Pub Date : 2018-09-09DOI: 10.18523/2617-16781141923
N. Pavlyk, Maryna Mudrak
{"title":"The Oriental Studies Circle in NaUKMA: history and present time","authors":"N. Pavlyk, Maryna Mudrak","doi":"10.18523/2617-16781141923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-16781141923","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34696,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85555085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-09-09DOI: 10.18523/2617-16781141916
I. Bondarevska
The article analyzes the main aspects of the interpretation of philosophical thinking by the Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowskі (1927–2009). He is more known as a brilliant disputant on the history of Marxism and the prospects for the further development of Marxist theory, but his thoughts on the nature and functions of philosophical thinking in the broadest sense are of no less importance, since they address the painful issue of the autonomy of thinking. The purpose of the article is to reconstruct the principles that, according to the philosopher, would allow thinking to maintain its autonomy under the pressure of ideas and ideologies. Utopia and nihilism in the interpretation of L. Kolakowskі appear as temptations of the modern world. It is in the quest for defending from these “monsters” (L. Kolakowskі) that the philosopher comes to the conclusion that the basis of utopia and nihilism are certain ideas about the truth. Through the prism of this theoretical discovery, he reveals the importance of consensus, tolerance, compromise, and non-consistency (inconsistency) as epistemological tools of support or undermining of ideologies. The basic epistemological model the philosopher used has been reproduced by means of theoretical reconstruction. This is the attitude of the subject to the truth, which is realized in two ways: to either master the truth on the basis of certain beliefs or neglect the truth on the basis of other beliefs. With the help of this model, the philosopher comes to understanding that dogmatism and unification are not only utopian diseases but also nihilists. The reason for this is loyalty to one’s own truth, that is, thinking without gaps based on unchanging principles and aimed at reproducing certain institutional and social constants. Instead, inconsistency as a principle forms a completely different setting, the advantage of which is that it extends to itself and frees a thinker from the need to be or not to be consistent, but does not relieve the search of truth and meaning, without which human existence is impossible, according to L. Kolakowskі. The reconstruction was carried out on the basis of analysis of articles and essays of various years, combined with the development of concepts of utopia and nihilism as alternative projects of human existence, rooted in the epistemological directions of the subject. Article received 27.02.2018
{"title":"Utopia and nihilism: Leszek Kolakowski’s philosophical lessons","authors":"I. Bondarevska","doi":"10.18523/2617-16781141916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-16781141916","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the main aspects of the interpretation of philosophical thinking by the Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowskі (1927–2009). He is more known as a brilliant disputant on the history of Marxism and the prospects for the further development of Marxist theory, but his thoughts on the nature and functions of philosophical thinking in the broadest sense are of no less importance, since they address the painful issue of the autonomy of thinking. The purpose of the article is to reconstruct the principles that, according to the philosopher, would allow thinking to maintain its autonomy under the pressure of ideas and ideologies. Utopia and nihilism in the interpretation of L. Kolakowskі appear as temptations of the modern world. It is in the quest for defending from these “monsters” (L. Kolakowskі) that the philosopher comes to the conclusion that the basis of utopia and nihilism are certain ideas about the truth. Through the prism of this theoretical discovery, he reveals the importance of consensus, tolerance, compromise, and non-consistency (inconsistency) as epistemological tools of support or undermining of ideologies. The basic epistemological model the philosopher used has been reproduced by means of theoretical reconstruction. This is the attitude of the subject to the truth, which is realized in two ways: to either master the truth on the basis of certain beliefs or neglect the truth on the basis of other beliefs. With the help of this model, the philosopher comes to understanding that dogmatism and unification are not only utopian diseases but also nihilists. The reason for this is loyalty to one’s own truth, that is, thinking without gaps based on unchanging principles and aimed at reproducing certain institutional and social constants. Instead, inconsistency as a principle forms a completely different setting, the advantage of which is that it extends to itself and frees a thinker from the need to be or not to be consistent, but does not relieve the search of truth and meaning, without which human existence is impossible, according to L. Kolakowskі. The reconstruction was carried out on the basis of analysis of articles and essays of various years, combined with the development of concepts of utopia and nihilism as alternative projects of human existence, rooted in the epistemological directions of the subject. Article received 27.02.2018","PeriodicalId":34696,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73524894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-09-09DOI: 10.18523/2617-16781141918
L. Pastushenko
У статті здійснено аналіз історико-філософської концепції Петра Кудрявцева в контексті основних тенденцій та орієнтирів розвитку історико-філософської науки в Європі ХІХ – початку ХХ ст. Автор з’ясовує специфіку оригінального підходу П. Кудрявцева до розуміння історико-філософського процесу, сформованого на підставі творчого переосмислення протилежних раціоналістичної та емпіричної (позитивістської) моделей історико-філософського пізнання. У статті доведено схожість історико-філософських поглядів київського мислителя з ідейними настановами представників післягеґелівської історико-філософської традиції (В. Віндельбанда, К. Фішера). Реконструюючи зміст історико-філософської концепції П. Кудрявцева, зроблено висновок про те, що концепція київського мислителя, з одного боку, увиразнює стрижневу для західноєвропейської філософії на зламі ХІХ–ХХ ст. ціннісну проблематику, з другого – має за мету протистояння панівним у сучасній європейській філософії релятивістським та нігілістичним тенденціям. Матеріал надійшов 26.02.2018
{"title":"European context of Petro Kudriavtsev’s historical-philosophical conception","authors":"L. Pastushenko","doi":"10.18523/2617-16781141918","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-16781141918","url":null,"abstract":"У статті здійснено аналіз історико-філософської концепції Петра Кудрявцева в контексті основних тенденцій та орієнтирів розвитку історико-філософської науки в Європі ХІХ – початку ХХ ст. Автор з’ясовує специфіку оригінального підходу П. Кудрявцева до розуміння історико-філософського процесу, сформованого на підставі творчого переосмислення протилежних раціоналістичної та емпіричної (позитивістської) моделей історико-філософського пізнання. У статті доведено схожість історико-філософських поглядів київського мислителя з ідейними настановами представників післягеґелівської історико-філософської традиції (В. Віндельбанда, К. Фішера). Реконструюючи зміст історико-філософської концепції П. Кудрявцева, зроблено висновок про те, що концепція київського мислителя, з одного боку, увиразнює стрижневу для західноєвропейської філософії на зламі ХІХ–ХХ ст. ціннісну проблематику, з другого – має за мету протистояння панівним у сучасній європейській філософії релятивістським та нігілістичним тенденціям. Матеріал надійшов 26.02.2018","PeriodicalId":34696,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87645905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-09-09DOI: 10.18523/2617-16781141915
Liudmyla Rechych
{"title":"How to read author: meditation on method","authors":"Liudmyla Rechych","doi":"10.18523/2617-16781141915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-16781141915","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34696,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73881984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-09-09DOI: 10.18523/2617-16781141911
Dmytro Mykhailov
{"title":"Philosophical and anthropological studies in NaUKMA: the problem of human as a moral and ethical being","authors":"Dmytro Mykhailov","doi":"10.18523/2617-16781141911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-16781141911","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34696,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","volume":"432 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76648318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：