Abnormal miRNA expression has been evidenced to be directly linked to HCC initiation and progression. This study was designed to detect possible prognostic, diagnostic, and/or therapeutic miRNAs for HCC using computational analysis of miRNAs expression. Methods: miRNA expression datasets meta-analysis was performed using the YM500v2 server to compare miRNA expression in normal and cancerous liver tissues. The most significant differentially regulated miRNAs in our study undergone target gene analysis using the mirWalk tool to obtain their validated and predicted targets. The combinatorial target prediction tool; miRror Suite was used to obtain the commonly regulated target genes. Functional enrichment analysis was performed on the resulting targets using the DAVID tool. A network was constructed based on interactions among microRNAs, their targets, and transcription factors. Hub nodes and gatekeepers were identified using network topological analysis. Further, we performed patient data survival analysis based on low and high expression of identified hubs and gatekeeper nodes, patients were stratified into low and high survival probability groups. Results: Using the meta-analysis option in the YM500v2 server, 34 miRNAs were found to be significantly differentially regulated (P-value ⩽ .05); 5 miRNAs were down-regulated while 29 were up-regulated. The validated and predicted target genes for each miRNA, as well as the combinatorially predicted targets, were obtained. DAVID enrichment analysis resulted in several important cellular functions that are directly related to the main cancer hallmarks. Among these functions are focal adhesion, cell cycle, PI3K-Akt signaling, insulin signaling, Ras and MAPK signaling pathways. Several hub genes and gatekeepers were found that could serve as potential drug targets for hepatocellular carcinoma. POU2F1 and PPARA showed a significant difference between low and high survival probabilities (P-value ⩽ .05) in HCC patients. Our study sheds light on important biomarker miRNAs for hepatocellular carcinoma along with their target genes and their regulated functions.
Introduction: In the era of big data, gene-set pathway analyses derived from multi-omics are exceptionally powerful. When preparing and analyzing high-dimensional multi-omics data, the installation process and programing skills required to use existing tools can be challenging. This is especially the case for those who are not familiar with coding. In addition, implementation with high performance computing solutions is required to run these tools efficiently.
Methods: We introduce an automatic multi-omics pathway workflow, a point and click graphical user interface to Multivariate Single Sample Gene Set Analysis (MOGSA), hosted on the Cancer Genomics Cloud by Seven Bridges Genomics. This workflow leverages the combination of different tools to perform data preparation for each given data types, dimensionality reduction, and MOGSA pathway analysis. The Omics data includes copy number alteration, transcriptomics data, proteomics and phosphoproteomics data. We have also provided an additional workflow to help with downloading data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium and preprocessing these data to be used for this multi-omics pathway workflow.
Results: The main outputs of this workflow are the distinct pathways for subgroups of interest provided by users, which are displayed in heatmaps if identified. In addition to this, graphs and tables are provided to users for reviewing.
Conclusion: Multi-omics Pathway Workflow requires no coding experience. Users can bring their own data or download and preprocess public datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium using our additional workflow based on the samples of interest. Distinct overactivated or deactivated pathways for groups of interest can be found. This useful information is important in effective therapeutic targeting.
Background: Breast cancer (BC) has been reported as one of the most common cancers diagnosed in females throughout the world. Survival rate of BC patients is affected by metastasis. So, exploring its underlying mechanisms and identifying related biomarkers to monitor BC relapse/recurrence using new statistical methods is essential. This study investigated the high-dimensional gene-expression profiles of BC patients using penalized additive hazards regression models.
Methods: A publicly available dataset related to the time to metastasis in BC patients (GSE2034) was used. There was information of 22 283 genes expression profiles related to 286 BC patients. Penalized additive hazards regression models with different penalties, including LASSO, SCAD, SICA, MCP and Elastic net were used to identify metastasis related genes.
