Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing最新文献

Accurate prediction of suicide risk is crucial for identifying patients with elevated risk burden, helping ensure these patients receive targeted care. The US Department of Veteran Affairs' suicide prediction model primarily leverages structured electronic health records (EHR) data. This approach largely overlooks unstructured EHR, a data format that could be utilized to enhance predictive accuracy. This study aims to enhance suicide risk models' predictive accuracy by developing a model that incorporates both structured EHR predictors and semantic NLP-derived variables from unstructured EHR. XGBoost models were fit to predict suicide risk- the interactions identified by the model were extracted using SHAP, validated using logistic regression models, added to a ridge regression model, which was subsequently compared to a ridge regression approach without the use of interactions. By introducing a selection parameter, α, to balance the influence of structured (α=1) and unstructured (α=0) data, we found that intermediate α values achieved optimal performance across various risk strata, improved model performance of the ridge regression approach and uncovered significant cross-modal interactions between psychosocial constructs and patient characteristics. These interactions highlight how psychosocial risk factors are influenced by individual patient contexts, potentially informing improved risk prediction methods and personalized interventions. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating nuanced narrative data into predictive models and set the stage for future research that will expand the use of advanced machine learning techniques, including deep learning, to further refine suicide risk prediction methods.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that results in progressive cognitive decline but without any clinically validated cures so far. Understanding the progression of AD is critical for early detection and risk assessment for AD in aging individuals, thereby enabling initiation of timely intervention and improved chance of success in AD trials. Recent pseudotime approach turns cross-sectional data into "faux" longitudinal data to understand how a complex process evolves over time. This is critical for Alzheimer, which unfolds over the course of decades, but the collected data offers only a snapshot. In this study, we tested several state-of-the-art pseudotime approaches to model the full spectrum of AD progression. Subsequently, we evaluated and compared the pseudotime progression score derived from individual imaging modalities and multi-modalities in the ADNI cohort. Our results showed that most existing pseudotime analysis tools do not generalize well to the imaging data, with either flipped progression score or poor separation of diagnosis groups. This is likely due to the underlying assumptions that only stand for single cell data. From the only tool with promising results, it was observed that all pseudotime, derived from either single imaging modalities or multi-modalities, captures the progressiveness of diagnosis groups. Pseudotime from multi-modality, but not the single modalities, confirmed the hypothetical temporal order of imaging phenotypes. In addition, we found that multi-modal pseudotime is mostly driven by amyloid and tau imaging, suggesting their continuous changes along the full spectrum of AD progression.

The following sections are included: Overview, Advancing multi-ancestry genetic research, Integrating social determinants of health to enhance genetic risk models, Methods to detect and mitigate disparities, Addressing Disparities in Adverse Drug Reactions, Conclusion, Acknowledgments,References.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly capable of processing complex and multilayered datasets. Innovations in generative AI and deep learning have notably enhanced the extraction of insights from both unstructured texts, images, and structured data alike. These breakthroughs in AI technology have spurred a wave of research in the medical field, leading to the creation of a variety of tools aimed at improving clinical decision-making, patient monitoring, image analysis, and emergency response systems. However, thorough research is essential to fully understand the broader impact and potential consequences of deploying AI within the healthcare sector.

Pharmacogenetics represents one of the most promising areas of precision medicine, with several guidelines for genetics-guided treatment ready for clinical use. Despite this, implementation has been slow, with few health systems incorporating the technology into their standard of care. One major barrier to uptake is the lack of education and awareness of pharmacogenetics among clinicians and patients. The introduction of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 has raised the possibility of medical chatbots that deliver timely information to clinicians, patients, and researchers with a simple interface. Although state-of-the-art LLMs have shown impressive performance at advanced tasks like medical licensing exams, in practice they still often provide false information, which is particularly hazardous in a clinical context. To quantify the extent of this issue, we developed a series of automated and expert-scored tests to evaluate the performance of chatbots in answering pharmacogenetics questions from the perspective of clinicians, patients, and researchers. We applied this benchmark to state-of-the-art LLMs and found that newer models like GPT-4o greatly outperform their predecessors, but still fall short of the standards required for clinical use. Our benchmark will be a valuable public resource for subsequent developments in this space as we work towards better clinical AI for pharmacogenetics.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms showcase the potential to steer a paradigm shift in clinical medicine, especially medical imaging. Concerns associated with model generalizability and biases necessitate rigorous external validation of AI algorithms prior to their adoption into clinical workflows. To address the barriers associated with patient privacy, intellectual property, and diverse model requirements, we introduce ClinValAI, a framework for establishing robust cloud-based infrastructures to clinically validate AI algorithms in medical imaging. By featuring dedicated workflows for data ingestion, algorithm scoring, and output processing, we propose an easily customizable method to assess AI models and investigate biases. Our novel orchestration mechanism facilitates utilizing the complete potential of the cloud computing environment. ClinValAI's input auditing and standardization mechanisms ensure that inputs consistent with model prerequisites are provided to the algorithm for a streamlined validation. The scoring workflow comprises multiple steps to facilitate consistent inferencing and systematic troubleshooting. The output processing workflow helps identify and analyze samples with missing results and aggregates final outputs for downstream analysis. We demonstrate the usability of our work by evaluating a state-of-the-art breast cancer risk prediction algorithm on a large and diverse dataset of 2D screening mammograms. We perform comprehensive statistical analysis to study model calibration and evaluate performance on important factors, including breast density, age, and race, to identify latent biases. ClinValAI provides a holistic framework to validate medical imaging models and has the potential to advance the development of generalizable AI models in clinical medicine and promote health equity.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant promise across a wide array of fields, including biomedical research, but face notable limitations in their current applications. While they offer a new paradigm for data analysis and hypothesis generation, their efficacy in computational biology trails other applications such as natural language processing. This workshop addresses the state of the art in LLMs, discussing their challenges and the potential for future development tailored to computational biology. Key issues include difficulties in validating LLM outputs, proprietary model limitations, and the need for expertise in critical evaluation of model failure modes.

