , Filip Jonkergouw MSc , Joyce Van den Broeck PhD , Jason Corban MD , Adam R. Bowler BA , Declan R. Diestel BA , Miranda McDonald-Stahl BS , Andrew Jawa MD

Background

Preoperative planning software is increasingly used in shoulder arthroplasty to optimize implant placement. This study aims to describe the methods used in Materialise's planning software for critical measurement parameters to provide a benchmark for cases planned using Materialise software, and to analyze the demographics and characteristics of patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) across different continents and sexes.

Methods

A dataset of 11,509 surgeon-approved planning cases (2018-2023) from the TRUMATCH Personalized Solutions Shoulder System was analyzed. The software automatically generates three-dimensional models from computed tomography scans and measures glenoid version, inclination, humeral subluxation, glenoid vault loss, and maximum erosion depth. A univariate statistical analysis, including Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction, was conducted to evaluate differences across surgery types (rTSA vs. aTSA), sex, and continents (North America, Europe, Oceania).

Results

The population had an average age of 69.9 years, with 65.7% undergoing rTSA and 34.3% undergoing aTSA. Significant differences were observed between rTSA and aTSA patients in terms of age, version angle, inclination angle, erosion depth, and humeral head diameter. Females accounted for 53.1% of the dataset and were generally older, with less retroversion and subluxation compared to males. Regionally, 61% of procedures were performed in North America, 25% in Europe, and 14% in Oceania. rTSA was more common than aTSA across all continents, with the highest proportion found in Europe (86%). Significant continental differences were noted in age, version angle, subluxation, and humeral head diameter.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive methodology for preoperative measurements using Materialise software and highlights significant demographic and continental differences in shoulder arthroplasty parameters. These findings underscore the need for standardized measurement methods and suggest that continental and sex-specific factors influence the choice between rTSA and aTSA. Future research should focus on correlating surgical plans with outcomes to optimize treatment strategies tailored to individual patient needs.
术前计划软件越来越多地用于肩关节置换术,以优化植入物的放置。本研究旨在描述Materialise计划软件中用于关键测量参数的方法,为使用Materialise软件计划的病例提供基准,并分析不同大陆和性别接受反向肩关节置换术(rTSA)和解剖性全肩关节置换术(aTSA)的患者的人口统计学和特征。方法分析TRUMATCH个性化肩部解决方案系统2018-2023年11,509例外科医生批准的计划病例数据集。该软件从计算机断层扫描自动生成三维模型,并测量肩关节版本,倾角,肱骨半脱位,肩关节拱顶损失和最大侵蚀深度。采用单变量统计分析,包括Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验,并进行Bonferroni校正,以评估手术类型(rTSA与aTSA)、性别和大洲(北美、欧洲、大洋洲)的差异。结果患者平均年龄69.9岁,接受rTSA的占65.7%,接受aTSA的占34.3%。rTSA患者与aTSA患者在年龄、角度、倾斜角、糜烂深度、肱骨头直径等方面存在显著差异。女性占数据集的53.1%,通常年龄较大,与男性相比,逆行和半脱位较少。从区域来看,61%的手术在北美进行,25%在欧洲进行,14%在大洋洲进行。在各大洲,rTSA比aTSA更常见,其中欧洲的比例最高(86%)。在年龄、版本角、半脱位和肱骨头直径方面存在显著的大陆差异。结论:本研究提供了使用Materialise软件进行术前测量的综合方法,并突出了肩关节置换术参数的显著人口统计学和大陆差异。这些发现强调了标准化测量方法的必要性,并表明大陆和性别特异性因素影响rTSA和aTSA之间的选择。未来的研究应侧重于将手术计划与结果相关联,以优化针对个体患者需求的治疗策略。
{"title":"Continental and demographic analysis of preoperative measurements in shoulder arthroplasty from a large-scale dataset using Materialise software for surgical planning","authors":"Sanne Vancleef PhD ,&nbsp;Eric Avila MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Filip Jonkergouw MSc ,&nbsp;Joyce Van den Broeck PhD ,&nbsp;Jason Corban MD ,&nbsp;Adam R. Bowler BA ,&nbsp;Declan R. Diestel BA ,&nbsp;Miranda McDonald-Stahl BS ,&nbsp;Andrew Jawa MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preoperative planning software is increasingly used in shoulder arthroplasty to optimize implant placement. This study aims to describe the methods used in Materialise's planning software for critical measurement parameters to provide a benchmark for cases planned using Materialise software, and to analyze the demographics and characteristics of patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) across different continents and sexes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A dataset of 11,509 surgeon-approved planning cases (2018-2023) from the TRUMATCH Personalized Solutions Shoulder System was analyzed. The software automatically generates three-dimensional models from computed tomography scans and measures glenoid version, inclination, humeral subluxation, glenoid vault loss, and maximum erosion depth. A univariate statistical analysis, including Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction, was conducted to evaluate differences across surgery types (rTSA vs. aTSA), sex, and continents (North America, Europe, Oceania).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The population had an average age of 69.9 years, with 65.7% undergoing rTSA and 34.3% undergoing aTSA. Significant differences were observed between rTSA and aTSA patients in terms of age, version angle, inclination angle, erosion depth, and humeral head diameter. Females accounted for 53.1% of the dataset and were generally older, with less retroversion and subluxation compared to males. Regionally, 61% of procedures were performed in North America, 25% in Europe, and 14% in Oceania. rTSA was more common than aTSA across all continents, with the highest proportion found in Europe (86%). Significant continental differences were noted in age, version angle, subluxation, and humeral head diameter.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides a comprehensive methodology for preoperative measurements using Materialise software and highlights significant demographic and continental differences in shoulder arthroplasty parameters. These findings underscore the need for standardized measurement methods and suggest that continental and sex-specific factors influence the choice between rTSA and aTSA. Future research should focus on correlating surgical plans with outcomes to optimize treatment strategies tailored to individual patient needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2069-2080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The nature of the annular ligament: a scoping review and histological analysis using a dual approach 环状韧带的性质:使用双重方法的范围审查和组织学分析
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.002
Floor A.J. ten Have BSc , Steef H. Boekholt BSc , Niels W. Schep MD, PhD , Jeffrey Damman MD, PhD , Gert J. Kleinrensink PhD

Background

The annular ligament (ANL) is a crucial structure of the elbow joint, playing a vital role in maintaining stability and function of the radial head (RH). Despite its known anatomical and stabilizing roles, the histological composition of the ANL remains unclear. The first article to describe its nature introduced the concept of a wrap-around ligament. A wrap-around ligament is defined as “any tendon that bends around a bony pulley or threads through a fibrous 1 en route to its insertion”. These ligaments are often fibrocartilaginous due to an adaptation to compressive forces. During pronation and supination the ANL is compressed against the RH. Therefore, the authors hypothesize that the ANL contains (fibro)cartilaginous tissue where the ligament is compressed against and experiences friction from the RH. Understanding the precise histological nature of the ANL is essential for surgical procedures involving the RH, such as fracture osteosynthesis, in which hardware placement may lead to complications.