Results: Five regression models with penalties were applied in the additive hazards model and jointly found 9 genes including SNU13, CLINT1, MAPK9, ABCC5, NKX3-1, NCOR2, COL2A1, and ZNF219. According the median of the prognostic index calculated using the regression coefficients of the penalized additive hazards model, the patients were labeled as high/low risk groups. A significant difference was detected in the survival curves of the identified groups. The selected genes were examined using validation data and were significantly associated with the hazard of metastasis.
Conclusion: This study showed that MAPK9, NKX3-1, NCOR1, ABCC5, and CD44 are the potential recurrence and metastatic predictors in breast cancer and can be taken into account as candidates for further research in tumorigenesis, invasion, metastasis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer.
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary cancer in the skeletal system, characterized by a high incidence of lung metastasis, local recurrence and death. Systemic treatment of this aggressive cancer has not improved significantly since the introduction of chemotherapy regimens, underscoring a critical need for new treatment strategies. TRAIL receptors have long been proposed to be therapeutic targets for cancer treatment, but their role in osteosarcoma remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the expression profile of four TRAIL receptors in human OS cells using total RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq). The results revealed that TNFRSF10B and TNFRSF10D but not TNFRSF10A and TNFRSF10C are differentially expressed in human OS cells as compared to normal cells. At the single cell level by scRNA-seq analyses, TNFRSF10B, TNFRSF10D, TNFRSF10A and TNFRSF10C are most abundantly expressed in endothelial cells of OS tissues among nine distinct cell clusters. Notably, in osteoblastic OS cells, TNFRSF10B is most abundantly expressed, followed by TNFRSF10D, TNFRSF10A and TNFRSF10C. Similarly, in an OS cell line U2-OS using RNA-seq, TNFRSF10B is most abundantly expressed, followed by TNFRSF10D, TNFRSF10A and TNFRSF10C. According to the TARGET online database, poor patient outcomes were associated with low expression of TNFRSF10C. These results could provide a new perspective to design novel therapeutic targets of TRAIL receptors for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of OS and other cancers.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-marketing safety, tolerability, immunogenicity and efficacy of Bevacizumab (manufactured by Hetero Biopharma) in a broader population of patients with solid tumors.
Patients and methods: This phase IV, prospective, multi-centric clinical study was carried out in Indian patients with solid malignancies (metastatic colorectal cancer, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma) treated with Bevacizumab between April 2018 and July 2019. This study included 203 patients from 16 tertiary care oncology centers across India for safety assessment, of which a subset of 115 patients who have consented were also evaluated for efficacy and immunogenicity. This study was prospectively registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI), and was commenced only after receiving approval from the competent authority (Central Drugs Standard Control Organization, CDSCO).
Results: Out of the 203 enrolled patients, 121 (59.6%) patients reported 338 adverse events (AEs) during this study. Of 338 reported AEs, 14 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by 13 patients including 6 fatal SAEs, assessed as unrelated to the study medication and 7 non-fatal SAEs, 5 assessed as related, and 3 unrelated to Bevacizumab. Most AEs reported in this study (33.9%) were general disorders and administration site conditions, followed by gastrointestinal disorders (29.1%). The most frequently reported AEs were diarrhea (11.3%), asthenia (10.3%), headache (8.9%), pain (7.4%), vomiting (7.9%), and neutropenia (5.9%). At the end of the study, 2 (1.75%) of 69 patients reported antibodies to Bevacizumab without affecting safety and efficacy. However, at the end of 12 months, no patient had reported antibodies to Bevacizumab. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were reported in 18.3%, 22.6%, 9.6%, and 8.7% of patients, respectively. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was reported in 40.9% of patients at the end of the study. Disease control rate (DCR), also known as the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was reported in 50.4% of patients.
Conclusions: Bevacizumab (Cizumab, Hetero Biopharma) was observed to be safe, well tolerated, lacking immunogenicity, and efficacious in the treatment of solid tumors. The findings of this phase IV study of Bevacizumab, primarily as a combination therapy regimen suggest its suitability and rationality for usage in multiple solid malignancies.
Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/4/13371 [Registered on CTRI http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/advsearch.php : 19/04/2018]; Trial Registered Prospectively.