Gene-environment interaction (GxE) studies provide insights into the interplay between genetics and the environment but often overlook multiple environmental factors' synergistic effects. This study encompasses the use of environment by environment interaction (ExE) studies to explore interactions among environmental factors affecting lipid phenotypes (e.g., HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol, and triglycerides), which are crucial for disease risk assessment. We developed a novel curated knowledge base, GE.db, integrating genomic and exposomic interactions. In this study, we filtered NHANES exposure variables (available 1999-2018) to identify significant ExE using GE.db. From 101,316 participants and 77 exposures, we identified 263 statistically significant interactions (FDR p < 0.1) in discovery and replication datasets, with 21 interactions significant for HDL-C (Bonferroni p < 0.05). Notable interactions included docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n-3) (DPA) - arachidic acid (20:0), stearic acid (18:0) - arachidic acid (20:0), and blood 2,5-dimethyfuran - blood benzene associated with HDL-C levels. These findings underscore GE.db's role in enhancing -omics research efficiency and highlight the complex impact of environmental exposures on lipid metabolism, informing future health strategies.

We present a comparative study on the performance of two popular open-source large language models for early prediction of sepsis: Llama-3 8B and Mixtral 8x7B. The primary goal was to determine whether a smaller model could achieve comparable predictive accuracy to a significantly larger model in the context of sepsis prediction using clinical data.Our proposed LLM-based sepsis prediction system, COMPOSER-LLM, enhances the previously published COMPOSER model, which utilizes structured EHR data to generate hourly sepsis risk scores. The new system incorporates an LLM-based approach to extract sepsis-related clinical signs and symptoms from unstructured clinical notes. For scores falling within high-uncertainty prediction regions, particularly those near the decision threshold, the system uses the LLM to draw additional clinical context from patient notes; thereby enhancing the model's predictive accuracy in challenging diagnostic scenarios.A total of 2,074 patient encounters admitted to the Emergency Department at two hospitals within the University of California San Diego Health system were used for model evaluation in this study. Our findings reveal that the Llama-3 8B model based system (COMPOSER-LLMLlama) achieved a sensitivity of 70.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 32.5%, F-1 score of 44.4% and false alarms per patient hour (FAPH) of 0.0194, closely matching the performance of the larger Mixtral 8x7B model based system (COMPOSER-LLMmixtral) which achieved a sensitivity of 72.1%, PPV of 31.9%, F-1 score of 44.2% and FAPH of 0.020. When prospectively evaluated, COMPOSER-LLMLlama demonstrated similar performance to the COMPOSER-LLMmixtral pipeline, with a sensitivity of 68.7%, PPV of 36.6%, F-1 score of 47.7% and FAPH of 0.019 vs. sensitivity of 70.5%, PPV of 36.3%, F-1 score of 47.9% and FAPH of 0.020. This result indicates that, for extraction of clinical signs and symptoms from unstructured clinical notes to enable early prediction of sepsis, the Llama-3 generation of smaller language models can perform as effectively and more efficiently than larger models. This finding has significant implications for healthcare settings with limited resources.

Uterine leiomyomata, or fibroids, are common gynecological tumors causing pelvic and menstrual symptoms that can negatively affect quality of life and child-bearing desires. As fibroids grow, symptoms can intensify and lead to invasive treatments that are less likely to preserve fertility. Identifying individuals at highest risk for fibroids can aid in access to earlier diagnoses. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) quantify genetic risk to identify those at highest risk for disease. Utilizing the PRS software PRS-CSx and publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from FinnGen and Biobank Japan, we constructed a multi-ancestry (META) PRS for fibroids. We validated the META PRS in two cross-ancestry cohorts. In the cross-ancestry Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network cohort, the META PRS was significantly associated with fibroid status and exhibited 1.11 greater odds for fibroids per standard deviation increase in PRS (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 - 1.17, p = 5.21x10-5). The META PRS was validated in two BioVU cohorts: one using ICD9/ICD10 codes and one requiring imaging confirmation of fibroid status. In the ICD cohort, a standard deviation increase in the META PRS increased the odds of fibroids by 1.23 (95% CI: 1.15 - 1.32, p = 9.68x10-9), while in the imaging cohort, the odds increased by 1.26 (95% CI: 1.18 - 1.35, p = 2.40x10-11). We subsequently constructed single ancestry PRS for FinnGen (European ancestry [EUR]) and Biobank Japan (East Asian ancestry [EAS]) using PRS-CS and discovered a nominally significant association in the eMERGE cohort within fibroids and EAS PRS but not EUR PRS (95% CI: 1.09 - 1.20, p = 1.64x10-7). These findings highlight the strong predictive power of multi-ancestry PRS over single ancestry PRS. This study underscores the necessity of diverse population inclusion in genetic research to ensure precision medicine benefits all individuals equitably.