Methods

This study consisted of 2 components: a scoping review and a histological analysis. First, a scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic literature search was performed using Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Published literature was screened, and articles were included if they addressed the ANL and its histology or tissue composition. In addition to the review, a histological analysis was performed on 3 ANLs from postmortem human specimens.

Results

A total of 2,453 articles were identified, of which 7 met the eligibility criteria. The literature search revealed discrepancies regarding the presence and location of fibrocartilage and synovial linings within the ANL. Histological examination of 3 postmortem human specimens samples showed (fibro)cartilage cells in 1 ligament and chondrification in another. These features were located in the central part of the ANL, where it articulates with and is compressed against the RH. The third ligament showed no fibrocartilage cells. All 3 ANLs exhibited a synovial lining on the lateral side where the ligament attached to the ulna, but not in the center part of the ligament, between the articulating surfaces of the ANL and the RH.

Conclusion

The ANL is a wrap-around ligament and contains (fibro)cartilaginous tissue. There was no synovial lining present on the articulating surface of the ANL between the ANL and the RH.
背景环韧带(ANL)是肘关节的重要结构,在维持桡骨头(RH)的稳定性和功能方面起着至关重要的作用。尽管其已知的解剖和稳定作用,ANL的组织学组成仍不清楚。第一篇描述其性质的文章介绍了缠绕韧带的概念。缠绕韧带被定义为“任何在骨滑轮周围弯曲或穿过纤维的肌腱”。由于适应压缩力,这些韧带通常是纤维软骨。在旋前和旋后,ANL紧贴RH。因此,作者假设ANL包含(纤维)软骨组织,其中韧带被压缩并经历来自RH的摩擦。了解ANL的确切组织学性质对于涉及RH的外科手术至关重要,例如骨折骨融合术,其中硬件放置可能导致并发症。方法本研究由两部分组成:范围综述和组织学分析。首先,根据系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展进行范围评价。使用Embase、Medline、Web of Science Core Collection、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Library进行系统的文献检索。对已发表的文献进行筛选,并纳入涉及ANL及其组织学或组织组成的文章。除了回顾外,还对3例死后人类标本的anl进行了组织学分析。结果共检出2453篇文献,其中符合入选标准的有7篇。文献检索揭示了纤维软骨和滑膜衬里在ANL内的存在和位置的差异。3例人死后标本的组织学检查显示,1例韧带中有纤维软骨细胞,另1例韧带中有软骨细胞。这些特征位于ANL的中心部分,在那里它与RH相连并被压缩。第三韧带未见纤维软骨细胞。所有3例ANL均在韧带与尺骨连接处的外侧有滑膜衬里,但在ANL和RH关节面之间的韧带中心部分没有。结论ANL是一种缠绕韧带,含有纤维软骨组织。在ANL和RH之间的ANL关节面没有滑膜衬里。
{"title":"The nature of the annular ligament: a scoping review and histological analysis using a dual approach","authors":"Floor A.J. ten Have BSc ,&nbsp;Steef H. Boekholt BSc ,&nbsp;Niels W. Schep MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Damman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gert J. Kleinrensink PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The annular ligament (ANL) is a crucial structure of the elbow joint, playing a vital role in maintaining stability and function of the radial head (RH). Despite its known anatomical and stabilizing roles, the histological composition of the ANL remains unclear. The first article to describe its nature introduced the concept of a wrap-around ligament. A wrap-around ligament is defined as “any tendon that bends around a bony pulley or threads through a fibrous 1 en route to its insertion”. These ligaments are often fibrocartilaginous due to an adaptation to compressive forces. During pronation and supination the ANL is compressed against the RH. Therefore, the authors hypothesize that the ANL contains (fibro)cartilaginous tissue where the ligament is compressed against and experiences friction from the RH. Understanding the precise histological nature of the ANL is essential for surgical procedures involving the RH, such as fracture osteosynthesis, in which hardware placement may lead to complications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study consisted of 2 components: a scoping review and a histological analysis. First, a scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic literature search was performed using Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Published literature was screened, and articles were included if they addressed the ANL and its histology or tissue composition. In addition to the review, a histological analysis was performed on 3 ANLs from postmortem human specimens.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2,453 articles were identified, of which 7 met the eligibility criteria. The literature search revealed discrepancies regarding the presence and location of fibrocartilage and synovial linings within the ANL. Histological examination of 3 postmortem human specimens samples showed (fibro)cartilage cells in 1 ligament and chondrification in another. These features were located in the central part of the ANL, where it articulates with and is compressed against the RH. The third ligament showed no fibrocartilage cells. All 3 ANLs exhibited a synovial lining on the lateral side where the ligament attached to the ulna, but not in the center part of the ligament, between the articulating surfaces of the ANL and the RH.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ANL is a wrap-around ligament and contains (fibro)cartilaginous tissue. There was no synovial lining present on the articulating surface of the ANL between the ANL and the RH.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2161-2169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of inferior glenoid version and glenoid index on recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation 下盂形和盂指数对复发性肩前脱位的影响
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.005
Md Quamar Azam MS (Dr, Orthopaedics, Professor & Head) , Anjum Syed MD (Dr, Radiodiagnosis, Professor & Head) , Ajay Sharma MS (Dr, Orthopaedics, Senior Resident) , Arvind Yadav MCh (Dr, Sports Injury, Assistant Professor) , Bhaskar Sarkar MS (Dr, Orthopaedics Additional Professor) , Nirvin Paul MS (Dr, Orthopaedics, Senior Resident)

Background

Recent studies have suggested a possible association between glenoid morphometric measurements and recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, though the evidence remains inconclusive due to conflicting findings. This study investigates the relationship between various glenoid parameters in a normal population and compares them with measurements in patients with established recurrent shoulder dislocation. This study hypothesizes that glenoid version, inclination, and index are independent risk factors for anterior shoulder instability.

Method

Data from 100 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation (study group) were compared with that of 116 matched patients (control group) who attended the hospital and underwent a Computed Tomography scan of the shoulder without any history of shoulder pathology.

Result

The mean version at inferior glenoid in the dislocation group was +1.68° (−9.5 to 12.9) and in controls was −0.25° (−8.5 to 9.2), the value was statistically significant with P value <.01. Relative version at inferior glenoid with respect to middle glenoid was +2.96° (−1.8 to 7.6) in cases and +0.18° (−4.8 to 4.9) in controls, the value was statistically significant with P value <.01. The average glenoid index values were 1.58 (1.49 to 1.70) in cases and 1.52 (1.40 to 1.61) in controls, and the values were found to be statistically significant with P value <.01. Mean superior glenoid inclination was higher in cases (10.49) as compared to controls (9.76); the difference in means was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