Genomic instability is considered a fundamental factor involved in any neoplastic disease. Consequently, the genetically unstable cells contribute to intratumoral genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic diversity of cancer. These genetic alterations can be detected by several diagnostic techniques of molecular biology and the detection of alteration in genomic integrity may serve as reliable genetic molecular markers for the early detection of cancer or cancer-related abnormal changes in the body cells. These genetic molecular markers can detect cancer earlier than any other method of cancer diagnosis, once a tumor is diagnosed, then replacement or therapeutic manipulation of these cancer-related abnormal genetic changes can be possible, which leads toward effective and target-specific cancer treatment and in many cases, personalized treatment of cancer could be performed without the adverse effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In this review, we describe how these genetic molecular markers can be detected and the possible ways for the application of this gene diagnosis for gene therapy that can attack cancerous cells, directly or indirectly, which lead to overall improved management and quality of life for a cancer patient.
Host immunogenetics play a critical role in the human immune response to melanoma, influencing both melanoma prevalence and immunotherapy outcomes. Beneficial outcomes that stimulate T cell response hinge on binding affinity and immunogenicity of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) with melanoma antigen epitopes. Here, we use an in silico approach to characterize binding affinity and immunogenicity of 69 HLA Class I human leukocyte antigen alleles to epitopes of 11 known melanoma antigens. The findings document a significant proportion of positively immunogenic epitope-allele combinations, with the highest proportions of positive immunogenicity found for the Q13072/BAGE1 melanoma antigen and alleles of the HLA B and C genes. The findings are discussed in terms of a personalized precision HLA-mediated adjunct to immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy to maximize tumor elimination.
Introduction: One of the most pressing goals for cancer immunotherapy at this time is the identification of actionable antigens.
Methods: This study relies on the following considerations and approaches to identify potential breast cancer antigens: (i) the significant role of the adaptive immune receptor, complementarity determining region-3 (CDR3) in antigen binding, and the existence cancer testis antigens (CTAs); (ii) chemical attractiveness; and (iii) informing the relevance of the integration of items (i) and (ii) with patient outcome and tumor gene expression data.
Results: We have assessed CTAs for associations with survival, based on their chemical complementarity with tumor resident T-cell receptor (TCR), CDR3s. Also, we have established gene expression correlations with the high TCR CDR3-CTA chemical complementarities, for Granzyme B, and other immune biomarkers.
Conclusions: Overall, for several independent TCR CDR3 breast cancer datasets, the CTA, ARMC3, stood out as a completely novel, candidate antigen based on multiple algorithms with highly consistent approaches. This conclusion was facilitated by use of the recently constructed Adaptive Match web tool.
Aim: In this study our aim was to elucidate whether advanced cancer patients benefit from antibiotic treatment in the last days of life in addition to reviewing the relevant costs and effects.
Materials and methods: We reviewed medical records from 100 end-stage cancer patients and their antibiotic use during the hospitalization in Imam Khomeini hospital. Patient's medical records were analyzed retrospectively for cause and periodicity of infections, fever, increase in acute phase proteins, cultures, type and cost of antibiotic.
Results: Microorganisms were found in only 29 patients (29%) and the most microorganism among the patients was E. coli (6%). About 78% of the patients had clinical symptoms. The highest dose of antibiotics was related to Ceftriaxone (40.2%) and in the second place was Metronidazole (34.7%) and the lowest dose was related to Levofloxacin, Gentamycin and Colistin (1.4%). Fifty-one patients (71%) did not have any side effects due to antibiotics. The most common side effect of antibiotics among patients was skin rash (12.5%). The average estimated cost for antibiotic use was 7 935 540 Rials (24.4 dollars).
Conclusion: Prescription of antibiotics was not effective in symptom control in advanced cancer patients. The cost of using antibiotics during hospitalization is very high and also the risk of developing resistant pathogens during admission should be considered. Antibiotic side effects also occur in patients, causing more harm to the patient at the end of life. Therefore, the benefits of antibiotic advice in this time is less than its negative effects.