We conclude that increased inferior glenoid anteversion and a higher glenoid index are significantly associated with anterior shoulder instability.
最近的研究表明肩关节形态测量与复发性前肩脱位之间可能存在关联,但由于研究结果相互矛盾,证据仍不确定。本研究调查了正常人群中各种肩关节参数之间的关系,并将其与复发性肩关节脱位患者的测量结果进行了比较。本研究假设关节盂内翻、倾斜和指数是肩关节前部不稳定的独立危险因素。方法将100例复发性肩关节前脱位患者(研究组)的数据与116例匹配的无肩关节病理史的患者(对照组)进行比较。结果脱位组下盂关节平均角度为+1.68°(- 9.5 ~ 12.9),对照组为- 0.25°(- 8.5 ~ 9.2),差异有统计学意义(P值<; 01)。下盂关节相对于中盂关节的相对角度,病例为+2.96°(−1.8 ~ 7.6),对照组为+0.18°(−4.8 ~ 4.9),P值为0.01,差异有统计学意义。两组肩关节指数平均值分别为1.58(1.49 ~ 1.70)和1.52(1.40 ~ 1.61),差异有统计学意义(P值<; 0.01)。与对照组(9.76)相比,病例的上盂关节倾斜平均值(10.49)更高;平均值差异无统计学意义。结论下盂前倾加重和较高的盂指数与前肩不稳有显著关系。
{"title":"Influence of inferior glenoid version and glenoid index on recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation","authors":"Md Quamar Azam MS (Dr, Orthopaedics, Professor & Head) ,&nbsp;Anjum Syed MD (Dr, Radiodiagnosis, Professor & Head) ,&nbsp;Ajay Sharma MS (Dr, Orthopaedics, Senior Resident) ,&nbsp;Arvind Yadav MCh (Dr, Sports Injury, Assistant Professor) ,&nbsp;Bhaskar Sarkar MS (Dr, Orthopaedics Additional Professor) ,&nbsp;Nirvin Paul MS (Dr, Orthopaedics, Senior Resident)","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent studies have suggested a possible association between glenoid morphometric measurements and recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, though the evidence remains inconclusive due to conflicting findings. This study investigates the relationship between various glenoid parameters in a normal population and compares them with measurements in patients with established recurrent shoulder dislocation. This study hypothesizes that glenoid version, inclination, and index are independent risk factors for anterior shoulder instability.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Data from 100 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation (study group) were compared with that of 116 matched patients (control group) who attended the hospital and underwent a Computed Tomography scan of the shoulder without any history of shoulder pathology.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The mean version at inferior glenoid in the dislocation group was +1.68° (−9.5 to 12.9) and in controls was −0.25° (−8.5 to 9.2), the value was statistically significant with <em>P</em> value &lt;.01. Relative version at inferior glenoid with respect to middle glenoid was +2.96° (−1.8 to 7.6) in cases and +0.18° (−4.8 to 4.9) in controls, the value was statistically significant with <em>P</em> value &lt;.01. The average glenoid index values were 1.58 (1.49 to 1.70) in cases and 1.52 (1.40 to 1.61) in controls, and the values were found to be statistically significant with <em>P</em> value &lt;.01. Mean superior glenoid inclination was higher in cases (10.49) as compared to controls (9.76); the difference in means was not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We conclude that increased inferior glenoid anteversion and a higher glenoid index are significantly associated with anterior shoulder instability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 1901-1907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimization of lesser tuberosity osteotomy repair: a biomechanical assessment of suture tensioning, repair configuration, and type of suture 小结节截骨修复的优化:缝合张力、修复结构和缝合类型的生物力学评估
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.001
Mitchell H. Negus BS , Peter W. Kurtz BS , Megan Welsh BS , Shuchun Sun PhD , Robert J. Reis BS , Brandon L. Rogalski MD , Richard J. Friedman MD, FRCSC , Jeremy L. Gilbert PhD , Josef K. Eichinger MD

Background

Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is an effective method to manage the subscapularis for total shoulder arthroplasty but requires adequate compression and stability for healing after repair. The optimal configuration and type of sutures for LTO repair are unknown. The effect of variable surgeon strength on repair is similarly an unknown factor and may play a role in construct repair security. This study measured, in vitro, the effect of suture number and the effect of surgeon manual strength on repair. We hypothesized that increasing the number of sutures or selecting suture tapes over conventional sutures produces a stronger repair. Secondarily, we hypothesized that differences in surgeon manual strength introduce variability into the strength of the repair.

Methods

A custom jig was used to mechanically test conventional #5 braided suture and 1.7 mm suture tape. Combinations of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 sutures of each type were preloaded, cyclically loaded, and loaded to ultimate failure. After measuring grip strength and traction strength of 3 orthopedic surgeons, we tested their hand-tied repairs and compared them to a self-tensioning suture cerclage system.

Results

Increasing the number of sutures significantly increased the strength of repair in a relatively linear fashion (P < .001). Tests with #5 sutures showed a significant difference between 3 and 4 sutures (P = .005); however, those with suture tape did not. All 3 surgeons demonstrated significantly different grip strengths. Surgeon 2 showed greater traction strength than Surgeon 1 (P < .001) and Surgeon 3 (P < .001). Hand-tied repairs mirrored this trend, as those performed by Surgeon 2 were stronger than those by Surgeon 1 (P = .041) and Surgeon 3 (P = .028). A self-tensioning suture cerclage system was equivalent to all surgeons' hand-tied repairs.

Conclusion

Four sutures appear to be an efficient number for LTO repair, as we observed no appreciable increase in strength with the addition of a fifth suture. There was no difference in strength between the suture types. Hand-tied repairs exhibit significant differences in strength among surgeons. If a surgeon considers this variation unfavorable, they may opt to use a tensioning device to ensure consistent repair strength according to their clinical judgment.
背景:小结节截骨术(LTO)是处理肩胛下肌全肩关节置换术的有效方法,但需要足够的压迫和修复后愈合的稳定性。LTO修复的最佳结构和缝合类型尚不清楚。不同的手术强度对修复的影响同样是一个未知的因素,可能在构建修复安全性中起作用。本研究在体外测量了缝合次数和外科医生手法强度对修复的影响。我们假设增加缝合线的数量或选择缝合带比传统缝合线产生更强的修复。其次,我们假设外科医生手工力量的差异会导致修复强度的变化。方法采用定制夹具对常规5号编织线和1.7 mm缝合带进行机械测试。每种类型的1、2、3、4和5缝线的组合预加载,循环加载,加载至最终失效。在测量了3位骨科医生的握力和牵引强度后,我们测试了他们的手系修复,并将其与自张缝合环扎系统进行了比较。结果缝线次数的增加可显著提高修复强度,并呈相对线性关系(P < 0.001)。使用5号缝线的测试显示,3和4条缝线之间存在显著差异(P = 0.005);而使用缝合带的患者则没有。3位外科医生均表现出明显不同的握力。外科医生2的牵引强度高于外科医生1 (P < .001)和外科医生3 (P < .001)。手工修复反映了这一趋势,外科医生2比外科医生1 (P = 0.041)和外科医生3 (P = 0.028)进行的修复更强。自张缝合环扣系统相当于所有外科医生的手工修复。结论4条缝线似乎是LTO修复的有效数量,因为我们观察到在增加第5条缝线时强度没有明显增加。两种缝合方式在强度上无差异。手系修复术在外科医生之间表现出明显的力量差异。如果外科医生认为这种变化是不利的,他们可能会根据他们的临床判断选择使用张力装置来确保一致的修复强度。
{"title":"Optimization of lesser tuberosity osteotomy repair: a biomechanical assessment of suture tensioning, repair configuration, and type of suture","authors":"Mitchell H. Negus BS ,&nbsp;Peter W. Kurtz BS ,&nbsp;Megan Welsh BS ,&nbsp;Shuchun Sun PhD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Reis BS ,&nbsp;Brandon L. Rogalski MD ,&nbsp;Richard J. Friedman MD, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Jeremy L. Gilbert PhD ,&nbsp;Josef K. Eichinger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is an effective method to manage the subscapularis for total shoulder arthroplasty but requires adequate compression and stability for healing after repair. The optimal configuration and type of sutures for LTO repair are unknown. The effect of variable surgeon strength on repair is similarly an unknown factor and may play a role in construct repair security. This study measured, in vitro, the effect of suture number and the effect of surgeon manual strength on repair. We hypothesized that increasing the number of sutures or selecting suture tapes over conventional sutures produces a stronger repair. Secondarily, we hypothesized that differences in surgeon manual strength introduce variability into the strength of the repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A custom jig was used to mechanically test conventional #5 braided suture and 1.7 mm suture tape. Combinations of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 sutures of each type were preloaded, cyclically loaded, and loaded to ultimate failure. After measuring grip strength and traction strength of 3 orthopedic surgeons, we tested their hand-tied repairs and compared them to a self-tensioning suture cerclage system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Increasing the number of sutures significantly increased the strength of repair in a relatively linear fashion (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Tests with #5 sutures showed a significant difference between 3 and 4 sutures (<em>P</em> = .005); however, those with suture tape did not. All 3 surgeons demonstrated significantly different grip strengths. Surgeon 2 showed greater traction strength than Surgeon 1 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and Surgeon 3 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Hand-tied repairs mirrored this trend, as those performed by Surgeon 2 were stronger than those by Surgeon 1 (<em>P</em> = .041) and Surgeon 3 (<em>P</em> = .028). A self-tensioning suture cerclage system was equivalent to all surgeons' hand-tied repairs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Four sutures appear to be an efficient number for LTO repair, as we observed no appreciable increase in strength with the addition of a fifth suture. There was no difference in strength between the suture types. Hand-tied repairs exhibit significant differences in strength among surgeons. If a surgeon considers this variation unfavorable, they may opt to use a tensioning device to ensure consistent repair strength according to their clinical judgment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2104-2111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does fluid irrigation in arthroscopic shoulder biopsy affect sensitivity of Cutibacterium acnes cultures for prosthetic shoulder joint infections? 关节镜肩关节活检中的液体冲洗是否影响假肩关节感染中痤疮表皮杆菌培养的敏感性?
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.005
Thomas Stanila BS , Amanda Harrington PhD , Andrew L. Chen MD , Samuel E. Mircoff BS , Dane H. Salazar MD, MBA , Nickolas G. Garbis MD

Background

Cutibacterium acnes is the most common infectious agent in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection. Culture-based detection from tissue biopsy is the current gold standard for diagnosis, but the methods used to obtain it may affect accuracy of biopsies. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of shoulder arthroscopy irrigation on culture-based detection from tissue biopsy samples for suspected C. acnes colonization in the setting of a periprosthetic total shoulder infection.

Methods

An in vitro model was designed to hold Gelfoam inoculated with a standard inoculum of C. acnes. Sterile sampling was performed in simulation of arthroscopic practice, both with and without saline irrigation being applied. All biopsies were subsequently incubated under anaerobic conditions in broth media and monitored for visible growth over the course of 14 days.

Results

Sixty samples were collected for the no-irrigation group and 60 samples were collected for the irrigation group. A total of 19 biopsies (32%) in the no-irrigation group resulted in positive C. acnes growth within two weeks of initial culturing, compared to 14 positive biopsies (23%) in the irrigation group (P = .310). No significant differences resulted between the no-irrigation and irrigation groups at each evaluated time point (0-2 days, 3-7 days, 8-14 days).

Conclusion

In the context of our model, irrigation during shoulder arthroscopy did not significantly impact recovery of C. acnes using culture-based methods in the setting of shoulder periprosthetic joint infections.
背景:痤疮表皮杆菌是肩关节假体周围最常见的感染因子。从组织活检中基于培养的检测是目前诊断的金标准,但用于获得它的方法可能会影响活检的准确性。本研究的目的是研究肩关节镜冲洗对假体周围全肩关节感染的组织活检样本中疑似痤疮杆菌定植的培养检测的影响。方法用标准接种液接种明胶泡沫塑料,建立体外培养模型。无菌取样进行模拟关节镜的做法,有和没有盐水冲洗应用。所有活检组织随后在肉汤培养基厌氧条件下孵育,并在14天的过程中监测明显的生长。结果不灌水组采集标本60份,灌水组采集标本60份。无冲洗组共有19例活组织检查(32%)在初始培养后两周内出现痤疮芽孢杆菌阳性生长,而冲洗组有14例活组织检查阳性(23%)(P = 0.310)。在每个评估时间点(0-2天,3-7天,8-14天),无灌溉组和灌溉组之间无显著差异。结论在我们的模型中,肩关节镜检查期间的冲洗对肩关节周围感染的痤疮杆菌的恢复没有显著影响。
{"title":"Does fluid irrigation in arthroscopic shoulder biopsy affect sensitivity of Cutibacterium acnes cultures for prosthetic shoulder joint infections?","authors":"Thomas Stanila BS ,&nbsp;Amanda Harrington PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew L. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Samuel E. Mircoff BS ,&nbsp;Dane H. Salazar MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Nickolas G. Garbis MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Cutibacterium acnes</em> is the most common infectious agent in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection. Culture-based detection from tissue biopsy is the current gold standard for diagnosis, but the methods used to obtain it may affect accuracy of biopsies. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of shoulder arthroscopy irrigation on culture-based detection from tissue biopsy samples for suspected <em>C. acnes</em> colonization in the setting of a periprosthetic total shoulder infection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An <em>in vitro</em> model was designed to hold Gelfoam inoculated with a standard inoculum of <em>C. acnes</em>. Sterile sampling was performed in simulation of arthroscopic practice, both with and without saline irrigation being applied. All biopsies were subsequently incubated under anaerobic conditions in broth media and monitored for visible growth over the course of 14 days.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty samples were collected for the no-irrigation group and 60 samples were collected for the irrigation group. A total of 19 biopsies (32%) in the no-irrigation group resulted in positive <em>C. acnes</em> growth within two weeks of initial culturing, compared to 14 positive biopsies (23%) in the irrigation group (<em>P</em> = .310). No significant differences resulted between the no-irrigation and irrigation groups at each evaluated time point (0-2 days, 3-7 days, 8-14 days).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the context of our model, irrigation during shoulder arthroscopy did not significantly impact recovery of <em>C. acnes</em> using culture-based methods in the setting of shoulder periprosthetic joint infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2122-2126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair: a 10-year follow-up study 关节镜下Bankart修复的长期结果:一项10年随访研究
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.004
Shogo Sugawara MD , Nobuyuki Yamamoto MD, PhD , Yusuke Koibuchi MD , Kazuma Sasaki MD , Rei Kimura MD , Atsushi Arino MD , Jun Kawakami MD, PhD , Hideaki Nagamoto MD, PhD , Toshimi Aizawa MD, PhD , Eiji Itoi MD, PhD

Background

Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is the gold standard for anterior shoulder dislocation, with many studies demonstrating favorable short-term outcomes. However, few reports focus on the long-term outcomes, partly due to a challenge of following up younger patients. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ABR.

Methods

This study included 32 shoulders (19 males, 13 females; mean age at surgery: 31 years) out of 55 shoulders that underwent ABR at our institution between 2011 and 2019. Inclusion criteria required a minimum follow-up period of 5 years, and data were collected through telephone surveys or direct examinations. The survey assessed recurrent dislocation or subluxation, shoulder pain, apprehension, return to sports (complete, partial, or inability), and revision surgery. Direct examinations included physical assessments and plain x-rays. The Rowe score and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score were assessed. Adjunct data on surgical procedures and intra-articular lesions were also reviewed.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 10 years (range: 6-14 years). Recurrent dislocation occurred in 3 shoulders (10%), and subluxation in 7 shoulders (22%), yielding a total recurrence rate of 28%. Recurrences were associated with sports or traumatic events. Sports return rates were 72% (23 shoulders) for complete return, 16% (5 shoulders) for partial return, and 13% (4 shoulders) for inability (rugby, volleyball, and judo). Shoulder pain (2-3 in numeric rating scale) was reported in 2 shoulders, and apprehension in the abduction and external rotation position was observed in 4 shoulders (13%). The Rowe score significantly improved from 44 ± 8 points (mean ± standard deviation) to 87 ± 21 points (P < .05), and no revision surgeries were performed. Mild to moderate osteoarthritis on X-rays were found in 2 shoulders.

Conclusion

The average 10-year postoperative recurrence rate was 28%, consistent with the previous systematic reviews. While the recurrence rates increased over time, patient satisfaction remained high, and no revision surgeries were required. These findings demonstrate the long-term reliability of ABR for anterior shoulder instability.
腹腔镜Bankart修复(ABR)是治疗肩前脱位的金标准,许多研究表明短期效果良好。然而,很少有报道关注长期结果,部分原因是随访年轻患者的挑战。本研究旨在评估ABR的长期疗效。方法本研究包括2011年至2019年在我院接受ABR手术的55个肩部中的32个肩部(19个男性,13个女性,平均手术年龄:31岁)。纳入标准要求至少随访5年,数据通过电话调查或直接检查收集。调查评估了复发性脱位或半脱位、肩部疼痛、恐惧、恢复运动(完全、部分或无法)和翻修手术。直接检查包括身体评估和普通x光检查。评估Rowe评分和Western Ontario肩部不稳定指数评分。辅助数据的外科手术和关节内病变也进行了审查。结果平均随访10年(6 ~ 14年)。复发脱位3例(10%),半脱位7例(22%),总复发率为28%。复发与运动或创伤事件有关。运动恢复率为完全恢复72%(23个肩膀),部分恢复16%(5个肩膀),不能恢复13%(4个肩膀)(橄榄球、排球和柔道)。肩关节疼痛(2-3分)有2例,外展和外旋位置有4例(13%)。Rowe评分由44±8分(均数±标准差)显著提高至87±21分(P < 0.05),且无翻修手术。在2个肩部x光片上发现轻度至中度骨关节炎。结论术后10年平均复发率为28%,与既往系统综述一致。虽然复发率随着时间的推移而增加,但患者满意度仍然很高,不需要翻修手术。这些发现证明了ABR治疗肩前路不稳的长期可靠性。
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair: a 10-year follow-up study","authors":"Shogo Sugawara MD ,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Yamamoto MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yusuke Koibuchi MD ,&nbsp;Kazuma Sasaki MD ,&nbsp;Rei Kimura MD ,&nbsp;Atsushi Arino MD ,&nbsp;Jun Kawakami MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hideaki Nagamoto MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Toshimi Aizawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Eiji Itoi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is the gold standard for anterior shoulder dislocation, with many studies demonstrating favorable short-term outcomes. However, few reports focus on the long-term outcomes, partly due to a challenge of following up younger patients. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ABR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included 32 shoulders (19 males, 13 females; mean age at surgery: 31 years) out of 55 shoulders that underwent ABR at our institution between 2011 and 2019. Inclusion criteria required a minimum follow-up period of 5 years, and data were collected through telephone surveys or direct examinations. The survey assessed recurrent dislocation or subluxation, shoulder pain, apprehension, return to sports (complete, partial, or inability), and revision surgery. Direct examinations included physical assessments and plain x-rays. The Rowe score and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score were assessed. Adjunct data on surgical procedures and intra-articular lesions were also reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean follow-up period was 10 years (range: 6-14 years). Recurrent dislocation occurred in 3 shoulders (10%), and subluxation in 7 shoulders (22%), yielding a total recurrence rate of 28%. Recurrences were associated with sports or traumatic events. Sports return rates were 72% (23 shoulders) for complete return, 16% (5 shoulders) for partial return, and 13% (4 shoulders) for inability (rugby, volleyball, and judo). Shoulder pain (2-3 in numeric rating scale) was reported in 2 shoulders, and apprehension in the abduction and external rotation position was observed in 4 shoulders (13%). The Rowe score significantly improved from 44 ± 8 points (mean ± standard deviation) to 87 ± 21 points (<em>P</em> &lt; .05), and no revision surgeries were performed. Mild to moderate osteoarthritis on X-rays were found in 2 shoulders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The average 10-year postoperative recurrence rate was 28%, consistent with the previous systematic reviews. While the recurrence rates increased over time, patient satisfaction remained high, and no revision surgeries were required. These findings demonstrate the long-term reliability of ABR for anterior shoulder instability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 1953-1958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (comprehensive system) after failed rotator cuff repair with a medium-term follow-up: comparison with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tear without osteoarthritis 肩袖修复失败后逆行全肩关节置换术(综合系统)中期随访的临床效果:与逆行全肩关节置换术治疗大面积肩袖撕裂无骨关节炎的比较
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.012
Ji Un Kim MD , Ji Young Yoon MD , Young Dae Jeon MD , Hyung Ki Cho MD , Hyeon Jang Jeong MD, PhD , Joo Han Oh MD, PhD

Background

We compared the clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) in patients with massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) without osteoarthritis (OA), secondary rTSA in patients with failed rotator cuff repair (RCR), and primary rTSA in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) as a control group.

Methods

Among 364 patients who underwent rTSA between March 2014 and August 2019, 153 were included. All patients underwent surgery with a single implant type and were followed for a minimum of 4 years. Patients were categorized into three groups: primary rTSA for mRCT without OA (mRCT group, n = 24), primary rTSA for CTA (CTA group, n = 104), and rTSA for failed rotator cuff repair group (fRCR; fRCR group, n = 25). The mean age was 71.5 ± 6.3 (range, 53-83) years, with a mean follow-up of 54.7 ± 12.9 (range, 48-98) months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the active range of motion, the visual analog scale for pain, the simple shoulder test, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and the Constant score at the final follow-up.

Results

All functional outcomes significantly improved postoperatively in each group (P < .05). However, the fRCR group presented worse outcomes compared to the other groups, including visual analog scale for pain (2.1 ± 0.5), forward flexion (126° ± 4°), external rotation (42 ± 4°), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (76 ± 5), and Constant score (55 ± 3) (P < .05). Postoperative complications and radiologic outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (P = .890).

Conclusion

Considering the worse clinical outcomes of secondary rTSA after failed RCR compared to primary rTSA for mRCT without OA and/or CTA, careful selection of appropriate candidates for RCR or primary rTSA as a treatment option for mRCT without OA is essential, according to their healing potential.
我们比较了无骨关节炎(OA)的大量肩袖撕裂(mrct)患者的原发性逆行全肩关节置换术(rTSA)、肩袖修复失败(RCR)患者的继发性全肩关节置换术(rTSA)和作为对照组的肩袖撕裂关节病(CTA)患者的原发性全肩关节置换术(rTSA)的临床结果。方法在2014年3月至2019年8月期间接受rTSA的364例患者中,纳入153例。所有患者都接受了单一种植体类型的手术,并随访了至少4年。患者分为三组:mRCT无OA的原发性rTSA组(mRCT组,n = 24), CTA的原发性rTSA组(CTA组,n = 104),旋转袖修复失败组(fRCR组,n = 25)。平均年龄71.5±6.3岁(53 ~ 83岁),平均随访时间54.7±12.9个月(48 ~ 98个月)。功能结果通过活动度、疼痛视觉模拟量表、简单肩部测试、美国肩肘外科医生评分、手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(Q-DASH)评分和最后随访时的Constant评分来评估。结果两组患者术后各项功能指标均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。然而,与其他组相比,fRCR组表现出更差的结果,包括视觉模拟疼痛量表(2.1±0.5),前屈(126°±4°),外旋(42±4°),美国肩肘外科医生评分(76±5)和Constant评分(55±3)(P < 0.05)。两组术后并发症及影像学结果差异无统计学意义(P = 0.890)。考虑到RCR失败后继发rTSA的临床结果比mRCT无OA和/或CTA的原发性rTSA更差,根据其愈合潜力,仔细选择适当的RCR或原发性rTSA作为mRCT无OA的治疗方案至关重要。
{"title":"Clinical outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (comprehensive system) after failed rotator cuff repair with a medium-term follow-up: comparison with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tear without osteoarthritis","authors":"Ji Un Kim MD ,&nbsp;Ji Young Yoon MD ,&nbsp;Young Dae Jeon MD ,&nbsp;Hyung Ki Cho MD ,&nbsp;Hyeon Jang Jeong MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Joo Han Oh MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We compared the clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) in patients with massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) without osteoarthritis (OA), secondary rTSA in patients with failed rotator cuff repair (RCR), and primary rTSA in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) as a control group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Among 364 patients who underwent rTSA between March 2014 and August 2019, 153 were included. All patients underwent surgery with a single implant type and were followed for a minimum of 4 years. Patients were categorized into three groups: primary rTSA for mRCT without OA (mRCT group, n = 24), primary rTSA for CTA (CTA group, n = 104), and rTSA for failed rotator cuff repair group (fRCR; fRCR group, n = 25). The mean age was 71.5 ± 6.3 (range, 53-83) years, with a mean follow-up of 54.7 ± 12.9 (range, 48-98) months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the active range of motion, the visual analog scale for pain, the simple shoulder test, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and the Constant score at the final follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All functional outcomes significantly improved postoperatively in each group (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). However, the fRCR group presented worse outcomes compared to the other groups, including visual analog scale for pain (2.1 ± 0.5), forward flexion (126° ± 4°), external rotation (42 ± 4°), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (76 ± 5), and Constant score (55 ± 3) (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Postoperative complications and radiologic outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (<em>P</em> = .890).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Considering the worse clinical outcomes of secondary rTSA after failed RCR compared to primary rTSA for mRCT without OA and/or CTA, careful selection of appropriate candidates for RCR or primary rTSA as a treatment option for mRCT without OA is essential, according to their healing potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2081-2086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in primary shoulder arthroplasty patients: a systematic review 原发性肩关节置换术患者术前抗生素预防:系统回顾
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.010
Kevin C. Liu MD, Justin T. Jabara MD, Miguel A. Lizarraga BS, Andrew P. Gatto DO, Brian Feeley MD

Background

Cefazolin is the primary antibiotic used for prevention of shoulder arthroplasty (SA) infection. However, vancomycin, clindamycin, and doxycycline may be used, specifically for patients with penicillin allergies or known bacterial colonization. Due to limited existing data, the aim of this systematic review was to characterize contemporary antibiotic prophylaxis choices and report infection rates based on the prophylactic regimen in patients undergoing SA.

Methods

The online databases CINAHL Complete, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to September 25, 2024. Clinical studies comparing preoperative antibiotic regimens and reporting postoperative complications were included. Nonrandomized and randomized studies were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool and the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, respectively.

Results

The search strategy identified 7 eligible studies, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 5 were retrospective series, including 33,159 procedures (hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and humeral head arthroplasty). The most commonly used antibiotic was cefazolin. All-cause infection rates ranged from 1.0%-1.1% for cefazolin, 1.1%-2.4% for vancomycin, and 3.2%-4.1% for clindamycin. One randomized controlled trial found no significant reduction in intraoperative culture positivity rates with the addition of doxycycline to cefazolin.

Conclusion

Cefazolin is the preferred antibiotic prophylaxis for SA, with vancomycin and clindamycin as viable alternatives. Future investigations could evaluate the benefit of dual antibiotic therapy and develop evidence-based treatment algorithms for high-risk patients who may require non–cefazolin prophylaxis.
背景:头孢唑林是用于预防肩关节置换术(SA)感染的主要抗生素。然而,万古霉素、克林霉素和强力霉素可以使用,特别是对青霉素过敏或已知细菌定植的患者。由于现有数据有限,本系统综述的目的是描述当代抗生素预防选择,并报告基于预防方案的SA患者感染率。方法检索自建库至2024年9月25日的在线数据库CINAHL Complete、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials和Web of Science。临床研究比较术前抗生素方案和报告术后并发症。非随机研究和随机研究分别使用非随机研究方法学指数(Methodological Index for non - random studies)和修订后的Cochrane Risk of Bias 2工具进行评估。结果检索策略确定了7项符合条件的研究,其中2项为随机对照试验,5项为回顾性研究,包括33,159例手术(半关节置换术、解剖性全肩关节置换术、反向全肩关节置换术和肱骨头置换术)。最常用的抗生素是头孢唑林。头孢唑林的全因感染率为1.0% ~ 1.1%,万古霉素为1.1% ~ 2.4%,克林霉素为3.2% ~ 4.1%。一项随机对照试验发现,在头孢唑林中加入强力霉素后,术中培养阳性率没有显著降低。结论头孢唑林是预防SA的首选抗生素,万古霉素和克林霉素是可行的选择。未来的研究可以评估双重抗生素治疗的益处,并为可能需要非头孢唑林预防的高危患者制定循证治疗算法。
{"title":"Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in primary shoulder arthroplasty patients: a systematic review","authors":"Kevin C. Liu MD,&nbsp;Justin T. Jabara MD,&nbsp;Miguel A. Lizarraga BS,&nbsp;Andrew P. Gatto DO,&nbsp;Brian Feeley MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cefazolin is the primary antibiotic used for prevention of shoulder arthroplasty (SA) infection. However, vancomycin, clindamycin, and doxycycline may be used, specifically for patients with penicillin allergies or known bacterial colonization. Due to limited existing data, the aim of this systematic review was to characterize contemporary antibiotic prophylaxis choices and report infection rates based on the prophylactic regimen in patients undergoing SA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The online databases CINAHL Complete, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to September 25, 2024. Clinical studies comparing preoperative antibiotic regimens and reporting postoperative complications were included. Nonrandomized and randomized studies were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool and the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search strategy identified 7 eligible studies, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 5 were retrospective series, including 33,159 procedures (hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and humeral head arthroplasty). The most commonly used antibiotic was cefazolin. All-cause infection rates ranged from 1.0%-1.1% for cefazolin, 1.1%-2.4% for vancomycin, and 3.2%-4.1% for clindamycin. One randomized controlled trial found no significant reduction in intraoperative culture positivity rates with the addition of doxycycline to cefazolin.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cefazolin is the preferred antibiotic prophylaxis for SA, with vancomycin and clindamycin as viable alternatives. Future investigations could evaluate the benefit of dual antibiotic therapy and develop evidence-based treatment algorithms for high-risk patients who may require non–cefazolin prophylaxis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 2062-2068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concomitant biceps intervention does not affect the outcome in the treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tear 二头肌联合干预不影响治疗部分厚度肩袖撕裂的结果
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.038
Keigo Honoki MD , Jarret Woodmass MD , Sarah Harris BSc Eng , Afsana Hasan MD , Rodrigo Brandariz MD , Peter MacDonald MD

Background

Although procedures for long head of biceps (LHB), including LHB tenotomy and tenodesis, are commonly performed for patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT), the data about concomitant biceps procedures in the treatment of partial-thickness (PT) RCT has been limited.

Methods

Retrospective data were provided by the institutional Pan Am Clinic Orthopedic Surgery registry. The single surgical center collects surgeon- and patient-reported data for all arthroscopic surgeries as standard of care. Patients who underwent shoulder surgery for PT-RCT between April 2019 and August 2022 were included in this study. All patients were eligible for 1-year follow-up. Demographic, operative, and patient-reported outcomes were compared for patients treated with and without concomitant LHB intervention. Subanalyses compared patients treated with biceps tenotomy and biceps tenodesis. Operative data included LHB and RCT condition at the time of surgery, and outcomes included revision status, complications and the patient-reported outcomes American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. Continuous variables were compared using a two-sided independent t-test, and categorical variables were compared using a chi-squared or Fisher's exact test.

Results

The rate of LHB pathology including inflammation, partial tear, or rupture associated with PT-RCT was 58% (n = 66/113). Fifty-six percent (n = 63/113) of the patients treated for partial supraspinatus tendon tear underwent concomitant LHB intervention (Group I), and 44% (n = 50/113) did not undergo LHB intervention (Group N). The mean age of study patients was 54 years (standard deviation = 12), and 37% were female (male n = 71; female n = 42). Within Group I, 48% (n = 30/63) underwent tenotomy and 52% (n = 33/63) underwent tenodesis. LHB condition at the time of surgery was different between Group N and Group I (Fisher's exact P < .001) and between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups (Fisher's exact P < .001). No other significant differences were found in operative variables or patient-reported variables preoperatively or at the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Concomitant biceps intervention does not affect the clinical outcome in arthroscopic shoulder surgery for PT-RCT. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between LHB tenodesis and tenotomy in the treatment of arthroscopic PT-RCT when LHB intervention was performed.
背景:虽然肱二头肌长头(LHB)手术,包括LHB肌腱切开术和肌腱固定术,通常用于肩袖撕裂(RCT)患者,但在治疗部分厚度(PT) RCT时,肱二头肌手术的相关数据有限。方法回顾性资料由泛美诊所骨科注册中心提供。单一手术中心收集所有关节镜手术的外科医生和患者报告的数据作为标准护理。在2019年4月至2022年8月期间接受PT-RCT肩部手术的患者被纳入本研究。所有患者均符合1年随访条件。对合并和未合并LHB干预的患者进行人口统计学、手术和患者报告的结果进行比较。亚分析比较了二头肌肌腱切断术和二头肌肌腱固定术的患者。手术数据包括手术时的LHB和RCT情况,结果包括翻修状态、并发症和患者报告的结果美国肩肘外科医生和单一评估数字评估评分。连续变量的比较采用双侧独立t检验,分类变量的比较采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。结果与PT-RCT相关的LHB病理包括炎症、部分撕裂或破裂的比例为58% (n = 66/113)。56% (n = 63/113)的冈上肌腱部分撕裂患者同时进行了LHB干预(I组),44% (n = 50/113)的患者未进行LHB干预(n组)。研究患者的平均年龄为54岁(标准差为12),其中37%为女性(男性71例,女性42例)。在第一组中,48% (n = 30/63)的患者行肌腱切开术,52% (n = 33/63)行肌腱固定术。手术时LHB情况在N组和I组之间存在差异(Fisher's精确P <; 0.001),在肌腱切开术组和肌腱固定术组之间存在差异(Fisher's精确P <; 0.001)。术前或1年随访时,在手术变量或患者报告变量方面未发现其他显著差异。结论肩关节镜下PT-RCT联合肱二头肌干预不影响临床疗效。在进行LHB干预的关节镜下PT-RCT治疗中,LHB肌腱固定术与肌腱切断术的临床结果无显著差异。
{"title":"Concomitant biceps intervention does not affect the outcome in the treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tear","authors":"Keigo Honoki MD ,&nbsp;Jarret Woodmass MD ,&nbsp;Sarah Harris BSc Eng ,&nbsp;Afsana Hasan MD ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Brandariz MD ,&nbsp;Peter MacDonald MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.038","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.038","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although procedures for long head of biceps (LHB), including LHB tenotomy and tenodesis, are commonly performed for patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT), the data about concomitant biceps procedures in the treatment of partial-thickness (PT) RCT has been limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective data were provided by the institutional Pan Am Clinic Orthopedic Surgery registry. The single surgical center collects surgeon- and patient-reported data for all arthroscopic surgeries as standard of care. Patients who underwent shoulder surgery for PT-RCT between April 2019 and August 2022 were included in this study. All patients were eligible for 1-year follow-up. Demographic, operative, and patient-reported outcomes were compared for patients treated with and without concomitant LHB intervention. Subanalyses compared patients treated with biceps tenotomy and biceps tenodesis. Operative data included LHB and RCT condition at the time of surgery, and outcomes included revision status, complications and the patient-reported outcomes American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. Continuous variables were compared using a two-sided independent <em>t</em>-test, and categorical variables were compared using a chi-squared or Fisher's exact test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The rate of LHB pathology including inflammation, partial tear, or rupture associated with PT-RCT was 58% (n = 66/113). Fifty-six percent (n = 63/113) of the patients treated for partial supraspinatus tendon tear underwent concomitant LHB intervention (Group I), and 44% (n = 50/113) did not undergo LHB intervention (Group N). The mean age of study patients was 54 years (standard deviation = 12), and 37% were female (male n = 71; female n = 42). Within Group I, 48% (n = 30/63) underwent tenotomy and 52% (n = 33/63) underwent tenodesis. LHB condition at the time of surgery was different between Group N and Group I (Fisher's exact <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups (Fisher's exact <em>P</em> &lt; .001). No other significant differences were found in operative variables or patient-reported variables preoperatively or at the 1-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Concomitant biceps intervention does not affect the clinical outcome in arthroscopic shoulder surgery for PT-RCT. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between LHB tenodesis and tenotomy in the treatment of arthroscopic PT-RCT when LHB intervention was performed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 1994-1998"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors for coracoclavicular reconstruction failure: a systematic review 喙锁骨重建失败的危险因素:系统回顾
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.007
Braeden R. Gooch BS , Josh W. Thibeault BS , Charles R. Reiter BS , Matthew S. Smith MD , Joshua C. Setliff MD , John W. Cyrus MS , James R. Satalich MD , J. Brett Goodloe MD , Jennifer L. Vanderbeck MD

Background

The coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular injuries is performed through a variety of surgical techniques and fixation methods. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk factors associated with failure of CC reconstruction, regardless of the fixation method used.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched through November 2024 for studies analyzing the failures of CC reconstructive surgery. Studies that quantified risk factors for CC reconstruction failure were included.

Results

Seven studies comprising 781 CC reconstructions were analyzed with an overall failure rate of 19.1%. Clavicle tunnel malposition in anatomic reconstructions was the most cited risk factor for failure. Position was defined as either the distance from the lateral aspect of the clavicle to the tunnels or as a ratio between this distance and the length of the clavicle. Three studies cited increased failure risk with medial malposition of the conoid or trapezoid tunnels. Specific parameters included conoid tunnel ratio >0.25, (odds ratio (OR) = 5.67), trapezoid ratio >0.15 (OR = 4.2), conoid tunnel >47 mm (OR = 4.67), and trapezoid tunnel >24 mm (OR = 4.2). Lateral conoid tunnel malposition with a conoid tunnel ratio <0.20 (OR = 40) was also noted to increase failure risk. Another study identified increased risk of failure when surgeons use tunnel ratios instead of tunnel distance in mm intraoperatively (OR = 4.609). Placement of a lateral coracoid button, as opposed to a central button, was cited in 2 studies as significant risk factors (OR = 9.614, 13.87). Other risk factors included osteoporosis (OR = 8.652), weight-bearing before 6 weeks from surgery (OR = 6.4), surgery >6 weeks from initial injury (OR = 2.65), osteolysis (OR = 4.386), patient age >40 (OR = 3.14), and open reconstruction (OR = 4.25).

Conclusions

Conoid and trapezoid tunnel malposition, both medially and laterally, were significantly associated with an increased risk of failure. Additionally, patient age, osteoporosis, osteolysis, time to weight bearing after surgery, delayed presentation of more than 6 weeks from initial injury, should be considered when considering surgical intervention.
肩锁损伤的喙锁韧带重建是通过多种手术技术和固定方法进行的。本研究的目的是确定与CC重建失败相关的危险因素,无论采用何种固定方法。方法按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。Medline, Embase和Cochrane检索了截止2024年11月CC重建手术失败的研究。量化CC重建失败危险因素的研究被纳入。结果7项研究共781例CC重构,总体失败率为19.1%。解剖重建中锁骨隧道错位是最常见的失败危险因素。位置被定义为从锁骨侧面到隧道的距离或者是这个距离和锁骨长度的比值。三项研究指出,锥形或梯形隧道内侧错位会增加手术失败的风险。具体参数包括锥面隧道比>;0.25(优势比(OR) = 5.67)、梯形比>;0.15 (OR = 4.2)、锥面隧道>;47 mm (OR = 4.67)、梯形隧道>;24 mm (OR = 4.2)。侧锥体隧道错位与锥体隧道比率<;0.20 (OR = 40)也会增加失败风险。另一项研究发现,当外科医生术中使用隧道比率而不是隧道距离(OR = 4.609)时,失败的风险增加。在2项研究中,侧边喙扣的位置,而不是中央喙扣的位置,被引用为重要的危险因素(OR = 9.614, 13.87)。其他危险因素包括骨质疏松症(OR = 8.652)、手术前6周负重(OR = 6.4)、手术后6周损伤(OR = 2.65)、骨溶解(OR = 4.386)、患者年龄(OR = 3.14)、开放性重建(OR = 4.25)。结论锥形和梯形隧道的内外侧错位与手术失败的风险显著相关。此外,在考虑手术干预时,应考虑患者的年龄、骨质疏松症、骨溶解、手术后的负重时间、从初始损伤延迟出现超过6周。
{"title":"Risk factors for coracoclavicular reconstruction failure: a systematic review","authors":"Braeden R. Gooch BS ,&nbsp;Josh W. Thibeault BS ,&nbsp;Charles R. Reiter BS ,&nbsp;Matthew S. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Joshua C. Setliff MD ,&nbsp;John W. Cyrus MS ,&nbsp;James R. Satalich MD ,&nbsp;J. Brett Goodloe MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Vanderbeck MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular injuries is performed through a variety of surgical techniques and fixation methods. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk factors associated with failure of CC reconstruction, regardless of the fixation method used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched through November 2024 for studies analyzing the failures of CC reconstructive surgery. Studies that quantified risk factors for CC reconstruction failure were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven studies comprising 781 CC reconstructions were analyzed with an overall failure rate of 19.1%. Clavicle tunnel malposition in anatomic reconstructions was the most cited risk factor for failure. Position was defined as either the distance from the lateral aspect of the clavicle to the tunnels or as a ratio between this distance and the length of the clavicle. Three studies cited increased failure risk with medial malposition of the conoid or trapezoid tunnels. Specific parameters included conoid tunnel ratio &gt;0.25, (odds ratio (OR) = 5.67), trapezoid ratio &gt;0.15 (OR = 4.2), conoid tunnel &gt;47 mm (OR = 4.67), and trapezoid tunnel &gt;24 mm (OR = 4.2). Lateral conoid tunnel malposition with a conoid tunnel ratio &lt;0.20 (OR = 40) was also noted to increase failure risk. Another study identified increased risk of failure when surgeons use tunnel ratios instead of tunnel distance in mm intraoperatively (OR = 4.609). Placement of a lateral coracoid button, as opposed to a central button, was cited in 2 studies as significant risk factors (OR = 9.614, 13.87). Other risk factors included osteoporosis (OR = 8.652), weight-bearing before 6 weeks from surgery (OR = 6.4), surgery &gt;6 weeks from initial injury (OR = 2.65), osteolysis (OR = 4.386), patient age &gt;40 (OR = 3.14), and open reconstruction (OR = 4.25).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Conoid and trapezoid tunnel malposition, both medially and laterally, were significantly associated with an increased risk of failure. Additionally, patient age, osteoporosis, osteolysis, time to weight bearing after surgery, delayed presentation of more than 6 weeks from initial injury, should be considered when considering surgical intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 1965-1971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSES International
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1